1: %% 2MASS HD3651B, Adam Burgasser, 4/9/6 -
2:
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
5:
6: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
7: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\sun}$}
8: \newcommand{\ldl}{$\lambda/{\Delta}{\lambda}$}
9: \newcommand{\teff}{T$_{eff}$}
10: \newcommand{\logg}{$\log{g}$}
11: \newcommand{\kion}{\ion{K}{1}}
12: \newcommand{\naion}{\ion{Na}{1}}
13: \newcommand{\meth}{CH$_4$}
14: \newcommand{\water}{H$_2$O}
15: \newcommand{\namesrc}{HD~3651}
16:
17: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ 6 Sep 2006; accepted 16 Nov 2006}
18:
19: \shorttitle{Physical Properties of HD~3651B}
20: \shortauthors{Burgasser et al.}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{The Physical Properties of HD~3651B: An Extrasolar Nemesis?}
25:
26: \author{Adam J.\ Burgasser\altaffilmark{1}}
27:
28: \affil{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research,
29: Building 37, Room 664B, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139; ajb@mit.edu}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by
32: the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement NCC 5-538 with the National Aeronautics
33: and Space Administration, Office of Space Science, Planetary Astronomy Program.}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: I present detailed analysis of the
37: near infrared spectrum of HD~3651B, a faint, co-moving wide companion
38: to the nearby planet-hosting star HD~3651. These data confirm the companion as a brown dwarf with spectral type T8, consistent with the analysis of Luhman et al. Application of the semi-empirical technique of Burgasser,
39: Burrows \& Kirkpatrick indicates that HD~3651B has $T_{eff}$ = 790$\pm$30~K and $\log{g}$ = 5.0$\pm$0.3 for a metallicity of [M/H] = 0.12$\pm$0.04,
40: consistent with a
41: mass M = 0.033$\pm$0.013~M$_{\sun}$ and an age of 0.7--4.7~Gyr.
42: The surface gravity, mass and age estimates of this source
43: are all highly sensitive to the
44: assumed metallicity; however, a supersolar metallicity is
45: deduced by direct comparison of spectral models to
46: the observed absolute fluxes. The age of HD~3651B is somewhat better
47: constrained than that of the primary, with estimates for the latter ranging
48: over $\sim$2~Gyr to $>$12~Gyr.
49: As a widely orbiting massive object to a known planetary
50: system that could potentially
51: harbor terrestrial planets in its habitable zone, HD~3651B
52: may play the role of Nemesis in this system.
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55:
56: \keywords{Galaxy: solar neighborhood ---
57: stars: individual (HD~3651B, Gliese~570D) ---
58: stars: fundamental parameters ---
59: stars: low mass, brown dwarfs ---
60: stars: planetary systems}
61:
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64:
65:
66: \citet{luh06} and \citet{mug06} have recently reported the discovery of a co-moving,
67: widely-separated
68: (43$\arcsec$; 480~AU projected separation) companion to the nearby K0~V dwarf
69: {\namesrc}. Low resolution near-infrared spectroscopy of this source
70: has identified it as a late T-type brown dwarf \citep{luh06}.
71: The {\namesrc} system also
72: hosts a closely-separated ($a$ = 0.296$\pm$0.017~AU), high-eccentricity
73: ($e$ = 0.64$\pm$0.04) sub-Saturn-mass planet
74: (M$\sin{i}$ = 0.23$\pm$0.02 M$_{Jupiter}$),
75: {\namesrc}b, identified
76: from radial velocity variability \citep{fis03}. While several
77: exoplanet-host stars are known to have
78: stellar-mass companions (e.g., \citealt{low02,pat02,egg04,rag06}),
79: {\namesrc}ABb is the
80: first star/brown dwarf/planet system to be identified, and is
81: therefore a key target for
82: studies of all three of these mass-delineated classes.
83:
84: In this article, I analyze low-resolution near-infrared spectroscopy
85: of {\namesrc}B, using the technique of \citet[hereafter BBK]{metgrav}
86: to derive the effective temperature ({\teff}), surface gravity
87: ({\logg}), metallicity ([M/H]), mass and age of this source.
88: Acquisition and characterization
89: of the spectral data, obtained with SpeX
90: \citep{ray03} mounted on the 3m
91: NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (hereafter IRTF) is described in $\S$~2. Spectral analysis to derive the physical properties of HD~3651B is presented in $\S$~3, with the importance of metallicity effects highlighted by the
92: determination that this companion must be
93: metal-rich like the system's primary.
94: Finally, in $\S$~5 I
95: speculate on the role of {\namesrc}B as a Nemesis analog
96: in the {\namesrc} system.
97:
98: \section{Observations}
99:
100: {\namesrc}B was observed with SpeX on 3 September 2006 (UT) under clear
101: and dry conditions with good seeing (0$\farcs$7 at $J$-band).
102: The target was acquired using the SpeX guiding camera, and
103: low resolution near infrared
104: spectral data were obtained
105: using the SpeX prism mode and 0$\farcs$5 slit, yielding
106: a spectral resolution {\ldl} $\approx$ 120.
107: %and dispersion across the chip of 20--30~{\AA}~pixel$^{-1}$.
108: The slit was aligned to the parallactic angle to mitigate
109: differential refraction effects.
110: Note that this setup was similar to that used by
111: \citet{luh06} for their spectral
112: observations of {\namesrc}B, with the exception
113: of a slightly narrower slit (0$\farcs$5 versus 0$\farcs$8).
114: Eight exposures of 180~s each
115: were obtained in an ABBA dither pattern along the slit.
116: %, for a total
117: %integration time of 1440~s at airmass 1.06.
118: %As {\namesrc}B is quite
119: %faint, the telescope was guided on a nearby source present in the
120: %guide camera's field of view.
121: The A0~V star HD~7215 was observed immediately
122: afterward and at a similar airmass (1.06) for flux calibration.
123: Internal flat field and Ar arc lamps exposures were also acquired
124: for pixel response and wavelength calibration. All data were
125: reduced using SpeXtool version 3.3
126: \citep{cus04} using standard settings (cf.~\citealt{mewide3}).
127:
128: Figure~\ref{fig_spectra} compares the reduced spectrum of {\namesrc}B
129: to equivalent data for
130: the T7.5 companion brown dwarf Gliese~570D \citep{megl570d}
131: and the T8 field brown dwarf 2MASS~J04151954-0935066
132: \citep[hereafter 2MASS~0415-0935]{me02}.
133: The strong {\water} and {\meth} bands present in the spectrum of {\namesrc}B
134: are consistent with the observations of \citet{luh06}, and
135: confirm this object as a late T-type brown dwarf.
136: Classification of this source was done using the spectral indices
137: of \citet{meclass}. The
138: measurements and associated subtypes are as follows:
139: {\water}-J = 0.044 (T8), {\meth}-J = 0.203 (T7.5), {\water}-H = 0.186 (T8),
140: {\meth}-H = 0.134 (T7.5) and {\meth}-K = 0.043 (T8), for a mean classification
141: of T8. This value is consistent with the T7.5 subtype derived by \citet{luh06} given the typical 0.5 subtype uncertainty in near infrared T dwarf classifications \citep{meclass}.
142:
143: \section{The Physical Properties of {\namesrc}B}
144:
145: \subsection{Derived Properties and Metallicity Dependence}
146:
147: As a companion to a well-studied, nearby star, the properties of
148: {\namesrc}B could be readily derived by adopting the age and metallicity of the primary
149: (e.g.~\citealt{kir01,wil01,luh06}). Alternately, the
150: semi-empirical technique described in BBK can be employed.
151: This method involves the
152: comparison of {\water} and color spectral ratios measured
153: on the spectrum of a late-type T dwarf, which are separately
154: sensitive to {\teff} and {\logg} (for a given metallicity),
155: to the same ratios measured on theoretical spectral models.
156: The latter are calibrated to
157: reproduce the measured indices for the near infrared SpeX prism
158: spectrum of Gliese~570D \citep{mewide3}, which has reported physical
159: parameters of
160: {\teff} = 782--821~K,
161: {\logg} = 4.95--5.23 and [Fe/H] = 0.09$\pm$0.04, based on
162: empirical measurements and evolutionary models \citep{geb01,sau06}.
163: This method
164: provides constraints on both {\teff} and {\logg} which can then be used
165: to infer mass and age with evolutionary models or empirically
166: via the source's bolometric luminosity.
167:
168: In BBK and \citet{lie06}, this method was applied assuming solar or subsolar metallicities. However, the primary of the {\namesrc} has a
169: metallicity greater than solar, [Fe/H] = 0.12$\pm$0.04 \citep{san04}.
170: It has been shown in both BBK and \citet{lie06} that slightly
171: subsolar metallicities can significantly skew the derived {\teff} and
172: {\logg} values. Hence, several cases were considered for
173: 0 $\leq$ [M/H] $\leq$ 0.24.
174: The spectral models of \citet{bur06} were employed, spanning
175: 700 $\leq$ {\teff} $\leq$ 1100~K, 4.5 $\leq$ {\logg} $\leq$ 5.5 (cgs)
176: and 0 $\leq$ [M/H] $\leq$ 0.5.
177: % interpolated in steps of
178: %$\Delta${\teff} = 20~K, $\Delta${\logg} = 0.1 dex and $\Delta$[M/H] = 0.1 dex.
179: Four pairs of indices were compared
180: between ({\water}-J, {\water}-H) and (K/J, K/H).\footnote{For
181: definitions of these spectral ratios, see BBK and \citet{meclass}.}
182:
183: Figure~\ref{fig_tg} illustrates the ({\teff}, {\logg}) phase
184: spaces for both [M/H] = 0 and 0.12 over which the spectral ratios
185: {\water}-J and K/H measured on the spectrum of {\namesrc}B
186: match calibrated values from
187: the models. Their intersection yields robust constraints on
188: these parameters for the source.
189: All four pairs of indices result in a combined
190: {\teff} = 790$\pm$30~K
191: and {\logg} = 5.0$\pm$0.2
192: for [M/H] = 0.12 (Table~1);
193: including the full uncertainty in [M/H] increases
194: the uncertainty on {\logg} to 0.3 dex.\footnote{Note that additional systematic
195: uncertainties of $\pm$50~K and $\pm$0.1~dex in the derived {\teff}
196: and {\logg} values may
197: be present due to uncertainty in the parameters of Gliese~570D and
198: possible systematic
199: effects in the spectral models (BBK).}
200: For [M/H] = 0, the analysis yields {\teff} = 810$\pm$30~K
201: and {\logg} = 4.7$\pm$0.2. Note that a decrease in the assumed metallicity leads to a decrease in the derived
202: surface gravity. This is
203: consistent with trends for subsolar metallicity T dwarfs (BBK; \citealt{lie06}),
204: and is largely due to the impact of both metallicity and surface gravity
205: on the relative opacity of collision-induced H$_2$ absorption
206: that dominates the $K$-band opacity (e.g., \citealt{sau94}).
207:
208: The {\teff} and {\logg} values of {\namesrc}B for [M/H] = 0.12$\pm$0.04
209: infer M = 0.033$\pm$0.013~M$_{\sun}$
210: and an age $\tau$ = 0.7--4.7~Gyr, based on the evolutionary models
211: of \citet{bur01}. For solar metallicity, these values decrease to
212: M = 0.020$\pm$0.005~M$_{\sun}$
213: and $\tau$ = 0.4--1.2~Gyr, primarily due to the lower surface gravity
214: indicated in this case.
215: %As discussed below, this rather young age argues
216: %against a solar metallicity for this source.
217: An estimate of mass can also be obtained from the
218: bolometric luminosity ($L$) of {\namesrc}B by the relation
219: M = $Lg/4{\pi}G{\sigma}T_{eff}^4$.
220: Using the luminosity derived by \citet{luh06},
221: $\log{L/L_{\sun}} = -5.60{\pm}0.05$, and the {\teff} and {\logg} values
222: derived from the spectroscopic analysis yields
223: M = 0.023$_{-0.010}^{+0.020}$~M$_{\sun}$
224: (M = 0.011$_{-0.004}^{+0.008}$~M$_{\sun}$) for [M/H] = 0.12
225: ([M/H] = 0.0). These
226: values are consistent with those derived from the
227: evolutionary models, albeit with larger uncertainties
228: driven primarily by the uncertainty in {\logg}.
229:
230:
231: \subsection{HD~3651B: A Metal-Rich T Dwarf}
232:
233:
234: The method outlined above, based on only two indices,
235: cannot discriminate between
236: [M/H] = 0 and 0.12 for HD 3651B, for in both cases it is possible to derive
robust constraints on both {\teff} and {\logg} (this is not always the case;
237: cf.\ Figure 8 of BBK).
238: A third spectral index that is uniquely sensitive to
239: metallicity is required, and BBK have suggested the ratio between the
240: 1.05 and 1.25~$\micron$ peak fluxes ($Y/J$ index) as a possible
241: option. This ratio is
242: sensitive to the far red wings of the pressure-broadened
243: 0.77~$\micron$ \ion{K}{1} doublet, and models indicate considerable
244: metallicity sensitivity to this feature. However,
245: the \citet{bur06} models do not reproduce the observed
246: trends between $Y$-band and $J$-band, likely due to current
247: uncertainties in the treatment of the far-wing opacities
248: \citep{bur03,all03}.
249:
250: An alternate procedure, used by \citet{lie06},
251: is to compare the observed absolute fluxes of the brown dwarf
252: to spectral models based on the best fit parameters for a given metallicity.
253: This is done in Figure~\ref{fig_model}, which shows the absolute
254: flux-calibrated spectrum of HD~3651B, based on $J$-band photometry
255: from \citet[16.16$\pm$0.03]{luh06} and the parallax of HD~3651A from HIPPARCOS \citep[$\pi$ = 90.0$\pm$0.7 mas]{pry97};
256: to predicted fluxes for two {\teff} = 800~K models,
257: one with {\logg} = 4.7 and [M/H] = 0 and
258: one with {\logg} = 5.0 and [M/H] = 0.12. While the models
259: provide poor fits to the 1.1 and 1.6~$\micron$ {\meth} bands, the result
260: of well-documented deficiencies in {\meth} opacities at these
261: wavelengths, it is
262: clear that the lower
263: surface gravity, solar metallicity model is too bright as compared
264: to the data. The [M/H] = 0.12 model, on the other hand, provides a
265: reasonably good match to the absolute fluxes at each of
266: the spectral peaks. This comparison clearly supports a supersolar
267: metallicity for HD~3651B.
268:
269: Another consideration is the inferred age of {\namesrc}B as
270: compared to previous age determinations for
271: {\namesrc}A. Published estimates for the primary
272: vary appreciably.
273: \citet{wri04} report an age of 5.9~Gyr on the basis of weak
274: \ion{Ca}{2} HK emission ($\log{R_{HK}^{\prime}} = -5.07$) and the age/activity relation of \citet{don93}. On the other hand,
275: \citet{roc04} report a chromospheric age of only 2.1~Gyr based on a
276: higher value of $\log{R_{HK}^{\prime}} = -4.85$ from
277: \citet{sod93}. Indeed, a 35\% variation in \ion{Ca}{2}
278: HK emission of {\namesrc}B
279: has been seen over 17 years of observations at Mount
280: Wilson Observatory \citep{dun91}.
281: From isochrone fitting, \citet{nor04} derive a minimum age
282: of 2.6~Gyr, \citet{val05} an age of 8$^{+4}_{-5}$~Gyr and
283: \citet{tak06} a minimum age of 11.8~Gyr.
284: While there appears to be little consensus,
285: an older age for {\namesrc}A is most consistent with its
286: chromospheric inactivity,
287: its long rotation period
288: (48~days; \citealt{noy84})
289: and its $UVW$ space velocities \citep{egg89}. A value in the range
290: 2--12~Gyr is indicated.
291:
292: This result again argues in favor of
293: HD~3651B being metal-rich.
294: The derived age for the solar metallicity case is considerably younger
295: than that of the primary; while
296: for [M/H] = 0.12$\pm$0.04, the ages of the primary
297: and secondary overlap
298: in the range of 2--5~Gyr. Note that this age constraint
299: is more precise than that inferred from the primary alone, and is
300: consistent with both components having been formed at the same
301: time and from the same gas/dust reservior (same age and metallicity)
302:
303: There are two conclusions that may be drawn from this
304: analysis. First, it is clear that the
305: determination of {\teff} and {\logg}, and hence mass and age,
306: of an individual brown dwarf using the BBK technique is highly
307: sensitive to the assumed metallicity, even for small variations.\footnote{[M/H] = 0.12 implies only a 32\% increase in metal abundance over solar.}
308: This reflects the overall sensitivity of cool brown dwarf spectra to changes
309: in photospheric abundances, and is not surprising given that the
310: entire near infrared spectrum of a T dwarf is draped by atomic and molecular
311: absorptions. While metallicity effects have been previously noted
312: in the spectra of metal-poor
313: T dwarfs such as 2MASS~J09373487+2931409 \citep[BBK]{me02,kna04}
314: and 2MASS~J12373919+6526148 \citep{me99,lie06}, it is now clear
315: that metal-rich
316: T dwarf spectra can also exhibit metallicity effects. These results emphasize
317: the importance of characterizing the overall abundances --- and abundance
318: patterns --- in deriving a complete and accurate characterization
319: of a low-temperature brown dwarf.
320: Note that HD~3651B and Gliese~570D may be a particularly useful
321: pair in studying metallicity effects, as they appear to be identical in nearly all aspects ({\teff}, {\logg}, age, mass and spectral energy distribution)
322: except metallicity.
323:
324: Second, it is possible that coeval
325: brown dwarf companions may provide
326: additional or even better constraints on the ages of their host systems than some
327: stellar primaries. While age estimates for stars
328: on the basis of chromospheric activity and kinematics can vary
329: appreciably, and are less discriminating at later ages, the example of HD~3651B demonstrates that a late-type brown dwarf can potentially be age-dated with higher precision. However, the accuracy of these
330: ages remains unclear, as they are tied to both
331: the fidelity of evolutionary
332: models and, in the case of the BBK technique, the accuracy and calibration of
333: spectral models.
334: In the former case, there have been few empirical checks on the evolutionary
335: models of brown dwarfs at late ages,\footnote{At very young ages ($\sim$1--5~Myr), both
336: \citet{moh04} and \citet{sta06} have found discrepancies between
337: evolutionary models and observed parameters. It is possible that these discrepancies arise from the initial conditions assumed in the evolutionary
338: models, and may be unimportant at late ages (cf. \citealt{mar06}).} although BBK found consistency between the
339: radii of field T dwarfs empirically derived from luminosity measurements and those
340: based on evolutionary models.
341: In the latter case, there appears to be consistency between
342: different sets of spectral models, as an equivalent
343: analysis of the spectrum of {\namesrc}B
344: using the COND models of \citet{all01} produced nearly identical
345: results. Hence, at first glance it appears that
346: late-type brown
347: dwarf companions could be useful sources for characterizing the properties
348: of a presumably coeval system, although further empirical
349: tests of brown dwarf evolutionary models
350: are needed.
351:
352:
353: \section{{\namesrc}B: An Extrasolar Nemesis?}
354:
355: {\namesrc}B is the first wide brown dwarf companion
356: found in a system
357: hosting at least one known planet. This raises an intriguing question:
358: how has the evolution of the {\namesrc} planetary system ---
359: and specifically the development
360: of life on any putative habitable planets in this system --- been influenced by
361: this distant brown dwarf companion?
362: This speculative question is an appropriate one,
363: as putative terrestrial bodies within a portion of
364: {\namesrc}A's habitable zone \citep{kas93}
365: can persist without dynamical disruption by
366: {\namesrc}b \citep{jon05}, even considering this giant planet's
367: probable inward migration \citep{man03}.
368: Terrestrial planet formation around the primary of a
369: wide binary system has also been shown to be feasible \citep{hol97,qui04}.
370: However, the formation, existence and habitability of terrestrial planets
371: in the {\namesrc} system may be inhibited by
372: dynamical perturbations from {\namesrc}B, both directly through orbital
373: modulation\footnote{Indeed, \citealt{luh06} suggest that the eccentricity of {\namesrc}b
374: may be driven by secular perturbations from {\namesrc}B.} \citep{tak05}; or the scattering of small bodies, resulting in sustained impacting onto the planet's
375: surface. Yet terrestrial planets on
376: mildly eccentric orbits can maintain habitability depending on the properties
377: of their atmospheres \citep{ada06}, while increased impacting rates
378: may in fact facilitate the emergence of life.
379: In the case of the
380: Earth, the late heavy bombardment period between 4.5 and 3.8 Gyr ago
381: resulted in one particularly cataclysmic impact that
382: formed the Moon \citep{har75},
383: whose tidal forces have maintained Earth's tilt to the Sun and have
384: thereby reduced climate variation. Impacts of icy bodies
385: may have brought necessary water ice
386: to Earth's surface \citep{chy87,del98} as well as chemical
387: precursors to biotic life \citep{chy90}. On the other hand,
388: later impacts clearly have a negative effect on the evolution
389: of macrobiotic life \citep{alv80,hil91}.
390:
391: As an instigator of
392: planetary impacts, {\namesrc}B may play the role of Nemesis in
393: the {\namesrc} system. This
394: hypothesized companion to the Sun \citep{dav84,whi84}
395: has been proposed to
396: explain apparent periodicities in massive extinctions
397: \citep{fis77,rau84,hut87},
398: terrestrial cratering rates \citep{alv84,ram84}, reversals
399: of Earth's magnetic fields \citep{rau85} and, more recently,
400: the peculiar orbits of inner Oort Cloud
401: planetoids \citep{bro04,gau05}. If
402: {\namesrc}B were present at its observed separation
403: but bound to the Sun,
404: it would be invisible to the naked eye ($M_V \sim 27$ implies $V \sim 9$)
405: but readily detectable by Hipparcos, Tycho \citep{pry97}
406: and early wide-field near-infrared sky surveys ($K \sim -1$; cf. the
407: Two-Micron Sky Survey, \citealt{neu69}). If HD~3651B
408: was at the distance from the Sun proposed for Nemesis
409: ($\sim$1.5$\times$10$^5$~AU; \citealt{dav84}), it
410: would be invisible on visual photographic plate images
411: ($V$ $\sim$ 20)
412: but a relatively bright source ($J$ $\sim$ 10)
413: in the Two Micron All Sky Survey \citep{skr06}.
414:
415: Searches for a solar Nemesis have so far turned up negative
416: (e.g., \citealt{per86}). However, as widely-separated low mass
417: stellar companions appear to be
418: prevalent in known planet-hosting systems (e.g., \citealt{rag06}),
419: and with widely-separated
420: brown dwarf companions to these systems only now being identified,
421: Nemesis counterparts may be a common facet of all planetary systems
422: and an important consideration for the emergence of terrestrial-based life.
423:
424: \acknowledgments
425:
426: The author thanks D.\ Chakrabarty and J.\ Winn
427: for their helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript,
428: and acknowledges the support of telescope operator E.\ Volquardsen
429: and instrument specialist J.\ Rayner during the IRTF observations.
430: The author also thanks the anonymous referee for her/his insightful comments
431: that led to the investigation of metallicity effects in the {\teff}/{\logg}
432: analysis.
433: Electronic versions of their evolutionary and spectral models
434: were kindly provided by A.\ Burrows and P.\ Hauschildt for this work.
435: The author wishes to recognize and acknowledge the
436: very significant cultural role and reverence that
437: the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the
438: indigenous Hawaiian community. He is most fortunate
439: to have had the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
440:
441:
442: Facilities: \facility{IRTF(SpeX)}
443:
444:
445: \begin{thebibliography}{}
446:
447:
448: \bibitem[Adams \& Laughlin(2006)]{ada06}Adams, F.\ C., \& Laughlin, G. 2006, \apj, 649, 992
449:
450: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2001)]{all01}Allard, F., Hauschildt, P.\ H.,
451: Alexander, D.\ R., Tamanai, A., \& Schweitzer, A. 2001, \apj, 556, 357
452:
453: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2003)]{all03}Allard, N.\ F., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P.\ H., Kielkopf, J.\ F., \& Machin, L. 2003, \aap, 411, L473
454:
455: \bibitem[Alvarez et al.(1980)]{alv80}Alvarez, L.\ W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F.,
456: \& Michel, H.\ V. 1980, Science, 208, 1095
457:
458: \bibitem[Alvarez \& Muller(1984)]{alv84}Alvarez, W., \& Muller, R.\ A.
459: 1984, Nature, 308, 718
460:
461: \bibitem[Brown, Trujillo \& Rabinowitz(2004)]{bro04} Brown, M.\ E.,
462: Trujillo, C., \& Rabinowitz, D. 2004, \apj, 617, 645
463:
464: \bibitem[Burgasser, Burrows \& Kirkpatrick(2006)]{metgrav} Burgasser, A.\ J.,
465: Burrows, A., \& Kirkpatrick, J.\ D. 2006, \apj, 639, 1095 (BBK)
466:
467: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2004)]{mewide3}Burgasser, A.\ J., McElwain, M.\ W.,
468: Kirkpatrick, J.\ D., Cruz, K.\ L., Tinney, C.\ G., \& Reid, I.\ N. 2004, \aj, 127, 2856
469:
470: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2006)]{meclass}Burgasser, A.\ J., Geballe, T.\ R.,
471: Leggett, S.\ K., Kirkpatrick, J.\ D., \& Golimowski, D.\ A. 2006, \apj, 637, 1067
472:
473: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(1999)]{me99} Burgasser, A.\ J., et al. 1999, \apj, 522, L65
474:
475: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2000)]{megl570d} Burgasser, A.\ J., et al. 2000, \apj, 531, L57
476:
477: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2002)]{me02} Burgasser, A.\ J., et al. 2002, \apj, 564, 421
478:
479: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2001)]{bur01}Burrows, A., Hubbard, W.\ B., Lunine,
480: J.\ I., \& Liebert, J. 2001, Rev.\ of Modern Physics, 73, 719
481:
482: \bibitem[Burrows, Sudarsky \& Hubeny(2006)]{bur06}Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., \& Hubeny, I.
483: 2006, \apj, 640, 1063
484:
485: \bibitem[Burrows \& Volobuyev(2003)]{bur03} Burrows, A., \& Volobuyev, M. 2003, \apj,
486: 583, 985
487:
488: \bibitem[Chyba(1987)]{chy87}Chyba, C.\ F. 1987, Nature, 330, 632
489:
490: \bibitem[Chyba et al.(1990)]{chy90}Chyba, C.\ F., Thomas, P.\ J.,
491: Brookshaw, L., \& Sagan, C. 1990, Science, 249, 366
492:
493: \bibitem[Cushing, Vacca, \& Rayner(2004)]{cus04} Cushing, M.\ C., Vacca, W.\ D., \& Rayner, J.\ T.
494: 2004, PASP, 116, 362
495:
496: \bibitem[Davis, Hut \& Muller(1984)]{dav84}Davis, M., Hut, P., \& Muller, R.\ A. 1984, Nature, 308, 715
497:
498: \bibitem[Delsemme(1998)]{del98}Delsemme, A.\ H. 1998, P\&SS, 47, 125
499:
500: \bibitem[Donahue(1993)]{don93}Donahue, R.\ A. 1993, Ph.D.\ Thesis, New Mexico
501: State University
502:
503: \bibitem[Duncan et al.(1991)]{dun91}Duncan, D.\ K., et al. 1991, \apjs, 76, 383
504:
505: \bibitem[Eggen(1989)]{egg89}Eggen, O.\ J. 1989, \pasp, 101, 366
506:
507: \bibitem[Eggenberger, Udry \& Mayor(2004)]{egg04}Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., \& Mayor, M. 2004, \aap, 417, 353
508:
509: \bibitem[Fischer \& Arthur(1977)]{fis77}Fischer, A.\ G., \& Arthur, M.\ A. 1977, Soc.\ Econ.\ Paleont.\ Miner.\ Spec.\ Publ. 25, 19
510:
511: \bibitem[Fischer et al.(2003)]{fis03}Fischer, D.\ A., Butler, R.\ P.,
512: Marcy, G.\ W., Vogt, S.\ S., \& Henry, G.\ W. 2003, \apj, 590, 1081
513:
514: \bibitem[Gaudi \& Bloom(2005)]{gau05}Gaudi, B.\ S., \& Bloom, J.\ S. 2005, \apj, 635, 711
515:
516: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(2001)]{geb01}Geballe, T.\ R., Saumon, D., Leggett,
517: S.\ K., Knapp, G.\ R., Marley, M.\ S., \& Lodders, K. 2001, \apj, 556, 373
518:
519: \bibitem[Hartmann \& Davis(1975)]{har75}Hartmann, W.\ K., \& Davis, D.\ R. 1975 Icarus, 24, 505
520:
521: \bibitem[Hildebrand et al.(1991)]{hil91}Hildebrand, A.\ R., Penfield, G.\ T., Kring, D.\ A., Pilkington, M., Camargo, A.\ Z., Jacobsen, S.\ B.,
522: \& Boynton, W.\ V. et al. 1991, Geology, 19, 867
523:
524: \bibitem[Holman, \& Wiegert(1997)]{hol97} Holman, M., \& Weigert, P.\ A. 1997, \aj, 117, 621
525:
526: \bibitem[Hut et al.(1987)]{hut87}Hut, P., Alvarez, W., Elder, W.\ P., Kauffman, E.\ G., Hansen, T., Keller, G., Shoemaker, E.\ M., \& Weissman, P.\ R. 1987, Nature, 329, 118
527:
528: \bibitem[Jones, Underwood \& Sleep(2005)]{jon05} Jones, B.\ W., Underwood, D.\ R., \& Sleep, P.\ N. 2005, \apj, 622, 1091
529:
530: \bibitem[Kasting, Whitmire \& Reynolds(1993)]{kas93} Kasting, J.\ F.,
531: Whitmire, D.\ P., \& Reynolds, R.\ T. 1993, Icaurs, 101, 108
532:
533: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick et al.(2001)]{kir01}Kirkpatrick, J.\ D., Dahn, C.\ C.,
534: Monet, D.\ G., Reid, I.\ N., Gizis, J.\ E.,
535: Liebert, J., \& Burgasser, A.\ J. 2001,
536: \aj, 121, 3235
537:
538: \bibitem[Knapp et al.(2004)]{kna04}Knapp, G., et al. 2004, \apj, 127, 3553
539:
540: \bibitem[Liebert \& Burgasser(2006)]{lie06}Liebert, J., \& Burgasser, A.\ J. 2006, \apj, in press
541:
542: \bibitem[Lowrance, Kirkpatrick \& Beichman(2002)]{low02}Lowrance, P.\ J.,
543: Kirkpatrick, J.\ D., \& Beichmann, C.\ A. 2002, \apj, 572, L79
544:
545: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2006)]{luh06}Luhman, K.\ L., et al. 2006, \apj, in press
546:
547: \bibitem[Mandell \& Sigurdsson(2003)]{man03} Mandell, A.\ M., \& Sigurdsson, S. 2003, \apj, 599, L111
548:
549: \bibitem[Marley et al.(2006)]{mar06}Marley, M.\ S., Fortney, J.\ J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., \& Lissauer, J.\ J. 2006, \apj, in press
550:
551:
552: \bibitem[Mohanty et al.(2004)]{moh04}Mohanty, S., Basri, G., Jayawardhana, R., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P., \& Ardila, D. 2004, \apj, 609, 854
553:
554: \bibitem[Mugrauer et al.(2006)]{mug06} Mugrauer, M., Seifahrt, A., Neuh{\"{a}}user, R., \& Mazeh, T. 2006, \mnras, in press
555:
556: \bibitem[Neugebauer \& Leighton(1969)]{neu69}Neugebauer, G., \& Leighton,
557: R.\ B. 1969, Two-Micron Sky Survey, A Preliminary Catalogue (Washington: NASA)
558:
559: \bibitem[Nordstr\"{o}m et al.(2004)]{nor04} Nordstr\"{o}m, B., et al. 2004, \aap, 418, 989
560:
561: \bibitem[Noyes et al.(1984)]{noy84}Noyes, R.\ W., Hartmann, L.\ W., Baliunas, S.\ L., Duncan, D.\ K.,
562: \& Vaughan, A.\ H. 1984, \apj, 279, 763
563:
564: \bibitem[Patience et al.(2002)]{pat02}Patience, J., et al. 2002, \apj, 581, 654
565:
566: \bibitem[Perlmutter(1986)]{per86}Perlmutter, S. 1986, Ph.D.\ Thesis, University
567: of California, Berkeley
568:
569: \bibitem[Perryman et al.(1997)]{pry97}Perryman, M.\ A.\ C., et al. 1997,
570: \aap, 323, L49
571:
572: \bibitem[Quintana(2004)]{qui04} Quintana, E.\ V. 2004, Ph.D.\ Thesis, University of Michigan
573:
574: \bibitem[Raghavan et al.(2006)]{rag06}Raghavan, D., Henry, T.\ J., Mason,
575: B.\ D., Subasavage, J.\ P., Jao, W.-C., Beaulieu, T.\ D., \& Hambly, N.\ C.
576: 2006, \apj, 646, 523
577:
578: \bibitem[Rampino \& Stothers(1984)]{ram84} Rampino, M.\ R., \& Strothers, R.\ B. 1984, Nature, 308, 709
579:
580: \bibitem[Raup(1985)]{rau85} Raup, D.\ M. 1985, Nature, 314, 341
581:
582: \bibitem[Raup \& Sepkoski(1984)]{rau84} Raup, D.\ M., \& Sepkoski, J.\ J. 1984, Proc.\ Nat.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA, 81, 801
583:
584: \bibitem[Rayner et al.(2003)]{ray03} Rayner, J.\ T., Toomey, D.\ W., Onaka, P.\ M., Denault, A.\ J.,
585: Stahlberger, W.\ E., Vacca, W.\ D., Cushing, M.\ C., \& Wang, S. 2003, PASP, 155, 362
586:
587: \bibitem[Rocha-Pinto et al.(2004)]{roc04} Rocha-Pinto, H.\ J., et al. 2004, \aap, 423, 517
588:
589: \bibitem[Santos, Israelian \& Mayor(2004)]{san04} Santos, N.\ C., Israelian, G., \& Mayor, M. 2004, \aap, 415, 1153
590:
591: \bibitem[Saumon et al.(1994)]{sau94}Saumon, D., Bergeron, P., Lunine, J.\ I.,
592: Hubbard, W.\ B., \& Burrows, A. 1994, \apj, 424, 333
593:
594: \bibitem[Saumon et al.(2006)]{sau06}Saumon, D., Marley, M.\ S., Cushing, M.\ C., Leggett, S.\ K., Roellig, T.\ L., Lodders, K., \& Freedman, R.\ S. 2006, \apj, in press.
595:
596: \bibitem[Soderblom et al.(1993)]{sod93}Soderblom, D.\ R., Stauffer, J.\ R., , Hudon, J.\ D., \& Jones, B.\ F. 1993, \apjs, 85, 315
597:
598: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06}Skrutskie, M.\ F., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
599:
600: \bibitem[Stassun, Mathieu \& Valenti(2006)]{sta06}Stassun, K.\ G., Mathieu, R.\ D., \& Valenti, J.\ A. 2006, Nature, 440, 311
601:
602: \bibitem[Takeda et al.(2006)]{tak06}Takeda, G., Ford, E.\ B., Sills, A., Rasio, F.\ A., Fischer, D.\ A., \& Valenti, J.\ A. 2006, \apjs, submitted
603:
604: \bibitem[Takeda \& Rasio(2005)]{tak05}Takeda, G., \& Rasio, F.\ A. 2005, \apj, 627, 1001
605:
606: \bibitem[Valenti \& Fischer(2005)]{val05}Valenti, J.\ A., \& Fischer, D.\ A. 2005, \apjs, 159, 141
607:
608: \bibitem[Whitmire \& Jackson(1984)]{whi84}Whitmire, D.\ R., \& Jackson, A.\ A. 1984, Nature, 308, 713
609:
610: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2001)]{wil01}Wilson, J.\ C., Kirkpatrick, J.\ D.,
611: Gizis, J.\ E., Skrutskie, M.\ F., Monet, D.\ G., \& Houck, J.\ R. 2001, \aj,
612: 122, 1989
613:
614: \bibitem[Wright et al.(2004)]{wri04}Wright, J.\ T., Marcy, G.\ W., Butler, R.\ P., \& Vogt, S.\ S. 2004, \apjs, 152, 261
615:
616:
617:
618: \end{thebibliography}
619:
620:
621: \clearpage
622:
623: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
624: \tabletypesize{\small}
625: \tablecaption{Derived Physical Properties of {\namesrc}B.}
626: \tablewidth{0pt}
627: \tablehead{
628: \colhead{Parameter} &
629: \colhead{[M/H] = 0.00} &
630: \colhead{[M/H] = 0.08} &
631: \colhead{[M/H] = 0.12\tablenotemark{a}} &
632: \colhead{[M/H] = 0.16} &
633: \colhead{[M/H] = 0.24} \\
634: }
635: \startdata
636: {\teff}~(K) & 810$\pm$30 & 790$\pm$30 & 790$\pm$30 & 790$\pm$30 & 780$\pm$40 \\
637: {\logg}~(cgs) & 4.7$\pm$0.2 & 4.9$\pm$0.2 & 5.0$\pm$0.2 & 5.0$\pm$0.2 & 5.2$\pm$0.2 \\
638: Mass~(M$_{\sun}$) & 0.020$\pm$0.005 & 0.027$\pm$0.007 & 0.032$\pm$0.008 & 0.035$\pm$0.011 & 0.047$\pm$0.013 \\
639: Age (Gyr) & 0.4--1.2 & 0.7--2.8 & 1.0--3.7 & 1.0--4.7 & 2.6--9.3 \\
640: \enddata
641: \tablenotetext{a}{\citet{san04} derive a metallicity for the primary of [Fe/H] = 0.12$\pm$0.04.}
642: \end{deluxetable}
643:
644:
645: \clearpage
646:
647: \begin{figure}
648: \plotone{f1.eps}
649: \caption{From top to bottom, normalized
650: near-infrared spectra of the T7.5 companion Gliese~570D,
651: {\namesrc}B and the T8 field brown dwarf 2MASS~0415-0935, all obtained
652: with SpeX on IRTF.
653: All spectra are normalized at 1.27~$\micron$ and offset by
654: constants (dotted lines). Major spectral features are noted;
655: the $\oplus$ symbols designate regions of strong telluric absorption.
656: \label{fig_spectra}}
657: \end{figure}
658:
659: \clearpage
660:
661: \begin{figure}
662: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
663: \caption{Phase spaces of {\teff} and {\logg} constrained
664: for {\namesrc}B by
665: the indices {\water}-J and K/H using the technique of BBK for
666: metallicities [M/H] = 0.0 (left) and 0.12 (right). Model indices
667: are measured from calculations by \citet{bur06} and calibrated
668: to observations of Gliese~570D. The intersecting
669: cross-hatched regions
670: provide robust constraints on {\teff} and {\logg}.
671: Note the
672: higher gravity constraint derived for the higher metallicity (see also Table 1).
673: \label{fig_tg}}
674: \end{figure}
675:
676: \begin{figure}
677: \plotone{f3.eps}
678: \caption{Comparison of the absolute flux-calibrated
679: spectrum of {\namesrc}B (black line) to two {\teff} = 800~K
680: spectral models from \citet{bur06}: {\logg} = 4.7 and [M/H] = 0.0
681: (red dashed line), and {\logg} = 5.2 and [M/H] = 0.12 (blue triple-dot
682: dashed line). Flux calibration of the {\namesrc}B spectrum is based on
683: $J$-band photometry from \citet[16.16$\pm$0.03]{luh06} and the parallax of the primary
684: as measured by HIPPARCOS \citep[$\pi$ = 90.0$\pm$0.7 mas]{pry97}.
685: Uncertainty in this calibration at the $J$-band peak is indicated by
686: the error bar.
687: Note the agreement between the data and the [M/H] = 0.12 model.
688: \label{fig_model}}
689: \end{figure}
690:
691:
692: \end{document}
693: