1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2:
3: %%% PREAMBLE MATTER
4:
5: \usepackage{asp2004}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: \usepackage{lscape}
8: \usepackage{graphicx}
9: \usepackage{subfigure}
10:
11: \markboth{Gianninas, Bergeron, and Fontaine}{Progress Report on the Empiricial ZZ Ceti Instability Strip} %%% Fill in authors' names and short running title
12:
13: \pagestyle{myheadings}
14: \setcounter{equation}{0}
15: \setcounter{figure}{0}
16: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
17: \setcounter{section}{0}
18: \setcounter{table}{0}
19:
20: %%% MAIN PART OF DOCUMENT
21:
22: \begin{document}
23: \title{A Progress Report on the Empirical Determination of the ZZ Ceti Instability Strip} %%% Fill in title
24: \author{A. Gianninas, P. Bergeron, and G. Fontaine} %%% Fill in author names
25: \affil{D\'epartement de Physique, Universit\'e de Montr\'eal, C.P. 6128, Succ.
26: Centre-Ville, Montr\'eal, Qu\'ebec, Canada, H3C 3J7} %%% Fill in author affiliations
27:
28: \begin{abstract} %%% Abstract to run on from here.
29: Although the Sloan Digital Sky Survey has permitted the discovery of
30: an increasing number of new ZZ Ceti stars, recent published analyses
31: have shown that there are still many relatively bright (V $<$ 17) ZZ
32: Ceti stars waiting to be found. We will discuss the discovery of
33: several such objects in addition to a number of DA stars in which we
34: detected no photometric variations. These were uncovered as part of an
35: ongoing spectroscopic survey of DA white dwarfs from the McCook \&
36: Sion Catalog. By determining the atmospheric parameters of a large
37: sample of DA stars, we were able to identify objects placed within or
38: near the empirical boundaries of the ZZ Ceti instability strip. By
39: establishing the photometric status of these stars, we can use them in
40: an effort to conclusively pin down the empirical boundaries of the ZZ
41: Ceti instability strip.
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: %%% MAIN BODY OF TEXT GOES HERE. CONSULT "INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS USING
45: %%% LATEX2E MARKUP", SECTIONS 2.3-2.6 FOR HELP WITH EQUATIONS, FIGURES,
46: %%% AND TABLES.
47:
48: %\section{} %%% Top level section head (remove "%" symbol)
49: %\subsection{} %%% Second level section head (remove "%" symbol)
50: %\subsubsection{} %%% Lowest level section head (remove "%" symbol)
51: %\section*{} %%% Unnumbered top level section head (remove "%" symbol)
52: %\subsection*{} %%% Unnumbered second level section head (remove "%" symbol)
53:
54: \section{Ongoing Survey of the McCook \& Sion Catalog}
55:
56: Since the early 1990s, our group in Montreal has been carrying out a
57: systematic study aimed at defining the empirical boundaries of the ZZ
58: Ceti instability strip. We use quantitative time-averaged optical
59: spectroscopy to pin down the locations of candidate stars in the
60: $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log g$ plane, and we follow up on these candidates
61: with ``white light'' fast photometry to determine whether a target
62: pulsates or not. The determination of these boundaries is essential if
63: we are to understand the ZZ Ceti phenomenon as a whole. The question
64: of the purity of the instability strip is also an important issue for
65: several reasons. First, a pure strip implies that ZZ Ceti stars
66: represent an evolutionary phase through which all DA white dwarfs must
67: pass. It is then possible to apply what is learned from
68: asteroseismological studies of these stars to the entire class of DA
69: white dwarfs. Second, knowing the strip is pure allows us to predict
70: the variability of stars that lie within its boundaries.
71:
72: In the last few years, we have undertaken a spectroscopic survey of a
73: subsample of DA white dwarfs from the Catalog of Spectroscopically
74: Identified White Dwarfs of \citet{mccook99}. We thus obtain optical
75: spectra for each star and by fitting the Balmer line profiles using a
76: grid of synthetic spectra generated from detailed model atmospheres we
77: can accurately measure $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$ for each star. It is
78: then possible to identify white dwarfs whose atmospheric parameters
79: place them near or within the ZZ Ceti instability strip. We will
80: discuss here the latest results of this ongoing effort. Indeed,
81: despite the Sloan Digital Sky Survey permitting the discovery of a
82: plethora of new ZZ Ceti stars, there are still relatively bright (V
83: $<$ 17) ZZ Ceti stars to be discovered as we and others
84: \citep{silvotti05,voss06} are finding out.
85:
86: \begin{landscape}
87: \begin{figure}
88: \centering
89: \subfigure[]{\includegraphics[bb=50 35 600 700,height=9.5cm]{lcurves.eps}\label{lcurves}}
90: \subfigure[]{\includegraphics[bb=0 125 575 600,height=8.5cm]{ffts.eps}\label{ffts}}
91: \caption{(a) Light curves of the 6 new ZZ Ceti stars listed in Table
92: \ref{tab1}. Each point represents a sampling time of 10 s. The light
93: curves are expressed in terms of residual amplitude relative to the
94: mean brightness of the star. (b) Fourier (amplitude) spectra for the
95: light curves of the 6 new ZZ Ceti stars in the 0-10 mHz bandpass. The
96: spectrum in the region from 10 mHz to the Nyquist frequency is
97: entirely consistent with noise and is not shown. The amplitude axis is
98: expressed in terms of the percentage variations about the mean
99: brightness of the star.}
100: \end{figure}
101: \end{landscape}
102:
103: \section{Photometric Observations \& Analysis}
104:
105: \begin{table}[!t]
106: \caption{Photometric parameters of the six new ZZ Ceti white dwarfs}\label{tab1}
107: \begin{center}
108: \begin{tabular}{clccc}
109: \hline
110: \hline
111: & & & Amplitude & Dominant \\
112: WD & Name & {\it V} & (\%) & Period (s) \\
113: \hline
114: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Short Period}\\
115: \hline
116: 0036+312 & G132-12 & 16.20 & 0.43 & 212.7 \\
117: 1150$-$153 & EC 11507$-$1519 & 16.00 & 0.77 & 249.6 \\
118: 2148$-$291 & MCT 2148$-$2911 & 16.10 & 1.26 & 260.8 \\
119: \hline
120: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Long Period}\\
121: \hline
122: 0016$-$258 & MCT 0016$-$2553 & 16.10 & 0.81 & 1152.4 \\
123: 0344+073 & KUV 03442+0719 & 16.10 & 0.76 & 1384.9 \\
124: 2336$-$079 & GD 1212 & 13.26 & 0.54 & 1160.7 \\
125: \hline
126: \end{tabular}
127: \end{center}
128: \end{table}
129:
130: We proceeded to secure high-speed photometric measurements for those
131: stars in our spectroscopic survey whose atmospheric parameters placed
132: them inside or near the edges of the known ZZ Ceti instability
133: strip. In all, 6 of these stars turned out to be genuine pulsating DA
134: white dwarfs: ZZ Ceti stars. MCT 2148$-$2911 was observed through a
135: B-band filter on 2005 August 13 with the 3.6 m Canada-France-Hawaii
136: telescope equipped with LAPOUNE, the portable Montr\'eal three-channel
137: photometer. G132-12, MCT 0016$-$2553, KUV~03442+0719, and GD 1212 were
138: observed in ``white'' light during a 5 night run from 2005 October 23
139: to 27 at the Steward Observatory 2.3 m telescope, equipped once again
140: with LAPOUNE. Finally, EC 11507$-$1519 (see also Koester \& Voss,
141: these proceedings) was observed on 2006 March 22 at Steward
142: Observatory with the same telescope and setup. We also observed
143: another candidate star during this last run, WD 1149+057 (PG
144: 1149+058). Unfortunately, due to increasing cloud cover, our light
145: curve for this object was inconclusive. It was later reported as a new
146: ZZ Ceti star by \citet{voss06}. Figure \ref{lcurves} displays the
147: sky-subtracted, extinction-corrected light curves obtained for each
148: star. The resulting Fourier (amplitude) spectra are shown in Figure
149: \ref{ffts}.
150:
151: Summarized in Table \ref{tab1} are the data for the 6 new ZZ Ceti
152: stars split into short and long period variables. We list the $V$
153: magnitude as well as the amplitude and period of the dominant
154: pulsation mode obtained from the corresponding Fourier spectra in
155: Figure \ref{ffts}. We note that the periods of the dominant
156: oscillation modes in the first three stars of Table \ref{tab1}, as
157: well as those of the last three objects, are consistent with the
158: positions of these stars inside but near the blue (short-period
159: pulsators) and red (long-period pulsators) edges of the instability
160: strip, respectively. However, as a curiosity, we also point out that
161: the amplitudes of the detected modes in the three ``red edge''
162: pulsators are not very large, especially for GD 1212. This goes
163: against the general tendency to observe large amplitudes in the cooler
164: objects. Are we observing stars at the very red edge of the strip,
165: basically ``dying off'' in amplitude? Note also the very long period
166: seen in KUV 03442+0719, one of the longest if not the longest one ever
167: detected in a ZZ Ceti star \citep{mukadam06}.
168:
169: To obtain proper time-averaged spectra for ZZ Ceti stars, it is
170: necessary to set the exposure time long enough to cover several
171: pulsation cycles. However, the exposure times for the optical spectra
172: of MCT 0016$-$2553, KUV 03442+0719 and GD 1212 are 1800, 1200 and 600
173: s respectively. By comparing with the dominant periods listed in Table
174: \ref{tab1}, we see that this criterion was not met for these three
175: long-period variables since we did not know a priori that these white
176: dwarfs would turn out to be variable. It will therefore be necessary
177: to acquire new optical spectra for these stars in order to refine our
178: determination of their atmospheric parameters. Consequently, the
179: atmospheric parameters for these objects are considered preliminary
180: \citep{gianninas06}.
181:
182: \begin{table}[!b]
183: \caption{New and revised atmospheric parameters of ZZ Ceti and photometrically constant DA white dwarfs}\label{tab2}
184: \begin{center}
185: \begin{tabular}{clcccc}
186: \hline
187: \hline
188: & $T_{\rm eff}$ & & M & & \\
189: Name & (K) & $\log g$ & ($M_{\odot}$) & $M_{V}$ & Note \\
190: \hline
191: \multicolumn{6}{c}{New ZZ Ceti}\\
192: \hline
193: HS 1249+0426 & 12040 & 8.15 & 0.70 & 11.83 & 1 \\
194: HS 1531+7436 & 12920 & 8.45 & 0.90 & 12.18 & 1 \\
195: HS 1625+1231 & 11730 & 8.15 & 0.70 & 11.89 & 1 \\
196: HS 1824+6000 & 11380 & 7.82 & 0.51 & 11.50 & 1 \\
197: \hline
198: \multicolumn{6}{c}{New Photometrically Constant}\\
199: \hline
200: HS 1253+1033 & 13040 & 7.85 & 0.53 & 11.27 & 2 \\
201: HS 1544+3800 & 13550 & 7.95 & 0.58 & 11.34 & 1 \\
202: HS 1556+1634 & 11972 & 7.44 & 0.35 & 10.89 & 1 \\
203: \hline
204: \multicolumn{6}{c}{Revised ZZ Ceti}\\
205: \hline
206: WD 1149+057 & 11210 & 8.19 & 0.72 & 12.07 & 1,3 \\
207: WD 1349+552 & 12010 & 7.93 & 0.57 & 11.53 & 4 \\
208: WD 1429$-$037 & 11370 & 8.08 & 0.67 & 11.87 & 2,4 \\
209: WD 1541+650 & 11640 & 8.18 & 0.72 & 11.95 & 4 \\
210: \hline
211: \end{tabular}
212: \end{center}
213: Notes. --
214: (1) Photometric status reported in \citet{voss06}
215: (2) Photometric status reported in \citet{silvotti05}
216: (3) Time-averaged spectrum
217: (4) Improvement of S/N (S/N $>$ 70)
218: \end{table}
219:
220: \begin{center}
221: \begin{figure}[!ht]
222: \includegraphics[bb=75 50 575 700,height=12cm,angle=270]{strip.eps}
223: \caption{{Region of the $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log g$ plane containing the ZZ
224: Ceti instability strip. The error bars in the upper right corner
225: represent the average uncertainties of the spectroscopic method in the
226: region of the ZZ Ceti stars (1.2\% in $T_{\rm eff}$ and 0.038 dex in
227: $\log g$)}}\label{strip}
228: \end{figure}
229: \end{center}
230:
231: \section{Latest Spectroscopic Results}
232:
233: During an observing run in 2006 April at the Observatoire du mont
234: M\'egantic, we were able to secure high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)
235: optical spectra for a number of the stars reported by
236: \citet{silvotti05} and \citet{voss06} as either variable or
237: non-variable. We also obtained higher S/N ratio spectra for several ZZ
238: Ceti stars in our sample as well as a properly time-averaged spectrum
239: for the ZZ Ceti star WD 1149+057. The atmospheric parameters we
240: measured for these stars are listed in Table \ref{tab2} along with the
241: stellar masses and absolute visual magnitudes. Our theoretical
242: framework and fitting technique are described at length in
243: \citet{gianninas05}. In this case, we knew beforehand the photometric
244: nature of our targets and thus we set our exposure times long enough
245: to cover at least 3 pulsation cycles for each star.
246:
247: We can now update our previous photometric sample \citep{gianninas06}
248: by appending these 4 new ZZ Ceti white dwarfs and 3 photometrically
249: constant DA stars as well as incorporating the revised values of
250: $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log g$ for the last 4 objects listed in Table
251: \ref{tab2}. Thus, our current view of the empirical ZZ Ceti
252: instability strip is shown in Figure \ref{strip}. The black open and
253: filled circles represent ZZ Ceti stars and photometrically constant DA
254: stars respectively. The bold open circles are the 6 new ZZ Ceti stars
255: from Table 1. The open triangle is the old position of WD 1149+057 in
256: the $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log g$ plane, it is connected to its new location
257: by a straight line. The dashed lines represent our empirical
258: determination of the blue and red edges of the instability strip.
259:
260: It is well known that white dwarfs in this temperature range that are
261: less massive than $\sim$ 0.475 $M_{\odot}$ ($\log g \sim$ 7.75) must
262: necessarily be the product of binary evolution. This limit is
263: represented by the dashed-dotted line in Figure \ref{strip}. Indeed,
264: several of the stars which lie above this line have been discovered as
265: being part of unresolved double degenerate systems
266: \citep{maxted99,maxted00}. In such cases, the atmospheric parameters
267: obtained are an average of the parameters of both components of the
268: system. Thus, the atmospheric parameters for stars that lie above the
269: dashed-dotted line are considered very uncertain and they cannot be
270: used to constrain the boundaries of the instability strip. Conversely,
271: HS 1531+7436, now the hottest ZZ Ceti star in our sample, allows us to
272: pin down the location and slope of the blue edge of the ZZ Ceti
273: instability strip. However, more hot ZZ Ceti stars lying near the
274: empirical blue edge are needed in order to firmly establish its
275: location. Furthermore, since the atmospheric parameters for the new
276: long period variables are preliminary, we have refrained from
277: redefining the empirical red edge. We also notice that the atmospheric
278: parameters derived from a properly time-averaged spectrum of WD
279: 1149+057 place it within the confines of our empirical boundaries. We
280: expect the same result once we have secured new spectra for the new
281: long-period ZZ Ceti stars. Finally, we see that the instability strip
282: remains pure, devoid of any photometrically constant stars within its
283: empirical boundaries.
284:
285: \section{Conclusions \& Future Work}
286:
287: We have discovered 6 new and relatively bright ZZ Ceti stars and have
288: been able to constrain rather well the empirical boundaries of the ZZ
289: Ceti instability strip. This brings us one step closer to an
290: understanding of the ZZ Ceti phenomenon as a whole but there is still
291: work to be done. Our spectroscopic survey of \citet{mccook99} is yet
292: to be completed, with $\sim$ 100 stars for which we still need to
293: acquire spectra. We also need to obtain time-averaged spectra for the
294: long-period variables we discovered. In addition, we want to continue
295: improving the precision of our $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$
296: determinations by ensuring that all our spectra have S/N $>$
297: 70. Finally, with the blue and red edges well constrained, we wish to
298: revisit pulsation theory as well as evolutionary models for DA white
299: dwarfs in order to produce the best match between our empirical result
300: and theoretical predictions.
301:
302: \acknowledgements %%% Text of acknowledgements runs on after this command.
303: We would like to thank the director and staff of Steward
304: Observatory and the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope for the use of
305: their facilities and for supporting LAPOUNE as a visitor
306: instrument. We would also like to acknowledge the financial support of
307: the Royal Astronomical Society. This work was supported in part by the
308: NSERC Canada. A. G. acknowledges the contribution of the Canadian
309: Graduate Scholarships. P. B. is a Cottrell Scholar of Research
310: Corporation. G. F. acknowledges the contribution of the Canada
311: Research Chair Program.
312:
313:
314: %%% THE BIBLIOGRAPHY
315: %%%
316: %%% CONSULT SECTION 3 OF "INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS" FOR HOW TO USE NATBIB.
317: %%% AUTHORS ARE ENCOURAGED TO USE EITHER THE "THEBIBLIOGRAPY" ENVIRONMENT
318: %%% BY UNCOMMENTING (DELETING THE "%" SYMBOL) THE COMMANDS BELOW, OR BY
319: %%% USING THE BIBTEX ENVIRONMENT. TO FIND OUT WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR
320: %%% CONTRIBUTION, CONSULT THE VOLUME EDITORS FOR YOUR PROCEEDINGS.
321: %%%
322:
323: \begin{thebibliography}{}
324: \bibitem[Gianninas et al.(2005)]{gianninas05} Gianninas, A., Bergeron,
325: P., \& Fontaine, G. 2005, \apj, 631, 1100
326: \bibitem[Gianninas et al.(2006)]{gianninas06} Gianninas, A., Bergeron,
327: P., \& Fontaine, G. 2006, \aj, 132, 831
328: \bibitem[Maxted \& Marsh(1999)]{maxted99} Maxted, P. F. L., \& Marsh,
329: T. R. 1999, \mnras, 307, 122
330: \bibitem[Maxted et al.(2000)]{maxted00} Maxted, P. F. L., Marsh, T. R.,
331: \& Moran, C. K. J. 2000, \mnras, 319, 305
332: \bibitem[McCook \& Sion(1999)]{mccook99} McCook, G. P., \& Sion,
333: E. M. 1999, \apjs, 121, 1
334: \bibitem[Mukadam et al.(2006)]{mukadam06} Mukadam, A. S.,
335: Montgomery, M. H., Winget, D. E., Kepler, S. O., \& Clemens,
336: J. C. 2006, \apj, 640, 956
337: \bibitem[Silvotti et al.(2005)]{silvotti05} Silvotti, R., Voss, B.,
338: Bruni, I., Koester, D., Reimers, D., Napiwotzki, R., \& Homeier,
339: D. 2005, \aap, 443, 195
340: \bibitem[Voss et al.(2006)]{voss06} Voss, B., Koester, D., Ostensen,
341: R., Kepler , S. O., Napiwotzki, R., Homeier, D., \& Reimers, D. 2006,
342: \aap, 450, 1061
343: \end{thebibliography}
344:
345: \end{document}
346: