1: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2: %
3: % Authors: Shunji Sasaki + COSMOS Team.
4: % Title : A galaxy Threshing System in the HST COSMOS Field
5: %
6: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7: \newcommand{\minpoint}{\mbox{$'\mskip-4.7mu.\mskip0.8mu$}}
8: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9:
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
12:
13: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
14: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
15: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{et~al.}}
16: \newcommand{\Msol}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}$}}
17: \newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}$}}
18: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{${\bf M_{\odot} }$}}
19: \newcommand{\Lsol}{\mbox{$L_{\odot}$}}
20: \newcommand{\lsun}{\mbox{$L_{\odot}$}}
21: \newcommand{\ergsec}{\mbox{erg s$^{-1}$}}
22: \newcommand{\beam}{\mbox{beam$^{-1}$}}
23: \newcommand{\Mdyn}{\mbox{$M_{\rm dyn}$}}
24: \newcommand{\Mgas}{\mbox{$M_{\rm gas}$}}
25: \newcommand{\HH}{\mbox{H$_2$}}
26: \newcommand{\Mgasfive}{\mbox{$M_{\rm gas}(r<500{\rm pc})$ }}
27: \newcommand{\Halpha}{\mbox{H$\alpha$} }
28: \newcommand{\tm}[1]{\tablenotemark{#1}}
29: \def\deg {{\ifmmode^\circ\else$^\circ$\fi}}
30: \def\Ho {{$H_{0}$} }
31: \def\qo {{$q_{0}$} }
32: \def\kmsMpc {{\ km\ s$^{-1}$\ Mpc$^{-1}$} }
33:
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: % \submitted{}
37:
38: \title{A POTENTIAL GALAXY THRESHING SYSTEM IN THE COSMOS FIELD
39: \altaffilmark{1}
40: }
41:
42: \author{
43: S. S. Sasaki \altaffilmark{2,3},
44: Y. Taniguchi \altaffilmark{3},
45: N. Scoville \altaffilmark{4,5},
46: B. Mobasher \altaffilmark{6},
47: H. Aussel \altaffilmark{7},
48: D. B. Sanders \altaffilmark{8},
49: A. Koekemoer \altaffilmark{6},
50: M. Ajiki \altaffilmark{2},
51: Y. Komiyama \altaffilmark{9},
52: S. Miyazaki \altaffilmark{10},
53: N. Kaifu \altaffilmark{9},
54: H. Karoji \altaffilmark{10},
55: S. Okamura \altaffilmark{11},
56: N. Arimoto \altaffilmark{9},
57: K. Ohta \altaffilmark{12},
58: Y. Shioya \altaffilmark{3},
59: T. Murayama \altaffilmark{2},
60: T. Nagao \altaffilmark{9,13},
61: J. Koda \altaffilmark{4},
62: L. Hainline \altaffilmark{4},
63: A. Renzini \altaffilmark{14},
64: M. Giavalisco \altaffilmark{6},
65: O. LeFevre \altaffilmark{15},
66: C. Impey \altaffilmark{16},
67: M. Elvis \altaffilmark{17},
68: S. Lilly \altaffilmark{18},
69: M. Rich \altaffilmark{19},
70: E. Schinnerer \altaffilmark{20}, \&
71: K. Sheth \altaffilmark{4,21}
72: }
73:
74: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data collected at
75: Subaru Telescope, which is operated by
76: the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.}
77: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science,
78: Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
79: \altaffiltext{3}{Physics Department, Graduate School of Science \&
80: Engineering, Ehime University, 2-5 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan}
81: \altaffiltext{4}{California Institute of Technology, MC 105-24, 1200 East
82: California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}
83: \altaffiltext{5}{Visiting Astronomer, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn
84: Drive, Honolulu, HI, 96822}
85: \altaffiltext{6}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin
86: Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
87: \altaffiltext{7}{Service d'Astrophysique, CEA/Saclay, 91191
88: Gif-sur-Yvette, France}
89: \altaffiltext{8}{Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive,
90: University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822}
91: \altaffiltext{9}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
92: 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
93: \altaffiltext{10}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory,
94: 650 N. A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA}
95: \altaffiltext{11}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
96: The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
97: \altaffiltext{12}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
98: Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
99: \altaffiltext{13}{INAF -- Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri,
100: Largo Enrico Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy}
101: \altaffiltext{14}{European Southern Observatory,
102: Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany}
103: \altaffiltext{15}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille,
104: BP 8, Traverse du Siphon, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France}
105: \altaffiltext{16}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona,
106: 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721}
107: \altaffiltext{17}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
108: 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
109: \altaffiltext{18}{Department of Physics, Swiss Federal Institute
110: of Technology (ETH-Zurich), CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland}
111: \altaffiltext{19}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
112: University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095}
113: \altaffiltext{20}{Max Planck Institut f\"ur Astronomie,
114: K\"onigstuhl 17, Heidelberg, D-69117, Germany}
115: \altaffiltext{21}{Spitzer Science Center, California Institute
116: of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
117:
118:
119: \begin{abstract}
120: We report on the discovery of a new potential galaxy threshing system
121: in the COSMOS 2 square degree field using the prime-focus camera,
122: Suprime-Cam, on the 8.2 m Subaru Telescope.
123: This system consists of a giant elliptical galaxy with
124: $M_V \approx -21.6$ and a tidally disrupted satellite galaxy with
125: $M_V \approx -17.7$ at a photometric redshift of $z \approx 0.08$.
126: This redshift is consistent with the spectroscopic redshift of 0.079
127: for the giant elliptical galaxy obtained from the Sloan Digital
128: Sky Survey (SDSS) archive.
129: The luminosity masses of the two galaxies are
130: $3.7 \times 10^{12} \cal{M}_{\odot}$ and $3.1 \times 10^{9} \cal{M}_{\odot}$,
131: respectively.
132: The distance between the two galaxies is greater than 100 kpc.
133: The two tidal tails emanating from the satellite galaxy extend over 150 kpc.
134: This system would be the second well-defined galaxy
135: threshing system found so far.
136: \end{abstract}
137:
138: \keywords{galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: interaction}
139:
140: \section{INTRODUCTION}
141:
142: Hierarchical clustering
143: scenarios suggest that present day galaxies assembled from
144: much smaller building blocks during the course of their evolution
145: (e.g., Peebles 1993). Recent deep surveys have found small dwarf galaxies
146: (i.e., building blocks) at $z > 2$ (e.g., Pascarelle, Windhorst, \& Keel 1998;
147: Ellis et al. 2001; Taniguchi et al. 2003a; Santos et al. 2004;
148: Kneib et al. 2004; for a review see Taniguchi et al. 2003b).
149: At the present epoch, the assembly process continues
150: with large galaxies capturing their satellite
151: galaxies. In order to understand the mass assembly of
152: galaxies, it is therefore important to investigate such
153: minor merger processes in detail.
154:
155: It is known that most galaxies in the local universe have satellite galaxies
156: (e.g., Zaritsky et al. 1997 and references therein). Satellite galaxies
157: are expected to sink to the center of the potential of their host galaxies
158: due to dynamical friction
159: (Ostriker \& Tremaine 1975; Tremaine 1981); however, satellites with long
160: dynamical friction timescales are still found orbiting their hosts.
161: The satellites suffer from tidal disruption as they orbit
162: in the galaxy's host dark matter halo. Therefore, the kinematic and
163: morphological properties of the satellites can be used to investigate the
164: structure and potential of the host dark matter halo.
165:
166: The recent discovery of ultra compact dwarf (UCDs) galaxies
167: in the Fornax cluster suggests that such tidal disruption processes
168: can yield small satellite galaxies (Drinkwater et al. 2000a, 2000b; Bekki,
169: Couch, \& Drinkwater 2001; Bekki et al. 2003). As dwarf galaxies
170: orbit around the host galaxy,
171: their outer stellar components are tidally removed.
172: This process is also referred to as galaxy threshing.
173: Recently, Forbes et al. (2003) identified the first case of a galaxy
174: threshing system in an early release image of the Advanced Camera for
175: Surveys (ACS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (Tran et al. 2003;
176: de Grijp et al. 2003). The ACS image clearly shows faint, long tidal tails
177: emanating from a satellite galaxy around an edge-on spiral galaxy
178: at $z = 0.145$.
179:
180: Although a pair of tidal tails is often found in major mergers
181: (Arp 1966; Toomre \& Toomre 1973), it is rare to find such tails in
182: on-going minor mergers.
183: In this respect, the discovery of Forbes et al. (2003) provides
184: important information of tidal disruption of satellite galaxies
185: around the host galaxy. Following Bekki et al. (2001)
186: we use the term ''galaxy threshing'' for such on-going,
187: tidally-disrupted satellite galaxies.
188:
189: Here, we present the serendipitous discovery of a new potential galaxy
190: threshing system found in the COSMOS 2-square degree field
191: (Scoville et al. 2006).
192: The most important point is that we find clear evidence for the
193: disruption of a small satellite galaxy. Destroyed systems are often observed,
194: but faint tidal remnants are generally too faint to be detected in most cases.
195: We present the photometric properties of the system and discuss some
196: implications.
197: We adopt a flat universe with $\Omega$$_{\rm matter} = 0.3$,
198: $\Omega$$_{\Lambda} = 0.7$, and $H_0 = 70$ km s$^{-1}$
199: Mpc$^{-1}$ throughout this paper, and use the AB system for optical magnitudes.
200:
201: The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS) is a treasury program on
202: the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), awarded a total of 640 HST orbits,
203: to be carried out in two cycles (320 orbits in cycles 12 and 13 each;
204: Scoville et al. 2006; Koekemoer et al. 2006).
205: This is the largest amount of HST time ever, allocated to a single project.
206: COSMOS is a 2 square degree imaging survey of an equatorial field in
207: $I$(F814W) band, using the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS).
208:
209: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
210:
211: The COSMOS HST survey alone cannot be used to address all scientific
212: questions without additional ground-based and space-based
213: follow-up observations at multiple-wavelength.
214: We have been carrying out optical
215: multi-band imaging surveys of the COSMOS 2-square degree field
216: centered at $\alpha$(J2000) = $10^{\rm h} ~ 00^{\rm m} ~ 28.6^{\rm s}$ and
217: $\delta$(J2000) = $+02^\circ ~ 12' ~ 21.0''$ (Taniguchi et al. 2006;
218: see also Capak et al. 2006) using Suprime-Cam,
219: which consists of $5\times 2$ CCDs with 2k $\times$ 4k pixels and has
220: a pixel scale of $0.''202$ pixel$^{-1}$ (Miyazaki et al. 2002)
221: on the 8.2m Subaru Telescope (Kaifu et al. 2000).
222: During our two observing runs in January and February 2004, we obtained
223: $B$, $V$, $r'$, $i'$, and $z'$ band images of the whole COSMOS field.
224:
225: The individual CCD data were reduced and
226: combined using our own data reduction software
227: (Yagi et al. 2002) and IRAF.
228: The combined images for individual bands were aligned and
229: smoothed with Gaussian kernels to match the atmospheric seeing conditions.
230: The FWHM of the PSF of the final images has been matched to $0".92$
231: corresponding to the FWHM of the PSF in the $z^\prime$ band image
232: which had the worst seeing of all the data.
233: Photometric calibrations are made using spectrophotometric standard stars.
234: Details of the data reduction processes for the COSMOS ACS data are
235: given in Koekemoer et al. (2006).
236:
237: \section{RESULTS}
238:
239: In Figure 1, we show our five broad-band images of the galaxy threshing
240: system. The threshing system is a pair of interacting
241: galaxies labeled A and B in the $B$ band image (Fig. 1).
242: Galaxy A appears to be a giant elliptical galaxy while galaxy B
243: appears to be a small satellite disk galaxy.
244: It is remarkable that very long tidal tails
245: are emanating from galaxy B. These features are quite similar
246: to those found in the first galaxy threshing system reported by
247: Forbes et al. (2003).
248: Although we have not yet obtained optical spectroscopy of galaxies A and B,
249: their physical association appears to be real, and thus this system is
250: the second case of galaxy threshing.
251: In Figure 2, we show an ACS $F814W$ image of this system.
252: In the high resolution HST image, there are many other satellite galaxies
253: around galaxy A. This group has been identified as ID 10203 in SDSS by
254: Merch\'{a}n \& Zandivarez (2005), They are all large, bright
255: galaxies ($r' \sim 16-17$) shown in Figure 3.
256: Note that galaxy B is not contained in the SDSS
257: catalog, because the spectroscopic redshift of galaxy B was not obtained.
258:
259: \subsection{Properties of the Two Galaxies in the Threshing System}
260:
261: In order to study structural properties of the two galaxies in the
262: threshing system, we examine their surface brightness distributions using
263: the IRAF "ellipse" program.
264: In Figure 4, we show the surface brightness profiles of
265: galaxy A as a function of $r^{1/4}$.
266: It follows a de Vaucouleur's $r^{1/4}$ law,
267: suggesting that it is an elliptical galaxy, consistent with the SDSS spectrum.
268: In Figure 5, we show the surface brightness profile of
269: galaxy B as a function of radius.
270: It shows an exponential radial profile suggesting that
271: this galaxy is probably a disk galaxy.
272:
273: Next, we derive the apparent magnitudes of the two galaxies using
274: GALFIT (Peng et al. 2002).
275: We apply a de Vaucouleur's $r^{1/4}$ model for galaxy A
276: and an exponential disk model for galaxy B.
277: Since the central region ($r < 1"$) of galaxy A is saturated
278: in our $i'$ band image, we have masked out this region.
279: The magnitudes and their errors of both galaxies are summarized in Table 1.
280: The scale length of galaxy B and the effective radius of galaxy A are
281: shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.
282:
283: We also give results for the Sersic fitting in Table 4.
284: The Sersic index of galaxy A ranges from $\approx$ 2.5 to
285: $\approx$ 3, being smaller than 4
286: (which corresponds to a de Vaucouleur profile).
287: Note that the central region of galaxy A is saturated in $i'$,
288: and thus the Sersic index may have large uncertainty.
289: On the other hand, galaxy B has Sersic index around 1.4
290: in each filter.
291: These results seem to be basically consistent with our interpretation that
292: galaxy A is an elliptical galaxy while galaxy B is a disk galaxy.
293:
294: At a redshift of 0.08 (corresponding to a luminosity distance of
295: 363.5 Mpc), we estimate an absolute $V$ magnitude (luminosity) of
296: $M_V \sim -21.6 ~ (L_V \sim 3.7 \times 10^{10}L_{V,\odot})$ for galaxy A,
297: and of $M_V \sim -17.7 ~ (L_V \sim 1.0 \times 10^{9}L_{V,\odot})$ for galaxy B.
298:
299: \subsection{Redshift of the Threshing System}
300:
301: We found a spectroscopic redshift of $z=0.079$ for galaxy A
302: (SDSS J100003.2+020146.4) in the SDSS spectroscopic data archive
303: of third data release (Abazajian et al. 2005).
304: Unfortunately, no spectroscopic information on the redshift is
305: available for galaxy B.
306: We derive a photometric redshift for galaxy B using
307: the $\chi^2$ minimizing method (e.g., Lanzetta, Yahil, \&
308: Fern\'{a}ndez-Soto 1996).
309: We generate SED (spectral energy distribution) templates for
310: $0 \le z \le 1.0$ with a redshift bin of $\Delta z = 0.01$ using
311: the population synthesis model GALAXEV (Bruzual \& Charlot 2003).
312: The SEDs of local galaxies are well reproduced by models whose star-formation
313: rate declines exponentially ($\tau$ models); i.e., $SFR \propto \exp(-t/\tau)$,
314: where $t$ is the age of the galaxy and $\tau$ is the time scale of
315: star formation.
316: We adopt $\tau = 1 {\rm Gyr}$ models with a Salpeter initial mass function
317: (a power index of $x=1.35$ and a stellar mass range of
318: $0.01 \le m/M_\odot \le 125$) and solar metallicity, $Z=0.02$.
319: We then calculate SEDs for ages of $t=1$, 2, 3, 4, and 8 Gyr, corresponding to
320: the SED of a starburst, Irr, Scd, Sbc, and elliptical galaxy, respectively.
321: We adopt a visual extinction of $A_V=0$. Note that our threshing
322: system consists of basically nearby galaxies.
323: Therefore, our results should not be affected by metallicity and $A_V$.
324: Applying this method, we obtain
325: a photometric redshift of the galaxy B as $z_{\rm ph}=0.08$,
326: being consistent with the spectroscopic redshift of the galaxy A.
327: For the rest of the paper, we adopt $z =0.08$ for the galaxy threshing system
328: ($1 \arcsec \simeq 1.76 \ \rm{kpc}$ at $z = 0.08$).
329:
330: \subsection{Properties of the Tidal Tails}
331:
332: We investigate the morphological properties of the two tidal tails
333: emanating from galaxy B. As shown in Figure 1,
334: the two long tidal tails are obvious
335: in images of all bands, suggesting that they consist of stellar material.
336: The lengths of the two tidal tails are 58 arcsec for the
337: tail extending towards the galaxy A and 30 arcsec for the counter tail
338: (east of galaxy B).
339: These values correspond to lengths of 102 kpc and 52 kpc,
340: respectively in the plane of the sky.
341:
342: The tail extending toward galaxy A appears to be narrower than
343: the counter tail whose width increases with increasing
344: distance from galaxy B.
345: This property is also seen in the first galaxy threshing system found
346: by Forbes et al. (2003).
347: In order to study this tendency more quantitatively,
348: we examine the surface brightness distributions of the tails.
349: In Figure 6, we show the $i^\prime$-band surface brightness profile
350: perpendicular to the tails for the four spatial positions, a, b, c,
351: and d that are indicated in the right panel of Figure 6.
352: As shown in the left panel of Figure 6, the tail extending to
353: galaxy A is significantly narrower than the counter one.
354: The tail widths measured at 3$\sigma$ and 5$\sigma$ noise level
355: for each position are given in Table 5.
356: The width at position d exceeds 10 kpc even then it is measured at the
357: 5$\sigma$ noise level. However, the width of the tail extending to
358: galaxy A is only $\simeq$ 6 - 7 kpc.
359:
360: There are some knotty structures in the tidal tails. It is likely
361: that some of these may be tidal dwarf candidates (e.g., Zwicky 1956; Schweizer
362: 1978; Barnes \& Hernquist 1992; Yoshida, Taniguchi, \& Murayama 1994;
363: Duc \& Mirabel 1998 and references therein).
364: Future spectroscopic identification will be necessary to confirm them.
365:
366: We estimate the mean surface brightness of the tidal tails
367: in a sky area above $1.5\sigma$ of the surface brightness in each band.
368: The errors are estimated using following relation;
369: \[
370: \sigma^2({\rm{mean\ counts/pixel}}) = \frac{({\rm{mean\ counts/pixel}}) + \sigma^2_{{\rm{background}}}}{N}.
371: \]
372: $N$ is the total number of pixels of tidal tail,
373: and $\sigma^2_{\rm{background}}$ is $1 \sigma$ sky background noise.
374: The results are given in Table 6.
375: The mean surface brightness is fainter by $\approx$ 1 magnitude than
376: that of the tail found by Forbes et al. (2003).
377:
378: We also estimate the total magnitude of the tidal tails in each band.
379: Errors are estimated using following relation;
380: \[
381: \sigma^2({\rm{total\ counts}}) = {\rm{Total\ counts}} + N \times \sigma^2_{{\rm{background}}}.
382: \]
383: The results are given in Table 6.
384: It is found that the magnitude of the tails is comparable to
385: that of galaxy B in each band.
386:
387: In Figure 7, we show the $B - r^\prime$ color distribution in the
388: galaxy threshing system. The mean $B - r^\prime$ color of galaxy A
389: is $1.37 \pm 0.06$, while, that of galaxy B is $1.02 \pm 0.07$.
390: There is a small color difference between the
391: main body of galaxy B and the two tidal tails.
392: This suggests that stars located in the tidal tails
393: were dispersed from the main body of galaxy B,
394: providing strong evidence that galaxy threshing has been occurring
395: in this system.
396: The total magnitude of the tidal tails is comparable to that of
397: the main body of galaxy B. We estimated that the luminosity of galaxy B
398: is $L_V \sim (1.03 \pm 9.48\times10^{-5}) \times 10^9 L_{V,\odot}$,
399: and that of the tail is
400: $L_V \sim (0.94 \pm 2.16\times10^{-3}) \times 10^9 L_{V,\odot}$.
401: These luminosities are nearly the same. This suggests that
402: galaxy B lost about half of its
403: former mass during the (on-going) threshing event.
404:
405: \subsection{Dynamical Properties of the Galaxy Threshing System}
406:
407: We assume that galaxy A has a
408: mass-to-light ratio of 10 typical for an elliptical galaxies
409: and 3 for galaxy B.
410: Given the $V$-band luminosity in section 3.1, we obtain
411: $M_{\rm A} \simeq 3.7 \times 10^{12} \cal{M_{\odot}}$ and
412: $M_{\rm B} \simeq 3.1 \times 10^{9} \cal{M_{\odot}}$
413: for A and B, respectively.
414:
415: Next, we estimate the probable pericenter distance ($r_{\rm p}$) for the
416: galaxy threshing event.
417: As shown in Figure 5, galaxy B shows an exponential surface
418: brightness profile for $r \lesssim 2.9$ arcsec.
419: If we assume that the mass outside of this radius has been
420: expelled during the previous encounter between the two galaxies,
421: and we use the equation of tidal radius as a rough guide of the pericenter
422: distance, we can then estimate the pericenter as follows,
423: \[
424: r_{\rm p} \simeq r \times \left(\frac{2 \cal{M}}{m}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}.
425: \]
426: Using the derived masses of the two galaxies,
427: we obtain a pericenter distance of $r_{\rm p} \simeq 68$ kpc.
428: Bekki et al. (2003) made general numerical simulations of
429: a galaxy threshing systems with $r_{\rm p} = 65$ kpc.
430: Mayer et al. (2001) used a similar value, $r_{\rm p} = 75$ kpc.
431: Our estimate is consistent with the results of
432: these numerical simulations.
433:
434: The projected separation between two galaxies is 102 kpc.
435: If we adopt an average relative velocity between the two galaxies
436: of 200 km s$^{-1}$, we find that the previous encounter occurred
437: $\tau \sim 5 \times 10^{8}\left(v\ /\ 200 \ \rm{km \ s}^{-1}\right)^{-1}$
438: yrs ago.
439:
440: Galaxy B found in this study will merge into galaxy A
441: after a few billion years after (see Bekki et al. 2001). Even in a
442: facial phase of such minor mergers, faint remnants could be found around
443: the host galaxy.
444:
445: Recently, morphological evidence for such a final phase
446: of minor mergers has been found around field red elliptical galaxies
447: (van Dokkum 2005). Deep optical imaging survey for ordinary-looking
448: galaxies should provide more information on the global, and dynamical
449: evolution of galaxies.
450:
451:
452: \section{Concluding Remarks}
453:
454: In this paper, we have presented the discovery of a new potential galaxy
455: threshing system. Although merging systems and interacting systems are
456: often observed, it is rare to find faint tidal tails in
457: on-going minor mergers because their tidal tails are generally
458: too faint to be detected.
459: Our discovery is important because we find clear
460: evidence for the disruption of a small satellite galaxy.
461: This is only the second well-defined galaxy threshing system found
462: so far.
463:
464: The HST COSMOS Treasury program was supported through NASA grant
465: HST-GO-09822. We wish to thank Tony Roman, Denise Taylor, and David
466: Soderblom for their assistance in planning and scheduling of the
467: extensive COSMOS observations.
468: We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the entire COSMOS collaboration
469: consisting of more than 70 scientists.
470: More information on the COSMOS survey is available \\ at
471: {\bf \url{http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~cosmos}}. It is a pleasure the
472: acknowledge the excellent services provided by the NASA IPAC/IRSA
473: staff (Anastasia Laity, Anastasia Alexov, Bruce Berriman and John Good)
474: in providing on-line archive and server capabilities for the COSMOS datasets.
475: The COSMOS Science meeting in May 2005 was supported in part by
476: the NSF through grant OISE-0456439. We would like to thank the
477: Subaru Telescope staff for their invaluable assistance.
478: IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is
479: distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory,
480: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research
481: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
482: Science Foundation.
483: This work was financially supported in part by the Ministry
484: of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (Nos. 10044052
485: and 10304013), and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
486: (15340059 and 17253001). SSS and TN are financially supported by the
487: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through JSPS Research
488: Fellowship for Young Scientists.
489:
490:
491: \clearpage
492:
493: %-----------------------------------------------------
494: % Table 1
495: %-----------------------------------------------------
496: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
497: \tablenum{1}
498: \scriptsize
499: \tablecaption{Basic properties of the threshing system. Magnitudes and
500: their errors are derived using GALFIT. }
501: \tablewidth{0pt}
502: \tablehead{
503: \colhead{Name} &
504: \colhead{RA(J2000)} &
505: \colhead{DEC(J2000)} &
506: \colhead{$B$} &
507: \colhead{$V$} &
508: \colhead{$r'$} &
509: \colhead{$i'$} &
510: \colhead{$z'$}
511: }
512: \startdata
513: J095959.6+020206(B) & 9 59 59.61 & +2 02 06.6 & 20.87 & 20.15 & 19.85 & 19.56 & 19.28\\
514: & & & \small{$\pm 0.01$} & \small{$\pm 0.01$} & \small{$\pm 0.01$} & \small{$\pm 0.01$} & \small{$\pm 0.01$}\\
515: \\
516: J100003.2+020146(A) & 10 00 03.23 & +2 01 46.5 & 17.29 & 16.33 & 15.92 & 15.48 & 15.21\\
517: & & & \small{$\pm 0.00$} & \small{$\pm 0.00$} & \small{$\pm 0.00$} & \small{$\pm 0.00$} & \small{$\pm 0.00$}\\
518: \enddata
519: \end{deluxetable}
520:
521: %-----------------------------------------------------
522: % Table 2
523: %-----------------------------------------------------
524:
525: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
526: \tablenum{2}
527: \footnotesize
528: \tablecaption{Scale length of the threshed galaxy (galaxy B).
529: These values are derived using GALFIT.}
530: \tablewidth{0pt}
531: \tablehead{
532: \colhead{Name} &
533: \colhead{} &
534: \colhead{$B$} &
535: \colhead{$V$} &
536: \colhead{$r'$} &
537: \colhead{$i'$} &
538: \colhead{$z'$}
539: }
540: \startdata
541: J095959.6+020206 & $R_{\rm{s}} $(arcsec)& 0.50 & 0.58 & 0.56 & 0.53 & 0.57\\
542: & $R_{\rm{s}}$(kpc) & 0.88 & 1.02 & 0.99 & 0.93 & 1.00\\
543: \enddata
544: \end{deluxetable}
545:
546: %-----------------------------------------------------
547: % Table 3
548: %-----------------------------------------------------
549:
550: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
551: \tablenum{3}
552: \scriptsize
553: \tablecaption{Effective radius of the threshing galaxy (galaxy A).
554: These values were derived using GALFIT.}
555: \tablewidth{0pt}
556: \tablehead{
557: \colhead{Name} &
558: \colhead{} &
559: \colhead{$B$} &
560: \colhead{$V$} &
561: \colhead{$r'$} &
562: \colhead{$i'$} &
563: \colhead{$z'$}
564: }
565: \startdata
566: J100003.2+020146 & $R_{\rm{e}} $(arcsec) & 3.29 & 3.00 & 3.20 & 2.34 & 4.12\\
567: & $R_{\rm{e}} $(kpc) & 5.97 & 5.29 & 5.64 & 4.12 & 5.16\\
568: \enddata
569: \end{deluxetable}
570:
571: %-----------------------------------------------------
572: % Table 4
573: %-----------------------------------------------------
574:
575: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
576: \tablenum{4}
577: \footnotesize
578: \tablecaption{Sersic parameter of both galaxies.
579: These values are derived using GALFIT. Note that the central region
580: ($r < 1$ arcsec) of galaxy A is saturated in $i'$.}
581: \tablewidth{0pt}
582: \tablehead{
583: \colhead{Name} &
584: \colhead{$B$} &
585: \colhead{$V$} &
586: \colhead{$r'$} &
587: \colhead{$i'$} &
588: \colhead{$z'$}
589: }
590: \startdata
591: galaxy A & 2.91 & 2.56 & 2.69 & 1.80 & 2.57\\
592: galaxy B & 1.41 & 1.33 & 1.46 & 1.47 & 1.50\\
593: \enddata
594: \end{deluxetable}
595:
596: %-----------------------------------------------------
597: % Table 5
598: %-----------------------------------------------------
599:
600: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
601: \tablenum{5}
602: \footnotesize
603: \tablecaption{Width of the tidal tails.
604: The positions of the cuts across the tidal tails are indicated in Fig.6.}
605: \tablewidth{0pt}
606: \tablehead{
607: \colhead{} &
608: \colhead{} &
609: \colhead{a} &
610: \colhead{b} &
611: \colhead{c} &
612: \colhead{d}
613: }
614: \startdata
615: 3$\sigma $ & (kpc) & $7.6^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ & $7.9^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ & $11.8^{+1.1}_{-1.2}$ & $12.3^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ \\
616: & (arcsec) & $4.3^{+0.0}_{-0.1}$ & $4.5^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ & $6.7^{+0.7}_{-0.7}$ & $7.0^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ \\
617: \\
618: 5$\sigma$ & (kpc) &$6.4^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & $5.5^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ & $8.5^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$ & $10.3^{+0.3}_{-0.5}$ \\
619: & (arcsec) & $3.6^{+0.0}_{-0.0}$ & $3.1^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & $4.8^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ & $5.9^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$ \\
620: \enddata
621: \end{deluxetable}
622:
623: %-----------------------------------------------------
624: % Table 6
625: %-----------------------------------------------------
626:
627: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
628: \tablenum{6}
629: \footnotesize
630: \tablecaption{Properties of the tidal tails.}
631: \tablewidth{0pt}
632: \tablehead{
633: \colhead{} &
634: \colhead{$B$} &
635: \colhead{$V$} &
636: \colhead{$r'$} &
637: \colhead{$i'$} &
638: \colhead{$z'$}\\
639: }
640: \startdata
641: \small{Mean surface brightness (mag/arcsec$^2$)}& \small{27.90} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.08} & \small{27.30} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.04} & \small{27.11} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.07} & \small{26.84} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.04} & \small{26.29} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.05} \\
642: \small{Total magnitude (mag)} & \small{20.91} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.07} & \small{20.18} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.05} & \small{19.82} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.05} & \small{19.66} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.04} & \small{19.23} \tiny{$\pm$ 0.05} \\
643: \small{Background (mag/arcsec$^2$)} & \small{29.89} & \small{29.39} & \small{29.39} & \small{28.98} & \small{28.05}
644: \enddata
645: \end{deluxetable}
646:
647: \clearpage
648:
649: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
650: \begin{references}
651: \reference{1}{Abazajian, K., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1755}
652: \reference{1}{Arp, H. 1966, ApJS, 14, 1}
653: \reference{1}{Barnes, S. A., and Hernquist, L. 1992, Nature, 360, 715}
654: \reference{1}{Bekki, K., Couch, W. J., \& Drinkwater, M. J. 2001, ApJ, 552, L105}
655: \reference{1}{Bekki, K., Couch, W. J., Drinkwater, M. J., \& Shioya, Y.
656: 2003, MNRAS, 344, 399}
657: \reference{1}{Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., \& Tarenghi, M. 1984, AJ, 89, 64}
658: \reference{1}{Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000}
659: \reference{1}{Capak P., et al. 2006, ApJS, this issue}
660: \reference{1}{Coleman G. D., Wu C. -C., \& Weedman D. W. 1980, ApJS, 43, 393}
661: \reference{1}{de Grijp, R., Lee, J., Clemencia, M., \& Fritze-Alvensleben, U.
662: 2003, New Astronomy, 8, 155}
663: \reference{1}{Drinkwater, M. J., et al. 2000a, A\&A, 355, 900}
664: \reference{1}{Drinkwater, M. J., Jones, J. B., Gregg, M. D., \& Phillipps, S.
665: 2000b, PASA, 17, 227}
666: \reference{1}{Duc, P. A., \& Mirabel, I. F. 1998, A\&A, 333, 81}
667: \reference{1}{Ellis, R., Santos, M. R., Kneib, J.-P., \& Kuijken, K. 2001, ApJ, 560, L119}
668: \reference{1}{Forbes, D. A., Beasley, M. A., Bekki, K., Brodie, J. P., \&
669: Strader, J. 2003, Science, 301, 1217}
670: \reference{1}{Fukugita, M., Shimasaku, K., \& Ichikawa, T. 1995, PASP, 107, 945}
671: \reference{1}{Kaifu, N., et al. 2000, PASJ, 52, 1}
672: \reference{1}{Kinney, A., Calzetta, D., Bohlin, R., et al. 1996, ApJ, 467, 38}
673: \reference{1}{Kneib, J. -P., Ellis, R. S., Santos, R. S., \& Richard, J.
674: 2004, ApJ, 607, 697}
675: \reference{1}{Koekemoer A., et al. 2006, ApJS, this issue}
676: \reference{1}{Lanzetta, Yahil, \& Fern\'{a}ndez-Soto 1996, Nature, 381, 759}
677: \reference{1}{Merch\'{a}n E. M., Zandivarez, A. 2005, ApJ, 630, 759}
678: \reference{1}{Miyazaki, S., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 833}
679: \reference{1}{Ostriker, J. P., \& Tremaine, S. 1975, ApJ, 202, L113}
680: \reference{1}{Pascarelle, S. M., Windhorst, R. A. \& Keel, W. C. 1998, AJ, 116, 2659}
681: \reference{1}{Peebles, P. J. E. 1993, Principles of Physical Cosmology
682: (Princeton University Press)}
683: \reference{1}{Peng, Y. C., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 266}
684: \reference{1}{Santos, M. R., Ellis, R. S., Kneib, J. -P., Richard, J., \&
685: Kuijken, K. 2004, ApJ, 606, 683}
686: \reference{1}{Schweizer, F. 1978, in Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies,
687: ed. Berkhuijsen, E. M. \& Wieleinski, R. (Reidel, Dordrecht), 279}
688: \reference{1}{Scoville, N. Z., et al. 2006, ApJS, this issue}
689: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., et al. 2003a, ApJ, 585, L97}
690: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., Shioya, Y., Fujita, S. S., Nagao, T., Murayama, T., \&
691: Ajiki, M. 2003b, JKAS, 36, 123 (astro-ph/0306409); Erratum, JKAS, 36, 283}
692: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., et al. 2006, ApJS, this issue}
693: \reference{1}{Toomre, A. \& Toomre J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623}
694: \reference{1}{Tran, H., et al. 2003, ApJ, 585, 750}
695: \reference{1}{Tremaine, S. 1981, in The Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies,
696: ed. S. M. Fall, \& D. Lynden-Bell (Cambridge: Cambridge University
697: Press), 67}
698: \reference{1}{van Dokkum, P. G. 2005, AJ, 130, 2647}
699: \reference{1}{Yagi M., Kashikawa, N., Sekiguchi, M., Doi, M., Yasuda, N.,
700: Shimasaku, K., \& Okamura, S. 2002, AJ, 123, 66}
701: \reference{1}{Yoshida, M., Taniguchi, Y., \& Murayama, T. 1994, PASJ, 46, L195}
702: \reference{1}{Zaritsky, D., Smith, R., Frenk, C., \& White, S. D. M. 1997,
703: ApJ, 478, 39}
704: \reference{1}{Zwicky, F. 1956, Multiple Galaxies, Ergenisse Exakten
705: Naturwissenschaften, 29, 344}
706: \end{references}
707:
708: %------------------------------------------------------------------
709:
710: \clearpage
711:
712: \vspace{1cm}
713: \vspace{0.5cm}
714:
715:
716: \noindent {\bf Fig. 1} Suprime-Cam images of the threshing system.
717: Image size of these figures are $2.3' \times 1.5'$
718: (corresponds to 243 kpc $\times$ 158 kpc at $z \simeq 0.08$).
719: \begin{figure}[h]
720: \epsscale{0.70}
721: \plotone{f1.eps}
722: \end{figure}
723:
724: \noindent {\bf Fig. 2} HST ACS $I-814$ band image of the galaxy threshing
725: system. Image size of this figure is $2.3' \times 1.5'$.
726: \begin{figure}[ht]
727: \begin{center}
728: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth,angle=-90]{f2.eps}
729: \end{center}
730: \end{figure}
731:
732: \clearpage
733: \noindent {\bf Fig. 3} Circled galaxies are the member of the galaxy group.
734: They were identified by Merch\'{a}n \& Zandivarez (2005).
735: \begin{figure}[ht]
736: \begin{center}
737: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,angle=-90]{f3.eps}
738: \end{center}
739: \end{figure}
740:
741: \clearpage
742: \noindent {\bf Fig. 4} Surface brightness profiles of the threshing galaxy.
743: Note that the central region ($< 1"$) of the threshing galaxy is saturated
744: in $i'$ and has been masked out. We also show the $1 \sigma$ of sky
745: background and seeing radius ($= 0.46"$). The values of background are shown
746: in the Table 6.
747: \begin{figure}[ht]
748: \begin{center}
749: \includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth,angle=-90]{f4.eps}
750: \end{center}
751: \end{figure}
752:
753: \noindent {\bf Fig. 5} Surface brightness profiles of the threshed galaxy.
754: We also show the $1 \sigma$ of sky background and seeing radius ($= 0.46"$).
755: The values of background are shown in the Table 6.
756: \begin{figure}[ht]
757: \begin{center}
758: \includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth,angle=-90]{f5.eps}
759: \end{center}
760: \end{figure}
761:
762: \clearpage
763: \noindent {\bf Fig. 6} Surface brightness distribution perpendicular to the
764: extent of the tidal tails as a function of position along the tails.
765: The investigated spatial positions are marked by bars in the right panel.
766: The surface brightness profile at each position is shown in the left panel.
767: \begin{figure}[htp]
768: \epsscale{0.40}
769: \plotone{f6-1.eps}\plotone{f6-2.eps}
770: \end{figure}
771:
772: \noindent {\bf Fig. 7} $B-r'$ color map. Image size of this figure is
773: $2.3' \times 1.5'$. Outer parts of the threshing system (in particular,
774: galaxy A) show redder colors. However, this feature is due to poor
775: signal-to-noise ratio because of much lower surface brightness.
776: \begin{figure}[ht]
777: \epsscale{0.5}
778: \plotone{f7.eps}
779: \end{figure}
780:
781: \end{document}
782: