1: %\documentclass[12pt]{aastex}
2:
3: %----------------------
4: %--- ApJ submission ---
5: %----------------------
6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8:
9: %\input{mymargins.tex}
10: %
11:
12: %--------------------
13: %--- Emmulate ApJ ---
14: %--------------------
15: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
16: \usepackage{mathptmx}
17: %\usepackage{ulem}
18:
19:
20: %\documentclass{aastex}
21: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,mathptmx}
22: % old:
23: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,times,mathptm}
24: %
25: %\topmargin=1.5cm % for use when printing on a letter size (USA)
26: %
27:
28: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
29: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
30: \def\ltorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu
31: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
32:
33:
34: % \received{RECEIPT DATE}
35: % \revised{REVISION DATE}
36: % \accepted{ACCEPT DATE}
37: % \ccc{code}
38: % \cpright{type}{year}
39:
40: % \journalid{VOL}{JOURNAL DATE}
41: % \articleid{START PAGE}{END PAGE}
42: % \paperid{MANUSCRIPT ID}
43:
44: %\journalinfo{The Astrophysical Journal,
45: %14?: ??1--?20, 2003 Month, astro-ph/0612408}
46: %\slugcomment{Received 2003 January 17; accepted 2003 March 29}
47:
48: \slugcomment{Draft of \today}
49:
50: \shorttitle{SN~2006gy}
51:
52: \shortauthors{Ofek et al.}
53:
54:
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: \title{SN~2006gy: An extremely luminous supernova in the galaxy NGC\,1260}
59: \author{
60: E.~O.~Ofek\altaffilmark{1},
61: P.~B.~Cameron\altaffilmark{1},
62: M.~M.~Kasliwal\altaffilmark{1},
63: A.~Gal-Yam\altaffilmark{1},
64: A.~Rau\altaffilmark{1},
65: S.~R.~Kulkarni\altaffilmark{1},
66: D.~A.~Frail\altaffilmark{2},
67: P.~Chandra\altaffilmark{2}$^{,}$\altaffilmark{3},
68: S.~B.~Cenko\altaffilmark{1},
69: A.~M.~Soderberg\altaffilmark{1}
70: \&\
71: S.~Immler\altaffilmark{4},
72: }
73: \altaffiltext{1}{Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}
74: \altaffiltext{2}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville VA 22903}
75: \altaffiltext{3}{University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA 22904}
76: \altaffiltext{4}{NASA/CRESST/GSFC, Code 662, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
77:
78:
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81:
82: With an extinction-corrected V-band peak absolute magnitude of
83: about $-22$, supernova (SN)~2006gy is probably the brightest SN
84: ever observed.
85: We report on multi-wavelength observations of this
86: SN and its environment.
87: Our spectroscopy shows
88: an H$\alpha$ emission line
89: as well as absorption features which
90: may be identified as \ion{Si}{2} lines
91: at low expansion velocity.
92: The high peak luminosity, the slow rise to maximum,
93: and the narrow H$\alpha$ line
94: are similar to those observed in
95: hybrid type-Ia/IIn (also called IIa) SNe.
96: %
97: The host galaxy, NGC\,1260,
98: is dominated by an old stellar population with solar metallicity.
99: However, our high resolution adaptive optics images reveal
100: a dust lane in this galaxy,
101: and there appears to be an
102: \ion{H}{2} region in the vicinity of the SN.
103: %
104: The extra-ordinarily large peak luminosity,
105: $\sim 3\times 10^{44}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$, demands a dense
106: circum-stellar medium, regardless of the mass of the
107: progenitor star. The inferred mass loss rate of the
108: progenitor is
109: $\sim0.1\,$M$_{\odot}\,$yr$^{-1}$
110: over a period of $\sim10\,$yr prior to explosion.
111: Such an high mass-loss rate may be the result
112: of a binary star common envelope ejection.
113: The total radiated energy in the first two months
114: is about $1.1\times 10^{51}\,$erg, which is only a factor of two
115: less than that available from a super-Chandrasekhar Ia explosion.
116: Therefore, given the presence of a star forming region in
117: the vicinity of the SN and the high energy requirements,
118: a plausible scenario is that SN~2006gy
119: is related to the death of a massive star
120: (e.g., pair production SN).
121:
122:
123: \end{abstract}
124:
125:
126: \keywords{
127: supernovae: general -- supernovae: individual (SN~2006gy) -- galaxies: individual (NGC\,1260)}
128:
129:
130: \section{Introduction}
131: \label{Introduction}
132:
133: %--------------------
134: %--- Introduction ---
135: %--------------------
136:
137:
138: %--------------------------------
139: %--- Introduction to SN2006gy ---
140: %--------------------------------
141: SN\,2006gy
142: was discovered by the ROTSE-IIIb telescope at
143: the McDonald Observatory on UT 2006 September 18.3 (Quimby 2006).
144: The supernova (SN) was initially reported
145: $2''$ off the center of NGC\,1260.
146: %
147: Harutyunyan et al. (2006) obtained a spectrum on
148: UT 2006 September 26 and reported
149: a three-component H$\alpha$ emission line:
150: an unresolved narrow line; an intermediate component
151: with
152: Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of
153: $2500\,$km\,s$^{-1}$; and a component with FWHM of $9500\,$km\,s$^{-1}$.
154: They suggested that the event was a type~II SN.
155:
156:
157: Prieto et al. (2006)
158: reported that a spectrum of the SN,
159: obtained eight days after the discovery,
160: was suggestive
161: of a dust-extinguished type-IIn event.
162: However, the Balmer lines were symmetric, which is unusual
163: for SNe in their early phases.
164: %
165: Moreover, after correcting for two magnitudes of extinction
166: (based on observed Na\,I lines), the absolute magnitude
167: is about $-22$.
168: %
169: They further reported that the position of the SN is consistent
170: with the center of the galaxy, suggesting
171: it is more consistent with
172: an eruption of the active galactic nucleus (AGN) of
173: NGC\,1260.
174: %
175: Foley et al. (2006) noted that the SN is offset by about $1''$ from
176: the nucleus of NGC\,1260.
177: This fact along with a spectrum obtained six days after discovery,
178: led them to suggest that SN\,2006gy was a type IIn event.
179:
180: Here we report on
181: multi-wavelength observations of SN\,2006gy.
182: An independent contemporary analysis is presented
183: by Smith et al. (2006).
184:
185:
186: \section{Observations}
187: \label{Obs}
188:
189:
190:
191: %-----------------------
192: %--- P60 Light curve ---
193: %-----------------------
194: We initiated a photometric ($g,r,i,z$) monitoring program with the
195: Palomar 60-inch robotic telescope (Cenko et al. 2006).
196: Not possessing pre-explosion images of NGC\,1260, which are essential
197: for accurate subtraction of the light from the host galaxy, we used
198: archival $R$- and $I$-band images obtained with the
199: Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope\footnote{ING archive: http://casu.ast.cam.ac.uk/casuadc/archives/ingarch}
200: on 1996 January 13 and 1991 December 1, respectively.
201: The $r$- and $i$-band measurements and errors, presented
202: in Fig.~\ref{SN2006gy_LC} and Table~\ref{Tab-Log}
203: were produced by image subtraction using the
204: Common Point-spread-function Method
205: (CPM; Gal-Yam et al. 2004).
206:
207:
208:
209: \begin{figure}
210: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f1.eps}}
211: \caption{$r$-band (filled circles) and $i$-band (empty squares)
212: light curves
213: of SN\,2006gy.
214: Errors include the uncertainty in the absolute
215: calibration. The bottom horizontal axis
216: shows the time relative to the discovery
217: of SN\,2006gy (2006 September 18).
218: \label{SN2006gy_LC}}
219: \end{figure}
220: %
221: \begin{deluxetable}{lll|lll}
222: \tablecolumns{6}
223: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
224: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
225: \tablewidth{0pt}
226: \tablecaption{Log of observations and measurements}
227: \tablehead{
228: \colhead{Date} &
229: \colhead{Tel} &
230: \colhead{Magnitude\tablenotemark{a}} &
231: \colhead{Date} &
232: \colhead{Tel} &
233: \colhead{Magnitude} \\
234: \colhead{UT 2006} &
235: \colhead{\& Band} &
236: \colhead{} &
237: \colhead{UT 2006} &
238: \colhead{\& Band} &
239: \colhead{or Flux\tablenotemark{a}}
240: }
241: \startdata
242: 09-24.9 & P60\tablenotemark{b} $r$ & $14.80\pm0.10$ & 10-30.7 & P60 $i$ & $14.29\pm0.12$\\
243: 09-25.9 & & $14.78\pm0.10$ & 10-31.7 & & $14.30\pm0.12$\\
244: 09-26.7 & & $14.73\pm0.11$ & 11-01.7 & & $14.31\pm0.12$\\
245: 10-05.9 & & $14.45\pm0.10$ & 11-02.8 & & $14.22\pm0.12$\\
246: 10-29.7 & & $14.32\pm0.10$ & 11-08.8 & & $14.30\pm0.12$\\
247: 10-30.7 & & $14.28\pm0.10$ & 11-09.8 & & $14.34\pm0.12$\\
248: 11-09.8 & & $14.40\pm0.10$ & 11-12.0 & & $14.30\pm0.12$\\
249: 11-12.0 & & $14.33\pm0.11$ & 11-01.3 &P200\tablenotemark{c} $J$ & $12.96\pm0.14$\\
250: %
251: 09-24.9 & P60 $i$ & $14.90\pm0.12$ & 11-01.3 &P200 $K_{\rm s}$ & $12.59\pm0.17$\\
252: 09-25.9 & & $14.86\pm0.12$ & & & \\
253: 09-26.7 & & $14.69\pm0.17$ & & & \\
254: 10-05.9 & & $14.53\pm0.12$ & 11-20.4 & VLA X\tablenotemark{d} & $186\pm80\,\mu$Jy \\
255: 10-26.7 & & $14.30\pm0.12$ & 11-20.4 & VLA K\tablenotemark{d} & $59\pm110\,\mu$Jy \\
256: 10-29.7 & & $14.26\pm0.12$ & 11-23.2 & VLA Q\tablenotemark{d} & $56\pm120\,\mu$Jy \\
257: %
258: \enddata
259: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed magnitude or flux density
260: of the SN. Magnitude errors include the uncertainty in absolute calibration, which dominates the errors.
261: To convert specific-flux errors to $3$-$\sigma$ upper limits multiply the errors by $3$.}
262: \tablenotetext{b}{Palomar 60-inch (P60) magnitudes are given in the AB magnitude system.
263: Absolute calibration was performed by fitting the
264: Hipparcos $B_{T}V_{T}$ and 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. 2006)
265: $JHK$ magnitudes of three nearby Tycho-2 (H{\o}g et al. 2000)
266: reference stars to synthetic photometry of
267: stellar spectral templates (Pickles 1998) in the same bands.
268: The best fit spectral template of each star was used
269: to calculate its synthetic magnitudes in the $r$- and $i$-bands.
270: The uncertainty in this calibration process, calculated from the
271: scatter between the zero-points derived from each Tycho-2 star,
272: is about $0.1\,$mag.}
273: \tablenotetext{c}{Palomar 200-inch (P200) IR Vega-based PSF-fitting magnitudes, relative to the 2MASS star 03172629$+$4124103 within the field, as measured with IRAF/DAOPHOT.}
274: \tablenotetext{d}{Center frequency of VLA bands are as follows:
275: 8.4\,GHz (X), 22.5\,GHz (K) and 43.3\,GHz (Q).}
276: %\tablecomments{}
277: \label{Tab-Log}
278: \end{deluxetable}
279: %
280:
281:
282:
283:
284:
285:
286: %---------------
287: %--- Spectra ---
288: %---------------
289: On UT 2006 September 26 and December 18 and 19
290: we obtained spectra using the
291: Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph mounted on the Keck-I 10-m
292: telescope (LRIS; Oke et al. 1995).
293: Spectra were also obtained
294: on UT 2006 October 28.3, 29.4 and November 25.2, using the Double
295: Beam Spectrograph (DBSP) mounted on the Hale 5-m telescope.
296: The spectra are displayed in Fig.~\ref{Spec_DBSP_SN}.
297:
298:
299:
300: \begin{figure}
301: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f2.eps}}
302: \caption{The spectrum of SN\,2006gy after subtracting
303: the scaled S0 template, and correcting
304: for Milky-Way and NGC\,1260 extinction (black line; see text).
305: The blue line shows the same spectrum after subtraction
306: of a third-degree polynomial fitted to the spectrum.
307: The magenta line shows the spectrum of the
308: luminous type-Ia SN\,1991T at nine days post peak brightness,
309: after the same processing.
310: The spectrum of SN\,1991T was redshifted by $\sim8500\,$km\,s$^{-1}$
311: in order that the possible \ion{Si}{2} features in both spectra coincide.
312: A zoom-in on the H$\alpha$ emission line
313: as observed by LRIS and DBSP is shown in the upper inset.
314: The lower inset shows a section of the 2-dimensional Keck
315: spectrum of SN\,2006gy obtained under good seeing conditions
316: on 2006 December 18.
317: The extension in the spatial (vertical) direction is an H$\alpha$ emission
318: near the SN location
319: (as previously reported by Smith et al. 2006).
320: %
321: {\bf Technical details}:
322: For the LRIS spectra,
323: with integration time ranging from 600 to $2400\,$s,
324: we employed
325: the $1\farcs5$ slit with the 400/8500 grating blazed at $7550\,$\AA,
326: and the 600/4000 grism, in the red and blue sides, respectively.
327: One exception is the December 19 spectrum that was obtained using the
328: high-resolution R1200/7500 grating centered on the \ion{Na}{1} lines.
329: %
330: The DBSP observations were obtained with
331: a $1\farcs5$ slit and R158/7500
332: and B600/4000 gratings on the red and blue
333: arms, respectively. The spectrum marked with October 28.9
334: is the sum of
335: four spectra (total integration time of $1500\,$s)
336: obtained during the October run.
337: The integration time for
338: the November DBSP spectrum was $900\,$s.}
339: \label{Spec_DBSP_SN}
340: \end{figure}
341: %
342:
343:
344:
345:
346: %-----------
347: %--- NGS ---
348: %-----------
349: On UT 2006 Nov 1.3 we observed the event with
350: the Adaptive Optics system (Troy et al. 2000)
351: equipped with the Palomar High Angular Resolution Observer
352: (Hayward et al. 2001)
353: camera mounted on the Hale 5-m telescope.
354: We used the
355: %newly installed
356: wavefront reconstruction algorithm --
357: denominator-free centroiding and Bayesian reconstruction (Shelton 1997),
358: which delivered $K_{\rm s}$-band images with
359: $0\farcs1$ FWHM and a Strehl ratio of $\sim15\%$.
360: %
361: We obtained $660\,$s and $300\,$s images in the
362: $K_{\rm s}$ and $J$-bands, respectively, using
363: the high-resolution mode ($25\,$mas\,pix$^{-1}$)
364: and a $240\,$s $K_{\rm s}$-band image using
365: the low-resolution camera ($40\,$mas\,pix$^{-1}$).
366: %
367: Each frame was flat-fielded, background
368: subtracted, and repaired for bad pixels using custom PyRAF
369: software\footnote{PyRAF is a product of Space Telescope Science
370: Institute, which is operated by AURA for NASA.}.
371: %
372: \begin{figure}
373: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f3.eps}}
374: \caption{{\bf Left}:
375: $K_{\rm s}$ band image.
376: The SN (marked) is clearly resolved
377: from the galaxy nucleus. {\bf right}: $J$-band image after subtracting
378: the best fit S\'{e}rsic profile from the galaxy and a Gaussian
379: profile from the SN using GalFit (Peng et al. 2002).
380: The S\'{e}rsic
381: model parameters are as follows: index of $3.7$, an effective radius of
382: $34''$, an axial ratio of $0.51$, and a position angle of $80\,$deg.
383: A dust lane (white band) is seen southward of the galaxy nucleus.
384: %
385: Based on three 2MASS sources,
386: we derived the galaxy nucleus position:
387: $\alpha=03^{h}17^{m}27.^{s}241$, $\delta=+41^{\circ}24^{m}18\farcs55$
388: and the SN position (end numbers):
389: $27^{s}.158$ ($\alpha$) and $18\farcs88$ ($\delta$).
390: %$\alpha=03^{h}17^{m}27.^{s}158$, $\delta=+41^{\circ}24^{m}18\farcs88$ for the SN.
391: The astrometric solution has
392: rms of $0\farcs04$ and $0\farcs01$ in $\alpha$ and $\delta$, respectively.
393: \label{P200_AO}}
394: \end{figure}
395: %
396:
397:
398:
399:
400: %-----------------
401: %--- Swift XRT ---
402: %-----------------
403: The field of SN\,2006gy/NGC\,1260 was observed by the {\it Swift}
404: X-Ray Telescope (XRT) on 2006 October 30 and the {\it Chandra}
405: X-ray Observatory on 2004 December 23 and 2006 November 14\footnote{This
406: latest observation was conducted under Director's discretionary
407: time (PI: Pooley).}.
408: For the {\it Swift} observations,
409: assuming a Galactic neutral
410: Hydrogen column density $N_{H}=1.3\times10^{21}\,$cm$^{-2}$
411: (Dickey \& Lockman 1990),
412: and a power-law spectrum with index $1.8$,
413: %(typical for AGNs),
414: we set a $3$-$\sigma$ upper limit for the flux in
415: the $0.2-10\,$keV band
416: of $<1.8\times10^{-13}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$.
417: %
418: The {\it Chandra} observations reveal a variable source
419: at the position of
420: the nucleus of NGC\,1260. The spatial coincidence lead us to attribute
421: this source to an active galactic nucleus.
422: %
423: In order to constrain the X-ray luminosity of the SN,
424: we fitted the X-ray image with a model containing three components:
425: A narrow Gaussian centered on the galaxy position;
426: a wide Gaussian centered on the galaxy position (i.e., diffuse emission);
427: and a narrow Gaussian centered on the SN position.
428: We find that the SN flux is consistent with zero,
429: and that
430: its flux is $<1.6\times10^{40}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$
431: at the $3$-$\sigma$ confidence level,
432: assuming a photon index of 1.8, a distance of 73\,Mpc to
433: NGC\,1260 and a neutral Hydrogen column density of
434: $N_{H}=6.3\times10^{21}\,$cm$^{-2}$ (in the Galaxy and NGC\,1260).
435: %
436: %------------
437: %--- UVOT ---
438: %------------
439: This field was also observed using the {\it Swift}
440: Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope.
441: We are awaiting
442: late epoch observations in order to properly remove the host
443: contamination.
444:
445:
446:
447: %-----------
448: %--- VLA ---
449: %-----------
450: We performed radio observations of NGC\,1260 with the Very Large Array
451: (VLA)\footnote{The Very Large Array is operated by the National Radio
452: Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National Science Foundation
453: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
454: on 2006 Nov 20 and 23 UT.
455: The observations were obtained in continuum
456: mode with a bandwidth of $2\times50$ MHz. We observed 3C\,48
457: (J0137$+$331) for flux calibration, while phase referencing was
458: performed against J0319$+$415. The data were reduced using
459: the Astronomical Image Processing System.
460: We did~not detect a source at
461: the position of the SN (see Table~\ref{Tab-Log}).
462:
463:
464:
465:
466:
467:
468:
469:
470: \section{Spectral Analysis}
471: \label{Spec}
472:
473: %
474: % DBSP spectrum 061028 % add 10.8 km/s to convert to Heliocentric
475: % H\alpha peak 6690.4
476: % EW = -10A (including P Cyg profile)
477: % Total flux: 1.4e-13 (1.7e-13 without P Cyg).
478: % FWHM = 34.17
479: % minimum of H\alpha P Cyg line 6620A
480: %
481: In the optical spectra we identify two \ion{Na}{1}
482: absorption lines, one of Galactic origin and
483: the other at the redshift of NGC\,1260 ($z=0.019$).
484: %
485: Based on the ratio between the equivalent widths
486: of these two absorption lines (e.g., Munari \& Zwitter 1997),
487: we estimate the total extinction
488: toward SN\,2006gy to be $\sim4.4$ times
489: the Galactic extinction ($E_{B-V}=0.16$; Schlegel et al. 1998),
490: which gives $E_{B-V}\approx0.7$.
491: %
492: The high-resolution spectrum,
493: obtained on 2006 December 19,
494: resolves the \ion{Na}{1} doublet. Based on this spectrum, we find that
495: both the Galactic and NGC\,1260 doublets have similar line ratios
496: and are not saturated.
497: %
498: We note that using the \ion{Na}{1}-extinction correlation
499: derived by Turatto et al. (2003), we find
500: a total $E_{B-V}$ extinction in the range $1$ to $3.5\,$mag.
501: Moreover, the extinction is derived by
502: assuming that all the \ion{Na}{1} absorption
503: is of light emitted by the SN, rather than of light emitted
504: by the host galaxy.
505: %
506: Therefore, the extinction toward SN\,2006gy is
507: uncertain and this issue will require further study.
508: %}
509: %
510: % E_{B-V}=0.74 ->
511: % Johnson: A_V=2.30
512: % A_u=3.61; A_g=2.68; A_r=1.97; A_i=1.47; A_z=1.07;
513: % A_J=0.67; A_H=0.42; A_K=0.26
514: % A_FUV=6.01; A_NUV=6.44
515: % Swift-UVOT: A_V=2.29; A_B=3.02; A_U=3.65;
516: % A_UM2=6.86; A_UW1=4.72; A_UW2=6.57
517: %
518: %NaI - Galactic E_B-V = 0.160 Schlegel et al.(1998)
519: % EW 1.0\pm0.2
520: %
521: %NaI - NGC\,1260
522: % EW 3.6\pm0.1
523: %
524:
525:
526: In Fig.~\ref{Spec_DBSP_SN} we show the DBSP spectrum
527: of SN\,2006gy (black line)
528: after the subtraction of
529: a scaled S0 galaxy template (Kinney et al. 1996).
530: The template was reddened
531: to account for Galactic extinction in the direction
532: of the SN, and
533: scaled so that the
534: synthetic $r-i$ color
535: of the host-subtracted SN
536: spectrum
537: matches the photometrically observed value at the same epoch.
538: %
539: Next, we flux-calibrated the spectrum by requiring its $r$-band
540: synthetic photometry to equal
541: the observed magnitude of the SN at the same epoch.
542: Finally, we corrected the spectrum for
543: extinction,
544: assuming $E_{B-V}\approx0.7\,$mag
545: and $R_{V}=3.08$ (Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis 1989).
546: %
547: From the final spectrum we find, at maximum light,
548: an extinction corrected
549: synthetic V-band magnitude (Vega system) of about $12.4$ mag.
550:
551:
552: Our spectra show an H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ emission lines
553: with a P-cygni profile, characteristic of type-IIn SNe.
554: %
555: %In both DBSP spectra the H$\alpha$ line shows
556: %a P-Cygni profile and
557: %
558: % H alpha DBSP: FWHM=1800km/s
559: % peak @ 6695A
560: % flux ~4x10^-13
561: % P-Cyg minimum @ 6638A
562: % Min2Max velocity = 2550km/s
563: % Accuracy: 370km/s
564: %
565: % H beta DBSP: peak @ 4793A
566: % P-Cyg min @ 4893A
567: % H alpha LRIS: FWHM=910km/s
568: % peak @ 6692.4
569: %
570: %
571: %we also identify the H$\beta$ line.
572: We note that the equivalent width of the H$\alpha$ line
573: is decreasing with time.
574: % and its peak is shifted red-ward.
575: %
576: Interestingly, we detected several absorption features
577: %(Fig.~\ref{Spec_DBSP_SN}),
578: which may be
579: \ion{Si}{2},
580: \ion{S}{2},
581: \ion{Fe}{2}, \ion{Fe}{3} and \ion{Ca}{2} lines.
582: Such lines are usually observed in type-Ia SNe.
583: %in type-Ia SN spectra.
584: %
585: However, we stress that the
586: relative lines strenghts and apparent low expansion
587: velocities (i.e., $\sim 1000$--$2000\,$km\,s$^{-1}$)
588: are peculiar, making
589: line identifications {\it tentative only}.
590: %
591: To emphasize this,
592: we show in Fig.~\ref{Spec_DBSP_SN} the spectrum
593: of SN\,1991T (Filippenko et al. 1992)
594: at nine~days from maximum light redshifted by $8500\,$km\,s$^{-1}$,
595: and the spectrum
596: of SN\,2006gy at 42 days since discovery, after the subtraction
597: of third-degree polynomials fitted to each spectrum.
598: %
599: The lines of SN\,2006gy are narrower and red-shifted
600: relative to these of SN\,1991T,
601: indicating that SN\,2006gy had a lower expansion velocity
602: compared to type-Ia SN.
603:
604:
605: \section{Environment}
606: \label{Env}
607:
608:
609:
610: %-----------------------
611: %--- The host galaxy ---
612: %-----------------------
613: NGC\,1260 is an early-type galaxy within the Perseus cluster of galaxies.
614: Its Heliocentric recession velocity is
615: $5760\,$km\,s$^{-1}$ and its velocity dispersion is
616: $201\pm12\,$km\,s$^{-1}$ (Wegner et al. 2003).
617: %\sout{Adopting a distance of $73$~Mpc to the Perseus cluster}
618: Based on the recession velocity of the cluster
619: the distance modulus to NGC\,1260 is
620: $34.5\,$mag\footnote{Assuming Hubble parameter $H_{0}=72\,$km\,s$^{-1}\,$Mpc$^{-1}$, matter content $\Omega_{m}=0.27$, and dark-energy content of $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73$.}.
621:
622:
623:
624: %------------
625: %--- AGN? ---
626: %------------
627:
628: Our adaptive optics images (Fig.~\ref{P200_AO}) show that
629: SN\,2006gy is located $0\farcs99$ (projected distance $380\,$pc), at a
630: position angle of $290\,$deg, from the nucleus of NGC\,1260.
631: A dust lane,
632: passing about $300\,$pc (projected)
633: from the SN location, is clearly seen
634: in our galaxy-subtracted $J$-band image.
635: Moreover, we confirm the detection by
636: Smith et al. (2006) of an \ion{H}{2} region
637: in the SN vicinity (Fig.~\ref{Spec_DBSP_SN}).
638:
639: The Mg$_2$ index of this galaxy was
640: measured to be in the range $0.24$--$0.27\,$mag
641: (Davis et al. 1987; Wegner et al. 2003).
642: This value, along with the synthetic
643: spectral models of Vazdekis (1999),
644: suggests that the metallicity of NGC\,1260 is
645: not low, [Fe/H]$\ga-0.2$.
646:
647:
648:
649: \section{Discussion}
650: \label{Disc}
651:
652:
653: With estimated peak absolute magnitude of $V\approx-22$,
654: SN\,2006gy is probably the brightest SN ever observed.
655: The
656: slow brightening, the peak luminosity and the
657: H$\alpha$ emission line and the possible
658: SN-Ia-like features suggest
659: that SN\,2006gy maybe related
660: to the hybrid IIn/Ia SNe class
661: (also known as type-IIa; Deng et al. 2004).
662: %---------------------------------
663: %--- Comparison with other SNs ---
664: %---------------------------------
665: The other possible members in the type-IIa group are
666: SN\,2002ic (Hamuy et al. 2003)
667: %; Wood-Vasey et al. 2004; Kotak et al. 2004);
668: % SN\,1988Z (Stathakis \& Sadler 1991)
669: SN\,2005gj (Aldering et al. 2006);
670: SN\,1997cy (Germany et al. 2000)
671: %; Turatto et al. 2000);
672: and SN\,1999E (Rigon et al. 2003).
673: %In Table~\ref{Tab-SNcomp} we compare the basic properties
674: %of SN\,2006gy with those of the other suggested type-IIa SNe.
675: %
676: %\begin{deluxetable}{lccl}
677: %\tablecolumns{4}
678: %%\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
679: %%\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
680: %\tablewidth{0pt}
681: %\tablecaption{SN~IIa comparison}
682: %\tablehead{
683: %\colhead{SN name} &
684: %\colhead{$M_{V,peak}$} &
685: %\colhead{rise time} &
686: %\colhead{Environment} \\
687: %}
688: %\startdata
689: %2006gy & $-22.0$ & $\sim55$ & early type \\
690: %2005gj & $-20.4$ & $\sim30$ & $M_{B}=-17.4$ Irr. \\
691: %2002ic & $-20.1$ & $20$ & H$\alpha$ emission \\
692: %1999E & $<-19.5$ & $<140$ & $M_{B}=-15$ in spiral arm \\
693: %1997cy & $-20.1$ & $<30$ & $M_{V}=-17.7$ blue LSB galaxy\\
694: %1988Z & $-17.5$ & ? & LSB spiral \\
695: %\enddata
696: %\tablecomments{References:
697: %SN~2002ic (Hamuy et al. 2003; Wood-Vasey 2004; Aldering et al. 2006; Kotak et al. 2004);
698: %SN~1999E (Rigon et al. 2003);
699: %SN~2005gj (Aldering et al. 2006);
700: %SN~1997cy (Germany et al. 2000);
701: %SN~1988Z (Stathakis \& Sadler 1991).}
702: %\label{Tab-SNcomp}
703: %\end{deluxetable}
704: %
705:
706:
707: Any model of SN\,2006gy has to explain
708: the spectral lines,
709: the extra-ordinary peak luminosity of
710: $L_{p}\sim3\times10^{44}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$ (after correction for
711: extinction), and a radiated energy over the first two months
712: of $E_{rad}\sim1.1\times10^{51}\,$erg
713: (assuming 11,000-K black body which roughly matches the
714: Rayleigh-Jeans slope in DBSP spectra).
715: %
716: We note that even if the extinction in NGC\,1260 was overestimated
717: and the SN light suffers only from Galactic extinction, the total
718: radiated energy within the first two months is about $3\times10^{50}\,$erg.
719:
720:
721: The high peak luminosity suggests that the blast wave
722: from the explosion
723: efficiently converts the mechanical energy to radiation.
724: This mean the shock has to be radiative
725: which requires the circum-stellar medium (CSM) density to
726: exceed $10^6\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$.
727: %
728: Moreover, the conversion of mechanical energy
729: of an explosion to radiation requires
730: that the ejecta
731: sweep up matter with comparable mass.
732: %
733: The slow rise time, $t_{p}\sim50\,$d
734: to peak luminosity implies that the
735: dense region has a size of at least $R\sim v_st_p\sim 2\times 10^{15}\,{\rm
736: cm}$, where $v_s\sim 5\times 10^8\,{\rm cm\,s}^{-1}$ is the speed of the
737: blast wave.
738: %
739: The peak luminosity, $L_{p}$, requires density
740: of the order,
741: $n\sim L_{p}/(2\pi R^{2} v_{s}^3)\sim 10^{10}\,$cm$^{-3}$.
742: % 5.7x10^{10} round to 10^{10}
743: Assuming an upper limit on $v_{s}$ of $10^{9}\,$cm\,s$^{-1}$
744: at early times,
745: the minimum mass contained within this radius is $\gtorder0.2\,$M$_\odot$.
746: The gradual decrease in the radiated
747: energy, and possibly lower expansion velocities
748: would easily
749: bring it closer to a solar mass.
750: %
751: The mass loss
752: rate by the progenitor has to be stupendous, $\dot M \sim
753: 1\,M_\odot/(t_{p} v_{s}/v_{w})\sim 10^{-1}\,M_\odot\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$,
754: over a time scale of at least about $10\,$yr,
755: where $v_{w}=200\,$km\,s$^{-1}$
756: is the speed of the progenitor wind
757: (Smith et al. 2006; $v_{w}\sim 130$--$260\,$km\,s$^{-1}$).
758: Finally, the high CSM density accounts for the lack of
759: substantial X-ray and radio emission (being absorbed by photoelectric
760: and free-free absorption, respectively).
761:
762:
763:
764: %----------------------
765: %--- Interpretation ---
766: %----------------------
767: SN2006gy shares some properties with type-IIa and type
768: IIn SNe. Type-IIn SNe are most plausibly the result
769: of a core collapse SN embedded in dense CSM, while
770: IIa events have been explained as thermo-nuclear explosions
771: taking place in a dense medium
772: (e.g., Livio \& Riess 2003; Han \& Podsiadlowski 2006).
773: %
774: %Several models were suggested to explain type-IIa SNe.
775: %(e.g., Hamuy et al. 2003; Livio \& Riess 2003; Tsujimoto \& Shigeyama 2006; Han\ \& Podsiadlowski 2006; Wood-Vasey \& Sokoloski 2006).
776: %%
777: %% also Type 1.5 Iben & Renzini (1983)
778: %%
779: %
780: The thermo-nuclear model is attractive from a spectroscopic
781: perspective.
782: %
783: In the context of type-Ia SNe,
784: a possible explanation to the high-mass loss rate
785: is that it is the
786: result of a common-envelope phase in a binary system (e.g., Taam
787: \& Ricker 2006 and references therein). This scenario was suggested
788: by Livio \& Riess (2003) to explain the properties of SN\,2002ic,
789: and is consistent with the inferred high mass loss rate
790: and its velocity (i.e., $\sim200\,$km\,s$^{-1}$).
791: %
792: However,
793: this scenario
794: requires the ejection of matter from the
795: progenitor to shortly precede the SN explosion
796: (Chugai \& Yungelson 2004).
797: %
798: Moreover, the
799: total kinetic energy of Ia events is limited to
800: about $1$--$2\times10^{51}\,$erg (Khokhlov et al. 1993),
801: and it can get up to $2.5\times10^{51}\,$erg for
802: super-Chandrasekhar models (cf. Yoon \& Langer 2004).
803: Therefore,
804: unless we considerably over-estimated the extinction,
805: the total radiated energy of SN\,2006gy
806: in the first two months alone is challenging for type-Ia-like
807: SN models.
808: %
809:
810:
811: Smith et al. (2006),
812: noting that the envelope of a massive star
813: ($>100\,$M$_{\odot}$)
814: contains a reservoir
815: of thermal energy that can power the SN,
816: suggested that such a star was the progenitor of SN\,2006gy.
817: %
818: However, most of the thermal energy
819: will be lost due to expansion and
820: the ability of the photons to leak out is
821: limited by the long diffusion timescale for photons
822: ($\gtorder$months; e.g., Kulkarni 2005).
823: Therefore, it will be difficult for this specific model
824: (alone) to explain the high
825: peak luminosity of SN\,2006gy.
826:
827:
828:
829: Along the general lines of previous suggestion
830: by Benetti et al. (2006; for SN\,2002ic)
831: and Smith et al. (2006; for SN\,2006gy),
832: %
833: we speculate that
834: the large energy budget for SN\,2006gy
835: may hint at a highly energetic explosion ($\sim10^{52}\,$erg),
836: from a massive stellar progenitor.
837: %
838: Two possibilities are an CSM-embedded collapsar
839: (e.g., Woosley \& MacFadyen 1999),
840: or a pair production SN
841: (e.g., Ober et al. 1983; Smith et al. 2006).
842: Pair production SNe, however, require low-metallicity progenitors,
843: but it may be possible to overcome this requirement
844: by the merger of two massive stars.
845: We further speculate that such a merger may be responsible
846: to the high mass-loss rate (e.g., common envelope ejection).
847: %
848: SN\,2006gy and other IIa (and maybe many IIn)
849: events may result from one of these energetic explosions
850: that are able to produce $\sim10^{52}\,$erg.
851:
852: The general issues of the large energy release into a dense CSM
853: have been discussed for some type IIn events
854: (e.g., Chugai et al. 2004, Gal-Yam et al. 2006).
855: %
856: For reasons
857: we do not understand the explosion is preceded by a phase of
858: stupendous mass loss.
859: The mass and geometry of the hydrogen envelope may determines
860: the outcome of the explosion (e.g., IIa or IIn).
861: Finally, the rarity of such energetic SNe
862: reflect the rarity of the progenitors.
863:
864:
865:
866:
867:
868:
869: \acknowledgments
870: We are grateful to N. Gehrels for approving the {\it Swift} observations.
871: We thank Re'em Sari, Sterl Phinney, Orly Gnat, Ehud Nakar and Lauren MacArthur
872: for valuable discussions, and we are grateful to J. Hickey for
873: his help obtaining the AO observations, and to D. Sand and R. Ellis
874: for spectroscopic observations.
875: This work is supported in part by grants from NSF and NASA.
876: This research was partially based on data from the ING Archive.
877:
878:
879: \begin{thebibliography}{}
880:
881:
882:
883: %\bibitem[Alard \& Lupton(1998)]{1998ApJ...503..325A} Alard, C., \& Lupton,
884: %R.~H.\ 1998, ApJ, 503, 325
885:
886: \bibitem[Aldering et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...650..510A} Aldering, G., et al.\
887: 2006, ApJ, 650, 510
888:
889: \bibitem[Benetti et al.(2006)]{2006astro.ph.11125B} Benetti, S.,
890: Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., Taubenberger, S., Harutyunyan, A., \& Valenti,
891: S.\ 2006, astro-ph/0611125
892:
893: %\bibitem[Brown et al.(2002)]{2002IAUC.7785....1B} Brown, N.~J., Waagen,
894: %E.~O., Scovil, C., Nelson, P., Oksanen, A., Solonen, J., \& Price, A.\
895: %2002, IAUC, 7785, 1
896:
897: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{1989ApJ...345..245C} Cardelli, J.~A.,
898: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
899:
900: \bibitem[Cenko et al.(2006)]{2006PASP..118.1396C} Cenko, S.~B., et al.\
901: 2006, PASP, 118, 1396
902:
903: \bibitem[Chugai \& Yungelson(2004)]{2004AstL...30...65C} Chugai, N.~N., \&
904: Yungelson, L.~R.\ 2004, Astronomy Letters, 30, 65
905:
906: \bibitem[Chugai et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.355..627C} Chugai, N.~N.,
907: Chevalier, R.~A., \& Lundqvist, P.\ 2004, MNRAS, 355, 627
908:
909: %\bibitem[Chugai \& Chevalier(2006)]{2006astro.ph.11302C} Chugai, N.~N., \&
910: %Chevalier, R.~A.\ 2006, astro-ph/0611302
911:
912: %\bibitem[Davies et al.(1987)]{1987ApJS...64..581D} Davies, R.~L., Burstein,
913: %D., Dressler, A., Faber, S.~M., Lynden-Bell, D., Terlevich, R.~J., \&
914: %Wegner, G.\ 1987, ApJS, 64, 581
915:
916: \bibitem[Deng et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...605L..37D} Deng, J., et al.\ 2004,
917: ApJL, 605, L37
918:
919: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{1990ARA&A..28..215D} Dickey, J.~M., \&
920: Lockman, F.~J.\ 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
921:
922: \bibitem[Filippenko et al.(1992)]{1992ApJ...384L..15F} Filippenko, A.~V.,
923: et al.\ 1992, ApJL, 384, L15
924:
925: \bibitem[Foley et al.(2006)]{2006CBET..695....1F} Foley, R.~J., Li, W.,
926: Moore, M., Wong, D.~S., Pooley, D., \& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 2006, Central
927: Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 695, 1 (2006).~ Edited by Green, D.~W.~E.,
928: 695, 1
929:
930: \bibitem[Gal-Yam et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...609L..59G} Gal-Yam, A., et al.\
931: 2004, ApJL, 609, L59
932:
933: \bibitem[Gal-Yam et al.(2006)]{2006astro.ph..8029G} Gal-Yam, A., et al.\
934: 2006, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0608029
935:
936: \bibitem[Germany et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...533..320G} Germany, L.~M., Reiss,
937: D.~J., Sadler, E.~M., Schmidt, B.~P., \& Stubbs, C.~W.\ 2000, ApJ, 533,
938: 320
939:
940: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.424..651H} Hamuy, M., et al.\ 2003,
941: Nature, 424, 651
942:
943: \bibitem[Han \& Podsiadlowski(2006)]{2006MNRAS.368.1095H} Han, Z., \&
944: Podsiadlowski, P.\ 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1095
945:
946: \bibitem[Harutyunyan et al.(2006)]{2006CBET..647....1H} Harutyunyan, A.,
947: Benetti, S., Turatto, M., Cappellaro, E., Elias-Rosa, N., \& Andreuzzi, G.\
948: 2006, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 647, 1 (2006).~ Edited by Green,
949: D.~W.~E., 647, 1
950:
951: \bibitem[Hayward et al.(2001)]{2001PASP..113..105H} Hayward, T.~L., Brandl,
952: B., Pirger, B., Blacken, C., Gull, G.~E., Schoenwald, J., \& Houck, J.~R.\
953: 2001, PASP, 113, 105
954:
955: \bibitem[H{\o}g et al.(2000)]{2000A&A...355L..27H} H{\o}g, E., et al.\
956: 2000, A\&A, 355, L27
957:
958: %\bibitem[Howell et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.443..308H} Howell, D.~A., et al.\
959: %2006, Nature, 443, 308
960:
961: %\bibitem[Iben(1999)]{1999IAUS..191..591I} Iben, I., Jr.\ 1999, IAU
962: %Symp.~191: Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, 191, 591
963:
964: %\bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{1998ApJ...498..541K} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998,
965: %ApJ, 498, 541
966:
967: \bibitem[Khokhlov et al.(1993)]{1993A&A...270..223K} Khokhlov, A., Mueller,
968: E., \& Hoeflich, P.\ 1993, A\&A, 270, 223
969:
970: \bibitem[Kinney et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...467...38K} Kinney, A.~L., Calzetti,
971: D., Bohlin, R.~C., McQuade, K., Storchi-Bergmann, T., \& Schmitt, H.~R.\
972: 1996, ApJ, 467, 38
973:
974: %\bibitem[Kotak et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.354L..13K} Kotak, R., Meikle,
975: %W.~P.~S., Adamson, A., \& Leggett, S.~K.\ 2004, MNRAS, 354, L13
976:
977: \bibitem[Kulkarni(2005)]{2005astro.ph.10256K} Kulkarni, S.~R.\ 2005, astro-ph/0510256
978:
979: %\bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(2007)]{2007Nature} Kulkarni, S.~R., Ofek, E.~O. et al.\ 2007, submitted to Nature
980:
981: \bibitem[Livio \& Riess(2003)]{2003ApJ...594L..93L} Livio, M., \& Riess,
982: A.~G.\ 2003, ApJL, 594, L93
983:
984: \bibitem[Munari \& Zwitter(1997)]{1997A&A...318..269M} Munari, U., \&
985: Zwitter, T.\ 1997, A\&A, 318, 269
986:
987: %\bibitem[Nomoto et al.(1986)]{1986Ap&SS.118..305N} Nomoto, K., Thielemann,
988: %F.-K., Yokoi, K., \& Branch, D.\ 1986, Ap\&SS, 118, 305
989:
990:
991: \bibitem[Ober et al.(1983)]{1983A&A...119...61O} Ober, W.~W., El Eid,
992: M.~F., \& Fricke, K.~J.\ 1983, A\&A, 119, 61
993:
994: \bibitem[Oke et al.(1995)]{1995PASP..107..375O} Oke, J.~B., et al.\ 1995,
995: PASP, 107, 375
996:
997: \bibitem[Peng et al.(2002)]{2002AJ....124..266P} Peng, C.~Y., Ho, L.~C.,
998: Impey, C.~D., \& Rix, H.-W.\ 2002, AJ, 124, 266
999:
1000: \bibitem[Pickles(1998)]{1998PASP..110..863P} Pickles, A.~J.\ 1998, PASP,
1001: 110, 863
1002:
1003: \bibitem[Prieto et al.(2006)]{2006CBET..648....1P} Prieto, J.~L.,
1004: Garnavich, P., Chronister, A., \& Connick, P.\ 2006, Central Bureau lectronic Telegrams, 648, 1 (2006).~ Edited by Green, D.~W.~E., 648, 1
1005:
1006: \bibitem[Quimby(2006)]{2006IAUC..8754....1Q} Quimby, R.\ 2006, Central
1007: Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 644, 1 (2006).~ Edited by Green, D.~W.~E.,
1008: 644, 1
1009:
1010: \bibitem[Rigon et al.(2003)]{2003MNRAS.340..191R} Rigon, L., et al.\ 2003,
1011: MNRAS, 340, 191
1012:
1013: %\bibitem[Schiminovich et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...619L..47S} Schiminovich, D.,
1014: %et al.\ 2005, ApJL, 619, L47
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...500..525S} Schlegel, D.~J.,
1017: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Shelton(1997)]{1997SPIE.3126...455T} Shelton, J.~C. 1997,
1020: SPIE, 3126, 455
1021:
1022: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{2006AJ....131.1163S} Skrutskie, M.~F., et
1023: al.\ 2006, AJ, 131, 1163
1024:
1025: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{2006astro.ph.12617S} Smith, N., et al.\ 2006, astro-ph/0612617
1026:
1027: %\bibitem[Stathakis \& Sadler(1991)]{1991MNRAS.250..786S} Stathakis, R.~A.,
1028: %\& Sadler, E.~M.\ 1991, MNRAS, 250, 786
1029:
1030: \bibitem[Taam \& Ricker(2006)]{2006astro.ph.11043T} Taam, R.~E., \& Ricker,
1031: P.~M.\ 2006, astro-ph/0611043
1032:
1033: \bibitem[Troy et al.(2000)]{2000SPIE.4007...31T} Troy, M., et al.\ 2000,
1034: SPIE, 4007, 31
1035:
1036: \bibitem[Tsujimoto \& Shigeyama(2006)]{2006ApJ...638L.109T} Tsujimoto, T.,
1037: \& Shigeyama, T.\ 2006, ApJL, 638, L109
1038:
1039: %\bibitem[Turatto et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...534L..57T} Turatto, M., et al.\
1040: %2000, ApJL, 534, L57
1041:
1042: \bibitem[Turatto et al.(2003)]{2003fthp.conf..200T} Turatto, M., Benetti,
1043: S., \& Cappellaro, E.\ 2003, From Twilight to Highlight: The Physics of
1044: Supernovae, 200
1045:
1046: \bibitem[Vazdekis(1999)]{1999ApJ...513..224V} Vazdekis, A.\ 1999, ApJ,
1047: 513, 224
1048:
1049: \bibitem[Wegner et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....126.2268W} Wegner, G., et al.\
1050: 2003, AJ, 126, 2268
1051:
1052: %\bibitem[Wood-Vasey et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616..339W} Wood-Vasey, W.~M.,
1053: %Wang, L., \& Aldering, G.\ 2004, ApJ, 616, 339
1054:
1055: \bibitem[Wood-Vasey \& Sokoloski(2006)]{2006ApJ...645L..53W} Wood-Vasey,
1056: W.~M., \& Sokoloski, J.~L.\ 2006, ApJL, 645, L53
1057:
1058: \bibitem[Woosley \& MacFadyen(1999)]{1999A&AS..138..499W} Woosley, S.~E.,
1059: \& MacFadyen, A.~I.\ 1999, A\&AS, 138, 499
1060:
1061: \bibitem[Yoon \& Langer(2004)]{2004A&A...419..623Y} Yoon, S.-C., \& Langer,
1062: N.\ 2004, A\&A, 419, 623
1063:
1064: \end{thebibliography}
1065:
1066:
1067: \end{document}
1068:
1069: