1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\slugcomment{Accepted and scheduled for publication
4: %in {\it the Astrophysical Journal}, for the ApJ 20 June 2005, v 626
5: %2 issue}
6:
7: \documentclass{emulateapj}
8:
9: \def\lax {\ifmmode{_<\atop^{\sim}}\else{${_<\atop^{\sim}}$}\fi}
10: \def\gax {\ifmmode{_>\atop^{\sim}}\else{${_>\atop^{\sim}}$}\fi}
11: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
12: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
13: \def\etal{ et al. }
14: \def\pl{{\sc pl}}
15: \def\comptt{{\sc comptt}}
16: \def\compps{{\sc compps}}
17: \def\taut{\tau_{\rm T}}
18: \def\kte{kT_{\rm e}}
19: \def\chiq{$\chi^2$}
20: \def\ktin{kT_{\rm in}}
21: \def\bb{{\sc bb}}
22: \def\ktbb{kT_{\rm bb}}
23: \def\rbb{R_{\rm bb}}
24: \def\gs{{\sc Gaussian}}
25: \def\nh{{$N_{\rm H}$}}
26: \def\dbb{{\sc diskbb}}
27: \def\bb{{\sc bb}}
28: \def\I{{\em INTEGRAL}}
29: %\def\R{{\em RXTE}}
30: \def\S{{\em Swift}}
31: \def\IGR{IGR~J00291+5934}
32: \def\0840{IGR~J08408--4503}
33: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
34: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
35:
36: %\usepackage{lscape}
37:
38: \begin{document}
39:
40: \title{IGR J08408--4503: a new recurrent Supergiant Fast X-ray Transient}
41:
42:
43: \author{D. G\"{o}tz\altaffilmark{1}}\email{diego.gotz@cea.fr}
44: \author{M. Falanga\altaffilmark{1,2}}%\email{maurizio.falanga@cea.fr}
45: \author{F. Senziani\altaffilmark{3,4,5}}%\email{senziani@iasf-milano.inaf.it}
46: \author{A. De Luca\altaffilmark{3}}%\email{deluca@iasf-milano.inaf.it}
47: \author{S. Schanne\altaffilmark{1}}%\email{schanne@cea.fr}
48: \author{A. von Kienlin\altaffilmark{6}}%\email{azk@mpe.mpg.de}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{1}{CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique,
51: F-91191, Gif sur Yvette, France}
52: \altaffiltext{2}{Unit\'e mixte de recherche Astroparticule et
53: Cosmologie, 11 place Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France}
54: \altaffiltext{3}{INAF--IASF Milano, via Bassini 15, I-20133 Milano, Italy}
55: \altaffiltext{4}{Universit\'e Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France}
56: \altaffiltext{5}{Universit\`a di Pavia, Dipartimento di Fisica
57: Nucleare e Teorica and INFN--Pavia, via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy}
58: \altaffiltext{6}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse,
59: D-85748 Garching, Germany}
60:
61:
62: \begin{abstract}
63: The supergiant fast X-ray transient \0840 was discovered by \I\ on May
64: 15, 2006, during a bright flare.
65: The source shows sporadic recurrent short bright flares, reaching a peak luminosity of
66: 10$^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$ within less than one hour.
67: The companion star is HD 74194, an Ob5Ib(f) supergiant star
68: located at 3 kpc in the Vela region. We report
69: the light curves and broad-band spectra (0.1--200 keV) of all the three flares of \0840\ detected up to now based on \I\ and \S\ data.
70: The flare spectra are well described by a power-law model with a high energy cut-off at $\sim$ 15 keV. The absorption column density during the flares was found to be $\sim 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$,
71: indicating a very low matter density around the compact object.
72: Using the supergiant donor star parameters, the wind accretion conditions imply an orbital period of the order of one year, a spin period of the order of hours and a magnetic field of the order of 10$^{13}$ G.
73: \end{abstract}
74:
75: \keywords{X-rays: binaries -- X-rays: bursts -- X-rays: individual: IGR~J08408--4503}
76:
77: \section{Introduction}
78: \label{sec:intro}
79:
80: Supergiant Fast X-ray Transients (SFXTs), consisting of a
81: wind accreting compact object and an OB supergiant donor star, spend
82: most of the time in a quiescent state, with X-ray
83: luminosities of the order of $10^{32}-10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Sporadically
84: they go into outburst reaching luminosities of $10^{36}-10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$
85: \citep{sguera,zand,negueruela,smith}. The outbursts or
86: strong flaring activities are characterized by very short time
87: scales, i.e. from minutes to hours.
88: SFXTs have been discovered only recently as a new class of X-ray sources, and may unresolved
89: fundamental questions remain open. The lack of confirmed orbital or
90: pulse periods complicates the determination of the system parameters as well as of
91: the compact object nature. Up to now IGR~J11215-5952 alone shows regularly recurrent
92: outbursts every $\sim 330$ days, most likely linked to its orbital
93: period \citep{sidoli}. To account for the accretion process that causes the
94: short outbursts, it was proposed that the clumpy wind in
95: early-type stars could be captured by the compact
96: object producing the X-ray flares on the observed time scale
97: \citep{zand}. However, this scenario has yet to be well understood and confirmed for OB
98: stars in binary systems.
99:
100:
101: The number of known SFXTs has grown recently thanks to the International Gamma-Ray
102: Astrophysics Laboratory (\I), see e.g. IGR~J16465-4507,
103: IGR~J17544-2619, or IGR~J11215-5952
104: \citep[e.g.][]{walter06,sguera06,sidoli}. The new SFXT presented here, \0840, was
105: discovered in the Vela region on May 15, 2006 with \I\ during a bright outburst
106: lasting about 15 minutes \citep{disc}. The candidate optical
107: counterpart was first tentatively identified as the supergiant,
108: Ob5Ib(f), HD 74194 star \citep{disc,masetti06} located at 3 kpc in the
109: Vela region \citep[e.g.][]{walborn,humphreys,schroeder}. Successively, using the
110: \S\ X-ray Telescope (XRT) a refined source position ($\alpha_{J2000} =
111: 08^{\rm h}49^{\rm m}47^{\rm s}\!.97$ and
112: $\delta_{J2000} = -45^{\circ}03^{\prime}29^{\prime\prime}\!\!.8$ with an uncertainty of $5^{\prime\prime}\!\!.4$) was derived, strengthening the association with HD 74194 \citep{swiftatel}.
113:
114:
115: Optical spectra of HD 74194 measured a few days after the outburst \citep{barba} strongly resemble the ones of the companion star of another SFXT, IGR J17544--2619 \citep{pellizza}.
116: In addition the radial velocity variations in the HeI and HeII absorption lines with an amplitude of
117: about 35 km s$^{-1}$ were measured, suggesting either a pulsating variable nature of the
118: supergiant star HD 74194 or a possible Doppler orbital modulation \citep[e.g.][]{conti}.
119:
120: \0840 shows the typical SFXTs recurrent short flaring
121: events. Using \I\ archival data, an outburst was detected on July 1,
122: 2003 \citep{mereghetti}, while
123: the last bright flare was observed on October 4, 2006 with the \S~
124: satellite \citep{swiftgcn}.
125:
126:
127: In this letter we present the light curve and broad-band spectral study
128: of all the three outbursts of \0840\ observed up to now. In addition, thanks to the knowledge of the
129: companion star parameters, the possible wind accretion conditions are discussed.
130:
131:
132: \section{Data Analysis and Results}
133:
134:
135: \0840 was observed twice in outburst with \I\ \citep{integ}, on July
136: 1, 2003 and May 15, 2006, i.e. during the satellite
137: orbits 83 and 438. This dataset includes publicly available
138: data and part of AO3 Vela region guest observations. Hereafter we call the
139: two datasets flare 1 and flare 2, respectively. We used the data from the
140: coded mask imaging telescope IBIS/ISGRI \citep{ibis,isgri} at energies
141: between 15 keV and 200 keV and from the JEM-X monitor \citep{jemx} between 3 and 20 keV.
142: For JEM-X the data were extracted only for flare 2, flare 1 being
143: outside the JEM-X field of view. The data reduction was performed
144: using the standard Offline Science Analysis (OSA) version 5.1.
145:
146: Single pointings ($\sim 2000$ s each) were deconvolved and analyzed
147: separately.
148: The IBIS/ISGRI 15--40 keV high energy light curve, shown in Fig. \ref{fig:b1lc},
149: has been extracted from the images using all available pointings. Light curves with a 100 s time
150: bin were also extracted around the outburst peaks.
151:
152:
153:
154: The third outburst, flare 3, was observed on October 4, 2006
155: (14:45:42 UT) with \S/BAT \citep{swift,bat}. Since the flare was detected with an image trigger (15--150 keV),
156: only ``Survey'' data products are available from the BAT instrument, with
157: a typical integration time of $\sim300$ s. We note that the BAT data
158: coverage is not continuous due to the low Earth orbit of the
159: \S\ satellite.
160: For each $\sim300$ s time bin the target count rate in the 14--40
161: keV energy range was evaluated with the mask-weighting technique using the XRT
162: coordinates. The BAT data were
163: selected 15 h before and 30 h after the trigger, and
164: reduced using the standard software version 2.5.
165:
166:
167:
168: \S~ slewed automatically to the direction of the source and XRT \citep{xrt} (0.1--10 keV) follow-up observations were performed.
169: The XRT data were reduced using {\sc ftools} version 6.1.1., and processed with {\sc xrtpipeline} version 0.10.4, using
170: standard filtering selections.
171: The XRT 0.1--10 keV energy band light curves have been extracted by
172: selecting a circular region of 20 pixels around the source for the
173: Photon Counting (PC) mode, and rectangular region of 40$\times$20
174: pixels for the Window Timing (WT) mode. Background light curves were
175: extracted in source free regions in order to produce the final
176: background-subtracted XRT/PC/WT light curves. The count rate of the source in
177: both modes is low enough in order to avoid the pile-up in the CCD.
178:
179:
180: \subsection{Flare light curves}
181:
182: In Fig. \ref{fig:b1lc} we show
183: the three outburst light curves of \0840 observed up to now.
184: The light curves are dominated by a first bright flare that typically
185: reaches a peak luminosity of $3-6\times10^{36}$ erg
186: s$^{-1}$ (see Sec. \ref{sec:spec}) in a time scale of several tens of minutes to hours. The observed flares
187: vary from an isolated strong flare (flare 2) to a more
188: structured flaring activity (flare 1 and 3). Moreover flare 3 shows also
189: weaker flares with a luminosity of the order of $5\times10^{35}$
190: erg s$^{-1}$.
191: The three outburst durations are of the
192: order of several hours. The flare characteristics are similar to
193: those observed in other SFXTs, such as XTE~J1739-302
194: \citep[e.g.][]{sguera}, IGR~J16465-4507 \citep[e.g.][]{lutovinov05},
195: IGR~J17544-2691 \citep[e.g.][]{zand}, and IGR~J11215-5952
196: \citep[e.g.][]{sidoli}, but resemble also those well
197: studied in persistent wind accretion high mass X-ray binary (HMXB) sources like Vela~X-1
198: \citep[e.g.][]{white}, 4U~1700-377 \citep[e.g.][]{rubin96}.
199:
200: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
201: \centering
202: %\includegraphics[width=6.cm,angle=-90]{b1tot.ps}
203: \includegraphics[height=18cm,width=7.5cm,angle=-90]{f1.ps}
204: \caption{{\em Bottom, from left:} IBIS/ISGRI (flare 1,2) and \S\ (flare 3) light curves. IBIS data are binned at $\sim 2$ ks. In the last panel the crosses represent the extrapolated BAT flux, while
205: the diamonds and triangles the XRT/WT and PC data. The time axis is expressed in hours after T$_{0}$=52821.0, T$_{1}$=53870.0, and T$_{3}$=54012.615 MJD, respectively. The \S\ light curve shows also weak flares
206: e.g. at t$\sim$3.5 h \0840 is detected in BAT at $\sim$7 $\sigma$ level.
207: {\em Top:} the brightest part of each outburst is shown on a smaller time scale (100 s time bin for ISGRI).}
208: \label{fig:b1lc}
209: \end{figure*}
210:
211:
212: Up to now only IGR~J11215-5952 has shown
213: a $\sim 330$ days periodic outburst. Therefore,
214: using a linear orbital function $T(n) = T_{0}+ nP_{\rm orb}$ we
215: attempted to test the hypothesis of a periodically recurrent
216: outburst also for \0840. $P_{\rm orb}$ is the orbital period in days and
217: $T_{0}$ is taken from flare 2 (MJD 53780.771215). A possible
218: orbital period is 4.2988 days (with $n_{1}=244$ and
219: $n_{2}=33$), however,
220: searching in the \I\ archival data around the expected outburst time, we did
221: not find any significant flux excess at the \0840 source position. We
222: conclude that the three observed outbursts are sporadic episodes of
223: accretion of matter fed from the wind of the supergiant companion star.
224:
225: In order to directly compare the light curves measured with
226: different instruments (see Fig. \ref{fig:b1lc}), all the count rates have been converted to the
227: 0.1--10 keV fluxes assuming the spectral shape derived in Sec. \ref{sec:spec}.
228:
229:
230:
231: \subsection{Flare spectra}
232: \label{sec:spec}
233:
234: We performed the spectral analysis using XSPEC version 11.3, for the ISGRI data (20--200 keV), flare 1,
235: for the 3.5--20 keV JEM-X data with the simultaneous 20--200 keV
236: ISGRI data, flare 2, and for the 0.3--100 keV simultaneous XRT/BAT
237: data, flare 3. Only the brightest parts of the flares have been considered.
238: For the simultaneous data a constant factor was
239: included in the fit to take into account the uncertainty in the
240: cross-calibration of the instruments.
241: All data were rebinned in order to have
242: $3\sigma$ points and the spectral uncertainties in the results are given
243: at a 90\% confidence level for a single parameter. We use the source
244: distance of 3 kpc throughout the paper.
245:
246: The XRT/BAT (flare 3) broad-band (0.3--100 keV) dataset provides
247: us the widest energy coverage and the best statistics, so we fitted it first.
248: We fitted the data using a simple photoelectrically-absorbed
249: power-law ({\sc pl}) model which was found inadequate with a
250: {\chiq}/d.o.f. = 132.76/76.
251: The addition of a high-energy exponential cut-off significantly
252: improved the fit to {\chiq}/d.o.f.=80.36/75, resulting in a best-fit photon
253: index of 0.1$\pm$0.2 and a cut-off energy at 15$\pm$5 keV.
254: The hydrogen column density, $N_{\rm H}$, was found to be $1.0\pm0.3\times10^{21}$
255: cm$^{-2}$. This value is compatible with
256: Galactic value in the direction of the source, $N_{\rm H}=3\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, reported in
257: the radio maps of \citet{nh}.
258: We attempted to fit the low energy spectrum also with a thermal black-body
259: model, {\sc bb}, plus a {\pl} for the high energies, but we found high {\sc bb} temperature,
260: $kT_{\rm BB}\sim 8$ keV, which is much larger than the measured values for a neutron star (NS) surface or polar cap thermal emission.
261: Also a fit with a thermal bremsstrahlung model can
262: be statistically ruled out by our data ({\chiq}/d.o.f.=183.2/76).
263: The energy spectra during the flaring activity are hence best fitted with a high-energy
264: exponential cut-off {\sc pl} model similar to the spectra observed from persistent wind accreting HMXB hosting a NS, e.g. Vela~X-1 \citep{white}.
265:
266: The joint JEM-X/ISGRI (3.5--200 keV), flare 2,
267: spectrum was also fitted with the cut-off {\sc pl} model used
268: for the flare 3. The best fit values are similar to the ones of flare 3, see Table \ref{tab:spectra}.
269: Given that we were not able to constrain the {\nh} value (as the JEM-X
270: bandpass starts above 3 keV) we fixed it to the value found from flare 3.
271:
272:
273: For flare 1 only ISGRI data (20--200 keV) are available.
274: The data can be well fitted with a simple {\sc pl} model with a photon index,
275: $\Gamma$, of 2.5$\pm$0.5. Note that fitting flare 2 (ISGRI) and 3 (BAT) spectra in the same energy range gives consistent photon index values, namely $\Gamma$=2.8$\pm$0.3 and $\Gamma$=2.3$\pm$0.4, respectively.
276: The apparently soft spectra derived using only the data above 20 keV show how important it is, to have a broad energy coverage in order to better characterize the spectrum of these sources.
277: %This value is consistent with flare 2 ($\Gamma$=2.8$\pm$0.3), and 3 ($\Gamma$=2.3$\pm$0.4) datasets fitted using the %ISGRI/BAT data alone in the same energy range.
278: To be coherent, we applied the same spectral model derived from the
279: broad-band fit of flare 2 and 3, also for flare 1, even if we had a smaller energy range.
280: We fixed the slope of the power law index to the values found (see Table
281: \ref{tab:spectra}) and found the cut-off energy compatible with
282: the one found for flares 2 and 3.
283:
284:
285: In Fig. \ref{fig:b1lc}, last panel, weak flares are visible after the main peak. To infer the flux at
286: very low mass accretion rate we extracted a XRT/PC
287: spectrum in the 0.1--6 keV energy band at $\sim$2.2 hr after the main flare, see Fig. \ref{fig:b1lc}. This is the last time interval where the source is clearly detected in the XRT images.
288: We call this weak flare, flare 4. Using the same model found
289: for flare 3, the source was at a bolometric luminosity of $5\times10^{35}$
290: erg s$^{-1}$, with a marginal indication of an
291: increase of the absorption column density.
292:
293:
294: The best fit parameters for the different flares are reported in Table
295: \ref{tab:spectra}.
296: In Fig. \ref{fig:burst3}, we show the broad-band unfolded
297: spectrum and the residuals of the data to the {\sc pl} with a high energy
298: cut-off model for flare 3.
299:
300: \begin{figure}[ht]
301: \centering
302: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm,angle=-90]{f2.ps}
303: \caption{Combined XRT (crosses) and BAT (diamonds) spectra of flare
304: 3. The best fit {\sc pl} high energy
305: cut-off model and the residuals (lower panel) are shown.}
306: \label{fig:burst3}
307: \end{figure}
308:
309: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
310: \tablecolumns{5}
311: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
312: \tablewidth{0pc}
313: \tablecaption{\0840 spectral parameters using a power-law model with an exponential
314: high energy cut-off\label{fits}}
315: %\begin{center}
316: %\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
317: %\hline
318: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\colhead{Flare 1} & \colhead{Flare 2} &\colhead{Flare 3} &\colhead{Flare 4}\\
319: \colhead{Dataset} & \colhead{ISGRI} & \colhead{JEM-X/ISGRI} &\colhead{XRT/BAT} &\colhead{XRT/BAT}}
320: \startdata
321: N$_{\rm H}$ \tablenotemark{a}& \nodata & 0.1 (f) & 0.1$\pm$0.03 & $<$0.75\\
322: $\Gamma$ & 0.0 (f) & 0.0$\pm$0.5 & 0.1$\pm$0.2 &0.1$\pm$0.4\\
323: $E_{\rm c}$ (keV) & 12.7$\pm$2.8 & 11.8$\pm$2.8 & 15$\pm$5 & 15 (f)\\
324: $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f & 14.06/12 & 57.09/90 & 80.36/75 & 11.72/10\\
325: Flux\tablenotemark{b}$_{\rm bol}$ & 7.0$\times$10$^{-10}$ &
326: 2.7$\times$10$^{-9}$ & 6.0$\times$10$^{-9}$ & 5.0$\times$10$^{-10}$\\
327: \enddata
328: \tablenotetext{a}{in units of 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$.}
329: \tablenotetext{b}{Unabsorbed 0.1--100 keV flux in units of erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.}
330: \label{tab:spectra}
331: \end{deluxetable}
332:
333:
334:
335: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
336: \label{sec:discussion}
337:
338: \0840\ is a recurrent SFXT with most likely sporadic episodes of
339: accretion of matter from the wind of the Ob5Ib(f), HD 74194, supergiant
340: companion star. The broad-band spectrum (0.3--200 keV)
341: allowed us to perform an improved spectral analysis for the new source
342: \0840\ using XRT/BAT and JEM-X/ISGRI data. The best fit to the
343: data required a {\sc pl} with a high energy cut-off, see Table
344: \ref{tab:spectra}. The spectrum is typical for HMXBs hosting a NS
345: \citep{white} where the emergent radiation is presumably produced by
346: accretion columns at the magnetic poles of the NS. The bolometric
347: flare peak luminosity is of the order
348: of $3-6\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which are typical values for wind accreting
349: HMXB. At low mass accretion rates, the source is observed at a bolometric
350: luminosity of $5\times10^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The source quiescent
351: luminosity is in the order of $\sim 2\times10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$
352: \citep{swiftatel}.
353:
354: During the outbursts the derived absorption of $\sim 1\times10^{21}$
355: cm$^{-2}$ is compatible with the total Galactic absorption in that direction as
356: estimated from the HI maps, indicating that the source is not
357: surrounded by large amounts of material. Some information about the
358: distribution of matter around an X-ray binary can be inferred from
359: observations of the variations with orbital phase of its spectrum
360: caused by absorption along the line of sight to the X-ray star. For
361: \0840, the orbital period is not known, therefore using a simply
362: spherically symmetric stellar wind model, we
363: approximate the wind density \citep[e.g. see Eq. (7) in][]{heap} at the NS surface ($a>>R_{*}$, $a$ is the
364: binary separation) for a circular orbit:
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: \lefteqn{N_{\rm H} \approx 1\times10^{21} \times} \\
367: &&\biggl(\frac{\dot M_{w}}{10^{-7} M_{\odot} {\rm yr}^{-1}}\biggl)\biggl(\frac{R_{*}}{14.5R_{\odot}}\biggl)^{-1}\biggl(\frac{\nu_{\infty}}{2000\, {\rm km\,\, s}^{-1}}\biggl)^{-1} {\rm cm}^{-2}, \nonumber
368: \label{nh}
369: \end{eqnarray}
370:
371: where $\dot M_{w}$ is the HD 74194 mass
372: loss rate and $\nu_{\infty}$ is the terminal wind velocity.
373: The used stellar parameters for HD 74194 are reported in Table
374: \ref{tab:star}. We found the estimated $N_{\rm H}$ compatible with the
375: derived absorption from the spectral fit. On the other hand, %Using the full $N_{\rm H}$ equation ,
376: locating the companion star at $a=2R_{*}$, and using a maximal wind acceleration parameter $\beta=1$,
377: $N_{\rm H}$ will change by a factor ln($R_{*})\approx27$, i.e. $N_{\rm
378: H}\approx2.7\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$. The observed $N_{\rm H}$ hints
379: towards a large binary separation and therefore a large orbital period.
380: The measured absorption is in variance with what has been observed for other SFXT \citep[see e.g.][]{walter06}.
381:
382: \begin{deluxetable}{cc}
383: \tablecolumns{2}
384: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
385: \tablewidth{0pc}
386: \tablecaption{Stellar parameters for HD 74194 derived from \citep{lamers}}
387: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} &\colhead{Value}}
388: \startdata
389: $T_{\rm eff}$ (k) & 33000\\
390: $R_{*}$ ($R_{\odot}$) & 14.5\\
391: $M_{*}$ ($M_{\odot}$) & 28\\
392: log($L_{*}/L_{\odot}$) & 5.3 \\
393: $\dot M_{w}$\tablenotemark{a} ($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$) & 2.3$\times10^{-7}$\\
394: $\nu_{\infty}$ (km s$^{-1}$)& 2000$\pm300$\\
395: $\nu_{\rm esc}$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 776\\
396: \enddata
397: \tablenotetext{a}{Calculated using Eq. \ref{mdot}.}
398: \label{tab:star}
399: \end{deluxetable}
400:
401:
402:
403: The companion mass loss rate, $\dot M_{w}$, was calculated for HD
404: 74194 using the average relation for the galactic O or B supergiants
405: stars \citep{lamersbook},
406: \be
407: {\rm log}(\dot M_{w}) = -1.37 + 2.07\,{\rm log}(L_{*}/10^{6})-{\rm
408: log}(\nu_{\infty}R_{*}^{0.5}).
409: \label{mdot}
410: \ee
411: The $\dot M_{w}$ value is a factor 10--100 lower that what found for
412: the persistent wind accretion HMXB, like Vela X-1 or 4U 1700-37. The
413: free parameter to obtain a higher $N_{\rm H}$ value for \0840\ is to have a higher mass loss
414: rates, $\dot M_{w}$. Using Eqs. (\ref{nh}) and (\ref{mdot}) we can see
415: that if the terminal wind velocity is a factor 5 lower (as observed
416: for an intrinsically obscured high energy source IGR J16318-4848
417: \citep{filliatre}), we would have a higher
418: absorption of $\sim10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, but such a low
419: wind velocity is not observed for HD 74194. This indicates that during the
420: accretion of matter for \0840\ there is no accretion wake of dense
421: matter surrounding the compact object \citep{blondin}.
422:
423:
424: We will assume that all the material within the capture radius
425: \begin{eqnarray}
426: R_{\rm acc} & = &\frac{2 G M_{\rm x}}{\nu_{\rm x}^{2}+\nu_{\infty}^{2}} \\
427: & \approx & 9.2\times10^{8}\biggl(\frac{\dot M_{acc}}{\dot
428: M_{w}}\biggl)^{1/2}\biggl(\frac{M_{*}+M_{x}}{28M_{\odot}}\biggl)^{1/3}
429: P_{\rm orb}^{1/3} \,\,{\rm cm}\nonumber
430: \label{orb}
431: \end{eqnarray}
432:
433: is accreted by the compact object \citep{bondi}. $M_{\rm x}$ is the
434: mass of the NS,
435: $\nu_{\rm x}$ its orbital velocity, and $\dot M_{acc}=
436: L_{x}c^{-2}\eta^{-1}$ the mass accretion rate, where $\eta\sim0.2$ is
437: the accretion efficiency for a NS. The rate of mass captured is
438: then given by $\dot M_{\rm acc}=\dot M_{w}R_{\rm acc}^{2}/(4a^{2})$,
439: with $R_{\rm acc} = 9.3\times10^{9}$ cm. We consider that $\nu_{\infty}
440: >> \nu_{\rm x}$ and $a>>R_{*}$. From the measured persistent emission L$_{x}\sim 2\times 10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$, we derive from Eq. (\ref{orb}) an orbital period of $\sim$1.5 years.
441:
442: The condition for accretion to take place is that the NS
443: magnetosphere radius is within the mass capture radius and the
444: corotation radius, i.e. $R_{Mag} \leq R_{\rm acc}$ and $R_{Mag} \leq
445: R_{\rm cor}$ \citep{illarinov}.
446: If we set $R_{\rm acc}
447: = R_{\rm cor}$ we have $P_{\rm spin} =
448: 2.36\times10^{27}(1.4M_{x})\nu_{\infty}^{-3} \simeq 7000$ s. The
449: magnetosphere radius is given by
450: \begin{equation}
451: R_{Mag}=0.1\mu^{1/3}\dot M_{w}^{1/6}\nu_{\infty}^{-1/6}M_{*}^{1/9}P_{\rm orb}^{2/9},
452: \end{equation}
453: where $\mu = B R_{\rm NS}^{3}$.
454: Setting the accretion condition $R_{Mag}=R_{\rm cor}=R_{\rm acc}$ the magnetic field has to be $B\sim 1.1\times 10^{13} (P_{\rm orb}/1 {\rm yr})^{-2/3}$ G, for $R_{\rm NS}=10^{6}$ cm. Assuming the orbital period derived above,
455: the NS magnetic field has to be of the order of 10$^{13}$ G. These are typical magnetic field values for young HMXBs hosting a NS, like e.g. Vela X-1 \citep{labarbera}.
456:
457: %Note if $R_{Mag}>R_{acc}$ we have a magnetic inhibition of accretion.
458:
459: The low $N_{\rm H}$ value measured during the flares is not consistent with the picture in which they are caused by clumps in the donor wind. In an alternative scenario, the flares could be associated with the sudden accretion onto the magnetic poles of matter previously stored in the magnetosphere during the quiescent phase.
460: However, in order to have such a mass storage, the above simplest accretion conditions have to be studied for different scenarios (e.g. $R_{\rm acc} > R_{\rm cor} > R_{\rm mag}$). One can derive these conditions by varying opportunely $P_{\rm orb}$, $P_{\rm spin}$, and $B$ \citep{bozzo}.
461: %But this search in parameters' space is beyond the scope of this paper.
462:
463:
464: We conclude that these recurrent sporadic very short outburst episodes, due to the
465: accretion of matter from the wind of a supergiant companion star, imply
466: a spin period of the order of hours with a long orbital period, and a 10$^{13}$ G magnetic field for the NS.
467: The determination of all the system parameters can help to solve the accretion
468: mechanism.
469:
470:
471: \begin{acknowledgements}
472: \small{DG and MF acknowledge the French Space Agency (CNES) for financial support.
473: MF is grateful to Luigi Stella and Enrico Bozzo for helpful
474: discussions during his visit in Rome. ADL acknowledges an ASI fellowship.
475: Based on observations with INTEGRAL, an ESA project with instruments and science data centre funded by ESA member states (especially the PI countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Spain), Czech Republic and Poland, and with the participation of Russia and the USA. We acknowledge the use of public data from the Swift data archive.}
476: \end{acknowledgements}
477:
478: \begin{thebibliography}{}
479:
480: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Barba et al.}{2006}]{barba}
481: Barba, R., Gamen, R., \& Morrell, N. 2006, Astr. Tel., 819
482:
483: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Barthelmy et al.}{2005}]{bat}
484: Barthelmy, S. D., et al. 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 143
485:
486: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blondin}{1994}]{blondin}
487: Blondin, J., M. 1994, ApJ, 436, 756
488:
489: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bozzo et al.}{2007}]{bozzo}
490: Bozzo, E., et al. 2007, in preparation
491:
492: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burrows et al.}{2005}]{xrt}
493: Burrows, D.N., Hill, J.E, Nousek, J.A., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 165
494:
495: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bondi \& Hoyle}{1944}]{bondi}
496: Bondi, H., \& Hoyle, F. 1944, MNRAS, 104, 273
497:
498: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Conti et al.}{1977}]{conti}
499: Conti, P., S., Myckky Leep, E., Lorre, J., J. 1977, ApJ, 214, 759
500:
501: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dickey \& Lockmann}{1990}]{nh}
502: Dickey \& Lockman, 1990, ARAA. 28, 215
503:
504: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Filliatre \& Chaty}{2004}]{filliatre}
505: Filliatre, P. \& Chaty, S., 2004, ApJ, 616, 469
506:
507: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gehrels et al.}{2004}]{swift}
508: Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005
509:
510: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{G\"otz et al.}{2006}]{disc}
511: G\"otz, D., Schanne, S., Rodriguez, J., et al. 2006, Astr. Tel., 813
512:
513: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Heap \& Corcoran}{1992}]{heap}
514: Heap, S., R. \& Corcoran, M., F. 1992, ApJ, 387, 340
515:
516: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Humphreys}{1978}]{humphreys}
517: Humphreys, R., M., 1978, AJ, 38, 309
518:
519: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Illarinov, A. \& Sunyaev,}{1974}]{illarinov}
520: Illarinov, A. \& Sunyaev, R. 1977, A\&A, 39, 181
521:
522: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{in't Zand}{2005}]{zand}
523: in't Zand, J.J.M. 2005, A\&A, 441, L1
524:
525: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kennea \& Campana}{2006}]{swiftatel}
526: Kennea, J.A., Campana, S. 2006, Astr. Tel., 818
527:
528: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{La Barbera et al.}{2003}]{labarbera}
529: La Barbera, A., et al. 2003, A\&A, 400, 993
530:
531: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lamers et al.}{1995}]{lamers}
532: Lamers, H., J., G., L., M., Snow, T., P., \& Lindholm, D., M., 1995,
533: ApJ, 455, 269
534:
535: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lamers \& Cassinelli}{1999}]{lamersbook}
536: Lamers, H., J., G., L., M. \& Cassinelli, J., P. 1999, in Introduction
537: to Stellar Winds (Camb. Univ. Press)
538:
539: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lebrun et al.}{2003}]{isgri}
540: Lebrun, F., Leray, J.-P., Lavocate, Ph., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L141
541:
542: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lund et al.}{2003}]{jemx}
543: Lund, N., Budtz-Joergensen, C., Westgaard, N. J., et al. 2003, A\&A,
544: 411, L231
545:
546: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lutovinov et al.}{2005}]{lutovinov05}
547: Lutovinov, A., Revnivtsev, M., Gilfanov, M., et al. 2005, A\&A, 444, 821
548:
549: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Masetti et al.}{2006}]{masetti06}
550: Masetti, N., et al. 2006, Astr. Tel., 815
551:
552: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mereghetti et al.}{2006}]{mereghetti}
553: Mereghetti, S., Sidoli, L., Paizis, A., \& G\"{o}tz, D. 2006, Astr. Tel., 814
554:
555:
556: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Negueruela et al.}{2006}]{negueruela}
557: Negueruela, I., et al., ApJ, 638, 982
558:
559: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pellizza et al.}{2006}]{pellizza}
560: Pellizza, L.J., Chaty, S., \& Negueruela, I. 2006, A\&A, 455, 653
561:
562: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rubin et al.}{1996}]{rubin96}
563: Rubin, B., C., Finger, M., H., Harmon, B., A., 1996, ApJ, 459, 259
564:
565: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schr\"{o}der et al.}{2004}]{schroeder}
566: Schr\"{o}der, S.E., et al. 2004, A\&A, 428, 149
567:
568: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sidoli et al.}{2006}]{sidoli}
569: Sidoli, L., Paizis, A., \& Mereghetti, S. 2006, A\&A, 450, L9
570:
571: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sguera et al.}{2005}]{sguera}
572: Sguera, V., Barlow, E.J., Bird, A.J., et al. 2006, A\&A, 444, 221
573:
574: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sguera et al.}{2006}]{sguera06}
575: Sguera, V., Bazzano, A., Bird, A.J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 452
576:
577: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Smith et al.}{2006}]{smith}
578: Smith, D.M., Heindl, W.A., Markwardt, C.B., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 974
579:
580: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ubertini et al.}{2003}]{ibis}
581: Ubertini, P., Lebrun, F., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L131
582:
583: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Walborn}{1973}]{walborn}
584: Walborn, N. R. 1978, AJ, 78, 1067
585:
586: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Walter et al.}{2006}]{walter06}
587: Walter, R., Zurita Heras, J., Bassani, L., et al. 2006, A\&A, 453, 133
588:
589: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{White et al.}{1983}]{white}
590: White, N.E., Swank, J.H., \& Holt, S.S. 1983, ApJ, 270, 711
591:
592: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Winkler et al.}{2003}]{integ}
593: Winkler, C., Courvoisier, T.J.-L., Di Cocco G., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L1
594:
595: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ziaeepour et al.}{2006}]{swiftgcn}
596: Ziaeepour, H., Burrows, D.N., Campana, S., et al. 2006, GCN Circ., 5687
597:
598: \end{thebibliography}
599:
600:
601: \end{document}
602: