1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %%
4: %% Beginning of file 'ms.tex'
5: %%
6: %% Modified 2005 December 5
7: %%
8: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
9: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
10:
11: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
12: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
13: %% any data that comes before this command.
14:
15: %% The command below calls the preprint style
16: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
17: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
18: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
19: %%
20:
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23:
24: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
25:
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27:
28: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
29:
30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
32: %% use the longabstract style option.
33:
34: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
35:
36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
38: %% the \begin{document} command.
39: %%
40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
43: %% for information.
44:
45: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
46: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
47:
48: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
49:
50: %\slugcomment{Submitted to\\
51: %{\it Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific}}
52:
53: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
54: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
55: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
56: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
57: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
58: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
59:
60: \shorttitle{Hubble ACS mosaic of M82}
61: \shortauthors{Mutchler et al.}
62:
63: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
64: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
69: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
70: %% you desire.
71:
72: \title{{\it Hubble Space Telescope} ACS mosaic \\
73: of the prototypical starburst galaxy M82}
74:
75: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
76: %% author and affiliation information.
77: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
78: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
79: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
80: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
81:
82: \author{M. Mutchler, H. E. Bond, C. A. Christian, L. M.
83: Frattare, \\ F. Hamilton, W. Januszewski, Z. G. Levay, M. Mountain, K. S. Noll,
84: P. Royle}
85: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
86: \email{mutchler@stsci.edu}
87:
88: \author{J. S. Gallagher}
89: \affil{University of Wisconsin}
90:
91: \and
92:
93: \author{P. Puxley}
94: \affil{National Science Foundation}
95:
96: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
97: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
98: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
99: %% affiliation.
100:
101: %\altaffiltext{1}{U.S. Department of State}
102:
103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
104: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
105: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
106: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
107: %% editorial office after submission.
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110:
111: In March 2006, the Hubble Heritage Team obtained a large 4-filter (B, V, I, and
112: H\( \alpha \)) 6-point mosaic dataset of the prototypical starburst galaxy NGC
113: 3034 (\objectname{M 82}), with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) onboard the
114: {\it Hubble Space Telescope} (HST). The resulting color composite Heritage image
115: was released in April 2006, to celebrate Hubble's 16th anniversary.
116:
117: Cycle 15
118: HST proposers were encouraged to submit General Observer and Archival Research
119: proposals to complement and/or analyze this unique dataset. Since our
120: \objectname{M 82} mosaics represent a significant investment of expert
121: processing beyond the standard archival products, we will also release our
122: drizzle-combined FITS data as a High-Level Science Product via the Multimission
123: Archive at STScI (MAST) in December 2006.
124:
125: This paper documents the key aspects of the observing program and image
126: processing: calibration, image registration and combination (drizzling), and the
127: rejection of cosmic rays and detector artifacts. Our processed FITS mosaics and
128: related information can be downloaded from:
129:
130: \url{http://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/m82/}
131:
132: \end{abstract}
133:
134: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
135: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
136: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
137: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
138:
139: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC 3034) --- galaxies: starburst --- techniques: image processing --- methods: data analysis}
140:
141: \section{Introduction}
142:
143: Last year, the {\it Hubble} and {\it Spitzer} space telescopes made
144: complementary optical and infrared mosaics, respectively, of The Whirlpool
145: Galaxy M51, see \citet{mut05,cal05}. This year, the starburst galaxy M82
146: received similar treatment, described by this paper and \citet{eng06},
147: respectively. Although we released the color composite image of the Hubble M82
148: mosaic in April 2006 (see press release URL below), the science data are
149: embargoed until December 2006.
150:
151: \objectname{M82} hosts the nearest (D=3.6 Mpc) example of a giant starburst
152: galaxy, with many key processes, such as super star clusters, ISM interfaces,
153: and outflows, occurring on scales that benefit from Hubble's high angular
154: resolution for their study.
155:
156: \section{Observations}
157:
158: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
159: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
160: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
161: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
162: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
163: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
164: %% is currently hosting the data.
165: %%
166: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
167: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
168: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
169: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
170: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
171:
172: Our observing program (HST proposal 10776) produced 96 individual exposures with
173: the ACS Wide Field Channel (WFC). The WFC is composed of two 4096x2048 pixel CCD
174: arrays butted together, with a small gap (equivalent to 50 pixels wide) between
175: them. The total WFC field-of view is about 200 square arcseconds. For each of
176: the four filters (Johnson B,V,I, and H\( \alpha \)), four exposures were
177: obtained at six slightly overlapping pointings or {}``tiles{}'' in a 3x2 mosaic,
178: at a telescope orientation of 130 degrees. The exposure times
179: for each filter are summarized in Table 1.
180:
181: The four exposures within each tile
182: were dithered. A small sub-pixel dither (2.5 x 1.5 pixels) improves the
183: rejection of detector artifacts as well as cosmic rays, coupled with a larger
184: dither which spans the interchip gap (5x60 pixels), so the combined mosaic will
185: not have strips of missing data there. These patterns are fully described on the
186: ACS dither webpage:
187:
188: \url{http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/proposing/dither/}
189:
190: \section{Pipeline data calibrations}
191:
192: The standard archival data was retrieved and automatically calibrated {\it
193: on-the-fly} via the Multimission Archive at STScI (MAST), after the best
194: calibration reference files became available (a few weeks after the
195: observations). This standard ACS pipeline (CALACS) processing includes bias,
196: dark, and flat-field corrections. The calibration reference files also
197: propagate data quality flags which identify many types of detector artifacts,
198: most of which were excluded during the {\tt MultiDrizzle} processing described
199: below. These include bad CCD columns, hot pixels (and their CTE tails), warm
200: pixels, and saturated pixels. For further details of standard calibrations are
201: provided in the ACS Data Handbook, \citet{pav05}. The latest calibration
202: reference files, and definitions of data quality flags are available on the ACS
203: website:
204:
205: \url{http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/analysis/reference\_files}
206:
207: As input to the drizzle-combination described below, we used the archival
208: flat-fielded images ({\tt \_flt.fits} or hereafter simply {\tt flt}). Since this
209: dataset is not associated, the pipeline currently generates single-image
210: drizzled output ({\tt \_drz.fits}) for each exposure. Although {\tt
211: MultiDrizzle} was added to the ACS pipeline in 2004, the HST ground system can
212: only combine associated datasets, and in any case, cannot assemble large
213: mosaics. In the standalone environment, however, {\tt MultiDrizzle} can be used
214: to combine any set of images, generating it's own association table ({\tt
215: \_asn.fits}) for all the input exposures. Note that this table also gets updated
216: with the shifts and rotations provided in the {\tt shiftfile}, to register the
217: mosaic (as described below).
218:
219: \section{Image registration}
220:
221: Our image combination software uses the World Coordinate System (WCS)
222: information in the image headers to align the images. This works very well for
223: data taken within the same visit, or otherwise utilizing the same guide stars.
224: Such data are typically aligned to within at least 0.2 WFC pixels (0.01 arcsec).
225: But mosaic datasets involving shifts larger than about 100 arcseconds
226: necessarily involve different guide stars in different visits, and so guide star
227: positional errors render the WCS unreliable for adequate image registration.
228:
229: We use stars in the images to register the frames, and since more stars are
230: detected in the I-band (F814W), we use those images to measure relative
231: positions and derive delta-shifts (relative to the WCS). We arbitrarily define
232: the first POS2 (visit 21) I-band frame (rootname {\tt j9l021d5q}) to be the
233: origin of our reference frame (0,0,0). Since the POS2 exposures for each filter
234: executed in the same visit, they are well-aligned to each other. Therefore, the
235: filter-to-filter registration is adequate, and we can apply the I-band shifts to
236: the other filters with confidence. After the I-band shifts were applied to the
237: other filters, their alignment was spot-checked, and individual stars across all
238: four filters were verified to be well-registered.
239:
240: We use {\tt tweakshifts} for the final refinement of the shifts.
241: But {\tt tweakshifts} only works within the regime where the images
242: to be registered are already aligned to within about 1 pixel, and with little
243: or no rotation involved. So the large shifts between the tiles must
244: be removed before we can run {\tt tweakshifts}.
245:
246: \subsection{Intertile shifts}
247:
248: The data for each tile were obtained in different visits, so the tiles can
249: therefore be misaligned on the order of 10 pixels, and rotated with respect to
250: each other due to the nominal roll of the spacecraft. Fewer stars are available
251: to measure these ``intertile'' shifts, since they must lie in the narrow tile
252: overlaps.
253:
254: These initial intertile shifts were measured using only the first of the four
255: frames within each tile. {\tt MultiDrizzle} was run only through the {\tt
256: driz\_separate} step, to generate the single-drizzled (distortion corrected {\tt
257: \_single\_sci.fits}) versions of these images in the undistorted mosaic output
258: space. We set {\tt {clean=no}} to save the {\tt \_single\_sci.fits} files, and
259: avoid altering the input {\tt flt} images by setting {\tt skysub=no} (no sky
260: subtraction). Suitable registration objects (preferably stars, but sometimes
261: clusters with a sharp peak) were visually selected: they must appear in multiple
262: frames, be free of obvious cosmic ray contamination, and not be saturated and
263: bleeding. With {\tt imexam}, the x,y positions of 10-20 objects were measured in
264: the tile overlap regions. The POS1, POS3, and POS5 tiles have long overlaps with
265: the POS2 reference tile, so objects were chosen which span the full length of
266: each overlap. The POS1 and POS6 tiles have very small overlaps with POS2, so
267: their shifts were measured iteratively, i.e. after the corrective shifts and
268: rotations had been applied to POS1, POS3, and POS5. Then stars in their much
269: larger overlaps with POS1 and POS6 could also be used to measure shifts, with
270: greater leverage.
271:
272: The measured star positions were used as input to the {\tt geomap} task, which
273: can solve for shifts and rotations. The corrections for the six primary
274: intertile frames were also applied to the other three frames in their respective
275: tiles, thereby internally registering the entire mosaic. The shifts and
276: rotations were assembled into a {\tt shiftfile}, to be provided as input to {\tt
277: MultiDrizzle}.
278:
279: \subsection{Intratile shifts}
280:
281: To generate the files needed for refining the shift measurement with {\tt
282: tweakshifts}, {\tt MultiDrizzle} was again run only through the {\tt
283: driz\_separate} step, applying the intertile delta-shifts derived above. Then
284: {\tt tweakshifts} was run for overlapping sets of I-band {\tt
285: \_single\_sci.fits} images, this time using all the images in each tile (not
286: just the first frame), such that the refinement includes any small ``intratile''
287: shifts. With a tolerance of 0.7 pixels and a 6 sigma threshold, {\tt
288: tweakshifts} typically detected on the order of 10,000 objects (most of which
289: are cosmic rays and other artifacts) and matched a few percent of those objects
290: within each tile. The rotations measured initially (as a check) were
291: insignificant, so we solved only for x,y shifts. These intratile refinements
292: were then summed with the initial intertile shifts, to create the shiftfiles
293: provided to {\tt MultiDrizzle} for the final image combinations.
294:
295: \section{Masking artifacts}
296:
297: In addition to the detector artifacts automatically flagged by the calibration
298: pipeline, we can manually mask observational artifacts that we'd similarly like
299: to exclude from our data, and which are too diffuse or large to get rejected
300: along with the cosmic rays. The variety of artifacts which might be seen are
301: described on the ACS anomalies webpage:
302:
303: \url{http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/performance/anomalies}
304:
305: First, we note two significant artifacts which we do not attempt to mask or
306: correct. This dataset was afflicted by some filter reflections (or ``optical
307: ghosts'') from several bright foreground stars, which appear as figure-8 or
308: doughnut features (see Figure 1). But since the ghosts overlap each other,
309: leaving no good data in any of the frames being combined, we chose not to mask
310: them. Some amplifier crosstalk is also evident in the mosaics, H\( \alpha \)
311: POS3 in particular, where both the bright star and galaxy create negative
312: mirror-image imprints in the opposite amplifier quadrant. This effect is not
313: significant, and we do not attempt to mask or correct it.
314:
315: Some satellite trails were masked and excluded as follows. The endpoints and
316: width of each satellite trail were measured in the undistorted {\tt
317: \_single\_sci.fits} images. Then the {\tt satmask} task (Richard Hook, private
318: communication) was used to generate a mask for each trail. This undistorted mask
319: was then transformed (using {\tt blot}) into the input distorted space of the
320: {\tt flt} images, assigned the unique flag value of 16384, and summed with the
321: existing {\tt flt} data quality array, e.g.{\tt
322: {j9l051gnq\_flt.fits{[}DQ,1{]}}}. Any such masking creates even more areas of
323: reduced signal-to-noise, and the affected areas are reflected in the weight
324: maps.
325:
326: \section{Image combination}
327:
328: The IRAF/STSDAS {\tt MultiDrizzle} task (Koekemoer et al., 2002) was used to
329: combine the mosaics for each filter. {\tt MultiDrizzle} is a PyRAF script which
330: performs, on a list of input {\tt flt} images: bad pixel identification, sky
331: subtraction, rejection of cosmic rays and other artifacts (as described above),
332: and a final {\tt drizzle} combination (Fruchter et al., 2002) with the cosmic
333: ray masks, into a clean image. {\tt MultiDrizzle} also applies the latest
334: filter-specific geometric distortion corrections to each image, as specified in
335: the IDCTAB reference tables. These mosaics were processed in the same
336: environment as the HST calibration pipeline (SunFire/smalls). See:
337:
338: \url{http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/analysis/multidrizzle/}
339:
340: Although the rejection of cosmic rays and other undesireable artifacts is
341: embedded in the {\tt MultiDrizzle} processing, the following is an overview of
342: how it is accomplished. A median image is constructed from the registered and
343: undistorted single-drizzled ({\tt \_single\_sci.fits}) images. This median image
344: -- or the appropriate sections of it -- are blotted back to the distorted space
345: of the input {\tt flt} images, where it can be used to identify cosmic rays. The
346: {\tt dither} package tasks of {\tt deriv} and {\tt driz\_cr} are used to compare
347: this blotted image and its derivative image with the original input {\tt flt}
348: file, and generate a cosmic ray mask. Finally, all the {\tt flt} images,
349: together with their newly created cosmic ray masks, are drizzled onto a single
350: output mosaic, which has units of electrons per second in each pixel.
351:
352: There are many {\tt MultiDrizzle} parameters which can be adjusted. The pipeline
353: uses carefully pre-defined sets of parameters (defined in the MDRIZTAB table
354: identified in image headers), but in the standalone environment, optimal
355: combination parameters for a specific dataset can be found through some
356: trial-and-error iterations. Here we describe our key parameter settings,
357: especially any non-default choices. The full set of drizzling parameters are
358: available in the README file on the MAST M82 webpage.
359:
360: We set the center of the output mosaic to be the coordinates for M82 given by
361: the NASA Extragalactic Database (in decimal degrees {\tt ra = 148.967580, dec =
362: 69.679704}), and rotate the output with north up, and east left ({\tt
363: final\_rot=0.0}). We set the output dimensions as 12288x12288 pixels, which truncates a small number of pixels in the corners of
364: the rotated mosaic (Figure 1). We provide a shiftfile to refine the mosaic
365: registration as described in the previous section.
366: Since the galaxy fills most of the mosaic, sky subtraction was turned off
367: ({\tt skysub=no}). We set {\tt crbit=0} so that our rejections do not get flagged in the data quality arrays of the input {\tt flt} images. Note that the
368: weight maps reflect the cosmic rays and artifacts rejected by
369: {\tt MultiDrizzle}. The cosmic ray rejection thresholds
370: ({\tt driz\_cr\_snr = 4.0 3.5}) were raised a bit to avoid rejecting the cores
371: of bright objects. Since these mosaics are so large, we did not build them
372: into multi-extension FITS files ({\tt build=no}), i.e. the science array and
373: weight maps are separate files, and we chose not to produce context images. Wet
374: set {\tt bits=4192} to ignore the flags for the warm pixels (flag=32) and CTE
375: tails of hot pixels (flag=64), which are flagged in the dark reference image,
376: and any rejections flagged by pipeline processing (flag=4096).
377: We use the default square drizzle kernel ({\tt final\_kernel=square}), which
378: performs well in most cases. Some correlated noise is evident as a faint
379: Moire-like pattern in the weight maps, which is also visible in the science data
380: -- especially in low signal-to-noise areas. Although the lanczos3 and gaussian
381: kernels can suppress this correlated noise better, they may also enhance
382: unrejected artifacts.
383:
384: The cosmic ray masks generated by {\tt MultiDrizzle} are used as input to the
385: final drizzle combination of all the images. The {\tt drizzle} task (Fruchter
386: and Hook, 2002) performs a weighted sum of the input images, and allows input
387: pixels to be shrunk (we set {\tt pixfrac=0.9}) before being mapped onto the
388: output plane. The output pixel scale ({\tt final\_scale}) can also be different
389: than the input (detector) pixel scale -- a smaller pixel scale can allow more
390: spatial information to be recovered if the data are well-dithered. Since our
391: 2-point sub-pixel dither pattern does not sample optimally in both dimensions,
392: even in conjuntion with the gap dither, we retain the input WFC pixel scale
393: (0.05 arcsec/pixel), rather than drizzle to a finer output scale.
394:
395: {\tt MultiDrizzle} also produces exposure weight maps, which indicate the
396: background and instrumental noise for each pixel in the science data. In
397: general, we acheived a relatively uniform exposure weight across the entire
398: mosaic. But the total exposure time can vary significantly from pixel-to-pixel,
399: mainly due to overlaps between adjacent tiles, interchip gaps, and all the bad
400: pixels which are rejected. The weight maps were visually inspected to ensure
401: that rejected artifacts have appropriately lower weight -- and equally
402: importantly, that real objects (e.g. the cores of stars, or of the core of M82)
403: were not rejected. The only irregular rejection was related to long diffraction
404: spikes and/or bleeding (from saturation) around bright foreground stars, which
405: is to be expected. Small amounts of residual artifacts or cosmic ray
406: contamination may have survived rejection -- most likely in areas of low
407: weight, such as the gap overlaps.
408:
409: The photometric fidelity of the {\tt MultiDrizzle} code is reliable to a high
410: degree of accuracy, since the underlying algorithm for drizzle is designed to be
411: flux-conserving (see Fruchter \& Hook, 2002, and Koekemoer et al., 2002). The
412: {\tt MultiDrizzle} team has verified this in practice by using a suite of test
413: datasets to compare photometry from different exposures of the same objects, and
414: verifying that these provide good agreement to better than the ACS flatfield and
415: photometric calibration accuracy (1-2\%) for bright sources, and Poisson noise
416: for fainter sources. But these M82 mosaics were not tested for photometric
417: accuracy, and were only spot-checked for PSF stability across the field.
418:
419:
420: \section{Data products and filenaming convention}
421:
422:
423: The drizzled mosaics described in this paper are available as
424: High-Level Science Products (HLSP) via the Multimission Archive at STScI (MAST):
425:
426: \url{http://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/m82/}
427:
428: The filenames of our drizzled science mosaics ({\tt \_drz\_sci.fits}) and their
429: corresponding exposure weight maps ({\tt \_drz\_weight.fits}), are listed in
430: Table 1. This filenaming convention allows these HLSP files to be queryable via
431: MAST archive searches. The filenames indicate the filter (b,v,i,h), and the
432: pixel scale of 0.05 arcsec (s05). These files have dimensions of 12288 x 12288
433: pixels (10.24 x 10.24 arcminutes) and are 604 MB each (uncompressed). Lower
434: resolution (1/4) block-averaged FITS versions of each mosaic were also produced
435: using the IRAF {\tt blkavg} task, mainly for quick-look downloading and viewing,
436: or for educational purposes (not intended for scientific analysis). These have a
437: scale of 0.20 arcsec per pixel (s20 in the filenames), dimensions of 3072 x 3072
438: pixels, and are 38 MB each, or 1/16 the filesize of the full-resolution mosaics
439: above. Much smaller preview GIF images of these mosaics are also available on
440: the MAST website. Note that the FITS data are all oriented with north up, and
441: east to the left (as in Figure 1), whereas the press release color composite
442: image (Figure 3) is at a position angle of 130 degrees. The color composite
443: image and related information are available from the associated STScI and Hubble
444: Heritage press releases:
445:
446: \url{http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/2006/14/}
447:
448: \url{http://heritage.stsci.edu/2006/14/}
449:
450:
451: \section{Acknowledgments}
452:
453: Thanks to STScI Director Matt Mountain for granting 24 orbits of Director's
454: Discretionary observing time to the Hubble Heritage Team to conduct this
455: program. Thanks also to Warren Hack, Chris Hanley, Richard Hook, Marco
456: Sirianni, Anton Koekemoer, Inga Kamp, Karen Levay, Faith Abney, and Randy
457: Thompson for their contributions to this project.
458:
459: If you utilize these prepared mosaics for further scientific analysis, please
460: acknowledge and/or reference this paper.
461:
462:
463: \begin{thebibliography}{}
464:
465: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2005)]{cal05} Calzetti, D., et al., \apj, 633, 871-893
466:
467: \bibitem[Engelbracht, et al.(2006)]{eng06} Engelbracht, C. W., et al., \apj, 642, 127-132
468:
469: \bibitem[Fruchter et al.(2002)]{fru02} Fruchter, A., \& Hook, R., 2002, \pasp, 114, 144
470:
471: \bibitem[Koekemoer et al.(2002)]{koe02} Koekemoer. A. et al., 2002, HST Calibration
472: Workshop, Ed. S. Arribas, A. M. Koekemoer, B. Whitmore (STScI: Baltimore), p.337
473:
474: \bibitem[Mutchler et al.(2005)]{mut05} Mutchler, M., et al., 2005, \baas, 37, 2
475:
476: \bibitem[Pavlovsky et al.(2005)]{pav05} Pavlovsky, C., et al., 2005, ACS Data Handbook, version 4.0
477:
478: \end{thebibliography}
479:
480: \clearpage
481:
482: \begin{table}
483: \begin{center}
484: \caption{Filters, total exposure times, and mosaic filenames.\label{tbl-1}}
485: \begin{tabular}{crrrr}
486: \tableline\tableline
487: Filter & Exposure Time & Science Mosaic & Weight Map \\
488: \tableline
489: F435W (B) & 1600s & h\_m82\_b\_s05\_drz\_sci.fits & h\_m82\_b\_s05\_drz\_weight.fits \\
490: F555W (V) & 1360s & h\_m82\_v\_s05\_drz\_sci.fits & h\_m82\_v\_s05\_drz\_weight.fits \\
491: F814W (I) & 1360s & h\_m82\_i\_s05\_drz\_sci.fits & h\_m82\_i\_s05\_drz\_weight.fits \\
492: F658N (H\( \alpha \)) & 3320s & h\_m82\_h\_s05\_drz\_sci.fits & h\_m82\_h\_s05\_drz\_weight.fits \\
493: \tableline
494: \end{tabular}
495: \tablecomments{Via MAST, low resolution FITS and GIF versions of the files above are also available.}
496: \end{center}
497: \end{table}
498:
499: \clearpage
500:
501: \begin{figure}
502: \includegraphics[scale=1.00,angle=0]{f1.eps}
503: \caption{Raw B-band (F435W) mosaic (intertiles only) illustrating the
504: orientation and some key features of the 3x2 mosaic data. The mosaic files have
505: dimensions of 12288 x 12288 pixels (10.24 x 10.24 arcminutes). With north up
506: and east to the left, the data is truncated slightly in each corner.
507: \label{fig1}}
508: \end{figure}
509:
510: \clearpage
511:
512: \begin{figure}
513: \includegraphics[scale=1.50,angle=0]{f2.eps}
514: \caption{Close-up of M82 galactic features in all four filters. North is not up
515: here.
516: \label{fig2}}
517: \end{figure}
518:
519: \clearpage
520:
521: \begin{figure}
522: \includegraphics[scale=0.50,angle=-90]{f3.eps}
523: \caption{Color composite mosaic of M82 made from all four filters. Note this
524: press release image is at a position angle of 130 degrees (north is not up
525: here).
526: \label{fig3}}
527: \end{figure}
528:
529: \end{document}
530: