1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\myemail}{naoi@ir.isas.jaxa.jp}
4: \newcommand{\cer}{$E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S}$}
5:
6: \slugcomment{final version; 061221}
7:
8: \shorttitle{Near-infrared extinction in Coalsack}
9: \shortauthors{Naoi et al.}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13:
14: \title{Near-infrared extinction in the Coalsack Globule 2}
15:
16:
17: \author{Takahiro Naoi\altaffilmark{1},
18: Motohide Tamura\altaffilmark{2},
19: Tetsuya Nagata\altaffilmark{3},
20: Yasushi Nakajima\altaffilmark{2},
21: Hiroshi Suto\altaffilmark{2},
22: Koji Murakawa\altaffilmark{4},
23: Ryo Kandori\altaffilmark{2},
24: Sho Sasaki\altaffilmark{5},
25: Shogo Nishiyama\altaffilmark{2},
26: Yumiko Oasa\altaffilmark{6},
27: and Koji Sugitani\altaffilmark{7}}
28:
29: \altaffiltext{1}{ISAS, JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara-shi,
30: Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}
31: \altaffiltext{2}{NAOJ, NINS, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
32: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University,
33: Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
34: \altaffiltext{4}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie,
35: Auf dem H\"ugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany}
36: \altaffiltext{5}{NAOJ, NINS, 2-12 Hoshigaoka, Mizusawa-shi,
37: Iwate 023-0861, Japan}
38: \altaffiltext{6}{Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University,
39: 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan}
40: \altaffiltext{7}{Graduate School of Natural Sciences, Nagoya City University,
41: Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8501, Japan}
42:
43:
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47:
48: We have conducted $J$, $H$, and $K_S$
49: imaging observations for the Coalsack Globule 2
50: with the SIRIUS infrared camera on the IRSF 1.4 m telescope at SAAO,
51: and determined the color excess ratio, $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S}$.
52: The ratio is determined in the same photometric system as
53: our previous study for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds
54: without any color transformation;
55: this enables us to directly compare
56: the near-infrared extinction laws among these regions.
57: The current ratio $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_{S}} = 1.91 \pm 0.01$ for
58: the extinction range $0.5 < E_{J-H} <1.8$
59: is significantly larger than the ratios for the
60: $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds ($E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_{S}} = 1.60$--1.69).
61: This ratio corresponds to a large negative index $\alpha = 2.34 \pm 0.01$
62: when the wavelength dependence of extinction is approximated
63: by a power law $A_\lambda \propto \lambda ^{-\alpha}$,
64: which might indicate
65: little growth of dust grains, or
66: larger abundance of dielectric non-absorbing components
67: such as silicates, or both
68: in this cloud.
69: We also confirm that
70: the color excess ratio for the Coalsack Globule 2 has a trend
71: of increasing with decreasing optical depth,
72: which is the same trend as the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds have.
73:
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \keywords{dust, extinction --- ISM: globules --- ISM: individual (Coalsack)}
77:
78:
79: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82:
83: Precise determination of the wavelength dependence of extinction is
84: necessary to understand the properties of interstellar dust
85: because differences in the extinction law are attributed to
86: a variation in the dust grains.
87: %
88: Differences in extinction laws among various lines of sight throughout the
89: optical and UV properties of the spectrum are widely accepted
90: (e.g., Fitzpatrick 1999).
91: The existence of a corresponding variation at somewhat longer wavelengths
92: is a controversial issue \citep{whi88,mat90,ken98}.
93: %
94: For near-infrared wavelengths, recent studies (e.g., Messineo et
95: al. 2005, Nishiyama et al. 2006) have found that the extinction law
96: seems to change from one line of sight to another.
97: These results indicate that the so-called universality
98: (e.g., Mathis 1990) does not necessarily hold for infrared wavelengths.
99:
100: The color excess ratio, \cer, is one of the simplest parameters available to
101: express the near-infrared extinction law, which can be determined
102: only from $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ photometric observations.
103: In the observations, however, different photometric systems and transformation
104: between them can cause difficult problems in
105: comparing the extinction laws in different regions.
106: Naoi et al. (2006) have shown that the photometry transformation
107: between different photometric systems does not
108: reproduce the real color excess ratio probably because the transformation is
109: mainly determined from the photometry of intrinsically red stars,
110: not reddened stars.
111: Hence, Naoi et al. (2006) have conducted imaging observations for the
112: $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds with the same photometric system, and
113: have not found any significant differences in the extinction law, \cer,
114: between the clouds in contrast to previous works \citep{ken98,gom01}.
115: Naoi et al. (2006) have suspected that the apparent difference of
116: the color excess ratio, \cer,
117: was caused by the transformation between different photometric systems,
118: at least for these two dark clouds.
119:
120: Racca et al. (2002) observed the Coalsack and determined the
121: color excess ratio $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K} = 2.08 \pm 0.03$,
122: which is significantly larger than the ratios for other clouds
123: (the mean value of $1.61 \pm 0.04$, Whittet 1988).
124: They suggested possible changes in grain chemistry
125: with extinction or star formation activity.
126: Though the color excess ratios for
127: the $\rho$ Oph ($1.57 \pm 0.03$, Kenyon et al. 1998),
128: Cha ($1.80 \pm 0.03$, G\'omez \& Kenyon 2001), and
129: Coalsack (Racca et al. 2002) clouds were all expressed in the same CIT system,
130: the photometric system used in the actual observations are different,
131: and the color transformation between them made the comparison very difficult.
132:
133: Hence we have conducted $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ imaging observations
134: for the Coalsack Globule 2 (about 3 mag deeper than that of Racca et al. 2002)
135: with the same photometric system (SIRIUS/IRSF) as in Naoi et al. (2006)
136: for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds, and
137: determined the color excess ratio $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S}$.
138: We discuss the extinction law of the Coalsack Globule 2 in addition to
139: the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds \citep{nao06}, and
140: also discuss the grain properties in comparison with
141: extinction model calculations.
142:
143:
144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
145:
146: \section{Observations}
147:
148: We acquired $J$ (1.25 $\mu$m), $H$ (1.63 $\mu$m), and $K_S$ (2.14 $\mu$m)
149: images of the Coalsack Globule 2 in March--April 2004
150: with the Simultaneous Infrared Imager for Unbiased Survey (SIRIUS) on the
151: Infrared Survey Facility (IRSF) 1.4 m telescope at the South
152: African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO) in Sutherland, the Republic of
153: South Africa. Dichroic mirrors enabled simultaneous observations
154: in the three bands (see Nagashima et al. 1999 and Nagayama et al. 2003
155: for the details on the instrument).
156: The camera is equipped with three
157: 1024$\times$1024 pixel HgCdTe (HAWAII) arrays.
158: The pixel scale of the array was 0\farcs453 pixel$^{-1}$,
159: giving a field of view of 7\farcm7$\times$7\farcm7.
160:
161: We acquired 20 s exposure sets for 3 times.
162: Ten dithered frames were obtained for one set of exposures.
163: Total integration time is 10 minutes for each position.
164: Relative positional offsets of dithering were 20\arcsec or 25\arcsec.
165: Typical seeing conditions were
166: 1\farcs3, 1\farcs2, and 1\farcs1 (FWHM)
167: in the $J$ , $H$, and $K_S$ bands, respectively.
168: The observations were made at air masses between 1.0
169: and 1.5. Dark and twilight flat frames were obtained at the beginning
170: and end of each night. We observed standard stars from
171: the faint near-infrared standard-star catalog of Persson et al. (1998)
172: for photometric calibration on the same night.
173:
174: The target region
175: encompasses heavily extinguished part
176: of the Globule 2 in Coalsack determined from optical
177: extinction and radio CO maps
178: \citep{rac02,kat99}.
179: We also observed a reference region in order to estimate the intrinsic color,
180: which lies very close to the target region and
181: falls in regions of relatively low extinction \citep{rac02}.
182: The observed areas are summarized in Table \ref{tbl_obs}.
183:
184: We used NOAO's Imaging Reduction and Analysis Facility
185: (IRAF)\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
186: National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO),
187: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
188: Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
189: Science Foundation.}
190: software package to reduce the data. We applied the
191: standard procedures of near-infrared array image reduction, including
192: dark current subtraction, sky subtraction, and flat fielding.
193: Each image, following subtraction of the average dark
194: frame, was divided by the normalized flat-field image. Then the
195: thermal emission pattern, the fringe pattern due to OH emission,
196: and the reset anomaly slope pattern of the HAWAII arrays were
197: corrected for each frame, with subtraction of a median sky
198: frame. Identification and photometry of point sources in the all
199: frames were performed with using the DAOPHOT packages in
200: IRAF. The $10\sigma$ limiting magnitudes ($\leq0.1$ mag) for point sources
201: were $J \sim 19.0$, $H\sim18.3$, and $K_S\sim17.0$ mag.
202: We used these point sources in analysis,
203: but the point sources brighter than $J < 12.0$,
204: $H < 11.0$, and $K_S < 10.0$ (less than 1\% of the total) were not
205: included in our samples because they were saturated.
206:
207:
208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
209:
210: \section{Results and determining of the color excess ratio \cer}
211:
212: Figure \ref{fig_dst} shows $J-H$ vs. $H-K_S$ color-color diagrams
213: of point sources for the Globule 2 and the reference region in Coalsack.
214: The photometry data described in this paper
215: is in the SIRIUS/IRSF photometric system
216: because we do not use any transformation equations to
217: other photometric systems for photometry
218: in order to avoid possible sources of errors \citep{nao06}.
219: In Table \ref{tbl_obs}, the numbers of identified point sources are also shown.
220:
221: In order to determine the color excess ratio, \cer,
222: for the Coalsack Globule 2, we
223: employ the powerful method developed by Kenyon et al. (1998).
224: The method determines the ratio accurately even when a number of
225: PMS stars are present in the sample \citep{nao06}.
226: We assume
227: that the stellar population behind the cloud is identical to the stellar
228: population in the reference region. The point source distribution in a
229: color-color diagram is transformed to the density distribution by a
230: kernel density estimator with the kernel as triweight.
231: Figure \ref{fig_ctr} shows
232: $J-H$ vs. $H-K_S$ density distributions drawn from Figure \ref{fig_dst}
233: for the Globule 2 and the reference region in Coalsack.
234: Contours are drawn in a logarithmic scale
235: (the same as for all figures below).
236: These color distributions use a kernel density estimator
237: with a smoothing parameter $h = 0.2$ to derive the density,
238: which is roughly twice the 1 $\sigma$ error
239: of our photometry at the survey limits.
240: The sum of multiplications of the density distributions between the target and
241: reference regions provides the reddening probability distribution,
242: which is defined as the probability of measuring a pair of color
243: excesses, $E_{J-H}$ and $E_{H-K_S}$.
244: Figure \ref{fig_prb} shows $E_{J-H}$ vs. $E_{H-K_S}$ reddening
245: probability contours for the Coalsack Globule 2.
246: We derive the slopes of the reddening vector,
247: namely the color excess ratio $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S}$,
248: by tracing the ridge of contours
249: on the reddening probability distribution which is divided
250: into the circular annuli centered on the origin.
251: The slope of the reddening locus \cer is determined by a
252: least-squares fit of a straight line with data having errors in both
253: $x$ and $y$ coordinates (see Naoi et al. 2006 for more details).
254: The analysis yields
255: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S} = 1.91 \pm 0.01$
256: (for $0.50 < E_{J-H} < 1.8$) in the SIRIUS/IRSF photometric system,
257: and the result is summarized in Table \ref{tbl_cer}.
258: In Figure \ref{fig_prb},
259: the enlargement with plots of the ridgeline on contour and the best fit lines
260: for the different extinguished parts are also shown for clearness.
261:
262:
263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
264:
265: \section{Extinction law in the Coalsack Globule 2}
266:
267: Table \ref{tbl_cer} shows
268: the compilation of the color excess ratios, \cer,
269: for the Coalsack Globule 2 and
270: for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds \citep{nao06}.
271: The color excess ratio for the Coalsack Globule 2 ($1.91 \pm 0.01$)
272: is significantly larger than those for the mean values of the
273: $\rho$ Oph ($1.65 \pm 0.03$) and Cha ($1.67 \pm 0.01$) clouds.
274: Moreover, the value in the Coalsack Globule 2 is higher than those
275: in any sub-regions of the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds.
276: These results indicate that a real variation
277: in the near-infrared extinction law occurs from cloud to cloud
278: (see also, Nishiyama et al. 2006
279: for the case of the observations toward the Galactic Center).
280: The result in the Coalsack Globule 2 supports
281: the relatively large ratio indicated by Racca et al. (2002).
282: The shape of the extinction curve is frequently characterized
283: by a law of the form $A_{(\lambda)} \propto \lambda^{-\alpha}$,
284: where $\alpha$ is the spectral index for near-infrared extinction
285: (e.g., Draine 2003).
286: A good fit to the curve for $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ bands is obtained with
287: $\alpha = 2.34 \pm 0.01$ by using the mean effective wavelength
288: of the filters \citep{nis06};
289: this index is very large compared to the values in other regions
290: (e.g., Whittet 1988 shows a mean value of $\alpha = 1.70 \pm 0.08$).
291:
292:
293: Such a large color excess ratio, $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S}$,
294: and a large spectral index, $\alpha$, in the Coalsack
295: are realized when the upper cutoff of the grain size distribution of radius
296: is kept around 0.2 $\mu$m,
297: and also if we assume greater dielectric material ratio.
298: Figure \ref{fig_calc} shows the calculations of the color excess ratio
299: and the index $\alpha$ as a function of the upper cutoff of the
300: grain size distribution of radius, $a_+$, and the silicate/graphite ratio
301: in the simple MRN model in Naoi et al. (2006).
302: This may indicate that dust grains in the globule
303: do not grow in size so much compared with the standard grain size
304: $\sim 0.1$ $\mu$m in diffuse interstellar medium (e.g., Mathis 1977).
305: Also, similar model calculations indicate that non-absorbing dielectric
306: materials such as silicates cause rapidly decreasing extinction towards
307: the longer wavelength,
308: and result in large color excess ratios and large spectral indices
309: because the efficiency of the scattering cross section varies
310: in inverse proportion to the fourth power of the wavelength
311: (Rayleigh scattering, e.g., Bohren \& Huffman 1983).
312:
313:
314: We also confirm a systematic shift in the major axis
315: of the probability contour in Figure \ref{fig_prb}.
316: The plots of the ridgeline on contour and the best fit lines
317: for the different extinguished parts
318: %$E_{J-H} = 2.05 E_{H-K_S} - 0.06$ (for $0.5 < E_{J-H} < 1.0$; solid line) and
319: %$E_{J-H} = 1.89 E_{H-K_S} + 0.01$ (for $1.3 < E_{J-H} < 1.8$; dashed line)
320: are also shown in the enlargement.
321: The color excess ratio has a trend of decreasing from
322: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S} = 2.02$--2.08 for $0.5 < E_{J-H} < 1.0$ (solid line) to
323: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S} = 1.87$--1.91 for $1.3 < E_{J-H} < 1.8$ (dashed line).
324: The trend is consistent with those in Naoi et al. (2006) for the
325: $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds.
326: Kenyon et al. (1998) suggests that the color excess ratio
327: in the $\rho$ Oph cloud decreases from
328: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K} = 1.65$ for $0.3 < E_{J-H} < 0.4$ to
329: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K} = 1.56$--1.57 for $1.5 < E_{J-H} < 1.8$.
330: Kenyon et al. (1998) also indicates a large color excess ratio
331: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K} \sim 2$ for the much weaker extinction range at
332: $E_{J-H} < 0.2$ in the cloud.
333: They suspect that this change might be statistically insignificant.
334: In our case, however, the larger number of reference sources allows us
335: to determine the ratio more precisely.
336: In order to verify the trend, the color excess ratios are determined
337: for the two groups of the sample areas which are defined by the distance
338: from the center of the Globule 2 in Kato et al. (1999);
339: (a) the ``inside'' sample (radius $< 250$ arcsec), and
340: %the number of point sources is 3248, and
341: (b) the ``outside'' sample (radius $> 250$ arcsec).
342: %the number of point sources is 3988.
343: The results are complied in Table \ref{tbl_cer}.
344: The color excess ratio for the ``inside'' sample
345: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S} (\textrm{in}) = 2.01 \pm 0.03$ is
346: smaller than that for the ``outside'' sample
347: $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S} (\textrm{out}) = 2.50 \pm 0.05$
348: in the same optical depth range of $0.7 < E_{J-H} < 1.2$.
349: The trend of the systematic shift in the major axis
350: of the probability contour in Figure \ref{fig_prb}
351: is thus verified.
352: As suggested by Naoi et al. (2006) for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha
353: clouds, this indicates grain growth with optical depth, toward the
354: inside of the dark cloud, also in the Coalsack Globule 2.
355: Therefore, although the grain size in the Coalsack Globule 2 seems to be
356: small compared with other dark clouds, a slight change in size might be
357: taking place from its periphery to the central region.
358:
359:
360: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
361:
362: \section{Conclusions}
363: \begin{enumerate}
364: \item
365: We have conducted $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ band imaging observations
366: for the Coalsack Globule 2 with SIRIUS/IRSF 1.4m at SAAO and
367: determined the color excess ratio, \cer,
368: by using the method in Kenyon et al. (1998) and Naoi et al. (2006).
369: \item
370: The color excess ratio for the Coalsack Globule 2 has a
371: significantly larger value
372: than those for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds \citep{nao06}.
373: Because of employing the same photometric system,
374: our studies are simple and straightforward
375: in comparison of near-infrared extinction laws.
376: \item
377: The extinction law for the Coalsack Globule 2 shows a trend that
378: the color excess ratio decreases with
379: increasing optical depth.
380: The trend indicated grain growth inside of the cloud,
381: consistent with the results in Naoi et al. (2006)
382: for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha clouds.
383: \item
384: The large color excess ratio for the Coalsack Globule 2 could be
385: attributed to
386: small grain growth and grain composition differences.
387: \end{enumerate}
388:
389:
390: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
391:
392: \acknowledgments
393:
394: We are grateful to the SIRIUS/IRSF and SAAO staff,
395: Yoshifusa Ita, Noriyuki Matsunaga, Yoshikazu Nakada, Toshihiko Tanab\'e,
396: and Cynthia Strydom for their help in support of observations.
397: T.N. are also grateful to Koji Kawabata for the calculation of extinction,
398: and University of Tokyo, NAOJ, and ISAS/JAXA staffs
399: for support and assistance in this study.
400: We wish to thank the anonymous referee and editors for careful comments.
401: This work is supported by grants-in-aid from
402: the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture
403: (Nos. 12309010, 16340061, 16077204, and 15340061).
404:
405:
406: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
407:
408: \begin{thebibliography}{}
409: %\bibitem[Bohlin et al.(1978)]{boh78}
410: %Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., \& Drake, J. E. 1978, \apj, 224, 132
411: \bibitem[Bohren \& Huffman(1983)]{boh83}
412: Bohren, C. F., \& Huffman, D. R. 1983,
413: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, New York
414: \bibitem[Draine(2003)]{dra03}
415: Draine, B. T. 2003, \araa, 41, 241
416: %\bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{dra84}
417: %Draine, B. T., \& Lee, H. M. 1984, \apj, 285, 89
418: \bibitem[Fitzpatrick(1999)]{fit99}
419: Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, \pasp, 111, 63
420: \bibitem[G\'omez \& Kenyon(2001)]{gom01}
421: G\'omez, M., \& Kenyon, S. J 2001, \aj, 121, 974
422: \bibitem[Kato et al.(1999)]{kat99}
423: Kato, S., Mizuno, N., Asayama, S., Mizuno, A., Ogawa, H., \&
424: Fukui, Y. 1999, \pasj, 51, 883
425: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(1998)]{ken98}
426: Kenyon, S. J., Lada, E. A., \& Barsony, M. 1998, \aj, 115, 252
427: %\bibitem[Kurucz(1993)]{kur93}
428: %Kurucz, R. L. 1993, CD-ROM No. 13
429: %\bibitem[Laor \& Draine(1993)]{lao93}
430: %Laor, A., \& Draine, B. T. 1993, \apj, 402, 441
431: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{mat90}
432: Mathis, J. S. 1990, \araa, 28, 37
433: \bibitem[Mathis et al.(1977)]{mat77}
434: Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., \& Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, \apj, 217, 425
435: \bibitem[Messineo et al.(2005)]{mes05}
436: Messineo, M., Habing, H. J., Menten, K. M., Omont, A., Sjouwerman, L. O., \&
437: Bertoldi, F. 2005, \aap, 435, 575
438: \bibitem[Nagashima et al.(1999)]{nag99}
439: Nagashima, C., et al. 1999, Star Formation 1999, ed. T. Nakamoto (Nobeyama: Nobeyama Radio Obs.), 397
440: \bibitem[Nagayama et al.(2003)]{nag03}
441: Nagayama, T., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 459
442: \bibitem[Naoi et al.(2006)]{nao06}
443: Naoi, T., et al. 2006, \apj, 640, 373
444: \bibitem[Nishiyama et al.(2006)]{nis06}
445: Nishiyama, S. et al. 2006, \apj, 638, 839
446: \bibitem[Persson et al.(1998)]{per98}
447: Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krazeminski, W., Roth, M., \& Rieke, M. J. 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
448: \bibitem[Racca et al.(2002)]{rac02}
449: Racca, G., G\'omez, M., \& Kenyon, S. 2002, \aj, 124, 2178
450: %\bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rie85}
451: %Rieke, G. H., \& Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, \aj, 288, 618
452: %\bibitem[Tokunaga \& Vacca(2005)]{tok05}
453: %Tokunaga, A. T., \& Vacca, D. W. 2005, \pasp, 117, 421
454: \bibitem[Whittet(1988)]{whi88}
455: Whittet, D. C. B. 1988, Dust in the Universe, Cambridge University Press, 25
456: \end{thebibliography}
457:
458:
459: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
460:
461: %\end{document}
462:
463: \clearpage
464:
465: \begin{figure}
466: %\epsscale{1.00}
467: \plottwo{./f1a.eps}{./f1b.eps}
468: \caption{$J-H$ vs. $H-K_S$ color-color diagrams of point sources
469: for the Globule 2 and the reference region in Coalsack.\label{fig_dst}}
470: \end{figure}
471:
472: \begin{figure}
473: %\epsscale{1.00}
474: \plottwo{./f2a.eps}{./f2b.eps}
475: \caption{$J-H$ vs. $H-K_S$ density distributions drawn from Fig.\ref{fig_dst}
476: for the Globule 2 and the reference region in Coalsack.\label{fig_ctr}}
477: \end{figure}
478:
479: \begin{figure}
480: %\epsscale{1.00}
481: \plottwo{./f3a.eps}{./f3b.eps}
482: \caption{$E_{J-H}$ vs. $E_{H-K_S}$ reddening probability contour
483: for the Coalsack Globule 2 and the enlargement.
484: The plots of the ridgeline on contour (cross marks) and the best fit lines
485: $E_{J-H} = 2.05 E_{H-K_S} - 0.06$ (for $0.5 < E_{J-H} < 1.0$; solid line) and
486: $E_{J-H} = 1.89 E_{H-K_S} + 0.01$ (for $1.3 < E_{J-H} < 1.8$; dashed line)
487: are also shown in the enlargement.
488: The bold parts of the lines correspond to the fit ranges of the ridgeline.
489: \label{fig_prb}}
490: \end{figure}
491:
492: \begin{figure}
493: %\epsscale{1.00}
494: \plotone{./f4.eps}
495: \caption{Model calculations of the color excess ratio, $E_{J-H}/E_{H-K_S}$
496: (solid curves) and
497: the spectral index, $\alpha$ (dashed curves)
498: as a function of the upper cutoff of the grain size distribution of
499: radius, $a_+$,
500: for the different silicate/graphite ratios in MRN (53/47; bold curves) and
501: 90 \% (90/10; fine curves).
502: The large color excess ratio and spectral index in the Coalsack
503: can be produced by increasing the abundance ratio of the silicate grain
504: which is the representative material of non-absorbing grains.
505: Spectral index $\alpha$ is fitted for the mean effective wavelengths of the
506: $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ bands in the SIRIUS/IRSF photometric system \citep{nis06}.
507: \label{fig_calc}}
508: \end{figure}
509:
510:
511: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
512:
513: \clearpage
514:
515: \begin{table}
516: \begin{center}
517: \caption{Center coordinates (J2000.0) of the target and reference regions
518: and the number of identified point sources.\label{tbl_obs}}
519: \begin{tabular}{ccr}
520: \tableline\tableline
521: Region & R.A., Dec. & Number \\
522: \tableline
523: Globule 2 & 12 31 24, -63 45 11 & 7236 \\
524: & (10\farcm0 $\times$ 10\farcm0) & \\
525: \tableline
526: Reference & 12 33 20, -64 24 39 & 15679 \\
527: & (12\farcm0 $\times$ 12\farcm0) & \\
528: \tableline
529: \end{tabular}
530: \end{center}
531: \end{table}
532:
533:
534: \begin{table}
535: \begin{center}
536: \caption{Determined color excess ratios, \cer, for the Coalsack Globule 2
537: with the $\rho$ Oph and Cha regions\tablenotemark{a}
538: (SIRIUS/IRSF photometric system).\label{tbl_cer}}
539: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
540: \tableline\tableline
541: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Region} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\cer} &
542: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Range ($E_{J-H}$)} \\
543: \tableline
544: Coalsack & Globule 2 & $1.91\pm0.01$ & 0.50--1.80 \\
545: & inside\tablenotemark{b} & $2.01\pm0.03$ & 0.70--1.20 \\
546: & outside\tablenotemark{b} & $2.50\pm0.05$ & 0.70--1.20 \\
547: $\rho$ Oph & L1688 & $1.60\pm0.01$ & 0.50--2.35 \\
548: & L1689 & $1.66\pm0.01$ & 0.50--1.70 \\
549: & L1712 & $1.68\pm0.01$ & 0.50--1.50 \\
550: Cha & I & $1.69\pm0.01$ & 0.50--2.00 \\
551: & II & $1.66\pm0.01$ & 0.50--1.80 \\
552: & III & $1.67\pm0.02$ & 0.50--1.30 \\
553: \tableline
554: \end{tabular}
555: \tablenotetext{a}{The color excess ratios \cer for the $\rho$ Oph and Cha
556: clouds are from Naoi et al. (2006)}
557: \tablenotetext{b}{The samples of the ``inside'' group are selected by the
558: distance (radius $< 250$ arcsec, the number of point sources is 3248)
559: from the center coordinate in Kato et al. (1999).
560: The samples of the ``outside'' are all the other point sources
561: except for the ``inside'' samples (the number of point sources is 3988).}
562: \end{center}
563: \end{table}
564:
565: \end{document}
566: