1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[10pt,preprint2]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{emulateapj}
5: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
6: \newcommand{\myemail}{urata@heal.phy.saitama-u.ac.jp}
7: \slugcomment{ApJ Letters accpeted}
8: \shorttitle{Early optical afterglow of GRB041006}
9: \shortauthors{Urata et al.}
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{Very early multi-color observations of the plateau phase of GRB 041006 afterglow}
12:
13: \author{
14: Y \textsc{Urata}\altaffilmark{1,2},
15: K.Y. \textsc{Huang}\altaffilmark{3},
16: Y.L. \textsc{Qiu}\altaffilmark{4},
17: J. \textsc{Hu}\altaffilmark{4},
18: P.H. \textsc{Kuo}\altaffilmark{3},
19: T. \textsc{Tamagawa}\altaffilmark{2},
20: W.H. \textsc{Ip}\altaffilmark{3},
21: D. \textsc{Kinoshita}\altaffilmark{3},
22: H. \textsc{Fukushi}\altaffilmark{5},
23: M. \textsc{Isogai}\altaffilmark{6},
24: T. \textsc{Miyata}\altaffilmark{6},
25: Y. \textsc{Nakada}\altaffilmark{6},
26: T. \textsc{Aoki}\altaffilmark{6},
27: T. \textsc{Soyano}\altaffilmark{6},
28: K. \textsc{Tarusawa}\altaffilmark{6},
29: H. \textsc{Mito}\altaffilmark{5},
30: K. \textsc{Onda}\altaffilmark{1}
31: M. \textsc{Ibrahimov}\altaffilmark{7}
32: A. \textsc{Pozanenko}\altaffilmark{8}
33: and
34: K. \textsc{Makishima}\altaffilmark{2,9}
35: }
36:
37: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Saitama University, Shimo-Okubo, Saitama, 338-8570, Japan}
38: \altaffiltext{2}{RIKEN (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}
39: \email{urata@heal.phy.saitama-u.ac.jp}
40: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, Chung-Li 32054, Taiwan, Republic of China}
41: \altaffiltext{4}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China}
42: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan}
43: \altaffiltext{6}{Kiso Observatory, Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Mitake-mura, Kiso-gun, Nagano 397-0101, Japan}
44: \altaffiltext{7}{Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute, Tashkent 700052, Uzbekistan}
45: \altaffiltext{8}{Space Research Institute, 84/32 Profsoyuznaya Str, Moscow 117997, Russia}
46: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
47:
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50:
51: Observations of the optical afterglow of GRB 041006 with the Kiso
52: Observatory 1.05 m Schmidt telescope, the Lulin Observatory 1.0 m
53: telescope and the Xinglong Observatory 0.6 m telescope. Three-bands
54: ($B$, $V$ and $R$) of photometric data points were obtained on 2004
55: October 6, 0.025$-$0.329 days after the burst. These very early multi
56: band light curves imply the existence of a color dependent plateau
57: phase. The $B$-band light curve shows a clear plateau at around 0.03
58: days after the burst. The $R$ band light curve shows the hint of a
59: plateau, or a possible slope change, at around 0.1 days after the
60: burst. The overall behavior of these multi-band light curves may be
61: interpreted in terms of the sum of two separate components, one
62: showing a monotonic decay the other exhibiting a rising and a falling
63: phase, as described by the standard afterglow model.
64:
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \keywords{Gamma-ray Bursts: afterglow}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: Based on the standard afterglow model (e.g. Sari, Piran and Narayan
72: 1998), an optical light curve can be expected to consist of a
73: combination of four power-law segments, with connections at certain
74: break frequencies. The break frequencies are the self-absorption
75: frequency ($\nu_{sa}$), the typical frequency ($\nu_m$) and the
76: cooling frequency ($\nu_{c}$). Before the {\it HETE-2} era, almost
77: all GRB light curves showed only the $\nu > \nu_c$ segment
78: characterized by a single declining or achromatic break. Note that the
79: standard afterglow model predicts the existence of a peak at an early
80: time when the typical synchrotron $\nu_{m}$ frequency crosses into the
81: optical frequency. Before the peak time $(\nu_{opt} < \nu_m)$, the
82: luminosity increases proportional to $t^{1/2}$, until reaching the
83: maximum flux $F_{\rm max}$ at $\nu=\nu_{m}$; the subsequent decay of
84: the luminosity is proportional to $t^{3(1-p)/4}$, where $p$ is the
85: index of the power-law distribution of energetic electrons accelerated
86: at the shock. Since the break time varies with the frequency,
87: multi-color observations of the very early afterglow are required, so
88: as to catch $\nu_{m}$ in the optical wavelength. Up to now, there have
89: only been a few cases (such as GRB 021004; Urata et al 2005a) for
90: which early time multi-color data are available.
91:
92: GRB 041006 was detected with {\it HETE-2} at 12:18:08 UT on 2004
93: October 06. The Wide-Field X-ray Monitor (WXM; Shirasaki et al 2003)
94: localized the burst in real time, resulting in a GCN alert 42 seconds
95: after the burst trigger. The flight error region was a circle with a
96: $14'$ radius (90\% confidence level) centered at
97: $\alpha^{2000}=00^{\rm h}54^{\rm m}54^{\rm s}$,
98: $\delta^{2000}=01^{\circ}18' 37''$. Spectral analysis showed the 2-30
99: keV fluence of this event to be $5\times10^{-6} {\rm erg/cm^{2}}$ and
100: the 30-400 keV fluence to be $7\times10^{-6} {\rm erg/cm^{2}}$: the
101: ratio between these two values means that it can be classified as an
102: ``X-ray rich GRB''. The light curve shape of the gamma-ray pulse of
103: GRB 041006 is very similar to that of GRB 030329 but, its spectral
104: characteristics are 20 times fainter. GRB 041006 shows a soft
105: precursor before the main gamma-ray pulse (Galassi et al. 2004).
106: %%
107: At 1.4 hours after the burst, the optical afterglow was found within
108: the $14'$-radius error circle at the following coordinates:
109: $\alpha^{2000}=00^{\rm h}54^{\rm m}50^{\rm s}.17$,
110: $\delta^{2000}=01^{\circ}14' 07''$ (Da Costa et al. 2004). The
111: redshift was determined by Price et al. (2004) using the
112: Gemini North telescope to be $z=0.716$.
113:
114: \section{Observations}
115:
116: The follow-up observations of the GRB 041006 optical afterglow at
117: the Kiso, Lulin and Xinglong Observatories were carried out within the
118: framework of the East Asia Follow-up Observation Network (EAFON, Urata
119: et al. 2005b). The 1.05 m Schmidt telescope and a $2k\times2k$ CCD
120: camera at the Kiso observatory were used to make 300 sec exposure $B$,
121: $V$, and $R$ band imaging observations, starting at 12:51 UT on 2004
122: October 6 (0.009 days after the burst). The field of view is
123: $51'.2\times51'.2$, and the pixel size is $1''.5$ square. Before
124: receiving the report by Da Costa et al. (2004), we had attempted to
125: cover the entire {\it HETE-2} error region. We made $B$, $V$, and $R$
126: band imaging observations of 300 sec exposure each. The afterglow was
127: clearly detected in all bands. In order to image simultaneously the
128: optical afterglow and several Landolt standard stars in SA92 (Landolt
129: 1992), we pointed the telescope 5 arcmin to the east (Figure
130: \ref{grb041006image}).
131:
132: The $R$ band observations were performed using the 0.6 m telescope at
133: the Xinglong Observatory, starting at 2004 October 6 (14:33 UT; 0.094
134: days after the burst). The filed of view is $10'.1\times 10'.1$, and
135: the pixel size is $0''.47$ square. The $B$ and $R$ band observation
136: of the afterglow was also performed with the Lulin-One-meter-Telescope
137: \citep{lot} on the night of October 6 ($0.320-0.329$ days after the
138: burst). Additional $B$, $V$, $R$ and $I$ band observations were made
139: by the Maidnak 1.5 m telescope on October 6. The time coverage of the
140: observations was from 0.149 to 0.188 days after the burst.
141:
142: \section{Analysis}
143:
144: The data reduction was carried out using the standard package NOAO
145: IRAF package. We performed the bias-subtraction and flat-fielding
146: correction using the appropriate calibration data. We calibrated the
147: flux zero-point of our images through a comparison with the SA92
148: standard star field. We also performed cross calibrations of our
149: photometric results using several field stars for which the magnitudes
150: have been calibrated by Henden (2004). The difference of photometric
151: zero points between our SA92 and Henden's filed photometry is within
152: 0.04 mag. Aperture photometry for all the data was performed using
153: the APPHOT package of IRAF. The photometric results are summarized in
154: Table \ref{grb041006obs}.
155:
156: \section{Results}
157:
158: \subsection{Light curves}
159:
160: The multi-band light curves of the GRB 041006 afterglow are shown in
161: Figure \ref{grb041006lc}. In addition to our $B$, $V$ and $R$ band
162: data, there are several unfiltered observations, the $R$ band data
163: points reported in the GCN Circulars (Yost et al. 2004; Ayani \&
164: Yamaoka 2004; Fugazza et al. 2004; Monfardini et al. 2004; Misra \&
165: Pandey 2004; Kahharov et al. 2004; Kinugasa \& Torii 2004), and a
166: number of published $R$ and $V$ band data points (Soderberg et
167: al. 2005; Stanek et al. 2005) were included in Figure 2. The $B$-band
168: light curve showed a clear plateau at around 0.03 days after the
169: burst, although its behavior in earlier epochs remains
170: unknown. Interestingly, the $R$ band light curve shows a hint of a
171: plateau, or a possible slope change, around 0.1 days after the burst.
172: These observational results indicate that the $B$, $V$ and $R$ band
173: photometric points obtained by EAFON play an important role in
174: characterizing the temporal evolution of the afterglow.
175:
176: As is obvious in the Figure \ref{grb041006lc}, the single power law
177: fit ($\alpha=-0.95$, $\chi^{2}/\nu=5.76$ with $\nu$=56) of the $R$
178: band light curve is poorly described. It is also unlikely that the
179: $V$ band light curve can be described with the single power law
180: ($\alpha = -0.72$, $\chi^{2}/\nu=1.54$ with $\nu$=9). On the other
181: hand, the data subsets at $t<0.04$ days and $t>0.15$ days can be
182: described successfully by two separate single power-law models. For
183: the $R$ band, we have obtained $\alpha= -0.91\pm0.12$ with
184: $\chi^{2}/\nu= 0.30$ for $\nu= 2$ before 0.04 days, and $\alpha=
185: -1.12\pm0.02$ with $\chi^{2}/\nu =1.44$ for $\nu =48$ after 0.15 days;
186: for the $V$ band $\alpha= -0.59\pm0.03$ with $\chi^{2}/\nu= 0.41$ for
187: $\nu= 3$ before 0.04 day, and $\alpha= -1.41\pm0.30$ with
188: $\chi^{2}/\nu =0.19$ for $\nu =1$ after 0.15 days From this point of
189: view, the overall behavior of these multi band light curves may then
190: be understood as the sum of two separate components, one showing a
191: monotonic decay with the other having a rising and a falling phase.
192:
193: \subsection{Color change of the afterglow}
194:
195: The photometric results were corrected for Galactic reddening, using
196: the reddening map of Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis (1998). The
197: Galactic reddening toward the burst is $E(B-V$)= 0.022, which implies
198: a Galactic extinction of $A_{B}= 0.094$ and $A_{R}= 0.058$. Although
199: the light curves in Figure \ref{grb041006lc} suggest a significant
200: color change within $<0.1$ days, our data coverage is insufficient to
201: make a conclusion about such a possibility. Accordingly, for
202: simplicity's sake we assume that at $t>0.15$ days the power-law
203: spectrum of the afterglow has a constant index. The observed color,
204: $B-R=0.83\pm0.28$ mag, then indicates a spectral index of
205: $\beta\sim-1.24\pm0.42$ in terms of $f(\nu)\propto \nu^{\beta}$. This
206: is close to the value of $\beta=-1.07\pm0.02$, which is predicted by
207: the spherically symmetric model of Sari, Piran, \& Halpern (1999) in
208: the regime of $\nu_{c}<\nu_{opt}$ in combination with the measured
209: $\alpha=-1.118\pm0.016$.
210:
211: \section{Discussion}
212:
213: We observed the GRB 041006 optical afterglow from the very early phase
214: ($\sim0.03$ days after the burst) in three bands. Although the
215: relatively early phase of a dozen afterglows such as GRB 990123
216: \cite{akerlof}, multi-color observations of very early optical
217: afterglow are still rare. In the GRB 021004 case, the very early
218: optical afterglow shows a clear achromatic re-brightening phase which
219: peaks was at around $\sim0.07$ days \citep{kiso}. On the other hand,
220: the afterglow behavior of GRB 041006 depends on its color. The $B$
221: band light curve shows a clear plateau at around 0.03 days after the
222: burst, although its behavior in earlier epochs remains unknown. The
223: $R$ band light curve shows the hint of a plateau, or a possible slope
224: change, around 0.1 days after the burst.
225:
226: Several models, based on the standard afterglow model, can be used to
227: explain the variability in the light curve, such as the variable
228: external density (e.g. Lazati et al. 2002), refreshed shock (Rees \&
229: M\'esz\'aros 1998; Kumar \& Piran 2000a; Sari \& M\'esz\'aros 2000),
230: and patchy shell models (Kumar \& Piran 2000b). To explain the present
231: multi-band light curves, these models require similar temporal
232: behavior in each band. If the light curve of GRB 041006 does not show
233: a color change, it should have two bumps with almost the same
234: amplitudes. The patchy shell model is not suitable to explain current
235: light curves in this case. This is because the model predicts that
236: the amplitude of the fluctuations in the afterglow light cure is
237: expected to decrease with time proportional to the Lorentz factor.
238:
239: The suggested second component may be identified with the brightening
240: phase of Sari et al's standard afterglow model (1998) which predicts
241: the evolution to consist of four phases involving a convex-shaped
242: period; the brightening phase can be expressed with a power-law index
243: of 0.5. To describe the plateau phase together with the
244: monotonically decreasing first component, we use the single power law,
245: plus a smoothly broken power law function expressed as
246: \begin{eqnarray}
247: F_{\nu}(t) =\frac{F^{*}_{\nu}}{[(t/t_{b})^{\alpha_{1}}+(t/t_{b})^{\alpha_{2}}]},
248: \end{eqnarray}
249: with $\alpha_{1}$ fixed at 0.5 after Sari et al. (1998). We obtain an
250: acceptable fit for the $R$ band light curve with $\alpha=-1.07\pm0.01$,
251: $\alpha_{2}=-1.49\pm0.03$ and $t_{b}=0.143\pm0.012$
252: ($\chi^{2}/\nu=1.19$ with $\nu=66$). We also fit the $B$ and $V$ band
253: light curves with the same function. For better constraints, we fix
254: the $\alpha_{1}=-1.0$ for $B$ band and $\alpha_{2}=-1.4$ of the $V$
255: band. Due to the lack of data points for the first components in the
256: $B$ band, and the former components in the $V$ band., these vales come
257: from the result of $R$ band fitting. For the $B$ band, we obtained
258: $\alpha_{2}=-1.47\pm0.07$ and $t_{b}=0.0675\pm0.005$
259: ($\chi^{2}/\nu=0.47$ with $\nu=7$); for the $V$ band,
260: $\alpha=-1.08\pm0.02$ and $t_{b}=0.073\pm0.006$ ($\chi^{2}/\nu=0.83$
261: with $\nu=8$). In Figure \ref{grb041006lc}, these best fit functions
262: are superposed on the $B$, $V$ and $R$ band data points. Based on the
263: equation (Sari et al. 1998)
264:
265: \begin{equation}
266: \nu_{m} = 5.7 \times 10^{14} \epsilon_B^{1/2} \epsilon_e^2
267: E_{52}^{1/2} t_d^{-3/2} {\rm \ Hz},
268: \end{equation}
269: we can estimate the strength parameter of the magnetic field $\epsilon_{B}$
270: and/or the injected electrons parameter $\epsilon_{e}$ as follows;
271: $\epsilon_{B}^{1/2}\epsilon_{e}^{2}=4.1\times10^{-3}$. This value is
272: consistent with the result of Panaitescu \& Kumar (2001, 2002) which
273: was estimated from late-time multi-frequency afterglow observations.
274:
275: About the first component, the decay index is $\alpha=-0.92$ and the
276: back-extrapolated power-law function can successfully account for the
277: point at 14.4 min after the burst observed by ROTSE-III
278: \citep{yost}. The temporal index is considered to be directly related
279: to the prompt emission, as observed in the case of GRB 990123
280: \citep{akerlof} or GRB 030418 \citep{rykoff}. However, the temporal
281: index is inconsistent with the values ($-0.5$ or $-2$) predicted by a
282: reverse shock model \citep{kobayashi}. Thus the first component is not
283: likely to be an optical flash, such as is the case for GRB 990123.
284: Considering the above discussions one of possible explanation is that
285: these emissions come from multiple jets and/or sub-jets (Nakamura
286: 2000, Yamazaki et al. 2004). In the multiple jet case, the former
287: emissions and the latter components are caused by narrower and wider
288: jets, respectively.
289:
290: \section{Conclusion}
291:
292: Thanks to our EAFON observations, we have obtained early B, V and R
293: band possible re-brightening episode for GRB 041006. While there are
294: several other afterglows similar to GRB 050319 (Wozniak et al 2005;
295: Huang et al 2006) and GRB 050525a \citep{klotz} for which the early
296: optical behaviors may possibly be similar to that of GRB 041006, their
297: physical mechanism is not clear, due to the general lack of
298: color/spectrum information on the early optical afterglows. The
299: present work has provided some hints for the current shallow decaying
300: of the X-ray and optical behaviors.
301:
302: \acknowledgments
303:
304: We thank the staff and observers at the Kiso, Lulin and XingLong
305: observatories for the various arrangements. Y.U acknowledges support from
306: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through JSPS
307: Research Fellowships for Young Scientists. This work is also partly
308: supported by grants NSC 94-2752-M-008-001-PAE, NSC 94-2112-M-008-002,
309: and NSC 94-2112-M-008-019.
310:
311:
312: \begin{thebibliography}{}
313: \bibitem[Akerlof et al. 1999]{akerlof} Akerlof, C., et al. 1999, Nature,
314: 398, 400
315: \bibitem[Ayani and Yamaoka 2004]{ayani} Ayani, K., \& Yamaoka, H. 2004, GCN
316: Circ. 2779
317: %\bibitem[Berger et al. 2003]{berger} Berger, E., et al. 2003, Nature, 426,
318: 154
319: \bibitem[Da Costa et al. 2004]{opt} Da Costa,G., Novel, G. \& Price, P.A. 2004,
320: GCN Circ 2765
321: \bibitem[Fugazza et al. 2004]{fug} Fugazza, D. et al. 2004, GCN Circ 2782
322: \bibitem[Galassi et al. 2004]{galassi} Galassi, M., et al. 2004, GCN Circ
323: 2770
324: \bibitem[Henden et al. 2004]{henden} Henden, A., 2004, GCN Circ 2801
325: \bibitem[Huang et al(2006)]{050319} Huang, K. Y., et al. 2006, ApJL accepted
326: %\bibitem[Huang et al. 2005a]{lulin} Huang, K-Y., et al. 2005, Il CIMENTO in
327: %press (astro-ph/0506236)
328: \bibitem[Kahharov et al. 2004]{kahh} Kahharov, B.,Asfandiyarov,
329: I.,Ibrahimov, M., Sharapov, D., Pozanenko, A., Rumyantsev, V. \& Beskin, G.
330: 2004, GCN Circ 2775
331: \bibitem[Kinuhgasa et al. 2004]{mon} Kinugasa, K., \& Torii, K. 2004, GCN
332: Circ 2832
333: \bibitem[Kinoshita et al. 2005]{lot} Kinoshita, D., et al. 2005, ChJAA, 5,
334: 315
335: \bibitem[Klotz et al. 2005]{klotz} Klotz, A., Boe\"r, M., Atteia. J.D.,
336: Stratta, G., Behrend, R., Malacrino, F. \& Damerdji, Y. 205, A\&A, 439, 35
337: \bibitem[Kobayashi 2000]{kobayashi} Kobayashi, S. 2000, \apj, 545, 807
338: \bibitem[Kumar and Piran]{kumara} Kumar, P., \& Piran, T. 2000a, \apj, 532,
339: 286
340: \bibitem[Kumar and Piran]{kumarb} Kumar, P., \& Piran, T. 2000b, \apj, 535,
341: 152
342: \bibitem[Landolt (1992)]{landolt} Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
343: \bibitem[Lazzati et al. 2002]{lazati} Lazzati, D., Rossi, D.,Covino, S.,
344: Ghisellini, G \& Malesani, D. 2002 A\&A, 396, L5
345: \bibitem[Misra et al. 2004]{misra} Misra, K. \& Pandey, S.B. 2004, GCN Circ
346: 2794
347: \bibitem[Monfardini et al. 2004]{mon} Monfardini, A., et al. 2004, GCN Circ
348: 2790
349: \bibitem[Nakamura et al. 2000]{naka} Nakamura, T. 2000, \apj, 534, 159
350: \bibitem[Panaitescu and Kumar (2001)]{param} Panaitescu, A., \& Kumar, P.
351: 2001, \apj, 560, L49
352: \bibitem[Panaitescu and Kumar (2002)]{param2} Panaitescu, A., \& Kumar, P.
353: 2002, \apj, 571, 779
354: \bibitem[Rees and M\'esz\'aros]{rees} Rees, M. J., \& Me\'sza\'ros, P. 1998,
355: ApJ, 496, L1
356: \bibitem[Price et al. 2004]{price} Price, P.A. 2004, GCN Circ 2791
357: \bibitem[Rykoff et al. 2004]{rykoff} Rykoff, E.S., et al. 2004, \apj, 601,
358: 1013
359: \bibitem[Sari et al., (1998)]{sari2} Sari, R., Piran, T. \& Narayan, R.
360: 1998, \apj, 497, L17
361: \bibitem[Sari et al., (1999)]{sari3} Sari, R., Piran, T. \& Halpwrn, J. P.
362: 1999, \apj, 519, L17
363: \bibitem[Sari and M\'esz\'aros]{sari} Sari, R., \& M\'esz\'aros, P. 2000, \apj, 535,
364: L33
365: \bibitem[Schlegel et al., (1999)]{map} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. \&
366: Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
367: \bibitem[Shirasaki et al., (2003)]{wxm} Shirasaki, Y., et al. 2003, PASJ, 55, 1033
368: \bibitem[Soderberg et al 2005]{soderberg} Soderberg, A. et al. 2005, \apj, 636, 391
369: \bibitem[Stanek 2005]{stanek} Stanek, K. Z. et al. 2005, \apj, 636, L5
370: %\bibitem[Urata et al. 2003]{system} Urata, Y. 2003, Rome2002 proceedings
371: \bibitem[Urata et al. 2003]{020813} Urata, Y., et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L21
372: \bibitem[Urata et al. 2004]{030329} Urata, Y., et al. 2004, ApJ, 601, L17
373: \bibitem[Urata et al. 2005a]{eafon} Urata, Y., et al. 2005a, Il Nuovo CIMENTO, 28, 775
374: \bibitem[Urata et al. 2005b]{kiso} Urata, Y., et al. 2005b, Nuovo CIMENTO, 28, 779
375: \bibitem[Wozniak et al. 2005]{050319} Wozniak, P. R., Vestrand, W. T., Wren,
376: J. A., White, R. R., Evans, S. M., Casperson, D. 2005, \apj, 627, L13
377: \bibitem[Yamazaki et al. 2005]{yamazaki} Yamazaki, R., Ioka, K \& Nakamura, T. 2004, \apj, 607, L103
378: \bibitem[Yost et al. 2004]{yost} Yost, S., Smith, D.A.,Rykoff, E.S. \& Swan,
379: H. 2005, GCN Circ. 2776
380:
381: \end{thebibliography}
382: %\bibitem[]{}
383:
384: \begin{figure}[htb]
385: \begin{center}
386: %\includegraphics{GRB041006_image.ps}
387: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f1.eps}
388: \caption{An $R$ band image of the GRB 041006 field taken at the Kiso
389: observatory. The circles indicate the afterglow and standard
390: stars. North is up; east is left.}
391: \label{grb041006image}
392: \end{center}
393: \end{figure}
394:
395:
396: \begin{figure}[htb]
397: \begin{center}
398: %\includegraphics{lc3.eps}
399: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f2.eps}
400: \caption{$B$, $V$ and $R$ band light curves produced based on the Kiso, Lulin and Beijing results together with SSO\cite{soderberg},
401: MMT\cite{stanek} and several GCNs. The dotted lines indicate the best
402: fit model functions described in the text. The dashed lines indicate
403: the model components of the best fit function for the $R$ band
404: lightcurve.}
405: \label{grb041006lc}
406: \end{center}
407: \end{figure}
408:
409: %\clearpage
410:
411: \begin{table}[htb]
412: \begin{center}
413: \caption{Log of follow-up observations of the afterglow of GRB 041006.\label{grb041006obs}}
414: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
415: \tableline\tableline
416: Date & Start Time(UT) & Delay (days) &Filter & Exposure (s) & mag & Site\\
417: \tableline
418: 2004-10-06 & 13:13:04 & 0.040 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 18.900$\pm$0.055 & Kiso \\
419: 2004-10-06 & 13:20:05 & 0.045 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 18.965$\pm$0.058 & Kiso \\
420: 2004-10-06 & 13:27:05 & 0.050 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 18.890$\pm$0.070 & Kiso \\
421: 2004-10-06 & 15:07:22 & 0.119 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.696$\pm$0.074 & Kiso \\
422: 2004-10-06 & 16:09:02 & 0.162 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.997$\pm$0.074 & Mt. Maidanak \\
423: 2004-10-06 & 16:27:48 & 0.175 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 20.122$\pm$0.078 & Mt. Maidanak \\
424: 2004-10-06 & 19:57:08 & 0.320 & $B$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 21.004$\pm$0.188 & Lulin \\
425: \hline
426: %%
427: 2004-10-06 & 14:38:52 & 0.099 & $V$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.141$\pm$0.117 & Kiso \\
428: 2004-10-06 & 14:52:56 & 0.109 & $V$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.316$\pm$0.145 & Kiso \\
429: 2004-10-06 & 16:03:40 & 0.158 & $V$ & 240 s $\times$ 1 & 19.564$\pm$0.057 & Mt. Maidanak \\
430: 2004-10-06 & 16:14:57 & 0.166 & $V$ & 240 s $\times$ 1 & 19.677$\pm$0.078 & Mt. Maidanak \\
431: 2004-10-06 & 16:33:28 & 0.179 & $V$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.752$\pm$0.074 & Mt. Maidanak \\ \hline
432: %%
433: 2004-10-06 & 12:51:20 & 0.025 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 17.799$\pm$0.040 & Kiso \\
434: 2004-10-06 & 12:58:21 & 0.030 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 17.988$\pm$0.063 & Kiso \\
435: 2004-10-06 & 13:05:23 & 0.035 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 18.152$\pm$0.080 & Kiso \\
436: 2004-10-06 & 14:32:51 & 0.094 & $R$ & 120 s $\times$ 1 & 18.97$\pm$0.23 & Beijing \\
437: 2004-10-06 & 15:16:15 & 0.124 & $R$ & 120 s $\times$ 1 & 18.89$\pm$0.24 & Beijing \\
438: %
439: 2004-10-06 & 15:49:32 & 0.149 & $R$ & 180 s $\times$ 1 & 19.211$\pm$0.067 & Mt. Maidanak \\
440: 2004-10-06 & 15:54:56 & 0.152 & $R$ & 180 s $\times$ 1 & 19.231$\pm$0.075 & Mt. Maidanak \\
441: 2004-10-06 & 16:19:59 & 0.170 & $R$ & 180 s $\times$ 1 & 19.229$\pm$0.074 & Mt. Maidanak \\
442: 2004-10-06 & 16:39:30 & 0.183 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.544$\pm$0.076 & Mt. Maidanak \\
443: 2004-10-06 & 16:46:28 & 0.189 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 19.371$\pm$0.156 & Mt. Maidanak \\
444: %
445: 2004-10-06 & 20:02:54 & 0.324 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 20.349$\pm$0.090 & Lulin \\
446: 2004-10-06 & 20:09:25 & 0.329 & $R$ & 300 s $\times$ 1 & 20.314$\pm$0.092 & Lulin \\ \hline
447: \tableline
448: \end{tabular}
449: \end{center}
450: \end{table}
451:
452: \end{document}
453: