1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: % \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
7: %\usepackage{booktabs}
8: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters }
9:
10: \shorttitle{DISENTANGLING THE HERCULES STREAM}
11: \shortauthors{BENSBY ET AL.}
12:
13: %=====================================================================
14: % MACROS
15: \newcommand\teff{T_{\rm eff}}
16: \newcommand\kms{\rm\,km\,s^{-1}}
17: \newcommand\zmin{z_{\rm min}}
18: \newcommand\zmax{z_{\rm max}}
19: \newcommand\ulsr{U_{\rm LSR}}
20: \newcommand\vlsr{V_{\rm LSR}}
21: \newcommand\wlsr{W_{\rm LSR}}
22: \newcommand\uasym{U_{\rm asym}}
23: \newcommand\vasym{V_{\rm asym}}
24: \newcommand\wasym{W_{\rm asym}}
25: \newcommand\usigma{\sigma_{\rm U}}
26: \newcommand\vsigma{\sigma_{\rm V}}
27: \newcommand\wsigma{\sigma_{\rm W}}
28: \newcommand\uw{(U_{\rm LSR}^2+W_{\rm LSR}^2)^{1/2}}
29: \newcommand\uvw{(U_{\rm LSR}^2 + V_{\rm LSR}^2 + W_{\rm LSR}^2)^{1/2}}
30:
31: %=====================================================================
32: \begin{document}
33:
34: %=====================================================================
35: \title{
36: Disentangling the Hercules stream\altaffilmark{1}
37: }
38: \author{
39: T. Bensby,\altaffilmark{2}
40: M.S. Oey,\altaffilmark{2}
41: S. Feltzing,\altaffilmark{3}
42: and
43: B. Gustafsson\,\altaffilmark{4}
44: }
45:
46: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations collected with the MIKE spectrograph
47: on the 6.5\,m Magellan/Clay telescope at the Las Campanas observatory in
48: Chile}
49: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan,
50: 830 Dennison Building, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA;
51: {\tt tbensby@umich.edu, msoey@umich.edu}}
52: \altaffiltext{3}{Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE-221\,00 Lund, Sweden;
53: {\tt sofia@astro.lu.se}}
54: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy and Space Physics, University
55: of Uppsala, Box 515, SE-751\,20 Uppsala, Sweden;
56: {\tt bg@astro.uu.se}}
57:
58: %=====================================================================
59: \begin{abstract}
60: Using high-resolution spectra of nearby F and G dwarf
61: stars, we have investigated the detailed abundance and age structure of the
62: Hercules stream. We find that the stars in the stream
63: have a wide range of stellar ages, metallicities, and element abundances.
64: By comparing to existing samples of stars in the solar neighbourhood with
65: kinematics typical of the Galactic thin and thick disks we find
66: that the properties of the Hercules stream
67: distinctly separate into the abundance and age trends
68: of the two disks. Hence, we find it unlikely that the
69: Hercules stream is a unique Galactic stellar population, but rather a
70: mixture of thin and thick disk stars. This points
71: toward a dynamical origin for the Hercules stream, probably caused by the
72: Galactic bar.
73: \end{abstract}
74:
75: \keywords{
76: Galaxy: disk ---
77: Galaxy: formation ---
78: Galaxy: evolution ---
79: solar neighbourhood ---
80: stars: abundances ---
81: stars: kinematics
82: }
83:
84: %==============================================================================
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: The stellar velocity distribution in the solar neighbourhood
88: is manifoldly structured
89: \citep[see, e.g.,][]{dehnen1998a,skuljan1999,famaey2005,helmi2006,
90: arifyanto2006}. Prominent features are the Pleiades-Hyades super-cluster,
91: the Sirius cluster, and the Hercules stream (also known as the $u$-anomaly).
92: From a large sample of nearby G and K giants \cite{famaey2005}
93: found that the Hercules stream makes up approximately 6\,\% of the stars in the
94: solar neighbourhood, and that they have a net drift of
95: $\sim 40\,\kms$ directed radially away from the Galactic centre. Just
96: as for the Galactic thick disk, their orbital velocities around the Galaxy
97: lag behind the local standard of rest (LSR) by $\sim 50\,\kms$
98: (see also \citealt{ecuvillon2006astroph} who found
99: similar properties for the Hercules stream using nearby F and G dwarf stars).
100:
101: Numerical simulations have shown that the excess of stars at
102: $(\ulsr,\vlsr)\approx(-40,\,-50)\,\kms$ can be
103: explained as a signature of the Galactic bar
104: \citep[e.g.,][]{raboud1998,dehnen1999,dehnen2000,fux2001}.
105: If it is a chaotic process, where stars gets gravitaionally scattered from the
106: inner Galactic regions by the bar, or if they are coupled to the outer
107: Lindblad resonance of the bar is, however, uncertain \citep{fux2001}.
108: Either way, this points to an origin for the Hercules stream
109: that is related to the inner disk regions. So, is the Hercules stream a
110: distinct stellar population with a unique origin and evolutionary history,
111: or is it a mixture of different populations?
112:
113: Using available data in the literature \cite{soubiran2005} found that most
114: Hercules stars tend to follow the thin disk abundance trends. They, however,
115: concluded that the existing knowledge about the chemical properties of the
116: Hercules stream did not admit safe conclusions about the origin of the
117: stream. We note that the distinct
118: and well separated chemical signatures that the two disks exhibit
119: \citep{fuhrmann2004,bensby2003,bensby2004,bensby2005,mishenina2004,feltzing2006}
120: are less separated in the abundance plots in
121: \cite{soubiran2005} (compare, e.g., the abundance trends for oxygen in
122: their Fig.~10 with Fig.~10 in \citealt{bensby2004}). This is likely an effect
123: of merging different data sets, each containg different systematic
124: errors.
125:
126: To further study the origin of the Hercules stream we have observed a sample
127: of 60 F and G dwarf stars, all kinematically selected to be members of the
128: stream. By performing a strictly differential detailed abundance analysis
129: of the Hercules stream stars relative to stars of the two disk populations
130: previously studied by us \citep{bensby2003,bensby2005}
131: we minimise uncertainties due to systematic errors in the analysis.
132:
133: In this letter we focus on two elements that
134: show distinct abundance trends for the thin and thick disks:
135: Mg \citep[e.g.,][]{fuhrmann2004,feltzing2003,bensby2003,bensby2005} and
136: Ba \citep[e.g.,][]{mashonkina2003,bensby2005}.
137: Other $\alpha$-elements, iron peak elements, and $r$- and $s$-process
138: elements will be presented in an upcoming paper
139: (Bensby et al.~2007, in prep.), wherein we also will
140: describe the observations, data reductions, abundance analysis, etc.
141: \citep[see, however,][where the results for a few other elements are briefly
142: presented]{bensby2006mru}.
143:
144:
145:
146: %==============================================================================
147: \section{Identification of Hercules stream stars} \label{sec:sample}
148:
149: \begin{figure}
150: \centering
151: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{
152: \includegraphics[bb=50 28 540 760, clip, angle=-90]{f1.ps}}
153: \caption{
154: Velocity distribution of the F and G dwarf stars in the
155: \cite{nordstrom2004} catalogue
156: (where $v_{\rm pec}\equiv(\ulsr^2 + \vlsr^2 + \wlsr^2)^{1/2}$).
157: The Hercules stream (Her), the Hyades-Pleiades cluster (HyPl),
158: and the Sirius group (Si) have been marked. Distances between the
159: isodensity curves are also given in the plot.
160: }
161: \label{fig:contour}
162: \end{figure}
163:
164: We used the kinematical method from \cite{bensby2003, bensby2005}
165: to define a sample of Hercules stream stars. This method assumes
166: that a stellar population has a Gaussian velocity distribution and constitutes
167: a certain fraction of the stars in the solar neighbourhood.
168: Assuming that the solar neighbourhood is a sole mixture of the thin disk,
169: the thick disk, the Hercules stream, and the halo, it is then possible to
170: calculate the probabilities for individual stars (with known space velocities)
171: to belong to either of the populations. We selected Hercules
172: stream stars as those stars that have probabilities of belonging to
173: the Hercules stream that are at least as large as twice the probabilities of
174: belonging to any of the other populations.
175:
176: The \cite{nordstrom2004} catalogue contains kinematic
177: information for 13240 F and G dwarf stars in the solar neighbourhood.
178: Considering the full catalogue we are able to kinematically tag 12040 stars
179: as likely thin disk members, 438 as likely thick disk members, and 112 as
180: likely Hercules stream members. Fig.~\ref{fig:contour} shows a contour plot
181: of the distribution for all stars in the catalogue (thin solid lines),
182: and density contours for the thick disk (thick solid lines).
183:
184: The 60 Hercules stream stars in this study are
185: shown in a Toomre diagram in Fig.~\ref{fig:kinematics} together
186: with the 102 thin and thick disk stars from \cite{bensby2003, bensby2005}.
187: Our Hercules stream sample is well confined and forms a distinct kinematical
188: group. None of the thin and thick disk stars in \cite{bensby2003,bensby2005}
189: can be classified as Hercules stream stars.
190:
191: %==============================================================================
192: \section{Brief summary of observations, abundance analysis,
193: and age determinations}
194: \label{sec:observations}
195:
196: \begin{figure}
197: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=18 165 592 543,clip]{f2.eps}}
198: \caption{
199: Toomre diagram for the Hercules stream sample
200: (larger gray circles). Thin and thick disk stars
201: from \cite{bensby2003,bensby2005} are marked by open and black
202: smaller circles, respectively.
203: }
204: \label{fig:kinematics}
205: \end{figure}
206:
207:
208: High-resolution ($R\approx65\,000$), high-quality ($S/N\gtrsim250$)
209: echelle spectra were obtained for 60 F and G dwarfs by TB in Jan, Apr,
210: and Aug in 2006 with the MIKE spectrograph \citep{bernstein2003} on the
211: Magellan Clay 6.5\,m telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory in Chile.
212: Solar spectra were obtained during the runs by observing the asteroid Vesta
213: (in Jan), the Jovian moon Ganymede (in Apr), and the asteroid Ceres (in Aug).
214:
215: For the abundance analysis we used the Uppsala MARCS stellar model
216: atmospheres \citep{gustafsson1975,edvardsson1993,asplund1997}.
217: The chemical compositions of the models were scaled with metallicity
218: relative to the standard solar abundances as given in
219: \cite{asplundgrevessesauval2005}, but with $\alpha$-element
220: enhancements\footnote{The $\alpha$-element enhancement increases linearly
221: from $\rm [\alpha/Fe]=0$ at $\rm [Fe/H]=0$ up to $\rm [\alpha/Fe]=0.4$ at
222: $\rm [Fe/H]=-1$, and is then constant $\rm [\alpha/Fe]=0.4$ for lower
223: metallicities.} for stars with $\rm [Fe/H]<0$. To determine the effective
224: temperature and the microturbulence parameter we required
225: all Fe\,{\sc i} lines to yield the same abundance independent of lower
226: excitation potential and line strength, respectively.
227: To determine the surface gravities we utilised that our stars have accurate
228: Hipparcos parallaxes \citep{esa1997}. Final abundances were
229: normalised on a line-by-line basis with our solar values as reference and
230: then averaged for each element.
231:
232: Stellar ages were determined from the Yonsei-Yale (Y$^{2}$) $\alpha$-enhanced
233: isocrones \citep{kim2002,demarque2004} in the $\teff$-$M_{\rm V}$ plane.
234: Upper and lower limits on the ages were estimated from the error bars due
235: to an uncertainty of $\pm 70$\,K in $\teff$
236: and the uncertainty in $M_{\rm V}$ due to the error in the parallax
237: \citep[see][]{bensby2003}.
238:
239: %==============================================================================
240: \section{Results and discussion} \label{sec:results}
241:
242: \begin{figure*}
243: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=18 223 592 508,clip]{f3a.eps}
244: \includegraphics[bb=18 223 592 508,clip]{f3c.eps}}
245: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=18 165 592 501,clip]{f3b.eps}
246: \includegraphics[bb=18 165 592 501,clip]{f3d.eps}}
247:
248: \caption{
249: [Mg/Fe] and [Ba/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] (panels to the left) and
250: [Fe/Mg]\,-\,[Mg/H] and [Ba/Mg] vs. [Mg/H] (panels to the right).
251: Hercules stars are marked by larger gray circles.
252: The thin and thick disk stars from
253: \cite{bensby2003,bensby2005} are marked by open and black
254: smaller circles, respectively.
255: }
256: \label{fig:abundancetrends}
257: \end{figure*}
258:
259: Our abundance results are shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:abundancetrends}a-d.
260: While the [Mg/Fe] vs.~[Fe/H]
261: trends for the thin and thick disks are clearly separated
262: they do merge as $\rm [Fe/H] \approx0$ is reached.
263: The [Ba/Fe] vs.~[Fe/H] trend, on the other hand, keeps the two disks well
264: separated until $\rm [Fe/H] \approx0.1$.
265: The separation between the thin and thick disks is larger when
266: Mg is used as the reference element.
267:
268: The observed thick disk [Mg/Fe] vs.~[Fe/H] trend is due to
269: the different production sites of Mg and Fe in SN\,II and SN\,Ia, respectively,
270: operating at different time scales
271: \citep[see, e.g.,][]{mcwilliam1997}.
272:
273: The solar system abundance of Ba has been built up by two
274: different production mechanisms that work on different timescales;
275: the $r$-process which dominated at low metallicities ($\rm [Fe/H]\lesssim-1.5$)
276: and contributed $\sim20$\,\%, and the
277: $s$-process that dominated at higher metallicities and
278: contributed $\sim80$\,\% \citep{travaglio1999}.
279: The increase (or the ''bump") that can be seen in the [Ba/Fe]-[Fe/H] trend
280: for the thin disk is likely to be a signature of when the $s$-process
281: enrichment from AGB stars became significant \citep{travaglio1999}.
282: For other environments the mixture may be different, compare e.g.
283: the Ba and Eu trends in \cite{mashonkina2003}.
284: For the thick disk, the flat [Ba/Fe] trend
285: could indicate that the $s$-process did not play a significant r\^ole
286: in the Ba enrichment of the gas from which the thick disk formed
287: (and hence the lack of the ``bump").
288:
289: %==============================================================================
290: \subsection{Abundance bimodality?}
291:
292: A first impression is that most Hercules stream stars
293: follow the trends as outlined by the thick disk. In the
294: [Ba/Fe] vs.~[Fe/H] plot this is especially evident and even up to
295: metallicities as high as $\rm [Fe/H] \approx +0.1$. In the [Mg/Fe] vs.~[Fe/H]
296: plot the Hercules stars follow the thick disk trend up to
297: $\rm [Fe/H]\approx-0.2$ and may then show signs of a mixing between the
298: two disks for higher metallicities. The [Fe/Mg] and [Ba/Mg] trends with [Mg/H]
299: give similar results.
300:
301: Apart from one star, HIP\,44927, we do not find any Hercules stream
302: stars that deviate from the thin and thick disk abundance trends.
303: Recent observations have shown that bulge stars have
304: large $\alpha$-enhancements at solar and super-solar metallicities
305: \citep{fulbright2006astroph,zoccali2006}. This compares very well with what
306: we see for HIP~44927, indicating that we might have picked up a bulge
307: star in our Hercules sample. Its age $3.8^{+0.7}_{-0.4}$\,Gyr is, however,
308: inconsistent with the bulge being an old population. But there are
309: indications that the bulge could contain stars as young as a few hundred
310: million years \citep{gilmore2003}.
311:
312:
313: %==============================================================================
314: \subsection{Age bimodality?}
315:
316: \begin{figure}
317: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=18 165 592 520,clip]{f4.eps}}
318: \caption{Ages vs. [Fe/H] for the Hercules stream stars (larger gray circles).
319: Thin and thick disk stars from \cite{bensby2003,bensby2005} are
320: marked by open and black smaller circles, respectively. Error
321: bars show the upper and lower age estimates due to the
322: uncertainties in the $\teff$s and in the distances to the stars.
323: }
324: \label{fig:agefeh}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: In Fig.~\ref{fig:agefeh} we plot stellar ages versus [Fe/H]. At metallicities
328: below $\rm [Fe/H]=0$ it appears that the Hercules stream divides into two
329: (or maybe three) branches: one that follows the thick disk age
330: trend (the downward age-metallicity relation we see for the thick disk
331: trend was seen in \citealt{bensby_amr} and then verified
332: by \citealt{haywood2006} and \citealt{schuster2006});
333: one that follows the thin disk age trend; and a
334: few stars (4-5) that tend to have high ages of $\sim15$\,Gyr
335: in the interval $\rm -0.4\lesssim[Fe/H]\lesssim0$.
336: Once again, we see that the stars of the Hercules stream follow
337: the trends outlined by the stars with kinematics typical of the
338: thin and thick disks.
339: As the uncertainties in the age determinations are notoriously
340: difficult to estimate \citep[see e.g.][]{jorgensen2005},
341: and generally come out too small when using standard methods
342: one should be careful to make far fetched interpretations
343: about the few outliers.
344:
345: %==============================================================================
346: \subsection{The origin of the Hercules stream}
347: \label{sec:origin}
348:
349: Some Galactic streams may have origins due to minor mergers
350: \citep[e.g.][]{navarro2004}. Could this be the case for the
351: Hercules stream? Such a merging system must then have had chemical properties
352: similar to the present Galactic disks. Thus, such a merging galaxy must
353: have had chemical properties that depart considerably from
354: those of local dwarf galaxies \citep[cf., e.g.][]{venn2004} and would
355: presumably be more similar to a major spiral galaxy. There is no
356: observational evidence that such a substantial merger occured
357: in the Milky Way during the last 10\,Gyr \citep{gilmore2002}.
358: Instead, our results strongly suggest that the Hercules stream has a dynamical
359: origin, presumably due to the dynamical effects of the Galactic bar,
360: and it may consist of stars from the inner Galactic disks.
361:
362: Are we then tracing the inner thin disk or the inner thick disk?
363: As no detailed abundance data for the inner disks have been obtained
364: yet, only indirect evidence is available. The thick disk velocity
365: dispersion is about twice that of the thin disk, but its rotational
366: velocity is just $\sim80$\,\% of that of the thin disk.
367: According to the Toomre stability criterion
368: \citep[$Q\propto V_{\rm rot} \cdot \sigma_{\rm R}$;][]{toomre1964}
369: the thick disk should be slightly more stable than the thin disk
370: ($Q_{\rm thick\,disk}\approx1.6\cdot Q_{\rm thin\,disk}$) and less
371: disturbed by gravitational influences from the Galactic bar.
372: Since the inner thin disk is thought to have more evolved stellar populations,
373: as judged from its abundance and age gradients, the higher ages and
374: $\rm [\alpha/Fe]$ ratios of the Hercules stream seem consistent with an
375: inner thin disk origin. On the other hand, the abundance patterns are better
376: matched to the thick disk in general, and it is plausible that the thick
377: disk also has a metallicity gradient, which would then match the relative
378: number of high-metallicity stars in the stream.
379:
380: As the stars of the Hercules stream display the distinct abundance and age
381: trends of {\it both} the thin and thick disk stars, it is likely that
382: it actually is a mixture of the two disks. This is also suggested
383: by the Toomre stability criterion being similar for the two disk
384: components.
385: A preliminary investigation of the relationship between the ages and
386: abundance ratios for our stars in the Hercules stream
387: shows that they are correlated in a way expected for
388: an Hercules stream composed of Galactic disk stars
389: (see further Bensby et al. 2007, in prep.)
390:
391:
392: %==============================================================================
393: \section{Conclusion}
394:
395: The Hercules stream is
396: unique in the sense that it forms a well defined enhancement
397: in the velocity distribution of nearby stars.
398: However, large ranges in stellar ages and
399: elemental abundances indicate that it is not a distinct
400: stellar population. Instead, as the age and abundance trends
401: in the Hercules stream are similar to the trends in the thin and thick
402: disks, we conclude that the Hercules stream is a mixture of thin and thick disk
403: stars. This result is in concordance with models that suggest that the
404: kinematical properties of the Hercules stream are coupled to dynamical
405: interactions with the Galactic bar. Whether the Hercules stream stars
406: have a real inner disk origin or whether they are nearby stars whose
407: kinematics are an effect of the outer Lindlad resonance of the bar,
408: which may be situated near the solar
409: neighbourhood \citep{dehnen2000}, is unclear.
410: Further insights into this problem
411: could be gained by making comparisons to detailed abundance data from the
412: {\it in situ} inner Galactic thin and thick disks.
413: As such data currently are unavailable, we have initiated a study to
414: obtain them.
415:
416:
417: %==============================================================================
418: \acknowledgments
419:
420: This work was supported by the National Science
421: Foundation, grant AST-0448900, and a grant from the Swedish Research Council.
422: SF is a Royal Swedish Academy
423: of Sciences Research Fellow supported by a grant from the Knut and
424: Alice Wallenberg Foundation.
425:
426:
427: \begin{thebibliography}{44}
428: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
429:
430: \bibitem[{{Arifyanto} \& {Fuchs}(2006)}]{arifyanto2006}
431: {Arifyanto}, M.~I., \& {Fuchs}, B. 2006, \aap, 449, 533
432:
433: \bibitem[{{Asplund} {et~al.}(2005){Asplund}, {Grevesse}, \&
434: {Sauval}}]{asplundgrevessesauval2005}
435: {Asplund}, M., {Grevesse}, N., \& {Sauval}, A.~J. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 336:
436: Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 25
437:
438: \bibitem[{{Asplund} {et~al.}(1997){Asplund}, {Gustafsson}, {Kiselman}, \&
439: {Eriksson}}]{asplund1997}
440: {Asplund}, M., {Gustafsson}, B., {Kiselman}, D., \& {Eriksson}, K. 1997, \aap,
441: 318, 521
442:
443: \bibitem[{{Bensby} {et~al.}(2003){Bensby}, {Feltzing}, \& {Lundstr{\"
444: o}m}}]{bensby2003}
445: {Bensby}, T., {Feltzing}, S., \& {Lundstr{\" o}m}, I. 2003, \aap, 410, 527
446:
447: \bibitem[{{Bensby} {et~al.}(2004{\natexlab{a}}){Bensby}, {Feltzing}, \&
448: {Lundstr{\" o}m}}]{bensby_amr}
449: ---. 2004{\natexlab{a}}, \aap, 421, 969
450:
451: \bibitem[{{Bensby} {et~al.}(2004{\natexlab{b}}){Bensby}, {Feltzing}, \&
452: {Lundstr{\" o}m}}]{bensby2004}
453: ---. 2004{\natexlab{b}}, \aap, 415, 155
454:
455: \bibitem[{{Bensby} {et~al.}(2005){Bensby}, {Feltzing}, {Lundstr{\" o}m}, \&
456: {Ilyin}}]{bensby2005}
457: {Bensby}, T., {Feltzing}, S., {Lundstr{\" o}m}, I., \& {Ilyin}, I. 2005, \aap,
458: 433, 185
459:
460: \bibitem[{{Bensby} {et~al.}(2006){Bensby}, {Oey}, {Feltzing}, \&
461: {Gustafsson}}]{bensby2006mru}
462: {Bensby}, T., {Oey}, M.~S., {Feltzing}, S., \& {Gustafsson}, B. 2006, in The
463: Metal Rich Universe, Las Cancajos, La Palma, Spain, 12-16 June, 2006, Garik
464: Israelian and Georges Meynet (eds), Cambridge University Press, in press,
465: (astro--ph/0610754)
466:
467: \bibitem[{{Bernstein} {et~al.}(2003){Bernstein}, {Shectman}, {Gunnels},
468: {Mochnacki}, \& {Athey}}]{bernstein2003}
469: {Bernstein}, R., {Shectman}, S.~A., {Gunnels}, S.~M., {Mochnacki}, S., \&
470: {Athey}, A.~E. 2003, in Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4841, ed. M.~{Iye} \&
471: A.~F.~M. {Moorwood}, 1694--1704
472:
473: \bibitem[{{Dehnen}(1998)}]{dehnen1998a}
474: {Dehnen}, W. 1998, \aj, 115, 2384
475:
476: \bibitem[{{Dehnen}(1999)}]{dehnen1999}
477: ---. 1999, \apjl, 524, L35
478:
479: \bibitem[{{Dehnen}(2000)}]{dehnen2000}
480: ---. 2000, \aj, 119, 800
481:
482: \bibitem[{{Demarque} {et~al.}(2004){Demarque}, {Woo}, {Kim}, \&
483: {Yi}}]{demarque2004}
484: {Demarque}, P., {Woo}, J.-H., {Kim}, Y.-C., \& {Yi}, S.~K. 2004, \apjs, 155,
485: 667
486:
487: \bibitem[{{Ecuvillon} {et~al.}(2006){Ecuvillon}, {Israelian}, {Pont}, {Santos},
488: \& {Mayor}}]{ecuvillon2006astroph}
489: {Ecuvillon}, A., {Israelian}, G., {Pont}, F., {Santos}, N.~C., \& {Mayor}, M.
490: 2006, \aap, accepted, (astro-ph/0608669)
491:
492: \bibitem[{{Edvardsson} {et~al.}(1993){Edvardsson}, {Andersen}, {Gustafsson},
493: {Lambert}, {Nissen}, \& {Tomkin}}]{edvardsson1993}
494: {Edvardsson}, B., {Andersen}, J., {Gustafsson}, B., {Lambert}, D.~L., {Nissen},
495: P.~E., \& {Tomkin}, J. 1993, \aap, 275, 101
496:
497: \bibitem[{{ESA}(1997)}]{esa1997}
498: {ESA}. 1997, {The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues, ESA SP Series vol no: 1200,
499: Noordwijk, Netherlands}
500:
501: \bibitem[{{Famaey} {et~al.}(2005){Famaey}, {Jorissen}, {Luri}, {Mayor}, {Udry},
502: {Dejonghe}, \& {Turon}}]{famaey2005}
503: {Famaey}, B., {Jorissen}, A., {Luri}, X., {Mayor}, M., {Udry}, S., {Dejonghe},
504: H., \& {Turon}, C. 2005, \aap, 430, 165
505:
506: \bibitem[{{Feltzing} {et~al.}(2003){Feltzing}, {Bensby}, \& {Lundstr{\"
507: o}m}}]{feltzing2003}
508: {Feltzing}, S., {Bensby}, T., \& {Lundstr{\" o}m}, I. 2003, \aap, 397, L1
509:
510: \bibitem[{{Feltzing} {et~al.}(2007){Feltzing}, {Fohlman}, \&
511: {Bensby}}]{feltzing2006}
512: {Feltzing}, S., {Fohlman}, M., \& {Bensby}, T. 2007, \aap \,\,accepted
513:
514: \bibitem[{{Fuhrmann}(2004)}]{fuhrmann2004}
515: {Fuhrmann}, K. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 3
516:
517: \bibitem[{{Fulbright} {et~al.}(2006){Fulbright}, {McWilliam}, \&
518: {Rich}}]{fulbright2006astroph}
519: {Fulbright}, J.~P., {McWilliam}, A., \& {Rich}, R.~M. 2006, \aj, submitted,
520: (astro-ph/0609087)
521:
522: \bibitem[{{Fux}(2001)}]{fux2001}
523: {Fux}, R. 2001, \aap, 373, 511
524:
525: \bibitem[{{Gilmore} {et~al.}(2002){Gilmore}, {Wyse}, \& {Norris}}]{gilmore2002}
526: {Gilmore}, G., {Wyse}, R.F.G., \& {Norris}, J.E. 2002, \apjl, 574, L39
527:
528: \bibitem[{{Gilmore}(2003)}]{gilmore2003}
529: {Gilmore}, G. 2003, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference
530: Series, ed. V.~{Avila-Reese}, C.~{Firmani}, C.~S. {Frenk}, \& C.~{Allen},
531: 149--157
532:
533: \bibitem[{{Gustafsson} {et~al.}(1975){Gustafsson}, {Bell}, {Eriksson}, \&
534: {Nordlund}}]{gustafsson1975}
535: {Gustafsson}, B., {Bell}, R.~A., {Eriksson}, K., \& {Nordlund}, A. 1975, \aap,
536: 42, 407
537:
538: \bibitem[{{Haywood}(2006)}]{haywood2006}
539: {Haywood}, M. 2006, \mnras, 371, 1760
540:
541: \bibitem[{{Helmi} {et~al.}(2006){Helmi}, {Navarro}, {Nordstr{\"o}m},
542: {Holmberg}, {Abadi}, \& {Steinmetz}}]{helmi2006}
543: {Helmi}, A., {Navarro}, J.~F., {Nordstr{\"o}m}, B., {Holmberg}, J., {Abadi},
544: M.~G., \& {Steinmetz}, M. 2006, \mnras, 365, 1309
545:
546: \bibitem[{{J{\o}rgensen} \& {Lindegren}(2005)}]{jorgensen2005}
547: {J{\o}rgensen}, B.~R., \& {Lindegren}, L. 2005, \aap, 436, 127
548:
549: \bibitem[{{Kim} {et~al.}(2002){Kim}, {Demarque}, {Yi}, \&
550: {Alexander}}]{kim2002}
551: {Kim}, Y., {Demarque}, P., {Yi}, S.~K., \& {Alexander}, D.~R. 2002, \apjs, 143,
552: 499
553:
554: \bibitem[{{Mashonkina} {et~al.}(2003){Mashonkina}, {Gehren}, {Travaglio}, \&
555: {Borkova}}]{mashonkina2003}
556: {Mashonkina}, L., {Gehren}, T., {Travaglio}, C., \& {Borkova}, T. 2003, \aap,
557: 397, 275
558:
559: \bibitem[{{McWilliam}(1997)}]{mcwilliam1997}
560: {McWilliam}, A. 1997, \araa, 35, 503
561:
562: \bibitem[{{Mishenina} {et~al.}(2004){Mishenina}, {Soubiran}, {Kovtyukh}, \&
563: {Korotin}}]{mishenina2004}
564: {Mishenina}, T.~V., {Soubiran}, C., {Kovtyukh}, V.~V., \& {Korotin}, S.~A.
565: 2004, \aap, 418, 551
566:
567: \bibitem[{{Navarro} {et~al.}(2004){Navarro}, {Helmi}, \&
568: {Freeman}}]{navarro2004}
569: {Navarro}, J.~F., {Helmi}, A., \& {Freeman}, K.~C. 2004, \apjl, 601, L43
570:
571: \bibitem[{{Nordstr{\" o}m} {et~al.}(2004){Nordstr{\" o}m}, {Mayor}, {Andersen},
572: {Holmberg}, {Pont}, {J{\o}rgensen}, {Olsen}, {Udry}, \&
573: {Mowlavi}}]{nordstrom2004}
574: {Nordstr{\" o}m}, B., {Mayor}, M., {Andersen}, J., {Holmberg}, J., {Pont}, F.,
575: {J{\o}rgensen}, B.~R., {Olsen}, E.~H., {Udry}, S., \& {Mowlavi}, N. 2004,
576: \aap, 418, 989
577:
578: \bibitem[{{Raboud} {et~al.}(1998){Raboud}, {Grenon}, {Martinet}, {Fux}, \&
579: {Udry}}]{raboud1998}
580: {Raboud}, D., {Grenon}, M., {Martinet}, L., {Fux}, R., \& {Udry}, S. 1998,
581: \aap, 335, L61
582:
583: \bibitem[{{Schuster} {et~al.}(2006){Schuster}, {Moitinho}, {M{\'a}rquez},
584: {Parrao}, \& {Covarrubias}}]{schuster2006}
585: {Schuster}, W.~J., {Moitinho}, A., {M{\'a}rquez}, A., {Parrao}, L., \&
586: {Covarrubias}, E. 2006, \aap, 445, 939
587:
588: \bibitem[{{Skuljan} {et~al.}(1999){Skuljan}, {Hearnshaw}, \&
589: {Cottrell}}]{skuljan1999}
590: {Skuljan}, J., {Hearnshaw}, J.~B., \& {Cottrell}, P.~L. 1999, \mnras, 308, 731
591:
592: \bibitem[{{Soubiran} \& {Girard}(2005)}]{soubiran2005}
593: {Soubiran}, C., \& {Girard}, P. 2005, \aap, 438, 139
594:
595: \bibitem[{{Toomre}(1964)}]{toomre1964}
596: {Toomre}, A. 1964, \apj, 139, 1217
597:
598: \bibitem[{{Travaglio} {et~al.}(1999){Travaglio}, {Galli}, {Gallino}, {Busso},
599: {Ferrini}, \& {Straniero}}]{travaglio1999}
600: {Travaglio}, C., {Galli}, D., {Gallino}, R., {Busso}, M., {Ferrini}, F., \&
601: {Straniero}, O. 1999, \apj, 521, 691
602:
603: \bibitem[{{Venn} {et~al.}(2004){Venn}, {Irwin}, {Shetrone}, {Tout}, {Hill}, \&
604: {Tolstoy}}]{venn2004}
605: {Venn}, K.~A., {Irwin}, M., {Shetrone}, M.~D., {Tout}, C.~A., {Hill}, V., \&
606: {Tolstoy}, E. 2004, \aj, 128, 1177
607:
608: \bibitem[{{Zoccali} {et~al.}(2006){Zoccali}, {Lecureur}, {Barbuy}, {Hill},
609: {Renzini}, {Minniti}, {Momany}, {Gomez}, \& {Ortolani}}]{zoccali2006}
610: {Zoccali}, M., {Lecureur}, A., {Barbuy}, B., {Hill}, V., {Renzini}, A.,
611: {Minniti}, D., {Momany}, Y., {Gomez}, A., \& {Ortolani}, S. 2006, \aap, 457,
612: L1
613:
614: \end{thebibliography}
615:
616:
617: \end{document}
618:
619: