1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}
2:
3: \input{psfig.sty}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: %\vspace{0.8 in}
7:
8: \title{Is the Lack of Pulsations in Low Mass X-Ray Binaries due to
9: Comptonizing Coronae?}
10:
11: \author{
12: Ersin {G\"o\u{g}\"u\c{s}}\altaffilmark{1},
13: M. Ali Alpar\altaffilmark{1},
14: Marat Gilfanov\altaffilmark{2,3}
15: }
16:
17: \altaffiltext{1}{Sabanc{\i} University, Faculty of Engineering \& Natural
18: Sciences, Orhanl{\i}$-$Tuzla 34956 {\.I}stanbul, Turkey}
19: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institute f{\"u}r Astrophysik,
20: Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85740 Garching bei M{\"u}nchen, Germany}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences,
22: Profsoyuznaya 84/32, 117997 Moscow, Russia}
23:
24: %\authoremail{ersing@sabanciuniv.edu}
25:
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: The spin periods of the neutron stars in most Low Mass X-ray Binary
30: (LMXB) systems still remain undetected.
31: One of the models to explain the absence of coherent pulsations has been
32: the suppression of the beamed signal by Compton
33: scattering of X-ray photons by electrons in a surrounding corona.
34: We point out that simultaneously with wiping out the pulsation signal,
35: such a corona will upscatter (pulsating or not) X-ray emission
36: originating at and/or near the surface of the neutron star leading to
37: appearance of a hard tail of Comptonized radiation in the source
38: spectrum. We analyze the hard X-ray spectra of a selected set of LMXBs
39: and demonstrate that the optical depth of the corona is not likely to be
40: large enough to cause the pulsations to disappear.
41:
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: \keywords{accretion, neutron star physics -- X-rays: Binaries --
45: stars: individual (GX 9+1), (GX 9+9), (Sco X-1)}
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49:
50: Low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) are binary systems that contain a
51: neutron star or a black hole as the primary object, and a low-mass star
52: (typically M $<$ 2 M$_{\rm Sun}$) as the mass-donating companion. Mass
53: transfer from the companion takes place via Roche lobe overflow.
54:
55: In the case of neutron star LMXBs, the neutron star spin period would be
56: expected to be observable if the magnetic fields of the star can channel
57: the accretion to yield beamed X-ray emission, and if the beamed signal
58: can escape the system. The fact that almost none of the LMXBs exhibit
59: pulsations corresponding to the neutron star spin period has remained a
60: puzzle since the discovery of neutron star LMXBs. The proposal that the
61: millisecond radio pulsars are evolutionary
62: descendants of the low mass X-ray binaries (Alpar et al. 1982; Radhakrishnan
63: \& Srinivasan, 1983) highlighted the issue and led to a search for millisecond
64: X-ray pulsars. Millisecond spin periods were also indicated in the initial
65: beat frequency model for horizontal branch quasi periodic luminosity
66: oscillations (Alpar \& Shaham 1985).
67: More recently, kilohertz QPO branches also gave an
68: indication of millisecond rotation
69: periods through a beat frequency model interpretation of the difference between
70: two "kilohertz" frequency bands. The burst oscillations observed from these
71: sources seem to have about the difference frequency or half the difference
72: frequency. While a consistent interpretation of kilohertz, burst and horizontal
73: branch oscillations is not available yet, there are enough correlations and
74: systematics (van der Klis 2000) at high frequency bands that, assuming the
75: accretion flow
76: and the neutron star are not far from rotational equilibrium, all these high
77: frequency QPO observations also point at rapid neutron star spin, with periods
78: in the millisecond range.
79:
80: Millisecond X-ray pulsars were discovered relatively recently (Wijnands \&
81: van der Klis 1998),
82: confirming the evolutionary hypothesis. These millisecond X-ray pulsars
83: (or, indeed , pulsars of any coherent spin period) remain a minority
84: among the LMXBs.
85: Almost 90\% of LMXBs do not display coherent pulsations in their persistent
86: phase. So the question remains as to why these few among the LMXBs display
87: their spin period.
88:
89: The millisecond radio pulsars are believed to have spun up to these exremely
90: short spin periods by accretion. To have millisecond equilibrium periods at
91: sub-Eddington accretion rates the magnetic field strength of the compact
92: object should be relatively weak (B $\sim$ 10$^9$ G). Nevertheless, a magnetic
93: field of this magnitude may be able to channel the accretion flow and lead
94: to beamed X-ray radiation. The inner radius of the accretion disk, roughly the
95: Alfven radius, is expected to be a few stellar radii in most LMXBs. This
96: leaves a possibility of a magnetosphere with ample options for anisotropy in
97: accretion and beaming for the X-ray radiation.
98:
99: The absence of coherent pulsations in the persistent emission of neutron star
100: LMXBs is usually attributed to several potential causes as laid out already
101: in the first papers on the evolution of millisecond radio pulsars
102: (Alpar et al. 1982, Alpar and Shaham 1985, Lamb et al 1985):
103: {\it (i)} The magnetic field is so weak that accreting matter cannot be
104: channeled onto the magnetic poles, {\it (ii)} The pulsar's periodic signal
105: is attenuated by gravitational lensing (e.g. Meszaros, Riffert \& Berthiaume
106: 1988), {\it (iii)} Beamed radiation emerging from the neutron star's magnetic
107: polar caps is "wiped out" by electron scattering (Brainerd \& Lamb 1987;
108: Kylafis \& Klimis 1987; Wang \& Schlickeiser 1987; Bussard et al. 1988).
109: It is important to note the distinction between isotropic luminosity
110: oscillations and modulation in the observed signal due to a rotating beam.
111: Although in both cases scatterings will suppress pulsations as observed by a
112: distant observer, the physics of suppression is different
113: (e.g. Miller, Lamb, \& Psaltis 1998). In the case of isotropic luminosity
114: oscillations, the degree of suppression of pulsations depends on the ratio
115: of the light travel time in the scattering media (which depends on its optical
116: depth and size) to the pulsation period. In the case of modulations due to
117: rotating beamed radiation, the optical depth of $\sim 1$ is sufficient to
118: destroy the beaming and to wipe out pulsations. While the luminosity
119: oscillation may be relevant to QPO phenomena in X-ray binaries, it is the
120: beaming oscillations, that are responsible for coherent pulsations observed
121: from X-ray pulsars. The latter case is critically investigated in the paper.
122:
123: In the commonly accepted picture of sub-Eddington accretion onto a
124: neutron star, two parts of the accretion flow are distinguished - the
125: Keplerian accretion disk and the boundary/spreading layer on the
126: surface of the neutron star (Sunyaev \& Shakura 1986).
127: The boundary/spreading layer is present in neutron stars with
128: magnetic field not strong enough to stop the acretion disk beyond a
129: magnetosphere. In the boundary/spreading layer the
130: accreting matter decelerates from the Keplerian velocity of the inner
131: boundary of the accretion disk to the rotation velocity of the neutron star
132: and settles onto its surface. Comparable fractions of energy are emitted
133: in the disk and in the boundary layer (Sibgatullin \& Sunyaev 2000).
134: Correspondingly, there are two components in the spectra of neutron
135: star binaries, associated with these two parts of the
136: accretion flow. At sufficiently high mass accretion rate $\dot{\rm M}>$ 0.1
137: $\dot{\rm M}_{\rm Edd}$, corresponding to the high spectral state of atoll and
138: Z-sources, the boundary layer and accretion disk are both radiating in
139: the optically thick regime with kT$\sim$1$-$2 keV. It is expected on
140: theoretical grounds and demonstrated observationally that the
141: boundary layer component has higher temperature than the accretion
142: disk (Gilfanov, Revnivtsev \& Molkov 2003).
143:
144: A corona around the neutron star, responsible for wiping out the pulsating
145: signal will upscatter the relatively soft emission from the neutron star
146: surface (pulsating or not). Depending on the geometry, some fraction of
147: the accretion disk emission will also be upscattered.
148: This will lead to appearance of the hard tail of Comptonized emission
149: in the spectrum. Transient hard tails are indeed observed in the
150: spectra of neutron star LMXBs and are sometimes attributed to the
151: Comptonization (see e.g., Di Salvo et al. [2000]). However, these hard
152: tails are not always present.
153:
154: Hard X-ray upper limits (or detected flux) can be used to constrain
155: parameters of the putative corona around the neutron stars. Indeed, if the
156: spectrum and intensity of the neutron star surface emission are given, the
157: flux in a high energy band (e.g. 30$-$60 keV) will depend uniquely on the
158: temperature and optical depth of the corona. The critical parameter in the
159: "wiping out" scenario is, of course, the optical depth. One can consider a
160: range of plausible temperatures and constrain the optical depth of the corona
161: as a function of its (unknown) temperature. If, on the other hand, the
162: hard tail is significantly detected, the position of its high energy
163: cut-off can help to determine the temperature and more accurately
164: constrain the optical depth.
165:
166: In this study, we perform broadband X-ray spectral investigations of the
167: three LMXBs, GX 9+1, GX 9+9 and Sco X-1 to constrain their hard X-ray spectral
168: characteristics using a Comptonization model. We estimate the spectrum and flux of
169: the seed photons for Comptonization (i.e. neutron star surface spectrum) by
170: applying a two-temperature black body model to the observed spectrum below
171: $\sim$20 keV. In this simplified model, the harder blackbody represents
172: emission of the surface of the neutron star (boundary/spreading layer).
173: The softer blackbody is a crude approximation to the emission of the accretion
174: disk, ignoring the temperature distribution in the disk and the effect of
175: scatterings. The Comptonization model is mainly characterized with the
176: usual two parameters, the electron scattering optical thickness $\tau$ and
177: the electron temperature kT$_{\rm e}$. Values of $\tau$ $\gtrsim$ 1 would
178: destroy the beamed radiation from the surface of the neutron star.
179: We can, therefore, check the validity of the electron
180: scattering scenario for the absence of coherent pulsations from these systems
181: by using the upper limits to hard X$-$ray emission to obtain upper limits
182: of $\tau$ for a range of electron temperatures and conclude whether
183: or not the optical depth of a corona is large enough to smear out the
184: beamed radiation from the neutron star.
185: In the following section we describe the data
186: used in this study. We present our spectral investigations in \S 3.
187: The results are presented in \S 4, discussion and conclusions in \S 5.
188:
189:
190: \section{Observations and Data Extraction}
191:
192: %\clearpage
193: \begin{table}
194: \begin{center}
195:
196: \caption{Log of RXTE observations.
197: \label{tbl:rxte_data}}
198: \vspace{0.2cm}
199: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
200: \hline
201: \hline
202: Source & ObsID & Date & Exp (ks) \\
203: \hline
204: {$\rm{GX 9+1}$} & 20064-01-01-00 & 10/02/1997 & 11.8 \\
205: {$\rm{GX 9+9}$} & 10072-04-02-00 & 16/10/1996 & 10.1 \\
206: {$\rm{Sco X-1}$} & 20053-01-01-05 & 23/04/1997 & 15.1 \\
207: \hline
208: \hline
209: \end{tabular}
210:
211: \end{center}
212: \end{table}
213: %\clearpage
214:
215: We used archival Rossi X$-$ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) pointing
216: observations of GX 9+1, GX 9+9 and Sco X$-$1. These sources are selected
217: to reflect broad characteristics of LMXBs. GX 9+1 and GX 9+9 are known
218: as atoll sources and their X-ray intensities are in the range of low (0.1
219: L$_{\rm Edd}$) to intermediate (0.4 L$_{\rm Edd}$) levels.
220: Sco X-1 is a Z source which is the brightest X-ray emitting system among
221: LMXBs ($\gtrsim$ L$_{\rm Edd}$). In Table 1 we list the
222: details of the RXTE pointed observations.
223:
224: RXTE consists of two main instruments. The Proportional Counter
225: Array (PCA) is an array of five nearly identical xenon Proportional
226: Counter Units (PCUs), which are sensitive to photon energies between
227: 2$-$60 keV. Each detector unit has a collecting area of 1300 cm$^2$ and
228: energy resolution of 18\% at 6 keV (Jahoda et al. 2006).
229: The High-Energy X-Ray Timing Experiment (HEXTE) consists of two
230: clusters of NaI/CsI scintillation detectors which are sensitive to
231: photons of energies between 15 and 250 keV. The energy resolution
232: of HEXTE detectors is 15\% at 60 keV (Rothschild et al. 1998).
233:
234: We extracted the PCA spectra using Standard2 data (129 channels accumulated
235: every 16 s) collected from all three layers of all five PCUs.
236: In selecting data we required the Earth elevation angle with respect to the
237: spacecraft to be greater than 10$^\circ$ and the time to the nearest
238: South Atlantic
239: Anomaly passage to be more than 30 minutes. A background spectrum was
240: generated using the bright source background models, provided by the PCA
241: instrument team and pcabackest, which is an HEASOFT utility. The detector
242: dead time correction was applied for both the PCA and HEXTE spectra due to very
243: bright X-ray output of the sources selected.
244: We performed X-ray spectral modeling using XSPEC version 11.3.1 (Arnaud 1996).
245: We added a 1\% systematic error to the statistical error of each PCA spectral
246: channel to account for the detector response uncertainties.
247:
248:
249: \section{Spectral Analysis}
250:
251: We initially modeled the PCA spectrum only (in 3$-$20 keV) to determine the
252: spectral characteristics of these sources at low X-ray energies. The hydrogen
253: column densities (N$_{\rm H}$) were fixed at the interstellar average values
254: in the direction of each source (Dickey \& Lockman, 1990).
255: The interstellar N$_{\rm H}$ values are
256: 9$\times$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, 2$\times$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, and
257: 1.5$\times$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ for GX 9+1, GX 9+9, and Sco X-1, respectively.
258:
259: The X-ray spectrum of GX 9+1 is well fit with a sum of two blackbody functions.
260: The blackbody temperatures are 1.96$\pm$0.02 keV and 1.08$\pm$0.02 keV.
261: The emission radius of the higher temperature blackbody is 7.8$\pm$0.4 km,
262: while the radius of the lower temperature blackbody is 22.8$\pm$0.7 km
263: (assuming a distance of 10 kpc). We take the former blackbody component
264: as the emission originating from nearby the neutron star surface.
265: Note that these radii may not represent exact emission areas due to effect
266: of scattering and orbital inclination.
267: The unabsorbed 2$-$20 keV flux values of the blackbody components are
268: 9.14$\times$10$^{-9}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and
269: 6.46$\times$10$^{-9}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, respectively.
270:
271: In case of GX 9+9 spectral fitting, a broad spectral line was required to
272: adequately fit the spectrum, as well as two blackbodies.
273: The blackbody temperatures are 2.02$\pm$0.06 keV and 0.88$\pm$0.02 keV, and
274: the radii of corresponding emitting regions are 3.9$\pm$0.2 km and
275: 21.6$\pm$0.9 km (assuming a source distance of 10 kpc).
276: The centroid energy of the broad line feature was fixed at 6.4 keV (that is,
277: the rest frame energy of cold iron). We found a line width of 1.05$\pm$0.03
278: keV and the equivalent width of 240$\pm$22 eV.
279: Similar to the case in GX 9+1, we take the 2.02 keV blackbody as emitting from
280: on or near the neutron star surface. We estimate the unabsorbed 2$-$20 keV
281: flux values as 2.65$\times$10$^{-9}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and
282: 1.96$\times$10$^{-9}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for the harder and softer
283: blackbody components, respectively.
284:
285: As for Sco X-1, the sum of two blackbody components and
286: a broad line feature yields a suitable fit to the X-ray spectrum. The
287: blackbody temperatures are 2.27$\pm$0.01 keV and 0.78$\pm$0.01 keV.
288: The radii of emitting regions are 5.3$\pm$0.3 km and 54.1$\pm$1.5 km
289: (using the distance estimate of 2.8 kpc [Bradshaw, Fomalont \& Geldzahler
290: 1999]). The width of the line feature (the centroid fixed at 6.4 keV) is
291: 1.15$\pm$0.1 keV and the equivalent width is 848$\pm$9 eV. The unabsorbed
292: fluxes in the 2$-$20 keV range are estimated as
293: 1.13$\times$10$^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and 1.05$\times$10$^{-7}$
294: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for the harder and softer blackbody components,
295: respectively.
296:
297: For each source, we then modeled the PCA (3$-$20 keV) and HEXTE (15$-$200 keV)
298: spectra simultaneously as follows.
299: We fixed the spectral parameters of the low energy portion on
300: their above determined values and added an extra Comptonized
301: component (COMPPS model in XSPEC, spherical geometry [Poutanen \&
302: Svensson 1996]). The spectrum and normalization of the seed photons for the
303: Comptonization were fixed at the parameters of the harder black body
304: component, representing the emission originating on or near the
305: surface of the neutron star. The only two remaining parameters of the
306: Comptonization model are the electron temperature, kT$_{\rm e}$ and optical
307: depth, $\tau$ in the Comptonization region. For a given value of the
308: temperature, the
309: upper limit on the optical depth can be computed such that the upper
310: limits on the hard X-ray flux (30$-$200 keV) are satisfied. Thus
311: temperature dependent optical depth upper limits can be obtained in the
312: temperature range of interest.
313:
314: %\clearpage
315: \begin{figure}
316: \vspace{0.0in}
317: \centerline{
318: \plotone{f1.eps}}
319: \vspace{0.30in}
320: \caption{The broadband X-ray spectrum of GX 9+1 as seen with the RXTE/PCA
321: and HEXTE. The upper limits at high energies are at 2$\sigma$ level. The solid
322: curves are the two blackbodies that fit the PCA spectrum. The illustrative
323: Comptonization curves obtained with the electron cloud temperatures,
324: kT$_{{\rm e}}$=30 keV (dashed) and kT$_{{\rm e}}$=60 keV (dotted),
325: both using $\tau$=1 (lower curves) and $\tau$=3 (upper curves).
326: The higher temperature black body component, representing the neutron star
327: surface emission was used as the seed for Comptonization.}
328: \vspace{11pt}
329: \end{figure}
330: %\clearpage
331:
332: In Figure 1 we present the observed broadband X-ray spectrum of GX 9+1
333: with the sum of two blackbody components (solid line) and 2$\sigma$ upper
334: limits to the hard X-ray emission. Also in Figure 1, we illustrate some
335: representative Comptonization spectra (obtained using COMPPS).
336: While performing the simultaneous fit, we fixed the electron temperature of
337: the Comptonizing cloud (kT$_{{\rm e}}$) at 11 pre-selected values ranging
338: from 10 to 100 keV and increasing by an increment of 10 keV, with an additional
339: upper limit at kT$_{{\rm e}}$=15 keV to better understand the trend at low
340: electron temperatures. We determined
341: the upper limits for the electron scattering optical depths ($\tau$)
342: of the assumed Comptonizing corona at 95\% confidence level.
343:
344:
345:
346: \section{Results}
347:
348: We present the 2$\sigma$ upper limit values for Compton scattering optical
349: depth ($\tau$) as a function of selected temperatures of scattering
350: electron cloud (kT$_{\rm e}$) of GX 9+1 in Figure 2. We estimate the electron
351: scattering optical depth, $\tau$ $\sim$ 0.23 even at the lowest scattering
352: corona temperature considered (i.e., kT$_{\rm e}$ = 10 keV). At higher electron
353: temperatures the upper limit to the optical depth rapidly decreases.
354: This strongly indicates that for GX 9+1 the assumed corona is not optically
355: thick enough to significantly alter the nature of seed photons
356: originating from near the stellar surface via Compton scattering.
357:
358: %\clearpage
359: \begin{figure}[h]
360: \vspace{0.0in}
361: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2.eps,width=3.0in}}
362: \vspace{0.30in}
363: \caption{Plot of the estimated 2$\sigma$ upper limits for the optical depth as
364: a function of the temperature of the electron cloud in GX 9+1.}
365: %\vspace{11pt}
366: \end{figure}
367: %\clearpage
368:
369: As an independent check, we have followed the same line of analysis
370: but used a different RXTE pointing observation of GX 9+1
371: (Observation ID: 30042-05-02-00 performed on 27 September 1998 with an
372: exposure time of $\sim$7.4 ks). We obtain a similar kT$_{\rm e}$$-$$\tau$
373: trend as seen in Figure 2.
374:
375: %\clearpage
376: \begin{figure}[h]
377: \vspace{0.0in}
378: \centerline{\psfig{file=f3.eps,width=3.0in}}
379: \vspace{0.30in}
380: \caption{Plot of the estimated 2$\sigma$ upper limits for the optical depth as
381: a function of the temperature of the electron cloud in GX 9+9.}
382: %\vspace{11pt}
383: \end{figure}
384: %\clearpage
385:
386: In Figure 3, we show the optical depth upper limits as a function of assumed
387: kT$_{\rm e}$ around GX 9+9. We find that the upper limits to the
388: scattering optical
389: depth in this source are higher compared to that in GX9+1 at the lowest assumed
390: electron corona temperature. Similar to the case in GX 9+1, the upper limits
391: to the optical depth fall down rapidly as the assumed electron cloud temperature
392: increases. We find that the optical depth of the assumed corona
393: around GX 9+9 does not seem to be sufficient to suppress any beaming present
394: in the incoming soft X-ray radiation.
395:
396: Finally in Figure 4, we present the upper limits to $\tau$ as a function of
397: kT$_{\rm e}$ in Sco X-1. The overall trend is very similar to those in both
398: aforementioned sources. It is noteworthy here that the 2$\sigma$ upper limit
399: to the optical depth for the lowest electron cloud temperature of 10 keV
400: is almost 1.1. Such a degree of optical thickness may cause a significant
401: change on the properties of the incident radiation. Nevertheless, at
402: electron cloud temperatures kT$_{\rm e}$ $\gtrsim$ 15 keV
403: the scattering optical depth upper limits drops down to about 0.6. Thus,
404: a possible corona around Sco X-1, if it permanently exists, is not optically
405: thick enough for electron scattering to efficiently play an
406: important role in changing the beaming of soft X-rays emitted near the
407: neutron star, unless the electron temperature is less than $\sim$10$-$15 keV.
408:
409: %\clearpage
410: \begin{figure}[h]
411: \vspace{0.0in}
412: \centerline{\psfig{file=f4.eps,width=3.0in}}
413: \vspace{0.30in}
414: \caption{Plot of the estimated 2$\sigma$ upper limits for the optical depth as
415: a function of the temperature of the electron cloud in Sco X-1.}
416: %\vspace{11pt}
417: \end{figure}
418: %\clearpage
419:
420: As in the case of GX 9+1, we performed the optical depth estimation procedure
421: using another RXTE observation of Sco X-1 as well.
422: (Observation ID: 10061-01-03-00
423: performed on 2 January 1998 for $\sim$5.5 ks).
424: We find that the 2$\sigma$ upper limit to the optical depth corresponding to
425: a kT$_{\rm e}$ of 10 keV as 0.96 and $\tau$ values follow a similar trend for
426: kT$_{\rm e}$ as was the case in Figure 4.
427:
428:
429:
430: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
431:
432: \subsection{Other LMXBs}
433:
434: Among the LMXBs there are six Z sources, including Sco X-1, which have hard
435: X-ray tails in their spectra, though only episodically
436: (GX 5-1: Asai et al. 1994, Paizis et al. 2005;
437: Cyg X-2: Frontera et al. 1998; Di Salvo et al. 2002;
438: GX 17+2: Di Salvo et al. 2000, Farinelli et al. 2005;
439: Sco X-1: D'Amico et al. 2001; GX 349+2: Di Salvo et al. 2001;
440: Cir X-1: Iaria et al. 2001). In all these reported hard tail cases, the hard
441: X-ray spectral component is modelled with a power law (i.e., F(E) $\propto$
442: E$^{-\gamma}$ whose index ranges between -1 and 3.3. The transient appearance
443: of the hard X-ray tail in these sources is not correlated with the position
444: of the source radiation properties in the color-color diagram (except for
445: GX 17+2, Di Salvo et al. 2000, but also see Farinelli et al. 2005).
446:
447: For Sco X-1, the episodic hard X-ray spectral tail was detected only in
448: 5 RXTE pointings and the spectra were fitted with a power law of
449: indices ranging from -0.7$\pm$0.7 to 2.4$\pm$0.3 (D'Amico et al. 2001).
450: The 30$-$200 keV fluxes of these 5 observations range between
451: 8.9$\times$10$^{-10}$ and 2.1$\times$10$^{-9}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, while
452: we estimate the 30$-$200 keV flux for the RXTE pointing we investigate here as
453: 4.2$\times$10$^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
454: If there indeed exists a Compton scattering
455: cloud around the neutron star and it is the cause of the episodic hard X-ray
456: emission, then it may be a possible scenario for suppressing the beaming and
457: pulsed signals. However, such an explanation would work only during the epochs
458: with hard tails. For the rest of the time there are only upper limits
459: for the optical depth, which are far below the regime of efficient scattering,
460: indicating that the scattering corona is not likely to be thick enough to
461: yield the suppression of the pulses. One is then left still needing a reason
462: other than Comptonization to explain why coherent pulses are not observed.
463:
464:
465: \subsection{Comptonization Models for the Accreting Millisecond Pulsars}
466:
467: There are now seven known millisecond X-ray pulsars.
468: All of them have spectra
469: with hard X-ray components which are fit well with Comptonization models.
470: For the source XTE J1751-305, Gierlinski and Poutanen (2005)
471: employ seed photons at the temperature $\sim $0.5 keV of the soft blackbody
472: spectral component observed.
473: With the COMPPS model of Comptonization they find kT$_e$ = 29$\pm$4 keV
474: and $\tau$ = 1.93$\pm$0.23. If the seed photon temperature is treated
475: as a free parameter, the COMPPS model gives kT$_e$ = 36$\pm$3 keV
476: and $\tau$ = 1.47$\pm$0.26. The other Comptonization models tried by
477: Gierlinski and Poutanen (2005) do not constrain the optical depth $\tau$
478: and yield electron temperatures in the range 22-42 keV.
479: For SAX 1808.4$-$3658,
480: application of the COMPPS model with seed photon temperature $\sim$0.65 keV
481: from the soft blackbody spectral component gives kT$_e$ = 43$\pm$9 keV and
482: $\tau$ = 2.7$\pm$0.4 (Gierlinski, Done and Barret 2002). They have also
483: found that the Comptonized spectral component does itself pulsate.
484: For XTE J1807$-$294, Falanga et al. (2005a) performed a broadband spectral
485: analysis using XMM-Newton, RXTE and INTEGRAL observations. They find
486: kT$_e$ = 37$^{+28}_{-10}$ keV and $\tau$ = 1.7$^{+0.5}_{-0.8}$ using
487: COMPPS with seed photon temperature of 0.75 keV. The hard X-ray spectrum of
488: IGR J00291+5934 was
489: adequately modelled with a different Comptonization model (COMPST, Sunyaev
490: \& Titarchuk 1980) and it was found that kT$_e$ = 25$^{+21}_{-7}$ keV and
491: $\tau$ = 3.6$^{+1.0}_{-1.3}$ (Shaw et al. 2005). Falanga et al. (2005b) found
492: significant pulsations up to $\sim$150 keV in IGR J00291+5934, indicating
493: phase variations of the Comptonized component. Therefore, the geometry of the
494: Comptonizing region in these sources could be different than that in
495: non-pulsing neutron star LMXBs
496:
497: Krauss \& Chakrabarty (2006) have carried out a systematic X-ray spectral
498: analysis of RXTE data of three millisecond X-ray pulsars and three sources
499: that display no pulsations but burst oscillations. They have modeled the PCA
500: and HEXTE spectra using absorbed blackbody plus Comptonization (COMPTT in
501: XSPEC, Titarchuk [1994]) models. They find optical depths in the range of
502: 2$-$5 and plasma temperatures ranging from $\sim$20 keV to 50 keV. They find
503: no distinguishing spectral properties between the coherently pulsing and
504: non-pulsing sources. Moreover, they also find degeneracy between the estimated
505: optical depths and plasma temperatures. Based on these issues, they question
506: the validity of the scattering scenario for the lack of pulsations.
507:
508:
509: \subsection{Conclusions}
510:
511: We revisit the Compton scattering scenario suggested earlier to
512: explain lack of pulsations in the majority of LMXBs. We point out that
513: simultaneously wiping out the pulsating signal, such a corona
514: would upscatter X-rays orginating from the neutron star surface
515: leading to appearance of a hard tail of Comptonized radiation in the
516: source spectrum. We utilize archival data of RXTE observations of 3
517: representative LMXBs (GX9+9, GX9+1 and Sco X-1) covering the full
518: range of atoll/Z phenomenology. Based on the upper limits on the hard
519: X-ray emission in the 30-200 keV energy domain and a simple but robust
520: method to determine the neutron star surface emission we demonstrate
521: that the optical depth of such a corona does not exceed $\tau\la
522: 0.2-0.5$, unless the electron temperature is very
523: low, $kT_e\la 20-30$ keV. Such small values of the optical depth are
524: by far insufficient to suppress the pulsations.
525: We therefore conclude that lack of coherent pulsations can not be
526: attributed to the electron scatterings in the corona, at
527: least in the present three sources, and possibly in other LMXBs to the
528: extent that these sources are typical. A more likely cause of the lack
529: of pulsations is the absence or weakness of beaming of the X-ray
530: radiation emerging from the neutron star surface, caused, for example,
531: by the weakness of the magnetic field in high $\dot{M}$ sources. In
532: addition, the bending of X-rays in the gravitational field of the
533: compact object may play some role (Meszaros, Riffert \& Berthiaume 1988,
534: {\"O}zel 2007, in preparation). Regarding the accreting millisecond X-ray
535: pulsars, which exhihit pulsations in spite of evidence for Comptonization
536: with $\tau$ $>$ 1, we note that the geometry of the Comptonization region must
537: be different in these sources, e.g., localized near the neutron star polar
538: cap, as suggested by the fact that the Comptonized spectral component in
539: these sources itself pulsates.
540:
541:
542: \acknowledgments
543:
544: We thank Feryal {\"O}zel and Dimitrios Psaltis for helpful discussions, and
545: Rudy Wijnands for providing the database of accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars.
546: M.A.A. and E.G. acknowledge partial support from the Turkish Academy of
547: Sciences, for E.G. through grant E.G/T{\"U}BA$-$GEB{\.I}P/2004$-$11.
548:
549:
550: \begin{thebibliography}{}
551:
552: \bibitem[alpar 1982]{alpar82} Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. F., Ruderman, M. A.
553: \& Shaham, J. 1982, Nature, 300, 728
554: \bibitem[alpar 1985]{aplar85} Alpar, M. A. \& Shaham, J. 1985, Nature, 316, 239
555: \bibitem[arnaud 96]{arv96} Arnaud, K.A., 1996, ADASS V, eds. Jacoby G.
556: \& Barnes J., p17, ASP Conf. Series, 101
557: \bibitem[asai 1994]{asai94} Asai, K., Dotani, T., Mitsuda, K., et al. 1994,
558: PASJ, 46, 479
559: \bibitem[barret 2002]{bar02} Barret, D. \& Olive, J. F. 2002, ApJ, 576, 391
560: \bibitem[barshaw 1999]{bra99} Bradshaw, C. F., Fomalont, E. B., \& Geldzahler,
561: B. J. 1999, ApJ, 512, L121
562: \bibitem[brainerd 1987]{brainerd87} Brainerd, J. \& Lamb, F. K., 1987, ApJ,
563: 317, 33
564: \bibitem[bussard 1988]{bus88} Bussard, R. W., Weisskopf, M. C., Elsner, R. F.,
565: \& Shibazaki, N. 1988, ApJ, 327, 284
566: \bibitem[damico 2001]{dia01} D'Amico, F., Heindl, W. A., Rothschild, R. E.
567: \& Gruber, D. E. 2001, ApJ, 547, L147
568: \bibitem[dickey 1990]{dic90}
569: Dickey \& Lockman, 1990, ARAA. 28, 215
570: \bibitem[disalvo 2000]{disalvo00}
571: Di Salvo, T., Stella, L., Robba, N. R., et al. 2000, ApJ, 544, L119
572: \bibitem[disalvo 2001]{disalvo01}
573: Di Salvo, T., Robba, N. R., Iaria, R., et al. 2001, ApJ, 554, 49
574: \bibitem[disalvo 2002]{disalvo02}
575: Di Salvo, T., Farinelli, R., Burderi, L., et al. 2002, A \& A, 386, 535
576: \bibitem[falanga 2005]{fal05}
577: Falanga, M. et al. 2005, A \& A, 436, 647
578: \bibitem[farinelli 2005]{far05}
579: Farinelli, R. et al. 2005, A \& A, 434, 25
580: \bibitem[frontera 1998]{fron98}
581: Frontera, F. et al. 1998, The Active X-ray Sky, eds. L. Scarsi, H. Bradt,
582: P. Giommi, \& F. Fiore, Nuclear Physics, Proc. Suppl. 69/1-3, 286
583: \bibitem[gier 02]{gier02}
584: Gierlinski, M. \& Done, C. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 47
585: \bibitem[gbd 2002]{gbd02}
586: Gierlinski, M., Done, C., \& Barret, D. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 141
587: \bibitem[gp 2005]{gp05}
588: Gierlinski, M. \& Poutanen, J. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1261
589: \bibitem[jahoda 1996]{jah96}
590: Gilfanov, M., Revnivtsev, M. \& Molkov, S. 2003, A\&A, 410,217
591: \bibitem[gil 2003]{gil03}
592: Jahoda, K. et al. 2006, ApJS, 163, 401
593: \bibitem[kylafis 1987]{kylafis87}
594: Kylafis, N. D. \& Klimis, G. S., 1987, ApJ, 323, 678
595: \bibitem[krauss 2006]{krauss06}
596: Krauss, M. I. \& Chakrabarty, D., 2006, In proc. of "A life with stars",
597: eds. L. Kaper, M. van der Klis, and R. Wijers, Elsevier
598: \bibitem[lamb 1985]{lamb85}
599: Lamb, F. K., Shibazaki, N., Alpar, M. A., \& Shaham, J. 1985, Nature,
600: 317, 681
601: \bibitem[macc 2003]{mac03}
602: Maccarone, T. J. \& Coppi, P. S. 2003, A \& A, 399, 1151
603: \bibitem[mes 1988]{mes88}
604: Meszaros, P., Riffert, H., \& Berthiaume, G. 1988, ApJ, 325, 204
605: \bibitem[mil 1998]{mil98}
606: Miller, M.C., Lamb, F.K. \& Psaltis, D. 1998, ApJ, 508, 791
607: \bibitem[paizis 2005]{paiz05}
608: Paizis, A. et al. 2005, A \& A, 444, 357
609: \bibitem[ps 1996]{ps96}
610: Poutanen, J. \& Svensson, R. 1996, ApJ, 470, 249
611: \bibitem[rad 1983]{rad83}
612: Radhakrishnan, V. \& Srinivasan, G. 1982, Current Science, 51, 1096
613: \bibitem[roth 1998]{roth98}
614: Rothschild, R. E. et al. 1998, ApJ, 496, 538
615: \bibitem[shaw 2005]{shaw05}
616: Shaw et al. 2005 A \& A 432, L13
617: \bibitem[sunyaev 1980]{sun80_01}
618: Sibgatullin, N. R. \& Sunyaev, R. A. 2000, Astronomy Letters, 26, 699
619: \bibitem[sunyaev 1980]{sun80_02}
620: Sunyaev, R. A., \& Titarchuk, L. G. 1980, A \& A, 86, 121
621: \bibitem[sunyaev 1980]{sun80_03}
622: Sunyaev, R. A., \& Shakura, N.I. 1986, SvAL, 12, 117
623: \bibitem[sunyaev 1980]{sun80_04}
624: Titarchuk, L. 1994, ApJ, 434, 570
625: \bibitem[klis 2000]{klis 00}
626: Van der Klis, M. 2000, ARA \& A, 38, 717
627: %\bibitem[klis 2000]{klis 00}
628: % Vaughan, B. A. et al. 1994, ApJ, 435, 362
629: \bibitem[wand 1987]{wanf87}
630: Wang, Y. M. \& Schlickeiser, R. 1987, ApJ, 313, 200
631: \bibitem[wijnands 1998]{wijn 98}
632: Wijnands, R. \& van der Klis, M. 1998, Nature, 394, 344
633:
634: \end{thebibliography}
635:
636:
637:
638:
639: \end{document}
640: