1: %***Ryan: I still think you should mention SN 1994W and write
2: % a sentence or two on it. I've indicated other places where
3: % the text can be shortened to accommodate this. In particular,
4: % I think that the evidence for an aspherical *SN* explosion is
5: % weak at best, given our data.
6:
7: \documentclass{emulateapj}
8: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
10: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: %\usepackage{amsmath}
13: %\usepackage[sort&compress]{natbib}
14:
15: \newcommand{\ubvrino}{\protect\hbox{$U\!BV\!RI$}}
16: \newcommand{\bvrino}{\protect\hbox{$BV\!RI$}}
17: \newcommand{\vrino}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RI$}}
18: \newcommand{\vrizjhkno}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RIzJHK$}}
19: \newcommand{\jhkno}{\protect\hbox{$JHK$}}
20: \newcommand{\ubvri}{\protect\hbox{$U\!BV\!RI$} }
21: \newcommand{\bvri}{\protect\hbox{$BV\!RI$} }
22: \newcommand{\vri}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RI$} }
23: \newcommand{\vrizjhk}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RIzJHK$} }
24: \newcommand{\jhk}{\protect\hbox{$JHK$}}
25: \newcommand{\about}{$\sim\!\!$~}
26: %\newcommand{\kms}{\,km\,s$^{-1}$\!}
27:
28: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{displaymath}}
29: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{displaymath}}
30: \newcommand{\err}[2]{\ensuremath{^{+#1}_{-#2}}}
31: \def\lsim{\hbox{\rlap{\raise 0.425ex\hbox{$<$}}\lower 0.65ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
32: \def\gsim{\hbox{\rlap{\raise 0.425ex\hbox{$>$}}\lower 0.65ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
33: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
34: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
35: \def\arcdeg{\mbox{$^\circ$}}%
36: \def\fd{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm d}$}}
37: \def\fh{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm h}$}}
38: \def\fm{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm m}$}}
39: \def\fs{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm s}$}}
40:
41: \newcommand{\nhi}{$N_{\rm HI}$}
42: \newcommand{\mnhi}{N_{\rm HI}}
43: \newcommand{\hr}{{\rm hr}}
44: \newcommand{\amin}{'}
45: \newcommand{\asec}{''}
46: \newcommand{\vlim}{v_{lim}}
47: \newcommand{\ew}{W_\lambda}
48: \newcommand{\feh}{[{\rm Fe/H}]}
49: \newcommand{\znh}{[{\rm Zn/H}]}
50: \newcommand{\ndla}{13}
51: \newcommand{\snpix}{15}
52: \newcommand{\msol}{M_\odot}
53: \newcommand{\pkts}{P_{KS}}
54: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.\ }
55: \newcommand{\delv}{\Delta v}
56: \newcommand{\Lya}{Ly$\alpha$ }
57: \newcommand{\lya}{Ly$\alpha$ }
58: \newcommand{\halph}{H$\alpha$}
59: \newcommand{\chb}{c_{\rm{H\beta}}}
60: \newcommand{\hbeta}{H$\beta$}
61: \newcommand{\hgamma}{H$\gamma$}
62: \newcommand{\hdelta}{H$\delta$}
63: \newcommand{\ndmp}{31 }
64: \newcommand{\nnew}{14 }
65: \newcommand{\nrun}{8,500}
66: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
67: \newcommand{\cm}[1]{\, {\rm cm^{#1}}}
68: \newcommand{\N}[1]{{N({\rm #1})}}
69: \newcommand{\f}[1]{{f_{\rm #1}}}
70: \newcommand{\rAA}{{\AA \enskip}}
71: \newcommand{\sci}[1]{{\rm \; \times \; 10^{#1}}}
72: \newcommand{\ltk}{\left [ \,}
73: \newcommand{\ltp}{\left ( \,}
74: \newcommand{\ltb}{\left \{ \,}
75: \newcommand{\rtk}{\, \right ] }
76: \newcommand{\rtp}{\, \right ) }
77: \newcommand{\rtb}{\, \right \} }
78: \newcommand{\ohf}{{1 \over 2}}
79: \newcommand{\nohf}{{-1 \over 2}}
80: \newcommand{\rhf}{{3 \over 2}}
81: \newcommand{\smm}{\sum\limits}
82: \newcommand{\perd}{\;\;\; .}
83: \newcommand{\cmma}{\;\;\; ,}
84: \newcommand{\sgint}{\sigma_{int}}
85: \newcommand{\Nperp}{N_{\perp} (0)}
86: \newcommand{\intl}{\int\limits}
87: \newcommand{\und}[1]{{\rm \underline{#1}}}
88: \newcommand{\sphr}{\sqrt{R^2 + Z^2}}
89: \newcommand{\vrot}{v_{rot}}
90: \newcommand{\btau}{\bar\tau (v_{pk}) / \sigma (\bar \tau)}
91: \newcommand{\Ipk}{I(v_{pk})/I_{c}}
92: \newcommand{\mkms}{{\rm \; km\;s^{-1}}}
93: \newcommand{\dof}{\rm dof}
94:
95:
96: \shorttitle{Optical Observations of SN~2006jc}
97: \shortauthors{Foley et al.}
98:
99: \begin{document}
100:
101: \title{SN~2006jc: A Wolf-Rayet Star Exploding in a Dense He-Rich
102: Circumstellar Medium}
103:
104: \author{Ryan J. Foley\altaffilmark{1}, Nathan Smith\altaffilmark{1},
105: Mohan Ganeshalingam\altaffilmark{1}, Weidong Li\altaffilmark{1}, Ryan
106: Chornock\altaffilmark{1}, and Alexei V. Filippenko\altaffilmark{1}}
107:
108: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
109: Berkeley, CA 94720-3411; {rfoley, nathans, mganesh, weidong, chornock,
110: alex}@astro.berkeley.edu}
111:
112: \begin{abstract}
113: We present optical photometry and spectra of the peculiar Type Ib
114: supernova (SN) 2006jc. Strong and relatively narrow \ion{He}{1}
115: emission lines indicate the progenitor star exploded inside a dense
116: circumstellar medium (CSM) rich in He. An exceptionally blue
117: apparent continuum persists from our first spectrum obtained 15 days after
118: discovery through our last spectrum \about1 month later. Based on the
119: presence of isolated \ion{Fe}{2} emission lines, we interpret the blue
120: ``continuum'' as blended, perhaps fluorescent, Fe emission. One or two
121: of the reddest \ion{He}{1} line profiles in our spectra are double
122: peaked, suggesting that the CSM has an
123: aspherical geometry. The \ion{He}{1} lines that are superposed on the
124: blue continuum show P-Cygni profiles, while the redder \ion{He}{1}
125: lines do not, implying that the blue continuum also originates from an
126: asymmetric mass distribution. The He-rich CSM, aspherical geometry,
127: and line velocities indicate that the progenitor star was a WNE
128: Wolf-Rayet (WR) star. A recent (2 years before the SN), coincident,
129: luminous outburst similar to those seen in luminous blue variables
130: (LBVs) is the leading candidate for the dense CSM. Such an eruption
131: associated with a WR star has not been seen before, indicating that
132: the progenitor star may have recently transitioned from the LBV phase.
133: We also present unpublished spectral and photometric data on
134: SN~2002ao which, along with SN~1999cq, is very similar to SN~2006jc.
135: We propose that these three objects may represent a new and distinct class
136: of SNe arising from WR progenitors surrounded by a dense CSM.
137: \end{abstract}
138:
139: \keywords{stars---winds, stars---Wolf-Rayet, supernovae---general,
140: supernovae---individual (SN~2006jc; SN~1999cq; SN~2002ao)}
141:
142:
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: %% Section 1: Introduction %%
145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
146:
147: \section{Introduction}\label{s:intro}
148:
149: The most massive stars end their lives as core-collapse supernovae
150: (SNe). The broad category of core-collapse SNe is divided
151: spectroscopically based on the presence or absence of H and He, with
152: the sequence from strong H, to He and weak H, to only He, to
153: lacking both H and He being (respectively) Types II, IIb, Ib, and Ic
154: \citep[see][for a review]{Filippenko97}.
155: These correspond to progenitor stars with progressively decreasing H
156: and He envelopes, with the mass loss caused by either stellar winds or
157: mass transfer to a companion star. Type IIn SNe \citep{Schlegel90}
158: are objects with narrow H emission lines, which are the result of the
159: SN ejecta interacting with a dense circumstellar medium (CSM)
160: \citep{Chugai94}.
161:
162: Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars are evolved, core He-burning stars near
163: the end of their lives. They are thought to be the descendants of
164: stars that begin their lives with initial masses $>$$40 M_{\sun}$,
165: which have already shed their H envelopes during a luminous blue
166: variable (LBV) stage \citep{Smith06}, exposing their He cores
167: \citep[for a review, see][]{Abbott87}. During this stage in stellar
168: evolution, the mass loss from stellar winds is \about$10^{-5}
169: M_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$, about 100 times higher than that of other O and
170: B stars \citep{Crowther06}. Although the WR stage lasts only \about$5
171: \times 10^{5}$ years \citep{Abbott87}, a star can lose several solar
172: masses of material during this stage. These facts suggest that WR
173: stars are possible progenitors of stripped-envelope (Types IIb through
174: Ic) SNe.
175:
176: \citet{Matheson00:99cq} showed that SN~1999cq had intermediate-width
177: (FWHM $\approx 2000 \mkms$) He emission lines similar to the
178: hydrogen lines of SNe~IIn, but
179: lacking H lines. They suggested that SN~1999cq was interacting with a
180: CSM of dense He, but little or no H. Until now, only one other
181: supernova, SN~2002ao \citep{Martin02}, has been identified as having
182: intermediate-width He emission lines
183: \citep{Filippenko02}.
184:
185: SN~2006jc was discovered in \object{UGC 4904} by amateur astronomers
186: \citep{Nakano06} on 2006 Oct.\ 9.75 (UT dates are used throughout
187: this paper). A non-detection was reported on Sep.\ 22, suggesting
188: that the SN was discovered shortly after explosion. Soon after
189: detection, several groups obtained spectra of SN~2006jc and noted the
190: presence of \ion{He}{1} emission lines, but did not associate it with
191: SN~1999cq \citep{Crotts06, Fesen06:06jc1}. \citet{Fesen06:06jc2}
192: later reclassified SN~2006jc as Type Ia, before \citet{Benetti06}
193: noted its similarity to SNe~1999cq and 2002ao.
194:
195: In addition to optical photometry and spectroscopy presented in this
196: Letter, UV and X-ray data were obtained with the {\it Swift}
197: satellite \citep{Brown06}, with a positive X-ray detection, probably
198: indicating CS interaction. Further X-ray observations with {\it
199: Chandra} \citep{Immler06} confirm the {\it Swift} X-ray results.
200:
201: Detailed study of the well-observed SN~2006jc presents an opportunity
202: to examine the progenitor of a rare but important core-collapse SN
203: spanning the gap between SNe IIn and Ib, sampling the environment of a
204: WR star at the end of its stellar life, and helping to clarify what
205: appears to be a new subclass of SNe. Here we present optical
206: photometry and spectroscopy and discuss the implications of those
207: data. We also present observations of SN~2002ao in the interest of
208: completeness, but leave a detailed analysis of all the data for a
209: future paper.
210:
211:
212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
213: %% Section 2: Observations %%
214: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
215:
216: \section{Observations}\label{s:obs}
217:
218: Once the unusual nature of SN~2006jc was noted, we began a monitoring
219: campaign that consisted of \bvri photometry with the Katzman Automatic
220: Imaging Telescope \citep[KAIT;][]{Filippenko01} and optical
221: spectroscopy with the Kast spectrograph \citep{Miller93} mounted on
222: the Lick Observatory 3-m Shane telescope, the LRIS spectrograph
223: \citep{Oke95} mounted on the Keck I 10-m telescope, and the DEIMOS
224: spectrograph \citep{Faber03} mounted on the Keck II 10-m telescope.
225: The multi-band photometry began on Oct.\ 11 while our first spectrum
226: was obtained on Oct.\ 24. The photometry in this paper continues
227: through Dec.\ 16 while our last spectrum in this paper was obtained on
228: Nov.\ 24.
229:
230: All spectral data were reduced using standard techniques
231: \citep[e.g.,][]{Foley03}.
232: %The data were extracted with the optimal
233: %algorithm of \citet{Horne86}. CCD processing of the DEIMOS spectrum
234: %was performed with a modified version of the DEEP pipeline. This
235: %produced rectified, sky subtracted two-dimensional spectra. We
236: %obtained the wavelength scale from low-order polynomial fits to
237: %calibration-lamp spectra. Small wavelength shifts were applied after
238: %cross-correlating night-sky lines extracted with the object to a
239: %template sky.
240: Using our own IDL routines, we fit spectrophotometric
241: standard star spectra to flux-calibrate our data and remove telluric
242: lines \citep{Wade88, Matheson00:93j}.
243: Photometric data were obtained with KAIT and the 1-m Nickel telescope
244: at Lick Observatory. Magnitudes were measured in the Kron-Johnson
245: \bvri system using the point-spread function (PSF)-fitting photometry
246: software \citep{Stetson87} in the IRAF\footnote{IRAF: the Image
247: Reduction and Analysis Facility is distributed by the National Optical
248: Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the Association of
249: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under cooperative
250: agreement with the National Science Foundation (NSF).} DAOPHOT
251: package, as multi-color template images required for galaxy
252: subtraction are not available and the SN is still visible in KAIT
253: data. Since SN~2006jc is bright and reasonably isolated from its
254: faint host galaxy, galaxy subtraction is not necessary, and simple
255: PSF-fitting provides us a reasonable approach to reduce the photometry
256: at this early time. The instrumental magnitudes for SN~2006jc derived
257: this way are calibrated with several local standard stars based on a
258: calibration from the photometric night of Oct.\ 21 with the Nickel
259: telescope.
260:
261:
262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
263: %% Section 3: Results %%
264: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
265:
266: \section{Results}\label{s:results}
267:
268: We present our low-resolution spectra of SN~2006jc in
269: Figure~\ref{f:spec}. In all spectra, we are able to identify
270: intermediate-width \ion{He}{1}, H$\alpha$, \ion{O}{1}, \ion{Ca}{2},
271: and \ion{Fe}{2} emission lines. There are no photospheric P-Cygni
272: profiles typically found in early SN~Ib/c spectra \citep{Matheson01};
273: the spectra seem to consist of two continuum components (red and
274: blue) and intermediate-width ($1000 < v < 4000~\mkms$) emission lines.
275: The redder He lines show a intermediate-width emission component (FWHM
276: $\approx 3000~\mkms$) similar to, but slightly wider than, that of
277: SNe~IIn \citep{Filippenko97}. As seen in Figure~\ref{f:vel}, the
278: bluer He lines show narrow P-Cygni profiles, with the absorption
279: minimum blueshifted by roughly $-1000~\mkms$. The emission components
280: of the lines with P-Cygni profiles are narrower (FWHM $= 1000~\mkms$)
281: than the pure emission components, presumably
282: because their blueshifted emission
283: is self-absorbed. The only discernible characteristic between the
284: groups of lines with the two different types of line profiles is
285: wavelength; in particular, the groups are not distinguished by singlet
286: or triplet state. The line intensity ratios of the \ion{He}{1} lines
287: evolve with time, which may be an indication of changing densities or
288: NLTE effects.
289:
290: \begin{figure}
291: \epsscale{1.20}
292: \rotatebox{90}{
293: \plotone{f1.ps}}
294: \caption{Spectra of SN~2006jc with some line identifications. The
295: black curves are SN~2006jc (from top to bottom, the spectra were
296: obtained on 2006 Oct.\ 24.5, 2006 Oct.\ 30.6, and 2006 Nov.\ 23.6;
297: dates shown are relative to our first photometric observations), the
298: red curve is SN~2002ao obtained on 2002 Feb.\ 21.5, corresponding to
299: $t = 27$ d (all dates relative to our first photometric observation,
300: which, as seen in Figure~\ref{f:lc}, should be close to maximum
301: brightness) with the Lick 3-m telescope, and the blue curve is
302: SN~1999cq \citep{Matheson00:99cq} at $t = 20$ d. A recession velocity
303: of 1670 \kms \citep{Nordgren97}, 1539 \kms \citep{Koribalski04}, and
304: 8200 \kms \citep{Matheson00:99cq} has been removed from the spectra of
305: SNe~2006jc, 2002ao, and 1999cq, respectively. The \ion{He}{1},
306: \ion{Fe}{2}, and \ion{Ca}{2} emission lines of SN~2006jc increase
307: relative to the continuum with time. The blue continuum increases
308: relative to the red continuum with time. SN~2006jc is similar to
309: SNe~2002ao and 1999cq. The main difference is the very blue continuum
310: of SN~2006jc as well as a few lines, most notably the line at \about
311: 6355~\AA. However, the continuum differences are likely the result of
312: reddening for SNe~2002ao and 1999cq, while the line differences may
313: reflect the observations being obtained at slightly different
314: epochs.}\label{f:spec}
315: \end{figure}
316:
317: \begin{figure}
318: \epsscale{1.2}
319: \rotatebox{90}{
320: \plotone{f2.ps}}
321: \caption{\ion{He}{1} lines of SN~2006jc from 2006 Nov.\ 23
322: (lower resolution) and 2006 Nov.\ 24 (higher resolution). The lines
323: from top to bottom are \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 3188$, $\lambda 3889$,
324: $\lambda 4471$, $\lambda 4922$, $\lambda 5016$, $\lambda 5876$,
325: $\lambda 6678$, $\lambda 7065$, $\lambda 7281$, and a line (in blue)
326: we identify as likely H$\alpha$. The lines with $\lambda < 4900$ \AA\
327: exhibit P-Cygni profiles. The \ion{He}{1} lines with $\lambda >
328: 4900$ \AA\ have broad peaks, with \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 7281$ showing a
329: double-peaked profile. The H$\alpha$ profile is much narrower than
330: that of the \ion{He}{1} lines.}\label{f:vel}
331: \end{figure}
332:
333: The spectra all show a relatively flat continuum redward of \about
334: 5500 \AA, but a very steep blue continuum shortward of \about 5500
335: \AA, with a minimum $B-R$ color of $-0.45$ mag. We have identified a
336: few isolated \ion{Fe}{2} lines in the spectra of SN~2006jc (see
337: Figure~\ref{f:spec}), suggesting that there are many other \ion{Fe}{2}
338: lines, mostly at short wavelengths. It is likely that most of the
339: apparent blue ``continuum'' consists of
340: blended Fe lines. \citet{Turatto93} suggested that
341: \ion{Fe}{2} emission lines create the excess blue continuum of
342: SN~1988Z. The blending of the Fe lines makes disentangling the lines
343: difficult, and detailed modeling is necessary to fully interpret our
344: data. However, the amplitudes of the undulations in the blue
345: continuum become larger with time, despite no significant change in
346: the continuum shape. If the apparent continuum is the result of
347: blended Fe lines, the increase of these amplitudes follows the
348: expected result of \ion{Fe}{2} lines increasing relative to the
349: continuum (as seen with isolated \ion{Fe}{2} lines).
350:
351: There are still many features that we are unable to identify, most
352: notably that centered at 6357~\AA\, which may be \ion{Si}{2}
353: $\lambda6355$, with FWHM $\approx 6200~\mkms$. This feature has some
354: substructure and is wider than other emission lines, and thus is
355: likely a blend of several lines. While most emission lines increase
356: relative to the continuum with time, this feature decreases
357: dramatically relative to the continuum and disappears by our Nov.\ 23
358: spectrum, which is likely an excitation effect. Since the \ion{Fe}{2}
359: lines increase relative to the continuum with time, it is most likely
360: some other element. The features at 7881~\AA\ (somewhat blended with
361: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda7774$), 8215~\AA\, and 9360~\AA\ exhibit the same
362: behavior and width, and may be of the same species.
363:
364: The slope of the blue continuum of SN~2006jc does not change much
365: with time. The emission components of all He lines increase relative
366: to the continuum with time, while some other species, including
367: \ion{O}{1}, decrease with time. The \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet also
368: increases with time, consistent with other SNe. The evolution of the
369: blue continuum is apparent in Figure~\ref{f:lc}. The $B$-band light
370: curve declines more slowly than the other bands, which is unusual for
371: a SN light curve. This supports the argument that the blue continuum
372: is the result of a process not typically seen in SNe.
373:
374: \begin{figure}
375: \epsscale{1.0}
376: \rotatebox{0}{
377: \plotone{f3.ps}}
378: \caption{({\it top large panel}): $R$-band light curve of SN~2006jc
379: with comparison light curves of SNe~1994I (Ic), 1999cq, 2002ao, and
380: 2002bu (IIn). The light curve of SN~2002bu is very different from the
381: others, having a slower rise and decline, and a slight plateau. All
382: other light curves appear similar for \about10 days past $R$ maximum,
383: after which SN~1999cq declines much faster than the other three. At
384: \about25 days, SNe~2006jc and 1994I slow their decline, while
385: SN~2002ao continues its decline. At \about55 days, SN~2006jc begins a
386: faster decline, separating from SN~1994I. \citet{Arkharov06} note a
387: brightening in \jhk from days \about30 to 55, corresponding to the
388: plateau in the $R$ band. The expected light curve from $^{56}$Co
389: decay, corresponding to 0.0098 mag day$^{-1}$, is plotted as the solid
390: red line. ({\it inset}): \bvri light curves of SN~2006jc. The SN
391: declines rapidly with $\Delta m_{15} (B) = 1.14$. The early (late)
392: decline rates are 0.088 (0.100), 0.087 (0.092), 0.099 (0.066), and
393: 0.092 (0.054) mag day$^{-1}$ for \bvrino, respectively. ({\it bottom
394: panel}): The $B-R$ color curve of SN~2006jc with comparison curves of
395: SNe~1994I (Ic) and 2002bu (IIn). SN~2006jc is very blue with $B-R =
396: -0.45$ mag on JD 2454040.}
397: \label{f:lc}
398: \end{figure}
399:
400: SN~2006jc has maximum absolute magnitudes of $-17.8$, $-17.7$,
401: $-17.8$, and $-18.1$ for \bvrino, respectively, making it
402: as luminous as SN~1994I \citep{Richmond96}. Assuming that nearly all
403: of its luminosity comes from $^{56}$Ni to $^{56}$Co to $^{56}$Fe
404: decay, the fact that SNe~1994I and 2006jc have similar luminosities
405: suggests they created similar $^{56}$Ni masses, \about0.07 $M_{\sun}$
406: \citep{Nomoto94}.
407:
408: The early-time decline rates of SNe~2006jc, 2002ao, and 1999cq are
409: much faster than those of normal SNe~IIn (see Figure~\ref{f:lc} for a
410: comparison to SN~IIn 2002bu). The early light curves of
411: SNe~IIn are powered mainly by circumstellar interaction and their slow
412: declines at early times indicate a massive CSM. Despite showing
413: obvious features of circumstellar interaction in their spectra,
414: SNe~2006jc, 2002ao, and 1999cq all decline very quickly, suggesting an
415: extremely dense, but low-mass and clumpy CSM. The late-time decline rates
416: of these objects are also very fast, indicating either a small $^{56}$Ni
417: mass or a small ejecta mass.
418:
419: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
420: %% Section 4: Discussion %%
421: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
422:
423: \section{Discussion}\label{s:discussion}
424:
425: \subsection{Wolf-Rayet Progenitor in a Dense, He-Rich CSM}\label{ss:he}
426:
427: The strength of the intermediate-width \ion{He}{1} emission lines in
428: SN~2006jc relative to other SNe~Ib is indicative of a dense CSM rich
429: in He. Similar to the H lines seen in SN~IIn spectra, the
430: He lines of SN~2006jc are the result of the SN
431: ejecta interacting with a dense CSM. The \ion{He}{1} lines seen only
432: in emission have FWHM $\approx$ 2000--3000~\kms, and the
433: absorption minimum of the P-Cygni profiles is \about 1000~\kms,
434: velocities typical of WR winds \citep{Abbott87}. The identification
435: of H$\alpha$ suggests that the progenitor recently ejected material
436: containing at least some H into its surroundings, perhaps meaning that
437: the progenitor recently evolved from a LBV to a WNE WR star
438: \citep{Abbott87}. Additionally, the smaller width of the H$\alpha$
439: line is consistent with a different ejection mechanism from that of
440: the He. LBVs typically have slower expansion speeds than WR stars,
441: indicating that the H might have been ejected during the LBV stage,
442: while the He was ejected during the WR stage. \citet{Matheson00:99cq}
443: did not see any H$\alpha$ in the spectrum of SN~1999cq, but the
444: low signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum makes the measurement
445: ambiguous. The spectrum of SN~2002ao does show relatively strong
446: H$\alpha$ (see Figure~\ref{f:spec}), suggesting that its CSM contains
447: more H than that of SN~2006jc.
448:
449: As noted by \citet{Nakano06}, there was a bright ($M = -14.0$ mag)
450: outburst coincident with the position of SN~2006jc in Oct.\ 2004,
451: which was initially thought to be an LBV outburst similar to SN~1961V
452: \citep{Goodrich89}. Unless it was a mere coincidence, it seems that
453: the progenitor of SN~2006jc suffered an event analogous to the
454: non-terminal eruptions of LBVs shortly before final core collapse,
455: ejecting a He-rich shell with which the SN ejecta are now
456: interacting. The short time between these events may have
457: far-reaching implications for the late evolution of massive stars,
458: beyond what we can discuss here; however, it is worth noting that
459: \citet{Chugai04} determined that SN~IIn~1994W had an outburst
460: \about1.5 years prior to explosion. Equally surprising is that this
461: type of event may have happened in a star inferred to be a WN star;
462: while such outbursts are known to occur in LBVs that still have their
463: H envelopes, no such variability has been documented in WN stars. It
464: may hint that the progenitor of SN~2006jc had just recently
465: transitioned from the LBV to the WN stage, supporting the notion that
466: LBV mass loss facilitates the onset of the WR phase. This would seem
467: consistent with the presence of H in its CSM.
468:
469: \subsection{Blue Continuum}\label{ss:bluecont}
470:
471: The slow $B$-band decline relative to the $R$ band, the steep blue
472: continuum, and the P-Cygni profiles for \ion{He}{1} all suggest that
473: the emission at wavelengths shorter than \about5500 \AA\ arises from a
474: mechanism that is different from that which produces the red
475: continuum. We identified some isolated \ion{Fe}{2} lines, suggesting
476: that many other \ion{Fe}{2} lines are present in the spectrum, but are
477: blended and appear as a pseudo-continuum because of their large line
478: widths. Since we do not see other high-excitation lines, this
479: emission might be provided by fluorescence and not collisional
480: excitation.
481:
482: \citet{Matheson00:99cq} noted that SN~1999cq had a bluer continuum
483: than normal SNe~Ic. They also noted that SN~1999cq had $E(B-V)
484: \lesssim 0.45$ mag, and argued that $E(B-V) \lesssim 0.25$ mag.
485: Similarly, SN~2002ao may be extinguished. Correcting for reasonably
486: small reddening, the continua of both SNe~1999cq and 2002ao have
487: similar colors to that of SN~2006jc, indicating that these events may
488: also have a strong blue continuum. The main difference
489: between the spectra is the strong \ion{Ca}{2} H\&K absorption in
490: SN~1999cq.
491:
492: \subsection{Aspherical Geometry}\label{ss:aspherical}
493:
494: The double-peaked nature of some \ion{He}{1} lines suggest a complex,
495: asymmetric CSM. Unlike SNe~IIn, the light curve of SN~2006jc declined
496: very quickly, suggesting that there is little mass in the CSM.
497: However, the strong emission lines indicate a very dense CSM. These
498: facts are compatible if the CSM is asymmetric or clumpy. Also, the
499: P-Cygni profiles seen only for the blue \ion{He}{1} lines also
500: indicate asymmetry, because the blue continuum is absorbed by the He
501: gas, whereas the red continuum (presumably from the inner SN debris)
502: is not.
503:
504: A simple way to explain these observables is supernova ejecta
505: interacting with a bipolar CSM, which causes the double-peaked nature
506: of the He lines. The He-rich CSM, which was likely the result of the
507: recent (2004) outburst, may be asymmetric because of either rapid
508: rotation in the progenitor or strong interaction with a binary
509: companion.
510:
511: \begin{acknowledgments}
512:
513: Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck
514: Observatory, which was made possible by the generous financial support
515: of the W. M. Keck Foundation. We thank the Keck and Lick Observatory
516: staffs for their assistance. This research was supported by NSF grant
517: AST-0607485 and the TABASGO Foundation. KAIT was made possible by
518: generous donations from Sun Microsystems, Inc., the Hewlett-Packard
519: Company, AutoScope Corporation, Lick Observatory, the NSF, the
520: University of California, and the Sylvia \& Jim Katzman Foundation.
521: \end{acknowledgments}
522:
523: {\it Facilities:} \facility{KAIT}, \facility{Nickel}, \facility{Shane
524: (Kast Double spectrograph)}, \facility{Keck:I (LRIS)},
525: \facility{Keck:II (DEIMOS)}
526:
527: \begin{thebibliography}{33}
528: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
529:
530: \bibitem[{{Abbott} \& {Conti}(1987)}]{Abbott87}
531: {Abbott}, D.~C., \& {Conti}, P.~S. 1987, \araa, 25, 113
532:
533: \bibitem[{{Arkharov} {et~al.}(2006){Arkharov}, {Efimova}, {Leoni}, {Di Paola},
534: {Di Carlo}, \& {Dolci}}]{Arkharov06}
535: {Arkharov}, A., {Efimova}, N., {Leoni}, R., {Di Paola}, A., {Di Carlo}, E., \&
536: {Dolci}, M. 2006, ATEL, 961
537:
538: \bibitem[{{Benetti} {et~al.}(2006){Benetti}, {Capellaro}, {Elias-Rosa},
539: {Harutyunyan}, {Chornock}, {Filippenko}, {Foley}, {Pastorello}, \&
540: {Andreuzzi}}]{Benetti06}
541: {Benetti}, S., et al. 2006, CBET, 674
542:
543: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2006){Brown}, {Immler}, \& {Modjaz}}]{Brown06}
544: {Brown}, P.~J., {Immler}, S., \& {Modjaz}, M. 2006, ATEL, 916
545:
546: \bibitem[{{Chugai} \& {Danziger}(1994)}]{Chugai94}
547: {Chugai}, N.~N., \& {Danziger}, I.~J. 1994, \mnras, 268, 173
548:
549: \bibitem[{{Chugai} {et~al.}(2004)}]{Chugai04}
550: Chugai, N.~N., et al. 2004, \mnras, 352, 1213
551:
552: \bibitem[{{Crotts} {et~al.}(2006){Crotts}, {Eastman}, {DePoy}, {Prieto}, \&
553: {Garnavich}}]{Crotts06}
554: {Crotts}, A., {Eastman}, J., {DePoy}, D., {Prieto}, J.~L., \& {Garnavich}, P.
555: 2006, CBET, 672, 1
556:
557: \bibitem[{{Crowther}(2006)}]{Crowther06}
558: {Crowther}, P.~A. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
559:
560: \bibitem[{{Faber} {et~al.}(2003){Faber}, {Phillips}, {Kibrick}, {Alcott},
561: {Allen}, {Burrous}, {Cantrall}, {Clarke}, {Coil}, {Cowley}, {Davis}, {Deich},
562: {Dietsch}, {Gilmore}, {Harper}, {Hilyard}, {Lewis}, {McVeigh}, {Newman},
563: {Osborne}, {Schiavon}, {Stover}, {Tucker}, {Wallace}, {Wei}, {Wirth}, \&
564: {Wright}}]{Faber03}
565: {Faber}, S.~M., et al. 2003, ed. M. Iye; A.~F.~M. Moorwood, SPIE Proc., Vol. 4841, p. 1657
566:
567: \bibitem[{{Fesen} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Fesen}, {Milisavljevic}, \&
568: {Rudie}}]{Fesen06:06jc1}
569: {Fesen}, R., {Milisavljevic}, D., \& {Rudie}, G. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, CBET, 672
570:
571: \bibitem[{{Fesen} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Fesen}, {Milisavljevic}, \&
572: {Rudie}}]{Fesen06:06jc2}
573: ---. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, CBET, 674
574:
575: \bibitem[{{Filippenko}(1997)}]{Filippenko97}
576: {Filippenko}, A.~V. 1997, \araa, 35, 309
577:
578: \bibitem[{{Filippenko} \& {Chornock}(2002)}]{Filippenko02}
579: {Filippenko}, A.~V., \& {Chornock}, R. 2002, \iaucirc, 7825
580:
581: \bibitem[{{Filippenko} {et~al.}(2001){Filippenko}, {Li}, {Treffers}, \&
582: {Modjaz}}]{Filippenko01}
583: {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Li}, W.~D., {Treffers}, R.~R., \& {Modjaz}, M. 2001, in
584: Small Telescope Astronomy on Global Scales, ed. B.~{Paczy\'{n}ski}, W.-P.
585: {Chen}, \& C.~{Lemme} (San Francisco: ASP), 121
586:
587: \bibitem[{{Foley} {et~al.}(2003){Foley}, {Papenkova}, {Swift}, {Filippenko},
588: {Li}, {Mazzali}, {Chornock}, {Leonard}, \& {Van Dyk}}]{Foley03}
589: {Foley}, R.~J., et al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 1220
590:
591: \bibitem[{{Goodrich} {et~al.}(1989){Goodrich}, {Stringfellow}, {Penrod}, \&
592: {Filippenko}}]{Goodrich89}
593: {Goodrich}, R.~W., {Stringfellow}, G.~S., {Penrod}, G.~D., \& {Filippenko},
594: A.~V. 1989, \apj, 342, 908
595:
596: \bibitem[{{Humphreys} \& {Davidson}(1994)}]{Humphreys94}
597: {Humphreys}, R.~M., \& {Davidson}, K. 1994, \pasp, 106, 1025
598:
599: \bibitem[{{Immler} {et~al.}(2006){Immler}, {Modjaz} \& {Brown}}]{Immler06}
600: {Immler}, S., {Modjaz}, M., \& {Brown}, P.~J., 2006, ATEL, 934
601:
602: \bibitem[{{Koribalski} {et~al.}(2004){Koribalski}, {Staveley-Smith}, {Kilborn},
603: {Ryder}, {Kraan-Korteweg}, {Ryan-Weber}, {Ekers}, {Jerjen}, {Henning},
604: {Putman}, {Zwaan}, {de Blok}, {Calabretta}, {Disney}, {Minchin}, {Bhathal},
605: {Boyce}, {Drinkwater}, {Freeman}, {Gibson}, {Green}, {Haynes}, {Juraszek},
606: {Kesteven}, {Knezek}, {Mader}, {Marquarding}, {Meyer}, {Mould}, {Oosterloo},
607: {O'Brien}, {Price}, {Sadler}, {Schr{\"o}der}, {Stewart}, {Stootman}, {Waugh},
608: {Warren}, {Webster}, \& {Wright}}]{Koribalski04}
609: {Koribalski}, B.~S., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 16
610:
611: \bibitem[{{Martin} {et~al.}(2002){Martin}, {Li}, {Qiu}, \& {West}}]{Martin02}
612: {Martin}, P., {Li}, W.~D., {Qiu}, Y.~L., \& {West}, D. 2002, \iaucirc, 7809, 3
613:
614: \bibitem[{{Matheson} {et~al.}(2000{\natexlab{a}}){Matheson}, {Filippenko},
615: {Chornock}, {Leonard}, \& {Li}}]{Matheson00:99cq}
616: {Matheson}, T., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Chornock}, R., {Leonard}, D.~C., \& {Li},
617: W. 2000{\natexlab{a}}, \aj, 119, 2303
618:
619: \bibitem[{{Matheson} {et~al.}(2000{\natexlab{b}}){Matheson}, {Filippenko},
620: {Ho}, {Barth}, \& {Leonard}}]{Matheson00:93j}
621: {Matheson}, T., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Ho}, L.~C., {Barth}, A.~J., \& {Leonard},
622: D.~C. 2000{\natexlab{b}}, \aj, 120, 1499
623:
624: \bibitem[{{Matheson} {et~al.}(2001){Matheson}, {Filippenko}, {Li}, {Leonard},
625: \& {Shields}}]{Matheson01}
626: {Matheson}, T., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Li}, W., {Leonard}, D.~C., \& {Shields},
627: J.~C. 2001, \aj, 121, 1648
628:
629: \bibitem[{{Miller} \& {Stone}(1993)}]{Miller93}
630: {Miller}, J.~S., \& {Stone}, R.~P.~S. 1993, {Lick Obs. Tech. Rep. 66} (Santa
631: Cruz: Lick Obs.)
632:
633: \bibitem[{{Nakano} {et~al.}(2006){Nakano}, {Itagaki}, {Puckett}, \&
634: {Gorelli}}]{Nakano06}
635: {Nakano}, S., {Itagaki}, K., {Puckett}, T., \& {Gorelli}, R. 2006, CBET, 666
636:
637: \bibitem[{{Nomoto} {et~al.}(1994){Nomoto}, {Yamaoka}, {Pols}, {van den Heuvel},
638: {Iwamoto}, {Kumagai}, \& {Shigeyama}}]{Nomoto94}
639: {Nomoto}, K., {Yamaoka}, H., {Pols}, O.~R., {van den Heuvel}, E.~P.~J.,
640: {Iwamoto}, K., {Kumagai}, S., \& {Shigeyama}, T. 1994, \nat, 371, 227
641:
642: \bibitem[{{Nordgren} {et~al.}(1997){Nordgren}, {Chengalur}, {Salpeter}, \&
643: {Terzian}}]{Nordgren97}
644: {Nordgren}, T.~E., {Chengalur}, J.~N., {Salpeter}, E.~E., \& {Terzian}, Y.
645: 1997, \aj, 114, 913
646:
647: \bibitem[{{Oke} {et~al.}(1995){Oke}, {Cohen}, {Carr}, {Cromer}, {Dingizian},
648: {Harris}, {Labrecque}, {Lucinio}, {Schaal}, {Epps}, \& {Miller}}]{Oke95}
649: {Oke}, J.~B., et al. 1995, \pasp, 107, 375
650:
651: \bibitem[{{Richmond} {et~al.}(1996){Richmond}, {van Dyk}, {Ho}, {Peng}, {Paik},
652: {Treffers}, {Filippenko}, {Bustamante-Donas}, {Moeller}, {Pawellek},
653: {Tartara}, \& {Spence}}]{Richmond96}
654: {Richmond}, M.~W., et al. 1996, \aj, 111, 327
655:
656: \bibitem[{{Schlegel}(1990)}]{Schlegel90}
657: {Schlegel}, E.~M. 1990, \mnras, 244, 269
658:
659: \bibitem[{{Smith} \& {Owocki}(2006)}]{Smith06}
660: {Smith}, N., \& {Owocki}, S.~P. 2006, \apj, 645, L45
661:
662: \bibitem[{{Stetson}(1987)}]{Stetson87}
663: {Stetson}, P.~B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
664:
665: \bibitem[{{Turatto} {et~al.}(1993){Turatto}, {Cappellaro}, {Danziger},
666: {Benetti}, {Gouiffes}, \& {della Valle}}]{Turatto93}
667: {Turatto}, M., {Cappellaro}, E., {Danziger}, I.~J., {Benetti}, S., {Gouiffes},
668: C., \& {Della Valle}, M. 1993, \mnras, 262, 128
669:
670: \bibitem[{{Wade} \& {Horne}(1988)}]{Wade88}
671: {Wade}, R.~A., \& {Horne}, K. 1988, \apj, 324, 411
672:
673: \end{thebibliography}
674:
675: \clearpage
676:
677: \end{document}
678: