1: % Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[english,apjl]{emulateapj}
4: %
5: % use emulateapj and apjfonts for page estimates also placing the
6: % figures in the correct positions
7: %
8: %\usepackage{times}
9: \usepackage{apjfonts}
10: %\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
11: %\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
12: %\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
13: %\usepackage{graphicx}
14: %\usepackage{amssymb}
15: %
16:
17: \makeatletter
18:
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \shortauthors{Lahuis et al.}
24: \shorttitle{Molecular Starburst Fingerprints in (U)LIRG Nuclei}
25:
26: \title{Infrared Molecular Starburst Fingerprints in Deeply Obscured (U)LIRG Nuclei}
27: \author{F.~Lahuis\altaffilmark{1,2},
28: H.~W.~W.~Spoon\altaffilmark{3,4},
29: A.~G.~G.~M.~Tielens\altaffilmark{5},
30: S.~D.~Doty\altaffilmark{6},
31: L.~Armus\altaffilmark{7},
32: V.~Charmandaris\altaffilmark{8,9},
33: J.~R.~Houck\altaffilmark{3},
34: P.~St\"auber\altaffilmark{10}, \&
35: E.~F.~van~Dishoeck\altaffilmark{1}
36: }
37:
38: \altaffiltext{1}{Leiden Observatory, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden,
39: The Netherlands}
40: \altaffiltext{2}{SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research,
41: P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands}
42: \email{F.Lahuis@sron.rug.nl}
43: \altaffiltext{3}{Cornell University, Astronomy Department, Ithaca, NY 14853}
44: \altaffiltext{4}{{\it Spitzer} Fellow}
45: \altaffiltext{5}{MS 245-3, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035}
46: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Denison University,
47: Granville, OH 43023, USA}
48: \altaffiltext{7}{Caltech, {\it Spitzer} Science Center, MS 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
49: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics, University of Crete,
50: GR-71003, Heraklion, Greece}
51: \altaffiltext{9}{IESL / Foundation for Research and Technology-
52: Hellas, PO Box 1527, GR-71110, Heraklion, Greece, and
53: Chercheur Associ\'e, Observatoire de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France}
54: \altaffiltext{10}{Institute of Astronomy, ETH-Zentrum, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland}
55:
56:
57: \setcounter{footnote}{10}
58: \begin{abstract}
59: High resolution spectra of the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope
60: show vibration-rotation
61: absorption bands of gaseous C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and CO$_2$ molecules toward a
62: sample of deeply obscured (U)LIRG nuclei. The observed bands reveal the
63: presence of dense ($n\gtrsim 10^7\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$), warm
64: ($T_\mathrm{ex}=200 - 700\,\mathrm{K}$) molecular gas with high column
65: densities of these molecules ranging from a few
66: $10^{15} - 10^{17}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$.
67: Abundances relative to H$_2$, inferred from the silicate optical depth, range
68: from $\sim10^{-7}$ to $10^{-6}$ and show no correlation with temperature.
69: Theoretical studies show that the high abundances of both C$_2$H$_2$
70: and HCN exclude a X-ray dominated region (XDR) associated with the
71: toroid surrounding an AGN as the origin of this dense warm molecular gas.
72: Galactic massive protostars in the so-called Hot Core phase have
73: similar physical characteristics with comparable high abundances of
74: C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and CO$_2$ in the hot phase. However, the abundances of
75: C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN and the C$_2$H$_2$/CO$_2$ and HCN/CO$_2$ ratios
76: are much higher toward the (U)LIRGs in the cooler
77: ($T_\mathrm{ex}\lesssim 400$\,K) phase.
78: %ULIRGs and the
79: %C$_2$H$_2$/CO$_2$ and HCN/CO$_2$ ratios in the ULIRG sample are much higher
80: %than in comparable protostars.
81: We suggest that the warm dense molecular gas
82: revealed by the mid-IR absorption lines is associated with a phase
83: of deeply embedded star formation where the extreme pressures and
84: densities of the nuclear starburst environment have inhibited the
85: expansion of H{\sc ii} regions and the global disruption of the star
86: forming molecular cloud cores, and `trapped' the star formation
87: process in an `extended' Hot Core phase.
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: \keywords{infrared: ISM --
91: ISM: evolution --
92: ISM: galaxies --
93: ISM: molecules --
94: galaxies: nuclei }
95:
96:
97: \section{Introduction}
98: \label{sec:introduction}
99: One of the holy grails in the study of
100: luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs and ULIRGs)
101: is to elucidate the true nature of the central energy source.
102: (U)LIRGs emit nearly all their energy in the mid and far-infrared
103: part of the spectrum. LIRGs have a luminosity
104: $L_{8-1000\mu\mathrm{m}} > 10^{10} L_\odot$ and ULIRGs
105: $L_{8-1000\mu\mathrm{m}} > 10^{12} L_\odot$, equal to the power output of quasars.
106: (U)LIRGs are generally found in interacting and merging systems
107: \citep*[e.g][]{armus87,sanders88a,murphy96}.
108: During the merger large amounts of gas and dust are concentrated toward
109: the nucleus \citep*[e.g.][]{mihos96}, fueling a massive starburst and
110: possibly a massive black hole (an AGN).
111: (U)LIRGs are without doubt the most spectacular sites of star formation
112: in the Universe and if a substantial part of their energy originates from
113: AGN activity, it would show the AGN in its very earliest deeply
114: enshrouded phase.
115:
116:
117: The sensitive Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) \citep{houck04} on board the
118: {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope \citep*{werner04} has revealed the richness,
119: complexity and diversity of the mid-infrared spectra toward a sample of
120: deeply obscured (U)LIRGs \citep*[][]{armus04,armus06a,armus06b,spoon06a,spoon06b};
121: see \citet*[][]{genzel00} for a review of results from the
122: Infrared Space Observatory.
123: The general characteristic of these spectra is the presence of deep, broad
124: absorption of amorphous silicates, centered at 10 and 18 $\mu$m. In addition, the
125: spectra show a large variety in absorption features of crystalline
126: silicates, aliphatic hydrocarbons, water ice, and gas phase bands of
127: hot CO \citep*[][]{spoon04,spoon06c}. PAH emission bands are generally weak
128: and in some cases absent.
129: Absorption bands of more volatile ices (e.g. CO or CO$_2$), commonly
130: detected in Galactic dense molecular clouds, are generally absent or
131: very weak.
132:
133:
134: The very compact nuclei of deeply obscured (U)LIRGs are packed with gas.
135: Molecular gas has been observed at millimeter wavelengths
136: --- through its low lying pure rotational transitions --- in (U)LIRG
137: nuclei \citep*[e.g.][]{solomon97,downes98}, see \citet*{aalto05} for
138: a recent overview. In recent years millimeter emission lines of HCN
139: and HCO$^+$ have been observed revealing the presence of relatively
140: dense ($n_\mathrm{H}\sim10^5\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$) molecular gas
141: \citep*[][]{imanishi06,kohno05}.
142: However, the analysis of the millimeter emission lines is complicated
143: as a result of beam dilution which strongly depends on the molecules
144: and transitions observed.
145:
146:
147: The IRS Short-High spectrometer (IRS-SH) on board the {\it Spitzer}
148: Space Telescope allows for the first time the direct study of the
149: very dense and warm molecular gas in the central regions of deeply
150: obscured luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies through IR pencil-beam
151: line-of-sight absorption spectroscopy against the continuum of individual
152: nuclei or unresolved%
153: \footnote{The IRS-SH slit width is 4.7", equal to the size of the PSF at $19.5\mu$m.}
154: double nuclei.
155: In particular, the mid-infrared vibration-rotation bands of C$_2$H$_2$
156: and HCN uniquely trace warm ($100<T<1000$\,K) and dense
157: ($n_\mathrm{H}>10^7\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$) molecular gas.
158: These bands have previously been detected primarily toward Galactic
159: massive protostars \citep*[][]{lacy89,evans91,lahuis00}.
160: They may prove to be a new strong tool to probe the heating sources
161: of deeply obscured (U)LIRG nuclei (starburst or AGN activity).
162:
163:
164: %\input{f1.tex}
165:
166: \section{Observations}
167: The observations presented in this paper are part of the {\it Spitzer}
168: IRS observing programs (PID) 105 (IRS GTO ULIRG program, J.R.\,Houck PI),
169: 96 (IRS GTO program on nearby AGN, J.R.\,Houck PI) and 1096
170: (Director's Discretionary Time (DDT) proposal, H.W.W.\,Spoon PI).
171: The IRS GTO ULIRG sample comprises $\sim$100 ULIRGs in the redshift
172: range 0.02 $< z <$ 0.93, selected primarily from the IRAS
173: 2-Jy sample \citep{strauss92}, IRAS 1-Jy sample \citep{kim98}
174: and the FIRST/IRAS radio-far-IR sample \citep{stanford00}.
175: The samples of PIDs 96 and 1096 contain 3 additional ULIRGs
176: (IRAS\,04384--4848, IRAS\,03000--2719 and IRAS\,02113--2937)
177: and 3 additional LIRGs (IRAS 02530+0211, IC\,860 and NGC\,4418).
178: For all sources in this combined sample low-resolution spectra
179: ($R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim100$) have been obtained, while high
180: resolution spectra ($R=600$) have been taken only for the
181: brighter half of the sample.
182:
183:
184: All high resolution spectra in this sample have been investigated
185: for the presence of vibration-rotation absorption bands of
186: C$_2$H$_2$ (13.7\,$\mu$m), HCN (14.02\,$\mu$m) and CO$_2$ (15.0\,$\mu$m)
187: against the nuclear continuum.
188: Fifteen of the sources listed in Table \ref{tab:observations} show
189: absorption due to (some of) these species.
190: Because of the low signal to noise ratio of the spectra and/or the low H-column
191: densities (as derived from the 9.7 um silicate optical depth; see Section
192: \ref{sec:abundances}), the derived upper limits on the molecular column
193: densities for all other sources do not place very stringent constraints
194: on the C2H2 and HCN abundances.
195: To illustrate this, four sources without positive detections with both a
196: moderate-to-large hydrogen column density and good signal to noise
197: spectra, are included in Tables \ref{tab:observations} and \ref{tab:analysis}.
198: The upper limits on the C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN abundances fall within the
199: range of derived abundances toward the fifteen sources.
200:
201:
202: Data reduction started from crosstalk corrected echelle images
203: using S12 and S13 {\it Spitzer} archive data. Processing was done using
204: the c2d analysis pipeline \citep{kessler06,lahuis06}.
205: It includes echelle image analysis (a.o. bad-pixel detection, image arithmic,
206: and optimal spectral extraction),
207: defringing of the extracted spectra \citep{lahuis03}, and spectral analysis
208: (see Section \ref{sec:mol_analysis}).
209: The optimal spectral extraction uses an analytical source profile defined
210: and calibrated using a suite of calibrator stars. Calibration is
211: done using MARCS stellar models provided by the {\it Spitzer} Science Center
212: \citep{decin04}. The optimal spectral extraction employs a combined
213: source and local sky fit. This provides wavelength dependent sky estimates
214: and allows to discriminate between resolved and unresolved spectral
215: features.
216:
217:
218: Figure \ref{fig:all_ulirgs} shows the continuum divided, sky and
219: redshift-corrected spectra from $13.5 - 15.5\,\mu$m covering the
220: absorption bands of C$_2$H$_2$, HCN and CO$_2$.
221: Plotted in red are the best-fit single temperature synthetic spectra
222: (see Section \ref{sec:results}). Indicated with the dotted verticals
223: are the positions of the ground-state $Q$-branch transitions of the three
224: molecules. For IRAS\,15250+3609, IRAS\,20100--4156, and IC\,860 a small
225: section of the spectrum in between HCN and CO$_2$ is affected by
226: artifacts in inter-order sections of the spectrum, and these sections
227: have been clipped from the presented spectra.
228:
229:
230: %\input{tab1.tex}
231: %\input{tab2.tex}
232:
233: \section{Analysis}
234: \label{sec:results}
235:
236: \subsection{Molecular analysis}
237: \label{sec:mol_analysis}
238: The {\it Spitzer} spectra unambiguously reveal the presence of the
239: $Q$-branch transitions of C$_2$H$_2$ \hbox{$\nu_5=1-0$}, HCN $\nu_2=1-0$
240: and CO$_2$ $\nu_2=1-0$, each of which blends into a
241: "broad'' absorption feature. The corresponding $P$- and $R$-branch
242: transitions of these species are difficult to observe with the
243: {\it Spitzer}-IRS due to spectral dilution at the IRS resolving power and
244: the presence of instrumental fringe residuals with frequencies and
245: amplitudes close to those of the $P$- and $R$-branch lines.
246: The $Q$-branch transitions are analyzed using a pure absorption model
247: assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) excitation of the
248: levels at a single temperature. The adopted method is described in
249: detail in \citet{lahuis00} and \citet*{boonman03}, which includes
250: references to the molecular parameters and data used in the model.
251: The main fit parameters are the excitation temperature and
252: column density along the line of sight for a given intrinsic line
253: width, defined by the Doppler $b$-value.
254: It is assumed that the absorbing molecules have a covering factor
255: of unity of the continuum, i.e. the mid-IR continuum is composed solely
256: by the regions toward which the molecular absorption features arise.
257: A covering factor less than unity, i.e. larger continuum emitting
258: regions, increases the true optical depth of the absorption features
259: resulting in higher column densities and possibly lower temperatures
260: (when lowest excitation lines saturate at large column densities).
261:
262:
263: The derived excitation parameters do not strongly depend on the
264: exact value of $b$. Only for low values
265: of $b$ ($\lesssim 5$\,km\,s$^{-1}$) will saturation result in
266: an underestimate of the column density for the
267: sources with the largest column densities. Such low $b$ values are
268: expected for quiescent gas where thermal broadening dominates.
269: However, non-thermal broadening will likely dominate in the dense
270: energetic ISM of the galactic nuclei and larger $b$ values are expected.
271:
272:
273: A direct estimate of $b$ is obtained from spectrally resolved
274: CO $\nu=1-0$ absorption lines toward the north-west nucleus of IRAS\,08572+3915
275: \citep*[][]{geballe06}, which shows a complex velocity structure. A low column
276: density, cold CO component absorbs near the systemic velocity.
277: The CO absorption is however dominated by a broad (FWHM
278: $\sim 200\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$) blue-shifted warm ($\gtrsim$ 200 K)
279: gas component.
280: This is most likely the conglomerate of a velocity distribution over
281: multiple lines of sight within the beam.
282: The continuum confusion then requires a higher column density than
283: that of $2\times 10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$ estimated from the observed
284: optical depth by \citet*[][]{geballe06}.
285: We have fitted synthetic LTE absorption spectra to the higher
286: excitation CO lines using the spectrum of \citet[][]{geballe06}
287: but with the spectral resolution reduced to match the observed profile
288: width ($R\sim1500$).
289: This allows to estimate a velocity
290: averaged column density for a given $b$ value.
291: Values $< 10\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$ result in progressively poorer fits.
292: Good fits are made for $b$ values of $10-25\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$
293: requiring column densities of $\sim2\times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$ down to
294: $\sim5\times 10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$.
295: The Doppler $b$-value has therefore been fixed to $20\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$
296: for all sources.
297:
298:
299: Recent observations using TEXES \citep*[][]{lacy02}, visitor instrument
300: on Gemini-North, have
301: revealed spectrally resolved (FWHM $\sim 80\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$)
302: blue-shifted absorption in the C$_2$H$_2$ \hbox{$\nu_5=1-0$} R(13)
303: ro-vibrational line toward one of our sources, NGC\,4418 (Knez, private
304: communication). The current data do not allow to put more stringent
305: constraints on the Doppler $b$-value. However, the spectrally resolved
306: C$_2$H$_2$ absorption could be an indication that multiple (spatial and
307: velocity) components of the warm and dense gas are common in (U)LIRG nuclei.
308:
309:
310: \subsection{Fit results}
311: \label{sec:fits}
312: Table \ref{tab:analysis} lists the derived excitation temperatures
313: and column densities from best fit synthetic spectra to the continuum
314: divided (U)LIRG spectra. Excitation temperatures ranging from
315: 200 to 700\,K and column densities of a few $\times 10^{15}$ to
316: $10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ are observed. These results are derived from a
317: simultaneous fit to the three absorption bands, in which the excitation
318: temperature, set to be the same for all three molecules, is
319: constrained by the $Q$-branch profiles of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN.
320: Since the analysis is restricted to that of the analysis of the
321: resolved $Q$-branches
322: (see \ref{sec:mol_analysis}), the derived excitation temperatures
323: are not well constrained ($\sim 30\%$). However it does clearly
324: allow to discriminate between molecular gas with warm ($\sim 200-300$\,K)
325: and hot ($\sim 500-700$\,K) excitation temperatures.
326: This is illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:mol_fit} by fits to the
327: observed absorption profiles of IC\,860 and IRAS\,01003-2238, for
328: which we derive excitation temperatures of 280 and 630\,K respectively.
329:
330: The $Q$-branch profiles of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN reveal significant contributions
331: to the absorption from relatively high rotational levels. Hence, given the
332: high critical density of these levels, the absorbing gas is likely very
333: dense ($n\gtrsim10^7$ cm$^{-3}$).
334: Observations of the ro-vibrational transitions of CO in IRAS\,08572+3915
335: and IRAS\,00183-7111 indeed imply densities in excess of
336: $3\times 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep*[][]{geballe06,spoon04}.
337:
338:
339: \subsection{Abundances}
340: \label{sec:abundances}
341: The derived column densities are translated into abundances by using a
342: total hydrogen column density obtained from the apparent optical depth of the
343: $9.7\mu$m silicate absorption band listed in Table \ref{tab:observations}.
344: The optical depth is converted assuming:
345: $$N_\mathrm{H}=\tau_{9.7}(3.5\times 10^{22})\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2},$$
346: appropriate for the dust in the solar neighbourhood \citep*{roche84,roche85}.
347:
348: This relation is most appropriate for embedded (extinction dominated) sources
349: probing the absorption along the pencil beam line of sight toward the
350: warm central continuum emitting region.
351: To illustrate, for the sample of Galactic massive protostars (see
352: Section \ref{sec:hot_cores}) the hydrogen column density derived using
353: the silicate optical depth estimated from the ISO-SWS archive spectra
354: agrees within a factor of two with the hydrogen column density derived
355: from CO $\nu=1-0$ measurements \citep{mitchell90,lahuis00}.
356:
357:
358: Another estimate of the applicability of this method is provided
359: through the analysis of the 4.6\,$\mu$m CO $\nu=1-0$ absorption spectrum
360: toward IRAS\,08572+3915NW, which
361: gives CO column densities of $\sim 5 \times 10^{18}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$
362: up to $\sim 2\times 10^{19}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ depending on the
363: assumed value of $b$ (see Section \ref{sec:mol_analysis}).
364: Adopting $N_\mathrm{CO}/N_\mathrm{H}=10^{-4}$ (all gas-phase carbon in CO)
365: this results in
366: $N_\mathrm{H}=5\times 10^{22} - 2\times 10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$.
367: This is in reasonable agreement
368: with the hydrogen column density derived from the silicate optical depth
369: ($N_\mathrm{H} \sim 1.5\times 10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$).
370: %The strong molecular absorption bands (see Section \ref{sec:fits}) reveal
371: %the presense of deeply embedded sources in all fifteen ULIRG nuclei.
372: %The hydrogen column density estimated from the silicate optical depth is
373: %therefore assumed to be accurate to within an order of magnitude.
374: If anything, the IRAS\,08572+3915NW data suggest the hydrogen column density
375: might be slightly overestimated (e.g. as a result of foreground extinction)
376: resulting in underestimating the derived molecular abundances.
377: We assume a similar uncertainty for the other sources.
378:
379:
380: The derived abundances and H$_2$ column densities (assuming
381: $N_{\mathrm{H}_2}=N_{\mathrm{H}}/2$) are listed in Table \ref{tab:analysis}.
382: The HCN abundance is up to three orders of magnitude higher
383: than in cold molecular clouds \citep*[][]{bergin97}. %,irvine87}.
384: High abundances of HCN, C$_2$H$_2$, and CO$_2$ have also been
385: measured for Galactic massive protostars (see Section \ref{sec:hot_cores}).
386: Figures \ref{fig:chem_model} and \ref{fig:abundances}
387: compare the abundances to chemical models and results from studies
388: of Galactic massive young stellar objects (Section \ref{sec:discussion}).
389:
390: %\input{f2.tex}
391: %\input{f3.tex}
392:
393: \subsection{Gas temperature}
394:
395: The derived excitation temperatures range from 200 to 700 K.
396: While statistics are small, of the seven sources with the highest gas
397: excitation temperatures ($T_{\mathrm ex}=400-700$\,K) five sources show
398: the highest 5.5 $\mu$m to 28 $\mu$m continuum flux ratio.
399: These galaxies also show a rising near-IR continuum typical for hot dust
400: while the other galaxies show a decreasing near-IR continuum characteristic
401: for emission dominated by stellar photospheres. It seems thus that there is a
402: connection between the observed dust and molecular excitation temperatures.
403:
404:
405: The presence of absorption (rather than emission) lines implies a strong
406: gradient in the temperature and an underlying hot-dust continuum
407: against which the absorption lines are formed.
408: However, the derived excitation temperatures of the molecular gas
409: for the warmest sources ($T_{\mathrm ex} =400-700$\,K) are higher by a factor
410: of 2 to 3 than the mid-IR color temperature derived from the
411: 5.5 to 28.0\,$\mu$m flux ratio.
412: While the discrepancy between the excitation temperatures and the
413: mid-IR color temperature may (in part) reflect the uncertainties in the
414: analysis, the observed colder dust continuum may point towards the
415: importance of continuum extinction by
416: (a shell of) colder foreground dust exterior to the C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN
417: absorbing layer, or the predominance of emission of cold nuclear dust
418: within the IRS aperture (i.e. a small beam filling factor for the warm
419: dust and gas). Both may result in an added uncertainty
420: in the derived abundances resulting from overestimating the hydrogen column
421: density or from a covering factor of the molecule rich warm
422: gas less than unity (see Section \ref{sec:mol_analysis}).
423:
424:
425: \section{Discussion}
426: \label{sec:discussion}
427:
428: \subsection{Warm molecular gas in (U)LIRGs}
429: \label{subsec:warm-mol-gas}
430: The {\it Spitzer}-IRS spectra reported here reveal surprisingly strong mid-IR
431: absorption bands of C$_2$H$_2$, HCN and CO$_2$ toward a sample of (U)LIRG
432: nuclei. These absorptions reveal the presence of copious amounts of warm
433: molecular material and are in line with earlier detections of warm
434: CO gas \citep*[][]{spoon04,spoon06a,geballe06}. This molecular gas is
435: very dense ($n\gtrsim 3\times 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$) and warm ($T\sim 200-700$ K).
436: Given the column density and estimated density, this gas occupies only
437: a small fraction of the nuclear region ($\sim 0.01$ pc) and, given
438: its high temperature, is likely located near the intrinsic mid-infrared
439: source of luminosity of these regions.
440:
441:
442: %At present there are no good means to infer the nature of the power source
443: %dominating the bolometric luminosity in infrared luminous galaxies. None
444: %of the diagnostic diagrams based on line ratios, continuum colors or PAH
445: %equivalent width are in agreement \citep{armus06b}.
446: At present there are still substantial uncertainties in accurately inferring
447: the nature of the power source dominating the bolometric luminosity in
448: infrared luminous galaxies. As discussed in \citet{armus06b}, it appears
449: that there are disagreements among various diagnostic diagrams based on line
450: ratios, continuum colors or PAH equivalent width.
451: %, which are related to the extreme
452: %extinction complex geometry of the ionizing sources.
453: Perusal of the $2-40\mu$m spectra
454: reveal that the sources with molecular gas absorptions appear to be a
455: ``mixed bag''. While most sources show a deep silicate feature, some
456: (e.g., Mrk231, IRAS\,01003-2238, IRAS\,05189-2524 and IRAS\,13218+0552) do not.
457: Indeed, the $2-40\mu$m continuum spectra of these sources show strong
458: similarities with the spectra of bona fide AGN-dominated spectra with
459: shallow silicate features.
460: In contrast, sources like IRAS\,17208-0014 and IRAS\,22491-1808 look
461: quite starburst-like. Finally, sources such as IRAS\,08572+3915 show
462: neither signs of starburst activity
463: (e.g., PAH features) nor signs of AGN activity (e.g., high ionization lines
464: or a broad H$\alpha$ line). While the presence of hot dust,
465: as visible in the near-IR, may be taken as evidence for the presence of
466: an embedded AGN in this source, any deeply obscured source -- including
467: deeply embedded protostars -- will produce hot dust. Indeed, the overall
468: mid-IR spectrum of IRAS\,08572+3915 resembles that of many galactic
469: massive protostars, such as AFGL\,2591, with a preponderance of dust
470: absorption features.
471:
472:
473: The C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and CO$_2$ molecular lines may provide a new probe of
474: the conditions in the inner deeply obscured nuclei and hence shed light
475: on the ultimate power source of (U)LIRGs; e.g., starburst phenomena
476: versus AGN activity.
477: %In that respect it should be noted that, on the one hand,
478: In particular, the presence of copious amounts of warm molecular gas enriched
479: in C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and CO$_2$ is common in regions of massive star
480: formation \citep{boonman03,lahuis00,lacy89,evans91}, while, on the
481: other hand, X-rays associated with a central black hole can influence
482: molecular chemistry and abundances far beyond the mean free path
483: length of stellar (E)UV photons.
484: The molecular observations are discussed in the light of these scenarios in
485: the next subsections. While the possible errors associated with the
486: derived abundances are recognized, the discussion will center
487: on Figures \ref{fig:chem_model} and \ref{fig:abundances}.
488:
489:
490: \subsection{AGN activity and X-ray driven chemistry}
491: \label{sec:ss_model}
492:
493: Sub-millimeter studies have revealed high HCN/CO (and HCN/HCO$^+$)
494: abundance ratios in Seyfert type I nuclei and this has been taken as
495: an indication of the importance of X-ray illumination for the composition
496: of the molecular gas in these nuclei \citep*[][]{imanishi06,kohno05}.
497: Some of the sources in our sample are known to harbor an AGN.
498: In particular, Mrk 231 and IRAS 13218+0552 are QSOs, IRAS 08572+3915 and
499: UGC\,5101 are LINERs, and IRAS\,01003-2238, IRAS\,05189-2524 and
500: Mrk\,273 have optical LINER/Seyfert\,2 spectra
501: (see Table \ref{tab:observations}).
502: %for an overview of known optical classifications).
503: Hence, the observed high abundance of HCN, and by inference
504: C$_2$H$_2$ (which has no pure rotational transitions), may indicate
505: the presence of a buried AGN in all of our sources. The complex geometry
506: and inhomogeneous dust distribution associated with the central toroid
507: may then preclude our detection of the putative X-rays photons from the
508: central engine driving the chemistry of the molecular gas. The mid-IR
509: observations presented in this paper add to the submillimeter results
510: the predominance of {\it warm} molecular gas. Within the AGN heating scenario,
511: it seems obvious to attribute the high temperature of the molecular gas to the
512: importance of X-ray heating in a so-called XDR \citep*{maloney96,meijerink05}.
513: Alternatively \citet{gao04} argue that most (U)LIRGs are dominated by
514: starburst power rather than AGN power based on the HCN $J=1-0$ luminosity and
515: CO $J=1-0$ luminosity relation. In a starburst scenario the HCN/CO ratio
516: traces the amount of dense molecular gas in the galactic ISM.
517: %and the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio traces the amount of dense molecular gas.
518: Our observations may present an additional test for these two scenarios.
519:
520:
521: X-rays are not only an efficient heating agent of the gas but also have a major
522: influence on the chemical composition. This has been explored in the
523: context of AGNs by \citet*{maloney96,meijerink05}, and for regions around
524: protostars by \citet*{stauber05,stauber06}. At the high densities
525: relevant for these
526: regions, the gas temperature is set by a balance between X-ray heating and
527: gas-dust collisional cooling. As an example, a gas temperature of 200 K at a
528: density of $\sim 3\times 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ requires a X-ray flux of
529: $\sim 30$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ which for a typical Seyfert galaxy with
530: an X-ray luminosity of $10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$ corresponds to a distance
531: of 50 pc for an unobscured view of the central engine.
532: For the molecular features to be seen in absorption, the mid-IR continuum
533: has to arise from an inner, warmer zone (e.g., exposed to a higher X-ray flux).
534: Since most of these (U)LIRGs show no evidence for strong X-ray emission while
535: the column density associated with the molecular gas
536: ($10^{22}-10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$)
537: is small compared to X-ray attenuation lengths, in this AGN-scenario, the
538: direct view of the nucleus would have to be blocked by a high-column-density,
539: edge-on toroid while the warm molecular gas is offset to the polar regions
540: and has a little-obstructed view of the nucleus.
541:
542:
543: An AGN origin for the high abundance of warm HCN, C$_2$H$_2$, and CO$_2$ in
544: these (U)LIRGs however faces severe theoretical difficulties. Specifically,
545: the high X-ray flux required to explain the observed temperatures readily
546: dissociates the molecules
547: and drives the gas atomic \citep*{maloney96,meijerink05}. Indeed, calculated
548: HCN abundances are typically less than $10^{-8}$ wrt. H in X-ray
549: illuminated gas while C$_2$H$_2$ is virtually destroyed for X-ray fluxes
550: in excess of 1 erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
551: This is illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:chem_model} which presents the
552: static steady-state chemical composition after equilibrium is reached
553: ($\sim 10^5$\,yr) for clouds illuminated by X-rays. Here, static means
554: that the chemistry has been
555: evolved in time -- while the X-ray flux, temperature, and density are fixed --
556: until steady state is achieved in the chemical abundances
557: \citep*[see also][]{stauber05,stauber06}. The X-ray spectrum is assumed to be
558: thermal in nature with $T_\mathrm{X}$=$3\times10^7$\,K.
559: The chemistry is relatively insensitive to the assumed shape of the
560: spectrum \citep[e.g.,][]{maloney96}.
561: As these models demonstrate, strong X-ray irradiation leads to decreased
562: abundances of molecular species such as HCN and C$_2$H$_2$.
563: These results are consistent with earlier studies \citep*[e.g.][]{lepp96} which
564: show an initial increase in the HCN abundance with increasing ionization rate
565: ($\xi/n_\mathrm{H}$ up to $10^{-18}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$)
566: but then an effectively complete destruction of HCN for
567: $\xi/n_\mathrm{H}\gtrsim10^{-17}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$.
568: For comparison, the X-ray flux implied by a gas temperature of 200 K
569: ($\simeq$ 30 erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) corresponds to an ionization rate of
570: $5\times 10^{-17}$ cm$^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ at a density of $10^6$ cm$^{-3}$.
571: Clearly, the warm molecular gas revealed by these observations is inconsistent
572: with strong X-ray illumination.
573:
574:
575: \subsection{Static hot-core chemistry}
576: \label{sec:hot_cores}
577:
578: At first sight our mid-infrared results resemble those toward a
579: sample of massive Galactic young stellar objects (YSOs). For these,
580: the molecular absorption features
581: originate in the warm, dense gas near the newly formed star during
582: the so-called hot core phase \citep{boonman03,lahuis00,lacy89,evans91}.
583: This is generally thought to represent a very early phase
584: ($\Delta t\leq$10$^5$\,yr) in the formation of massive stars, during
585: the transition from the deeply embedded stage to the phase where
586: ionizing photons can escape the protostellar accretion envelope
587: and create first a hyper- and later an ultra-compact H{\sc ii} region
588: \citep*[see review by][]{cesaroni05}. The molecular composition of
589: the hot core is very different from that of cold molecular clouds.
590: This is thought to reflect the evaporation of ices -- resulting from
591: accretion and surface chemistry during the cold preceding dark cloud phase --
592: when the envelope is heated by the newly formed star \citep*{walmsley93}.
593: Subsequent high temperature gas-phase chemistry
594: significantly enhances the abundance of e.g. CH$_4$, C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN
595: up to three orders of magnitude, compared to cold dense molecular cloud
596: abundances, for the most evolved sources \citep{viti99,doty02,rodgers03}.
597:
598:
599: In Figure \ref{fig:abundances} the observed abundances and abundance ratios
600: toward the (U)LIRGs are compared to those of a sample of Galactic massive YSOs.
601: Both the YSO and the (U)LIRG sample show comparable, large variations in
602: gas temperature and abundances. However, the HCN and C$_2$H$_2$ abundances
603: show a positive correlation with the gas temperature for the YSO
604: sample but not for the (U)LIRG sample. Indeed, at low temperatures
605: ($<400$ K), the (U)LIRG abundances are some two orders of magnitude larger
606: than those in YSO spectra.
607:
608:
609: For the Galactic YSOs, the observed correlation between the excitation
610: temperature and the observed abundances (Figure~\ref{fig:abundances})
611: are in fair agreement with chemical models for such regions \citep*{stauber05}.
612: The absence of a similar temperature correlation for (U)LIRGs may reflect a
613: systematic (and large) error in the abundance determination
614: (Section \ref{sec:abundances}) or it may reflect a true difference
615: between the chemical or physical evolution of the warm gas of the YSOs
616: and (U)LIRGs. In this respect, we note that the C$_2$H$_2$/HCN ratio for
617: both samples are very similar, however the CO$_2$/HCN and CO$_2$/C$_2$H$_2$
618: ratios are reduced for the (U)LIRG sample up to an order of magnitude.
619: If static steady-state hot-core chemistry were to apply to the (U)LIRGs
620: as it does to the YSOs, CO$_2$ would have been detected toward most of the
621: sources in our sample. The fact it has not, suggests that a different
622: chemistry may apply to the warm molecular gas in these (U)LIRGs.
623:
624:
625: \subsection{Pressure confined starburst chemistry}
626: \label{sec:outflow}
627: Static steady-state hot-core and X-ray chemical models have difficulties
628: to consistently reproduce the observed high abundances of warm C$_2$H$_2$
629: and HCN gas and low abundance of CO$_2$ gas for most of our (U)LIRG sample.
630: Essentially, static chemistry has a hard time producing high abundance of
631: HCN and C$_2$H$_2$ in the warm ($100-400$\,K) gas characteristic
632: for most of our (U)LIRG sample, while at the same time reducing
633: the CO$_2$ abundance. One possible solution to this conundrum
634: is to produce high C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN, and low CO$_2$ abundances
635: in hot gas ($\gtrsim 800$\,K), and then transport it outward to the cooler
636: gas on a dynamical timescale which is rapid compared to the chemical timescale.
637: At high temperatures, the hydrocarbon and nitrogen chemistry are enhanced
638: as most of the oxygen is converted into water by neutral-neutral
639: reactions. The abundances of molecules such as C$_{2}$H$_{2}$,
640: CH$_{4}$, and HCN can be increased by orders of magnitude
641: \citep*[e.g.][]{doty02,rodgers03} while at the same time the
642: formation of CO$_{2}$ is reduced as its primary formation route
643: through OH is blocked.
644: For cold Galactic molecular clouds, the chemical timescale is set by the
645: cosmic ray ionization rate and is about $3\times 10^5$ yr, independent
646: of density \citep{glassgold73}.
647: In a (U)LIRG (or AGN) environment, the cosmic ray flux may be increased
648: considerably, shortening this timescale. Likewise, neutral-neutral reaction
649: channels may open up in warm gas, further reducing the chemical timescale.
650: In any case, these timescales are much shorter than the evolutionary
651: timescale of massive stars or of the starburst. With the typical sizescale
652: of the warm molecular zone ($\sim 3\times 10^{16}$ cm), a timescale of
653: $3\times 10^5$ yr translates into a `diffusion' velocity of only
654: 0.03 km\,s$^{-1}$.
655: Even a 100 times faster chemical timescale only requires a `diffusion'
656: velocity of a few km\,s$^{-1}$. Since the chemical models are well capable of
657: explaining high abundances for both C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN and a low abundance
658: for CO$_2$ at high temperatures and densities, and in
659: light of the discussion above, this `mixing' is attributed to the global
660: activity created by pressure confined massive starburst activity.
661: The strong gravitational potential in the nuclei of these galaxies
662: inhibits the disruption of the
663: surrounding warm molecular envelopes by H{\sc ii} regions and supernovae,
664: while producing sufficient turbulent (or wind) motion to distribute warm
665: C$_2$H$_2$- and HCN-rich and CO$_2$-poor gas in the colder outer
666: envelope regions.
667:
668:
669: \section{Summary}
670:
671: We have observed the absorption lines due to the $Q$-branch transitions of
672: C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and CO$_2$ in the mid-IR spectra of a large number of (U)LIRGs.
673: These observations reveal for the first time the presence of copious amounts
674: of warm (200-700 K), dense ($n>10^7$ cm$^{-3}$) molecular gas in these nuclei.
675: The origin of this warm molecular gas is unclear. Theoretical models show that
676: the X-ray fluxes implied by the elevated gas temperatures rapidly destroy
677: these molecules and hence it is unlikely that this warm molecular
678: gas is associated with a dense toroid surrounding an active central engine.
679: Warm, dense gas rich in C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and CO$_2$ is commonly observed
680: towards galactic massive protostars and is associated with a short-lived
681: phase -- the Hot Core phase -- before advancing ionization fronts disrupt the core.
682: The high molecular abundances in galactic Hot Cores are well understood
683: chemically. However, the derived abundances of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN for the
684: cooler (U)LIRGs ($T_\mathrm{ex} \simeq 200-400$ K) in our sample
685: as well as the C$_2$H$_2$/CO$_2$
686: and HCN/CO$_2$ ratios are very different from those in galactic protostars.
687: We suggest that this warm molecular gas is associated with a phase of deeply
688: embedded star formation in (U)LIRGs where the high pressures and densities have
689: inhibited the disruption of the star forming, molecular cores
690: by prohibiting the expansion of HII regions, trapping the star formation
691: process in an extended Hot-Core phase.
692: The chemical differences between
693: these (U)LIRGs and galactic Hot Cores may then reflect enhanced mixing
694: between warm and cold phases due to the high degree of
695: turbulence or wind motion associated with extreme starburst environments.
696: Pressure confined massive starburst activity may thus be the driving
697: energy source behind the observed C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN rich warm molecular gas
698: and responsible for most of the near-IR characteristics of the deeply
699: obscured (U)LIRGs.
700:
701:
702: The current analysis is predominately based on the observed abundances
703: derived from moderate resolution, mid-IR vibration-rotation absorption bands
704: of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN. This analysis can be extended
705: using high resolution, velocity resolved, ground-based studies of the
706: $P$- and $R$ branches of these molecules as well as from
707: the $\nu=1-0$ rotation-vibration band of CO. In addition, observations
708: of more molecular rotation-vibration bands and high excitation
709: submillimeter lines of a large sample of molecules may be instrumental for
710: progress in this field. Specifically, velocity and spatially resolved
711: infrared and millimeter data can constrain the source morphology.
712: In combination with optimized physicochemical models for individual
713: sources it may become possible to draw firm conclusions about the physical
714: characteristics of the warm molecular gas and the true
715: nature of the power sources in the (U)LIRG nuclei.
716:
717:
718: \acknowledgments
719: The authors would like to thank Tom Geballe for sharing early results
720: and the CO data of IRAS\,08572+3915NW; John Lacy and Claudia Knez for
721: sharing the TEXES data; and Bernhard Brandl, Kees Dullemond,
722: Masa Imanishi, David Rupke, and Marco Spaans for many useful discussions.
723: Astrochemistry in Leiden is supported by a Spinoza grant from NWO.
724:
725:
726: \begin{thebibliography}{}
727: \bibitem[Aalto(2005)Aalto]{aalto05}
728: Aalto S. 2005, in IAU Symposium 231,
729: ed. Dariusz, C.~L., Geoffrey, A.~B., \& Eric, H.
730: (Cambridge University Press), 261
731:
732: \bibitem[Armus, Heckman, \& Miley(1987)Armus, Heckman, \& Miley]{armus87}
733: Armus, L. and Heckman, T.~M., \& Miley, G.~K. 1987, \aj, 94, 831
734:
735: \bibitem[Armus, Heckman, \& Miley(1989)Armus, Heckman, \& Miley]{armus89}
736: Armus, L. and Heckman, T.~M., \& Miley, G.~K. 1989, \apj, 347, 727
737:
738: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2004)Armus et al.]{armus04}
739: Armus, L., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 178
740:
741: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2006a)Armus et al.]{armus06a}
742: Armus, L., et al. 2006, \apj, 640, 204
743:
744: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2006b)Armus et al.]{armus06b}
745: Armus, L., et al. 2006, \apj, (in press atro-ph/0610218)
746:
747: \bibitem[Bergin \& Langer(1997)Bergin \& Langer]{bergin97}
748: Bergin, E.~A. and Langer, W.~D. 1997, \apj, 486, 316
749:
750: \bibitem[Boonman et al.(2003)Boonman et al.]{boonman03}
751: Boonman, A.M.S., van Dishoeck, E.F, Lahuis, F., \& Doty, S.D.
752: 2003, \aap, 399, 1063
753:
754: \bibitem[Cesaroni(2005)Cesaroni]{cesaroni05}
755: Cesaroni, R. 2005,
756: in IAU Symposium 227,
757: ed. Cesaroni, R., Felli, M., Churchwell, E., \&Walmsley, M.
758: (Cambridge University Press), 59
759:
760: \bibitem[Darling \& Giovanelli(2002)Darling \& Giovanelli]{darling02}
761: Darling, J., \& Giovanelli, R. 2002, \aj, 124, 100
762:
763: \bibitem[Decin et al.(2004)Decin et al.]{decin04}
764: Decin, L., Morris, P.~W., Appleton, P.~N., Charmandaris, V.,
765: Armus, L., \& Houck, J.~R. 2004, \apjs, 154, 408
766:
767: \bibitem[Doty et al.(2002)Doty et al.]{doty02}
768: Doty, S.D., van Dishoeck, E.F., van der Tak, F.F.S., \& Boonman, A.M.S.
769: 2002, \aap, 389, 446
770:
771: \bibitem[Downes \& Solomon(1998)Downes \& Solomon]{downes98}
772: Downes, D. \& Solomon, P.~M. 1998, \apj, 507, 615
773:
774: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1991)Evans et al.]{evans91}
775: Evans, N.~J., Lacy, J.~H., \& Carr, J.~S. 1991, \apj, 383, 674
776:
777: \bibitem[Gao \& Solomon(2004)Gao \& Solomon]{gao04}
778: Gao, Y. \& Solomon, P.~M. 2004, \apj, 606, 271
779:
780: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(2006)Geballe et al.]{geballe06}
781: Geballe, T.~R., Goto, M., Usuda, T., Oka, T., McCall, B.~J.
782: 2006, \apj, 644, 907
783:
784: \bibitem[Genzel \& Cesarsky(2000)Genzel \& Cesarsky]{genzel00}
785: Genzel, R. \& Cesarsky, C.J. 2000, \araa, 38, 761
786:
787: \bibitem[Glassgold \& Langer(1973)Glassgold \& Langer]{glassgold73}
788: Glassgold, A.~E. \& Langer, W.~D. 1973, \apjl, 179, 147
789:
790: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)Houck et al.]{houck04}
791: Houck, J.~R., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
792:
793: \bibitem[Imanishi et al.(2006)Imanishi et al.]{imanishi06}
794: Imanishi M., Nakanishi, K., \& Kohno, K. 2006, \aj, 31, 2888
795:
796: \bibitem[Lacy et al.(2002)Lacy et al.]{lacy02}
797: Lacy, J., et al. 2002, PASP, vol. 114, 153
798:
799: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2006)Kessler-Silacci et al.]{kessler06}
800: Kessler-Silacci, J., et al. 2006, \apj, 639, 275
801:
802: \bibitem[Kim \& Sanders(1998)Kim \& Sanders]{kim98}
803: Kim, D.-C. \& Sanders, D.~B. 1998, \apjs, 119, 41
804:
805: \bibitem[Kohno(2005)Kohno]{kohno05}
806: Kohno, K. 2005
807: in AIP 783: The Evolution of Starbursts,
808: ed. H{\"u}ttmeister, S., Manthey E., Bomans, D., \& Weis, K.
809: (AIP Conference Proceedings), 203 (astro-ph/0508420)
810:
811: \bibitem[Lacy et al.(1989)Lacy et al.]{lacy89}
812: Lacy, J.~H., Evans, N.~J., Achtermann, J.~M., Bruce, D.~E.,
813: Arens, J.~F., \& Carr, J.~S. 1989 \apjl, 342, L43
814:
815: \bibitem[Lahuis \& van Dishoeck(2000)Lahuis \& van Dishoeck]{lahuis00}
816: Lahuis, F., \& van Dishoeck, E.~F. 2000, \aap, 355, 699
817:
818: \bibitem[Lahuis \& Boogert(2003)Lahuis \& Boogert]{lahuis03}
819: Lahuis, F. and Boogert, A. 2003,
820: in SFChem 2002: Chemistry as a Diagnostic of Star Formation,
821: ed. C.~L. Curry and M. Fich. (NRC Press, Ottawa, Canada), 2003, 335.
822:
823: \bibitem[Lahuis et al.(2006)Lahuis et al.]{lahuis06}
824: Lahuis, F. et al. 2006, ``c2d Spectroscopy Explanatory Supplement",
825: (Pasadena: {\it Spitzer} Science Center)
826:
827: \bibitem[Lepp \& Dalgarno(1996)Lepp \& Dalgarno]{lepp96}
828: Lepp, S. \& Dalgarno, A. 1996, \aap, 306, L21
829:
830: \bibitem[Low et al.(1988)Low et al.]{low88}
831: Low, F.~J., Cutri, R.~M., Huchra, J.~P., \& Kleinmann, S.~G.
832: 1988, \apjl, 327, 41
833:
834: \bibitem[Maloney et al.(1996)Maloney et al.]{maloney96}
835: Maloney, P.~R., Hollenbach, D.~J., \& Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M. 1996,
836: \apj, 466, 561
837:
838: \bibitem[Meijerink \& Spaans(2005)Meijerink \& Spaans]{meijerink05}
839: Meijerink, R., \&Spaans, M. 2005, \aap, 436, 397
840:
841: \bibitem[Mihos \& Hernquist(1996)Mihos \& Hernquist]{mihos96}
842: Mihos, J.~C., \& Hernquist, L. 1996, \apj, 464, 641
843:
844: \bibitem[Mitchell et al.(1990)Mitchell et al.]{mitchell90}
845: Mitchell, G.~F., Maillard, J.-P., Allen, M., Beer, R., \& Belcourt, K.
846: 1990, \apj, 363, 554
847:
848: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(1996)Murphy et al.]{murphy96}
849: Murphy, T.~W., Armus, L., Matthews, K., Soifer, B.~T.,
850: Mazzarella, J.~M., Shupe, D.~L., Strauss, M.~A., \& Neugebauer, G.
851: 1996, \aj, 111, 1025
852:
853: \bibitem[Roche \& Aitken(1984)Roche \& Aitken]{roche84}
854: Roche, P.~F., \& Aitken, D.~K. 1984, \mnras, 208, 481
855:
856: \bibitem[Roche \& Aitken(1985)Roche \& Aitken]{roche85}
857: Roche, P.~F., \& Aitken, D.~K. 1985, \mnras, 215, 425
858:
859: \bibitem[Rodgers \& Charnley(2003)Rodgers \& Charnley]{rodgers03}
860: Rodgers, S.D., \& Charnley, S.B.
861: 2003, \apj, 585, 355
862:
863: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988a)Sanders et al.]{sanders88a}
864: Sanders, D.~B., Soifer, B.~T., Elias, J.~H.,
865: Neugebauer, G., \& Matthews, K. 1988, \apjl, 328, 35
866:
867: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988b)Sanders et al.]{sanders88b}
868: Sanders, D.~B., Soifer, B.~T., Elias, J.~H., Madore, B.~F.,
869: Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., \& Scoville, N.~Z. 1988, \apj, 325, 74
870:
871: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1997)Solomon et al.]{solomon97}
872: Solomon, P.~M., Downes, D., Radford, S.~J.~E., \& Barrett, J.~W. 1997,
873: \apj, 478, 144
874:
875: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2004)Spoon et al.]{spoon04}
876: Spoon, H.~W.~W., Armus, L., Cami, J., Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.,
877: Chiar, J.~E., Peeters, E., Keane, J.~V., Charmandaris, V.,
878: Appleton, P.~N., Teplitz, H.~I., \& Burgdorf, M.~J.
879: 2004, \apjs, 154, 184
880:
881: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2006a)Spoon et al.]{spoon06a}
882: Spoon, H.~W.~W., Keane, J.~V., Cami, J., Lahuis, F.,
883: Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M., Armus, L., \& Charmandaris, V.
884: 2006, in IAU Symposium 231,
885: ed. Dariusz, C.~L., Geoffrey, A.~B., \& Eric, H.
886: (Cambridge University Press), 281
887:
888: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2006b)Spoon et al.]{spoon06b}
889: Spoon, H.~W.~W., Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M., Armus, L., Sloan, G.~C.,
890: Sargent, B., Cami, J., Charmandaris, V., Houck, J.~R.,
891: \& Soifer, B.~T. 2006, \apj, 638 759
892:
893: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2006c)Spoon et al.]{spoon06c}
894: Spoon H.~W.~w., Marshall, J.~A., Houck, J.~R., Elitzur M.,
895: Hao, L., Armus, L., Brandl, B.~R., \& Charmandaris, V., ApJL
896: (astro-ph/0611918)
897:
898: \bibitem[Stanford et al.(2000)Stanford et al.]{stanford00}
899: Stanford, S.~A., Stern, D., van Breugel, W. \& De Breuck, C.
900: 2000, \apjs, 131, 185
901:
902: \bibitem[St\"{a}uber et al.(2005)St\"{a}uber et al.]{stauber05}
903: St\"{a}uber, P., Doty, S. D., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Benz, A. O.,
904: 2005, A\&A, 440, 949
905:
906: \bibitem[St\"{a}uber et al.(2006)St\"{a}uber et al.]{stauber06}
907: St\"{a}uber, P., Benz, A. O., J\o{r}gensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F.,
908: Doty, S. D., \& F.~F.~S. van der Tak, A\&A, (astro-ph/0608393)
909:
910: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(1992)Strauss et al.]{strauss92}
911: Strauss, M.~A., Huchra, J.~P., Davis, M., Yahil, A.,
912: Fisher, K.~B. \& Tonry, J. 1992, \apjs, 83, 29
913:
914: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(1995)Veilleux et al.]{veilleux95}
915: Veilleux, S., Kim, D.-C., Sanders, D.~B., Mazzarella, J.~M., \&
916: Soifer, B.~T. 1995, \apjs, 98, 171
917:
918: \bibitem[Veilleux, Goodrich, \& Hill(1997)Veilleux, Goodrich, \& Hill]{veilleux97}
919: Veilleux, S., Goodrich, R.~W., \& Hill, G.~J. 1997, \apj, 477, 631
920:
921: \bibitem[Viti \& Williams(1999)Viti \& Williams]{viti99}
922: Viti, S., \& Williams, D.~A. 1999, \mnras, 305, 755
923:
924: \bibitem[Walmsley \& Schilke(1993)Walmsley \& Schilke]{walmsley93}
925: Walmsley, C.~M., \& Schilke, P. 1993,
926: in Dust and Chemistry in Astronomy,
927: ed. Millar T.J., \& Williams, D.A. (IOP Publishing, Bristol), 37
928:
929: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)Werner et al.]{werner04}
930: Werner, M., et al. 2004, \apjs, 54, 1
931:
932: \end{thebibliography}
933:
934: %
935: % all tables, table 1 source specifics
936: % table 2 lte fits and basic sed info
937: %
938: \clearpage
939: \input{tab1.tex}
940: \clearpage
941: \input{tab2.tex}
942:
943: \clearpage
944:
945: \begin{figure*}
946: \plotone{f1.eps}
947: \caption{\label{fig:all_ulirgs}%
948: Continuum divided {\it Spitzer}-IRS spectra of a sample of (U)LIRGs showing
949: the absorption bands of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN and some of CO$_2$.
950: Plotted in red are best-fit synthetic spectra
951: assuming a single excitation temperature for all three molecules.
952: All spectra have been shifted to the rest wavelengths.
953: }
954: \end{figure*}
955:
956: \clearpage
957:
958: \begin{figure}
959: \plotone{f2.eps}
960: \caption{\label{fig:mol_fit}%
961: Illustration of the temperature sensitivity of the C$_2$H$_2$ and
962: HCN $Q$-branch profiles in direct comparison to the observed spectra
963: of IC\,860 (best fit $T_{\mathrm ex}=280$\,K) and IRAS\,01003-2238
964: (best fit $T_{\mathrm ex}=630$\,K).
965: The shape of the $Q$-branch profile determines the derived
966: excitation temperatures with an uncertainty of $\sim30\%$.
967: A better constrained error
968: estimate is difficult to determine at the IRS resolution.
969: }
970: \end{figure}
971:
972: \clearpage
973:
974: \begin{figure*}
975: \plotone{f3.eps}
976: \caption{\label{fig:chem_model}%
977: Results of equilibrium X-ray enhanced chemical models for
978: the three observed molecules.
979: The calculated abundances are shown for moderate ($10^6\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$)
980: and high density ($10^8\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$) and four X-ray flux levels
981: ($F_{\mathrm X}=0$, $10^{-3}$, 1 and $10^3$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ plotted with
982: solid, dashed, dot-dashed, and long-dashed lines). Note that except
983: for HCN and CO$_2$ at high density, the abundances for the highest
984: X-ray flux are below the plotted range.
985: Overplotted are the observed abundances.
986: Details of the model can be found in \citet{stauber05,stauber06}.
987: }
988: \end{figure*}
989:
990: \clearpage
991:
992: \begin{figure*}[t]
993: \plotone{f4.eps}
994: \caption{\label{fig:abundances}%
995: Top: observed C$_2$H$_2$, HCN and CO$_2$ abundances using a total
996: H$_2$ column obtained from the $9.8\,\mu$m silicate absorption band.
997: Bottom: abundance ratios of C$_2$H$_2$, HCN and CO$_2$.
998: Both the absolute abundances and the abundance ratios are indicated with
999: circles and are presented
1000: as functions of excitation temperature. Included are the observed values
1001: toward a sample of Galactic massive YSOs \citep{boonman03,lahuis00}
1002: plotted with grey triangle symbols.
1003: The derived absolute abundances toward the (U)LIRGs show significant
1004: enhancements in the abundances of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN for sources with
1005: excitation temperatures below 500\,K. The C$_2$H$_2$/HCN abundance
1006: ratios are quite similar, however the CO$_2$/C$_2$H$_2$ and
1007: CO$_2$/HCN ratios toward the (U)LIRGs are systematically lower
1008: than toward the Galactic massive YSOs suggesting that a different
1009: chemistry may apply.
1010: }
1011: \end{figure*}
1012:
1013: \end{document}
1014: