1: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6:
7: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
8:
9: %% Use the following two lines for emulated ApJ style
10: %\documentclass{aastex}
11: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
12: %\usepackage{epsfig}
13: %\usepackage{longtable}
14: %\usepackage{graphicx}
15: %\usepackage{draftdate}
16:
17:
18: \newcommand{\ghz}{\hbox{$\ {\rm GHz}$}}
19: \newcommand{\pc}{\hbox{$\ {\rm pc}$}}
20: \newcommand{\h}{\hbox{$\ {h^{-1}}$}}
21: \newcommand{\kpc}{\hbox{$\ {\rm kpc}$}}
22: \newcommand{\mas}{\hbox{$\ {\rm mas}$}}
23: \newcommand{\masyr}{\hbox{$\ {\rm mas \ yr}^{-1}$}}
24: \newcommand{\ba}{\beta_{app}}
25: \newcommand{\n}{\nodata}
26: \newcommand{\rotm}{$\ \rm rad \ m^{-2}$}
27: \def\Ell{{\cal L}}
28:
29: \def\bi{\begin{itemize}}
30: \def\ei{\end{itemize}}
31: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
32: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
33: \def\bl{\medskip\medskip\item}
34: \def\Lsun{{\rm\,L_\odot}}
35: \def\Msun{{\rm\,M_\odot}}
36: \def\gtrsim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
37: \def\lesssim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
38: \def\gtrsim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
39: \def\lesssim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
40: \slugcomment{Draft \today}
41:
42: %\slugcomment{Accepted for publication in the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.}
43: \shortauthors{Cooper, Lister and Kochanczyk}
44: \shorttitle{MOJAVE - I. VLA 1.4 GHz Images}
45: %\received{2005}
46: %\accepted{2005}
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: \title{MOJAVE: Monitoring of Jets in AGN with VLBA Experiments. III. Deep VLA
50: Images at 1.4 GHz }
51:
52: \author{N. J. Cooper}
53: \affil{Department of Physics, Purdue University, 525 Northwestern
54: Avenue, West Lafayette, IN 47907}
55: \email{ncooper@physics.purdue.edu}
56:
57: \author{M. L. Lister}
58: \affil{Department of Physics, Purdue University, 525 Northwestern
59: Avenue, West Lafayette, IN 47907}
60: \email{mlister@physics.purdue.edu}
61:
62: \author{M. D. Kochanczyk}
63: \affil{Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin,
64: 1 University Station C1600, Austin, TX 78712}
65: \email{martin@physics.utexas.edu}
66:
67: \begin{abstract}
68:
69: The MOJAVE blazar sample consists of the 133 brightest, most compact
70: radio-loud AGN in the northern sky, and is selected on the basis of
71: VLBA 2 cm correlated flux density exceeding 1.5 Jy (2 Jy for
72: declinations south of 0$^\circ$) at any epoch between 1994 and 2003.
73: Since 1994 we have been gathering VLBA data on the sample to measure
74: superluminal jet speeds and to better understand the parsec$-$scale
75: kinematics of AGN jets. We have obtained 1.4 GHz VLA$-$A
76: configuration data on 57 of these sources to investigate whether the
77: extended luminosity of blazars is correlated with parsec$-$scale jet
78: speed, and also to determine what other parsec$-$scale properties are
79: related to extended morphology, such as optical emission line strength
80: and gamma$-$ray emission. We present images and measurements of the
81: kilo-parsec scale emission from the VLA data, which will be used in
82: subsequent statistical studies of the MOJAVE sample.
83:
84: \end{abstract}
85:
86: \keywords{
87: galaxies : active ---
88: galaxies : jets ---
89: quasars : general ---
90: radio continuum : galaxies ---
91: BL Lacertae objects : general ---
92: }
93: \
94: %\tableofcontents
95: \
96: \section{Introduction}
97:
98: Blazars are an extreme class of radio source that represent only a small
99: percentage of active galactic nuclei (AGN), yet dominate the sky at high
100: energies. They are characterized by highly relativistic jets that are
101: oriented toward us with a very small angle of incidence. This often
102: results in apparent superluminal jet motions that are caused by a Doppler
103: compression in the apparent time duration of signals from the source. This
104: creates an ideal set of circumstances for studying the kinematics of jets,
105: since many decades of evolution are often compressed into much shorter timescales.
106: MOJAVE (Monitoring of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments)
107: is a long term program that seeks to better understand the physics of AGN on the
108: parsec$-$scale via regularly$-$spaced, high resolution VLBA observations
109: (\citealt{K98, KL04, LM05}). The MOJAVE sample contains 133 sources satisfying
110: the criteria,
111: \bi
112:
113: \item J2000 Declination $>$ $-$20$^\circ$
114: \item Galactic latitude $|b| > 2.5^\circ$
115: \item VLBA 2 cm correlated flux density exceeding 1.5 Jy (2 Jy for declination
116: south of 0$^\circ$) at any epoch between 1994 and 2003.
117:
118: \ei
119: By selecting on the basis of compact flux density at a short wavelength, the
120: sample favors highly beamed relativistic jets (i.e., blazars). This makes it
121: well suited for quantifying the strong selection effects associated with blazar
122: samples \citep{LM97}.
123:
124: An important goal of the MOJAVE program is to gain a better understanding of
125: how AGN jets evolve from parsec to kiloparsec$-$scales. Parsec$-$scale jet
126: speed information on the sample is nearly complete (Lister et al., in
127: preparation), and a distinct upper envelope is seen in a plot of maximum
128: observed jet speed versus parsec$-$scale jet luminosity \citep{CE07}.
129: The shape of this envelope is suggestive of an intrinsic correlation between
130: jet speed and synchrotron luminosity. Early hydrodynamic models
131: (\citealt{BR74}) predict such behavior, and if verified, would prove useful for
132: constraining more recent numerical models of jet production that include full
133: magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) and general relativistic (GR) effects
134: (e.g., \citealt{KMS04}).
135:
136: The interpretation of the envelope is complicated by the fact that the apparent
137: luminosity of blazar jets is strongly affected by the bulk Doppler factor
138: ($\delta$), of the flow. The latter quantity is dependent on the Lorentz factor
139: and viewing angle of the jet, which also affect the apparent speed.
140: An alternate means of testing the intrinsic speed/luminosity correlation is to
141: compare the apparent jet speeds with extended (radio lobe) emission on
142: kiloparsec$-$scales. The extended emission is not appreciably beamed and is
143: well-correlated with the total jet power \citep{GEA88}.
144:
145: Several extended flux density surveys that include blazars have been carried
146: out with the VLA (e.g., \citealt{AU85, MBP93, C99, RS01}). However, none of
147: these samples were as large or complete as MOJAVE, and they lacked
148: parsec$-$scale kinematic information. In order to measure the relatively
149: weak extended radio emission in the presence of a strong, highly beamed blazar
150: core component, images with good angular resolution and very high dynamic range
151: are necessary. Although better resolution can be achieved at higher observing
152: frequencies, the extended emission becomes faint because of the steep spectral
153: index. We have therefore sought to obtain deep VLA$-$A configuration images of
154: the entire MOJAVE sample at 1.4 GHz, which represents a reasonable compromise
155: between angular resolution and sensitivity to extended emission. Here we
156: present images of 57 MOJAVE sources; data on the remaining objects (from the VLA
157: archive and other observations) will be presented in an upcoming publication.
158:
159:
160: \section{Observations}
161:
162: The observations were made with the VLA in the A configuration, which
163: yields a typical restoring beam of 1.5\arcsec (FWHM), at an observing
164: frequency of 1.4 GHz. To minimize the possible effects of radio
165: interference, and to improve the dynamic range, the data were recorded
166: in spectral line mode, with 8 channels per IF. Right$-$ and
167: left$-$hand circular polarization data at 1.36 GHz and 1.44 GHz were
168: each assigned to one of four IFs, each having bandwidth of 25 MHz. The
169: observations took place during filler time on six separate dates
170: between 2004 September 19 and 2004 November 24 (Table 1). To maximize
171: {\it(u,v)} coverage, two scans of approximately five$-$minutes
172: duration, separated in hour angle, were made on each source. Two
173: sources, 0059$+$581 and 0109$+$224, had less than 10 minutes
174: integration time, due to scheduling constraints. Data on three high
175: declination sources (0016$+$731, 1150$+$812, 1459$+$718) were not
176: analyzed due to poor {\it(u,v)} coverage.
177:
178:
179: Calibration of the data was performed in the AIPS \footnote{AIPS is copyrighted by
180: Associated Universities, Inc. using the GNU copyright form.} and Difmap
181: \footnote{DIFMAP was written by Martin Shepard at Caltech, and is part of the
182: Caltech VLBI software package.} packages. Initial phase calibration
183: was carried out in AIPS using the most compact sources observed during
184: each run, with further iterations of imaging and self-calibration done
185: on each source in DIFMAP. Careful attention was paid to image over the
186: entire extent of the VLA primary beam, in order to mitigate the
187: effects of fainter sources in the field on the dynamic range. This
188: procedure yielded typical r.m.s. noise levels of 0.14 $\mathrm{mJy \;
189: beam^{-1}}$ and dynamic ranges of $\sim 15 000:1$ (Figure 1). For each source,
190: the flux density of the core component
191: ($S_{core}$) was determined in AIPS by fitting a Gaussian component to the
192: image with JMFIT. The size of the fitted Gaussians (FWHM) were in close
193: agreement with the size of the restoring beam. The total flux density was
194: determined by summing the flux density within a box fitted around the extent
195: of the source. The extended flux density of the source was calculated using
196: $S_{ext}=S_{total}-S_{core}$. The r.m.s. noise was measured in a
197: blank sky region well away from the source. These values are listed in
198: Table 2, and the distribution of extended flux density values is shown
199: in Figure 2.
200:
201: The images of several sources (0202+149, 0212+735, 0552+398, 0642+449,
202: 1324+224, 1417+385 and 2209+238) required futher analysis to confirm
203: the presence of very faint extended emission. The core component was
204: subtracted from the data, and the residual image was inspected for
205: emission above 3 times the r.m.s. noise level. Extended emission was
206: found for all but two sources, 0642+449 and 2209+238. For these two
207: sources we set an upper limit on extended emission equal to three
208: times the r.m.s. noise. In these and all the other sources, we cannot
209: rule out the presence of low$-$level diffuse emission on larger
210: angular scales than the restoring beam, however.
211:
212: \section{Discussion}
213:
214: The sources in the MOJAVE sample appear highly core$-$dominated, since
215: they are selected on the basis of compact VLBA emission, and not total
216: (single$-$dish) flux. Indeed, nearly half of the objects we have
217: imaged have less than 50 mJy in extended emission at 1.4 GHz, and only
218: one source ($1222+216$) has $S_{ext} > S_{core}$. In Figure 3 we show
219: a histogram of the logarithm of core$-$to$-$extended luminosity ratio
220: (R$_{c}$). These values were K$-$corrected to the rest frame of each
221: AGN using redshifts from the NASA Extragalactic Database assuming
222: spectral indices of $\alpha = 0$ and $\alpha = -0.7 \quad (S \propto
223: \nu^\alpha)$ for the core and extended emission respectively. For
224: sources without redshift information, z = 1 was assumed. The shape of
225: the distribution is similar to that of another core$-$dominated AGN
226: sample studied by Murphy et al. (1993), with a broad peak centered at
227: $R_c \simeq 10$.
228:
229:
230: \section{Conclusions}
231:
232: We have obtained high$-$dynamic range VLA$-$A configuration images at 1.4 GHz
233: of 57 AGN in the MOJAVE sample as part of a project to investigate a
234: possible correlation between extended jet luminosity of blazars and
235: parsec$-$scale jet speed. We found extended emission above the $\sim$0.3 mJy
236: level in all but two sources. A more detailed analysis of the full MOJAVE
237: sample, using arcsecond$-$scale radio images from previous studies, the VLA
238: archive and other observations, will be presented in an upcoming paper.
239:
240: \acknowledgements
241: The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the other
242: members of the MOJAVE project team: Hugh and Margo Aller, Tigran
243: Arshakian, Steve Bloom, Marshall Cohen, Dan Homan, Matthias Kadler,
244: Ken Kellermann, Yuri Kovalev, Andrei Lobanov, Eduardo Ros, Rene Vermeulen,
245: and Tony Zensus.
246:
247: This research was supported by NSF grant 0406923-AST and the Purdue
248: Research Foundation, and made use of the following resources: The
249: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet
250: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under
251: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The
252: Very Large Array (VLA), which is operated by The National Radio
253: Astronomy Observatory (NRAO). The NRAO is a facility of the National
254: Science foundation, operated under cooperative agreement with
255: Associated Universities, INC.
256:
257: \begin{thebibliography}{}
258:
259: \bibitem[Antonucci \& Ulvestad(1985)]{AU85} Antonucci, R.,
260: \& Ulvestad, J.\ 1985, \apj, 294, 158
261:
262: \bibitem[Blandford \& Rees(1974)]{BR74} Blandford, R., Rees, M.
263: \ 1974, \mnras, 169, 395
264:
265: \bibitem[Cassaro(1999)]{C99} Cassaro, P.,
266: \ 1999, \aaps, 139, 601
267:
268: \bibitem[Cawthorne et al.(1993)]{CWR93} Cawthorne, T.~V., Wardle,
269: J.~F.~C., Roberts, D.~H., \& Gabuzda, D.~C.\ 1993, \apj, 416, 519
270:
271: \bibitem[Cohen et al. (2007)]{CE07} Cohen et al., 2007, \apj, in press
272:
273: \bibitem[Giovannini et al.(1988)]{GEA88} Giovannini et al.
274: \ 1988, \aap, 199, 73
275:
276: \bibitem[Kato, Mineshige \& Shibata(2004)]{KMS04} Kato, Y., Mineshige, S.,
277: \& Shibata, K. \ 2004, \apj, 605, 307
278:
279: \bibitem[Kellermann et al.(1998)]{K98} Kellermann, K. I., Vermeulen,
280: R. C., Zensus, J. A., Cohen, M. H. 1998, \aj, 115, 1295
281:
282: \bibitem[Kellermann et al.(2004)]{KL04} Kellermann et al., 2004, \apj, 609, 539
283:
284: \bibitem[Lister(2001)]{L01} Lister, M.~L.\ 2001, \apj, 562,
285: 208
286:
287: \bibitem[Lister \& Homan(2005)]{LM05} Lister, M.~L.~\&
288: Homan D.~C.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 1389
289:
290: \bibitem[Lister \& Marscher(1997)]{LM97} Lister, M.~L.~\&
291: Marscher, A.~P.\ 1997, \apj, 476, 572
292:
293: \bibitem[Murphy, Browne \& Perley(1993)]{MBP93} Murphy, D., Browne, I.,
294: Perley, R.\ 1993, \mnras, 264, 298
295:
296: \bibitem[Perley, R. A.(1982)]{P82}
297: Perley, R. A.\ 1982, \aj, 87, 859
298:
299: \bibitem[Rector, \& Stocke(2001)]{RS01} Rector, T. \& Stocke, J. \ 2001, \aj,
300: 122, 565
301:
302: \end{thebibliography}
303:
304: \clearpage
305:
306: \input{tab1.tex}
307: %\input{VLA_Obs_Table.tex}
308:
309: \input{tab2.tex} %Core Fluxes and Beam Info
310:
311:
312: \clearpage
313: \figcaption{1.4 GHz VLA$-$A configuration images of AGN in the
314: MOJAVE sample. Each panel contains a Stokes I parameter image of the
315: source, with contours in successive integer powers of two times the lowest
316: contour (see Table 2). A single negative contour equal in magnitude to
317: the lowest contour is indicated with dashed lines.}
318:
319: \figcaption{Distribution of 1.4 GHz extended flux density for 57 AGN in the MOJAVE sample.}
320:
321: \figcaption{Distribution of core$-$to$-$extended luminosity ratio (source frame) for 57
322: AGN in the MOJAVE sample.}
323:
324: \clearpage
325:
326: \begin{figure}
327: \plotone{f1a.eps}
328: \centerline{f1a.eps}
329: \end{figure}
330: \clearpage
331:
332: \begin{figure}
333: \plotone{f1b.eps}
334: \centerline{f1b.eps}
335: \end{figure}
336: \clearpage
337:
338: \begin{figure}
339: \plotone{f1c.eps}
340: \centerline{f1c.eps}
341: \end{figure}
342: \clearpage
343:
344: \begin{figure}
345: \plotone{f1d.eps}
346: \centerline{f1d.eps}
347: \end{figure}
348: \clearpage
349:
350: \begin{figure}
351: \plotone{f1e.eps}
352: \centerline{f1e.eps}
353: \end{figure}
354: \clearpage
355:
356: \begin{figure}
357: \plotone{f1f.eps}
358: \centerline{f1f.eps}
359: \end{figure}
360: \clearpage
361:
362: \begin{figure}
363: \plotone{f1g.eps}
364: \centerline{f1g.eps}
365: \end{figure}
366: \clearpage
367:
368: \begin{figure}
369: \plotone{f1h.eps}
370: \centerline{f1h.eps}
371: \end{figure}
372: \clearpage
373:
374: \begin{figure}
375: \plotone{f1i.eps}
376: \centerline{f1i.eps}
377: \end{figure}
378: \clearpage
379:
380: \begin{figure}
381: \plotone{f1j.eps}
382: \centerline{f1j.eps}
383: \end{figure}
384: \clearpage
385:
386: \begin{figure}
387: \plotone{f2.eps}
388: \centerline{f2.eps}
389: \end{figure}
390: \clearpage
391:
392: \begin{figure}
393: \plotone{f3.eps}
394: \centerline{f3.eps}
395: \end{figure}
396:
397: \end{document}
398: