1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %
3: %
4: \received{2005}
5: %\revised{}
6: %\accepted{}
7: %\articleid{START PAGE}{END PAGE}
8: %\paperid{}
9: %\ccc{}
10: %\cpright{}{}
11:
12: \shorttitle{GCRT~J1745$-$3009}
13: \shortauthors{Hyman et al.}
14:
15: \newcommand\src{\protect\objectname[]{GCRT~J1745$-$3009}}
16: \newcommand{\mjybm}{\mbox{mJy~beam${}^{-1}$}}
17: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km~s${}^{-1}$}}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20: \title{A Faint, Steep Spectrum Burst from the Radio Transient \src}
21:
22: \author{Scott D.~Hyman}
23: \affil{Department of Physics and Engineering, Sweet Briar College,
24: Sweet Briar, VA 24595}
25: \email{shyman@sbc.edu}
26:
27: \author{Subhashis Roy}
28: \affil{ASTRON, P.O. Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands.}
29: \email{roy@astron.nl}
30:
31: \author{Sabyasachi Pal}
32: \affil{National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Pune, India}
33: \email{spal@ncra.tifr.res.in}
34:
35: \author{T.~Joseph~W.~Lazio}
36: \affil{Remote Sensing Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC
37: 20375-5351}
38: \email{Joseph.Lazio@nrl.navy.mil}
39:
40: \author{Paul S.~Ray}
41: \affil{E.~O.~Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC
42: 20375-5352}
43: \email{Paul.Ray@nrl.navy.mil}
44:
45: \author{Namir E.~Kassim}
46: \affil{Remote Sensing Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC
47: 20375-5351}
48: \email{Namir.Kassim@nrl.navy.mil}
49:
50: \and
51:
52: \author{Sanjay Bhatnagar}
53: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Array Operations Center,
54: P.O. Box O,
55: 1003 Lopezville Road,
56: Socorro, NM 87801-0387}
57: \email{bhatnagar@nrao.edu}
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60: \src\ is a transient bursting radio source located in the direction of the
61: Galactic center. It was discovered in a 330~MHz VLA observation from
62: 2002 September 30--October 1 and subsequently rediscovered
63: in a 330~MHz GMRT observation from 2003 September 28 by Hyman et al.
64: Here we report a new radio detection of the source in 330~MHz GMRT data taken on
65: 2004 March 20. The observed properties of the
66: single burst detected differ significantly from those measured previously, suggesting
67: that \src\ was detected in a new physical state.
68: The 2004 flux density was $\sim$0.05 Jy,
69: $\sim$10$\times$ weaker than the single 2003 burst and $\sim$30$\times$ weaker than
70: the five bursts detected in 2002.
71: We derive a very steep spectral index, $\alpha = -13.5 \pm 3.0$,
72: across the bandpass, a new result previously not detectable due to limitations in the analysis of
73: the 2002 and 2003 observations.
74: Also, the burst was detected for only $\sim$2 min.,
75: in contrast to the 10 min. duration observed in the earlier bursts.
76: Due to sparse sampling, only
77: the single burst was detected in 2004, as in the 2003 epoch, and we cannot rule out additional undetected bursts that may have occurred with the same
78: $\sim$77 min. periodicity observed in 2002 or with a different periodicity.
79: Considering our total time on source throughout both our archival
80: and active monitoring campaigns, we estimate the source exhibits detectable
81: bursting activity $\sim$7\% of the time.
82:
83:
84: \end{abstract}
85:
86: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- radio continuum --- stars: variable: other}
87:
88: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
89:
90: %Transient radio emission has been detected from many astronomical
91: %sources including flare stars, brown dwarfs, masers, gamma ray bursts,
92: %pulsars, supernovae, neutron star and black-hole X-ray binaries, and
93: %active galactic nuclei.
94: %Efficient \emph{blind} searching for radio transients requires a
95: %telescope for which the product of the field of view~$\Omega$, the
96: %sensitivity or collecting area~$A$, and the ratio of the total
97: %observing time to the time resolution~$T/\delta t$ is ``large.''
98: %Generally, radio telescopes have been able to maximize only two of
99: %these three quantities. Thus, the majority of radio transients have
100: %been found by either monitoring objects thought to be potential radio
101: %emitters (e.g., flare stars and brown dwarfs) or by followup
102: %observations of objects detected at higher energies (e.g., X-ray
103: %binaries and gamma-ray bursts). Recent developments in low frequency
104: %imaging techniques have produced wide-field images ($\approx
105: %3\arcdeg$~FWHM) with uniform and high resolution across the field
106: %\citep{lklh00,nlkhlbd04} thereby enabling efficient searches for radio
107: %transients \citep{hlkb02,hlknn03}.
108:
109:
110: \src\ is a novel transient radio source \citep{hlkrmy-z05,hlrrkn06}, whose
111: notable properties have included ``bursts'' with approximately 1~Jy peak flux density
112: lasting approximately 10~min.\ each and occurring at apparently
113: regular 77~min.\
114: intervals. We first identified \src\
115: from archival~330~MHz (90~cm) observations taken with the Very Large Array (VLA)
116: on~2002 September~30. We then detected a single burst from the source with the Giant
117: Metrewave Radio
118: Telescope (GMRT) in archival observations from~2003 September~28 at the same frequency.
119: \src\ is located about~1.25\arcdeg\ south of the
120: Galactic center just outside (in angular distance) the shell-type
121: supernova remnant \objectname[]{SNR~G359.1$-$0.5} \citep{rf84}. The
122: environment of the source is discussed further in \cite{hlrrkn06}.
123:
124: The source \src\ is notable because it is one of a small number of
125: \emph{radio-selected} transients. Moreover, with only a few
126: exceptions \citep{m02} such as electron cyclotron masers from flare
127: stars and the planets, plasma emission from solar radio flares, pulsar
128: radio emission, and molecular-line masers, most radio transients are
129: incoherent synchrotron emitters. For an incoherent synchrotron
130: emitter, the energy density within the source is limited to an
131: effective brightness temperature of roughly $10^{12}$~K by the inverse
132: Compton catastrophe \citep{readhead94}.
133: The properties of \src\ suggest strongly that its brightness
134: temperature exceeds $10^{12}$~K by a large factor and that it is a
135: member of a new class of coherent emitters \citep{hlkrmy-z05}.
136:
137: The two previous detections of \src\ were based on VLA and GMRT 330~MHz observations from
138: two different epochs, but from which similar source properties were observed.
139: This \emph{Letter} reports on a third 330~MHz archival observation of \src, made with the
140: GMRT in 2004, in which a single, much fainter and shorter burst is detected in contrast
141: to the burst properties observed in 2002 and 2003. In addition, the burst is found to have a very steep spectrum, as expected for a coherent emitter, providing another important clue to understanding the nature of this enigmatic source.
142:
143: Possible models for \src\ include nearby objects such as a flaring brown
144: dwarf, flare star, or extra-solar planet, although, as discussed in
145: \cite{hlkrmy-z05}, the properties of the source do not easily fit these classes.
146: Alternative models proposed for \src\ thus far are a nulling pulsar (\cite{kp05}),
147: a double pulsar (\cite{tpt05}), a transient white dwarf pulsar
148: (\cite{zhanggil}), and a precessing radio pulsar (\cite{zhuxu}). As noted in
149: the latter paper, the double pulsar model predicts a $\sim$3-yr bursting
150: activity period which is not supported by the redetections in 2003 and 2004.
151: Furthermore, in \cite{hlrrkn06} we presented tentative evidence suggesting that the 2003 burst was
152: an isolated one, and not one of several bursts emitted at 77 min.
153: intervals, as observed in 2002.
154: This evidence could be problematic for some or all of
155: these models. For example, the proposed double pulsar
156: would link the radio emission to a 77 min. orbital period. In this model,
157: coherent radio emission is triggered by the shock formed through the interaction
158: of the wind of the more enigmatic pulsar with the magnetosphere of the companion pulsar.
159: On the other hand, in analogy to the PSR B1259-63 system which consists of a pulsar and Be star companion,
160: it is also possible that the magnetosphere of the companion is not constant, and therefore that
161: the radio bursts are not always triggered every orbit.
162: Indeed, the much fainter detection from \src\ reported in this \emph{Letter} could be
163: evidence of variable conditions in the environment around a companion star.
164:
165:
166: Similarly, the precessing radio pulsar and transient white dwarf pulsar models would also require one or more
167: types of nulling effects to explain the occurrence of isolated bursts in the short term,
168: as well as the low duty cycle in the long term. A few radio pulsars
169: are known to have a very large nulling fraction. PSR B1931+24 remains in an off state for $\sim$90\% of the time,
170: and it emits bursts quasi-periodically at $\sim$40 per day \citep{cordesetal04}.
171: Such a high nulling fraction may be consistent with the measured duty cycle estimated for \src.
172:
173:
174: %There are different models to explain the enigmatic features of GCRT J1745-3009. But still now, no final
175: % conclusion about the type and nature of the source is reached. It is possible that the source is a close by
176: % radio source (a flaring brown dwarf, a dwarf M type star or an extrasolar planet) and only coincidentally
177: % projected near the direction of Galactic Centre but as discussed in Hyman et al. (2005), the properties of
178: % GCRT J1745-3009 do not easily fit any of these classes. Turolla et al. (2005) modeled the system as double
179: % neutron star binary where the coherent radio emission comes from the shock originating in the interaction
180: % of the wind of the more enigmatic pulsar with the magnetosphere of the companion and the interval between
181: % the burst is due to the orbital period ($P\sim 77$ minute) of the system. Zhang and Gil (2005) has proposed
182: % the system to be a transient white dwarf pulsar with a period of $\sim$ 77 minutes and the $\sim$ 10 minute
183: % flaring duration corresponds to the epoch in which the radio beam sweep our line of sight. However, no pulsar
184: % like white dwarf is previously reported amongst the large population of white dwarfs observed.
185: % Zhu and Xu (2006) modeled the source as a precessing radio pulsar, precessing with a period of
186: %\sim 77$ min. with the precession angle larger ($\ge 15\arcdeg$) than any previously known precessing
187: % pulsars which have a precession angle $\le 10\arcdeg$, if the beam width of the pulsar is larger than
188: % $10\arcdeg$. The pulsar could be a nulling (or extremely nulling) radio pulsar (Kulkarni and Phinney (2005)),
189: % like PSR J1752+2359, to take care of the transient nature of the source. Some of the discovered radio pulsars
190: % are known to have a huge nulling fraction. PSR B1931+24 remains in off state for $\sim$90 per cent of time,
191: % and it appears quasi-periodically at $\sim 40$ day \citep{cordesetal04}. Such a high fraction of nulling may
192: % be consistent with the measured duty cycle estimated for GCRT J1745-3009. A detection of radio pulses from
193: % the position of the source will put further light on the nature of the source.
194:
195: %I guess my comments on what he's written are as follows:
196:
197: %Turolla et al.: I may be remembering wrong, but I have the sense that
198: %we're starting to get enough detections that the 77 min. periodicity
199: %may not be "robust." That is, sometimes the source shows it,
200: %sometimes it doesn't. If so, that would be problematic for this
201: %model if the radio emission is linked to an orbital period. (I
202: %suppose that one could invoke some kind of "quenching" of the
203: %emission. I think that the Turolla et al. model is similar to the PSR
204: %B1259-63 system, in which the pulsar orbits a Be star. If GCRT
205: %J1745-3009 is similar, the emission would occur when the neutron star
206: %is close to the companion, and depending upon how much material
207: %surrounded the companion, that would determine whether the shock is
208: %formed and radio emission produced.) I don't think a change in flux
209: %density or peak brightness for a burst affects this model, though. It
210: %could be that the strength of the shock depends upon the amount of
211: %material present (see my parenthetical comments above).
212: %
213:
214: %Zhang & Gil: Again, if the 77 min. periodicity is in trouble, this
215: %model would seem to be in trouble as well. There's no reason that the
216: %orbital period should change. Actually, I also don't understand why
217: %the source would be present only occasionally, though I suspect that
218: %one might invoke some kind of "nulling." I don't see that a change in
219: %flux density or peak brightness for a burst would affect this model.
220:
221: %Zhu & Xu: Again, why a precession period of a precessing radio pulsar
222: %would change from 77 min. is not clear or why the pulsar would not
223: %appear is not clear. I don't see that a change in the flux density or
224: %peak brightness for a burst would affect this model.
225:
226: %nulling pulsar: A change in flux density or peak brightness wouldn't
227: %affect this model. However, I don't understand this model. The flux
228: %density that we quote (~ 1.5 Jy) already would make this object one of
229: %the three brightest pulsars. Moreover, our observations make no
230: %corrections for dispersion smearing, meaning that the flux density we
231: %quote is a lower limit (potentially by a large amount). If we just
232: %take RRATs at face value, they have a duty cycle of something like
233: %1E-5 (< 1 s of emission in 1 day). The fact that this object has gone
234: %unnoticed in previous pulsar surveys (including the Parkes Multi-beam,
235: %from which RRATs were discovered), suggests that its duty cycle might
236: %be much, much lower.
237:
238:
239:
240:
241:
242: \section{Observations and Results}\label{sec:observe}
243:
244: The new, serendipitous detection reported in this paper is derived from 330
245: MHz GMRT Galactic center observations
246: obtained by two of us (S. Roy and S. Bhatnagar) as part of an unrelated
247: project and not included in \cite{hlrrkn06}. One of the observations,
248: from 2004 March 20-21, is pointed 0.5\arcdeg\ from \src\ and consists of
249: eleven 10 min. scans spread over six hours.
250: The observations were carried out using the default observing mode with a
251: bandwidth of 16 MHz in each of the two available sidebands. The sources
252: B1822-096 and B1714-25 were used as secondary calibrators. The GMRT does not
253: measure the system temperature ($T_{sys}$), and the increase in $T_{sys}$ from the
254: calibrator field to the target source affects the source visibility
255: amplitudes in the default observing mode (i.e., the Automatic Level
256: Control [ALC] in the system is turned on). We employed the following
257: method to correct for the $T_{sys}$ variation. As the system gain does not
258: change with the ALC off, we observed 3C48 and B1822-096 once with the ALC off and
259: determined the flux density of B1822-096 to be 10.8 Jy using the known flux density of
260: 3C48 from \cite{baarsetal77}. Also with the ALC off, we determined the ratio of the
261: total power on the target source to that of B1822-096 to be 1.8.
262: Since this ratio was quite similar (within 10\%) for almost
263: all the antennas, rather than correcting the antenna-based gains, we
264: multiplied the final map of the source intensity distribution by this
265: value. We estimate the overall calibration uncertainty to be within
266: $\pm$15\%. The initial images were improved by phase and later amplitude
267: and phase self-calibration. To produce the final image, separately
268: self-calibrated data from both the sidebands were combined to improve
269: the uv-coverage.
270:
271: We detect a $\sim$10$\sigma$ burst from \src\ in the middle of the first scan
272: beginning at approximately 21:31:00 (IAT) on March 20 and lasting for approximately 2 min. The source
273: is unresolved and has a flux density of 57.9$\pm$6.6 mJy.
274: As a check on the calibration, we find the flux densities of several bright sources in the field-of-view
275: to be consistent with those obtained in the 330 MHz VLA survey of the Galactic center by \cite{nlkhlbd04}.
276:
277: Over the past several years, we have conducted a 330 MHz search for radio transients in the Galactic
278: center \citep{hlkb02,hlknn03} using archival observations made between 1989 and the present,
279: and monitoring observations beginning in 2002.
280: \cite{hlrrkn06} summarize the VLA and GMRT observations and data reduction through 2005.
281: Most of these observations are pointed towards Sgr A* where the large primary beam at 330 MHz
282: (2.2\arcdeg [VLA] and 1.4\arcdeg [GMRT]) and high stellar density subtended optimize the
283: likelihood of
284: detecting a transient, including \src.
285: Our 2006 and 2007 monitoring program includes observations at 330 MHz (VLA) and simultaneous observations at
286: 235 and 610 MHz (GMRT); these will be described in a subsequent paper.
287:
288: The flux density of the detected 2004 burst is much fainter than the
289: $\sim$1~Jy peak flux density measured for
290: the five bursts detected in 2002 \citep{hlkrmy-z05} and for the one burst detected in 2003 \citep{hlrrkn06}.
291: Due to the relatively short and infrequent scans in the 2004
292: observations, we detect only a single burst, as in the 2003 epoch.
293: We cannot rule out the possibility that additional bursts were emitted at the same 77 min. interval
294: observed in 2002. We note, however, that nondetections in additional scans made at multiples of 77 min. after the detected 2003 burst, but in which \src\ is located well beyond the half power point of the primary beam, suggest that the 2003 detected burst is actually an isolated one \citep{hlrrkn06}.
295:
296: Figure~\ref{fig:lightcurve04} shows the light curves for all seven bursts
297: detected to date.
298: While only the $\sim$2~min. decay portion of the 2003 burst was detected due to its coincidence with the beginning of a scan,
299: the 2004 burst is sampled completely within one scan. It is detected for
300: only $\sim$2~min. compared with the $\sim$10~min. duration
301: observed for the bursts in 2002.
302:
303: % While the rise and/or decay portions of the
304: %2002 and 2003
305: %bursts are clearly visible in their light curves, significant variability in the
306: %2004 light curve is not evident. However, it is conceivable that the duration
307: %of the burst is actually much longer than $\sim$2~min., but that
308: %the rise
309: %and decay are too faint to detect.
310:
311: \src\ is unresolved in all three epochs.
312: The resolution for the 2004 epoch is approximately 20\arcsec\ $\times$ 10\arcsec,
313: comparable to the 2003 epoch, and approximately a factor of~2
314: better than in the 2002 epoch. A Gaussian fit to the 2004
315: detection yields a position of
316: (J2000) right ascension $17^{\mathrm{h}}$ $45^{\mathrm{m}}$ 5\fs09 ($\pm
317: 0\fs17$), declination $-30\arcdeg$ 09\arcmin\ 56.4\arcsec\ ($\pm 2\arcsec$),
318: which is consistent with the 2003 and 2002 positions and is approximately
319: 2.5$\times$ and 5$\times$ more accurate, respectively.
320: The source position and uncertainty cited above include
321: a correction for ionospheric refraction which is prevalent in low frequency observations and discussed in \cite{hlrrkn06} and \cite{nlkhlbd04}.
322:
323: Separate images were made for the upper (333 MHz) and lower (317 MHz) sidebands of the observations and yield flux densities of 42.1$\pm$7.2 mJy and 72.5$\pm$9.5 mJy, respectively. No significant differences are found in the shapes of the separate light curves generated for each sideband. Figure~\ref{fig:spectrum04} shows the spectrum of \src\ obtained by imaging pairs of adjacent frequency channels across the two sidebands. A power-law fit yields a very steep spectrum of $S \propto \nu^{-13.5 \pm 3.0}$ for \src.
324: An identical analysis of the data for the nearby strong source G358.638$-$1.160 yields a spectral index of $-1.5 \pm 0.5$, consistent with the
325: determination of \cite{nlkhlbd04} who found a spectral index
326: of~$-1.2$ between~330 and~1400~MHz.
327:
328: A Monte-Carlo simulation was conducted to assess the confidence level of the steep spectrum obtained for the 2004 detection of \src. First, a spectrum was generated based on the fitted spectral index of $-13.5$ and normalized to the observed flux density at a particular channel. One thousand spectra were simulated by randomly adding Gaussian noise to the flux densities of the normalized spectrum, based on the observed noise level obtained for the individual channel images.
329: A flat spectrum fit to the \src\ data is ruled out with a confidence
330: level of 99.7\%.
331: %The spectrum of the nearby strong source, G358.638-1.160, is also included in the %figure in order to demonstrate that there is no significant error in the bandpass %calibration during the time of the burst.
332: Unfortunately, however, due
333: to limitations in the analysis of the 2002 and 2003 observations, we were not able to detect reliable evidence of a steep spectrum for those bursts.
334:
335: %No frequency dependence was detected in the 2002 and 2003 bursts, and none is %detected
336: %across the 30-MHz bandpass for the 2004 burst.
337: %Similarly, a power law fit across the
338: %24-channel, 30-MHz bandpass
339: %for the 2004 March~20 burst yields a wavelength dependence of $S \propto %\lambda^{0.3 \pm 7.2}$.
340:
341: No emission is detected from \src\ when imaging the 2004 observation at times when the burst is not occurring.
342: From these 2004 observations, we are able to improve the
343: (5$\sigma$) upper limit for quiescent 330~MHz emission between
344: bursts to~6~mJy, as compared to earlier limits of~75~mJy and~25~mJy
345: from the 2002 and~2003 observations, respectively.
346: The upper limit on quiescent emission during
347: periods of no burst activity is 15~mJy at~330~MHz \citep{hlkrmy-z05}. In addition, we find an upper limit of 50\% circular polarization for the 2004 burst, while an upper limit of 15\% was previously determined for both the 2002 and 2003 bursts.
348:
349: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}\label{sec:Discussion}
350:
351: In \cite{hlrrkn06} we crudely estimated the activity of the bursting
352: behavior of \src\ by comparing the time during which the source is
353: observed to be active to the total amount of observing time. With the addition of
354: $\sim$40~hr of 330 MHz VLA observations analyzed in 2006, with no detection, the
355: total observing time is $\sim$120~hr. The 2002 September~30 - October~1
356: bursts lasted for at least 6~hr, and since only a single burst was
357: detected on~2003 September~28 and on 2004 March 20, we assume that the source was active
358: for~$\sim$1~hr in each of these epochs. Thus, \src\ has exhibited bursting activity approximately 7\% of the
359: time it was observed.
360:
361: The 2002 and 2003 detections of \src\ occured
362: in late September and the 2004 detection occurred in late March, suggesting
363: a roughly 6-month interval between active periods.
364: Although we find no detections in our 1998, 2002, 2005, and 2006 observations in March and September,
365: it is still possible that bursting activity did occur in these months but was either too
366: faint or lasted too short a time to be detected. Similarly,
367: while our database has many observations in 2002, 2003, and 2006, we did not monitor for transients nearly
368: as often in 2004 and 2005, and useful archival data is very limited in those
369: years.
370:
371: Since we have now detected \src\ in three significantly different observed states
372: ($\sim$1~Jy versus $\sim$50~mJy burst strengths,
373: $\sim$10~min. versus $\sim$2~min. burst durations, and regularly repeating versus
374: isolated bursts), future detections may yet exhibit additional properties
375: (e.g., emission in other frequency bands and polarized emission) that
376: will lead to a definitive understanding of the nature of \src.
377: Given the high variability in flux
378: density already detected, and the very steep spectrum of the 2004 burst, it is even conceivable that bursts
379: much stronger than $\sim$1~Jy will be detected at 330 MHz and lower frequencies, although it is also possible
380: that the bursts are now continually decreasing in strength at all frequencies.
381:
382: We note that all three detections
383: suggest strongly that \src\ is a coherent emitter, as first indicated in \cite{hlkrmy-z05}, and now even more so by the very steep spectrum reported here.
384: Although the 2004 burst is much weaker than the previous bursts
385: it also appears to have much shorter rise and decay times, $\tau$, as seen in Figure~\ref{fig:lightcurve04}.
386: If we constrain the emitting region to be less than c$\tau$, with $\tau$ $\sim$1-min, then the brightness temperature of \src\ is
387: $\sim 10^{12}K (D/150 pc)^{2}$, where $D$ is the distance to the source. If the source is at the Galactic center, $\sim$8.5~kpc
388: distant, its brightness temperature then still far exceeds the $10^{12}$K upper limit for an incoherent synchrotron emitter.
389:
390:
391: %However, since we have not yet detected \src\ at another frequency band and since the bandpass of our observations
392: %is not sufficiently wide, we cannot deduce whether or not the
393: %emission from the source follows the $S \propto \lambda^{6}$ dependence predicted for coherent emitters [ref?].
394:
395: %We also note here that the light curve of the 2004 burst, presented in
396: %Figure~\ref{fig:lightcurve04}, marginally shows
397: %a longer decay than rise time, which is opposite from that found in the previous
398: %bursts, and which if also detected in future observations, would also be an important
399: %variable in constraining models of the source emission.
400:
401:
402:
403: %\section{Conclusions}\label{sec:Conclusions}
404:
405: %We have summarized the first two detections (\cite{hlkrmy-z05}, \cite{hlrrkn06}) of the bursting transient source,
406: %\src, and reported a new
407: %detection in a Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope observation from 2004.
408: %We have now detected \src\ at 330 MHz at three epochs, 2002 September~30--October~1, and
409: %2003 September~28, and 2004 March~20.
410:
411: In summary, the new detection of \src\ consists of a single $\sim$50~mJy burst lasting only 2-min and exhibiting a very steep spectrum ($\propto \nu^{-13.5 \pm 3.0}$). The burst is
412: significantly weaker and shorter than the $\sim$1~Jy and 10-min. bursts detected
413: in 2002 and 2003. Like the 2003 detection, the single burst detected in 2004
414: appears to be an isolated one, although the sparse sampling of the observation
415: does not rule out the possibility that additional bursts were emitted at the
416: same 77 min. period observed in 2002 \citep{hlkrmy-z05}.
417: Given the $\sim$120 hrs of 330 MHz observations searched, we estimate that the
418: source is in a detectable bursting state $\sim$7\% of the time.
419:
420: Further, multi-wavelength observations are needed to better constrain the
421: physical nature of \src. Together with continued radio monitoring
422: for transient or weaker pulsed emission (e.g. pulsar-like), additional
423: desired observations include searches for quiescent or variable infrared or
424: X-ray counterparts.
425:
426:
427: \acknowledgements
428:
429: The National
430: Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science
431: Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
432: Universities, Inc.
433: We thank the staff of the GMRT that made these observations possible.
434: GMRT is run by the National Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata
435: Institute of Fundamental Research.
436: S.D.H.\ is supported by funding from Research Corporation and SAO \emph{Chandra} grants GO6-7135F and GO6-7038B. Basic research in radio
437: astronomy at the Naval Research Laboratory is supported by 6.1 base funding.
438:
439: \begin{thebibliography}{}
440: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Arzoumanian, Chernoff, \&
441: % Cordes}{Arzoumanian et al.}{2002}]{acc02}
442: % Arzoumanian, Z., Chernoff, D.~F., \& Cordes, J.~M.
443: % 2002, \apj, 568, 289
444: % %The Velocity Distribution of Isolated Radio Pulsars
445:
446: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Condon et al.}{1998}]{ccgyptb98}
447: % Condon, J.~J., Cotton, W.~D., Greisen, E.~W., Yin, Q.~F.,
448: % Perley, R.~A., Taylor, G.~B., \& Broderick, J.~J.
449: % 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
450:
451: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cornwell \& Perley}{1992}]{cp92}
452: % Cornwell, T.~J.\ \& Perley, R.~A. 1992, \aap, 261, 353
453:
454: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baars et al.}{1977}]{baarsetal77}
455: Baars, J.~W.~M., Genzel, R., Pauliny-Toth, I.~I.~K., \& Witzel, A.
456: 1977, \aap, 61, 99
457:
458: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cordes et al.}{2004}]{cordesetal04}
459: Cordes, J.~M., Lazio, T.~J.~W., McLaughlin, M.~A. 2004, New \ Astron. \ Rev., 48, 1459
460:
461: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Frail \& Kulkarni}{1991}]{fk91}
462: Frail, D.~A.\ \& Kulkarni, S.~R. 1991, \nat, 352, 785
463:
464: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gaensler et al.}{2004}]{gaensleretal04}
465: Gaensler, B.~M., van der Swaluw, E., Camilo, F., Kaspi, V.~M.,
466: Baganoff, F.~K., Yusef-Zadeh, F., \& Manchester, R.~N. 2004, \apj,
467: 616, 383
468:
469: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hyman et al.}{2006}]{hlrrkn06}
470: Hyman, S.~D., Lazio, T.~J.~W., Roy, S., Ray, P.~S., Kassim, N.~E.,
471: Neureuther, J.~L. 2006, \apj, 639, 348
472:
473: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hyman et al.}{2005}]{hlkrmy-z05}
474: Hyman, S.~D., Lazio, T.~J.~W., Kassim, N.~E., Ray, P.~S.,
475: Markwardt, C.~B., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 2005, \nat, 434, 50
476:
477: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hyman et al.}{2003}]{hlknn03}
478: Hyman, S.~D., Lazio, T.~J.~W., Kassim, N.~E., Nord, M.~E., \&
479: Neureuther, J.~L. 2003,
480: %A search for radio transients at 0.33 GHz in the GC
481: {Astron. Nachr.}, 324, 79
482:
483: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hyman et al.}{2002}]{hlkb02}
484: Hyman, S.~D., Lazio, T.~J.~W., Kassim, N.~E., \& Bartleson,
485: A.~L. 2002,
486: %Low-frequency radio transients in the galactic center
487: \aj, 123, 1497
488:
489: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kulkarni \& Phinney}{2005}]{kp05}
490: Kulkarni, S.~R. \& Phinney, E.~S. 2005, \nat, 434, 28
491:
492: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{LaRosa et al.}{2000}]{lklh00}
493: % LaRosa, T.~N., Kassim, N.~E., Lazio, T.~J.~W., \& Hyman,
494: % S.~D. 2000,
495: % %A wide-field 90 centimeter VLA image of the galactic center
496: % %region
497: % \aj, 119, 207
498:
499: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lyne \& Lorimer}{1995}]{ll95}
500: % Lyne, A.~G., \& Lorimer, D.~R. 1995, J.\ Astrophys.\ Astron.,
501: % 16, 97
502:
503: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Melrose}{2002}]{m02}
504: Melrose, D.~B. 2002,
505: %Coherent emission in AGN: a critique
506: Publ.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ Aust., 19, 34
507:
508: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Nord et al.}{2004}]{nlkhlbd04}
509: Nord, M.~E., Lazio, T.~J.~W., Kassim, N.~E., Hyman, S.~D.,
510: LaRosa, T.~N., Brogan, C.~L., \& Duric, N. 2004,
511: %High-resolution, wide-field imaging of the galactic center
512: %region at 330 MHz
513: \aj, 128, 1646
514:
515: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Readhead}{1994}]{readhead94}
516: Readhead, A.~C. 1994, \apj, 426, 51
517:
518: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reich \& F\"urst}{1984}]{rf84}
519: Reich, W.\ \& F\"urst, E. 1984, \aaps, 57, 165
520: %G357.7+0.3 and G359.1-0.5 - Two Shell-type Supernova Remnants in the Galactic Centre Region
521:
522: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Turolla, Possenti, \& Treves}{Turolla
523: et al.}{2005}]{tpt05}
524: Turolla, R., Possenti, A., \& Treves, A. 2005, \apj, 628, L49
525: press; astro-ph/0506199
526: % Is the Bursting Radio-source GCRT J1745-3009 a Double
527: % Neutron Star Binary?
528:
529: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Yusef-Zadeh, Hewitt, \&
530: % Cotton}{Yusef-Zadeh et al.}{2004}]{y-zhc04}
531: % Yusef-Zadeh, F., Hewitt, J.~W., \& Cotton, W. 2004, \apjs, 155, 421
532:
533: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zhang \& Gil}{2005}]{zhanggil}
534: Zhang, B. \& Gil, J. 2005, \apj, 631, L143
535:
536: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zhu \& Xu}{2005}]{zhuxu}
537: Zhu, W.~W. \& Xu, R.~X. 2005, \mnras, 365, L16
538:
539:
540: \end{thebibliography}
541:
542: %\clearpage
543:
544: %\begin{figure}
545: %\epsscale{0.45}
546: %\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f1.eps}}
547: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=6.0in]{Fig1.eps}
548: %\caption[]{Image of the Galactic center field at~330~MHz from the
549: %discovery observations on 2002 September~30 \citep{hlkrmy-z05}. The
550: %transient source \src\ is indicated by the small box below the
551: %approximately 20\arcmin\ diameter shell of
552: %\protect\objectname[]{SNR~359.1$-$00.5}. The resolution and
553: %sensitivity of the image are $48\arcsec \times 39\arcsec$ and
554: %15~\mjybm, respectively. \src\ appears as a 100~mJy source here since
555: %it is averaged over five, short ($\sim 10$~min.), roughly 1~Jy bursts
556: %out of a total of a 6-hr observation. Other sources in the field of
557: %view include the sources to the west which are part of
558: %\protect\objectname[]{Sgr~\hbox{E}}, the \protect\objectname[]{Snake}
559: %is the linear feature to the north, and the
560: %\protect\objectname[]{Mouse} is northeast of \src.}
561: %\label{fig:chart}
562: %\end{figure}
563:
564: %\begin{figure}
565: %\begin{center}
566: %\epsscale{0.45}
567: %\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f2a.ps}}\,
568: %\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f2b.ps}}\\
569: %\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f2c.ps}}
570: %\end{center}
571: %\caption[]{A 330~MHz VLA image of the field surrounding \src\ and the
572: %source Sgr~E~46 (at upper right in each image) made in 5-min.\
573: %intervals just before (top left), during (top right), and just after (bottom)
574: %the fourth burst detected in~2002 September~30. The fourth burst is
575: %shown because sampling of it is complete. Most of the bursts detected
576: %in this epoch were sampled only partially due to (unfortunately-timed)
577: %interruptions for phase calibration. The transient is located at the
578: %bottom left in the top right image. The contour levels are
579: %$-0.4$, 0.4, 0.7, 1.0, and~1.3~Jy~beam${}^{-1}$.}
580: %\label{fig:contour2002}
581: %\end{figure}
582:
583:
584: \begin{figure}
585: \epsscale{1.0}
586: \plotone{f1.eps}
587: \caption{The light curves of \src. The detected bursts from~2002 September~30
588: - October~1 are shown in panels a. - e. with 30-s
589: sampling \citep{hlkrmy-z05}. The single detected bursts from~2003
590: September~28 \citep{hlrrkn06} and~2004 March~20
591: (this \emph{Letter}) are shown in panels f. and g. with 17-s sampling
592: The y-axis ranges from 0 to 0.1~Jy and 0 to 1~Jy in the 2004 and 2003
593: panels, respectively, and from 0 to 2~Jy in the other
594: panels.
595: For the 2002 bursts, the light curve has been folded at the apparent
596: 77.1~min.\ periodicity. For the 2004 and 2003 bursts,
597: the light curves have been
598: aligned in time to be consistent with the peak and decay portions of
599: the 2002
600: bursts. In many cases, because the existence of
601: \src\ was not known at the time of the observation, the full burst is
602: not captured as the observations were interrupted for calibration or other targeted
603: observations. The 2004 March~20 and 2003 September~28 observations consisted of one or two
604: $\sim$10~min.\ scans per hour for several hours. The arrows represent 3$\sigma$ upper limits
605: for nondetections. The vertical dotted line is placed at the fitted position
606: of the peak of the fourth 2002 burst for reference.}
607: \label{fig:lightcurve04}
608: \end{figure}
609:
610: \begin{figure}
611: \epsscale{0.7}
612: %\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f2c.ps}}
613: %\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{gcrt.fie2.corr.spec.ps}}
614: \rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f2.eps}}
615: \caption{The spectra of \src\ and the nearby strong source,
616: G358.638$-$1.160. Pairs of adjacent channels were imaged across the 16 MHz
617: bandpasses of the upper and lower sidebands. The derived spectrum for \src\
618: is $S \propto \nu^{-13.5 \pm 3.0}$. In comparison, the spectrum of
619: G358.638$-$1.160 is far less steep but is consistent with that obtained by \cite{nlkhlbd04}, indicating no significant errors in the bandpass calibration. Note that the flux densities plotted for G358.638-1.160 are shown scaled down by $\times$2.}
620: \label{fig:spectrum04}
621: \end{figure}
622:
623:
624:
625:
626: \end{document}
627:
628: