1: %% LyX 1.4.3 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: \documentclass{emulateapj}
5: %\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
6: %\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
7: %\usepackage{graphicx}
8:
9: %\makeatletter
10:
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
12: \newcommand{\noun}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
13: %% Because html converters don't know tabularnewline
14: \providecommand{\tabularnewline}{\\}
15:
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
17: %% LyX 1.4.3 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
18: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
19:
20:
21:
22:
23:
24:
25: %\makeatletter
26:
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
28:
29: %% Because html converters don't know tabularnewline
30:
31:
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
33: %% LyX 1.4.3 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
34: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
35:
36:
37:
38:
39: %\usepackage{color}
40:
41:
42:
43:
44: %\makeatletter
45:
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
47:
48: %% Because html converters don't know tabularnewline
49:
50:
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
52:
53:
54:
55: %\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
56: %\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
57: %\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
58: %\usepackage{graphicx}
59:
60:
61:
62:
63:
64:
65:
66:
67:
68:
69:
70:
71:
72:
73: %\usepackage{rotating}
74:
75: %\usepackage{babel}
76:
77:
78: %\makeatother
79:
80:
81:
82: %\makeatother
83:
84:
85: %\usepackage{babel}
86: %\makeatother
87: \begin{document}
88:
89: \title{NGC~5011C: an overlooked dwarf galaxy in the Centaurus A group
90: \footnote{Based on observations made with ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Observatory}}
91:
92: \author{Ivo Saviane}
93:
94:
95: \affil{European Southern Observatory, A. de Cordova 3107, Santiago, Chile}
96:
97:
98: \email{isaviane@eso.org}
99:
100:
101: \and{}
102:
103:
104: \author{Helmut Jerjen}
105:
106:
107: \affil{Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National
108: University, Mt Stromlo Observatory, Cotter Road, Weston ACT 2611,
109: Australia}
110:
111:
112: \email{jerjen@mso.anu.edu.au}
113:
114:
115: \date{Received xxx; accepted xxx}
116:
117: \begin{abstract}
118: A critical study of the properties of groups of galaxies can be done
119: only once a complete census of group members is available. Despite
120: extensive surveys, even nearby groups can lead to surprises. Indeed
121: we report the discovery of a previously unnoticed member of the Centaurus~A
122: Group, NGC~5011C. While the galaxy is a well known stellar system
123: listed with a NGC number its true identity remained hidden because
124: of coordinate confusion and wrong redshifts in the literature. NGC~5011C
125: attracted our attention since, at a putative distance of $45.3$~Mpc,
126: it would be a peculiar object having a very low surface brightness
127: typical of a dwarf galaxy, and at the same time having the size of
128: an early-type spiral or S0 galaxy. To confirm or reject this peculiarity,
129: our immediate objective was to have the first reliable measurement
130: of its recession velocity. The observations were carried out with
131: EFOSC2 at the 3.6m ESO telescope, and the spectra were obtained with
132: the instrument in long-slit mode. The redshifts of both NGC~5011C
133: and its neighbor NGC~5011B were computed by cross-correlating their
134: spectra with that of a radial velocity standard star. We found that
135: NGC~5011C has indeed a low redshift of $v_{\odot}=647\pm96\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$
136: and thus is a nearby dwarf galaxy rather than a member of the distant
137: Centaurus cluster as believed for the past 23 years. Rough distance
138: estimates based on photometric parameters also favor this scenario.
139: As a byproduct of our study we update the redshift for NGC~5011B
140: at $v_{\odot}=3227\pm50\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$. Applying population
141: synthesis techniques, we find that NGC~5011B has a luminosity-weighted
142: age of $4\pm1$~Gyr and a solar metallicity, and that the luminosity-weighted
143: age and metallicity of NGC~5011C are $0.9\pm0.1$~Gyr and $1/5$
144: solar. Finally we estimate a stellar mass of NGC~5011C comparable
145: to that of dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the Local Group.
146: \end{abstract}
147:
148: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: individual: Cen\,A group -- galaxies: dwarf
149: -- galaxies: individual: NGC~5011B, NGC~5011C}
150:
151:
152: \section{Introduction}
153:
154: During a CCD imaging campaign with the 40-inch telescope at Siding
155: Spring Observatory carried out by one of us (HJ) in 1999, the galaxy
156: NGC~5011C only 7.7 arcmin away from the target galaxy ESO~269-G070
157: was falling into the $20\times20$\,sq\,arcmin field-of-view and
158: attracted the attention because of its morphological appearance resembling
159: closely that of a nearby dwarf elliptical galaxy. Most strikingly
160: the stellar system exhibits the featureless light distribution with
161: the characteristic low central surface brightness. However, a search
162: through the literature for more details about this galaxy suggested
163: a different picture. Based on its position in the sky and published
164: redshift measurements of over 3000\,km\,s$^{-1}$, NGC~5011C should
165: be a member of the distant Centaurus cluster. If true, the immediate
166: question arises what kind of galaxy this is with a physical size larger
167: than that of the neighboring Centaurus cluster member, the S0 galaxy
168: NGC~5011B, but with the stellar surface density of a low luminous
169: dwarf galaxy (see Fig.~1)?
170:
171: The galaxy NGC~5011C (ESO~269-G068) is located in the general direction
172: of the Cen\,A group and the Centaurus cluster. The nearby Cen\,A
173: group has a mean distance from the Milky Way of 3.7~Mpc (Jerjen,
174: Freeman \& Binggeli \citeyear{jerjen_etal00b}; Karachentsev et al.~\citeyear{karachentsev_etal06})
175: and a mean heliocentric velocity $\langle v_{\odot}\rangle=551$\,km\,s$^{-1}$
176: (C\^{o}t\'{e} et al.~\citeyear{cotge_etal97}). On the other hand,
177: the Centaurus cluster is $\approx12$ times further away at 45.3\,Mpc
178: (Mieske, Hilker \& Infante \citeyear{mieske_etal05}). Dickens, Currie
179: \& Lucey (\citeyear{dickens_etal86}) reported a redshift of 3195\,km\,s$^{-1}$
180: for NGC~5011C (galaxy \#531), consistent with the 3200\,km\,s$^{-1}$
181: from Fairall (\citeyear{fairall_83}), which immediately implies an
182: association with the Cen\,30 component of the Centaurus cluster that
183: has a mean velocity of $\approx3041$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (Lucey, Currie
184: \& Dickens \citeyear{lucey_etal86}). From its location, NGC~5011C
185: seems to form a physical pair with the other Centaurus cluster member,
186: the S0 galaxy NGC~5011B (ESO~269-G067), which is only 1.1\,arcmin
187: to the North (Fig.~1) and has a very similar redshift of 3294\,km\,s$^{-1}$
188: as reported by the same authors (galaxy \#530). However, despite the
189: small projected distance of only 14\,kpc there is no obvious optical
190: sign of interaction between the two.
191:
192: More confusion was added to the picture by the results from Dressler
193: (\citeyear{dressler_91}). The galaxy catalog listed a redshift only
194: for NGC~5011C (3293\,km\,s$^{-1}$, galaxy \#456) while no measurement
195: was reported for NGC5011B. This appeared somewhat strange as the central
196: surface brightness of NGC5011B is approximately four magnitudes higher
197: than that of NGC5011C making the former galaxy a more logical target
198: for a redshift measurement.
199:
200: The present paper reports on our spectroscopic and optical follow
201: up of the galaxy pair to shed more light on this confusing situation
202: around the two galaxies NGC5011B and C. In the next section we describe
203: our 3.6m observations and data reduction, and the age and metallicity
204: of the stellar populations dominating the galaxies light are determined
205: in \S3. The new recession velocities for the two galaxies are presented
206: in \S4 followed by a photometric analysis with a rough distance estimate
207: for NGC5011C in \S5 and a discussion in \S6.
208:
209:
210: \section{Spectroscopy}
211:
212: The observations were carried out with the ESO~3.6m telescope at
213: La Silla, during an EFOSC2 (Buzzoni et al. \citeyear{buzzoni_etal84})
214: technical night, with the purpose of testing all science and calibration
215: templates, and to estimate the photometric zero points and the grism
216: efficiencies. The {}``rotate to slit'' template was tested by putting
217: the nuclei of NGC~5011B and C into the same 1\,arcsec slit, and
218: taking $3\times1200$\,sec spectra. Before and after the galaxies'
219: observation, spectrophotometric standards were observed, and immediately
220: after the end of the last spectrum, $3\times1$\,sec spectra of a
221: radial velocity standard were also taken. Although several grisms
222: were tested during the night, for this particular set of data grism
223: \#11 was used, since it gives a good wavelength coverage and its intermediate
224: dispersion allows to obtain a good S/N for faint targets in relatively
225: short times. An observing log is listed in Table~\ref{tabcap:Journal-of-the}.
226: The radial velocity standard is HD125184 (from Udry et al.~\citeyear{udry_etal99}),
227: and the rest of the objects in the table are spectrophotometric standards
228: from Hamuy et al.~(\citeyear{hamuy_etal92,hamuy_etal94}).
229:
230: All reductions were carried out with the ESO-Midas data processing
231: system (e.g. Warmels \citeyear{warmels91}), and in particular within
232: the \noun{long} context, which provides commands to perform the standard
233: reduction steps of long-slit spectroscopy. A series of scripts were
234: written to facilitate as much as possible the batch reduction of several
235: spectra, and they are publicly available in the EFOSC2 instrument
236: pages. We first prepared the system to reduce the night spectra, using
237: the afternoon calibrations: the frames were rotated to have the wavelength
238: increasing along the CCD rows, a median bias frame was created and
239: subtracted from the rest of the frames, and a normalized flat-field
240: was also generated. To do this, five flat-fields taken with slit $1\farcs0$
241: were median combined, and then a two-dimensional polynomial was fitted
242: to the resulting image: the polynomial had degree 6 along the dispersion
243: axis, and it was constant along the spatial direction. This artificial
244: image was subtracted from the median flat, thus removing the lamp
245: continuum and leaving only the pixel-to-pixel variation. The wavelength
246: solution was established with a HeAr arc spectrum taken with the $1\farcs0$
247: slit. A database of wavelength solutions for each EFOSC2 grism is
248: also published in the instrument web pages, so by using the appropriate
249: guess session for grism \#11 it was straightforward to get the solution
250: for the current data set. After searching the master arc for emission
251: lines, and after defining a two-dimensional grid of points distributed
252: on the arc ridge lines, the grid was fitted with a two-dimensional
253: polynomial, with degree 3 along the dispersion axis, and degree 2
254: along the spatial direction, which is enough to correct the curvature
255: of the arc lines. The r.m.s. error of the wavelength solution is $0.26$~\AA,
256: and the calibrated spectra cover the range 3383 to 7505 \AA\ with
257: a dispersion of 4.23 \AA/pix. The width of the arc lines at 5000
258: \AA\ is $\approx13.3$~\AA, so a velocity measurement based on
259: a single spectral line has a 1-sigma error of $\approx340\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$.
260:
261: During the night, after a new spectrum was taken, it was reduced using
262: the calibration data prepared above: it was rotated and trimmed, bias-subtracted
263: and flat-fielded, and the wavelength calibration was applied, which
264: transforms the bidimensional frames from the pixel $(x,y)$ space
265: to the $(\lambda,s)$ space, where $s$ is the spatial direction after
266: correction for the distortion introduced by the grism. The one-dimensional
267: spectra were extracted with a simple average over the rows covered
268: by the profile, and then multiplied by the number of rows. The extraction
269: window was defined by inspecting the spatial profile of the spectra,
270: and taking the rows were the spectrum was significantly brighter than
271: the background. Prior to the extraction, the sky background was subtracted
272: from each frame: two template sky spectra were defined in two windows
273: preceding and following the target spectrum, and the sky background
274: at the position of the target was defined by a linear interpolation
275: between these two spectra.
276:
277: The spectrophotometric standard LTT~3218 was used to define the response
278: function of the grism: in this case the spectrum was extracted using
279: a very wide window and then compared to the spectrum published by
280: Hamuy et al.~(\citeyear{hamuy_etal92}). The spectra were flux-calibrated
281: by first normalizing by their exposure time and then dividing by the
282: response function. Prior to this, they were corrected for atmospheric
283: extinction using the average curve at La Silla. The fully reduced
284: and calibrated spectra of the two galaxies are shown in Fig.~\ref{figcap:The-flux-calibrated-spectra}.
285:
286:
287: \section{Ages and metallicities}
288:
289: The spectral energy distribution (SED) of NGC~5011B is obviously
290: redder than that of NGC~5011C, but a more quantitative comparison
291: of these two spectra is not possible, since the slit was aligned along
292: the two galaxy centers, and not along the parallactic angle. To overcome
293: this problem, we started from the fact that NGC~5011B is classified
294: as an S0 galaxy (Lauberts \citeyear{lauberts_82}). Looking at Fig.~1
295: of Zaritsky et al. (\citeyear{zaritsky_etal95}) one can see that
296: the SEDs of this class of galaxies are rather uniform, so by selecting
297: a template spectrum and comparing it to our observed one, we can estimate
298: the degree of loss of blue flux induced by the differential atmospheric
299: refraction. Zaritsky et al. used the spectral atlas of Kennicutt (\citeyear{kennicutt92}),
300: which includes five S0 galaxies. We chose NGC~3245 since, compared
301: to the other templates, it has no emission lines, its SED is not rising
302: in the blue, it extends to redder wavelengths, and it has better spectral
303: resolution. By dividing the NGC~5011B spectrum by the template (redshift
304: corrected), a correction function was found, which is smoothly declining
305: from red to blue, reaching at $3400$~\AA\ $60\%$ of the value
306: at $7500$~\AA. In other words, $40\%$ of the blue flux was lost
307: during the observation. The trend of the correction is well fit by
308: a straight line, which was then used to compute the intrinsic SEDs
309: of the two galaxies. The corrected spectra are shown in Fig.~\ref{figcap:The-flux-calibrated-spectra}
310: together with the original ones, and after normalizing their fluxes
311: to unity at $6000$~\AA. The original spectra of NGC~5011B and
312: NGC~5011C have fluxes reaching a maximum of $1.5\times10^{-15}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~sec$^{-1}$~\AA$^{-1}$
313: in the $R$ band and $0.06\times10^{-15}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~sec$^{-1}$~\AA$^{-1}$
314: in the $B$ band, respectively. In the $R$ band, NGC~5011C is four
315: magnitudes fainter than NGC~5011B.
316:
317: A first check of the correctness of our SEDs can be done by using
318: them to perform synthetic broad-band photometry in order to compute
319: colors, and then comparing the result to that obtained with our direct
320: imaging. To compute synthetic colors, a stellar A0I template was taken
321: from Jacoby et al. (\citeyear{jacoby_etal84}) library, and instrumental
322: magnitudes and color were computed by integrating it within the Johnson
323: $B$ and $V$ filter passbands from Bessell (\citeyear{bessell05}).
324: A zero-point correction was then computed, to calibrate the color
325: to the standard Johnson system; the color of an A0I star ($B-V=-0.01$)
326: was taken from Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (Cox \citeyear{allen}).
327: By repeating this procedure with the two galactic SEDs as input, we
328: found $B-V=0.95$ and $B-V=0.47$ for NGC~5011B and NGC~5011C, respectively.
329: The spectrum of NGC~5011C has been extracted in the central $5\farcs3$,
330: and in Fig.~\ref{fig:sbprofiles} one can see that $(B-V)\approx0.4\pm0.08$
331: at the center of the galaxy (see below). The synthetic color is thus
332: in good agreement with that obtained from broad-band surface photometry,
333: which means that our correction indeed yields a reliable SED.
334:
335: After this consistency check, we can interpret the two SEDs using
336: population synthesis techniques. For that purpose we used GALAXEV
337: from Bruzual \& Charlot (\citeyear{bc03}; BC03), to estimate the
338: luminosity-weighted age and metallicity. A grid of model SEDs were
339: generated, based on the Padova 1994 tracks (see BC03 for the references)
340: with an input Salpeter stellar mass function. Computations were done
341: for ages ranging from $0.1$~Gyr to $20$~Gyr, and for five of the
342: available metallicities $Z=0.0001$, $0.0004$, $0.004$, $0.008$,
343: and $0.02$. The age was increased in steps of $0.1$~Gyr up to $1$~Gyr,
344: and in steps of $1$~Gyr for older ages, and the spectra were degraded
345: to our instrumental resolution with software provided by BC03. The
346: best-fit was searched by minimizing the difference between model and
347: observed SEDs. In this way we found that the best solution is obtained
348: for an age of $0.9\pm0.1$~Gyr and $Z=0.004$ for NGC~5011C, and
349: for an age of $4\pm1$~Gyr and $Z=0.02$ for NGC~5011B.
350: %
351: % Added in final version
352: %
353: In the BC03 scale the metallicity of the Sun is $Z=0.02$, so the
354: two metallicities are $1/5$ solar and solar, respectively.
355: % %%%%%%%
356: The good
357: match between the theoretical and observed SEDs can be checked in
358: Fig.~\ref{figcap:The-flux-calibrated-spectra}. Note that these results
359: only apply to the central regions of the two galaxies; for example
360: the NGC~5011C spectrum was extracted in the central $5\farcs3$,
361: %%
362: %% changed for final version
363: %%
364: %% which correspond to $\sim130$--$260$~pc at the estimated distance
365: which correspond to $95$~pc at the estimated distance
366: of the galaxy (see below). The age and metallicity thus represent
367: the central stellar population only, and since the rest of the galaxy
368: has redder colors presumably it hosts older populations, as is evident
369: from Fig.~\ref{fig:sbprofiles}. Indeed a kind of tiny, whiter, bulge-like
370: core can be seen in Fig.~\ref{figcap:EFOSC2-true-color-image} as
371: well.
372:
373: The total $V$ magnitude computed in \S\ref{sec:Surface-Photometry}
374: allows us to estimate the mass of NGC~5011C as well. At a fiducial
375: distance of $3.7$~Mpc it converts into $M_{V}\sim-13.9$, and assuming
376: $M_{V}^{\odot}=4.7$, the total luminosity can be computed. Finally,
377: from Fig.~1 of BC03 one can estimate that, for an age of $1$~Gyr,
378: %% changed for the final version
379: %%
380: %% the mass-to-light ratio is $M/L_{V}\approx0.4$, so the mass of the
381: the mass-to-light ratio is $M/L_{V}\approx0.3$, so the mass of the
382: %% galaxy is $M\sim10^{7}M_{\odot}$. This value of the mass is only
383: galaxy is $M\sim 8 \times 10^{6}M_{\odot}$. This value of the mass is only
384: valid in the single age approximation, but it's very likely that the
385: SFH of the galaxy is more extended, so realistically that mass represents
386: only a lower limit. But even with this caveat, the stellar mass is
387: in the regime of that of dwarf galaxies.
388:
389:
390: \section{Recession velocities of NGC 5011B and C}
391:
392: \label{sec:Recession-velocities-of}
393:
394: A brief inspection of the prominent Balmer lines in the spectra (see
395: Fig.~\ref{figcap:The-flux-calibrated-spectra}) quickly reveals that
396: the two galaxies must have quite different redshifts in contrast to
397: what has been reported in the literature. An initial estimate of the
398: recession velocities can be obtained by measuring the central wavelength
399: of one of these lines. For example, the center of H$\beta$ is at
400: $4915$\AA\ in the NGC~5011B spectrum but at $4873$\AA\ in the
401: NGC~5011C spectrum (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:The-upper-two}). This
402: translates into a velocity of $3290\pm340\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$ for
403: NGC~5011B while that of NGC~5011C would be $750\pm340\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$,
404: where the error is the minimum uncertainty estimated above at $\sim5000$\AA.
405: To compute more precise velocities, we cross-correlated our spectra
406: with that of the radial velocity standard HD125184, thus obtaining
407: the relative velocity of each galaxy with respect to that of the standard
408: star. If we call this relative velocity $\Delta v^{{\rm gal}}$, then
409: the true heliocentric velocity of the galaxy is\[
410: v_{\odot}^{{\rm gal}}=\Delta v^{{\rm gal}}+v_{\odot}^{{\rm std}}+\delta v_{\odot}^{{\rm gal}}-\delta v_{\odot}^{{\rm std}}\]
411: where $\delta v_{\odot}$ is the heliocentric correction listed in
412: Table~\ref{tabcap:Journal-of-the}, and the heliocentric velocity
413: of the standard star is $v_{\odot}^{{\rm std}}=-12.40\pm0.05\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$.
414: From the same table, one can see that $\delta v_{\odot}^{{\rm gal}}-\delta v_{\odot}^{{\rm std}}=-3.7\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$,
415: where the individual heliocentric corrections have been computed using
416: \noun{iraf}'s task \noun{rvcor}. The cross-correlation of the spectra
417: has been done using \noun{iraf}'s task \noun{fxcor}. To improve the
418: signal, the spectra were first trimmed to $3900-6700$\AA\
419: and then continuum-normalized, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:The-upper-two}.
420: Additionally, in the case of NGC~5011C the region containing H$\gamma$
421: and the G band was masked out before cross-correlating the two spectra:
422: the two features are located close to each other at our spectral resolution
423: and as H$\gamma$ is basically absent in the RV standard spectrum,
424: the algorithm would overestimate the velocity as it attempts to correlate
425: H$\gamma$ in the galaxy spectrum with the G band in the standard
426: star spectrum. Masking the two spectra accordingly removed the confusion
427: leading to a more realistic velocity estimate with a reduced measurement
428: error. At the end of this analysis we get $\Delta v^{{\rm NGC5011B}}=3243\pm50\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$
429: and $\Delta v^{{\rm NGC5011C}}=663\pm96\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$, so
430: the heliocentric velocities are $v_{\odot}=3227\pm50\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$
431: and $v_{\odot}=647\pm96\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$ for NGC~5011B and
432: NGC~5011C, respectively.
433:
434:
435: \section{Surface Photometry \label{sec:Surface-Photometry}}
436:
437: To gain insight into NGC5011C's colors and photometric parameters,
438: shallow broad-band B, V, and R frames of 90s, 60s, and 30s integration
439: time, respectively, were acquired with the EFOSC2 instrument during
440: the same observing night (see Table~\ref{tabcap:Journal-of-the}).
441: A montage image is shown in Fig.~\ref{figcap:EFOSC2-true-color-image}.
442: The two galaxies have similar angular size, but they are of entirely
443: different morphological type. NGC~5011B is a classical lenticular
444: (S0) galaxy seen almost edge-on, while NGC~5011C appears as a low
445: surface brightness, early-type system with a uniform color and a hint
446: of a tiny nucleus or central star concentration.
447:
448: Continuous MeteoMonitor measurements of the atmospheric conditions
449: at La Silla observatory showed that the extinction RMS was less than
450: 0.02~magnitudes indicating that the sky transparency was good. From
451: 9--11 measurements spread in time the photometric zero points for
452: the three passbands were calculated: ZP(B)$=26.06\pm0.07$, ZP(V)$=26.12\pm0.03$,
453: and ZP(R)$=26.19\pm0.04$. The pre-reduction of the raw CCD frames
454: was carried out within MIDAS in the usual manner. After the bias subtraction,
455: pixels that do not respond linearly to flux were replaced by a median
456: of the surrounding area, using the latest EFOSC2 bad pixel mask, and
457: then each science frame was flattened using high signal-to-noise sky
458: flats. All reduced frames were flat to less than 0.08\%. The sky level
459: was determined from star-free regions well away from the galaxies.
460: Then foreground stars and background galaxies were removed from the
461: images to allow uncontaminated photometric measurements using procedures
462: written within the IRAF package. Stars in the vicinity of NGC5011C
463: were replaced by small patches of empty sky. The area underneath the
464: neighbor galaxy NGC5011B was restored using a rectangular sub-image
465: from the opposite side of the galaxy. The center of NGC5011C was given
466: by the intensity-weighted centroid.
467:
468: The galaxy flux was integrated using circular apertures on the clean
469: $BVR$ images to produce growth curves as a function of the geometric
470: radius $r=(ab)^{1/2}$ (where $a$ and $b$ are the major and minor
471: axis). The total magnitude $m_{T}$ was determined by extrapolation
472: to the asymptotic intensity, and the effective radius $r_{{\rm eff}}$
473: was defined as the value at which the intensity reached half of $m_{T}$.
474: Within $r_{{\rm eff}}$ the mean surface brightness $\langle\mu\rangle_{{\rm eff}}$
475: was also computed. These photometric parameters are listed in Table
476: \ref{photdata}. Surface brightness profiles in the three bands and
477: extinction-corrected colour gradients (B--R)$_{0}$, (V--R)$_{0}$,
478: and (B--V)$_{0}$ are shown in Figure \ref{fig:sbprofiles}. Thereby
479: we used the extinction values A$_{B}=0.503$, A$_{V}=0.386$, and
480: A$_{R}=0.311$ from Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis (\citeyear{schlegel_etal98}).
481: Additionally, S\'{e}rsic parameters were measured by fitting a S\'{e}rsic
482: model (S\'{e}rsic \citeyear{sersic_68}): \[
483: \mu(r)=\mu_{0}+1.086\,(r/r_{0})^{n}\]
484: to the observed profiles. These model parameters are also listed
485: in Table~\ref{photdata} and the corresponding model curves superimposed
486: onto the surface brightness profiles in Fig.~\ref{fig:sbprofiles}.
487: The quoted uncertainties include formal errors owing to the sky background
488: removal, photometric uncertainty and the fit to the surface brightness
489: profile. The total magnitudes are in good agreement with the values
490: published in the ESO-Uppsala catalogue (Lauberts \& Valentijn \citeyear{luberts_valentijn89}).
491:
492: Although the current imaging data is not deep enough to measure an
493: accurate distance for NGC5011C by means of the surface brightness
494: fluctuations method (e.g.~Jerjen et al.~\citeyear{jerjen_etal01})
495: we can make a guess at the distance interval in which NGC5011C is
496: likely to be found with the help of the two independent quantities
497: $\langle\mu\rangle_{{\rm eff}}$ and $n$ if we accept the galaxy
498: to be of early-type morphology.
499:
500: (A) The $\langle\mu\rangle_{{\rm eff}}-m_{B}$ relation for early-type
501: dwarf galaxies in the Virgo cluster (Binggeli \& Cameron \citeyear{binggeli_cameron91})
502: predicts an apparent B magnitude of $15.5\pm1.5$\,mag for a galaxy
503: like NGC5011C with an extinction-corrected mean effective B surface
504: brightness of $\langle\mu\rangle_{{\rm eff}}^{0}=22.94$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$
505: at the Virgo distance. Employing the latest cluster distance modulus
506: of $(m-M)_{{\rm Virgo}}=31.05$\,mag (Jerjen, Binggeli \& Barazza
507: \citeyear{jerjen_etal04}, Mei et al.~\citeyear{mei_etal06}) this
508: translates into an absolute magnitude of $M_{B}=-15.55\pm1.5$\,mag.
509: Combining that number with the apparent B magnitude in Table \ref{photdata}
510: we infer a distance modulus of $(m-M)=m_{B}-A_{B}-M_{B}=29.85\pm1.5$\,mag
511: or a distance range of 4.7--18.6\,Mpc.
512:
513: (B) As an alternative, we can use the S\'{e}rsic parameter $n$ that
514: controls the overall shape of a galaxy to estimate the distance interval.
515: Equation (6) from Binggeli \& Jerjen (\citeyear{binggeli_jerjen98})
516: that describes the $\log(n)-m_{B}$ relation for early-type dwarfs
517: in the Virgo cluster predicts an apparent B magnitude of $m_{B}=16.29\pm0.92$
518: mag for NGC5011C at the Virgo distance. Using the same cluster distance
519: modulus as before yields an absolute magnitude of $-14.76\pm0.92$
520: mag, a galaxy distance modulus of $29.06\pm0.92$\,mag, and a distance
521: range of 4.3--9.9\,Mpc.
522:
523: The main conclusion we can draw from these estimates based on photometric
524: properties is that the derived distance intervals are consistent with
525: NGC5011C being a member of the Cen\,A Group at 3.7\,Mpc (Jerjen,
526: Freeman \& Binggeli 2000; Karachentsev \citeyear{karachentsev05})
527: but incompatible with the Centaurus cluster distance of 45.3\,Mpc
528: (Mieske, Hilker \& Infante \citeyear{mieske_etal05}).
529:
530:
531: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
532:
533: The deep spectroscopy and shallow imaging with the 3.6m ESO telescope
534: has confirmed a new member of the nearby Cen\,A Group whose true
535: identity remained hidden because of coordinate confusion and wrong
536: redshifts in the literature since 23 years. The galaxy's morphology
537: provided the deciding clue. NGC~5011C is only 2.25 degrees to the
538: West of the dominant group galaxy NGC~5128 (Centaurus~A). Adopting
539: a mean group distance of 3.7\,Mpc this angular separation translates
540: into 150\,kpc. The two galaxies have also comparable velocities with
541: $v_{\odot}=647\pm96\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$ for NGC~5011C and $v_{\odot}=547\pm5\,{\rm km\, sec}^{-1}$
542: for NGC~5128. The sky distribution of all known group members in
543: the vicinity of NGC~5128 is shown in Fig.~\ref{figcap:distribution}.
544: Heliocentric velocities and distances taken from the literature (Jerjen,
545: Binggeli \& Freeman \citeyear{jerjen_etal00a}; Karachentsev \citeyear{karachentsev05};
546: Karachentsev et al.~\citeyear{karachentsev_etal06}) are given in
547: parentheses.
548:
549: NGC~5011C is well within the velocity distribution of the Cen~A
550: group, and it is definitely not compatible with the velocity distribution
551: of the Centaurus cluster. The Cen~30 component of the cluster has
552: a velocity dispersion of $\sigma_{v}=586$~km~sec$^{-1}$, so NGC~5011C's
553: velocity is $4\,\sigma$ lower than the cluster's average. Although
554: very high peculiar velocities can be observed in galaxy clusters,
555: this is not the case for the Centaurus cluster, and all its members
556: have velocities greater than $1500$~km~sec$^{-1}$ (see Fig.~3
557: in Lucey et al. \citeyear{lucey_etal86}).
558:
559: At 3.7\,Mpc, NGC~5011C has an absolute blue magnitude of $M_{B}=-13.54$\,mag
560: that makes it the 8th brightest member of the group comparable in
561: luminosity to ESO~269-066 and ESO~384-016. In terms of photometric
562: properties such as the overall (B--R)$_{0}$ color and the S\'{e}rsic
563: parameters the galaxy resembles closely the intermediate type (dS0/Im)
564: dwarf ESO~384-016 (see Table 2 of Jerjen, Binggeli \& Freeman \citeyear{jerjen_etal00a}).
565:
566: NGC~5011C has a bluer global appearance ($\langle$B--R$\rangle_{0}\approx1.1$\,mag)
567: than NGC~5011B but unlike for instance the blue LSB galaxy UGC~5889
568: (Vallenari et al.~\citeyear{vallenari_etal05}) it shows no sign
569: of on-going star formation neither in the 2D image (e.g.~young star
570: clusters, \ion{H}{2} regions) nor in our 1D-spectrum (emission lines).
571: Our estimated age of $0.9$~Gyr for the central stellar population,
572: and the presumably older disk, is compatible with this scenario, since
573: much younger stars would be needed to ionize any existing gas.
574:
575: NGC~5011C is neither a compact blue dwarf nor does it exhibit an
576: irregular stellar distribution or spiral arms. Optically, the galaxy
577: has smooth, symmetric isophotes suggesting a classification as dwarf
578: elliptical or intermediate (dE/Im) type galaxy.
579:
580: A look at the 21\,cm spectrum from the {H}\textsc{i} Parkes All-Sky
581: Survey (Barnes et al.~\citeyear{barnes_etal01}) observed in the
582: direction of NGC~5011C gives the impression of some emission at the
583: optical velocity (see Fig.~\ref{figcap:HIPASS}). However, the periodic
584: baseline structure in the velocity range 150\,km\,s$^{-1}<cz<1500$\,km\,s$^{-1}$
585: makes it impossible to draw a final conclusion on the possible presence
586: or absence of \ion{H}{1} in NGC~5011C. At the tentative distance
587: of 3.7\,Mpc a non-detection corresponds to an upper limit of $M_{{\rm HI}}\sim1.4\times10^{7}\, M_{\odot}$
588: which is still a factor of 2.5 higher than the {H}\textsc{i} mass
589: of $(6.0\pm0.5)\times10^{6}\, M_{\odot}$ detected in ESO~384-016
590: (Beaulieu et al.~\citeyear{beaulieu_etal06}). For a most recent
591: list of \ion{H}{1} detections and upper limits in Cen A group dwarf
592: galaxies see Bouchard et al. (\citeyear{bouchard_etal06}).
593:
594: To obtain a better {H}\textsc{i} mass estimate and to measure an
595: accurate distance from surface brightness fluctuations or the tip
596: magnitude of the red giant branch will be part of a follow-up study
597: of NGC~5011C.
598:
599:
600: \acknowledgements{We acknowledge helpful discussions with Dominique Naef and Linda
601: Schmidtobreick, and we thank the anonymous referee for comments that
602: helped to improve the results of this work. We made use of the HIPASS
603: public data release. The Parkes telescope is part of the Australia
604: Telescope which is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operation
605: as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. This paper has been completed
606: thanks to a stay of I.S. at Mt Stromlo Observatory, supported both by
607: ESO (through a Director General grant) and the Australia National Unversity
608: (grant ARC DP0343156).}
609:
610:
611:
612:
613:
614: \begin{thebibliography}{(2000b)}
615: \bibitem[(2001)]{barnes_etal01} Barnes, D.G., Staveley-Smith, L.,
616: de Blok, W.J.G., et al.~2001, MNRAS, 322, 486
617:
618: \bibitem[(2006)]{beaulieu_etal06} Beaulieu, S.F., Freeman, K.C.,
619: Carignan, C., Lockman, F.J., Jerjen, H. 2006, AJ, 131, 325
620:
621: \bibitem[(2005)]{bessell05}Bessell, M. S. 2005, ARA\&A, 43, 293
622:
623: \bibitem[(1991)]{binggeli_cameron91} Binggeli, B. \& Cameron, L.M.
624: 1991, A\&A, 252, 27
625:
626: \bibitem[(1998)]{binggeli_jerjen98}Binggeli, B. \& Jerjen, H. 1998,
627: A\&A, 333, 17
628:
629: \bibitem[(2006)]{bouchard_etal06} Bouchard, A., Jerjen, H., Da Costa,
630: G. S., Ott, J. 2006, AJ, in press (astro-ph/0611423).
631:
632: \bibitem[(2003)]{bc03} Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344,
633: 1000
634:
635: \bibitem[(1984)]{buzzoni_etal84}Buzzoni, B., Delabre, B., Dekker,
636: H., Dodorico, S., Enard, D., Focardi, P., Gustafsson, B., Nees, W.,
637: Paureau, J., Reiss, R. 1984, Msngr, 38, 9
638:
639: \bibitem[(1997)]{cotge_etal97}C\^{o}t\'{e} S., Freeman, K.C., Carignan,
640: C., Quinn, P.J. 1997, AJ, 114, 1313
641:
642: \bibitem[(1999)]{allen}Cox, A.N. (ed), 1999, \emph{Allen's Astrophysical
643: Quantities}, Fourth Edition, Los Alamos, NM
644:
645: \bibitem[(1986)]{dickens_etal86} Dickens, R.J., Currie, M.J., Lucey,
646: J.R. 1986, MNRAS, 220, 679
647:
648: \bibitem[(1991)]{dressler_91} Dressler, A. 1991, ApJS, 75, 241
649:
650: \bibitem[(1983)]{fairall_83} Fairall, A.P. 1983, MNRAS, 203, 47
651:
652: \bibitem[(1992)]{hamuy_etal92}Hamuy, M., Walker, A.R., Suntzeff,
653: N.B., Gigoux, P., Heathcote, S.R., Phillips, M.M. 1992, PASP, 104,
654: 533
655:
656: \bibitem[(1994)]{hamuy_etal94}Hamuy, M., Suntzeff, N.B., Heathcote,
657: S.R., Walker, A.R., Gigoux, P., Phillips, M.M. 1994, PASP, 106, 566
658:
659: \bibitem[(1984)]{jacoby_etal84}Jacoby, G. H., Hunter, D. A., \& Christian,
660: C. A. 1984, ApJS, 56, 257
661:
662: \bibitem[(2004)]{jerjen_etal04} Jerjen, H., Bingeli, B., Barazza,
663: F. 2004, AJ, 127, 771
664:
665: \bibitem[(2000a)]{jerjen_etal00a} Jerjen, H., Binggeli, B., Freeman,
666: K.C. 2000a, AJ, 119, 593
667:
668: \bibitem[(2000b)]{jerjen_etal00b} Jerjen, H., Freeman, K.C., Binggeli,
669: B. 2000b, AJ, 119, 166
670:
671: \bibitem[(2001)]{jerjen_etal01} Jerjen, H., Rekola, R., Takalo, L.,
672: Coleman, M., Valtonen, M. 2001, A\&A, 380,90
673:
674: \bibitem[(2005)]{karachentsev05} Karachentsev, I.D 2005, AJ, 129,
675: 178
676:
677: \bibitem[(2006)]{karachentsev_etal06} Karachentsev, I.D., Tully,
678: R.B., Dolphin, A., Sharina, M., Makarova, L., Makarov, D., Kashibadze,
679: O.G., Karachentseva, V., Sakai, S., Shaya, E.J., Rizzi, L. 2006, AJ
680: submitted (astro/ph0603091)
681:
682: \bibitem[(1992)]{kennicutt92}Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1992, ApJ, 388,
683: 310
684:
685: \bibitem[(1989)]{luberts_valentijn89} Lauberts, A., \& Valentijn,
686: E. A. 1989, The Surface Photometry Catalogue of the ESO-Uppsala Galaxies,
687: ESO
688:
689: \bibitem[(1982)]{lauberts_82}Lauberts, A. 1982, ESO/Uppsala survey
690: of the ESO(B) atlas, ESO
691:
692: \bibitem[(1986)]{lucey_etal86} Lucey, J.R., Currie, M.J., Dickens,
693: R.J. 1986 MNRAS, 221, 453
694:
695: \bibitem[(2006)]{mei_etal06} Mei, S., Blankeslee, J.P. C\^{o}t\'{e},
696: P., Tonry, J.L., West, M.J., Ferrarese, L., Jord\'{a}n, A., Peng,
697: E.W., Anthony, A., Merritt, D. ApJ, in preparation
698:
699: \bibitem[(2005)]{mieske_etal05} Mieske, S. Hilker, M., Infante, L.
700: 2005, A\&A, 438, 103
701:
702: \bibitem[(1999)]{udry_etal99}Udry, S., Mayor, M., Queloz, D. 1999,
703: In: Precise Stellar Radial Velocities, ASP Conference Series 185,
704: IAU Colloquium 170. Eds. J. B. Hearnshaw and C. D. Scarfe, p. 367
705:
706: \bibitem[(1998)]{schlegel_etal98} {Schlegel}, D.J., {Finkbeiner},
707: D.P. \& {Davis}, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
708:
709: \bibitem[(1968)]{sersic_68} {S\'{e}rsic}, J.-L. 1968, Atlas de
710: galaxias australes, Observatorio Astronomico, Cordoba
711:
712: \bibitem[(2005)]{vallenari_etal05} Vallenari, A, Schmidtobreick,
713: L. \& Bomans, D.J. 2005, A\&A, 435, 821
714:
715: \bibitem[(1991)]{warmels91}Warmels, R.H. 1991, in Astronomical Data
716: Analysis Software and Systems I, PASP Conf. Series, Vol. 25, p. 115
717:
718: \bibitem[(1995)]{zaritsky_etal95}Zaritsky, D., Zabludoff, A. I.,
719: \& Willick, J. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 1602,
720:
721: \end{thebibliography}
722: \clearpage
723:
724: %
725: \begin{figure}
726: \plotone{f1.eps}
727:
728:
729: \caption{EFOSC2 true-color image of NGC~5011B (top red galaxy) and NGC~5011C
730: (bottom blue galaxy). The composite was created from BVR frames and
731: the field of view is $\sim5\arcmin\times5\arcmin$. North is up, East
732: to the left. \label{figcap:EFOSC2-true-color-image}}
733: \end{figure}
734:
735:
736: %\plotone{f2.eps}
737:
738:
739: \clearpage %\begin{centering}\begin{tabular}{cc}
740: %
741: \begin{figure*}
742:
743: % \begin{centering}\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{f2.eps}\par\end{centering}
744: \plotone{f2.eps}
745:
746:
747: \caption{The flux-calibrated, and normalized, spectra of NGC~5011B and NGC~5011C
748: are shown in the top and bottom panels, respectively. The dotted curves
749: show the original spectra, while the solid curves show the spectra
750: after correcting for the missing blue flux, and with their flux normalized
751: in the $[6000:6050]$\AA\ region. The spectrum of NGC~5011C has
752: been smoothed with a window of three pixels. The vertical dotted lines
753: show the location of the first five Balmer lines (H$\alpha$, $\beta$,
754: $\gamma$, $\delta$, $\epsilon$) red-shifted with the individual
755: velocities of the galaxies. The thick segment shows the (red-shifted)
756: location of the G band. NGC~5011C has evident Balmer lines and only
757: a hint of G band, while the G band and the H and K Ca lines at $\sim3950$~\AA\ are
758: clearly present in the spectrum of NGC~5011B. Moreover, only weak
759: H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ can be seen. The blue curves are model single
760: stellar populations, computed for an age of $4$~Gyr and $0.9$~Gyr,
761: and a metallicity $Z=0.02$ and $Z=0.004$ for NGC~5011B and NGC~5011C,
762: respectively (see text for details).\label{figcap:The-flux-calibrated-spectra} }
763: \end{figure*}
764:
765:
766: \clearpage %
767: \begin{figure}[t]
768: \plotone{f3.eps}
769:
770:
771: \caption{The radial velocities were computed by cross-correlating the upper
772: two and lower two spectra shown in this figure. The upper two continuum-normalized
773: spectra are those of NGC~5011B and the RV standard; the lower two
774: spectra are those of NGC~5011C and the same standard, after masking
775: the H$\gamma$ and G band region. The vertical solid segments identify
776: Balmer lines, while the dotted ones identify features typical of G-type
777: stars. In particular the heavy segment marks the position of the G
778: band. For the two galaxies, the wavelengths of the lines have been
779: red-shifted using the individual recession velocities computed in
780: Sec.~\ref{sec:Recession-velocities-of}. \label{fig:The-upper-two}}
781: \end{figure}
782:
783:
784: \clearpage
785:
786: %
787: \begin{figure}
788: \plotone{f4.eps}
789:
790:
791: \caption{(Top panel): BVR surface brightness profiles for NGC5011C as a function
792: of geometric radius $r=(ab)^{1/2}$, where $a$ and $b$ are the major
793: and minor axis. The best-fitting analytical Sersic profiles are superimposed
794: as black lines. (Bottom panel): extinction-corrected color gradients
795: smoothed with a third-order polynomial. \label{fig:sbprofiles}}
796: \end{figure}
797:
798:
799: \clearpage %
800: \begin{figure}
801: \plotone{f5.eps}
802:
803:
804: \caption{The galaxy distribution around NGC~5128 (triangle). Early-type galaxies
805: are indicated as filled circles and late-type galaxies as stars. Heliocentric
806: velocities (in km\,sec$^{-1}$) and distances (in Mpc) are given
807: in parenthesis if available from the literature. \label{figcap:distribution}}
808: \end{figure}
809:
810:
811: \clearpage %
812: \begin{figure*}[th]
813: \plotone{f6.eps}
814:
815:
816: \caption{The 21\,cm spectrum in the direction of NGC~5011C obtained from
817: the HIPASS public data release - v1.2 May 13, 2000 (south). The vertical
818: line and the grey band indicate the velocity and the 1$\sigma$ velocity
819: uncertainty as derived from our redshift measurement. Superimposed
820: is a 5-passes boxcar smoothed version of the spectrum (thick line)
821: that suggests a possible signal from {H}\textsc{i} emission at the
822: optical position. However the periodic baseline structure in the velocity
823: range 150\,km\,s$^{-1}<v<1500$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ makes it difficult
824: to draw a final conclusion. }
825:
826: \label{figcap:HIPASS}
827: \end{figure*}
828:
829:
830: \clearpage
831:
832: %
833: \begin{table}
834:
835: \caption{Journal of the observations. \label{tabcap:Journal-of-the}}
836:
837: %\begin{sideways}
838:
839:
840: \begin{centering}\begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
841: &
842: &
843: &
844: &
845: &
846: &
847: &
848: &
849: \tabularnewline
850: \hline
851: \hline
852: {\scriptsize UT start }&
853: {\scriptsize Target }&
854: {\scriptsize R.A.(J2000) }&
855: {\scriptsize DEC(J2000) }&
856: {\scriptsize t$_{{\rm exp}}$(sec) }&
857: {\scriptsize slit }&
858: {\scriptsize Filter/Grism}&
859: {\scriptsize Airmass}&
860: {\scriptsize $\delta v_{{\rm \odot}}$(km~sec$^{-1}$) }\tabularnewline
861: \hline
862: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T06:59:26}&
863: {\scriptsize NGC5011B/C }&
864: {\scriptsize 13 13 11.95 }&
865: {\scriptsize $-$43 15 56.0 }&
866: {\scriptsize 30 }&
867: {\scriptsize -- }&
868: {\scriptsize R }&
869: {\scriptsize 1.033 }&
870: {\scriptsize -- }\tabularnewline
871: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T07:00:32}&
872: {\scriptsize NGC5011B/C }&
873: {\scriptsize 13 13 11.95 }&
874: {\scriptsize $-$43 15 56.0 }&
875: {\scriptsize 60}&
876: {\scriptsize -- }&
877: {\scriptsize V }&
878: {\scriptsize 1.032 }&
879: {\scriptsize -- }\tabularnewline
880: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T07:02:11 }&
881: {\scriptsize NGC5011B/C }&
882: {\scriptsize 13 13 11.95 }&
883: {\scriptsize $-$43 15 56.0 }&
884: {\scriptsize 90}&
885: {\scriptsize -- }&
886: {\scriptsize B }&
887: {\scriptsize 1.032 }&
888: {\scriptsize -- }\tabularnewline
889: \hline
890: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T00:06:12 }&
891: {\scriptsize LTT2415 }&
892: {\scriptsize 05 56 24.30 }&
893: {\scriptsize $-$27 51 28.8 }&
894: {\scriptsize 40 }&
895: {\scriptsize 5$\arcsec$ }&
896: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
897: {\scriptsize 1.001 }&
898: {\scriptsize $-$17.85 }\tabularnewline
899: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T00:26:40 }&
900: {\scriptsize LTT3218 }&
901: {\scriptsize 08 41 34.10 }&
902: {\scriptsize $-$32 57 00.1 }&
903: {\scriptsize 40 }&
904: {\scriptsize 5$\arcsec$ }&
905: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
906: {\scriptsize 1.153 }&
907: {\scriptsize $-$4.80 }\tabularnewline
908: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T01:18:05 }&
909: {\scriptsize LTT3218 }&
910: {\scriptsize 08 41 34.10 }&
911: {\scriptsize $-$32 57 00.1 }&
912: {\scriptsize 40 }&
913: {\scriptsize 5$\arcsec$ }&
914: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
915: {\scriptsize 1.058 }&
916: {\scriptsize $-$4.88 }\tabularnewline
917: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T03:28:29 }&
918: {\scriptsize LTT3218 }&
919: {\scriptsize 08 41 34.10 }&
920: {\scriptsize $-$32 57 00.1 }&
921: {\scriptsize 40 }&
922: {\scriptsize 5$\arcsec$ }&
923: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
924: {\scriptsize 1.015 }&
925: {\scriptsize $-$5.10 }\tabularnewline
926: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T04:58:15 }&
927: {\scriptsize LTT4816 }&
928: {\scriptsize 12 38 50.94 }&
929: {\scriptsize $-$49 47 58.8}&
930: {\scriptsize 120 }&
931: {\scriptsize 5$\arcsec$ }&
932: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
933: {\scriptsize 1.137 }&
934: {\scriptsize 17.92 }\tabularnewline
935: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T05:16:36 }&
936: {\scriptsize NGC5011B/C }&
937: {\scriptsize 13 13 12.13 }&
938: {\scriptsize $-$43 14 47.3 }&
939: {\scriptsize 1200 }&
940: {\scriptsize 1$\arcsec$ }&
941: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
942: {\scriptsize 1.130 }&
943: {\scriptsize 20.73 }\tabularnewline
944: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T05:36:36 }&
945: {\scriptsize NGC5011B/C }&
946: {\scriptsize 13 13 11.88 }&
947: {\scriptsize $-$43 15 55.7 }&
948: {\scriptsize 1200 }&
949: {\scriptsize 1$\arcsec$ }&
950: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
951: {\scriptsize 1.097 }&
952: {\scriptsize 20.70 }\tabularnewline
953: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T05:56:36 }&
954: {\scriptsize NGC5011B/C }&
955: {\scriptsize 13 13 12.00 }&
956: {\scriptsize $-$43 15 21.5 }&
957: {\scriptsize 1200 }&
958: {\scriptsize 1$\arcsec$ }&
959: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
960: {\scriptsize 1.072 }&
961: {\scriptsize 20.68 }\tabularnewline
962: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T06:28:37 }&
963: {\scriptsize HD125184 }&
964: {\scriptsize 14 18 00.73 }&
965: {\scriptsize $-$07 32 32.6 }&
966: {\scriptsize 1 }&
967: {\scriptsize 1$\arcsec$ }&
968: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
969: {\scriptsize 1.210 }&
970: {\scriptsize 24.42 }\tabularnewline
971: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T06:29:37 }&
972: {\scriptsize HD125184 }&
973: {\scriptsize 14 18 00.73 }&
974: {\scriptsize $-$07 32 32.6 }&
975: {\scriptsize 1 }&
976: {\scriptsize 1$\arcsec$ }&
977: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
978: {\scriptsize 1.208 }&
979: {\scriptsize 24.42 }\tabularnewline
980: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T06:30:37 }&
981: {\scriptsize HD125184 }&
982: {\scriptsize 14 18 00.73 }&
983: {\scriptsize $-$07 32 32.6 }&
984: {\scriptsize 1 }&
985: {\scriptsize 1$\arcsec$ }&
986: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
987: {\scriptsize 1.206 }&
988: {\scriptsize 24.43 }\tabularnewline
989: {\scriptsize 2006-03-02T09:07:31 }&
990: {\scriptsize LTT6248 }&
991: {\scriptsize 15 39 00.02 }&
992: {\scriptsize $-$28 35 33.1 }&
993: {\scriptsize 40 }&
994: {\scriptsize 5$\arcsec$ }&
995: {\scriptsize \#11 }&
996: {\scriptsize 1.009 }&
997: {\scriptsize 29.15 }\tabularnewline
998: \hline
999: \end{tabular}%\end{sideways}
1000: \par\end{centering}
1001:
1002:
1003: \tablecomments{ For the target {}``NGC5011B/C'', the coordinates of NGC~5011B,
1004: of NGC~5011C, and of a point in-between the two galaxies, are listed
1005: in the three rows. Likewise the heliocentric velocity correction has
1006: been computed for the three positions and UTs, in order to show that
1007: an average correction can be safely adopted.}
1008: \end{table}
1009:
1010:
1011: \clearpage %
1012: \begin{table}[htdp]
1013:
1014: \caption{Photometric Parameters}
1015:
1016: \begin{centering}\begin{tabular}{lccc}
1017: &
1018: $B$ &
1019: $V$ &
1020: $R$ \tabularnewline
1021: \hline
1022: $m_{T}$ (mag) &
1023: $14.80\pm0.08$ &
1024: $13.95\pm0.07$ &
1025: $13.50\pm0.06$ \tabularnewline
1026: $r_{{\rm eff}}$ (arcsec) &
1027: $21.3\pm0.7$ &
1028: $23.3\pm0.5$ &
1029: $22.3\pm0.2$ \tabularnewline
1030: $\langle\mu\rangle_{{\rm eff}}$ (mag as$^{-2}$) &
1031: $23.44\pm0.08$ &
1032: $22.77\pm0.07$ &
1033: $22.23\pm0.06$ \tabularnewline
1034: \hline
1035: $\mu_{0}$ (mag as$^{-2}$) &
1036: $21.71\pm0.21$ &
1037: $21.15\pm0.14$ &
1038: $20.74\pm0.16$ \tabularnewline
1039: $r_{0}$ (arcsec) &
1040: $6.7\pm1.6$ &
1041: $8.3\pm1.2$ &
1042: $9.2\pm1.3$ \tabularnewline
1043: $n$ (S\'{e}rsic) &
1044: $0.73\pm0.07$ &
1045: $0.76\pm0.05$ &
1046: $0.81\pm0.05$ \tabularnewline
1047: \hline
1048: \end{tabular}\par\end{centering}
1049:
1050: \label{photdata}
1051: \end{table}
1052:
1053: \end{document}
1054: