1: %\documentclass{article}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %!TEX TS-program = latex
4:
5: %\includepackage{epsfig}
6:
7: \received{2006 August 4}
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{VLA Observations of J1228+441, a Luminous Supernova Remnant in
11: NGC 4449 }
12:
13: \author{Christina K. Lacey} \affil{University of South Carolina,
14: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Columbia, SC 29208}
15: \email{lacey@sc.edu}
16:
17: \author{W. M. Goss} \affil{ P.~O.~Box 0, National Radio Astronomy
18: Observatory, Socorro, NM 87801} \email{mgoss@nrao.edu}
19:
20: \author{Leila K. Mizouni} \affil{University of South Carolina,
21: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Columbia, SC 29208}
22: \email{mizouni@physics.sc.edu}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25:
26: The luminous, oxygen-rich supernova remnant, J1228+441, is located in
27: the irregular galaxy NGC 4449 and has been observed at radio
28: wavelengths for thirty years. An analysis of recent VLA observations
29: of NGC 4449, combined with VLA archive data and previously
30: published VLA and WSRT observations, yields light curves at 6 and
31: 20 cm from 1972 to 2002.
32: The light curves at all radio frequencies
33: exhibit a marked decline in radio emission, confirming past findings. This paper presents and
34: discusses the radio light curves and spectral index, $\alpha$,
35: variations from 1972 to 2002 where $S_\nu \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$ and compares J1228+441 with other radio supernovae.
36: The spectral index of J1228+441
37: appears to have steepened in the last five years
38: at higher frequencies from $\alpha=0.64\pm 0.02$ in 1996 to
39: $\alpha=1.01\pm 0.02$ in 2001-2002.
40:
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC 4449) -- supernovae: individual
44: (J1228+441)}
45:
46: \section{Introduction \label{intro}}
47:
48:
49: NGC 4449 is a Magellanic type irregular galaxy with several areas of
50: vigorous recent star formation, including the nucleus and the bar.
51: The distance to NGC 4449 has been suggested to range from 3.7 Mpc
52: (Bajaja et al. 1994) to 5.0 Mpc (Sandage \& Tammann 1975 and Aaronson
53: \& Mould 1983). In this paper, we adopt a distance of 3.9 Mpc (de
54: Vaucouleurs 1975). The recent star formation in NGC 4449 may have
55: been triggered by a past galactic collision and tidal stripping
56: (Hunter, van Woerden, \& Gallagher 1999). The massive stars formed in
57: the recent star formation episodes can then become the progenitors for
58: core-collapse supernovae.
59:
60: The ultra-luminous supernova remnant (SNR), J1228+441, was first detected by Seaquist \&
61: Bignell (1978) and Balick \& Heckman (1978) at radio and optical
62: wavelengths, respectively.
63: The nonthermal spectral index, $\alpha$=0.95 $\pm$0.27 ( $S_\nu
64: \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$, where $S$ is the flux density at frequency
65: $\nu$) (Seaquist \& Bignell 1978), and observations of both broad and
66: narrow lines in the optical spectrum (Balick \& Heckman 1978) of
67: J1228+441 indicate that the source was a SNR. Additional optical
68: spectroscopic observations by Kirshner \& Blair (1980), Blair,
69: Kirsher, \& Winkler (1983) confirmed that the SNR is embedded in
70: and interacting with a nearby \ion{H}{2} region.
71:
72: An upper limit of the diameter of J1228+441 was determined first by
73: De Bruyn (1983) who used European VLBI data to place a limit of $\le
74: 0\farcs07$ ( 1.3 pc at 3.9 Mpc) on the angular size of J1228+441.
75: The age of J1228+441 has been estimated from expansion velocities in
76: excess of 6,000 km~s$^{-1}$, based on UV/optical HST and ground based
77: observations (Blair \& Fesen 1998, Blair 2006). The age of J1228+441
78: was estimated to lie in the range of 60 - 200 years. In this paper,
79: we adopt an explosion date of 1900 for J1228+441 with a large
80: uncertainty. Blair \& Fesen (1998) and Blair (2006) found an upper
81: limit of 0\farcs028 (or 0.5 pc) for the diameter of the SNR based on
82: HST data. J1228+441 is one of the few known intermediate aged SNRs
83: with an age between that of Cas A, which is $\sim$330 years (Thorstensen, Fesen, \& van den Bergh 2001), and that of
84: the oldest known extragalactic radio supernovae, SN 1923A in M83
85: (Eck et al. 1998), which is 83 years old, and SN 1957D also in M83 (Pennington \& Dufour 1983), which is 49 years old.
86: J1228+441 is also notable as the most luminous and most distant
87: member of the class of oxygen-rich SNRs (Blair, Kirshner, \& Winkler
88: 1983).
89:
90:
91: Radio observations of J1228+441 were reported by de Bruyn, Goss, \&
92: van Woerden (1981), de Bruyn (1983), and Bignell and Seaquist
93: (1983). De Bruyn, Goss, \& van Woerden (1981) used Westerbork
94: Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) observations of J1228+441 and found
95: a long-term trend of decline in the radio emission at 6 cm over a
96: period of seven years.
97: Bignell and Seaquist (1983) reported NRAO\footnote{The National Radio
98: Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science
99: Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
100: Universities, Inc.} Very Large Array (VLA) observations of J1228+441
101: from 1979 to 1982
102: and concluded that the new observations showed significant variability
103: at 5GHz. However, they could not establish the nature of the
104: variability based on their data. Additional WSRT observations from
105: late 1980 to 1982 were reported by de Bruyn (1983), who found that
106: the flux density of J1228+441 at 5 GHz confirmed the decline first
107: reported in de Bruyn, Goss, \& van Woerden (1981).
108: There is also weak evidence that the X-ray emission from J1228+441
109: has decreased by roughly a factor of two from the {\it Einstein} data
110: of 1983 (Fabbiano et al. 1992) compared to both the ROSAT data of
111: 1997 (Vogler \& Pietsch 1997) and the {\it Chandra} data of 2002
112: (Summers et al. 2003, Patnaude \& Fesen 2003).
113:
114:
115:
116: \section{The VLA Observations of J1228+441}
117:
118:
119: A series of VLA observations was undertaken in 1994; A array
120: observations at 20 cm with a beam of 1.3\arcsec $\times$ 1.2\arcsec,
121: PA= 86\arcdeg, and a rms noise of 0.026 mJy~beam$^{-1}$ were carried
122: out on 30 March 1994, followed by B array observations at 6 cm with a
123: beam of 2.42\arcsec $\times$ 1.39\arcsec, PA= 82\arcdeg, and a rms
124: noise of 0.028 mJy~beam$^{-1}$, 16-17 June 1994. These observations
125: form the basis of a comprehensive study of NGC 4449, which will be
126: reported elsewhere (Lacey et al. 2006). In Figure \ref{snrkntr}, we
127: show the location of J1228+441 within the galaxy NGC 4449. The source
128: is located 30\arcsec~ (570 pc, projected) north of the center
129: (position given by Hunter et al. 1998) of NGC 4449.
130:
131: To follow the variations in flux density in the intervening years
132: since de Bruyn (1983) and Bignell \& Seaquist (1983) the VLA
133: archive was searched for observations of NGC 4449 and J1228+441 that
134: had not been previously published. A total of twelve 20 cm
135: observations, fifteen 6 cm observations, and six additional
136: wavelength observations were located in the archive. These
137: observations of J1228+441 are presented in Table~\ref{taball},
138: containing the observation date, telescope, beam parameters, VLA
139: configuration, frequency (20 cm ~1.4 GHz and 6 cm ~4.8 GHz), flux
140: density, and one sigma errors. The WSRT data from de Bruyn
141: (1983), the published VLA data from Seaquist \& Bignell (1978),
142: Bignell \& Seaquist (1983), and Johnson et al. 2006 are also
143: included in Table~\ref{taball}. The WSRT data (Table~\ref{taball})
144: are taken from only de Bruyn (1983), in which the WSRT data were
145: corrected to the Baars et al. (1977) flux density scale. In addition,
146: the observations from de Bruyn et al. (1981) were corrected for
147: radio confusion arising from a nearby \ion{H}{2} region. De Bruyn
148: (1983) notes that the confusion in the 7\arcsec\ WSRT beam at 6 cm
149: is $<0.5$ mJy. For the lower frequency VLA data (1.4 to 5 GHz), the
150: effects of a confusing source of 380 mJy at 20 cm located 8\arcmin~
151: to the southwest of J1228+441 must be subtracted in the imaging
152: process. The confusing source is located at $\alpha(2000): 12^h 27^m
153: 42\fs00 \pm 0\fs02, \delta(2000): 44\arcdeg 00\arcmin 42\farcs0 \pm
154: 0\farcs2$. For the spectral line observations at \ion{H}{1} (1.420
155: GHz) and OH (1.720) GHz only the continuum channels were used.
156:
157:
158:
159:
160: \section{Time Dependent Decline of Radio Emission}
161:
162: The flux density of J1228+441 has declined gradually over 30 years
163: (1972 to 2002). The 20 cm and 6 cm light curves presented in
164: Figure~\ref{lightcurve} clearly demonstrate a decline in the radio
165: emission at both frequencies. De Bruyn (1983) suggested that, in
166: addition to the smooth decline of radio emission, there were possible
167: small variations from a smooth decline. The VLA data at 6 cm
168: presented in this paper suggest that variations of 0.7$\pm$0.3 mJy
169: over short time scales (two to three years) may be present in addition
170: to the overall smooth decline, but the evidence for the
171: short-time scale deviations from a smooth decline is only at a level
172: of 2$\sigma$.
173:
174:
175: \section{Evolution of the Spectral Index}
176:
177: De Bruyn, Goss, \& van Woerden (1981) compared their 5GHz
178: measurements with Seaquist and Bignell (1978) and found that
179: J1228+441 must have undergone significant variability in order to
180: explain the variability in spectral index measurements. De Bruyn,
181: Goss, \& van Woerden (1981) speculated that the spectral index
182: varied with a timescale of a few years. Bignell \& Seaquist (1983)
183: also found that the spectral index must have changed from the
184: earliest value of $\alpha=0.98$ to 0.62, which was flatter.
185:
186: Table~\ref{alpha} lists the dates and the spectral index, $S_\nu
187: \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$, based on two frequencies that were observed
188: within an interval of 8 - 16 months. Figure ~\ref{alphat} displays the
189: spectral index calculated from two frequencies for J1228+441 over
190: the time period 1972 to 2002. The spectral index is variable from
191: 1972 until 1982 as noted by De Bruyn, Goss, \& van Woerden (1981).
192: This early period is characterized by the largest flux density errors
193: and the 6 cm (4.8 GHz) flux density varies from $13.0 \pm 2.0 $ mJy in
194: 1973, to an upper limit of $< 8.5$ mJy in 1973, to $10.9 \pm 2.9, 2.1$
195: mJy in 1974. The spectral index has a relatively
196: constant value of $\alpha=0.65 \pm 0.02$ from 1982 to 1996.
197: This
198: period has high sensitivity VLA data and the 6 and 20 cm were observed on the same day, which eliminates temporal effects from the determination of the spectral index. The spectral index then
199: steepens to 1.0 $\pm$ 0.02 in 2001 -- 2002. In 2001-- 2002, a 22 GHz
200: and a 4.9 GHz frequency
201: observation provided the most reliable measure of the spectral index since the frequency range covers an order of
202: magnitude. In
203: summary, analysis of Figure ~\ref{alphat} shows an essentially
204: constant value from 1980 through 1997, with possible small scale
205: variations at the 1 -- 2~$\sigma$ level with a period of two to three
206: years. After 1997, the spectral index steepens.
207:
208:
209: The spectrum of J1228+441 is shown in Figure~\ref{specall} at three
210: epochs: 1982, 1996, and 2001-2002. The fitted values of $\alpha$
211: shown in Figure~\ref{specall} are: $\alpha=0.70\pm0.03$ in 1982,
212: $\alpha=0.64\pm0.02$ in 1996, and $\alpha=1.0\pm0.02$ in 2001-2002.
213: The spectrum of J1228+441 is only shown for cases in which three or
214: more observations at substantially different frequencies were
215: available within a time range of
216: 8 months for the spectra in 1994 and 1996 and
217: within a time range of 16 months for the 2001-2002 spectrum. As expected, the early
218: spectra exhibit a higher flux density for each frequency than the
219: later epoch spectra. In addition, the 2001-2002 epoch spectrum
220: displays a steepening that is also reflected in the steepening of
221: the spectral index (see Figure ~\ref{alphat}), providing additional
222: support that the spectral index is steepening and that the steepening
223: is not just due to the time difference between the observations in
224: 2001-2002.
225:
226: Montes et al. (2000) also reported spectral index variations for the radio SN 1979C (see Section~\ref{secsne} for a discussion of the differences between radio SNe and SNRs); the spectral index both steepened and flattened over time scales on the order of $\le$ 365 days for the time period between 4300 -- 7100 days after the explosion. Unfortunately, a scarcity of high frequency observations and adequate time coverage of the radio emission from SN 1979C during this period prevented the testing of hypotheses concerning the mechanism responsible for the spectral index variations. Both
227: J1228+441 and SN 1979C highlight the need for future observations of both objects over closely spaced time intervals covering
228: the full radio frequency range in order to fully confirm the magnitude and time scale of the small-scale variations.
229:
230: The steepening of the spectrum of J1228+441 is most likely caused by synchrotron or inverse Compton radiation losses, possibly augmented by the effects of adiabatic expansion.
231: Extensive multi-wavelength monitoring of
232: J1228+331 over an extended period of time is required in order to produce spectra with enough precision to confirm the spectral steepening and identify the time period over which the spectral index changes. More precise determinations of the radio spectra are required in order
233: to determine the mechanism that is responsible for the likely spectral
234: steepening.
235:
236:
237: \section{Discussion \label{disc}}
238:
239: The fractional decline rate, $\frac{dS}{S dt}$, can be calculated for both the 6 cm and
240: 20 cm data from 1975 to 2001 using the relation.
241: We find rates: $\frac{dS}{S dt}=
242: -2.3\%\pm$ 0.4\% per year at 6 cm and $\frac{dS}{S dt}= -2.8\%\pm$
243: 0.6\% per year at 20 cm.
244: The high
245: sensitivity VLA
246: observations dominate the estimate of the fractional decline rate.
247: The decline of J1228+441 is well fit by a constant fractional
248: decline rate; there is no evidence that this
249: rate has changed over the $\sim$25 years of observations.
250: These rates are noticeably less than the rate of $\sim -6\%$ per
251: year at 6 cm found by de Bruyn, Goss, \& van Woerden (1981) for a
252: shorter interval of 1975 to 1981.
253: The decline rate of J1228+441 is similar to that of Cas A, which is
254: -1.3\% per year for the radio ring (Tuffs 1986) for the period of 1974
255: to 1978, and much larger than that of the Crab Nebula, which is -0.17
256: \%$\pm$ 0.02 \% per year for the period of 1968 to 1984 (Aller \&
257: Reynolds 1985).
258:
259: If the flux density evolution is described by $S(t)=
260: S_0\left ( \frac{t}{t_0} \right )^{\beta}$, where $t$ is the time since the explosion, then $\beta$ is just $\frac{dS}{S dt}$ multiplied by the age of the remnant (de Bruyn, Goss, \& van Woerden 1981). Since the age of J1228+441 is not well known, we give $\beta$ at 6 cm for a range of ages: for an age of t=100 yrs, $\beta=-2.3$; for an age of 150 years, $\beta=-3.5$; and for an age of 200 yrs, $\beta=-4.6$. Similarly, for 20 cm we find: for an age of t=100 yrs, $\beta=-2.8$; for an age of 150 years, $\beta=-4.2$; and for an age of 200 yrs, $\beta=-5.6$. The values of $\beta$ calculated for different ages of J1228+441 vary significantly due to the large error in the age and, thus, are not useful without a better estimate of the age.
261:
262:
263:
264: \section{J1228+441 Compared with the Oldest Radio SNe \label{secsne}}
265:
266: There is some ambiguity in the classification of radio supernovae and SNRs. Supernovae are objects that are generally discovered at optical wavelengths soon after the initial explosion. The explosion date of a SN is often known very precisely with current SN monitoring programs and all supernovae are characterized by a light curve that over time exhibits an initial rise in the emission, a peak, and then a gradual decline. Radio emission from optically identified SNe arises from the interaction of the supernova shock with the circumstellar medium (CSM) that was initially created by the progenitor star. The CSM originates from the stellar winds of the red supergiant phase of the progenitor star and typically expands with speeds around 10 km s$^{-1}$, which allows the much faster supernova shock to overrun the CSM. The rise and decline of radio emission due to the CSM interaction with the shock has been modeled (Weiler et al. 2002 and references therein). Radio SNRs are primarily objects that have ages of 300 -- 10,000 years and a typical radio SNR produces radio emission arising from the interaction of the shock with plowed up interstellar material. The youngest radio SNRs, e.g. the Crab Nebula and Cas A, show small declines in radio emission of a few percent per year. Very few SNRs have known explosion dates; the few that are known, such as the Crab Nebula, are known due to historical records and measurements of shock expansion speeds. In the Milky Way Galaxy, a supernova has not occurred in the last 200 years and the youngest Galactic SNR, Cas A, exploded in the late 17th century with some uncertainty as to the exact explosion date (Thorstensen, Fesen, \& van den Bergh 2001). The currently known supernovae are all extragalactic in origin. The transition between the CSM dominated phase of a radio SN to the ISM dominated phase of a radio SNR has not been observed and the transition is predicted to depend on the CSM and the ISM distributions. The environment, in particular the density and distribution of the ISM, of a SNR greatly affects the ability of a SNR to produce radio emission (Lacey and Duric 2001).
267:
268: SN 1957D and SN 1950B in M83 and SN 1970G in M101 are radio
269: supernovae whose radio emission has been identified and monitored for
270: at least three decades. SN 1961V in NGC 1058 was initially identified
271: as a peculiar SN, but the exact nature of SN 1961V is still uncertain
272: (Chu et al. 2004). We compared J1228+441 with the young Galactic SNRs, the Crab and Cas A, in Section~\ref{disc}. Since J1228+441 has declining radio emission, it is natural to compare this object with other older radio supernovae. Table~\ref{radiosne} shows the basic properties
273: of J1228+441 compared with SN 1957D, SN 1950B, and SN 1970G.
274:
275: Figure~\ref{rsne} compares J1228+441 with other core collapse extragalactic radio
276: supernovae and young Galactic supernova remnants in a figure adapted from
277: Stockdale et al. (2001). In order to compare J1228+441 with other
278: supernovae and supernova remnants, the age of J1228+441 was assumed
279: to be 100 years (explosion date 1900 AD, see the discussion of this uncertainty in
280: Section~\ref{intro}) and the luminosity was calculated using the
281: same model as Stockdale et al. (2001). The current luminosity of
282: J1228+441 is comparable to the peak luminosity of SN 1970G and
283: higher than the current luminosities of two Galactic SNRs, Cas A and
284: the Crab. While J1228+441 currently appears in the middle range of
285: the radio supernovae luminosities in Figure~\ref{rsne}, the actual
286: peak luminosity of J1228+441 is unknown; its true peak luminosity
287: on Figure~\ref{rsne} could be higher and could be comparable to the
288: peak luminosities of SN 1979C, SN 1986J, and SN 1978K. It is
289: tempting to speculate that J1228+441 occupies a transition region
290: between radio supernovae and young Galactic core-collapse SNRs, but this transition region is due mostly to the historical classification of the Crab and Cas A and may not represent a significant difference or transition in the physical properties between SNe and SNRs.
291:
292:
293: Cowan, Goss \& Sramak (1991) and Stockdale et al. (2001) observed
294: SN 1970G with the VLA in 1990 and 2000, respectively. These VLA
295: observations of SN 1970G were combined with previous WSRT
296: observations by Gottesman et al. (1972) and Allen et al. (1976) in
297: 1971 through 1975 so that SN 1970G was observed over a three decade
298: period similar to the time interval of J1228+441. Both J1228+441
299: and SN 1970G have experienced changes in the spectral index; the
300: spectral index of J1228+441 has steepened from $\sim$0.65 in 1996 to
301: $\sim$1.0 in 2001-2002 while the spectral index of SN 1970G has
302: flattened from 0.56$\pm$0.11 in 1990 to 0.24$\pm$0.20 in 2000
303: (Stockdale et al. 2001).
304:
305: From the data in Stockdale et al. (2001) and Cowan, Goss, and Sramek (1991),
306: the fractional decline rate for SN 1970G can be calculated for the two periods with different spectral indices that Stockdale et al. (2001) identified. Between 1973 and 1991, the decline rate for SN 1970G at 20 cm was $\frac{dS}{S dt}= -6\%\pm
307: 2\%$ per year and between 1991 and 2001, $\frac{dS}{S dt}= -1.1\%\pm
308: 1.3\%$ per year. The fractional decline rate of J1228+441, $\frac{dS}{S dt}$= -2.8\%$\pm$ 0.6\% per
309: year at 20 cm, is intermediate to the two values found for SN 1970G.
310:
311:
312: Stockdale et al. (2001) suggest that the change in $\alpha$ for SN
313: 1970G could be due to changes in the CSM density. The radio
314: supernova, SN 1993J, has also shown a flattening of the spectral index at
315: $\sim$ 8 years of age, caused by changes in the deceleration rate
316: of the shock (Bartel et al. 2002). Given that J1228+441 is interacting with a
317: nearby \ion{H}{2} region (Blair, Kirshner, \& Winkler 1983), the
318: density profile of the CSM and ISM environment that the remnant shock
319: is encountering is likely to be complex, which could cause future
320: changes in the deceleration rate of the shock and the fractional decline rate.
321:
322: \section{Summary}
323:
324: The light curve of J1228+441 shows a significant decline at 6 and 20
325: cms with a fractional decline rate of $\frac{dS}{S dt}$= -2.3\%$\pm$
326: 0.4\% per year at 6 cm and $\frac{dS}{S dt}$= -2.8\%$\pm$ 0.6\% per
327: year at 20 cm over the time interval 1975 to 2001. In the epoch
328: 2001- 2002, a significant steepening of the spectral index was
329: observed. The spectral index steepened from $\alpha=0.65 \pm 0.02$
330: from 1982 to 1996 to $\alpha =1.0 \pm 0.02$ in 2001-2002. The
331: spectrum of J1228+441 also steepened in 2001-2002.
332:
333:
334:
335: As J1228+441 continues to evolve, additional monitoring at radio,
336: X-ray, and optical wavelengths over multiple epochs is needed in
337: order to follow the evolution and determine the properties of this
338: young SNR. Further monitoring at multiple radio frequencies, with
339: the multiple frequencies observed on the same day, are required to
340: better define the light curve. Future changes in the spectral index
341: and the fractional decline rate could occur if expansion velocities
342: and deceleration rates change as the shock encounters changes in the
343: density profiles of the CSM and ISM. Additional optical
344: spectroscopy will yield shock velocities, deceleration rates, and
345: determine the evolutionary stage and aid in the interpretation of
346: the radio observations.
347:
348: \acknowledgements { We thank W. P. Blair, C. J. Stockdale, and
349: R. A. Sramek for constructive comments that helped us improve this
350: paper. We also thank the referee for a number of helpful comments. }
351: \section{References}
352:
353: \parindent 0.0cm
354:
355: Allen, R. J., Goss, W. M., Ekers, R. D., \& de Bruyn, A. G. 1976,
356: \aap, 48, 253
357:
358: Aller, H.D. \& Reynolds, S.P. 1985, \apj, 293L, 73
359:
360: Anderson, M.C. \& Rudnick, L. 1995, \apj, 441, 300
361:
362: %Anderson, M.C. \& Rudnick, L. 1996, \apj, 456, 234
363:
364: Baars, J. W. M., Genzel, R., Pauliny-Toth, I.I.K., \& Witzel, A.,
365: 1977, \aap, 61, 99
366:
367: Bajaja, E., Huchtmeier, W. K., \& Klein, U. 1994, \aap, 285, 385
368:
369: Balick, B. \& Heckman, T. 1978, \apjl, 226, L5
370:
371: Bartel N., Bietenholz, M. F., Rupen, M. P., Beasley, A.J., Graham,
372: Da.A., Altunun, V.I., Venturi, T., Umana, G., Cannon, W.H., \&
373: Conway, J.E. 2002, \apj, 581, 404
374:
375: Blair,W.P., Raymond, J.C., Fesen, R.A., \& Gull, T.R. 1984, \apj,
376: 279, 708
377:
378: Blair, W.P., Kirshner, R. P., \& Winkler, P.F., Jr, 1983, \apj,
379: 272, 84
380:
381: Blair, W. P. 2006, Private communication
382:
383: Blair, W.P. \& Fesen, R.A., 1998, \baas, 193, 7404
384:
385: Bignell, R.C. \& Seaquist, E.R., 1983, \apj, 270, 140
386:
387: Chu, Y.-H., Gruendl, R. A., Stockdale, C. J., Rupen, M. P., Cowan,
388: J. J., \& Teare, S. W., 2004, \aj, 127, 2850 Condon, J. \& Yin, ApJ,
389: 357, 97, 1990
390:
391: Cowan, J. J., Goss, W. M., \& Sramek, R. A., 1991, \apjl, 379L, 49
392:
393: Cowan, J.J. \& Branch, D., 1982, \apj, 258, 31
394:
395: %Cowsick, R. \& Sarkar, S., 1984, \mnras, 207, 745
396:
397: de Bruyn, A.G., 1983, \aap, 119,301
398:
399: de Bruyn, A.G., Goss, W. M., \&, van Woerden, H., 1981, \aap, 94, L25
400:
401: de Vaucouleurs, G. 1975, in Galaxies and the Universe, ed. A. Sandage,
402: M. Sandage, \& J. Kristian (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press), 557
403:
404: %Dickel, J.R, D'Odorico, S., \& Silverman, A. 1985, \aj, 90, 414
405:
406: %Drury, L. O'C., Markiewicz, W. J., \& V\"{o}lk, H. J., 1989, \aap,
407: %225, 179
408:
409: %Duric, N., Gordon, S. M., Goss, W. M., Viallefond, F., \& Lacey, C.,
410: %1995, \apj, 445, 173
411:
412:
413: Eck, C. R., Roberts, D. A., Cowan, J. J., \& Branch, D., 1998, \apj,
414: 508, 664
415:
416: Fabbiano, G., Kim D.-W., \& Trinchieri, G., 1992, \apjs, 80, 531
417:
418:
419: Goss, W. M., Allen, R. J., Ekers, R. D., \& de Bruyn, A. G., 1973,
420: \aap, 243, 42
421:
422: Gottesman, S. T., Broderick, J. J., Brown, R. L., Balick, B., \&
423: Palmer, P. 1972, \apj, 174, 383
424:
425: Hunter, D.A., van Woerden, H., \& Gallagher, J. S., 1999, \aj, 118,
426: 2184
427:
428: Hunter, D.A., Wilcots, E.M., van Woerden, H., Gallagher, J. S., \&
429: Kohle, S., 1998, \apj, 495L, 47
430:
431: %Hutchmeier, W.K., Seiradakis, J.H., \& Mattern, J. 1981, \aap, 102,
432: %34
433:
434: %Jun, B.-I. \& Jones, T. W. 1999, \apj, 511, 774
435:
436: Johnson, K. E. et al., 2006, in preparation.
437:
438: Kirshner, R. P. \& Blair, W. P. 1980, \apj, 236, 135
439:
440: Lacey et al. 2006, in preparation.
441:
442: Lacey, C. K. \& Duric, N., 2001, \apj, 560, 719
443:
444: Long, K. S, Winkler, P. F., \& Blair, W. P., 1992, \apj, 395, 632
445:
446: %Markiewicz, W. J., Drury, L. O'C., \& V\"{o}lk, 1990, \aap, 236, 487
447:
448: %Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Blundell, K. M., Rupen, M. P., Mioduszewski, A. J., Duffy,
449: %P., \& Beasley, A. J., 2004, \apj, 600, 368
450:
451: Montes, M. J., Weiler, K. W., van Dyk, S.D., Panagia, N., Lacey,
452: C.K., Sramek, R.A., \& Park, R., 2000, \apj, 532, 1124
453:
454: Patnaude, D. J., \& Fesen, R.A. 2003, \apj, 587, 221
455:
456: Pennington, R. L. \& Dufour, R. J., 1983, \apjl, 270L, 7
457:
458: Sandage, A. \& Katem, B. 1976, \aj, 81, 743
459:
460: Seaquist, E.R. \& Bignell, R.C., 1978, \apj, 226, L5
461:
462: Stockdale, C. J., Goss, W. M., Cowan, J. J., \& Sramek, R. A., 2001,
463: \apjl, 559, 139
464:
465: Stockdale, C. J., Maddox, L.A., Cowan, J. J., Prestwich, A., Kilgard,
466: R., \& Immler, S., 2006, \apj, 131, 889.
467:
468: Stockdale, C. J., Sramek., R. A., Williams, C. L., Van Dyk, S. D.,
469: Weiler, K. W. , \& Panagia, N., 2006a, New Radio Supernova Results.
470:
471: Summers,L.K., Stevens, I.R., Strickland, D.K. \& Heckman, T.M., 2003,
472: \mnras, 342, 690
473:
474: Thorstensen, Fesen, \& van den Bergh, 2001, \aj, 122, 297
475:
476: Tuffs, R.J., 1986, \mnras, 219, 13
477:
478:
479: V\"{o}gler, A. \& Pietsch, W. 1997, \aap, 319, 459
480:
481: Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., Montes, M. J., \& Sramek, R. A., 2002, \araa, 40, 387
482:
483: \newpage
484:
485:
486:
487:
488: \begin{figure}
489: \plotone{f1.eps}
490: \caption{The 20 cm emission from NGC 4449 is shown with contour levels
491: of -3, 3, 10, 30, 60, 100, and 150 times 26 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$.
492: J1228+441, the luminous SNR, is the brightest source in NGC 4449 at
493: 20 cm and is denoted by a cross. The image has been corrected for
494: primary beam attenuation. The observation was carried out on 30
495: March 1994 and the observing parameters were: beam size = 1.3\arcsec
496: $\times$ 1.2\arcsec, PA= 86\arcdeg, and a rms noise of 26
497: $\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. \label{snrkntr}}
498: \end{figure}
499:
500: \begin{figure}
501: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
502: \caption{The lightcurves of J1228+441 at 6 cm and 20 cm. Both light
503: curves show a significant decrease in the period of 1979 to 2002.
504: % A
505: %line with $\beta=-0.26$ ($S\propto t^{\beta}$) is indicated on both
506: %the 6 and 20 cm plots.
507: %A line with
508: %the best fit to the power law is plotted where $S=S_0
509: %(t/t_0)^{-\beta}$ and $\beta$ is the index of decline.
510: \label{lightcurve}}
511: \end{figure}
512:
513: %\begin{figure}
514: %\epsscale{.80} \plotone{20and6cm.ps}
515: % \caption {The 6 and 20 cm lightcurves of J1228+441plotted on the same
516: % graph. \label{6and20}}
517: %\end{figure}
518:
519: \begin{figure}
520: \plotone{f3.eps}
521: \caption{Evolution of the spectral index from 1974 to 2002.
522: \label{alphat}}
523: \end{figure}
524:
525: \begin{figure}
526: \plotone{f4.eps}
527: \caption{The continuum spectra of J1228+441 from 1982 - 2002. The
528: points in each epoch were fitted to $S_\nu \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$,
529: where $\alpha$ is the spectral index. The values of $\alpha$ are:
530: $\alpha=0.70\pm0.03$ in 1982, $\alpha=0.64\pm0.02$ in 1996, and
531: $\alpha=1.0\pm0.02$ in 2001-2002.
532: \label{specall}}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: %\begin{figure}
536: %\plotone{spectrumlate.ps}
537: %\caption{The spectra of J1228+441 from 1994- 2002 \label{speclate}}
538: %\end{figure}
539:
540:
541:
542:
543: \begin{figure}
544: \plotone{f5_color.eps}
545: \caption{A comparison of the luminosity at 20 cm and age of J1228+441
546: with other radio supernovae and young Galactic supernova
547: remnants. The earliest 20 cm luminosity of J1228+331 (red crosses)
548: is placed at an age of 100 years with a horizontal red arrow
549: indicating the uncertainty in the age of between 60 and 200 years.
550: The earliest luminosity of J1228+441 is probably not the peak 20 cm
551: luminosity of J1228+441. J1228+441 occupies a space between the
552: oldest radio supernovae and some of the youngest Galactic supernova
553: remnants. Data for SN 1923A (red x), SN1950B (blue stars), SN
554: 1957D(grey open squares), SN 1968D (blue filled diamonds), SN 1970G
555: (red open circles), SN1978K (blue filled circles), the Crab Nebula
556: (green inverted triangle) and Cas A (blue open diamond) were taken
557: from (Stockdale et al. 2001, Stockdale et al. 2006, and references
558: therein). Data for SN 1979C (green open triangles), SN 1980K
559: (grey filled triangles), and SN 1986J (orange crosses) were taken
560: from Stockdale et al. (2006a). (Stockdale et al. (2006a), New Radio
561: Supernova Results, are
562: available online at:
563: http://rsd-www.nrl.navy.mil/7213/weiler/sne-home.html and
564: references therein.) \label{rsne}}
565: \end{figure}
566:
567: \input{tab1.tex}
568:
569: \input{tab2.tex}
570:
571: \input{tab3.tex}
572:
573: \end{document}
574:
575: