astro-ph0701543/ms.tex
1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2: 
3: %%% PREAMBLE MATTER
4: 
5: \usepackage{asp2006}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: \usepackage{psfig}
8: \usepackage{lscape}
9: 
10: \markboth{}{}   %%% Fill in authors' names and short running title
11: 
12: \pagestyle{myheadings}
13: \setcounter{equation}{0}
14: \setcounter{figure}{0}
15: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
16: \setcounter{section}{0}
17: \setcounter{table}{0}
18: \def\ls{{_<\atop^{\sim}}}
19: \def\gs{{_>\atop^{\sim}}}
20: \def\ergss{ergs s$^{-1}$\/}
21: %%% MAIN PART OF DOCUMENT
22: 
23: \begin{document}
24: \title{Time-Evolving Photoionization: the Thin and Compact X-Ray Wind of NGC~4051}   
25: %%% Fill in title
26: \author{Fabrizio Nicastro$^1$, Martin Elvis, Nancy Brickhouse}   %%% Fill in author names
27: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 
28: $^1$OAR-INAF, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy}
29: \author{Yair Krongold, Luc Binette}
30: \affil{Instituto de Astronomia - UNAM, Mexico D.F., Mexico}
31: \author{Smita Mathur}
32: \affil{Astronomy Department of Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA}
33: %%% Fill in author affiliations
34: 
35: \begin{abstract} %%% Abstract to run on from here.
36: We discuss the power of time-evolving photoionization as a diagnostic tool to measure 
37: the electron density of photoionized gas.  
38: We apply this technique to a XMM-{\em Newton} observation of the ionized 
39: absorber in the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC~4051, and present the first measurements 
40: of the its volume density, its distance from the central ionizing source, and so 
41: its mass outflow rate. By extrapolating these measurements to high-luminosity, large 
42: black hole mass, quasars, we speculate that AGN winds can play important roles both in the
43:  AGN-host-galaxy and AGN-IGM feedback processes. 
44: \end{abstract}
45: 
46: %%% MAIN BODY OF TEXT GOES HERE. CONSULT "INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS USING
47: %%% LATEX2E MARKUP", SECTIONS 2.3-2.6 FOR HELP WITH EQUATIONS, FIGURES,
48: %%% AND TABLES.
49: 
50: \section{Ionized AGN Winds: Open Questions}
51: Ionized X-ray absorbers ({\em Warm Absorbers}: WAs) have been observed in 
52: the spectra of $\gs 50$ \% of Seyfert 1s (e.g. 
53: Crenshaw, Kraemer \& George 2003) and quasars (Piconcelli 
54: et al. 2005). Such high detection rates, 
55: combined with evidence for transverse flows (Mathur et al. 1995;
56: Crenshaw, Kraemer \& George 2003) suggest that WAs are actually
57: ubiquitous in AGN, but become directly visible in absorption only when our line 
58: of sight crosses the outflowing  material. 
59: Despite their ubiquity, very little is still know about their physical 
60: state, dynamical strength and geometry. 
61: The most fundamental  question is where do quasar winds originate?
62: Addressing this question requires the independent determination of a quantity which is 
63: not directly observable: the electron density $n_e$ of the outflowing material. 
64: 
65: \section{Time Evolving Photoionization} 
66: Recent studies have mostly shown that WAs are made up of 
67: just a few distinct physical components (e.g. Krongold et al., 2007 - K07 - and 
68: references therein). However, for each of these components, 
69: only average estimates of the product $(n_e R^2)$ could be derived, from time-averaged 
70: spectral analyses. This is due to the intrinsic degeneracy of $n_e$ and $R$ in the 
71: equation that defines the two observables: the ionization parameter of the 
72: gas $U_x = Q_x / (4 \pi R^2 c n_e)$ and the luminosity of ionizing photons $Q_x$. 
73: 
74: An unambiguous method to remove this degeneracy is to monitor the
75: response of the ionization state of the gas in the wind to changes of
76: the ionizing continuum (Krolik \& Kriss 1995; Nicastro et al. 1999: hereinafter N99). 
77: Time-evolving photoionization equations define the Photoionization Equilibrium Time scale, 
78: $t_{eq}$, that measures the time necessary for the gas to reach photoionization 
79: equilibrium with the ionizing continuum (N99).  
80: This time-scale depends explicitly on the
81: electron density $n_e$ in the cloud, during both increasing and decreasing 
82: ionizing continuum phases (N99). 
83: Non-equilibrium photoionization models can therefore be used to measure the 
84: density of the gas $n_e$ and, hence, its distance from the ionizing source. 
85: 
86: Here, we apply this technique to a high S/N XMM-{\em Newton} observation 
87: of the low luminosity ($L_{bol} = 2.5 \times 10^{43}$ \ergss, Ogle et al. 2004), 
88: low black hole mass (M$_{BH} = 1.9 \times 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$, Peterson et al. 2004), 
89: and rapidly ($\sim$ 1 hour) and highly (factor of $\sim 10$, McHardy et al. 2004) 
90: X-ray variable Narrow Line Seyfert 1 NGC~4051. 
91: 
92: \section{The Variable Ionized Absorber of NGC~4051}
93: NGC 4051 was observed for $\sim$117 ks with the XMM-Newton
94: Observatory, on 2001 May 16-17. The source varied by a factor of a few on 
95: timescales as short as 1~ks, and  by a factor of $\sim$12 from minimum
96: to maximum flux over the whole observation (Fig. 1a).
97: Details of the data reduction and analysis can be found in K07. 
98: 
99: Two physically distinct but dynamically coincident ($v_{out} = 500$ km s$^{-1}$) 
100: WA phases were found in the average RGS spectrum 
101: of NGC~4051: a high- and a low-ionization phase (HIP and LIP). 
102: 
103: \begin{figure}[!ht]
104: \plottwo{f1.eps}{f2.eps}
105: \caption{(left) Lightcurve of NGC 4051 in bins of 100 s [panel (a)];  
106: Log of the count rate vs. time, for the 21 ``flux states'' used in this analysis 
107: [panel (b)]; Log of the ionization parameter of HIP [panel (c)] and LIP [panel (d)] 
108: as a function of time: filled squares are the expected value of $U_X$ at  equilibrium. 
109: Figure 2. \hspace{0.2cm} (right) Log$U_X(t)$ vs. log of the source count rate 
110: for the HIP [panel (a)] and the LIP [panel (b)].} 
111: \end{figure}
112: 
113: \subsection{Following the Time Variability of HIP and LIP}
114: To study the response of the WAs of NGC~4051 to ionizing flux changes, 
115: we performed a time-resolved spectral analysis of 21 
116: EPIC-PN spectra extracted from 21 distinct continuum levels ({\em a - u},
117: see Fig. 1b)
118: %
119: \footnote{We checked, on average Low- and High-State (LS and HS in Fig. 1a) 
120: RGS and EPIC-PN spectra, that both detectors allowed the detection of WA  
121: opacity variations, and gave consistent results (see K07)}
122: %
123: . For both absorbing components the derived $U_X$ values  follow closely
124: the source continuum lightcurve [compare panel (c) and (d) with panel (b) of Fig. 1], 
125: clearly indicating that the gas is responding quickly to the changes in the 
126: ionizing continuum. 
127: 
128: To study more quantitatively how these changes are related to the changes in the continuum, 
129: we show in Fig. 2a,b the log of 
130: the source count rate (log$C(t)$) vs. log$U_X(t)$, for the HIP
131: [panel (a)] and the LIP [panel (b)]. 
132: For most of the points of the HIP and for all the points of the LIP
133: (within 2$\sigma$), log$C(t)$ correlates with log$U_X(t)$ tightly, which allows us to 
134: derive robust estimates of the quantity ($n_e R^2$) for both components 
135: (best fit lines in Fig. 2a,b, Table 1). 
136: 
137: Fig. 2a,b shows that the LIP is always in photoionization equilibrium 
138: with the ionizing flux, while the HIP deviates from photoionization equilibrium 
139: during periods of extreme flux states. 
140: Unlike the LIP, then (for which only an upper limit on $t_{eq}$, 
141: and so a lower limit on $n_e$, can be estimated), the behavior of the HIP allows us 
142: to set both lower and upper limits on $t_{eq}(HIP)$, and so on $n_e(HIP)$. 
143: 
144: \setcounter{figure}{2}
145: \begin{figure}
146: \plotone{f3.eps}
147: \caption{Location of features in the nuclear environment of NGC~4051 on a light-day scale.}
148: \end{figure}
149: 
150: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
151: \begin{table}
152: \caption{Physical and dynamical parameters of HIP and LIP of NGC~4051}
153: \footnotesize
154: \begin{tabular}{|lccccccc|}
155: \hline
156: Abs. & $(n_eR^2)$ & $n_e$ & P$_e$ & $R$ & $\Delta R$ & $(\Delta R / R)$ & $\dot{M}_{out}
157: /\dot{M}_{in}$ \\
158: & $10^{38}$ cm$^{-1}$ & $10^{7}$ cm$^{-3}$ & $10^{12}$ K cm$^{-3}$ & $10^{15}$ cm & 
159: $10^{14}$ cm & & \% \\
160: \hline
161: HIP & $(0.38 \pm 0.05)$ & (0.58-2.1) & (2.9-10.5) & (1.3-2.6) & (1.9-7.2) &  (0.1-0.2) & 
162: (2-3)\\
163: LIP & $(66 \pm 3)$  & $>8.1$ & $> 2.4$ & $< 8.9$ & $< 0.09$ & $< 10^{-3}$ & $< 2$ \\
164: \hline
165: \end{tabular}
166: \end{table}
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168: 
169: \section{Results}
170: From these independent estimates of $n_e$ and $(n_e R^2)$, 
171: we can derive limits on $R$ and so evaluate all physical and dynamical parameters
172: of the gas, including the mass outflow rate. 
173: Table 1 summarizes our findings. Fig. 3 shows a schematic view of the location of the 
174: ionized outflow in NGC~4051. We find that: 
175: 
176: \noindent 
177: (1) time-evolving photoionization models are key diagnostics to measure the electron 
178: density in gas photoionized by variable X-ray sources; 
179: 
180: \noindent 
181: (2) the two X-ray WAs of NGC~4051 are both close to 
182: photoionization equilibrium, dense, compact and possibly in pressure balance 
183: (Fig. 3, Table 1); 
184: 
185: \noindent 
186: (3) the Narrow Emission Line Region (NELR), molecular torus and any radial continuous 
187: flow, are all ruled out as origin of the WAs of NGC~4051 (Fig. 3); 
188: 
189: \noindent 
190: (4) a static spherical configuration for the WAs of NGC~4051 is ruled out, 
191: and a dynamical but stationary spherical configuration (i.e. expulsion of 
192: thin spherical shells at regular time intervals) is highly unlikely, 
193: since it requires extremely fine tuning not to degenerate in a radial continuous flow; 
194: 
195: \noindent 
196: (5) the next simplest geometrical configuration, for the WAs of NGC~4051, 
197: is that of geometrically thin cone sections, originating in the accretion disk at a 
198: distance consistent with that of the high-ionization BLRs (Fig. 3; Elvis, 2000); 
199: 
200: \noindent 
201: (6) if this configuration  applies to all AGN, then the presence or absence of
202: WAs in the X-ray spectra of type 1 AGNs is explained simply by orientation,
203: with WAs being visible only in those objects seen between edge-on and an angle
204: equal to the disk-outflow angle;
205: 
206: \noindent 
207: (7) the by-conical configuration is consistent with all our findings 
208: and provides reasonable values for the mass outflow rates of the WA of NGC~4051, 
209: relative to the source accretion rate: $\dot{M}_{out} = 2-5 $\% $\dot{M}_{in}$ (Table 1); 
210: 
211: \noindent 
212: (8) these values, if extrapolated to high luminosity QSOs, suggest that 
213: WAs may play an important role in locally feeding the IGM with enriched material.  
214: 
215: Finally, we note that a radial extension of disk winds toward larger disk radii, 
216: could produce cold absorption, as seen in type 2 AGNs (Risaliti, Elvis \& Nicastro, 
217: 2002): in such objects WAs would be masked by the cold absorption, but the ionized wind 
218: would still shine in X-rays and could produce the photoionized X-ray cones observed
219: in several Seyfert 2s (Guainazzi, this conference).
220: 
221: \acknowledgements F.N. acknowledges support by NASA grant NNG05GK47G. 
222: 
223: \begin{thebibliography}{}
224: \bibitem[]{}Crenshaw, D.~M., Kraemer, S.~B., \& George, I.~M.\ 2003, \aapr, 41, 117
225: \bibitem[]{}Elvis, M.\ 2000, \apj, 545, 63 
226: \bibitem[]{}Krolik, J.~H.~\& Kriss, G.~A.\ 2001, \apj, 561, 684
227: \bibitem[]{}Krongold, Y. et al.\ 2007, \apj, in press 
228: \bibitem[]{}Mathur, S., Elvis, M., \& Wilkes, B.\ 1995, \apj, 452, 230
229: \bibitem[]{}McHardy, I.~M., et al.\ 2004, \mnras, 348, 783 
230: \bibitem[]{}Nicastro, F., Fiore, F., \& Matt, G.\ 1999, \apj, 517, 108
231: \bibitem[]{}Ogle, P.~M. et al.\ 2004, \apj, 606, 151 
232: \bibitem[]{}Peterson B.M. et al. 2004, ApJ 613, 682
233: \bibitem[]{}Piconcelli, E. et al.\ 2005, \aap, 432, 15 
234: \bibitem[]{}Risaliti, G., Elvis, M. \& Nicastro, F., 2002, \apj, 571, 234
235: \end{thebibliography}
236: 
237: \end{document}
238: