1:
2: %% REVISED Shafter, Coelho, and Reed manuscript
3:
4: %% The command below calls the preprint style
5: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
6: %%
7: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
8:
9: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
10:
11: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
12:
13: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
14:
15: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
16:
17: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
18: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
19: %% use the longabstract style option.
20:
21: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
22:
23: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
24: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
25: %% the \begin{document} command.
26: %%
27: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
28: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
29: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
30: %% for information.
31:
32: %% \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
33: %% \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
34:
35: %% My defs
36: \def\lessim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
37: \def\grtsim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
38:
39: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
40:
41: %% \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
42:
43: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
44: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
45: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
46: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et~al.). The right
47: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
48: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
49:
50: \shorttitle{Photometry of VS0329+1250}
51: \shortauthors{Shafter et~al.}
52:
53: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
54: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
59: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
60: %% you desire.
61:
62: \title{Photometry of VS0329+1250:\\ A New, Short-Period SU~Ursae Majoris Star}
63:
64: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
65: %% author and affiliation information.
66: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
67: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
68: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
69: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
70:
71: \author{A. W. Shafter, E. A. Coelho \& J. K. Reed}
72: \affil{Department of Astronomy and Mount Laguna Observatory\\
73: San Diego State University\\
74: San Diego, CA 92182}
75: \email{aws@nova.sdsu.edu,ecoelho@sciences.sdsu.edu,jreed@sciences.sdsu.edu}
76:
77: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
78: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
79: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
80: %% affiliation.
81:
82: %% \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
83: %% CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
84: %% Foundation.}
85: %% \altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
86: %% \altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
87: %% 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
88: %% \altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
89: %% \altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
90:
91: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
92: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
93: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
94: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
95: %% editorial office after submission.
96:
97: \begin{abstract}
98:
99: Time-resolved CCD photometry is presented of the recently-discovered
100: ($V\simeq15$ at maximum light) eruptive variable star in Taurus,
101: which we dub VS0329+1250.
102: A total of $\sim$20~hr of data obtained over six
103: nights reveals superhumps in the light curves,
104: confirming the star as a member of the SU~UMa class of dwarf novae.
105: The superhumps recur with a mean period of 0.053394(7) days
106: (76.89~min), which represents the shortest superhump period
107: known in a classical SU~UMa star.
108: A quadratic
109: fit to the timings of superhump maxima reveals that the superhump
110: period was increasing
111: at a rate given by $\dot P_\mathrm{sh}\simeq(2.1\pm0.8)\times10^{-5}$ over
112: the course of our observations.
113: An empirical relation between orbital period and
114: the absolute visual magnitude of dwarf novae at maximum light,
115: suggests that VS0329+1250 lies at a distance of $\sim1.2\pm0.2$~kpc.
116:
117: \end{abstract}
118:
119: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
120: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
121: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
122: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
123:
124: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
125: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
126: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
127: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
128: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
129: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
130: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
131: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
132: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
133: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
134: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
135: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
136:
137: \keywords{binaries: novae, cataclysmic variables -
138: stars: dwarf novae - stars: individual (\objectname{VS0329+1250})}
139:
140: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
141: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
142: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
143: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
144: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
145: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
146: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
147: %% each reference.
148:
149: \section{Introduction}
150:
151: The SU~UMa stars are a subclass of the dwarf novae that
152: are observed at orbital periods, $P\lessim3$~hr (for reviews
153: see Warner 1995, Osaki 1996). These systems
154: usually display two types of outburst: normal
155: dwarf nova outbursts, and ``superoutbursts", which are the defining
156: characteristic of the SU~UMa stars. Superoutbursts are usually
157: brighter (by $\sim0.5$~mag), and always last longer (weeks vs. days),
158: compared to normal outbursts. During superoutbursts, the
159: SU~UMa stars always display $\sim0.2$~mag modulations in their light
160: curves called ``superhumps", which have
161: been attributed to the prograde precession of an eccentric accretion
162: disk in these systems (Whitehurst 1988). The shortest period
163: SU~UMa systems that display
164: particularly large superoutburst amplitudes ($\grtsim6$~mag),
165: long intervals between eruptions ($\grtsim5$~yrs), and
166: light curve modulations near the orbital period early in the
167: outburst (so called ``early superhumps")
168: are sometimes referred to as the WZ~Sge stars (Bailey 1979, Kato et~al. 2001).
169:
170: VS0329+1250 was discovered as an optical transient
171: on 26 October 2006 as part of a comet and asteroid search program
172: (PIKA) conducted with the Crni Vrh 0.6-m Cichocki
173: telescope (Skvarc 2006). Follow-up observations reported in
174: Skvarc (2006) revealed a $\sim$0.2~mag modulation with a period of
175: $\sim0.0541$ days, which led to the
176: suggestion that the variations were superhumps, and that
177: the object was likely a previously unknown SU~UMa dwarf nova.
178:
179: In this paper we present time-resolved V-band photometry
180: of VS0329+1250 originally reported in Shafter et~al. (2006)
181: that has enabled us to confirm the object
182: as an SU~UMa dwarf nova,
183: to estimate its distance,
184: and to establish a revised superhump period, which is
185: the shortest currently known among the classical SU~UMa stars.
186:
187: \section{Observations}
188:
189: A finding chart for VS0329+1250 (in outburst) is shown in Figure~1,
190: with the coordinates taken from Skvarc (2006).
191: Observations
192: were carried out during six nights in 2006 October and November using
193: the Mount Laguna Observatory 1~m reflector.
194: On each night a series of
195: exposures (typically 60~s) were taken through a Johnson-Cousins
196: $V$ filter (see Bessel 1990), and imaged on a Loral $2048^2$ CCD.
197: To increase the time-sampling efficiency, only an $800\times800$
198: subsection of the
199: full array was read out. The subsection was chosen to include
200: VS0329+1250 and
201: several relatively bright nearby stars to be used as comparison objects for
202: differential photometry.
203: A summary of observations is presented in Table~1.
204:
205: The data were processed in a standard fashion (bias subtraction and
206: flat-fielding) using IRAF.\footnote{
207: IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is distributed by the
208: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by AURA, Inc.,
209: under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}
210: The individual images were subsequently
211: aligned to a common coordinate system and
212: instrumental magnitudes for VS0329+1250
213: and two nearby comparison stars were then determined using the
214: {\it IRAF\/} APPHOT package.
215: Variations in atmospheric transparency were removed to first order by dividing
216: the flux of VS0329+1250 by a nearby comparison star located approximately
217: $40''$E and $20''$N of the variable (star ``C" in Fig. 1).
218: The $V$-band differential light curves were then placed on an
219: absolute scale by calibration of the comparison star against the
220: standard stars in Landolt (1992). The magnitude of the comparison star
221: is characterized by $B=15.0\pm0.1$ and $V=14.2\pm0.1$.
222: The calibrated light curves of VS0329+1250 are
223: displayed in Figure~2. In addition to the $V$-band data,
224: a few measurements
225: were obtained through a $B$ filter at the end of our $V$ sequence on
226: 29-Oct-06 UT in order to estimate the $B-V$ color of VS0329+1250.
227: We find $B-V\simeq0.1\pm0.1$ at the time of superhump minimum.
228:
229: \section{The Superhump Period}
230:
231: During the six nights of observation, we observed a total of 16
232: superhump maxima. The timings of maximum light were obtained from
233: the point of intersection of straight line segments fitted by eye to the
234: ascending and descending portions of the hump profile. The accuracy
235: of our timings degraded over time as the hump morphology changed
236: from a symmetrical ``sawtooth" shape early on to a more asymmetrical and
237: less defined profile,
238: as the hump amplitude diminished.
239: We estimate the timings of maximum, given in Table~2, to be generally
240: accurate to better than $\pm2$~min, with the timings for the last night
241: of observation somewhat more uncertain.
242:
243: A linear least-squares fit of the superhump maxima from Table~2
244: yields the following ephemeris for superhump maximum in VS0329+1250:
245: \begin{equation}
246: T_{\mathrm{max}} = {\rm HJD}~2,454,036.8135(4)+0.053394(7)~E.
247: \end{equation}
248: Residuals of the individual timings with respect to eqn~(1)
249: are included in Table~2, and are plotted as a function of cycle number
250: in Figure~3. Despite the considerable scatter,
251: a trend with cycle number is evident, which suggests that the superhump period
252: increased during the course of our observations.
253: A quadratic fit to the residuals, shown by the solid line
254: in Figure~3, gives
255: $\dot P_\mathrm{sh}\simeq(2.1\pm0.8)\times10^{-5}$.
256: The mean superhump period of 0.053394~d (76.89~min) is slightly
257: shorter than that of TSS~J022216.4+412259.9 (Imada et~al. 2006),
258: which had previously held the record as
259: the SU~UMa system with the shortest known superhump
260: period\footnote{The unusual dwarf novae
261: V485~Cen (Olech 1997)
262: and EI~Psc (Oemura et~al. 2002a) have shorter periods, but it is not yet clear
263: how they are related to the classical SU~UMa stars (e.g. Oemura 2002b).}
264:
265: For many years it was thought that
266: the superhumps in SU~UMa stars were characterized by $\dot P_\mathrm{sh}<0$,
267: with the superhump period drifting lower as the
268: outburst evolved (Warner 1985, Patterson et~al. 1993).
269: However, the situation changed
270: about a decade ago with the discovery of an apparently
271: stable superhump period during an outburst of
272: AL~Com (Howell et~al. 1996, Patterson et~al. 1996),
273: and a period
274: increase during an outburst of SW~UMa (Semeniuk et~al. 1997;
275: Nogami et~al. 1998).
276: With the discovery of several new SU~UMa stars
277: in recent years, it has now been clearly established that
278: among the shortest period systems, such as VS0329+1250,
279: increases in the superhump period are usually observed
280: (e.g. Imada et~al. 2005, Uemura et~al. 2005, and references therein).
281: It has been proposed that
282: the period increases seen in the shortest period
283: SU~UMa stars with extreme mass ratios
284: may result from a tidal resonance radius well inside the primary's
285: Roche lobe that enables the eccentric disk wave to propagate outwards
286: (Baba et~al. 2000).
287:
288: The superhump periods in SU~UMa stars are usually longer
289: than the orbital periods,
290: with the ``period excess", defined as
291: $\epsilon\equiv(P_\mathrm{sh}-P_\mathrm{orb})/P_\mathrm{orb}$, generally
292: increasing linearly with $P_\mathrm{orb}$ (Stolz \& Schoembs 1984, Patterson
293: 1998). The relationship becomes less well defined at the shortest orbital
294: periods, where $\epsilon$ typically lies in the range
295: $0.01\lessim~\epsilon~\lessim0.03$.
296: At present, the period excess for VS0329+1250
297: cannot be computed precisely because
298: the orbital period of the system has not yet been directly measured.
299: Nevertheless, if VS0329+1250
300: has a period excess typical of SU~UMa stars with similar superhump
301: periods, we estimate that the orbital period, $P_\mathrm{orb}\simeq76$~min.
302: Once the orbital period is measured, and a precise value of $\epsilon$
303: determined, it will become possible to begin to explore the structure
304: and evolutionary state of the VS0329+1250 system using existing
305: empirical and theoretical relationships between
306: the period excess and mass ratio (e.g. Patterson 2001,
307: Patterson et~al. 2005, Pearson 2006).
308:
309: \section{The Distance to VS0329+1250}
310:
311: We can make a rough estimate of the distance to VS0329+1250 by appealing
312: to the empirical relation between the orbital period and absolute
313: magnitude of dwarf novae at maximum light
314: given by Warner (1987). For normal dwarf
315: nova eruptions Warner finds $M_V(\mathrm{max})=5.64-0.259~P(\mathrm{hr})$.
316: Given a period
317: of 1.27~hr, we estimate $M_V(\mathrm{max})\simeq5.3\pm0.3$,
318: where the assumed uncertainty reflects the effect of the
319: unknown orbital inclination on the absolute magnitude of the system.
320: Since the outburst
321: of VS0329+1250 presented here is the only recorded outburst of the system,
322: the peak magnitude of a normal outburst (assuming VS0329+1250 exhibits
323: normal outbursts) is not known. For our purposes, we will assume
324: a normal outburst magnitude that
325: is 0.5~mag fainter than the
326: superoutburst maximum, which is typical of SU~UMa stars.
327: Thus, we adopt $m_V(\mathrm{max})=15.7$ for VS0329+1250 based upon
328: the observed superoutburst maximum of $m_V=15.2$ (Skvarc 2006).
329: The high Galactic latitude of VS0329+1250 ($|b|\simeq35^{\circ}$) suggests that
330: the interstellar extinction to the object is likely to be negligible.
331: Thus, we estimate that VS0329+1250 lies at a distance,
332: $d\simeq1.2\pm0.2$~kpc.
333: The fact that VS0329+1250 is not
334: visible on the POSS or the DSS reveals that the eruption
335: amplitude, $A\grtsim6$~mag, which is typical of the shortest period
336: SU~UMa stars (WZ~Sge stars), and suggests that $M_V(\mathrm{min})\grtsim11$.
337:
338: \section{Conclusions}
339:
340: We have presented six nights of time-resolved V-band CCD photometry of
341: the eruptive variable star, VS0329+1250,
342: recently discovered by Skvarc (2006). Our principal conclusions are
343: as follows:
344:
345: 1) Superhumps are seen in
346: the light curves of VS0329+1250 that recur with a period
347: $P_\mathrm{sh}=0.053394(7)$~d, clearly establishing the system
348: as a member of the SU~UMa class of dwarf novae.
349: The superhump period is the shortest
350: of any known SU~UMa system, with the possible exception of
351: the dwarf novae V385 Cen and EI Psc,
352: whose relationship to the classical SU~UMa systems is unclear.
353:
354: 2) VS0329+1250 faded by about 0.08 mag per day from a mean magnitude of
355: $V\simeq15.6$ on our first night of observation (2 days post discovery)
356: to $V\simeq16.1$ six
357: nights later, at which time the superhumps had nearly disappeared.
358:
359: 3) The superhump timings are consistent with an increasing period over the
360: week spanned by our observations,
361: with $\dot P_\mathrm{sh}\simeq(2.1\pm0.8)\times10^{-5}$.
362:
363: 4) Using Warner's (1987) empirical relation between the absolute visual
364: magnitude of dwarf novae at maximum light and orbital period,
365: we estimate a distance to VS0329+1250 of $\sim1.2\pm0.2$~kpc.
366:
367: Future observations will be required to firmly establish the
368: nature of VS0329+1250, and to determine if it
369: should be included as a member of the WZ~Sge stars.
370: Specifically, the system
371: should be monitored for subsequent outbursts
372: that will establish the outburst recurrence time.
373: More extensive photometry during future superoutbursts should
374: help to better characterize the stability of the superhump period.
375: Finally, a single deep image of the field should be attempted
376: to measure the quiescent magnitude
377: of VS0329+1250, and thereby establish its outburst amplitude.
378:
379: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
380: %% command.
381:
382: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
383: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
384: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
385: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
386: %% text to be printed in the second.
387:
388: \acknowledgments
389: We thank the referee for insightful comments on the original manuscript.
390: This research was partially supported by NSF grant AST-0607682.
391:
392: \begin{references}
393:
394: \reference{} Baba, H., et~al. 2000, PASJ, 52, 429.
395:
396: \reference{} Bailey, J. 1979, MNRAS, 189, 41P.
397:
398: \reference{} Bessel, M. S. 1990, PASP, 102, 1181.
399:
400: \reference{} Howell, S. B., et~al. 1996, AJ, 111, 2367.
401:
402: \reference{} Imada, A., et~al. 2005, PASJ, 57, 193.
403:
404: \reference{} Imada, A., et~al. 2006, PASJ, 58, L23.
405:
406: \reference{} Kato, T., Sekine, Y., and Hirata, R. 2001, PASJ, 53, 1191.
407:
408: \reference{} Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340.
409:
410: \reference{} Nogami, D., et~al. 1998, PASJ, 50, 405.
411:
412: \reference{} Olech, A. 1997, AcA, 47, 281.
413:
414: \reference{} Osaki, Y. 1996, PASP, 108, 390.
415:
416: \reference{} Patterson, J. 1998, PASP, 110, 1132.
417:
418: \reference{} Patterson, J. 2001, PASP, 113, 736.
419:
420: \reference{} Patterson, J., et~al. 1996, PASP, 108, 748.
421:
422: \reference{} Patterson, J., Bond, H. E., Grauer, A. D., Shafter, A. W., \& Mattei, J. A. 1993, PASP, 105, 69.
423:
424: \reference{} Patterson, J., et~al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1204.
425:
426: \reference{} Pearson, K. J. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 235.
427:
428: \reference{} Semeniuk, I, Olech, A., Kwast, T., \& Nale\.zyty, M. 1997, AcA, 47, 201.
429:
430: \reference{} Shafter, A. W., Coelho, E. A., \& Reed, J. K. 2006, ATel \#938.
431:
432: \reference{} Skvarc, J. 2006, CBET, \#701.
433:
434: \reference{} Stolz, B., \& Schoembs, R. 1984, A\&A, 132, 187.
435:
436: \reference{} Uemura, M., et~al. 2002a, PASJ, 54, L15.
437:
438: \reference{} Uemura, M., et~al. 2002b, PASJ, 54, 599.
439:
440: \reference{} Uemura, M., et~al. 2005, A\&A, 432, 261.
441:
442: \reference{} Warner, B. 1985, in Interacting Binaries, ed. P. P. Eggleton \& J. E. Pringle (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company), 367.
443:
444: \reference{} Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars, Cambridge Univ. Press.
445:
446: \reference{} Warner, B. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 23.
447:
448: \reference{} Whitehurst, R. 1988, MNRAS, 232, 35.
449:
450: \end{references}
451:
452: \clearpage
453:
454: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
455: \tablenum{1}
456: \tablewidth{0pt}
457: \tablecolumns{5}
458: \tablecaption{Summary of Observations}
459: \tablehead{\colhead{} &
460: \colhead{UT Time} &
461: \colhead{Time Resolution\tablenotemark{a}} &
462: \colhead{Number of} &
463: \colhead{} \\
464: \colhead{UT Date} &
465: \colhead{(start of observations)} &
466: \colhead{(sec)} &
467: \colhead{Exposures} &
468: \colhead{Filter} }
469: \startdata
470: 2006 Oct 28 &06:30:02.5 &38.32 &100 &V\\
471: 2006 Oct 29 &05:33:00.0 &65.43 &372 &V\\
472: 2006 Oct 29 &12:20:00.0 &65.43 &3 & B\\
473: 2006 Oct 30 &04:45:08.4 &65.43 &330 &V\\
474: 2006 Nov 01 &05:12:00.0 &65.43 &92 &V\\
475: 2006 Nov 02 &07:45:00.0 &65.43 &130 &V\\
476: 2006 Nov 03 &06:21:00.0 &65.43 &130 &V\\
477: \enddata
478: \tablenotetext{a}{Mean time interval between exposures (integration time plus
479: readout time)}
480: \end{deluxetable}
481:
482: \clearpage
483:
484: \begin{deluxetable}{lcr}
485: \tablenum{2}
486: \tablecaption{Superhump Timings}
487: \tablewidth{0pt}
488: \tablehead{ \colhead{HJD (peak)} &
489: \colhead{Cycle Number} &
490: \colhead{$O-C$} \\
491: \colhead{(2,450,000+)} &
492: \colhead{$(E)$} &
493: \colhead{($\times10^{-3}$~day)} }
494: \startdata
495: 4036.8146\dots & 0 & $1.075$ \\
496: 4037.7749\dots & 18 & $0.297$ \\
497: 4037.8272\dots & 19 & $-0.847$ \\
498: 4037.8809\dots & 20 & $-0.471$ \\
499: 4037.9355\dots & 21 & $0.664$ \\
500: 4037.9885\dots & 22 & $0.280$ \\
501: 4038.7357\dots & 36 & $-0.070$ \\
502: 4038.7894\dots & 37 & $0.295$ \\
503: 4038.8432\dots & 38 & $0.681$ \\
504: 4038.8947\dots & 39 & $-1.223$ \\
505: 4038.9492\dots & 40 & $-0.087$ \\
506: 4040.7634\dots & 74 & $-1.265$ \\
507: 4041.8311\dots & 94 & $-1.501$ \\
508: 4041.8856\dots & 95 & $-0.366$ \\
509: 4042.7940\dots & 112 & $0.291$ \\
510: 4042.8493\dots & 113 & $2.247$ \\
511: \enddata
512: \label{time}
513: \end{deluxetable}
514:
515: \clearpage
516:
517: \begin{figure}
518: \epsscale{0.80}
519: \plotone{f1.ps}
520: \caption{The finding chart for VS0329+1250. The coordinates of
521: VS0329+1250 are RA. = 03:29:12.26, DECL. = +12:50:17.6
522: (equinox 2000.0) as given in Skvarc (2006).
523: The comparison star used to calibrate our data is located
524: $\sim40''$E and $\sim20''$N of VS0329+1250, and is marked
525: as star ``C".}
526: \end{figure}
527:
528: \clearpage
529:
530: \begin{figure}
531: \epsscale{0.80}
532: \plotone{f2.eps}
533: \caption{The $V$-band light curves of VS0329+1250.
534: Superhumps are clearly evident, with the hump amplitude
535: gradually decreasing and changing shape
536: as the system fades over the seven days
537: spanned by our data.
538: The measured times of superhump maximum are indicated by
539: the vertical tick marks. The first timing on 02-Nov-06, and
540: both timings on 03-Nov-06 are relatively uncertain due to
541: poor coverage of hump maximum, and decreasing signal-to-noise.}
542: \end{figure}
543:
544: \clearpage
545:
546: \begin{figure}
547: \epsscale{0.80}
548: \plotone{f3.eps}
549: \caption{The residuals of the observed times of superhump maximum with respect
550: to the times predicted from eqn~(1) are plotted as a function of
551: superhump cycle number. The open circles represent the superhump
552: timings with relatively large uncertainties.
553: These data suggest an increase
554: in the superhump period, with
555: the fit shown by the solid line corresponding to
556: $\dot P_\mathrm{sh}\simeq(2.1\pm0.8)\times10^{-5}$.}
557: \end{figure}
558:
559: \end{document}
560: