1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
5:
6: \received{}
7: \accepted{}
8:
9: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ}
10:
11: \newcommand{\rhk}{R$^{\prime}_{\mathrm{HK}}$}
12: \newcommand{\ms}{\mbox{m\,s$^{-1}$}}
13: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km\,s$^{-1}$}}
14: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\odot}$}
15: \newcommand{\rsun}{R$_{\odot}$}
16: \newcommand{\mjup}{M$_{\rm J}$}
17: \newcommand{\msat}{M$_{\rm SAT}$}
18: \newcommand{\rjup}{R$_{\rm J}$}
19: \newcommand{\msini}{$M \sin i$}
20: \newcommand{\sini}{$\sin i~$}
21: \newcommand{\vsini}{$v\sin i$}
22: \newcommand{\Mv}{M$_{\rm v}~$}
23: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
24: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
25: \newcommand{\poneper}{3.33\,yr}
26: \newcommand{\ptwoper}{9.97\,yr}
27: \newcommand{\pthreeper}{2.70\,yr}
28: \newcommand{\pfouraper}{409\,d}
29: \newcommand{\pfourbper}{7.94\,yr}
30: \newcommand{\poneecc}{0.44}
31: \newcommand{\ptwoecc}{0.44}
32: \newcommand{\pthreeecc}{0.69}
33: \newcommand{\pthreeeccpm}{0.7$\pm$0.4}
34: \newcommand{\pfouraecc}{0.47}
35: \newcommand{\pfourbecc}{0.87}
36: \newcommand{\pfourbeccpm}{0.7$\pm$0.4}
37: \newcommand{\ponemass}{1.5}
38: \newcommand{\ptwomass}{1.6}
39: \newcommand{\pthreemass}{1.7}
40: \newcommand{\pfouramass}{1.8}
41: \newcommand{\pfourbmass}{18.4}
42: \newcommand{\poneamp}{27.5}
43: \newcommand{\ptwoamp}{22.9}
44: \newcommand{\pthreeamp}{43.3}
45: \newcommand{\pfouraamp}{50.4}
46: \newcommand{\pfourbamp}{466.5}
47: \newcommand{\ponechisq}{5.11}
48: \newcommand{\ptwochisq}{5.12}
49: \newcommand{\pthreechisq}{15.22}
50: \newcommand{\pfourchisq}{1.73}
51: \newcommand{\ponenobs}{34}
52: \newcommand{\ptwonobs}{37}
53: \newcommand{\pthreenobs}{28}
54: \newcommand{\pfournobs}{28}
55: \newcommand{\ponesep}{2.4}
56: \newcommand{\ptwosep}{4.8}
57: \newcommand{\pthreesep}{2.0}
58: \newcommand{\pfourasep}{1.2}
59: \newcommand{\pfourbsep}{4.3}
60:
61: \shortauthors{O'Toole {\it et~al.\/}}
62: \shorttitle{Planets Around G Dwarfs}
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: \title{New Planets around three G Dwarfs$~^{1}$}
66:
67: \author{Simon J. O'Toole\altaffilmark{2},
68: R. Paul Butler\altaffilmark{3},
69: C. G. Tinney\altaffilmark{2},
70: Hugh R. A. Jones\altaffilmark{4},
71: Geoffrey W. Marcy\altaffilmark{5,7},
72: Brad Carter\altaffilmark{6},
73: Chris McCarthy\altaffilmark{7},
74: Jeremy Bailey\altaffilmark{8},
75: Alan J. Penny\altaffilmark{9},
76: Kevin Apps\altaffilmark{10},
77: Debra Fischer\altaffilmark{7,5}
78: }
79:
80:
81: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the
82: Anglo--Australian Telescope, Siding Spring, Australia.}
83:
84: \altaffiltext{2}{Anglo--Australian Observatory, P.O. Box 296,
85: Epping, NSW 1710, Australia}
86:
87: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie
88: Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW,
89: Washington DC, USA 20015-1305}
90:
91: \altaffiltext{4}{Centre for Astrophysics Research, University
92: of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL 10 9AB, UK}
93:
94: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
95: Berkeley, CA USA 94720}
96:
97: \altaffiltext{6}{Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern
98: Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia}
99:
100: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
101: San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA 94132}
102:
103: \altaffiltext{8}{Australian Centre for Astrobiology,
104: Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia}
105:
106: \altaffiltext{9}{University of St Andrews, School of Physics
107: and Astronomy, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK}
108:
109: \altaffiltext{10}{Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex,
110: Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK}
111:
112:
113:
114: \begin{abstract}
115: Doppler velocity measurements from the Anglo-Australian Planet Search
116: reveal planetary mass companions to HD\,23127, HD\,159868,
117: and a possible second planetary companion to HD\,154857. These stars are
118: all G dwarfs. The companions are all in eccentric orbits with periods
119: ranging from 1.2 to $>9.3$\,yr, minimum (\msini) masses ranging from 1.5 to
120: $>4.5$\,\mjup, and semimajor axes between 1 and $>4.5$\,AU. The
121: orbital parameters are updated for the inner planet to HD\,154857,
122: while continued monitoring of the outer companion is required to
123: confirm its planet status.
124: \end{abstract}
125:
126: \keywords{planetary systems -- stars: individual (HD\,23127, HD\,159868,
127: HD\,154857)}
128:
129: \section{Introduction}
130: \label{intro}
131:
132: As extrasolar planetary research enters its second decade, the field
133: continues to be driven by precision Doppler surveys. Roughly 95\%
134: of all known planets come from such surveys, including
135: all of the $\sim$180 extrasolar planets\footnote{cf. list of exoplanets orbiting
136: nearby stars at www.exoplanets.org at 1 October 2006} orbiting
137: stars within 100\,pc (Butler et al.\ 2006).
138:
139: The most promising new methods for the detection and study
140: of nearby exoplanets are the next generation techniques
141: of interferometric astrometry and direct imaging. However,
142: these have proven harder to develop
143: and implement than expected a decade ago. Over the same period
144: Doppler programs have steadily improved their precision from 10 to 1\,\ms.
145: At this level, precision Doppler surveys will remain the dominant
146: detection technique for exoplanets orbiting nearby stars for the
147: foreseeable future.
148:
149: The Anglo-Australian Planet Search (AAPS) began observing 200
150: stars in January 1998. In 2002 the program expanded from 20 to 32
151: nights per year. In response two changes were made: 60 new stars
152: were added, and observations with signal-to-noise ratios of at least
153: 200 became the goal for all survey stars.
154: The AAT target list has been published in Jones et al.\ (2002).
155:
156: A total of 26 planets have emerged from the AAT program.
157: The full set of AAT Doppler velocity measurements for these stars are
158: included in the ``Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets'' (Butler et al.\ 2006).
159: These AAT velocities have
160: already yielded a new 300 day planet orbiting HD\,160691 (Gozdiewski
161: et al.\ 2006), which has been subsequently confirmed with HARPS data
162: (Pepe et al.\ 2006). In this paper three new AAT planets are announced.
163:
164:
165:
166: \section{Observations}
167:
168: Precision Doppler velocity measurements are
169: made at the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian
170: Telescope (AAT) with the UCLES echelle spectrograph (Diego et al.\ 1990).
171: A 1\arcsec\ slit yields $\lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 50000$
172: spectra that span the wavelength range from 4820--8550\,\AA. An
173: iodine absorption cell (Marcy \& Butler 1992) provides wavelength
174: calibration from 5000 to 6100\,\AA. The spectral point-spread
175: function is derived
176: from the detailed shapes of the embedded iodine lines
177: (Valenti et al.\ 1995). The precision Doppler analysis is
178: carried out with an updated version of the technique
179: outlined by Butler et al.\ (1996).
180: The long-term underlying systematic precision of the AAPS
181: as demonstrated by stable stars
182: is 3\,\ms (see e.g. Figures 1-4 of Butler et al.\ 2001, Figure 1
183: of McCarthy et al.\ 2004, Figure 1 of Tinney et al.\ 2005).
184: Only the Doppler program at Keck has demonstrated a similar level of
185: precision on time scales of many years (see Figures in Vogt et
186: al.\ 2000, Butler et al.\ 2004, Marcy et al.\ 2005, Vogt et al.\ 2005,
187: Rivera et al.\ 2005, and Butler et al.\ 2006).
188:
189: \section{Three New Planets}
190: \label{sec:4new}
191: The physical parameters for the planet-bearing stars reported in
192: this paper are listed in Table \ref{candidprop}.
193: All three of these stars are classified as G dwarfs in the Michigan
194: Catalog (Houk \& Cowley 1975, 1978, 1982). The stellar
195: distances are from HIPPARCOS (Perryman et al.\ 1997). The estimates of
196: stellar activity (\rhk) are from Jenkins et al.\ (2006). The
197: metallicity and \vsini\ measurements are from Valenti \& Fischer
198: (2005) based on spectral synthesis matched to high-resolution
199: ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 66,000$) iodine-free ``template''
200: spectra, taken with a 0.75\arcsec\ slit. The estimates of stellar
201: mass and age are from the analysis of Takeda et al.\ (2006). The
202: estimated intrinsic stellar Doppler jitter is from our latest upgrade
203: to the calibration of Wright (2005).
204:
205: The absolute magnitudes of these stars range
206: from \Mv $=$ 3.8 to \Mv $=$ 3.0, suggesting they
207: have all begun to evolve off the main sequence, consistent with
208: their estimated stellar ages (5.6 to 8 Gyr), and with the
209: measured level of chromospheric activity and \vsini\ velocities.
210:
211: \subsection{HD\,159868}
212:
213: This star has been observed \pthreenobs\ times since being
214: added to the AAPS program when it was expanded in 2002. These data are
215: listed in Table \ref{vel159868} and shown in Figure \ref{fig4}.
216: The root-mean-square (RMS) of these velocities
217: about the mean is 29\,\ms, exceeding that expected from the photon-counting
218: internal measurement precision and stellar jitter. (The median value of the
219: internal measurement uncertainties is 1.4\,\ms, while the estimated
220: intrinsic stellar jitter for HD\,159868 of $\sim$2\,\ms.)
221:
222: We are in the process of developing a modified detection algorithm based on
223: an improved version of the Lomb-Scargle (LS) periodogram (Lomb 1976;
224: Scargle 1982). The standard LS technique estimates power in a
225: time-series of data by fitting sinusoids at fixed periods to generate
226: a periodogram. However, planets do not necessarily (indeed it would
227: seem only infrequently) lie in the circular orbits which result in
228: sinusoidal Doppler variations. Ideally one would fit Keplerians,
229: however this requires generating a periodogram which is a function of
230: both period {\em and} eccentricity.
231:
232:
233: We have therefore generated what we call ``two dimensional Keplerian
234: Lomb-Scargle'' (2DKLS) periodograms, which are formed by fitting
235: Keplerians at a grid of periods and eccentricities, and then
236: calculating power using Equation 7 of Cumming (2004). The period at
237: maximum power in the period-eccentricity plane, is then used as an
238: initial estimate for a non-linear least-squares Keplerian fit, this
239: time varying all the Keplerian free parameters until the minimum reduced
240: $\chi^2$ ($\chi^2_{\nu}$) is determined. The uncertainties quoted in
241: this paper are derived from the diagonal terms in the covariance matrix, and
242: only represent
243: a true estimation of the uncertainty on the fitted parameters in the
244: absence of degeneracy between those parameters. As a general rule,
245: Keplerian fits usually have some degeneracy between semi-amplitude
246: ($K$) and eccentricity ($e$), resulting in the uncertainty estimates
247: on those terms being a lower limit.
248:
249: Figure \ref{fig5} demonstrates the 2DKLS with the Doppler data for
250: HD\,159868. The upper panel shows the 2DKLS power spectrum in greyscale, while the
251: lower panels show the power spectrum resulting at fixed eccentricities of
252: $e=0$ (left) and \pthreeecc\ (right). The former therefore corresponds
253: to a ``standard'' Lomb-Scargle periodogram (ie. fitting sinusoids),
254: and the latter is a cut at the eccentricity corresponding to peak
255: power in the 2DKLS. The lower left panel of Figure \ref{fig5}
256: (i.e. for $e=0$) indicates maximum power at $P=1343$\,d, while that at
257: the 2DKLS peak power in the lower right panel is $P=986$\,d. The Keplerian
258: resulting from a non-linear least-squares solution is shown as a
259: dashed line in Figure \ref{fig4}, and has semi-amplitude
260: $K$=\,\pthreeamp\,\ms, giving a minimum planetary mass
261: \msini=\pthreemass\,\mjup, and a semimajor axis $a$=\pthreesep\,AU.
262:
263: Figure \ref{fig5} demonstrates some of the features
264: of the 2DKLS method. The contrast in these power
265: spectra is considerably higher at the eccentricity corresponding to
266: peak 2DKLS power than at $e=0$. Moreover,
267: the period at which the power peak occurs is significantly different. Using the
268: standard LS as an initial estimate to the non-linear Keplerian fitting process
269: does eventually generate a best-fit period near 2DKLS peak power period.
270: However, using the intial estimate derived from the 2DKLS is clearly
271: preferable.
272:
273: Throughout the remainder of this paper, when we present power spectra, these
274: will actually be cuts through the 2DKLS at the eccentricity
275: corresponding to the peak power in the 2DKLS (which is noted).
276:
277: The $\chi^2_{\nu}$ of the best-fit Keplerian is \pthreechisq, and the
278: RMS is 8.5\,\ms, which is still significantly larger than expected
279: based on internal meaurement uncertainties and jitter.
280: Though a component of this excess RMS could be due to
281: asteroseismological ``noise'' (as discussed by Tinney et al.\ 2005),
282: it is unlikely to be the sole cause. So, while the Keplerian false
283: alarm probability (FAP -- calculated as described in Marcy et
284: al.\ 2005) for this fit is quite low ($<10^{-3}$), the large
285: residuals have motivated a search for additional companions.
286:
287: Allowing for a long term linear trend makes no significant improvement
288: to the RMS or $\chi^2_{\nu}$. Planets with shorter periods can be fitted
289: simultaneously with the planet reported here, and solutions obtained that
290: significantly improve the RMS and $\chi^2_{\nu}$. For example a
291: 180\,d, \msini=0.5\,\mjup, $e$=0.05 planet reduces the joint RMS to
292: 4.5\,\ms and $\chi^2_{\nu}$ to 4.4. However, the parameters of such a
293: solution are poorly constrained by the available sampling, so no
294: definitive statement can be made about the orbital properties of a
295: possible second planet around HD\,159868.
296:
297:
298: \subsection{HD\,23127}
299:
300: HD\,23127 was added to the AAPS program in late 1998 together with 19
301: other targets, following suggestions that metal-rich stars
302: preferentially host exoplanets (see e.g. Laughlin 2000 and
303: references therein). Tinney et al.\ (2003) describes
304: this metal-rich subsample and its selection. A total of
305: \ponenobs\ observations (listed in Table 4) have been
306: taken over 7.7 years beginning 1998 October. The RMS of these
307: velocities about the mean is 25\,\ms, again exceeding that expected
308: based on photon-counting internal measurement precision and stellar
309: jitter. (The median value of the internal measurement uncertainties is
310: 4.4\,\ms; estimated stellar jitter is $\sim$2.0\,\ms.) Examination
311: of Table 4 shows how our precision (as determined by the
312: internal uncertainty estimates listed in the table) has significantly
313: improved in recent years as exposure times have been increased from
314: $\sim$5 to $\sim$20 minutes to meet our higher S/N goal.
315:
316:
317:
318: The power spectrum for HD\,23127 is shown in Figure \ref{fig2} at an
319: eccentricity of \poneecc, corresponding to peak power in the
320: 2DKLS. The peak at $\sim$1214\,d (\poneper) is clear. The best-fit
321: Keplerian is shown as the dashed line in Figure \ref{fig1}. The RMS of
322: the residuals (11.1\,\ms) and $\chi^2_\nu$ of the fit (\ponechisq) are
323: both high. These are due to the lower precision and larger scatter of
324: the earliest measurements and partially because of the star's
325: faintness. (If the residuals are divided in two, we find an RMS of
326: 13.2\,\ms\ before 2003 and 4.8\,\ms\ after.) The minimum mass
327: (\msini) of the planet is \ponemass\,\mjup, and the semi-major axis is
328: \ponesep\,AU.
329:
330:
331:
332:
333:
334: \subsection{HD\,154857}
335:
336:
337: HD\,154857 was added to our target list when the AAPS was
338: expanded in 2002. As discussed in McCarthy et al.\
339: (2004) this star has evolved about 2 magnitudes above the
340: main sequence. Based on 18 observations made between 2002 April
341: and 2004 February, McCarthy et al.\ announced a first planet
342: around this star, with a period of $\sim$400\,d, and an additional
343: linear trend suggesting a second longer period companion.
344:
345: A total of \pfournobs\ AAT observations of HD\,154857, spanning 4.5
346: years, are listed in Table 5 and plotted in Figure
347: \ref{fig7a}. The velocity RMS of the raw data set is 35\,\ms. The
348: median internal measurement uncertainty is 1.7\,\ms, and the estimated
349: stellar jitter is 2.6\,\ms. The dashed line shows the best-fit single
350: Keplerian with a linear trend, with an orbital period of 1.1\,yr and
351: an eccentricity of 0.52, in agreement with McCarthy et al. The RMS of
352: the velocities to the Keplerian plus linear trend is 7.77\,\ms\ and
353: the $\chi^2_{\nu}$ is 7.51.
354:
355: Over the past two years the combination of a single Keplerian plus
356: linear trend has provided a systematically poorer match to the data.
357: We have therefore been motivated to search for a two Keplerian
358: solution. Figure \ref{fig7} shows best-fit double Keplerian, which
359: was found by starting with the single-Keplerian parameters for the
360: known planet. The updated orbital parameters for the inner planet
361: (Table 3) from this fit are basically consistent with those
362: given by McCarthy et al.\ (2004), and with four full orbits
363: observed, these parameters are now well constrained. The fit parameters
364: for the outer planet are $P$=\pfourbper, $K$=\pfourbamp\,\ms, and
365: $e$=\pfourbecc. The minimum mass is \msini=\pfourbmass\,\mjup\ and
366: $a$=\pfourbsep\,AU. The RMS to the two Keplerian fit is 3.68\,\ms,
367: with a $\chi^2_{\nu}$ of \pfourchisq.
368: The parameters of the (outer) long-period companion of
369: HD\,154857 are not well constrained; fitting very
370: long periods leads to poorly determined eccentricities and \msini\ values in
371: the brown dwarf regime or larger. More observations are needed to
372: constrain the parameters of this object, while robust lower limits are
373: provided in Table 3.
374:
375:
376: \section{Discussion}
377:
378:
379: Thirty planets have now emerged from the 260 target stars of the AAPS,
380: suggesting that $\sim$10\% of
381: late F, G, and K field dwarfs have planets that can be detected with
382: Doppler precisions of 3\,\ms\ and a time baseline of 8 years (a similar
383: detection rate to that of the original 106 stars on the Lick Observatory
384: survey which has yielded 13 planets to date; Fischer et al.\ 2003). These
385: surveys are now beginning to explore planets in orbits beyond 4\,AU,
386: though they remain insensitive to terrestrial mass planets beyond 0.1\,AU and
387: neptune-mass planets beyond 1\,AU. However, with planets being found orbiting
388: more than 10\% of nearby sun-like stars, it seems that
389: planetary systems are common.
390:
391: For the current high precision Doppler surveys, the one detectable
392: signpost of a Solar System analog is a giant planet in a circular orbit
393: ($e<0.1$) beyond 4\,AU, with no giant planets interior to 4\,AU.
394: Previously five giant planets orbiting beyond 4\,AU have been found.
395: Of these, only 55 Cnc has an outer planet in such a
396: circular orbit, however, it also has two giant planets
397: orbiting at 0.11 and 0.23\,AU. The outer planet orbiting HD\,217107
398: (Vogt et al.\ 2005; Wittenmyer et al.\ 2006) has an eccentricity of
399: 0.55 and an interior giant planet in a 7\,d orbit.
400: The planets orbiting HD\,72659 (Butler et al.\ 2006), HD\,154345 and
401: HD\,24040 (Wright et al. 2007) have
402: eccentricities of 0.27, 0.52, and 0.20 respectively.
403:
404: In this paper an additional object, possibly a giant planet (HD\,154857c)
405: are presented, orbiting at (or beyond) 4\,AU and with quite
406: high eccentricity. Thus five of the six planets orbiting beyond 4\,AU,
407: are in eccentric orbits, and the sixth has giant planets in inner
408: orbits. The distribution of eccentricities for planets beyond 4\,AU is
409: similar to that for planets between 0.2 and 4\,AU, and there is no
410: indication of a trend for increased circularity in planets orbiting
411: at large radii. This suggests that while gas-giant planets themselves
412: are common (orbiting $\simgt$10\% of sun-like stars), Solar System analogs
413: may not be as common. Over the
414: next decade the number of planets detected beyond 4\,AU will grow
415: enabling us to determine accurately whether Solar System analogs are
416: rare or not.
417: However, to understand completely the frequency of these detections,
418: we will need to more thoroughly simulate the selection functions
419: implicit in our observing strategies.
420: The AAPS program, along with other Doppler searches, has
421: been underway for more than 8 years. To date no detailed
422: simulation and analysis of these selection functions has yet been
423: undertaken by AAPS or any other planet search. What is needed is to
424: not only determine what can be detected using our current
425: observational techniques and sampling, but what should have been
426: detected but has not been, if we are to constrain the underlying
427: frequency distributions of planets and planetary system parameters.
428: An effort in this direction is now well underway for the AAPS.
429:
430:
431:
432:
433:
434: \acknowledgements
435:
436: We gratefully acknowledge the superb technical support at the
437: Anglo-Australian Telescope which has been critical to the success of
438: this project -- in particular we acknowledge R. Paterson,
439: D. Stafford, S. Lee, J. Pogson and J. Stevenson.
440: We acknowledge support by PPARC grant PPC/C000552/1 (SJOT),
441: NSF grant AST-9988087 and
442: travel support from the Carnegie Institution of Washington (RPB),
443: NASA grant NAG5-8299 and NSF grant AST95-20443 (GWM).
444: We thank the Australian and UK Telescope assignment
445: committees (ATAC \& PATT) for generous allocations of telescope time. This
446: research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System, and the SIMBAD
447: database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
448:
449:
450: \clearpage
451:
452: \begin{thebibliography}{}
453: \parsep 0pt
454: \itemsep 0pt
455:
456: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 1996]{BuMaWi96}
457: Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Williams, E., McCarthy, C.,
458: Dosanjh, P., \& Vogt, S.~S. 1996,
459: \newblock { PASP }, {108}, 500
460:
461: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 2001]{AAT01}
462: Butler, R.~P., Tinney, C.~G., Marcy, G.~W.,
463: Jones, H.~R.~A., Penny, A.~J. \& Apps, K. 2001,
464: \newblock { ApJ }, 555, 410.
465:
466: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 2004]{GJ436}
467: Butler, R.~P., Vogt, S.~S., Marcy, G.~W.,
468: Fischer, D.~A., Wright, J.~J., Henry, G.~W.,
469: Laughlin, G. \& Lissauer, J.~J. 2004,
470: \newblock { ApJ }, 617, 580.
471:
472: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 2006]{Catalog06}
473: Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A.,
474: Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D.,
475: Johnson, J. A., McCarthy, C. \& Penny, A. J. 2006,
476: \newblock { ApJ }, 646, 505.
477:
478: \bibitem[Cumming 2004]{Cumming2004}
479: Cumming, A. 2004,
480: \newblock { MNRAS, } 354, 1165.
481:
482: \bibitem[Diego { et~al.} 1991]{diego:90}
483: Diego, F., Charalambous, A., Fish, A.~C., \& Walker, D.~D. 1990,
484: Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instr. Eng., 1235, 562
485:
486:
487: \bibitem[Fischer { et~al.} 2003]{Fischer2003}
488: Fischer, D.~A., Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P.,
489: Vogt, S.~S., Henry, G.~W., Pourbaix, D.,
490: Walp, B., Misch, A.~A. \& Wright, J.~T. 2003,
491: \newblock { ApJ, } 586, 1394.
492:
493: \bibitem[Gozdziewski { et~al.} 2006]{Goz06}
494: Gozdziewski, Maciejewski, A.~J. \& Migaszewski, C. 2006,
495: \newblock { ApJ, }, accepted.
496:
497: \bibitem[Houk \& Cowley 1975]{Houk75}
498: Houk, N. \& Cowley, A.~P. 1975,
499: {\it Michigan Catalog of Two Dimensional Spectral Types for the HD\,Stars,
500: Vol. 1},
501: (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan).
502:
503: \bibitem[Houk \& Cowley 1978]{Houk78}
504: Houk, N. \& Cowley, A.~P. 1978,
505: {\it Michigan Catalog of Two Dimensional Spectral Types for the HD\,Stars,
506: Vol. 2},
507: (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan).
508:
509: \bibitem[Houk \& Cowley 1982]{Houk82}
510: Houk, N. \& Cowley, A.~P. 1982,
511: {\it Michigan Catalog of Two Dimensional Spectral Types for the HD\,Stars,
512: Vol. 3},
513: (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan).
514:
515: \bibitem[Jenkins { et~al.} 2006]{jenkins06}
516: Jenkins, J. S., Jones, H. R. A., Tinney, C. G., Butler, R. P.,
517: McCarthy, C., Marcy, G. W., Pinfield, D. J., Carter, B. D., \&
518: Penny, A. J. 2006,
519: \newblock { MNRAS }, 372, 163.
520:
521: \bibitem[Jones 2002]{jones02}
522: Jones, H.~R.~A., Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Tinney, C.~G.,
523: Penny, A.~J., McCarthy, C., \& Carter, B.~D. 2002,
524: \newblock { MNRAS }, 337, 1170.
525:
526: \bibitem[Laughlin 2000]{laughlin00}
527: Laughlin, G. 2000,
528: \newblock { ApJ }, 545, 1064.
529:
530: \bibitem[Lomb 1976]{lomb76}
531: Lomb, N. R. 1976,
532: \newblock { Ap\&SS}, 39, 447.
533:
534: \bibitem[McCarthy { et al.} 2004]{McCarthy04}
535: McCarthy, Chris, Butler, R. Paul, Tinney, C. G., Jones, Hugh R. A.,
536: Marcy, Geoffrey W., Carter, Brad, Penny, Alan J. \&
537: Fischer, Debra A. 2004,
538: \newblock { ApJ}, 617, 575.
539:
540: \bibitem[Marcy \& Butler 1992]{MaBu92}
541: Marcy, G.~W. \& Butler, R.~P. 1992,
542: \newblock { PASP }, {104}, 270.
543:
544: \bibitem[Marcy 2005]{Marcy05}
545: Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P., Vogt, S.~S., Fischer, D.~A.,
546: Henry, G.~W., Laughlin, G., Wright, J.~T. \& Johnson, J.~A. 2005,
547: \newblock { ApJ }, {619}, 570.
548:
549: \bibitem[Perryman { et~al.} 1997]{Perry97}
550: Perryman, M.~A.~C., et al. 1997, { A\&A }, 323, L49.
551: The Hipparcos Catalog
552:
553: \bibitem[Pepe { et~al.} 2006]{pepe06}
554: Pepe, F, Correia, A., Mayor, M., Tamuz, O., Benz, W., Bertaux, J.L.,
555: Bouchy, F., Couetdic, J., Laskar, J., Lovis, C., Naef, D., Queloz, D.,
556: Santos, N., Sivan, J.P., Sosnowska, D. \& Udry, S. 2006
557: \newblock { A\&A, } accepted.
558:
559: \bibitem[Rivera { et~al.} 2005]{GJ876}
560: Rivera, E.~J., Lissauer, J.~J., Butler, R.~P.,
561: Marcy, G.~W., Vogt, S.~S., Fischer, D.~A.,
562: Brown, T.~M., Laughlin, G. \& Henry, G.~W. 2005,
563: \newblock { ApJ }, 634, 625.
564:
565: \bibitem[Scargle 1982]{scar82}
566: Scargle, J. D. 1982,
567: \newblock { ApJ }, 263, 865.
568:
569: \bibitem[Takeda 2006]{Takada06}
570: Takeda, G., Ford, E.~B., Sills, A., Rasio, F.~A.,
571: Fischer, D.~A., \& Valenti, J.~A. 2006,
572: \newblock { ApJS, } submitted.
573:
574: \bibitem[Tinney { et~al.} 2003]{TinBut03}
575: Tinney, C.~G., Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Jones, H.~R.~A.,
576: Penny, A.~J., McCarthy, C., Carter, B.~D., \& Bond, J. 2003,
577: \newblock { ApJ, } 587, 423.
578:
579: \bibitem[Tinney { et~al.} 2005]{TinBut05}
580: Tinney, C. G., Butler, R. Paul, Marcy, Geoffrey W., Jones, Hugh R. A.,
581: Penny, Alan J., McCarthy, Chris, Carter, Brad D. \& Fischer, Debra A. 2005,
582: \newblock { ApJ, } 623, 1171.
583:
584: \bibitem[Valenti { et~al.} 1995]{VaBuMa95}
585: Valenti, J., Butler, R.~P., \& Marcy, G.~W. 1995,
586: \newblock { PASP }, {107}, 966
587:
588: \bibitem[Valenti \& Fischer 2005]{ValFisch05}
589: Valenti, J. \& Fischer, D.~A. 2005,
590: \newblock { ApJS, } 159, 141.
591:
592: \bibitem[Vogt { et~al.} 2000]{vogt:00}
593: Vogt, S.~S., Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P., \& Apps,K. 2000,
594: \newblock { ApJ, } {536}, 902
595:
596: \bibitem[Vogt { et~al.} 2005]{vogt:05}
597: Vogt, S.~S., Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Fischer, D.~A.,
598: Henry, G.~W., Laughlin, G., Wright, J.~T. \& Johnson, J.~J. 2005,
599: \newblock { ApJ, } {632}, 638.
600:
601: \bibitem[Wittenmeyer { et al.} 2006]{witt06}
602: Wittenmyer, R.~A., Endl, M., \& Cochran, W.~D. 2006.
603: \newblock { ApJ }, in press.
604:
605: \bibitem[Wright 2005]{Wright05}
606: Wright, J.~T. 2005,
607: \newblock { PASP }, {117}, 657.
608:
609: \bibitem[Wright { et~al.} 2007]{wrighta:04}
610: Wright, J.~T., Marcy, G.~W., Fischer, D.~A., Butler, R.~P., Vogt,
611: S.~S., Tinney, C.~G., Jones, H.~R.~A., Carter, B.~D., Johnson, J.~A.
612: McCarthy, C. \& Apps, K. 2007,
613: \newblock { ApJ, } in press, to appear in 20 Feb 2007 issue 656.
614:
615: \end{thebibliography}
616:
617: \clearpage
618: \begin{figure}
619: \plotone{fig1.eps}
620: \caption{2D Keplerian Lomb-Scargle (2DKLS) periodogram for HD\,159868.
621: The upper panel shows the 2DKLS, the lower left panel shows
622: the power spectrum generated at $e=0$, and the lower right panel
623: shows the power spectrum at $e=\pthreeecc$ corresponding to the peak
624: power in the 2DKLS. The power spectrum
625: at $e=\pthreeecc$ clearly shows higher contrast, and a different period
626: to that at $e=0$ (which corresponds to a ``standard'' Lomb-Scargle periodigram).}
627: \label{fig5}
628: \end{figure}
629:
630: \begin{figure}
631: \plotone{fig2.eps}
632: \caption{Keplerian fit to HD\,159868. The RMS to a single Keplerian
633: model is significantly higher than the internal measurement error,
634: which combined with the high $\chi^2_{\nu}$ is suggestive of a second companion.}
635: \label{fig4}
636: \end{figure}
637:
638:
639: \begin{figure}
640: \plotone{fig3.eps}
641: \caption{Doppler velocities for HD\,23127, with the best--fit
642: Keplerian (dashed line). Most of the scatter in the Keplerian fit is due to
643: first epoch observations. The observations taken over the first few
644: years have signal--to--noise of $\sim$50, compared to later observations
645: with S/N $\sim$100.}
646: \label{fig1}
647: \end{figure}
648:
649: \begin{figure}
650: \plotone{fig4.eps}
651: \caption{2D Keplerian Lomb-Scargle periodogram for HD\,23127 at
652: $e$=\poneecc\ showing significant power at 1214\,d or \poneper.
653: }
654: \label{fig2}
655: \end{figure}
656:
657:
658: \begin{figure}
659: \plotone{fig5.eps}
660: \caption{A single Keplerian fit including a linear trend for
661: HD\,154857. There is still a systematic variation present in the
662: residuals and their RMS is still much higher than the internal measurement
663: uncertainties.}
664: \label{fig7a}
665: \end{figure}
666:
667: \begin{figure}
668: \plotone{fig6.eps}
669: \caption{A double Keplerian fit for HD\,154857. Fitting the second
670: planet significantly improves the $\chi^2_{\nu}$, although its period and
671: eccentricity are not well constrained.}
672: \label{fig7}
673: \end{figure}
674:
675: \clearpage
676:
677: \input{tab1.tex}
678:
679: \clearpage
680:
681: \input{tab2.tex}
682:
683: \clearpage
684:
685: \input{tab3.tex}
686:
687: \clearpage
688:
689: \input{tab4.tex}
690:
691: \clearpage
692:
693: \input{tab5.tex}
694:
695: \end{document}
696:
697: