1: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \title[Spectral indices of Galactic radio loops]
5: {Spectral indices of Galactic radio loops between 1420, 820 and 408
6: MHz}
7:
8: \author[V. Borka]{V. Borka\thanks{E-mail: vborka@vin.bg.ac.yu} \\
9: Laboratory of Physics (010), Vin\v ca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, P.
10: O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia }
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \date{Accepted 2006 December 27. Received 2006 December 17; in original form 2005 December 7}
16:
17: \pagerange{1--10}
18: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}
19: \pubyear{2007}
20:
21: \maketitle
22:
23: \label{firstpage}
24:
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: In this paper the average brightness temperatures and surface
28: brightnesses at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz of the six main Galactic
29: radio-continuum loops are derived, as are their radio spectral
30: indices. The temperatures and surface brightnesses of the radio
31: loops are computed using data taken from radio continuum surveys at
32: 1420, 820 and 408 MHz. We have demonstrated the reality of Loops V
33: and VI and present diagrams of their spectra for the first time. We
34: derived the radio spectral indices of Galactic radio loops from
35: radio surveys at three frequencies (1420, 820 and 408 MHz) and
36: confirm them to be non-thermal sources. Diameters and distances of
37: Loops I-VI were also calculated. The results obtained are in good
38: agreement with current theories of supernova remnant (SNR) evolution
39: and suggest that radio loops may have a SNR origin.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42:
43: \begin{keywords}
44: surveys -- supernova remnants -- radio continuum: ISM -- ISM:
45: kinematics and dynamics -- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal.
46: \end{keywords}
47:
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: The fact that some radio spurs can be joined into small circles is
52: very well known. The sets of spurs which form small circles are
53: called loops. During the early seventies, four major loops were
54: recognized. Their discoveries and studies took place in this order:
55: Loop I (\citet{larg62}; \citet{hasl64}; \citet{larg66};
56: \citet{salt70}), Loop II (\citet{larg62}; \citet{quig65};
57: \citet{salt70}), Loop III (\citet{quig65}; \citet{salt70}) and Loop
58: IV (\citet{larg66}; \citet{salt70}; \citet{reic81}). Salter in 1970.
59: gave the most precise determination of these circles' parameters,
60: which were later published in \citet{berk71a}. The data Salter used
61: were the best available at the time at 408, 404, 240 and 178 MHz. A
62: detailed review of the subject was published by \citet{salt83}.
63: \citet{jmt72, jmt82} and \citet{jmt97} made an observation that some
64: other spurs could be connected into loops. They proposed Loop V to
65: be formed by negative latitude spurs in Taurus, Pisces and Pegasus
66: and Loop VI to correspond to the weak positive latitudes spurs in
67: Leo and Cancer. Using the survey at 38 MHz by \citet{jmt73} they
68: computed parameters of the proposed loops.
69:
70: In order to study the structure of Galactic radio loop emission, it
71: is necessary to determine their spectral indices. The differential
72: spectral indices of the North Polar Spur (NPS), the spurs in
73: Aquarius, Pegasus and Taurus were derived using data at 1420, 408
74: and 38 MHz \citep{jmt95a, jmt95b}. The technique used was that of
75: temperature-temperature plots ($T-T$ plots). \citet{berk71} gives
76: indices for the spurs seen on her survey. \citet{jmt82} derived
77: differential temperature spectral indices between 404 and 38 MHz.
78:
79: Spectral index variations of the Galactic radio continuum emission
80: were discussed in several papers. \citet{laws87} has studied these
81: variations across the northern sky between 1420 and 38 MHz and
82: suggested that the obtained values (about 2.5) are mainly due to the
83: effects of Loops I and III. Also, \citet{reic88a} used radio
84: continuum surveys at 1420 and 408 MHz to calculate a map of spectral
85: indices across the northern sky and found significant variations
86: between 2.3 and 3.0. The steepest spectra corresponded to the North
87: Polar Spur and Loop III. The same authors \citep{reic88b} gave the
88: estimation $\beta > 2.8$ for Loops I and III which are believed to
89: be nearby, very old supernova remnants. These estimates were mostly
90: derived using the method of $T-T$ plots over areas of the sky where
91: no strong local features are superposed on the general Galactic
92: background. \citet{webs74} studied the spectrum of the galactic
93: non-thermal background radiation using observations at 408, 610 and
94: 1407 MHz and found that the mean differential temperature spectral
95: index was close to 2.8.
96:
97: With the aim of studying spectral indices of the major radio loops
98: I-IV, as well as of the radio loops V and VI, we used radio
99: continuum surveys at three frequencies: 1420 MHz \citep{reic86}, 820
100: MHz \citep{berk72}, 408 MHz \citep{hasl82} and calculated the
101: corresponding mean temperatures and brightnesses. Knowing three
102: values of brightnesses, the spectral indices could be calculated as
103: coefficients of linear fits to logaritmic temperature versus
104: frequency plots. Until now, there were no generated spectra using
105: mean temperatures for (at least) two different frequencies, as is
106: necessary for forming the simplest linear kind of spectrum. All
107: earlier determinations of the radio loop spectral indices were based
108: on $T-T$ methods. The reality of Loops I-VI is investigated by
109: comparing the values of their spectral indices with earlier
110: mentioned studies of spectral indices distribution across the
111: northern sky. In addition, diameters and distances of Loops I-VI were
112: calculated using the $\Sigma - D$ relation for SNRs given by
113: \citet{case98}.
114:
115:
116: \section{Data}
117:
118: The surveys at 1420 MHz \citep{reic86} and 820 MHz \citep{berk72}
119: and at 408 MHz \citep{hasl82} provided the database for the
120: recomputing of small circles for the major loops. The data were
121: obtained from the 1420-MHz Stockert survey \citep{reic86}, the
122: 820-MHz Dwingeloo survey \citep{berk72} and the 408-MHz all-sky
123: survey \citep{hasl82}. The angular resolutions are 35$'$ and 1$^\circ$.2
124: and 0$^\circ$.85, respectively. The effective sensitivities are about
125: 50 mK T$_\mathrm{b}$ (T$_\mathrm{b}$ is for an average brightness
126: temperature) at 1420 MHz, 0.20 K at 820 MHz, and about 1.0 K at 408
127: MHz. These data are available$_{}$ on MPIfR's Survey Sampler (''Max
128: -- Planck -- Institut f\"{u}r Radioastronomie'', Bonn). This is an
129: on-line service (http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/survey.html), which
130: allows users to pick a region of the sky and obtain images at a
131: number of wavelengths.
132:
133:
134: \section{Analysis}
135:
136: The 1420, 820 and 408 MHz continuum surveys specified in Section 2
137: were used to derive brightness temperature vs frequency spectra, and
138: the spectral indices of Loops I-VI were derived from these.
139:
140: The average brightness temperatures of the Loops at the three
141: frequencies were estimated from the survey data. The areas of the
142: loops were divided into different sections (corresponding to spurs)
143: and estimates for these sections were combined. The longitude and
144: latitude ranges which include spurs of the Loops I-VI are given in
145: Table \ref{tab01}. The areas inside the spurs were chosen using the
146: three surveys specified above. Background radiation was subtracted
147: in this way. First, the temperature of the loop plus background was
148: determined. Next, the background alone near the loop was estimated.
149: Finally, we calculated the difference of these values to yield the
150: average temperature of the loop.
151:
152: Average 1420, 820 and 408 MHz brightness temperatures and surface
153: brightnesses derived assuming the Rayleigh-Jeans approximation to
154: hold, are presented in Table \ref{tab02}.
155:
156: Assuming the spectra to have a power-law form:
157:
158: \begin{equation}
159: T_\mathrm{b} = K \nu ^{-\beta}
160: \end{equation}
161:
162:
163: \noindent
164: we get:
165:
166: \begin{equation}
167: \log T_\mathrm{b} = \log K -\beta \log \nu
168: \end{equation}
169: \noindent where $\beta $ is spectral index and K is a constant.
170: Knowing three values of brightnesses (derived in this paper) we
171: were able to derive spectral indices from fitting equation (2) to
172: the data. The results are given in Table \ref{tab03}.
173:
174:
175: Temperatures at 1 GHz were calculated by use of the spectral
176: indices:
177:
178: \begin{equation}
179: T_\mathrm{1GHz} / T_\mathrm{\nu GHz} = (1. / \nu) ^{-\beta}
180: \end{equation}
181:
182: \noindent We have converted these values that have been
183: extrapolated to 1 GHz into surface brightness and present them in
184: Table \ref{tab04}.
185:
186:
187: \section{Method of calculation}
188:
189: The areas used to represent the individual loops were obtained from
190: the radio continuum map of \citet{reic86} in such a way that they
191: contain the brightness temperature contours enclosing the spur
192: features that define the loop. The longitude and latitude ranges of
193: each are given in Table \ref{tab01}. Contour lines which correspond
194: to the minimum and maximum brightness temperatures for each spur,
195: are taken to define their borders. T$_\mathrm{min}$ is the lower
196: temperature limit between the background and the spur and
197: T$_\mathrm{max}$ is the upper temperature limit between the spur and
198: unrelated confusing sources (superposed on the spur and hence
199: requiring elimination from the calculation). In this manner
200: background radiation was considered as radiation that would exist if
201: there were no spurs. We used averages over the data within these two
202: curves: the contour for T$_\mathrm{min}$ and the contour for
203: T$_\mathrm{max}$.
204:
205: For evaluating brightness temperatures of the background, we used
206: all measured values below T$_\mathrm{min}$, inside the corresponding
207: intervals of Galactic longitude (l) and Galactic latitude (b), and
208: lying on the outer side of a spur. The value of T$_\mathrm{b}$ is
209: approximately constant near a spur. For evaluating the brightness
210: temperatures of a loop including the background, we used all
211: measured values between T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$ inside
212: the corresponding regions of l and b. If the value of
213: T$_\mathrm{min}$ (or T$_\mathrm{max}$) is changed by a small amount,
214: say approximately $2 \times \Delta T$ (i.e. 0.1 K for 1420 MHz, 0.4
215: K for 820 MHz and 2 K for 408 MHz), the brightness contours become
216: significantly different. If T$_\mathrm{min}$ is too small, the area
217: of the spur becomes confused with the background and it becomes
218: obvious that the border has been incorrectly chosen. If
219: T$_\mathrm{max}$ is too large, the area of the spur includes
220: significant contributions from unrelated confusing sources. Mean
221: brightness temperatures for spurs are found by subtracting the mean
222: values of background brightness temperature from the mean values of
223: the brightness temperature over the areas of the spurs.
224:
225: We calculated the mean background levels over regions not too far
226: outside the spurs because the loops are moving through regions of
227: the interstellar medium where earlier supernova remnants are likely
228: to have passed, i.e. through a low density medium produced by
229: earlier SNRs (or other energetic phenomena) \citep{mcke77, salt83}.
230:
231: We used averages over the defined areas and subtracted from these
232: the average values for the background regions obtained as
233: described above.
234:
235:
236: \begin{table*}
237: \centering
238: \caption{The Galactic longitude and latitude for spurs
239: belonging to Loops I-VI and the lower and upper temperature limits
240: for these loops.}
241: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
242: \hline
243: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{label of}&
244: \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{~~~~~~~~l,b intervals}}&
245: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{1420 MHz}} &
246: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{820 MHz}} &
247: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{408 MHz}} \\
248: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{the loop}&
249: \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{~~~~~~~~for spurs ($^\circ$)}}&
250: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{temperature limits (K)} &
251: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{temperature limits (K)} &
252: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{temperature limits (K)} \\
253: \cline{4-9}
254: &
255: \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{} & T$_\mathrm{min}$& T$_\mathrm{max}$&
256: T$_\mathrm{min}$& T$_\mathrm{max}$& T$_\mathrm{min}$& T$_\mathrm{max}$ \\
257: \hline
258: \hline
259: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{\textbf{Loop I}}&
260: l = [40, 0]&
261: b = [18, 78]&
262: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.6}&
263: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{4.1}&
264: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{7.8}&
265: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{9.5}&
266: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{30.0}&
267: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{40.0} \\
268: & l = [360, 327]& b = [67, 78]& & & & & & \\
269: \hline
270: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{\textbf{Loop II}}&
271: l = [57, 30]&
272: b = [-50, -10]&
273: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.6}&
274: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{4.2}&
275: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{7.2}&
276: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{9.9}&
277: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{24.0}&
278: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{36.0} \\
279: & l = [195, 130]& b = [-70, -2]& & & & & & \\
280: \hline
281: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{\textbf{Loop III}}&
282: l = [180, 135]&
283: b = [2, 50]&
284: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.4}&
285: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{4.2}&
286: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{6.4}&
287: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{10.0}&
288: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{21.0}&
289: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{38.0} \\
290: & l = [135, 110]& b = [40, 55]& & & & & & \\
291: & l = [110, 70]& b = [6, 50]& & & & & & \\
292: \hline
293: \textbf{Loop IV}&
294: l = [325, 285]&
295: b = [55, 72]&
296: 3.58&
297: 4.0&
298: 7.45&
299: 7.95&
300: 27.5&
301: 30.0 \\
302: \hline
303: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{\textbf{Loop V}}&
304: l = [189, 178]&
305: b = [-25, -13]&
306: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.6}&
307: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.8}&
308: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{7.1}&
309: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{7.8}&
310: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{24.0}&
311: \raisebox{-3.00ex}[0cm][0cm]{33.5} \\
312: & l = [147, 133]& b = [-50, -39]& & & & & & \\
313: & l = [90, 80]& b = [-39, -24]& & & & & & \\
314: \hline
315: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{\textbf{Loop VI}}&
316: l = [215, 205]&
317: b = [29, 40]&
318: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.38}&
319: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{3.58}&
320: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{5.8}&
321: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{6.9}&
322: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{15.0}&
323: \raisebox{-1.50ex}[0cm][0cm]{23.5} \\
324: & l = [207, 196]& b = [6, 32]& & & & & & \\
325: \hline
326: \end{tabular}
327: \label{tab01}
328: \end{table*}
329:
330:
331:
332: The areas over which an average brightness temperature is determined
333: at each of the three frequencies are taken to be as similar as
334: possible within the limits of measurement accuracy. Moreover, in
335: some cases (e.g. at 1420 MHz for Loops IV and VI), we used values of
336: T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$ which are below this limit
337: (see Table \ref{tab01}) in order to make the corresponding areas the
338: most comparable. However, some differences between these areas still
339: remain and we think that the major causes of differing borders
340: between the three frequencies are small random and systematic errors
341: in the calibrated data.
342:
343:
344:
345: \section{Results}
346:
347: The results for the six loops are presented in Tables \ref{tab02}
348: and \ref{tab03}. Table \ref{tab02} shows calculated average
349: brightness temperatures and surface brightnesses at 1420, 820 and
350: 408 MHz. These results are in good agreement with results obtained
351: by \citet{berk73}, only that the present results are obtained with
352: more sample points. As one can see from Table \ref{tab01}, the first
353: two regions of Loop V are located inside the area of Loop II. The
354: results corresponding to these two loops, presented in Table
355: \ref{tab02}, are calculated out of their overlapping regions.
356: However, we also performed calculations for complete areas of Loops
357: II and V (including overlapping regions) and obtained practically
358: the same results for Loop II. In the case of the whole Loop V, the
359: results for $T_\mathrm{b}$ are slightly different from those given
360: in Table \ref{tab02}: 0.14 K at 1420 MHz, 0.51 K at 820 MHz and 5.1
361: K at 408 MHz. This difference is probably caused by superposition of
362: radiation from both loops. Spectra are presented in Figs 1 -- 6,
363: with Table \ref{tab03} giving the spectral indices computed for
364: Loops I-VI.
365:
366:
367:
368: \begin{table*}
369: \centering
370: \caption{Temperatures (K) and brightnesses
371: (10$^{-22}$~W\,m$^{-2}$\,Hz$^{-1}$\,Sr$^{-1}$) of the radio loops
372: at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, respectively.}
373: \begin{tabular}
374: {|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
375: \hline
376: label of &
377: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{1420 MHz}} &
378: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{820 MHz}} &
379: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{408 MHz}} \\
380: \cline{2-7}
381: the loop & temperature& brightness&
382: temperature& brightness&
383: temperature& brightness \\
384: \hline
385: \hline
386: \textbf{Loop I}&
387: 0.27 $\pm $ 0.05&
388: 1.69 $\pm $ 0.30&
389: 1.35 $\pm $ 0.20&
390: 2.78 $\pm $ 0.40&
391: 8.4 $\pm $ 1.0&
392: 4.31 $\pm $ 0.50 \\
393: \hline
394: \textbf{Loop II}&
395: 0.22 $\pm $ 0.05&
396: 1.36 $\pm $ 0.30&
397: 1.10 $\pm $ 0.20&
398: 2.26 $\pm $ 0.40&
399: 8.0 $\pm $ 1.0&
400: 4.07 $\pm $ 0.50 \\
401: \hline
402: \textbf{Loop III}&
403: 0.30 $\pm $ 0.05&
404: 1.84 $\pm $ 0.30&
405: 1.39 $\pm $ 0.20&
406: 2.87 $\pm $ 0.40&
407: 8.5 $\pm $ 1.0&
408: 4.34 $\pm $ 0.50 \\
409: \hline
410: \textbf{Loop IV}&
411: 0.08 $\pm $ 0.05&
412: 0.48 $\pm $ 0.30&
413: 0.53 $\pm $ 0.20&
414: 1.09 $\pm $ 0.40&
415: 3.0 $\pm $ 1.0&
416: 1.52 $\pm $ 0.50 \\
417: \hline
418: \textbf{Loop V}&
419: 0.13 $\pm $ 0.05&
420: 0.80 $\pm $ 0.30&
421: 0.58 $\pm $ 0.20&
422: 1.19 $\pm $ 0.40&
423: 5.6 $\pm $ 1.0&
424: 2.86 $\pm $ 0.50 \\
425: \hline
426: \textbf{Loop VI}&
427: 0.12 $\pm $ 0.05&
428: 0.71 $\pm $ 0.30&
429: 0.62 $\pm $ 0.20&
430: 1.29 $\pm $ 0.40&
431: 4.3 $\pm $ 1.0&
432: 2.20 $\pm $ 0.50 \\
433: \hline
434: \end{tabular}
435: \label{tab02}
436: \end{table*}
437:
438:
439:
440: The values of brightness obtained at different frequencies can be
441: inter-compared after using the spectral indices of Table \ref{tab03}
442: to reduce them to the values expected at 1 GHz. The good agreement
443: shown by such an inter-comparison is obvious (Table \ref{tab04}).
444:
445: When comparing these results with values calculated at other
446: frequencies, and when all results for temperatures are estimated at
447: 1 GHz, the good agreement of these results is obvious (Table
448: \ref{tab04}). The spectra presented in Figs 1 - 6 are good
449: approximations to simple power-law (straight) spectra between 408,
450: 820 and 1420 MHz, in all but one case, that of Loop IV. The reason
451: for this might be the large relative error of the estimated
452: brightness temperature. A number of effects \citep{pach70} may play
453: some role in shaping the spectra of the loops at low frequency. From
454: analysis of differential spectral indices over a range of
455: frequencies, it has been concluded that the spectra of radio loops
456: are curved at low frequencies \citep{jmt95a,jmt95b}. From Figs 1 --
457: 6 it can be seen that there is little spectral curvature between 408
458: and 1420 MHz, and that the data agree well with a linear fit. This
459: is the first spectral investigation of Loops V and VI to be
460: performed in this way. The spectral indices obtained for each of the
461: loops are $> 2.6$, confirming that their radio emissions all have a
462: non-thermal origin.
463:
464:
465:
466: \begin{figure}
467: \centering
468: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1.eps}
469: \caption{Loop I spectrum: temperature versus frequency, for three
470: measurements -- at 408, 820 and 1420 MHz. Relative errors of the
471: measurements $\Delta \log T = \frac{{\Delta T}}{{T \ln 10}}$ are
472: presented by error bars, where $\Delta T$ are the corresponding
473: absolute errors given in Table $\ref{tab02}$.}
474: \label{fig01}
475: \end{figure}
476:
477:
478: \begin{figure}
479: \centering
480: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2.eps}
481: \caption{The same as in Fig. $\ref{fig01}$, but for Loop II.}
482: \label{fig02}
483: \end{figure}
484:
485:
486: \begin{figure}
487: \centering
488: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig3.eps}
489: \caption{The same as in Fig. $\ref{fig01}$, but for Loop III.}
490: \label{fig03}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493:
494: \begin{figure}
495: \centering
496: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig4.eps}
497: \caption{The same as in Fig. $\ref{fig01}$, but for Loop IV.}
498: \label{fig04}
499: \end{figure}
500:
501:
502: \begin{figure}
503: \centering
504: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig5.eps}
505: \caption{The same as in Fig. $\ref{fig01}$, but for Loop V.}
506: \label{fig05}
507: \end{figure}
508:
509:
510: \begin{figure}
511: \centering
512: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig6.eps}
513: \caption{The same as in Fig. $\ref{fig01}$, but for Loop VI.}
514: \label{fig06}
515: \end{figure}
516:
517:
518:
519: Assuming that the radio loops are SNRs, they should follow the
520: $\Sigma - D$ (surface brightness -- diameter) relation for supernova
521: remnants. We have used the relation derived by \citet{case98} to
522: compute diameters of the Loops I-VI:
523:
524: \begin{equation}
525: \Sigma _{1\mathrm{GHz}} = 2.82\cdot 10^{ {\rm -} 17} D^{ {\rm -}
526: 2.41}
527: \end{equation}
528:
529: \noindent and then for computing distances we use the relation:
530:
531: \begin{equation}
532: r = D / (2 \sin \theta )
533: \end{equation}
534:
535:
536: \noindent with angular radii ($\theta )$ taken from \citet{jmt72}.
537: The results are given in Table \ref{tab05}. The largest SNRs that
538: \citet{case98} used to derive their $\Sigma - D$ relation had
539: diameters of about 100 pc, and 1-GHz brightnesses of about $3 \cdot
540: 10^{-22}~W\,m^{-2}\,Hz^{-1}\,Sr^{-1}$. Hence, the application of
541: their relation to the Loops (with $\Sigma _{1\mathrm{GHz}} < 2.5
542: \cdot 10^{-22}~W\,m^{-2}\,Hz^{-1}\,Sr^{-1}$ from Table \ref{tab04})
543: contains an element of extrapolation.
544:
545:
546:
547: \begin{table}
548: \centering
549: \caption{Spectral indices of radio loops, between 1420, 820 and 408 MHz.}
550: \begin{tabular}
551: {|l|c|}
552: \hline
553: label of the loop&
554: $\beta$ \\
555: \hline
556: \hline
557: \textbf{Loop I}&
558: 2.74 $\pm $ 0.08 \\
559: \hline
560: \textbf{Loop II}&
561: 2.88 $ \pm $ 0.03 \\
562: \hline
563: \textbf{Loop III}&
564: 2.68 $ \pm $ 0.06 \\
565: \hline
566: \textbf{Loop IV}&
567: 2.90 $ \pm $ 0.28 \\
568: \hline
569: \textbf{Loop V}&
570: 3.03 $ \pm $ 0.15 \\
571: \hline
572: \textbf{Loop VI}&
573: 2.90 $ \pm $ 0.09 \\
574: \hline
575: \end{tabular}
576: \label{tab03}
577: \end{table}
578:
579:
580:
581:
582: \begin{table}
583: \centering
584: \caption{Brightnesses
585: (10$^{-22}$~W\,m$^{-2}$\,Hz$^{-1}$\,Sr$^{-1}$) reduced to 1000
586: MHz.}
587: \begin{tabular}
588: {|l|c|c|c|}
589: \hline
590: label &
591: \textbf{1420 MHz}&
592: \textbf{820 MHz}&
593: \textbf{408 MHz} \\
594: of the&
595: reduced to&
596: reduced to&
597: reduced to \\
598: loop&
599: \textbf{1000 MHz}&
600: \textbf{1000 MHz}&
601: \textbf{1000 MHz} \\
602: \hline
603: \hline
604: \textbf{Loop I}&
605: 2.19 $\pm $ 0.72&
606: 2.40 $\pm $ 0.47&
607: 2.22 $\pm $ 0.42 \\
608: \hline
609: \textbf{Loop II}&
610: 1.85 $\pm $ 0.45&
611: 1.90 $\pm $ 0.34&
612: 1.85 $\pm $ 0.26 \\
613: \hline
614: \textbf{Loop III}&
615: 2.32 $\pm $ 0.62&
616: 2.50 $\pm $ 0.38&
617: 2.36 $\pm $ 0.40 \\
618: \hline
619: \textbf{Loop IV}&
620: 0.66 $\pm $ 0.74&
621: 0.91 $\pm $ 0.39&
622: 0.68 $\pm $ 0.42 \\
623: \hline
624: \textbf{Loop V}&
625: 1.15 $\pm $ 0.46&
626: 0.97 $\pm $ 0.34&
627: 1.14 $\pm $ 0.24 \\
628: \hline
629: \textbf{Loop VI}&
630: 0.98 $\pm $ 0.41&
631: 1.08 $\pm $ 0.34&
632: 0.98 $\pm $ 0.26 \\
633: \hline
634: \end{tabular}
635: \label{tab04}
636: \end{table}
637:
638:
639:
640: The smallest values of $\beta$ occur in the coldest parts of the sky
641: and the spectral index in the vicinity of Loops I and III is steeper
642: than the spectrum of the background emission. A qualitative
643: explanation of the steepening of the spectrum of emission apparently
644: associated with the Loops I and III has been put forward in terms of
645: diffusive shock-front acceleration \citep{laws87}: there is
646: compression of the interstellar cosmic ray electrons and magnetic
647: field behind a cooling SNR shock front. The resulting map of
648: \citet{reic88a} shows variations of the spectral index between
649: $\beta = 2.3$ and $\beta = 3.0$ and that the areas with steepest
650: spectra are those of the North Polar Spur and of Loop III.
651:
652: When comparing the derived spectral indices with those of the
653: Galactic background (about 2.5 between 408 and 38 MHz, given in
654: \citet{laws87}), we can see from Table \ref{tab03} that these radio
655: loops have steeper, but not much steeper, spectra (about
656: $2.7 < \beta < 2.9$), which provides evidence for the loops being
657: very old SNRs.
658:
659: The values for the brightness-temperature spectral indices of the
660: loops are rather steep (about $2.7 < \beta < 3.0 $). This is at the
661: high end of the spectral index distribution for SNRs in the range l
662: = [$360^{o}, 180^{o}$] and $D < 36\ pc $ given by \citet{clar76},
663: which has a mean T$_\mathrm{b}$ spectral index of 2.45. This might
664: be evidence for the steepening of SNR spectra with age, although
665: some authors (see e.g. \citet{clar76}) think there is no indication
666: that the spectral index is correlated with any other features of the
667: SNR.
668:
669:
670:
671: \begin{table*}
672: \centering
673: \caption{Diameters (pc) and distances (pc) of the radio
674: loops derived from the $\Sigma - D$ relation given by
675: \citet{case98}. Diameters and distances are calculated from
676: brightnesses at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz respectively, when reduced to
677: 1 GHz. In the last two columns there are average values of the
678: diameters and distances of the radio loops.}
679: \begin{tabular}
680: {|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline label of &
681: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{1420 MHz}} &
682: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{820 MHz}} &
683: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{408 MHz}} &
684: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{average}} \\
685: \cline{2-9} the loop & diameter& distance& diameter& distance&
686: diameter& distance& diameter& distance \\
687: \hline \hline \textbf{Loop I}& 132 $\pm $ 20& 77 $\pm $ 14& 127
688: $\pm $ 19& 74 $\pm $ 13& 131 $\pm $ 20&
689: 77 $\pm $ 14& 130 $\pm $ 20& 76 $\pm $ 14 \\
690: \hline \textbf{Loop II}& 141 $\pm $ 22& 97 $\pm $ 18& 140 $\pm $
691: 21& 97 $\pm $ 18& 141 $\pm $ 22&
692: 98 $\pm $ 18& 141 $\pm $ 22 & 97 $\pm $ 18 \\
693: \hline \textbf{Loop III}& 129 $\pm $ 20& 115 $\pm $ 24& 125 $\pm $
694: 19& 112 $\pm $ 23& 128 $\pm $ 20&
695: 115 $\pm $ 23& 127 $\pm $ 22 & 114 $\pm $ 24 \\
696: \hline \textbf{Loop IV}& 218 $\pm $ 33& 325 $\pm $ 67& 190 $\pm $
697: 29& 283 $\pm $ 58& 214 $\pm $ 32&
698: 319 $\pm $ 65& 207 $\pm $ 32 & 309 $\pm $ 64 \\
699: \hline \textbf{Loop V}& 172 $\pm $ 26& 91 $\pm $ 16& 185 $\pm $
700: 28& 98 $\pm $ 17& 173 $\pm $ 26&
701: 91 $\pm $ 16& 177 $\pm $ 27 & 93 $\pm $ 17 \\
702: \hline \textbf{Loop VI}& 184 $\pm $ 28& 97 $\pm $ 17& 177 $\pm $
703: 27& 93 $\pm $ 16& 184 $\pm $ 28&
704: 97 $\pm $ 17& 182 $\pm $ 28 & 96 $\pm $ 17 \\
705: \hline
706: \end{tabular}
707: \label{tab05}
708: \end{table*}
709:
710:
711:
712:
713: \section{Conclusions}
714:
715: In this paper we have calculated the temperatures and surface
716: brightnesses of the Galactic radio loops at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz.
717: We are supposing all radio loops to be SNRs (\citet{berk70};
718: \citet{berk71}; \citet{shkl71}; \citet{salt83}). Our results are
719: consistent with the SNR hypothesis and suggest that the radio loops
720: may have a SNR origin. We have used data from the northern part of
721: the radio survey at 1420 MHz \citep{reic86} and at 820 MHz
722: \citep{berk72}, and the all-sky survey at 408 MHz \citep{hasl82}.
723: Spectra (temperature versus frequency) have been plotted and these
724: are used to determine spectral indices for the main Galactic loops.
725:
726: The effective sensitivity of the brightness temperatures are: 1.0 K
727: for 408 MHz, 0.2 K for 820 MHz, and about 50 mK T$_\mathrm{b}$ for
728: 1420 MHz. The most precise measurements (the least relative errors)
729: are in case of 1420 MHz, so positions of the brightness temperature
730: contours of the loops are the most realistic for this frequency.
731: Brightnesses of the radio loops at 408 and 820 and 1420 MHz are in
732: good agreement when reduced to 1 GHz.
733:
734: We have demonstrated the reality of Loop V and Loop VI. We have also
735: calculated the temperatures, surface brightnesses and spectral
736: indices.
737:
738:
739: The spectral indices that we derived can be compared with values
740: derived by \citet{reic88b} for Loops I and III. They discussed the
741: distribution of spectral indices of the Galactic radio continuum
742: emission between 1420 and 408 MHz across the northern sky, as well
743: as the global properties of the Galactic spectral index variations.
744: Our results for spectral indices can also be compared with
745: \citet{berk73} for Loops I-IV. We note that our values for spectral
746: indices are in between the corresponding values for Loops I and III
747: given in papers \citet{reic88b} and \citet{berk73}.
748:
749: In this paper, we present the first radio continuum spectra for
750: the main radio loops, plus Loops V and VI, made using average
751: brightness temperatures at three different frequencies. We find
752: that good linear fits can be made to each of these, supplying
753: accurate spectral indices.
754:
755: With calculated radio spectral indices, we were able to estimate
756: diameters of these loops and distances to them. That the radio
757: spectra of the loops are fitted rather well by power-low spectra
758: is consistent with a SNR origin for these features.
759: \newline \\
760: Fig. A1 in the Appendix shows temperature scales in K, for 1420, 820
761: and 408 MHz. Figs A2 -- A7 in the Appendix show Loops I-VI at 1420,
762: 820 and 408 MHz, with two contours representing the temperatures
763: T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$ as given in Table \ref{tab01}.
764: Borders between the three frequencies are somewhat different for
765: each loop probably due to small, random and systematic errors in the
766: calibrated data. Also, we suppose there are uncertainties of about
767: 0.1 K in the border of spurs due to measurement errors, and there is
768: a tiny difference in the absorption of radio emission in the
769: interstellar medium at different wavelengths \citep{pach70}.
770:
771: %\clearpage
772: %\vfil
773:
774: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
775: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Berkhuijsen}{1971}]
776: {berk71} Berkhuijsen E.M., 1971, A\&A, 14, 359
777:
778: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Berkhuijsen}{1972}]
779: {berk72} Berkhuijsen E.M., 1972, A\&AS, 5, 263
780:
781: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Berkhuijsen}{1973}]
782: {berk73} Berkhuijsen E.M., 1973, A\&A, 24, 143
783:
784: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Berkhuijsen et al.}{1970}]
785: {berk70} Berkhuijsen E.M., Haslam, C. G. T.,
786: Salter, C. J., 1970, Nat, 225, 364
787:
788: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Berkhuijsen et al.}{1971}]
789: {berk71a} Berkhuijsen E.M., Haslam, C. G. T., Salter, C. J., 1971,
790: A\&A, 14, 252
791:
792: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Case \& Bhattacharya}{1998}]
793: {case98} Case, G. L., Bhattacharya, D., 1998, ApJ, 504, 761
794:
795: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Clark \& Caswell}{1976}]
796: {clar76} Clark, D. H., Caswell, J. L., 1976, MNRAS, 174, 267
797:
798: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Haslam et al.}{1964}]
799: {hasl64} Haslam, C. G. T., Large, M. I., Quigley, M. J. S., 1964,
800: MNRAS, 127, 273
801:
802: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Haslam et al.}{1982}]
803: {hasl82} Haslam, C. G. T., Salter, C. J., Stoffel, H., Wilson, W.
804: E., 1982, A\&AS, 47, 1
805:
806: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Large et al.}{1962}]
807: {larg62} Large, M. I., Quigley, M. J. S., Haslam, C. G. T., 1962,
808: MNRAS, 124, 405
809:
810: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Large et al.}{1966}]
811: {larg66} Large, M. I., Quigley, M. J. S., Haslam, C. G. T., 1966,
812: MNRAS, 131, 335
813:
814: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lawson et al.}{1987}]
815: {laws87} Lawson, K. D., Mayer, C. J., Osborne, J. L., Parkinson,
816: M. L., 1987, MNRAS, 225, 307
817:
818: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McKee \& Ostriker}{1977}]
819: {mcke77} McKee, C. F., Ostriker, J. P., 1977, ApJ, 218, 148
820:
821: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Milogradov-Turin}{1972}]
822: {jmt72}Milogradov-Turin, J., 1972, M. Sc. Thesis, Univ. of
823: Manchester
824:
825: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Milogradov-Turin}{1982}]
826: {jmt82}Milogradov-Turin, J., 1982, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of
827: Belgrade
828:
829: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Milogradov-Turin \&
830: Nikoli\'c}{1995a}] {jmt95a} Milogradov-Turin, J., Nikoli\'c, S.,
831: 1995a, BA Belgrade, 151, 7
832:
833: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Milogradov-Turin \&
834: Nikoli\'c}{1995b}] {jmt95b} Milogradov-Turin, J., Nikoli\'c, S.,
835: 1995b, BA Belgrade, 152, 11
836:
837: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Milogradov-Turin \&
838: Smith}{1973}] {jmt73} Milogradov-Turin, J., Smith F. G., 1973,
839: MNRAS, 161, 269
840:
841: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Milogradov-Turin \& Uro\v{s}evi\'c}{1997}]
842: {jmt97} Milogradov-Turin, J., Uro\v{s}evi\'c, D., 1997, BA
843: Belgrade, 155, 41
844:
845: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pacholczyk}{1970}]
846: {pach70} Pacholczyk, A. G. 1970, Radio Astrophysics, Freeman, W.
847: H. and Company, San Francisco
848:
849: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Quigley \& Haslam}{1965}]
850: {quig65} Quigley, M. J. S., Haslam, C. G. T., 1965, Nat, 208,
851: 741
852:
853: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reich \& Reich}{1986}]
854: {reic86} Reich, P., Reich, W., 1986, A\&AS, 63, 205
855:
856: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reich \& Reich}{1988a}]
857: {reic88a} Reich, P., Reich, W., 1988a, A\&AS, 74, 7
858:
859: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reich \& Reich}{1988b}]
860: {reic88b} Reich, P., Reich, W., 1988b, A\&A, 196, 211
861:
862: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reich \& Steffen}{1981}]
863: {reic81} Reich, W., Steffen, P., 1981, A\&A , 93, 27
864:
865: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Salter}{1970}]
866: {salt70} Salter, C. J., 1970, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Manchester
867:
868: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Salter}{1983}]
869: {salt83} Salter, C. J., 1983, BAS of India , 11, 1
870:
871: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Shklovskii \& Sheffer}{1971}]
872: {shkl71} Shklovskii, I. S, Sheffer, E. K., 1971, Nat, 231, 173
873:
874: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Webster}{1974}]
875: {webs74} Webster, A. S., 1974, MNRAS, 166, 355
876:
877:
878: \end{thebibliography}
879:
880: \appendix
881:
882: \begin{figure}
883: \section[]{The Radio Loops and Spurs at 1420, 820 and 408 MH\lowercase{z}}
884: \centering
885: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figA1.eps}
886: \caption{Temperature scales for 1420, 820 and 408 MHz. All are given
887: in K and they are used for all pictures of the radio loops given
888: below.}
889: \label{figA1}
890: \end{figure}
891:
892: %\clearpage
893:
894: \begin{figure}
895: \centering
896: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{figA2.eps}
897: \caption{The area of Loop I at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, showing
898: contours of brightness temperature. This contains the part of the
899: North Polar Spur normal to the Galactic plane: l = [40$^\circ$, 0$^\circ$];
900: b = [18$^\circ$, 78$^\circ$] and its part parallel to the Galactic
901: plane: l = [360$^\circ$, 327$^\circ$]; b = [67$^\circ$, 78$^\circ$]. Two
902: contours are plotted, these representing the temperatures
903: T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$, as given in Table
904: \ref{tab01}.}
905: \label{figA2}
906: \end{figure}
907:
908: \clearpage
909:
910: \begin{figure}
911: \centering
912: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figA3.eps}
913: \caption{The area of Loop II at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, showing
914: contours of brightness temperature. The two contours plotted
915: represent the temperatures T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$, as
916: given in Table \ref{tab01}. White areas in the pictures signify that
917: no data exist there at 1420 and 820 MHz. Spurs belonging to this
918: radio loop have positions: l = [57$^\circ$, 30$^\circ$]; b = [-50$^\circ$,
919: -10$^\circ$] for spur in Aquarius and l = [195$^\circ$, 130$^\circ$]; b =
920: [-70$^\circ$, -2$^\circ$] for spur in Aries.}
921: \label{figA3}
922: \end{figure}
923:
924: %\clearpage
925:
926: \begin{figure}
927: \centering
928: \includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth]{figA4.eps}
929: \caption{The area of Loop III at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, showing
930: contours of brightness temperature. The two contours plotted
931: represent the temperatures T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$, as
932: given in Table \ref{tab01}. The white area in the picture for 820
933: MHz signifies that no data exist there at that frequency. Spurs
934: belonging to this radio loop have positions: l = [180$^\circ$,
935: 135$^\circ$]; b = [2$^\circ$, 50$^\circ$] and l = [135$^\circ$, 110$^\circ$];
936: b = [40$^\circ$, 55$^\circ$] for first spur and l = [110$^\circ$,
937: 70$^\circ$]; b = [6$^\circ$, 50$^\circ$] for second one.}
938: \label{figA4}
939: \end{figure}
940:
941: \clearpage
942:
943: \begin{figure}
944: \centering
945: \includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth]{figA5.eps}
946: \caption{The area of Loop IV at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, showing
947: contours of brightness temperature. The two contours plotted
948: represent the temperatures T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$, as
949: given in Table \ref{tab01}. This radio spur has position: l =
950: [330$^\circ$, 290$^\circ$]; b = [48$^\circ$, 70$^\circ$].}
951: \label{figA5}
952: \end{figure}
953:
954: %\clearpage
955:
956: \begin{figure}
957: \centering
958: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figA6.eps}
959: \caption{The area of Loop V at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, showing
960: contours of brightness temperature. The two contours plotted
961: represent the temperatures T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$, as
962: given in Table \ref{tab01}. Spurs belonging to this radio loop have
963: positions: l = [189$^\circ$, 178$^\circ$]; b = [-25$^\circ$, -13$^\circ$]
964: for the spur in Taurus, l = [147$^\circ$, 133$^\circ$]; b = [-50$^\circ$,
965: -39$^\circ$] for the spur in Pisces and l = [90$^\circ$, 80$^\circ$]; b =
966: [-39$^\circ$, -24$^\circ$] for the spur in Pegasus.}
967: \label{figA6}
968: \end{figure}
969:
970: \clearpage
971:
972: \begin{figure*}
973: \centering
974: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{figA7.eps}
975: \caption{The area of Loop VI at 1420, 820 and 408 MHz, showing
976: contours of brightness temperature. The two contours plotted
977: represent the temperatures T$_\mathrm{min}$ and T$_\mathrm{max}$, as
978: given in Table \ref{tab01}. Spurs belonging to this radio loop have
979: positions: l = [215$^\circ$, 205$^\circ$]; b = [29$^\circ$, 40$^\circ$] for
980: the spur in Leo and l = [207$^\circ$, 196$^\circ$]; b = [10$^\circ$,
981: 32$^\circ$] for the spur in Cancer.}
982: \label{figA7}
983: \end{figure*}
984:
985:
986: \label{lastpage}
987:
988: \end{document}
989: