1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2004 January 9

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}

19: 

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: 

24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

25: 

26: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

27: 

28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

30: %% use the longabstract style option.

31: 

32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

33: 

34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

36: %% the \begin{document} command.

37: %%

38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

41: %% for information.

42: 

43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

45: 

46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

47: 

48: \slugcomment{To appear in MNRAS Main Journal.}

49: 

50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

56: 

57: \shorttitle{On the common origin of the AB Dor moving group and

58: the Pleiades cluster} \shortauthors{V. Ortega et al.}

59: 

60: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

62: 

63: \begin{document}

64: 

65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

67: %% you desire.

68: 

69: \title{On the common origin of the AB Dor moving group and the Pleiades cluster}

70: 

71: 

72: \author{V. G. Ortega\altaffilmark{1}, E. Jilinski \altaffilmark{1, 2}, R. de la Reza\altaffilmark{1} and B. Bazzanella\altaffilmark{1}}

73: 

74: \altaffiltext{1}{Observat\'orio Nacional, Rua General Jos\'e

75: Cristino 77, S\~{a}o Cristov\~{a}o, 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro,

76: Brazil.}

77: 

78: \altaffiltext{2}{Pulkovo Observatory, Russian Academy of Science,

79: 65, Pulkovo, 196140 St. Petersburg, Russia.}

80: 

81: \email{vladimir@on.br, jilinski@on.br, delareza@on.br,

82: bruno@on.br}

83: 

84: \begin{abstract}

85: AB Dor is the nearest identified moving group. As with other such

86: groups, the age is important for understanding of several key

87: questions. It is important, for example, in establishing the

88: origin of the group and also in comparative studies of the

89: properties of planetary systems, eventually surrounding some of

90: the AB Dor group members, with those existing in other groups. For

91: AB Dor two rather different estimates for its age have been

92: proposed: a first one, of the order of 50 Myr, by Zuckerman and

93: coworkers from a comparison with Tucana / Horologium moving group

94: and a second one of about 100$-$125 Myr by Luhman and coworkers

95: from color-magnitude diagrams (CMD). Using this last value and the

96: closeness in velocity space of AB Dor and the Pleiades galactic

97: cluster, Luhman and coworkers suggested coevality for these

98: systems. Because strictly speaking such a closeness does not still

99: guarantee coevality, here we address this problem by computing and

100: comparing the full 3D orbits of AB Dor, Pleiades, $\alpha$ Persei

101: and IC 2602. The latter two open clusters have estimated ages of

102: about $85-90$ Myr and 50 Myr. The resulting age 119 $\pm$ 20 Myr

103: is consistent with AB Dor and Pleiades being coeval. Our solution

104: and the scenario of open cluster formation proposed by Kroupa and

105: collaborators suggest that the AB Dor moving group may be

106: identified with the expanding subpopulation (Group I) present in

107: this scenario. We also discuss other related aspects as iron and

108: lithium abundances, eventual stellar mass segregation during the

109: formation of the systems and possible fraction of debris discs in

110: AB Dor group.

111: \end{abstract}

112: 

113: \keywords{Galaxy: solar neighborhood, structure, kinematics and

114: dynamics, open clusters and associations: individual: Pleiades, AB

115: Doradus.}

116: 

117: \section{Introduction}

118: 

119: In a series of publications Eggen introduced and discussed the

120: concept of superclusters defined as stellar aggregates in the

121: solar neighborhood which are characterized by parallel space

122: motions of their members. One of these superclusters is the Local

123: Association (Eggen 1975, 1983 a,b) located within a radius of a

124: few hundred parsecs around the Sun and often referred to as the

125: Pleiades supercluster because of the similarity of the space

126: motions of its members and the Pleiades open cluster. Apart from

127: Pleiades, other open star clusters as $\alpha$ Persei, IC 2602,

128: $\delta$ Lyrae, NGC 1039, NGC 2516 and also the Scorpio-Centaurus

129: (Sco-Cen) OB association would be contained in the Local

130: Association.

131: 

132: With recent identifications of relatively small nearby groups or

133: associations of post T-Tauri stars with ages from 8 Myr to 50 Myr

134: (Zuckerman and Song 2004b, Torres et al. 2006), located within

135: 100$-$150 pc of the Sun and with previous knowledge of the Sco-Cen

136: complex (de Zeeuw et al. 1999, Mamajek et al. 2002), it can be

137: said that a new stage of investigation of the structure of the

138: Local Association has begun. We are now even in a position to

139: suggest plausible formation scenarios for some of those groups.

140: For instance, the young kinematic groups TW Hya (Torres et al.

141: 2003, Zuckerman \& Song 2004b) with an age of 8.3 Myr (de la Reza

142: et al. 2006), $\beta$ Pictoris (Zuckerman et al. 2001, Torres et

143: al. 2006) with an age of 11.3 Myr (Ortega et al. 2002, 2004) and

144: $\eta$ and $\epsilon$ Chamaeleontis groups (Mamajek et al. 2000,

145: Feigelson et al. 2003) with an age of 6.7 Myr (Jilinski et al.

146: 2005) may be the result of a sequence of bursts of low mass star

147: formation related to the older Sco-Cen subgroups with an age of

148: about 18 Myr (Ortega et al. 2005).

149: 

150: In addition to these, two other groups have been identified within

151: 50 pc of the Sun: the Tucana / Horologium (Zuckerman et al. 2000,

152: Torres et al. 2000) and AB Dor (Zuckerman et al. 2004a) moving

153: groups. For the AB Dor group, comoving with the star AB Doradus

154: only 15 pc from the Sun, Zuckerman et al. (2004a) derived an age

155: of about 50 Myr on the basis of a comparison with the Tucana /

156: Horologium group (Zuckerman and Webb 2000, Torres et al. 2000,

157: Zuckerman and Song 2004b) and from the location of AB Dor M

158: spectral type stars in the CMD. However, Luhman et al. (2005)

159: analyzing the discrepancy between evolution models for very low

160: mass stars and direct mass measurements of the brown dwarf C

161: component of the triple AB Doradus system (Close et el. 2005,

162: Nielsen et al. 2005, Marois et al. 2005), have proposed that the

163: AB Dor moving group may have larger age in the 100$-$125 Myr

164: range. Moreover, by noticing that the mean space motion of AB Dor

165: group is similar to the Pleiades galactic cluster's mean motion,

166: Luhman et al. (2005) suggested that the former is probably coeval

167: with the latter. In this context, it is interesting that Innis et

168: al. (1986) had proposed that the rapid rotators AB Doradus and PZ

169: Tel may be part of the group of fast rotating K stars of the

170: Pleiades cluster, what would characterize both of them as young

171: systems. As for PZ Tel, we now know that this star is a member of

172: the $\beta$ Pictoris moving group (Zuckerman et al. 2001, Torres

173: et al. 2006) for which we have a fairly accurate age estimate. In

174: contrast, for AB Dor we have two conflicting age values.

175: 

176: To resolve this discrepancy and derive an age estimate for the AB

177: Dor group here we tackle the problem by calculating the Galactic

178: orbits of both the Pleiades cluster and the AB Dor group. We also

179: compare the orbits of AB Dor with those of the $\alpha$

180: \textbf{Persei} and IC 2602 clusters, which are considered to be

181: younger than Pleiades (Makarov 2006, Randich 2001b, Randich et al.

182: 2001a) with estimated ages of $\sim$ 50 Myr comparable to the age

183: of AB Dor moving group as given by Zuckerman et al. (2004a). For

184: the $\alpha$ Persei cluster Stauffer et al. (1999) and Barrado y

185: Navascu\'es et al. (2004)) have estimated ages of 90 $\pm$ 10 Myr

186: and 85 $\pm$ 20 Myr, respectively, on the basis of lithium

187: depletion.

188: 

189: \section{The orbits }

190: 

191: As mentioned above, one of the main reasons given by Luhman et al.

192: (2005) for coevality of AB Dor with the Pleiades cluster was the

193: similar space motions of these groups. Nevertheless, this

194: similarity is not a sufficient condition for coevality. The full

195: 3D path for each system has to be calculated.

196: 

197: As in previous work (e.g. Ortega et al. 2002), our method consists

198: in integrating back in time the 3D orbits of the stars and

199: following the evolution to check for the existence of a first

200: minimum of the configuration. When such a minimum exists the

201: orbits are confined in a certain region which is considered their

202: place of birth. Equivalently, when a comparison of the orbits of

203: the centers of two stellar systems is made, the minimum distance

204: gives the radius of the region occupied by those systems. The

205: dynamical age is then determined by the time elapsed from orbital

206: convergence. The resulting age is called $\it dynamical$ because

207: the orbits are calculated under a (modelled) Galactic potential.

208: 

209: \begin{figure}

210: \epsscale{0.7} \plotone{fig1.EPS} \caption{Galactic orbits of

211: Pleiades cluster and AB Dor moving group in projection on the XY

212: plane. The size of the grey circle corresponds to the size of the

213: birth region (R$=$43 pc). Each two point interval corresponds to

214: 10 Myr time interval. \label{fig1}}

215: \end{figure}

216: 

217: \begin{figure}

218: \epsscale{0.7} \plotone{fig2.EPS} \caption{The same as in Fig 1 in

219: projection on the YZ Plane. \label{fig2}}

220: \end{figure}

221: 

222: \begin{figure}

223: \epsscale{0.7} \plotone{fig4.EPS} \caption{Galactic orbits of AB

224: Dor moving group and $\alpha$ Persei up to $-$ 100 Myr and IC 2602

225: clusters up to $-$50 Myr in projection on the XY plane. Each two

226: point interval corresponds to 10 Myr time interval \label{fig3}}

227: \end{figure}

228: 

229: \begin{figure}

230: \epsscale{0.7} \plotone{fig5.EPS} \caption{The same as in Fig 4 in

231: projection on the YZ Plane. \label{fig4}}

232: \end{figure}

233: 

234: \begin{figure}

235: \epsscale{0.7} \plotone{fig3.EPS} \caption{The evolution of the

236: distance between the centers of  Pleiades and the AB Dor moving

237: group. \label{fig5}}

238: \end{figure}

239: 

240: In the case of clusters it is advisable to work with mean values

241: of the distances and velocities instead of using the whole sample

242: of members. This greatly minimizes the errors in the input. In

243: this work we take the input values for the Pleiades cluster from

244: Luhman et al. (2005). For the AB Dor group we derive such values

245: using the Hipparcos data for the members proposed by Zuckerman et

246: al. (2004a) and more recent published radial velocities. Finally,

247: the input data for $\alpha$ Persei and IC 2602 were taken from

248: Robichon et al. (1999).

249: 

250: \section{Dynamical evolution results}

251: 

252: \begin{table}

253: \centering

254: %% \begin{minipage}{100mm}

255:   \caption{Relative velocity between the centers of the

256: Pleiades cluster and the AB Dor moving group for several ages

257: values near the birth epoch.}

258:   \begin{tabular}{@{}cc@{}}

259:     Age   & V [pc Myr $^{-1}$] \\[5pt]

260:    $-118$   &  $ +0.29 $\\

261:    $-119$   &  $ +0.06 $\\

262:    $-120$   &  $ -0.18 $\\

263:    $-121$   &  $ -0.38 $\\

264: \end{tabular}

265: %%\end{minipage}

266: \end{table}

267: 

268: The resulting orbits (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4) are drawn in the LSR frame

269: of reference with cartesian axes X, Y, Z positive in the

270: directions of the Galactic center, the Galactic rotation and the

271: north Galactic pole respectively. The evolution of AB Dor with the

272: $\alpha$ Persei and IC 2602 clusters does not attain any minimum.

273: As seen from Figures 3 and 4 the paths of these systems and that

274: of AB Dor group are quite different in both projection planes.

275: Conversely, the calculation for the AB Dor and Pleiades cluster

276: shows (Figs. 1, 2) that a minimum was reached at the age of $-$119

277: $\pm$ 20 Myr. In Fig. 5 we show the distance between the centers

278: of Pleiades and AB Dor as a function of time. In Table 1 we quote

279: some values of the relative velocity between the centers of these

280: systems. As can be seen from this table, the relative velocity is

281: negligible near the estimated epoch (119 Myrs) of Pleiades

282: formation, showing that here we do not have a simple crossing of

283: orbits. The minimum separation of AB Dor and the Pleiades cluster

284: determines a region of 43 $\pm$ 11 pc of radius. As in previous

285: work (Jilinski et al. 2005) the errors in the age and also in the

286: radius were estimated through Monte Carlo tests. Tests with 1000

287: realizations were performed. Because the dynamical age was

288: computed differentially here, possible systematic errors caused by

289: uncertainties in the potential will mutually compensate each

290: other. Hence the resulting errors will be determined by the

291: uncertainties in the initial data.

292: 

293: The region at minimum is quite large. The size of the region of

294: maximum orbits approximation is probably connected with an

295: expansion of AB Dor group during the formation process. The loss

296: of rotational support of the system resulting from the expansion

297: is reflected in an increased U velocity, that is, in the velocity

298: component in the direction of the Galactic center. However, the

299: orbits of both groups are readily spread out along the positive Y

300: direction by the action of the Galactic rotation. The groups are

301: moving towards the Galactic plane along the Z direction .

302: 

303: A scenario for the formation of the Pleiades star cluster

304: involving the generation of an expanding population has been

305: inferred by Kroupa et al. (2001) from their N-body calculations.

306: If this applies also to our case we can propose that the AB Dor

307: moving group might be the expanding population (group I), or at

308: least part thereof, present in that scenario. Our results give a

309: range (100$-$140 Myr) for the age, somewhat different from that

310: found in Luhman et al. (2005) but not conflicting with their

311: conclusions concerning the age of the AB Dor group.

312: 

313: %\clearpage

314: 

315: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}

316: 

317: \begin{table}

318:  \centering

319:  \begin{minipage}{100mm}

320:   \caption{Individual metallicity determinations for AB Dor stars.}

321:   \begin{tabular}{@{}lrcl@{}}

322:    %     &            & %\multicolumn{4}{c}{Flux density (Jy)%

323:   %\footnote{1. Valenti et al. 2005;}}\\

324:  Star        & [Fe/H]&  T$^{0}$K   & Ref  \\[5pt]

325:  HIP 6276    &  0.06 & 5421 &  Valenti et al. 2005 \\

326:  CD $-$33 2353&  0.00 & 4550 &  Castilho et al.

327: 2005 \\

328:  HIP 18859   & -0.11 &  F5V &  Cayrel de Strobel et al. 2001 \\

329:  HIP 18859   &  0.06 &  F5V &  Cayrel de Strobel et al. 2001 \\

330:  HIP 18859   & -0.03 &      &  Taylor 2003 \\

331:  HIP 18859   &  0.06 & 6246 &  Shi et al. 2004 \\

332:  HIP 18859   & -0.11 & 6162 &  Soubiran et al. 2005 \\

333:  HIP 18859   & -0.07 & 6308 &  Gray et al. 2003 \\

334:  CD $-$38 2324 & -0.20 & 5530 &  Cayrel de Strobel et al. 2001 \\

335:  CD $-$38 2324 &  0.00 & 4800 &  Castilho et al. 2005\\

336:  HIP 25647   &  0.18 & 5143 &  Cayrel de Strobel et al. 1997 \\

337:  HIP 26401   &  0.00 & 5400 &  Castilho et al.

338: 2005 \\

339:  HIP 26373   & -0.02 & 5040 &  Soderblom et al. 1998 \\

340:  HIP 26373   &  0.00 & 4850 &  Castilho et al. 2005 \\

341: 

342:  HIP 30314   & -0.15 & 5600 &  Castilho et al.

343: 2005\\

344:  HIP 37855   & -0.10 & 5800 &  Castilho et al.

345: 2005 \\

346:  HIP 63742   & -0.06 & 5287 &  Gaidos and Gonzales 2002 \\

347:  HIP 82688   &  0.05 & 5967 &  Valenti et al. 2005 \\

348:  HIP 107684  &  0.00 & 5500 &  Castilho et al.

349: 2005 \\

350:  HIP 114530  &  0.00 & 5400 &  Castilho et al.

351: 2005 \\

352:  HIP 116910  &  0.00 & 5400 &  Castilho et al.

353: 2005 \\

354:  HIP 118008  & -0.05 & 4850 &  Castilho et al.

355: 2005 \\

356: 

357: \end{tabular}

358: \end{minipage}

359: \end{table}

360: 

361: In this work we have considered the question of the age of the AB

362: Dor moving group from the dynamical point of view. As mentioned in

363: the introduction, two quite different estimates for the age of

364: this group have been given: $\sim$ 50 Myr (Zuckerman et al.

365: 2004a), and $\sim$ 125 Myr (Luhman et al. 2005), which is also the

366: age of the Pleiades open cluster. Here we have approached this

367: problem by comparing the 3D orbits of the centers of AB Dor, and

368: of the open clusters Pleiades, $\alpha$ Persei and IC 2602. The

369: results of this analysis show that the AB Dor moving group and the

370: Pleiades cluster are coeval having formed some 119 $\pm$ 20 Myr

371: ago. As for Pleiades, the dynamical age is compatible with the

372: evolutionary age determinations for this system. For instance, the

373: upper main sequence turnoff point gives an age of 100 Myr (e.g.

374: Mermilliod 1981, Meynet et al. 1993) while somewhat more recent

375: determinations using the lithium boundary method yield an age of

376: 125 Myr (Stauffer et al. 1998, 1999, Barrado y Navascu\'es et al.

377: 1999, 2004). As for the AB Dor group, our results are consistent

378: with Luhman et al. (2005) who concluded that an age greater than

379: 50 Myr, of the order of the Pleiades age, would help eliminate the

380: discrepancy between models and measurements of the mass of AB

381: Doradus C star. It should be remarked, however, that according to

382: Nielsen et al. (2005) a greater age will be only part of the

383: solution because of problems related with the effective

384: temperature of that brown dwarf.

385: 

386: The size of the birth region of Pleiades and AB Dor moving group

387:  yielded by our dynamical solution could, in principle, be

388:  explained within the  framework  of the open cluster formation scenario put

389:  forward by Kroupa et al. (2001). In this scenario a bound and an

390:  unbound system are born together. We suggest that the unbound system expanding

391:  at formation could be identified with the AB Dor group.

392:  This overall picture is also in agreement with conclusions of Luhman et al. (2005) who

393:  suggested that the AB Dor group could be a remnant of an OB association

394:  related to the formation of the Pleiades cluster.

395: 

396: Apart from these dynamical characteristics, the Pleiades and AB

397: Dor group also share some other features that can provide

398: independent supporting evidence of their common origin. For

399: example, this appears to be the case with the iron abundance. In

400: fact, 45 spectroscopic high resolution determinations of the

401: metallicity (Cayrel de Strobel et al. 2001) give a mean value of

402: 0.00 $\pm$ 0.01 for the Pleiades, whereas for AB Dor a metallicity

403: of -0.02 $\pm$ 0.02 was obtained as an average from high

404: resolution spectroscopic measurements in a sample of 15 member

405: stars, including AB Doradus itself (see Table 2). Comparisons of

406: lithium abundance are also interesting and may provide additional

407: support for Pleiades and AB Dor coevality. In this context, da

408: Silva et al. (2006) have shown that lithium abundances data

409: indicate a depletion of this element between 11 Myr and the main

410: sequence. This was done by considering the members of groups

411: $\beta$ Pictoris, Tucana / Horologium, AB Dor and of the Pleiades

412: cluster. For all stellar temperatures the lithium abundance of

413: $\beta$ Pictoris members is larger if compared with those of

414: Tucana / Horologium, whereas stars of AB Dor and Pleiades have

415: similar lithium distributions.

416: 

417:  Some possible consequences of the suggested common origin of the

418:  AB Dor group and the Pleiades cluster deserve special attention.

419:  Two particulary interesting ones are the stellar mass distribution and the

420:  fractional distribution of candidates of debris discs in both

421:  stellar systems. Concerning the mass distribution, it is interesting to

422:  note the apparent absence of A type stars with masses about 2.5

423:  M$_{\sun}$ (and also B type stars) in the proposed

424:  list of members of the AB Dor group by Zuckerman et al. (2004a).

425:  This in fact, is notorious if we consider that younger

426:  associations such as TW Hya and $\beta$ Pictoris do contain A

427:  type stars. If this is not an observational selection effect, we

428:  can speculate that the absence of A Type stars in the AB Dor group could be

429:  related to the fact that they are present in Pleiades. An efficient mass

430:  segregation mechanism should then have been acting during the

431:  initial separation phase of these groups.

432: 

433:  As for debris discs, a recent 24-micron Spitzer survey (emission

434:  on these wavelengths is produced in the planetary internal zone between 1 and 20 AU

435:  from the central star) in the Pleiades by Gorlova et al. (2006)

436:  has shown that 25\% of B-A type members and 10\% of F$-$F3 type stars

437:  are debris disk candidates due to their excess IR emission at an age

438:  around 100 Myr. It would then be interesting to conduct a similar survey at 24

439:  micron in the AB Dor group and compare its fraction of

440:  debris disc candidates with that in Pleiades.

441: 

442: 

443: \acknowledgments

444: 

445: EJ thanks MCT of Brazil for the financial support under the

446: contract 384222/2006$-$4.

447: 

448: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

449: 

450: \bibitem{b1} Barrado y Navascu\'es, David, Stauffer, John R., Jayawardhana,

451: Ray, 2004, ApJ, 614, 386

452: \bibitem{b2} Barrado y Navascu\'es, David, Stauffer, John R., Patten, Brian

453: M., 1999, ApJ, 522, L53

454: \bibitem{b3} Castilho, Bruno V., Torres, C. A. O., Quast, G., Sartori, M.

455: J., da Silva, L., de La Reza, R., 2005, From Lithium to Uranium:

456: Elemental Tracers of Early Cosmic Evolution, IAU Symposium

457: Proceedings of the international Astronomical Union 228, Held in

458: Paris, France, May 23-27, 2005. edited by Hill, V.; François, P.,

459: Primas, F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005., pp. 83

460: \bibitem{b4} Close, Laird M., Lenzen, Rainer, Guirado, Jose C., Nielsen, Eric

461: L., Mamajek, Eric E., Brandner, Wolfgang, Hartung, Markus, Lidman,

462: Chris, Biller, Beth, 2005, Nature, Volume 433, Issue 7023, pp. 286

463: \bibitem{b5} Cayrel de Strobel, G., Soubiran, C., Ralite, N., 2001, A\&A, 373, 159

464: \bibitem{b6} Cayrel de Strobel, G., Soubiran, C., Friel, E. D., Ralite, N., Francois,

465: P., 1997, A\&AS, 124, 299

466: \bibitem{b7} da Silva, L., de La Reza, R., Torres, C. A., Quast, G., Melo, C. H.,

467: Convection in Astrophysics, IAU Symposium 239, held 21-25 August,

468: 2006 in Prague, Czech Republic, p. 54

469: \bibitem{b8} de la Reza, R., Jilinski, E., Ortega, V. G., 2006, AJ, 131, 2609

470: \bibitem{b9} de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A.

471: G. A., Blaauw, A., 1999, AJ, 117, 354

472: \bibitem{b10} Eggen, O. J., 1983b, MNRAS, 204, 391

473: \bibitem{b11} Eggen, O. J., 1983a, MNRAS, 204, 377

474: \bibitem{b12} Eggen, O. J., 1975, PASP, 87, 37

475: \bibitem{b13} Jilinski, E., Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., 2005, ApJ, 619, 945

476: \bibitem{b14} Feigelson, Eric D., Lawson, Warrick A., Garmire, Gordon

477: P., 2003, ApJ, 599., 1207

478: \bibitem{b15} Gaidos E. J., Gonzalez G., 2002, New Astronomy, 7, 211

479: \bibitem{b16} Gorlova, N., Rieke, G. H., Muzerolle, J., Stauffer, J.

480: R., Siegler, N., Young, E, T., Stansberry, J. H., astro-ph/0606039

481: \bibitem{b17} Gray, R. O., Corbally, C.

482: J., Garrison, R. F., McFadden, M. T., Robinson, P. E., 2003, AJ,

483: 126, 2048

484: \bibitem{b18} Innis, J. L., Thompson, K., Coates, D. W., 1986, MNRAS, 223, 183

485: \bibitem{b19} Kroupa, Pavel; Aarseth, Sverre; Hurley, Jarrod, 2001, MNRAS, 321, 699

486: \bibitem{b20} Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, John R., Mamajek, E. E., 2005, ApJ, 628, L69

487: \bibitem{b21} Makarov, Valeri V., 2006, AJ, 131, 2967

488: \bibitem{b22} Mamajek, Eric E., Meyer, Michael R., Liebert, James, 2002, AJ, 124, 1670

489: \bibitem{b23} Mamajek, Eric E., Lawson, Warrick A., Feigelson, Eric

490: D., 2000, ApJ, 544, 356

491: \bibitem{b24} Mermilliod, J. C., 1981, A\&A, 97, 235

492: \bibitem{b25} Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Song, I., Barman, T., astro-ph/0502382

493: \bibitem{b26} Meynet, G., Mermilliod, J.-C., Maeder, A., 1993, A\&AS, 98, 477

494: \bibitem{b27} Nielsen, E. L., Close, L. M., Guirado, J. C., Biller, B. A., Lenzen,

495: R., Brandner, W., Hartung, M., Lidman, C., 2005, AN, 326, 1033

496: \bibitem{b28} Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., Jilinski, E., 2006,

497: RMxAC (Serie de Conferencias) Vol. 26, 91

498: \bibitem{b29} Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., Jilinski, E., Bazzanella,

499: B., 2004, ApJ, 609, 243

500: \bibitem{b30} Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., Jilinski, E., Bazzanella,

501: B., 2002, ApJ, 575, L75

502: \bibitem{b32} Robichon, N.; Arenou, F.; Mermilliod, J.-C., Turon,

503: C., 1999, A\&A, 345, 471

504: \bibitem{b33} Randich, S., 2001b, A\&A, 377, 512

505: \bibitem{b34} Randich, S., Pallavicini, R., Meola, G., Stauffer, J.

506: R., Balachandran, S. C., 2001a, A\&A, 372, 862

507: \bibitem{b35} Shi, J. R., Gehren, T., Zhao, G., 2004, A\&A, 423, 683

508: \bibitem{b36} Soderblom, David R., King, Jeremy R., Henry, Todd J.,

509: 1998, AJ, 116, 396

510: \bibitem{b37} Soubiran, C., Girard, P., 2005, A\&A, 438, 139

511: \bibitem{b38} Stauffer, J. R., Barrado y Navascués, D., Bouvier,

512: J., Morrison, H. L., Harding, P., Luhman, K. L., Stanke, T.,

513: McCaughrean, M., Terndrup, D. M., Allen, L., Assouad, P., 1999,

514: ApJ, 527, 219

515: \bibitem{b39} Stauffer, John R., Schultz, Greg, Kirkpatrick, J.

516: Davy, 1998, ApJ, 499, L199

517: \bibitem{b40} Taylor, B., J., 2003, A\&A, 398, 731

518: \bibitem{b41} Torres, C.,A., 0., Quast, G., R., da Silva, L., de la Reza,

519: R., Melo C., H., F., Sterzik M., 2006, A\&A preprint doi

520: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065602

521: \bibitem{b42} Torres, Carlos A. O., da Silva, Licio, Quast, Germano R.,

522: de la Reza, Ramiro, Jilinski, Evgueni, 2000, AJ, 120, 1410

523: \bibitem{b43} Torres, Guillermo, Guenther, Eike W., Marschall, Laurence A., Neuhäuser,

524: Ralph, Latham, David W., Stefanik, Robert P., 2003, AJ, 125, 825

525: \bibitem{b44} Valenti, J. A., Fischer, D. A., 2005, ApJS, 159, 141

526: \bibitem{b45} Zuckerman, B., Song, Inseok, 2004b, ARA\&A, 42, 685

527: \bibitem{b46} Zuckerman, B., Song, Inseok, Bessell, M. S., 2004a, ApJ, 613, L65

528: \bibitem{b47} Zuckerman, B., Song, Inseok, Webb, R. A., 2001, ApJ, 559, 388

529: \bibitem{b48} Zuckerman, B., Webb, R. A., 2000, ApJ, 535, 959

530: 

531: \end{thebibliography}

532: 

533: \end{document}

534: