1: % Version as of Aug 25, revised by (WMY)
2: % revised version on 29 Jan (WMY)
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[preprint]{/home/wmy/paper/journal/macro/aastex/aastex}
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
7: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
8: %\usepackage{/home/wmy/paper/journal/macro/aastex/emulateapj5}
9: %\usepackage[]{natbib}
10: %%\usepackage{apjfonts}
11: %\usepackage{graphics}
12: %\usepackage{amssymb}
13: %\usepackage{amsmath}
14:
15: %\slugcomment{} \shorttitle{2MASX J0324+3410}
16:
17: \shortauthors{Zhou et al.}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{A narrow line Seyfert\,1--blazar composite nucleus in 2MASX
22: J0324+3410}
23:
24: \author{Hongyan Zhou\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, Tinggui Wang\altaffilmark{1,2},
25: Weimin Yuan\altaffilmark{4},
26: Hongguang Shan\altaffilmark{4}, Stefanie Komossa\altaffilmark{5},
27: Honglin Lu\altaffilmark{1,2}, Yi Liu\altaffilmark{6},
28: Dawei Xu\altaffilmark{7}, J. M. Bai\altaffilmark{4},
29: D.R. Jiang\altaffilmark{6}
30: }
31:
32: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Astrophysics, University of Science
33: and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P.R.China}
34:
35: \altaffiltext{2}{Joint Institute of Galaxies and Cosmology, SHAO
36: and USTC}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Florida,
39: Gainesville, FL 32611i, USA}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{4}{National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan
42: Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.O.
43: BOX 110, P.R.China}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{5}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r extraterrestrische
46: Physik, Postfach 1312, 85741 Garching, Germany}
47:
48: \altaffiltext{6}{Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of
49: Sciences, Nandan Road, Shanghai, China}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{7}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese
52: Academy of Sciences, A20 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing
53: 100012, China}
54:
55: \email{twang@ustc.edu.cn}
56:
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: We report the identification of 2MASX J032441.19+341045.9
60: (hereafter 2MASX J0324+3410) with an appealing object
61: which shows the dual properties of both a narrow line
62: Seyfert 1 galaxy (NLS1) and a blazar.
63: Its optical spectrum, which has
64: a $H\beta$ line width about 1600~km~s$^{-1}$ (FWHM),
65: an [OIII] to $H\beta$ line ratio
66: $\backsimeq 0.12$,
67: and strong FeII emission,
68: clearly fulfills the conventional definition of NLS1s.
69: On the other hand, 2MASX J0324+3410 also exhibits some
70: behavior which is characteristic of blazars, including
71: a flat radio spectrum above 1 GHz,
72: a compact core plus a one-sided jet structure on mas-scale
73: at 8.4 GHz,
74: highly variable fluxes in the radio, optical, and X-ray bands,
75: and a possible detection of TeV $\gamma$-ray emission.
76: On its optical image, obtained with the HST WFPC2,
77: the active nucleus is displaced from the center of the host galaxy,
78: which exhibits an apparent one-armed spiral structure extended to
79: 16 kpc.
80: The remarkable hybrid behavior of this object presents a challenge to
81: current models of NLS1 galaxies and $\gamma$-ray blazars.
82:
83: \end{abstract}
84:
85: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: Seyfert -- galaxies:
86: peculiar -- galaxies: jets -- galaxies: individual (2MASX
87: J0324+3410)}
88:
89: \section{Introduction}
90:
91: Since their identification as a special subgroup of broad line
92: active galactic nuclei (AGNs),
93: narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLS1s, Osterbrock \& Pogge
94: 1985) have drawn substantial attention in the AGN
95: community over the last twenty years.
96: The conventional definition of NLS1s consists of
97: two criteria:
98: 1) a narrow width of the broad Balmer emission line
99: ($FWHM(H\beta)<2\,000$~km~s$^{-1}$);
100: and 2) weak forbidden lines ($[OIII]\lambda5007/H\beta<3$).
101: Subsequent studies revealed their
102: other unusual properties, such as
103: 1) strong FeII multiplet emission (e.g.,
104: Boroson \& Green 1992; Grupe et al. 1999; Veron et al. 2001;
105: Zhou et al. 2006); 2) steep soft X-ray spectra (Wang et
106: al. 1996; Boller et al. 1996; Grupe et al. 1998); 3) rapid and large amplitudes of X-ray
107: variability (e.g., Leighly 1999; Komossa et al. 2000);
108: and 4) commonly blue shifted UV line profiles (e.g.,
109: Leighly \& Moore 2004).
110: These unusual properties are in fact an
111: extension to the extremity of a set of correlations between
112: H$\beta$ line width and the other observables.
113: These correlations form the so-called eigenvector 1 (E1, Boroson \&
114: Green 1992; Sulentic et al. 2000). E1 is considered as the manifestation
115: of the variation of one or a certain combination of several fundamental
116: parameters of AGNs, such as the black hole mass and/or accretion rate.
117:
118: NLS1s are usually radio-quiet (RQ) with radio loudness $R<10$
119: (defined as radio to B-band optical flux ratio, $R\equiv f_{5GHz}/f_{B}$).
120: The last decade has witnessed the identification of about two dozen
121: radio-loud (RL) NLS1s
122: (Grupe et al. 2000; Zhou \& Wang 2002; Zhou et al. 2003; Zhou et al. 2005;
123: Komossa et al. 2006a,b; Zhou et al. 2006).
124: Given the intriguing fact that RL AGNs and ``normal'' NLS1s
125: occupy the opposite extremes of
126: the E1 parameter space (Boroson 2002), the study of RL NLS1s
127: may provide important clues to understanding
128: the physical drivers of E1.
129:
130: First proposed by Spiegel in 1978 to refer to
131: rapidly variable AGNs,
132: blazars, including BL Lac objects and flat spectrum radio quasars
133: (FSRQ), are another small distinct subset of AGNs.
134: An operational definition is: flat radio spectrum
135: above 1 GHz, fast variability, high and variable polarization,
136: superluminal motion, and high brightness temperature (Urry \& Padova 1995).
137: Blazars are believed to be radio loud AGN viewed
138: (almost) along the direction of their radio jets;
139: so that non-thermal jet emission is relativistically boosted.
140: In our recent work,
141: we found that the two radio loudest NLS1s, SDSS
142: J094857.3+002225 (Zhou et al.\ 2003) and 0846+51W1 (Zhou et al.\
143: 2005), both show blazar-like behavior.
144: These results suggest that relativistic beaming
145: may play an important role in very radio loud (VRL) NLS1s.
146:
147: In this letter, we report the discovery of
148: an appealing NLS1--blazar composite object,
149: J032441.19+341045.9 (hereafter 2MASX J0324+3410),
150: an extreme and the best example so far
151: in the line of the NLS1-blazar connection.
152: This object was first observed spectroscopically
153: by Remillard et al. (1993) as an
154: optical counterpart of an X-ray source detected in the HEAO-1
155: X-ray survey, and was classified as a Seyfert 1 galaxy.
156: It was subsequently observed by March$\tilde{\rm a}$
157: et al. (1996) but was (mis-)classified
158: as a narrow line radio galaxy (NLRG).
159: Here we present our new spectroscopic observation and
160: classification, along with its broad band property;
161: we defer to a future paper for
162: detailed analyses of its full data set from
163: both archives and our on-going monitoring observations.
164: Throughout this paper, we assume a
165: cosmology with $H_{0}$= 70 km\, s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$,
166: $\Omega_{M}=0.3$, and $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$.
167:
168: \section{Observations, data analysis, and broad band properties}
169:
170: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy and NLS1 classification}
171:
172: We took spectra of 2MASX J0324+3410 with the
173: OMR spectrograph attached to the Cassegrain focus of
174: the 2.16m telescope at Xinglong Station of
175: National Astronomical Observatory of China (NAOC)
176: on Nov 25, 2005. A 1200 line mm$^{-1}$
177: grating (50 \AA~ mm$^{-1}$ dispersion) and a Tek
178: $1300\times1024$ CCD were used to cover a wavelength range of 1200 \AA~
179: centered at 5100\,\AA.
180: Four exposures of 60 minutes each
181: were taken. KPNO standard stars were observed for
182: absolute flux calibration.
183: A slit width of $2\farcs 5$ was chosen to match the seeing disk.
184: The spectral resolution as measured from
185: the night-sky lines was 2.75\AA~ at FWHM. The CCD reduction,
186: including bias subtraction, flat-field correction, and cosmic-ray
187: removal were accomplished following the standard procedures using IRAF.
188: The spectra were extracted and combined into a 1-D spectrum
189: with the Galactic extinction $E(B-V)=0^{m}.213$ corrected.
190: %(Schlegel et al. 1998).
191:
192: We fit the spectrum with the following model components:
193: 1) a power law continuum;
194: 2) two Gaussians for the [OIII]$\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007 doublet;
195: 3) two Lorentzians for H$\beta$ and H$\gamma$, respectively; and
196: 4) the optical FeII multiplets of V$\acute{e}$ron-Cetty et al. (2004).
197: The redshifts and profiles of the [OIII] doublet are taken to be the same,
198: and their flux ratio is fixed to the theoretical value.
199: We also assume that the broad component of H$\beta$, H$\gamma$, and
200: the FeII multiplets have the same redshifts and line
201: profiles; and the same assumption is for the narrow component of
202: these lines\footnote{V$\acute{e}$ron-Cetty's FeII model includes forbidden
203: FeII lines.}.
204: The result is displayed in Figure \ref{f1}.
205: We also tried to fit
206: the broad component of the Balmer lines with Gaussian,
207: and found that they
208: cannot be fitted with a single
209: Gaussian but two Gaussians are needed.
210: This latter model yields somewhat broader FWHM
211: but similar line strength
212: compared to the former Lorentzian model
213: for both the FeII and Balmer lines.
214: %Using a Gaussian profile instead of Lorentzian
215: %for the broad H$\beta$ component leads to a similar line width and strength
216: %due to the weakness of the narrow component.
217:
218: The redshift of 2MASX J0324+3410 as determined from [OIII] is
219: $z=0.0629\pm0.0001$, consistent with that of the Balmer lines within
220: the measurement uncertainties. The Balmer line width,
221: FWHM = 1\,520~km~s$^{-1}$ for a Lorentzian model and 1\,650~km~s$^{-1}$
222: for a double Gaussian model (after correction for instrumental broadening),
223: is narrower than that of normal Seyfert 1 galaxies and quasars,
224: but typical of NLS1s.
225: The line ratio $[OIII]\lambda5007/H\beta$ is $\simeq 0.12$
226: and is almost independent of the choice of the line profiles.
227: This value indicates that the bulk of the Balmer emission lines do not
228: originate from the narrow line region (NLR) and hence excludes the
229: possibility that 2MASX J0324+3410 is a type 2 AGN, e.g. a NLRG,
230: as was claimed in March$\tilde{\rm a}$ et al. (1996).
231:
232: The optical FeII complexes are rather strong with
233: $EW(FeII\lambda4570)\sim 130\AA$ and $R_{4570}\equiv
234: FeII\lambda4570/H\beta\sim 2.0$, where the FeII blend is
235: integrated from 4434 to 4684 \AA~ for both broad and narrow
236: components with larger EW(FeII) and $R_{4570}$ for the Lorentzian model.
237: Remillard et al. (1993) reported a $R_{4570}=1.54$.
238: In summary, our optical spectrum clearly
239: shows that 2MASX J0324+3410 is a classic NLS1.
240:
241:
242: \subsection{Broad Band Properties and SED}
243:
244: Radiation from 2MASX J0324+3410 was detected in a wide
245: wavelength range across almost the whole electromagnetic spectrum,
246: in the radio, infrared (IRAS and 2MASS), optical band (e.g., Swift UVOT),
247: X-ray and possibly $\gamma$-ray bands.
248: It is a strong radio source with a flux density 304$-$581 mJy at 5 GHz,
249: and shows a flat radio spectrum up to at least 10 GHz and
250: significant flux variations.
251: Using simultaneous observations at 2.695, 4.75, and 10.55 GHz,
252: Neumann et al. (1994) found a
253: flat spectral index, $\alpha\simeq 0.1$, and
254: detected polarization at the 3\%, 5\%, and 4\% level, respectively.
255: A factor of 1.3 variation ( 4$\sigma$ level)
256: in its 1.4 GHz flux on time-scales of ten years was found
257: by comparing the
258: Green Bank 1.4 GHz Northern Sky Survey (GBNSS, White \& Becker 1992) and
259: the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (Condon et al. 1998).
260: Even larger amplitude variations (a factor of 1.6 and 1.9)
261: on shorter time scales (3.5 and 3.3 yrs) were
262: observed at 5 GHz (Neumann et al. 1994; Griffith et al. 1991;
263: Laurent-Muehleisen et al. 1997).
264: These variations are significant at the
265: 3--6 $\sigma$ level, and cannot be attributed to source contamination
266: as the beam sizes for observations at the higher flux states are
267: (fortunately) smaller than those at the lower states.
268: Assuming the flux variability is intrinsic, we can derive a lower limit
269: on the brightness temperature of $5\times 10^{11}~{\mathrm K}$ (c.f., Zhou
270: et al. 2006).
271: This value is an order of magnitude higher than the
272: equipartition value $\sim 5\times 10^{10}$ K (e.g., Readhead
273: 1994)
274: but close to the inverse Compton
275: limit of $10^{12}$ K (Kellermann \& Pauliny-Toth 1969).
276:
277: The source was also observed by the VLBA in the VLBA calibrator survey (VCS).
278: High resolution images at 2.2 GHz and 8.4 GHz reveal a core and a
279: weak extended south-west component 6.8 mas (8.2 pc) away from the
280: core (Beasley et al. 2002).
281: We have re-processed the VLBA data.
282: The core is further resolved into a brightest
283: component in the north-east and an extension towards the south-west,
284: reminiscent of a core--jet structure.
285: The brightest compact component has a deconvolved
286: size of about 0.1 mas (0.12 pc) and a flux of 0.165 Jy at 8.4 GHz,
287: leading to a brightness temperature of about 4$\times 10^{11}$ K,
288: consistent with the estimate from the variability analysis above.
289: The south-west component has a steep radio spectrum and
290: seems to have no proper motion ($<0.05c$; Yuan W. et al. in
291: preparation), and therefore is possibly a weak radio lobe.
292:
293: The radio loudness of 2MASX J0324+3410 is estimated to be
294: $R=f_{5GHz}/f_{\mathrm B}= 38-71$ using the HST magnitude and
295: assuming $\alpha_{opt}=0.5$ for the nucleus.
296: If we adopt the swift UVOT B magnitude of B=16.11 mag, we obtain
297: $R\simeq$89-151, after correction for Galactic extinction. Note
298: that the Swift B magnitude may include some contamination of the
299: galactic light (see last section), so there can be a significant
300: variation between the Swift and HST observations. Since the 5 GHz
301: radio emission is likely
302: subject to substantial enhancement due to the Doppler beaming effect,
303: we try to estimate its `intrinsic radio loudness' using
304: a low-frequency flux, which is thought to be less
305: affected by Doppler boosting.
306: Assuming typical spectral indices $\alpha_r=0.7-1.0$ for the extended radio
307: components, we find an `intrinsic radio loudness' 4--25 from the radio
308: flux 1.02 Jy at 151 MHz (Hales, Baldwin \& Warner 1993).
309: This puts 2MASX J0324+3410 in the class of radio intermediate quasars.
310: Its radio power, at 178 MHz, $P_{178{\mathrm MHz}}\lesssim
311: 8\times 10^{24}~{\mathrm W~Hz}^{-1}$, as interpolated from the one at
312: 151 MHz, is below the dividing line separating the FR~II and FR~I types.
313:
314: X-ray emission as well as hard X-ray (and perhaps even $\gamma$-ray)
315: flares have been detected from 2MASX J0324+3410 by various instruments.
316: For observations with ROSAT and Swift,
317: we reduced the publicly available
318: data to derive the X-ray spectra and fluxes;
319: for the rest of the data sets (mainly sky monitor type instruments),
320: we made use of the X-ray count rates provided as available from NED.
321: Hard X-ray emission was detected
322: with the HEDs (High Energy Detectors, 2.6--60~keV) on-board HEAO-1
323: at three epochs over a time span of one year,
324: when it showed decreasing averaged count rates
325: from $1.25\pm 0.39~cts~s^{-1}$ to $0.01\pm 0.26~cts~s^{-1}$.
326: It was also detected in the ROSAT All Sky Survey (RASS),
327: with a 0.1--2.4\,keV flux of
328: 3.1$\pm0.5\times 10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ in
329: the observed frame and corrected for the Galactic absorption
330: ($N_H^G=1.45~10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$, (Dickey \& Lockman 1990).
331: 2MASX J0324+3410 has been monitored
332: by the All Sky Monitor (ASM)
333: on-board Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) since June 1996.
334: The average ASM count rate over the last ten years is 0.0343$\pm$0.0065 cts~s
335: $^{-1}$, converting to a 2--10\,keV flux of $F_X=9.0\times10^{-12}$
336: ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.
337: The most recent X-ray observation was done by the Swift X-ray
338: Telescope (XRT) in July 2006.
339: The spectrum in the 0.3-10~keV band can be well
340: fitted with a power-law of a photon index 2.02$\pm$0.06
341: with Galactic absorption.
342: X-ray flux variations up to a factor of two on
343: time-scales less than 1~ks have been detected in the Swift data.
344: The average flux in the 0.2--2.4 keV band was
345: 3 times brighter than that measured in the RASS.
346: Detailed analysis of the X-ray data-sets will be presented
347: in a future paper (Yuan W. et al.
348: in preparation). Of particular interest,
349: a TeV flare was claimed to be marginally detected
350: at a significance level of
351: $\sim 2.5-3.3~\sigma$ on October 10, 2001 with the Whipple imaging air
352: Cerenkov telescope at the Whipple Observatory (Falcone et al. 2004).
353: The average $\gamma$-ray count rate was $0.46\pm 0.14$ times that
354: of the Crab, with a peak rate $0.62\pm 0.19$ Crab.
355:
356: The broad band spectral energy distribution
357: (SED) for the nucleus of 2MASX J0324+3410
358: is plotted in Figure \ref{f2},
359: using the results of our own data as well as
360: data collected through the HEASARC web browser.
361: For comparison, the SED for IZw 1 and Mrk 421---a
362: well known NLS1 and blazar, respectively--are
363: over-plotted.
364: It can be seen that 2MASX J0324+3410 resembles
365: Mrk 421 in terms of the broad band, non-thermal continuum
366: in the radio and possibly X-ray bands,
367: whereas it resembles IZw 1 in the infrared--optical regime
368: where thermal emission is dominant.
369:
370: \subsection{The host galaxy --- a one-armed spiral?}
371:
372: Two snapshot images of 2MASX J0324+3410, each of 200\,s exposure,
373: were taken with the second
374: Wide Field and Planetary Camera (HST/WFPC2) of
375: the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) with the
376: F702W filter ($\lambda_{eff}=6919~\AA$).
377: The data were retrieved from the HST archive.
378: The two exposures were combined to create a single image
379: with a better S/N ratio.
380: A ring-like structure of $\sim 15^{''}$ diameter
381: can be clearly seen, which corresponds to $\sim 15.6$~kpc
382: at redshift 0.0629.
383: A nuclear source with high surface brightness
384: is apparently displaced from the symmetric center of the host galaxy.
385: Thanks to the superb spatial resolution of $\lesssim 0^{''}.1$ of HST,
386: we were able to extract the surface brightness profile of the
387: galaxy and decompose it into two components:
388: an unresolved point-like source
389: as the NLS1 nucleus, and a S{\'e}rsic model for the host galaxy
390: (detailed analysis is to be presented in a later paper).
391: We find $m_{NLS1,F702}=15.15 $~mag for the active nucleus, and
392: $m_{bulge,F702}=15.22$~mag for the host galaxy.
393: After correcting for the Galactic extinction E(B-V)=0.213 Mag
394: we get $m_{NLS1, F702}\thickapprox 14.70$~mag. The residual looks
395: like a one-armed spiral (see Fig 1b).
396:
397: \section{Discussion: a NLS1--blazar composite}
398:
399: The spectral and temporal properties of 2MASX J0324+3410
400: in the radio and X-ray
401: bands, as presented in Sect.~2.2,
402: are characteristic of blazars:
403: a flat radio spectrum and flux variability,
404: a compact and bright radio core on milli-arcsec
405: scale, hard X-ray emission and flares,
406: short timescale variations in X-rays,
407: and a broad band, non-thermal continuum.
408: In particular, its SED and possible TeV $\gamma$-ray emission
409: resemble those of a high-energy peaked blazar (HBL).
410: On the other hand, its optical properties fulfill all criteria for
411: classification as NLS1.
412: These observational facts thus make 2MASX J0324+3410
413: a composite of a NLS1 and a blazar.
414: We note that the rest frame H$\beta$
415: equivalent width $EW(H\beta)=58\pm 4$\AA~ is only
416: slightly below the median value ($\backsimeq 80~\AA$) for a large sample
417: of NLS1s (Zhou et al. 2006), i.e. the contribution from a potential
418: non-thermal continuum is small in the optical.
419: If the X-ray to optical spectral slope is similar to that of
420: I ZW 1 for the NLS1 component, the NLS1 accounts for only
421: $\sim$1/3 of the observed X-ray emission, which also has a
422: flat spectrum compared with other NLS1s.
423: Its radio and most likely X-ray radiation can be naturally
424: explained as being from a jet (via synchrotron emission),
425: while the infrared and optical light is dominated by
426: thermal emission from a Seyfert nucleus.
427:
428: We estimate the central black hole (BH) mass using a few methods.
429: Using the width and luminosity of the H$\beta$ line and the
430: empirical scaling relations as in Greene \& Ho (2005), we find
431: a BH mass of 10$^7 M_{\mathrm \odot}$. While the empirical
432: relations of Vestergaard \& Peterson (2006) give BH masses of
433: 3$\times10^7 M_{\mathrm \odot}$
434: using the continuum luminosity at 5100\AA and
435: 1.8$\times 10^7 M_{\mathrm \odot}$ using the H$\beta$ luminosity.
436: These BH mass estimates\footnote{
437: We note that a higher black hole mass of
438: $8\times10^7 M_{\mathrm \odot}$
439: is estimated if one uses the line dispersion instead of the
440: {\it FWHM}, following Collin et al. (2006).
441: } are consistent within their
442: uncertainties, giving $M_{BH}\sim 10^{7}~M_{\odot}$.
443: Interestingly, this value falls into the overlapping region
444: in the BH mass distributions for NLS1s and blazars,
445: which have the bulk lying within $10^{6-7}~M_{\odot}$
446: (e.g., Wang \& Lu 2001; Grupe \& Mathur 2004; Zhou et al. 2006)
447: and $10^{7-9}~M_{\odot}$
448: (e.g., Woo et al. 2005, Falomo et al. 2002), respectively.
449:
450: We estimate the bolometric luminosity from the 5100\AA
451: luminosity using the correction factor
452: for quasars given by Elvis et al. (1994).
453: This gives $L_{\rm bol}\thickapprox 1.2~10^{45}~erg~s^{-1}$.
454: We thus obtain a rough estimate of the Eddington ratio
455: $\dot{m}\equiv L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}\thickapprox 0.1$
456: for 2MASX J0324+3410.
457: The Eddington ratio is typical of NLS1s,
458: and resembles FSRQ as far as its blazar property is concerned;
459: however, the SED of its jet emission is more like
460: HBLs, which have, on the contrary,
461: generally low accretion rates.
462: The one-armed spiral may provide such fueling to the
463: active nucleus, though
464: it cannot be completely ruled out that the HST image we see is
465: a structure made up by dust lanes or even a ring galaxy.
466:
467: 2MASX J0324+3410 is not unique,
468: but is the most representative object of its kind,
469: which seem to be rare.
470: The optical spectrum of the BL Lac object 0846+51W1
471: showed typical NLS1 characteristics at low states (Zhou et al. 2005).
472: The radio-to-optical SED of the radio loud NLS1
473: J094857.3+002225, for which beaming is required to explain the high brightness
474: temperature, is also similar to that of 2MASX J0324+3410 (Zhou et al.
475: 2004; also Doi et al. 2006).
476: A third example is RXJ 16290+4007 (Zhou \& Wang
477: 2002; also Komossa et al. 2006b),
478: a flat-spectrum radio quasar with NLS1 characteristics in the optical.
479: Furthermore, 8 out of the 9 very-radio-loud
480: (VRL, $R_{1.4}\equiv f_{1.4GHz}/f_{B}\gtrsim 250$) NLS1s
481: currently under study (Zhou et al. 2006b in preparation)
482: show flat radio spectra:
483: \footnote{
484: the only exception so far is
485: SDSS~J172206.03+565451.6 with $\alpha_{0.33-1.4GHz}=0.7$
486: (Komossa et al. 2006b).
487: },
488: $\alpha_{1.4-5GHz}
489: \lesssim 0.5$, $f_{\nu}\propto\nu^{-\alpha}$, which is remarkable.
490: Thus, it is probably true that most VRL NLS1s are actually
491: radio intermediate (RI) NLS1s with boosted jet emission (Zhou et al.
492: 2006b). If so, they are similar to a population of boosted RI quasars
493: recently identified by Wang et al (2006) from their high radio
494: brightness temperature, but with more extreme optical properties.
495: They may be an analog to the radio-bright, very high soft states in
496: black hole binaries (e.g., Fender, Belloni \& Gallo 2004).
497:
498: The hybrid state of 2MASX J0324+3410 raises questions to the current
499: understanding of TeV/high-energy peaked blazars.
500: It is widely accepted that this type of blazar have
501: very low accretion rates, but 2MASX J0324+3410 is
502: doubtlessly an exception. A common notion is that the intensive radiation
503: field of the accretion disk prevents electrons from gaining the high energies
504: that are required for TeV $\gamma$-ray production or the formation of high
505: frequency synchrotron peaks in the SED. This is certainly not the case for
506: 2MASX J0324+3410.
507:
508: \acknowledgments We thank Jianyan Wei and Jing Wang for help in
509: our spectroscopic observations, and Dirk Grupe and Binbin Zhang in the
510: analysis of the swift data. This work was supported by Chinese
511: NSF through NSF10233030, NSF10533050 and NSF10473013, and the
512: Bairen Project of CAS. D.W. Xu acknowledges the Chinese NSF support
513: through NSFC10503005. This paper has made use of data from NED.
514:
515:
516: \begin{thebibliography}{}
517:
518: \bibitem[Beasley et al.(2002)]{2002ApJS..141...13B} Beasley, A.~J., Gordon,
519: D., Peck, A.~B., Petrov, L., MacMillan, D.~S., Fomalont, E.~B., \&
520: Ma, C.\ 2002, \apjs, 141, 13
521:
522: %\bibitem[Beasley \& Conway(1995)]{1995ASPC...82..328B} Beasley, A.~J., \&
523: %Conway, J.~E.\ 1995, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 82: Very Long Baseline Interferometry
524: %and the VLBA, 82, 328
525:
526: \bibitem[Boller et al.(1996)]{1996A&A...305...53B} Boller, T., Brandt,
527: W.~N., \& Fink, H.\ 1996, \aap, 305, 53
528:
529: \bibitem[Boroson \& Green(1992)]{1992ApJS...80..109B} Boroson, T.~A., \&
530: Green, R.~F.\ 1992, \apjs, 80, 109
531:
532: \bibitem[Boroson(2002)]{2002ApJ...565...78B} Boroson, T.~A.\ 2002, \apj,
533: 565, 78
534:
535: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{1998AJ....115.1693C} Condon, J.~J., Cotton,
536: W.~D., Greisen, E.~W., Yin, Q.~F., Perley, R.~A., Taylor, G.~B.,
537: \& Broderick, J.~J.\ 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
538:
539: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{1990ARA&A..28..215D} Dickey, J.~M., \&
540: Lockman, F.~J.\ 1990, \araa, 28, 215
541:
542: \bibitem[Doi et al. (2006)]{doi06} Doi, A. et al., 2006, PASJ, accepted (astro-ph/0608507)
543:
544: \bibitem[Elvis et al.(1994)]{1994ApJS...95....1E} Elvis, M., et al.\ 1994,
545: \apjs, 95, 1
546:
547: \bibitem[Falcone et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...613..710F} Falcone, A.~D., et al.\
548: 2004, \apj, 613, 710
549:
550: \bibitem[Fender et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.355.1105F} Fender, R.~P., Belloni,
551: T.~M., \& Gallo, E.\ 2004, \mnras, 355, 1105
552:
553: %\bibitem[Ferrarese \& Merritt(2000)]{2000ApJ...539L...9F} Ferrarese, L., \&
554: %Merritt, D.\ 2000, \apjl, 539, L9
555:
556: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho (2005)]{2005ApJ...630..122G} Greene, J.~E., \& Ho,
557: L.~C.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 122
558:
559: \bibitem[Griffith et al.(1991)]{1991ApJS...75..801G} Griffith, M., Heflin,
560: M., Conner, S., Burke, B., \& Langston, G.\ 1991, \apjs, 75, 801
561:
562: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(1998)]{1998A&A...330...25G} Grupe, D., Beuermann, K.,
563: Thomas, H.-C., Mannheim, K., \& Fink, H.~H.\ 1998, \aap, 330, 25
564:
565: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(1999)]{1999A&A...350..805G} Grupe, D., Beuermann, K.,
566: Mannheim, K., \& Thomas, H.-C.\ 1999, \aap, 350, 805
567:
568: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2000)]{2000A&A...356...11G} Grupe, D., Leighly,
569: K.~M., Thomas, H.-C., \& Laurent-Muehleisen, S.~A.\ 2000, \aap,
570: 356, 11
571:
572: \bibitem[Grupe \& Mathur(2004)]{2004ApJ...606L..41G} Grupe, D., \& Mathur,
573: S.\ 2004, \apjl, 606, L41
574:
575:
576: \bibitem[Kellermann \& Pauliny-Toth(1969)]{1969ApJ...155L..71K} Kellermann,
577: K.~I., \& Pauliny-Toth, I.~I.~K.\ 1969, \apjl, 155, L71
578:
579: \bibitem[Komossa et al.(2006a)]{2006ApJ...639..710K} Komossa, S., Voges, W.,
580: Adorf, H.-M., Xu, D., Mathur, S., \& Anderson, S.~F.\ 2006a, \apj,
581: 639, 710
582:
583: \bibitem[Komossa et al.(2006b)]{2006AJ....132..531K} Komossa, S., Voges, W.,
584: Xu, D., Mathur, S., Adorf, H.-M., Lemson, G., Duschl, W.~J., \& Grupe, D.\
585: 2006b, \aj, 132, 531
586:
587: \bibitem[Komossa \& Meerschweinchen(2000)]{2000A&A....354..411} Komossa, S.,
588: Meerschweinchen, J., 2000, A\&A 354, 411
589:
590: \bibitem[Laurent-Muehleisen et al.(1997)]{1997A&AS..122..235L}
591: Laurent-Muehleisen, S.~A., Kollgaard, R.~I., Ryan, P.~J.,
592: Feigelson, E.~D., Brinkmann, W., \& Siebert, J.\ 1997, \aaps, 122,
593: 235
594:
595: \bibitem[Leighly(1999)]{1999ApJS..125..297L} Leighly, K.~M.\ 1999, \apjs,
596: 125, 297
597:
598: \bibitem[Leighly \& Moore(2004)]{2004ApJ...611..107L} Leighly, K.~M., \&
599: Moore, J.~R.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 107
600:
601: \bibitem[Marcha et al.(1996)]{1996MNRAS.281..425M} Marcha, M.~J.~M.,
602: Browne, I.~W.~A., Impey, C.~D., \& Smith, P.~S.\ 1996, \mnras,
603: 281, 425
604:
605: %\bibitem[Nelson et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...615..652N} Nelson, C.~H., Green,
606: %R.~F., Bower, G., Gebhardt, K., \& Weistrop, D.\ 2004, \apj, 615,
607: %652
608:
609: \bibitem[Neumann et al.(1994)]{1994A&AS..106..303N} Neumann, M., Reich, W.,
610: Fuerst, E., Brinkmann, W., Reich, P., Siebert, J., Wielebinski,
611: R., \& Truemper, J.\ 1994, \aaps, 106, 303
612:
613: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Pogge(1985)]{1985ApJ...297..166O} Osterbrock, D.~E.,
614: \& Pogge, R.~W.\ 1985, \apj, 297, 166
615:
616: \bibitem[Puchnarewicz et al.(1992)]{1992MNRAS.256..589P} Puchnarewicz,
617: E.~M., et al.\ 1992, \mnras, 256, 589
618:
619: \bibitem[Readhead(1994)]{1994ApJ...426...51R} Readhead, A.~C.~S.\ 1994,
620: \apj, 426, 51
621:
622: \bibitem[Remillard et al.(1993)]{1993AJ....105.2079R} Remillard, R.~A.,
623: Bradt, H.~V.~D., Brissenden, R.~J.~V., Buckley, D.~A.~H., Roberts,
624: W., Schwartz, D.~A., Stroozas, B.~A., \& Tuohy, I.~R.\ 1993, \aj,
625: 105, 2079
626:
627: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...536L...5S} Sulentic, J.~W.,
628: Zwitter, T., Marziani, P., \& Dultzin-Hacyan, D.\ 2000, \apjl,
629: 536, L5
630:
631: \bibitem[Urry \& Padovani(1995)]{1995PASP..107..803U} Urry, C.~M., \&
632: Padovani, P.\ 1995, \pasp, 107, 803
633:
634: \bibitem[V{\'e}ron-Cetty et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...372..730V}
635: V{\'e}ron-Cetty, M.-P., V{\'e}ron, P., \& Gon{\c c}alves, A.~C.\
636: 2001, \aap, 372, 730
637:
638: \bibitem[Vestergaard \& Peterson(2006)]{2006ApJ...641..689V} Vestergaard,
639: M., \& Peterson, B.~M.\ 2006, \apj, 641, 689
640:
641: \bibitem[Wang \& Lu(2001)]{2001A&A...377...52W} Wang, T., \& Lu, Y.\ 2001,
642: \aap, 377, 52
643:
644: \bibitem[Wang et al.(1996)]{1996A&A...309...81W} Wang, T., Brinkmann, W.,
645: \& Bergeron, J.\ 1996, \aap, 309, 81
646:
647: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...645..856W} Wang, T.-G., Zhou, H.-Y.,
648: Wang, J.-X., Lu, Y.-J., \& Lu, Y.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 856
649:
650: \bibitem[White \& Becker(1992)]{1992ApJS...79..331W} White, R.~L., \&
651: Becker, R.~H.\ 1992, \apjs, 79, 331
652:
653: \bibitem[Zhou et al.(2006)]{2006ApJS} Zhou, H.-Y., Wang, T.-G., Yuan, W.,
654: Lu, H.-L., Dong, X.-B., Wang, J.-X., Lu, Y.-J., 2006, \apjs, 166, 128
655:
656: \bibitem[Zhou et al.(2005)]{2005ChJAA...5...41Z} Zhou, H.-Y., Wang, T.-G.,
657: Dong, X.-B., Li, C., \& Zhang, X.-G.\ 2005, Chinese Journal of
658: Astronony and Astrophysics, 5, 41
659:
660: \bibitem[Zhou et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...584..147Z} Zhou, H.-Y., Wang, T.-G.,
661: Dong, X.-B., Zhou, Y.-Y., \& Li, C.\ 2003, \apj, 584, 147
662:
663: \bibitem[Zhou \& Wang(2002)]{2002ChJAA...2..501Z} Zhou, H.-Y., \& Wang,
664: T.-G.\ 2002, Chinese Journal of Astronony and Astrophysics, 2, 501
665:
666:
667: \end{thebibliography}
668:
669: \begin{figure}
670: %\epsscale{0.8}
671: \plotone{fig1.ps}
672: \caption{Observed spectrum of 2MASX
673: J0324+3410 and the best fit model (the green line).} \label{f1}
674: \end{figure}
675:
676: \begin{figure}
677: %\epsscale{0.8}
678: \plotone{fig2.ps}
679: \caption{Broad band spectral energy
680: distribution of 2MASX J0324+3410 (green diamonds). A typical NLS1,
681: IZw 1 (black triangles), and a typical TeV blazar, Mrk 421 (cross), are
682: also plotted for comparison. The 2-order polynomial (parabolic)
683: fit of the radio and X-ray data of 2MASX J0324+3410; and of the radio, IR,
684: and X-ray data of Mrk 421 is shown as dashed and dotted line,
685: respectively. Data apart from those described in the text were retrieved
686: from the HEASARC browser server (http:\/\/heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov\
687: /cgi-bin\/W3Browse.).
688: Inset: a residual image after subtraction of the best-fit
689: model of a point source plus a Sersic component from the HST
690: WFPC image. The similarity with a one-armed spiral-like structure
691: can be clearly seen.}
692: \label{f2}
693: \end{figure}
694:
695: \clearpage
696:
697: \end{document}
698:
699:
700: