1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%% PASJ LaTeX template for draft(body)<2003/01/21>
3: %%%
4: %%% IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR AUTHORS
5: %%% 1. ``\draft'' creates single column and double spaces format.
6: %%% 2. If you comment out ``\draft'', the output will be double column
7: %%% and single space.
8: %%% 3. For cross-references, the use of \label/\ref/\cite and the
9: %%% thebibliography environment is strongly recommended
10: %%% 4. Do NOT use \def/\renewcommand.
11: %%% 5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.
12: %%%
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: \documentclass{pasj00}
15: \draft
16:
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \SetRunningHead{Author(s) in page-head}{Running Head}
20: \Received{2007/01/09}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
21: \Accepted{2007/02/09}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
22:
23: \title{CO Observations of a FeLoBAL Quasar with an H$\alpha$ Absorption
24: Line at $z=2.3$}
25:
26: %%% begin:list of authors
27: % Do NOT capitalize all letters in "textsc".
28: \author{
29: Kouji \textsc{Ohta}\altaffilmark{1},
30: Gaku \textsc{Kiuchi}\altaffilmark{1},
31: % \thanks{Example: Present Address is xxxxxxxxxx}}
32: Kouichiro \textsc{Nakanishi}\altaffilmark{2},
33: Kentaro \textsc{Aoki}\altaffilmark{3},
34: Ikuru \textsc{Iwata}\altaffilmark{4}, \\
35: Masayuki \textsc{Akiyama}\altaffilmark{3},
36: Naoyuki \textsc{Tamura}\altaffilmark{3},
37: and
38: Masataka \textsc{Ando}\altaffilmark{1}}
39: %\and
40: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502}
41: \email{ohta@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
42: \altaffiltext{2}{Nobeyama Radio Observatory, Minamimaki Minamisaku, Nagano 384-1305}
43: \altaffiltext{3}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of
44: Japan, 650 N. A'ohoku Place, Hilo, \\ HI 96720, USA}
45: \altaffiltext{4}{Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory, Okayama 719-0232}
46:
47: %%% end:list of authors
48:
49: %%% Please use the following style in case that sorting by
50: %%% affilation is impossible.
51: %
52: % \author{%
53: % D-Firstname \textsc{D-Familyname}\altaffilmark{1}
54: % E-Firstname \textsc{E-Familyname}\altaffilmark{1,2}
55: % and
56: % F-Firstname \textsc{F-Familyname}\altaffilmark{2}}
57: % \altaffiltext{1}{Address of Institute}
58: % \email{ddddd@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
59: % \email{eeeee@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
60: % \altaffiltext{2}{Address of Institute}
61:
62: %% `\KeyWords{}' always has to be placed before `\maketitle'.
63: \KeyWords{ galaxies:active --- galaxies:quasars:emission lines ---
64: galaxies:quasars:individual (SDSS J083942.11+380526.3)}
65: %Do NOT move this preamble from here!
66:
67: \maketitle
68:
69: \begin{abstract}
70: SDSS J083942.11+380526.3 is an Iron Low-ionization Broad Absorption Line
71: (FeLoBAL) quasar at $z = 2.3$, and Aoki et al. (2006) recently found
72: the presence of an H$\alpha$ absorption line in the broad H$\alpha$ emission line.
73: Motivated by an idea that this quasar may be a huge molecular gas
74: reservoir in the early phase of quasar evolution, we made
75: CO($J=3-2$) observations of it using the Nobeyama Millimeter Array.
76: No significant CO emission was detected; although an emission-like feature
77: ($2.5\sigma$) was seen close ($\sim 2''$) to the quasar,
78: we regard it as a noise.
79: The obtained 3$\sigma$ upper limit on the CO luminosity is
80: $L^{\prime}_{{\rm CO}(J=3-2)} = 4.5 \times 10^{10}$ K km s$^{-1}$ pc$^2$,
81: which corresponds to $M({\rm H}_2) = 3.6 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ if we
82: adopt the CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor of 0.8 $M_{\odot}$ (K km
83: s$^{-1}$ pc$^2)^{-1}$.
84: This upper limit is comparable to
85: $L^{\prime}_{{\rm CO}(J=3-2)}$ (and thus the molecular gas mass) detected
86: in quasars and BAL quasars at $z=1-3$, and
87: no sign of the presence of the huge amount of molecular gas in this
88: FeLoBAL quasar was obtained.
89: \end{abstract}
90:
91:
92: \section{Introduction}
93:
94: %\noindent IMPORTANT NOTICE\\
95: %1. ``\verb|\draft|'' creates single column and double spaces format.\\
96: %2. If you comment out ``\verb|\draft|'', the output will be double column
97: % and single space.\\
98: %3. For cross-references, the use of ``\verb|\label|, \verb|\ref|, \verb|\cite|''
99: % and the thebibliography environment is strongly recommended. \\
100: %4. Do NOT use ``\verb|\def|, \verb|\renewcommand|''.\\
101: %5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.\\
102:
103: FeLoBAL (iron LoBAL) quasars are a rare subclass of
104: broad absorption-line quasars (BAL quasars) recently
105: emerging thanks to the large sample of the Sloan Digital Sky
106: Survey (SDSS).
107: % (Trump et al. 2006).
108: BAL quasars show broad (2,000 -- 20,000 km s$^{-1}$) blueshifted
109: (2,000 -- 60,000 km s$^{-1}$) absorption lines in the UV wavelength
110: region.
111: BAL quasars showing high-ionization absorption lines such as C IV, N V, Si IV,
112: and Ly$\alpha$ are called HiBAL quasars, and some BAL quasars also show
113: low-ionization absorption lines of Mg II, Al II, and Al III
114: in addition to the high-ionization absorption lines,
115: which are called LoBAL quasars.
116: About 10 -- 20 \% of optically selected quasars are BAL (HiBAL)
117: quasars and $\sim 10$\% of them are LoBAL quasars (Weymann et al. 1991;
118: Hewett \& Foltz 2003; Reichard et al. 2003; Trump et al. 2006).
119: There is a subclass of LoBAL quasars which show numbers of
120: absorption lines originated in Fe II and Fe III (Hazard et al. 1987;
121: Cowie et al. 1994; Becker et al. 1997, 2000; Reichard et al. 2003;
122: Hall et al. 2002).
123: They are called iron LoBAL (FeLoBAL) quasars and occupy about
124: 15 \% of LoBAL quasars (Hall et al. 2002).
125:
126: Nature of BAL quasars is still not well understood.
127: There are two major views for BAL quasars: BAL quasars are non-BAL
128: quasars seen with a different viewing angle (e.g., Weymann et al. 1991;
129: Schmidt \& Hines 1999), and BAL quasars are young or recently
130: refueled quasars (e.g., Boroson \& Meyers 1992; Becker et al. 2000).
131: In the latter view, the broad absorption lines appear when a nucleus is
132: blowing gas and dust out during a dust-enshroud quasar phase which
133: leads the BAL quasars to non-BAL quasars.
134: If this view is correct, BAL quasars (especially LoBAL quasars)
135: are expected to also be ultra-luminous
136: infrared galaxies.
137: In fact, all four LoBAL and FeLoBAL quasars known to date at
138: $z < 0.4$
139: have the infrared luminosities larger than $10^{12} L_{\odot}$
140: (Canalizo \& Stockton 2002).
141: Furthermore, Reichard et al. (2003) show that average UV spectrum
142: is getting flatter in the order of non-BAL, HiBAL, LoBAL, and FeLoBAL
143: quasars and the color excesses amount $E(B-V)\sim 0.023$ mag and $\sim
144: 0.077$ mag for HiBAL and LoBAL quasars,
145: respectively with Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC)-like reddening law.
146: The average UV spectrum of FeLoBAL quasars is much flatter than those
147: (Reichard et al. 2003)
148: and hence FeLoBAL quasars may be the most obscured ones among BAL quasars.
149: %FeLoBAL may occupy a new parameter space in quasar
150: %population or may be in a very young phase from dust enshroud
151: %quasars to normal quasars.
152: Thus a large amount of gas and dust may exist in LoBAL quasars,
153: especially in FeLoBAL quasars.
154:
155: We found a FeLoBAL quasar at $z=2.3$ with an H$\alpha$ absorption line in
156: the broad H$\alpha$ emission line.
157: The object, SDSS J083942.11+380526.3 (hereafter SDSS J0839+3805),
158: was originally found during our search for FeLoBAL quasars at $z=2.1 - 2.8$
159: by visual inspection of $\sim 4,800$ spectra in the SDSS Data Release 3
160: (DR3; Abazajian et al. 2005).
161: The color excess of SDSS J0839+3805 is $E(B-V) \sim 0.15$ mag
162: with the SMC-like reddening law if the intrinsic spectrum is the
163: same as a composite spectrum of non-BAL quasars,
164: suggesting the presence of larger obscuration than typical LoBAL quasars.
165: Subsequent near-infrared spectroscopy with the Cooled Infrared
166: Spectrograph and Camera
167: % (CISCO)
168: for OH Suppressor
169: %(OHS)
170: attached to the Subaru telescope
171: revealed the presence of H$\alpha$ absorption line in the broad
172: H$\alpha$ emission line (Aoki et al. 2006).
173: The absorption line is not originated in stellar continuum.
174: The absolute magnitude in the $i$-band is $-26.8$ mag (AB),
175: and this was the first discovery of such system in quasars;
176: only known such system was Seyfert 1 NGC 4151 at that time.
177: Very recently, two more FeLoBALs have been found to show Balmer
178: absorption lines (Hall 2007; Aoki et al. 2007).
179: The width of the absorption line in SDSS J0839+3805 is $\sim 340$ km s$^{-1}$
180: with a blue shift of $\sim$ 520 km s$^{-1}$ relative to the H$\alpha$
181: emission line.
182: The equivalent width of the absorption line is estimated to be
183: $4.9-8.0$\AA\ depending on the employed intrinsic line profile of
184: the H$\alpha$ broad emission line.
185: The equivalent width corresponds to a column density of neutral
186: hydrogen of $\sim 10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$ if we assume a gas temperature
187: of $10^4$ K from the curve of growth (see Aoki et al. 2006 for details).
188: %The value of the column density has a large uncertainty.
189: %However
190: It suggests that SDSS J0839+3805 may be a large gas
191: reservoir in the very young phase from a ultra-luminous infrared
192: galaxy to a quasar.
193: Motivated by these, we made CO observations of SDSS J0839+3805 aimed
194: at detecting the molecular gases.
195: In this paper, we adopt the flat cosmology of
196: $H_0 = 70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3$, and
197: $\Omega_{\Lambda} =0.7$ .
198:
199: %\newpage
200:
201: \section{Observations}
202: %In figure \ref{fig:sample}, ...
203: CO ($J=3-2$) observations were made with the Nobeyama Millimeter Array
204: (NMA) at the Nobeyama Radio Observatory
205: \footnote{The Nobeyama Radio Observatory is a branch of
206: the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
207: the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS).}
208: from 2005 November 27 to December 1 with C-configuration and
209: from 2006 March 15 to March 18 and from 2006 April 3 to April 5
210: with D-configuration (more compact than C-configuration).
211: The expected observed frequency for the redshifted CO ($J=3-2$)
212: line is 104.221 GHz based on the redshift
213: determined with H$\alpha$ emission ($z=2.318\pm0.002$),
214: which would give the most reliable systemic redshift of the host galaxy.
215: The accuracy we achieved corresponds to a velocity uncertainty
216: of only about 180 km s$^{-1}$, which is
217: negligibly small for the Ultra Wide Band Correlator
218: (UWBC, Okumura et al. 2000) used covering 1024 MHz
219: ($\sim 3000$ km s$^{-1}$).
220: In actual observations, however, we adopted the central frequency
221: of 104.477 GHz to avoid the exact center of the spectrograph.
222: This displacement also does not cause a serious frequency coverage
223: problem.
224: % thanks to the very wide velocity coverage of UWBC.
225: A field of view was $\sim 65^{\prime\prime}$, and
226: angular resolutions were 2$^{\prime\prime}$--3$^{\prime\prime}$
227: and 4$^{\prime\prime}$--6$^{\prime\prime}$
228: for C- and D-configuration, respectively.
229: A total integration time was 25 and 17 hours for the C- and the
230: D-configuration, respectively.
231: The reference calibration was made with radio source of B0821+394 for
232: each observation.
233: The flux calibration and band-pass calibration were made
234: with 3C273 ($22.54$ Jy at 105.7 GHz)
235: for C-configuration in November 2005 and D-configuration
236: in March 2006, and 3C84 ($6.43$ Jy at 110.2 GHz)
237: for D-configuration in April 2006.
238: The uncertainty in the flux scale calibrations was estimated
239: to be $\sim10$\% for each observation.
240: The weather conditions were fine during the observing runs
241: with the C-configuration and the second run of the D-configuration.
242: %(the radio seeings were xx$^{\prime\prime}$. Do we need seeing?)
243:
244: The uv-data reduction was carried out by UVPROC-II package
245: developed at the Nobeyama Radio Observatory (Tsutsumi et al. 1997).
246: After discarding bad visibilities and calibrating visibilities,
247: we produced channel maps and an integrated intensity map using
248: NRAO AIPS package for each configuration.
249: The rms noises in the maps were 3.6 mJy beam$^{-1}$ and 5.0 mJy beam$^{-1}$
250: for C- and D-configuration, respectively with a velocity
251: bin of 184 km s$^{-1}$.
252: Finally, we made the integrated intensity map using the combined data
253: taken with C- and D-configurations.
254: The synthesis beam size was $4^{\prime\prime}.0 \times
255: 3^{\prime\prime}.0$
256: and the rms noise was 2.9 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
257:
258: \section{Results and Discussion}
259: A contour map centered at 104.22 GHz integrated in the 184 km s$^{-1}$ velocity
260: bin obtained with the C-configuration is shown in left panel of figure 1.
261: A signal-like feature is seen
262: %at 104.22 GHz
263: at $\sim 2^{\prime\prime}$ southeast of the quasar position;
264: the peak value in the map is 9 mJy beam$^{-1}$ with a significance of
265: $\sim 2.5 \sigma$.
266: % 5.5 mJy beam$^{-1}$. The velocity width was about
267: The width of the feature is about 300 km s$^{-1}$.
268: The feature was seen in each observing date with a worse significance level.
269: It should be noted that the position of the quasar is taken from SDSS catalog
270: and its accuracy is less than 0.$^{\prime\prime}$1
271: % (typically 0.$^{\prime\prime}$06)
272: (Pier et al. 2003), and the accuracy of the astrometry in the NMA
273: observations is expected to be fairly less than $1^{\prime\prime}$.
274:
275: However, in a contour map obtained with the D-configuration (the middle
276: panel of figure 1), the feature did not appear; if the feature is real
277: it corresponds to be 1.8$\sigma$ in the data obtained with
278: D-configuration.
279: We made the map for each of the two observing runs with
280: D-configuration, but we could not see the emission-like feature.
281: Although we examined the data taken with the C-configuration
282: and D-configuration carefully to see whether some spurious data exist or not,
283: we could not find such spurious data.
284: %However since the emission-like feature was getting weaker by combining
285: %the data of D-configuration, we judged the feature is noise.
286:
287: In the combined data (C- and D-configurations),
288: %the rms noise is 2.9 mJy beam$^{-1}$ with the velocity bin of 184 km s$^{-1}$,
289: %and the synthesis beam size was
290: %$4^{\prime\prime}.0 \times 3^{\prime\prime}.0$.
291: the map integrated with the velocity bin of 184 km s$^{-1}$
292: centered at the 104.22 GHz is shown in the right panel of figure 1.
293: %As seen in figure 1,
294: No emission feature with a significance larger
295: than 3$\sigma$ is present.
296: The 2.5$\sigma$ feature is seen at about 2$^{\prime\prime}$ northeast of
297: the quasar position, but this position does not coincide with the
298: peak of the feature seen in the C-configuration.
299: If the feature is real and we see the molecular gas in the
300: quasar, the displacement of $\sim2^{\prime\prime}$ of the feature
301: might be due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of the emission.
302: Alternatively, the displacement (a projected distance of
303: 16 kpc at the redshift) might be real.
304: A double peaked distribution of molecular gas was not unusual
305: in high redshift quasars (Klamer et al. 2004);
306: for instance in the quasar BR 1202-0725 at $z=4.7$, no host galaxy has been
307: found for a molecular gas component separated by 4$^{\prime\prime}$
308: (projected distance of 26 kpc at the redshift)
309: from the quasar position (Carilli et al. 2002).
310: Thus there might be a case that the molecular gas in the quasar
311: itself is not rich, while it is gas rich in a putative close companion.
312: In any cases, however, the feature only shows the $2.5 \sigma$ significance
313: at most.
314: The feature is not seen in the D-configuration data and
315: the location seen in the combined data is different from that
316: seen in the C-configuration data.
317: Therefore we regard that this feature is not real and derive
318: the upper limit on the molecular gas mass below.
319:
320: From the rms noise, we set the upper limit on the CO luminosity
321: as well as the molecular gas mass as follows,
322: $$ L_{{\rm CO} (J=3-2)}^{\prime} =
323: {c^2 \over 2k} d_L^2 3 \sigma \Delta v \nu_{\rm rest}^{-2} (1+z)^{-1} \\
324: = 4.5 \times 10^{10}\ {\rm K\ km\ s}^{-1}\ {\rm pc}^2,$$
325: where, $c$ is the light speed, $k$ is the Boltzmann constant, $d_L$
326: is the luminosity distance, $\sigma$ is the rms noise (2.9 mJy
327: beam$^{-1}$) of the combined data at the velocity width of
328: $\Delta v$ (184 km s$^{-1}$),
329: $\nu_{\rm rest}$ is the rest frequency of the target line.
330: In order to estimate the molecular gas mass, the conversion factor from
331: $L_{\rm CO}^{\prime}$ to $M({\rm H}_2)$, $\alpha$, is necessary.
332: Although the value of $\alpha$ in this system is unknown, we adopt
333: $\alpha =0.8\ M_{\odot}$ (K km s$^{-1}$ pc$^2$)$^{-1}$ to compare
334: recent results of the CO observations of high redshift quasars
335: (Solomon \& Vanden Bout 2005).
336: Here we also assume that $L^{\prime}_{{\rm CO}(J=3-2)}$ is equal to
337: $L^{\prime}_{{\rm CO}(J=1-0)}$ .
338: The resulting upper limit on the molecular gas mass is
339: $3.6 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$.
340:
341: \begin{figure} \begin{center}
342: \FigureFile(170mm,80mm){f1.eps}
343: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
344: \end{center}
345: \caption{Integrated CO($J=3-2$) map toward SDSS J0839+3805
346: at observed frequency of 104.22 GHz with a 184 km s$^{-1}$ velocity width.
347: Contour levels are $-2$, $-1.5$, 1.5, 2, 2.5 $\sigma$ with
348: $1 \sigma = 3.6$ mJy beam$^{-1}$ in the C-configuration (left panel),
349: $1 \sigma = 5.0$ mJy beam$^{-1}$ in the D-configuration(middle panel),
350: and $1 \sigma = 2.9$ mJy beam$^{-1}$ in the C$+$D(right panel). Cross at the
351: center shows the position of the FeLoBAL quasar. Beamsize is shown in
352: the bottom-left corner of each panel.}\label{fig:sample}
353: \end{figure}
354:
355: The upper limit on the molecular gas mass of $3.6 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$
356: (or $L^{\prime}_{{\rm CO}(J=3-2)}$ of $4.5 \times 10^{10}$ K km s$^{-1}$
357: pc$^{2}$) should be confronted with the molecular gas masses
358: detected in quasars at $z=1-3$;
359: they are mostly derived from $L^{\prime}_{{\rm CO} (J=3-2)}$ and
360: range from $0.4 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ to
361: $7.4 \mu^{-1} \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$
362: (Solomon and Vanden Bout 2005, with the same
363: cosmology and the conversion factor), where $\mu$ refers to the
364: magnification factor of the gravitational lens.
365: The largest value comes from a very red quasar presumably obscured by
366: dust (MG0414+0534).
367: Among them, Cloverleaf (H1413+117) and VCV J1409+5628 are BAL quasars, and their molecular
368: gas masses are $3.2 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ (delensed with $\mu=11$)
369: and $6.3 \mu^{-1} \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$, respectively.
370: Therefore the FeLoBAL of SDSS J0839+3805 is not very molecular gas rich
371: as compared with quasars and BAL quasars at the similar redshifts.
372: This is true even if the emission-like feature mentioned above is
373: real.
374:
375: %Many of submillimeter galaxies at the similar redshift are also
376: %considered to host active galactic nucleus (e.g., Alexander et al.).
377: %Their molecular gas masses of the submillimeter galaxies at
378: %$z=1-3.5$ are $0.3 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$
379: %to $5.5 \mu^{-1} \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$
380: %(except for $13 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ in SMM J04135)
381: %(Solomon and Vanden Bout 2005).
382: %If the lensing magnification factor is $\sim 2$ or larger,
383: %our upper limit on the molecular gas mass is comparable to
384: %the detected molecular gas masses in submillimeter galaxies,
385: %and there is no positive evidence that the FeLoBAL of
386: %SDSS J0839+3805 is molecular gas rich.
387:
388: In conclusion, our target of FeLoBAL SDSS J0839+3805 with the Balmer
389: absorption line is turned out not to be very molecular gas rich among
390: quasars at the similar redshift, and it is the case even
391: if the emission-like feature is real.
392: However this is the first trial observation of a FeLoBAL quasar
393: in our knowledge, further observations in submillimeter
394: (Lewis et al. 2003; Willott et al. 2003; Priddey et al. 2006) and
395: CO line are necessary to examine the amount of molecular gases
396: and its relation to the line-of-sight absorption
397: in FeLoBAL quasars as well as BAL quasars.
398:
399: \vspace{1.0cm}
400: We thank the staff members of the Nobeyama Radio Observatory
401: for the help of the observations.
402: KO acknowledges the support by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
403: from Japan Society for Promotion of Science (17540216).
404:
405: %In the theory (\cite{key-1})..........
406:
407: %\subsection{Subsection}
408:
409: %In the theory (\cite{key-2})..........
410:
411: %\subsubsection{Subsubsection}
412:
413: %The resent result from ...........
414:
415:
416: %\newpage
417:
418: %\section{Section 4}
419:
420: %The final ..........
421:
422:
423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
424:
425: %\begin{table}
426: % \caption{This is the first tabular.}\label{tab:first}
427: % \begin{center}
428: % \begin{tabular}{llll}
429: % \hline
430: % a & b & c & d \\
431: % e & f & g & h \\
432: % ....\\
433: % \hline
434: % \end{tabular}
435: % \end{center}
436: %\end{table}
437:
438:
439: %\begin{longtable}{lll}
440: % \caption{Sample of ``longtable"}\label{tab:LTsample}
441: % \hline\hline
442: % name & value1 & value2 \\
443: %\endfirsthead
444: % \hline\hline
445: % name & value & value2 \\
446: %\endhead
447: % \hline
448: %\endfoot
449: % \hline
450: %\endlastfoot
451: % \hline
452: % aaaaa & bbbbb & ccccc \\
453: % ...... & ..... & ..... \\
454: % ...... & ..... & ..... \\
455: % ...... & ..... & ..... \\
456: % xxxxx & yyyyy & zzzzz \\
457: %\end{longtable}
458:
459: %\appendix
460: %\section{Method of .....}
461:
462: %\section{Approximation of ...}
463:
464: %\section*{Complete data}
465:
466:
467: %%%
468: % See the manual for the detail.
469: %%%
470: \begin{thebibliography}{}
471: % Journals(e.g. A\&A,ApJ,AJ,NMRAS,PASP ...)
472: % Authors, Year, Journal, Vol#, Page#
473: % Journal Title Abbreviation >> http://www.asj.or.jp/pasj/Jabb.html
474: %\bibitem[Author(2001a)]{key-1}
475: % Author, A. A., Author, B. B., Author, C. C.\ 2001, PASJ, vol, page
476: % Books
477: %\bibitem[Author(2001b)]{key-2}
478: % Author, A. A., Author, B. B.\ 2001, Name of Book(Publisher, Tokyo) ch0
479: % Books
480: %\bibitem[Author(2001c)]{key-3}
481: % Author, A. A., Author, B. B.\ 2001, Name of Book(Publisher, Tokyo) page0
482: %......
483: % Editorial Books
484: %\bibitem[Author(2001)]{key-n}
485: % Author A. A.\ 2001, in Name of Book,
486: % ed Editor D.\ Editor(Publisher, Tokyo) page0
487: %\bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....126.2081A} Abazajian, K., et
488: %al.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 2081
489: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2005)]{2005AJ....129.1755A} Abazajian, K., et
490: al.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 1755
491: \bibitem[Aoki et al. (2006)]{}
492: Aoki, K., Iwata, I., Ohta, K., Ando, M., Akiyama, M., \&
493: Tamura, N.\ 2006, \apj, 651, 84
494: \bibitem[Aoki et al. (2007)]{}
495: Aoki, K., Iwata, I., Ohta, K., Tamura, N., Ando, M., Akiyama, M.,
496: Kiuchi, G., \& Nakanishi, K. \ 2007, in
497: ASP Conf.~Ser.: The Central Engine of
498: Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. L. C. Ho, \&
499: J.-M. Wang (San Francisco: ASP), in
500: press (astro-ph/0612366)
501: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...479L..93B} Becker, R.~H., Gregg,
502: M.~D., Hook, I.~M., McMahon, R.~G., White, R.~L., \& Helfand, D.~J.\ 1997,
503: \apjl, 479, L93
504: \bibitem[Becker et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...538...72B} Becker, R.~H., White,
505: R.~L., Gregg, M.~D., Brotherton, M.~S., Laurent-Muehleisen, S.~A., \& Arav,
506: N.\ 2000, \apj, 538, 72
507: \bibitem[Boroson \& Meyers(1992)]{1992ApJ...397..442B} Boroson, T.~A., \&
508: Meyers, K.~A.\ 1992, \apj, 397, 442
509: \bibitem[Canalizo \& Stockton(2002)]{2002ASPC..255..195C} Canalizo, G., \&
510: Stockton, A.\ 2002, in ASP Conf.~Ser.~255: Mass Outflow in Active Galactic
511: Nuclei: New Perspectives, ed. D.M. Crenshaw, S. B. Kraemer, \&
512: I. M. George (San Francisco: ASP), 195
513: \bibitem[Carilli et al.(2002)]{2002AJ....123.1838C} Carilli, C.~L., et al.\
514: 2002, \aj, 123, 1838
515: \bibitem[Cowie et al.(1994)]{1994ApJ...432L..83C} Cowie, L.~L., et al.\
516: 1994, \apjl, 432, L83
517: \bibitem[Hall et al.(2002)]{2002ApJS..141..267H} Hall, P.~B., et al.\ 2002,
518: \apjs, 141, 267
519: \bibitem[Hall (2007)]{}Hall, P. B. 2007, \aj, in press (astro-ph/0611730)
520: \bibitem[Hazard et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...323..263H} Hazard, C., McMahon,
521: R.~G., Webb, J.~K., \& Morton, D.~C.\ 1987, \apj, 323, 263
522: \bibitem[Hewett \& Foltz(2003)]{2003AJ....125.1784H} Hewett, P.~C., \&
523: Foltz, C.~B.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 1784
524: \bibitem[Klamer et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...612L..97K} Klamer, I.~J., Ekers,
525: R.~D., Sadler, E.~M., \& Hunstead, R.~W.\ 2004, \apjl, 612, L97
526: \bibitem[Lewis et al. 2003]{} Lewis, G.~F., Chapman, S.~C., \& Kuncic,
527: Z.\ 2003, \apjl, 596, L35
528: \bibitem[Okumura et al.(2000)]{2000PASJ...52..393O} Okumura, S.~K., et al.\
529: 2000, \pasj, 52, 393
530: \bibitem[Pier et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....125.1559P} Pier, J.~R., Munn, J.~A.,
531: Hindsley, R.~B., Hennessy, G.~S., Kent, S.~M., Lupton, R.~H., \&
532: Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 1559
533: \bibitem[Priddey et al. 2006]{} Priddey, R.~S., Gallagher, S.~C., Isaak,
534: K.~G., Sharp, R.~G., McMahon, R.~G., \&
535: Butner, H.~M.\ 2006, \mnras, in press (astro-ph/0610472)
536: \bibitem[Reichard et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....126.2594R} Reichard, T.~A., et
537: al.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 2594
538: \bibitem[Schmidt \& Hines(1999)]{1999ApJ...512..125S} Schmidt, G.~D., \&
539: Hines, D.~C.\ 1999, \apj, 512, 125
540: \bibitem[Solomon \& Vanden Bout(2005)]{2005ARA&A..43..677S} Solomon, P.~M.,
541: \& Vanden Bout, P.~A.\ 2005, \araa, 43, 677
542: \bibitem[Trump et al. 2006]{}Trump, J.~R., et al.\ 2006, \apjs, 165, 1
543: \bibitem[Tsutsumi et al.(1997)]{1997ASPC..125...50T} Tsutsumi, T., Morita,
544: K.-I., \& Umeyama, S.\ 1997, in ASP Conf.~Ser.~125: Astronomical Data Analysis
545: Software and Systems VI, ed. G. Hunt, \& H. E. Payne (San Francisco:
546: ASP), 50
547: \bibitem[Weymann et al.(1991)]{1991ApJ...373...23W} Weymann, R.~J., Morris,
548: S.~L., Foltz, C.~B., \& Hewett, P.~C.\ 1991, \apj, 373, 23
549: \bibitem{Willott et al. 2003}{}Willott, C.~J., Rawlings, S., \& Grimes,
550: J.~A.\ 2003, \apj, 598, 909
551: \end{thebibliography}
552: \end{document}
553:
554: