astro-ph0702435/ms.tex
1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: 
3: \begin{document}
4: 
5: \shortauthors{Allen et al.}
6: \shorttitle{New Disks in Lupus}
7: 
8: \title{New Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs with Disks in Lupus\altaffilmark{1}}
9: 
10: \author{
11: P. R. Allen\altaffilmark{2},
12: K. L. Luhman\altaffilmark{2},
13: P. C. Myers\altaffilmark{3},
14: S. T. Megeath\altaffilmark{4}, 
15: L. E. Allen\altaffilmark{3},
16: L. Hartmann\altaffilmark{5},
17: and G. G. Fazio\altaffilmark{3}}
18: 
19: \altaffiltext{1}
20: {This work is based on observations made with the {\it Spitzer Space 
21: Telescope}, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California 
22: Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407.  Support for this work 
23: was provided by NASA through contract 1256790 issued by JPL/Caltech. 
24: Support for the IRAC instrument was provided by NASA through contract
25: 960541 issued by JPL.}
26:  
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania 
28: State University, University Park, PA 16802; pallen@astro.psu.edu.}
29: 
30: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., 
31: Cambridge, MA 02138.}
32: 
33: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Toledo, 
34: 2801 West Bancroft St., Toledo, OH 43606.}
35: 
36: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, The University of Michigan, 
37: 500 Church Street, 830 Dennison Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.}
38: 
39: \begin{abstract}
40: 
41: Using the Infrared Array Camera and the Multiband Imaging Photometer 
42: aboard the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, we have obtained images of
43: the Lupus~3 star-forming cloud at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24~\micron. 
44: We present photometry in these bands for the 41 previously known members
45: that are within our images. In addition, we have identified 19 possible
46: new members of the cloud based on red 3.6-8.0~\micron\ colors that are 
47: indicative of circumstellar disks. We have performed optical spectroscopy
48: on 6 of these candidates, all of which are confirmed as young low-mass
49: members of Lupus~3. The spectral types of these new members range from
50: M4.75 to M8, corresponding to masses of 0.2-0.03~$M_\odot$ for ages of 
51: $\sim1$~Myr according to theoretical evolutionary models. 
52: We also present optical spectroscopy 
53: of a candidate disk-bearing object in the vicinity of the Lupus~1
54: cloud, 2M~1541-3345, which Jayawardhana \& Ivanov recently classified as
55: a young brown dwarf ($M\sim0.03$~$M_\odot$) with a spectral type of M8.
56: In contrast to their results, we measure an earlier spectral type of 
57: M5.75$\pm$0.25 for this object, indicating that it is probably a low-mass star 
58: ($M\sim0.1$~$M_\odot$).  In fact, according to its gravity-sensitive absorption
59: lines and its luminosity, 2M~1541-3345 is 
60: older than members of the Lupus clouds ($\tau\sim1$~Myr) and instead is 
61: probably a more evolved pre-main-sequence star that is not directly related
62: to the current generation of star formation in Lupus.
63: 
64: \end{abstract}
65: 
66: \keywords{accretion disks -- planetary systems: protoplanetary disks -- stars:
67: formation --- stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: pre-main sequence}
68: 
69: \section{Introduction}
70: \label{sec:intro}
71: 
72: 
73: Young embedded clusters are the primary laboratories for studies of the 
74: formation of stars and brown dwarfs.
75: The dark clouds in the constellation of Lupus are potentially attractive sites
76: for such studies because of their proximity to the Sun 
77: \citep[$d=140$-200~pc,][]{com06}.
78: Molecular and extinction maps have shown that the clouds extend across
79: $\sim20\arcdeg$ of the sky \citep{cam99,tac01} and
80: the richest cloud in the complex in terms of ongoing star formation
81: is Lupus~3. It has a fairly high surface density of young stars, 
82: with a peak value of $\sim200$~stars~pc$^{-2}$.
83: The stellar population within Lupus~3 is a good example of a
84: nearby, well-defined small system embedded in a filamentary dark cloud
85: \citep{naka03,tei05,tac06}.
86: 
87: 
88: 
89: Recent efforts have been made at extending the
90: census of the stellar population in Lupus~3 to
91: low-mass stars and brown dwarfs \citep{com03,lm05}.
92: Like their more massive counterparts, low-mass disk-bearing members
93: of embedded clusters can be 
94: identified by the presence of mid-infrared (IR) emission above 
95: that expected from a photosphere alone \citep{com98}. 
96: However, conducting a wide-field mid-IR survey for faint,
97: low-mass objects is technologically challenging.
98: For instance, the {\it Infrared Astronomical Satellite} 
99: was capable of mapping large fields, but it lacked the sensitivity for 
100: reliably reaching substellar members of nearby star-forming regions. 
101: With its combination of wide field of view and excellent 
102: sensitivity, the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} \citep{wer04} has 
103: made it possible to search for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in 
104: young embedded clusters like Lupus based on the presence of circumstellar 
105: disks \citep{all04,meg04}. 
106: 
107: 
108: In this paper, we present the results of a search for low-mass disk-bearing
109: members of the most heavily populated cloud in the Lupus complex, Lupus~3,
110: using {\it Spitzer}'s Infrared Array Camera \citep[IRAC;][]{faz04} 
111: and the Multiband Imaging Photometer for {\it Spitzer} \citep[MIPS;][]{rie04}.
112: We begin by describing the mid-IR images of Lupus~3 obtained with these 
113: instruments (\S~\ref{sec:obs}) and the identification of candidate 
114: low-mass disk-bearing objects with these data (\S~\ref{sec:cand}). 
115: We then use optical spectroscopy to measure spectral types for a sample of
116: these candidates and to determine if they are young members of Lupus 
117: (\S~\ref{sec:spec}).  
118: In addition to the Lupus~3 targets, we include in our spectroscopic sample a 
119: candidate brown dwarf near Lupus~1 from \citet{all06}. 
120: We conclude by summarizing the properties of the new low-mass stars
121: and brown dwarfs found in this work (\S~\ref{sec:disc}).
122: 
123: \section{Infrared Images}
124: \label{sec:obs}
125: 
126: \subsection{Observations}
127: 
128: As a part of the Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) of the IRAC instrument 
129: team, we obtained images of the Lupus 3 cloud at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 
130: 8.0~\micron\ with IRAC and at 24~\micron\ with MIPS on the {\it Spitzer Space 
131: Telescope}.  
132: The IRAC observations were performed on 2004 March 7 (UT) and
133: consisted of a mosaic of $6\times7$ pointings, with each pointing 
134: separated by $298\arcsec$ and aligned with the array axes.  
135: The mosaic was centered on
136: $\alpha=16^{\rm h}08^{\rm m}56^{\rm s}$, $\delta=-39\arcdeg08\arcmin33\arcsec$
137: (J2000).
138: Images were obtained in the high dynamic range (HDR) mode, which
139: consisted of one 0.4~s exposure and one 10.4~s exposure.
140: This mosaic was observed twice consecutively. 
141: The MIPS observations were performed on 2004 February 23 (UT) 
142: and were centered on the same position as the IRAC mosaic.
143: We operated MIPS in the scan mode with the medium scan rate and individual
144: exposure times of 3.67~s. We performed six scans, each with a length of 
145: $55\arcmin$.
146: 
147: We also make use of an IRAC map that was obtained by the Cores 2 Disks (c2d) 
148: Spitzer Legacy Team \citep{c2d} on 2004 September 4 (UT), which has the 
149: same location and dimensions as the GTO mosaic.
150: Because the dates of these two maps are separated by six months, 
151: the roll angle of the telescope differed by 180$^{\circ}$ between them. 
152: As a result, the combination of the two maps provides full coverage
153: in all four IRAC bands for the area imaged. 
154: Unlike the GTO mosaic, the c2d data were not taken in HDR mode. 
155: Instead, they consisted of two 10.4~s exposures at each pointing in a 
156: map that was performed once. 
157: 
158: \subsection{Data Reduction}
159: 
160: The IRAC data were processed with the Spitzer Science Center 
161: (SSC) S13.2.0 pipeline, the MOPEX software from the SSC, and the IRACproc 
162: software \citep{iracproc}. 
163: For each of the four IRAC bands, we produced one 
164: $40\arcmin\times28\arcmin$ mosaic consisting of a combination of the GTO and 
165: c2d data at 10.4~s and one $35\arcmin\times28\arcmin$ mosaic consisting of the 
166: GTO 0.4~s data. 
167: The MIPS data at 24~\micron\ were reduced with MOPEX. The resulting mosaic
168: had dimensions of $55\arcmin\times30\farcm5$ and a total exposure time 
169: of 50~s at a given position.
170: A false-color image composed of the mosaics at 3.6, 8.0, and 24~\micron\ is 
171: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:image}.
172: 
173: 
174: We used standard IRAF photometry routines in the {\it apphot} package to 
175: identify all point sources in the IRAC and MIPS mosaics and to measure 
176: photometry for them.
177: For the IRAC data, we adopted zero point magnitudes ($ZP$) of 19.670, 
178: 18.921, 16.855, 17.394 in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0~\micron\ bands, where 
179: $M=-2.5 \log (DN/sec) + ZP$ \citep{rea05}.  For most IRAC sources, 
180: we measured photometry using
181: a radius of 4 pixels for the aperture and inner and outer radii of 
182: 4 and 5 pixels, respectively, for the sky annulus. We used a smaller
183: aperture radius of 2.5 pixels for Sz~108~A and B.  The plate scale of
184: the reduced IRAC mosaics was $0\farcs86$~pixel$^{-1}$.
185: To adjust these measurements to the apertures used by \citet{rea05}, we 
186: applied aperture corrections of 0.18, 0.16, 0.22, and 0.48~mag for
187: 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8~$\mu$m, respectively, which we measured from bright
188: stars in these data.
189: For MIPS sources, we measured photometry with a radius of 3 pixels for
190: the aperture and inner and outer radii of 3 and 4 pixels, respectively, 
191: for the sky annulus. The plate scale of the reduced MIPS mosaic was 
192: $2\farcs45$~pixel$^{-1}$.
193: For the MIPS 24~\micron\ data we applied a flux calibration of
194: 0.0067~mJy~(DN/sec)$^{-1}$ and an aperture correction of 0.6~mag, which 
195: were provided by the MIPS GTO team (David Trilling, private communication).
196: 
197: 
198: 
199: \section{Selection of Candidate Members of Lupus}
200: \label{sec:cand}
201: 
202: 
203: 
204: 
205: 
206: We can identify possible new disk-bearing members of Lupus~3 by examining
207: the colors of sources detected in the IRAC and MIPS images
208: \citep{all04,meg04,har05b,luh06tau}. To do this, we first consider the colors 
209: of previously known members of Lupus~3. 
210: From \citet{com03}, \citet{com06}, and \citet{kra97}, we have compiled
211: a list of 41 previously known members. Our IRAC and MIPS measurements
212: for these objects are given in Table~\ref{tab:old}. 
213: In a diagram of [3.6]-[4.5] versus [5.8]-[8.0] in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}, 
214: we plot the 35 previously known members that are not saturated and that have 
215: photometric uncertainties less than 0.1~mag in all of the IRAC bands.
216: The IRAC colors of the known members exhibit either neutral colors consistent
217: with a stellar photosphere or significantly redder colors that indicate
218: the presence of a circumstellar disk, which is the same behavior that has been
219: observed in IRAC data for young stars in other star-forming regions 
220: like Taurus \citep{har05b}.
221: As in the survey for new members of Taurus by 
222: \citet{luh06tau}, we adopt color criteria of 
223: $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$ and $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$ for selecting candidate objects
224: with disks in Lupus~3. We use these criteria because they encompass nearly 
225: all class~I and II members of Taurus \citep{har05b}. 
226: We applied these criteria to the $\sim1300$ 
227: sources with photometric errors less than 0.1~mag in all four IRAC bands, 
228: which are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}.
229: This process produced 19 candidates. Most of these candidates are fainter
230: than the previously known members of Lupus~3, as illustrated in 
231: the diagram of [3.6] versus $[3.6]-[8.0]$ in Figure~\ref{fig:cmd}.
232: Six candidates are classified spectroscopically in \S~\ref{sec:spec}.
233: The IRAC and MIPS data for the 6 spectroscopic targets and the remaining
234: 13 candidates that lack spectroscopy are listed in Tables~\ref{tab:new}
235: and \ref{tab:cand}, respectively. 
236: Five of the 19 candidates were also identified as possible members
237: by \citet{lm05} through optical and near-IR photometry and 7 of the
238: candidates were detected in X-rays by \citet{gon06}, as noted in 
239: Tables~\ref{tab:new} and \ref{tab:cand}.
240: 
241: 
242: 
243: 
244: 
245: 
246: 
247: 
248: 
249: 
250: 
251: \section{Infrared Spectroscopy of Candidates}
252: \label{sec:spec}
253: 
254: \subsection{Observations}
255: 
256: We performed optical spectroscopy on 6 of the 19 candidate members of 
257: Lupus~3 that were identified in the previous section using the Low Dispersion 
258: Survey Spectrograph (LDSS-3) on the Magellan~II Telescope during the nights
259: of 2006 February 9 and 11.
260: We observed 2MASS~16081497-3857145, 16085953-3856275, and 16073773-3921388 
261: during the first night and 2MASS~16080017-3902595, 16083733-3923109, and
262: 16085373-3914367 during the second night. On the first night, we also observed
263: an additional target, source 18 from \citet{all06}, which is also known
264: as 2MASS~J15414081-3345188 (hereafter 2M~1541-3345). This object was
265: identified as a candidate low-mass disk-bearing member of Lupus~1 in a similar
266: manner as our candidates \citep{all06}. The procedures for the collection and 
267: reduction of the optical spectra were similar to those described by 
268: \citet{luh04tau}. The spectra obtained on the first and second nights
269: exhibit wavelength coverages of 0.68-1.1 and 0.58-1~\micron\ and 
270: resolutions of 6 and 4~\AA, respectively.
271: The spectra of the six candidates in Lupus~3 are shown 
272: in Figure~\ref{fig:spec1} and the spectrum of 2M~1541-3345 is shown in
273: Figs.~\ref{fig:spec2} and \ref{fig:spec3}.
274: 
275: 
276: 
277: \subsection{Spectral Classification}
278: \label{sec:class}
279: 
280: To assess the membership of the candidate members of Lupus in our spectroscopic
281: sample and to measure their spectral types, we applied the optical 
282: classification methods developed in our previous studies of star-forming
283: regions \citep{luh99,luh03}. 
284: The membership diagnostics included emission lines, IR excess emission, 
285: gravity-sensitive spectral features (Na~I, K~I, FeH), and reddening.
286: We also examined the Li absorption line at 6707~\AA\ for the one spectrum that 
287: exhibited sufficient signal-to-noise at this wavelength.
288: Based on these diagnostics, we find that all of the candidates in our 
289: spectroscopic sample are members of the Lupus~3 cloud.  The evidence of 
290: membership for each object is summarized in Table~\ref{tab:new}. 
291: For these young objects, 
292: spectral types were measured through comparison to the averages of spectra 
293: for standard dwarfs and giants, which is the method that has been employed
294: for most previous optical spectral types of low-mass members of star
295: forming regions \citep{luh99}. 
296: During this process, reddening is applied to the dwarf/giant
297: spectrum at each spectral type to optimize the match to the target spectrum.
298: Thus, both spectral types and extinctions were produced. These reddening
299: estimates were fine-tuned by comparing each spectrum to previously known
300: young objects with negligible extinction \citep{luh04cha}.
301: The resulting spectral types for the 6 new
302: members are listed in Table~\ref{tab:new}. 
303: The extinctions are indicated in Figure~\ref{fig:spec1}, where they
304: are quantified by the color excess between 0.6 and 0.9~\micron\ ($E(0.6-0.9)$), 
305: as done by \citet{luh04cha}.  The positions of these new
306: members and the previously known members of Lupus~3 are indicated in 
307: Figure~\ref{fig:image}. 
308: 
309: As with the Lupus~3 candidates, we classified the spectrum of 2M~1541-3345
310: through comparison to the averages of spectra of dwarfs and giants,
311: arriving at a spectral type of M5.75$\pm$0.25 and an extinction of 
312: $A_V=0$ with an upper limit of $A_V<0.5$. Through analysis of its spectral 
313: energy distribution, \citet{all06} also estimated $A_V\sim0$ for 2M~1541-3345. 
314: The close agreement between its spectrum and the unreddened average of a 
315: dwarf and giant at M5.75 is demonstrated in Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}. 
316: In comparison, \citet{jay06} reported a spectral type of
317: M8 for 2M~1541-3345, but the average of M8V and M8III is a poor match to
318: its spectrum, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}. 
319: Even if we classify our spectrum with dwarf standards as done by 
320: \citet{jay06} rather than averages of dwarfs and giants, we still arrive at
321: a spectral type of M5.75.  As with the dwarf/giant average, M8V 
322: is a poor match to the spectrum of 2M~1541-3345. To determine if 2M~1541-3345
323: is a member of the current generation of star formation in Lupus, we examined
324: the gravity-sensitive lines appearing in its spectrum, namely K~I,
325: Na~I, and FeH. We compared the strengths of these lines between 2M~1541-3345
326: and one of the new Lupus~3 members, 2MASS~J16073773-3921388 
327: (hereafter 2M~1607-3921). These two objects have the same spectral 
328: type, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}, and were observed on the same night.
329: In Figure~\ref{fig:spec3}, we compare the K~I, Na~I,
330: and FeH for these two objects. These lines are significantly stronger in
331: 2M~1541-3345 than in 2M~1607-3921, indicating that the former has a higher
332: surface gravity and hence greater age. Thus, we conclude that 2M~1541-3345
333: is not a member of the latest generation of $\sim1$~Myr-old stars that 
334: are arising from the Lupus clouds. Instead, 2M~1541-3345 is an older object,
335: possibly a member of one of the older populations in 
336: the Sco-Cen complex \citep{pm06}.
337: 
338: \section{Discussion}
339: \label{sec:disc}
340: 
341: 
342: We have presented images of the Lupus~3 star-forming cloud at
343: 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24~\micron\ obtained with IRAC and MIPS aboard
344: the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. After measuring photometry for all
345: point sources detected in these data, we searched the data for
346: new disk-bearing members of the cloud through red colors at 3.6-8.0~\micron. 
347: Among the 19 candidates identified in this way, 17 objects
348: exhibit excess emission at 24~\micron\ as well. 
349: Through optical spectroscopy of six of the candidates, we have confirmed 
350: that they are members of Lupus~3 and have measured spectral types 
351: of M4.75 to M8. These types correspond to masses of 0.2-0.03~$M_\odot$ 
352: according to theoretical evolutionary models \citep{bar98,cha00} and 
353: a compatible temperature scale \citep{luh03}. Two of the new members,
354: 2MASS~J16083733-3923109 and J16085953-3856275, are likely to be substellar.
355: We note that the candidate 2MASS~J16085324-3914401 and the new member
356: 2MASS~J16085373-3914367 are separated by only $6\arcsec$, and thus could 
357: comprise a wide binary system if the former is indeed a cluster member. 
358: Similarly, the candidate 2MASS~J16095628-3859518 
359: has a separation of only $10\arcsec$ from the known member HBC~627.
360: Most of the remaining 13 candidates that lack spectroscopy
361: have IRAC magnitudes that are indicative of low-mass
362: stars and brown dwarfs, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:cmd}.  
363: The candidates with the reddest 
364: IRAC colors ($[3.6]-[4.5]>0.5$, $[5.8]-[8.0]>1$) are probably 
365: class~I brown dwarfs or galaxies.  Because of their youth and proximity, 
366: the new members that we have found and the remaining candidates (if confirmed)
367: are attractive targets for detailed studies of circumstellar disks and 
368: multiplicity near and below the hydrogen burning limit 
369: \citep{bur06ppv,luh06ppv}.
370: 
371: In addition to the candidates toward Lupus~3, we have performed spectral
372: classification on 2M~1541-3345, which is a possible disk-bearing object
373: that was identified in the vicinity of Lupus~1 by \citet{all06}. 
374: According to the same evolutionary models applied to the Lupus~3 members,
375: the spectral type of M5.75$\pm$0.25 that we have measured for this object 
376: implies a mass of $\sim0.1$~$M_{\odot}$. In comparison, \citet{jay06}
377: reported a significantly later spectral type of M8 for 2M~1541-3345 and 
378: thus derived a much lower mass ($M\sim0.03$~$M_{\odot}$).  In addition,
379: rather than being a member of Lupus~1 as assumed by \citet{jay06}, 
380: the gravity-sensitive lines in the spectrum of 2M~1541-3345 indicate
381: that it is older than members of the current generation of star formation
382: in Lupus~3 ($\tau\sim1$~Myr), and thus probably is not a member of the
383: stellar population forming in the Lupus~1 cloud. This conclusion is supported
384: by the fact that 2M~1541-3345 is much too faint to be a member of Lupus~1
385: given its spectral type of M5.75. For instance, the combination of this
386: spectral type and the luminosity of 2M~1541-3345 from \citet{all06}, 
387: which assumes the distance of Lupus~1, implies an age of 30-100~Myr 
388: according to the evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}. This age range is 
389: inconsistent with the ages of $\sim1$~Myr that are typical of star-forming 
390: clouds like Lupus~1. Thus, 2M~1541-3345 is probably similar to St34, which 
391: is an evolved disk-bearing pre-main-sequence star that happens to be projected 
392: against a much younger star-forming region \citep{wh05,har05a}.
393: 
394: 
395: 
396: 
397: 
398: \acknowledgements
399: P. A. and K. L. were supported by grant NAG5-11627 from the NASA Long-Term 
400: Space Astrophysics program. This work is based in part on the IRAC post-BCD 
401: processing software "IRACproc" developed by Mike Schuster, Massimo Marengo and 
402: Brian Patten at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.  
403: This work is based on observations made with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, 
404: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California
405: Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407. Support for the IRAC 
406: instrument was provided by NASA through contract 960541 issued by JPL.
407: 
408: \begin{thebibliography}{}
409: 
410: 
411: 
412: 
413: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{all04}
414: Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
415: 
416: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2006)]{all06}
417: Allers, K. N., Kessler-Silacci, J. E., Cieza, L. A., \& Jaffe, D. T. 2006,
418: \apj, 644, 364
419: 
420: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98} 
421: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
422: 
423: 
424: 
425: 
426: 
427: 
428: 
429: 
430: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2006)]{bur06ppv}
431: Burgasser, A. J., Reid, I. N., Siegler, N., Close, L., Allen, P., Lowrance, P.,
432: Gizis, J. 2006, Protostars and Planets V, in press
433: 
434: 
435: 
436: 
437: 
438: \bibitem[Cambr\'esy et al.(1999)]{cam99}
439: Cambr\'esy, L. 1999, \aap, 345, 965
440: 
441: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{cha00} 
442: Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I. Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2000, \apj, 542, 464
443: 
444: 
445: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n (2006)]{com06}
446: Comer\'{o}n, F.\ 2006, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, ASP Conference Series, 
447: submitted
448: 
449: 
450: \bibitem[Comer{\'o}n et al.(2003)]{com03} 
451: Comer{\'o}n, F., Fern{\'a}ndez, M., Baraffe, I., Neuh{\"a}user, R., \& Kaas, 
452: A. A. 2003, \aap, 406, 1001 
453: 
454: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(1998)]{com98} 
455: Comer\'{o}n, F., Rieke, G. H., Claes, P., Torra, J., \& Laureijs, R. J.\ 1998, 
456: \aap, 335, 522
457: 
458: 
459: 
460: 
461: 
462: 
463: 
464: \bibitem[Evans et al.(2003)]{c2d} 
465: Evans, N.~J., II, et al.\  2003, \pasp, 115, 965
466: 
467: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04} 
468: Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
469: 
470: 
471: 
472: 
473: \bibitem[Gondoin(2006)]{gon06}
474: Gondoin, P. 2006, \aap, 454, 595
475: 
476: 
477: 
478: 
479: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005a)]{har05a}
480: Hartmann, L., et al. 2005a, \apj, 628, L147
481: 
482: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005b)]{har05b} 
483: Hartmann, L., et al. 2005b, \apj, 629, 881
484: 
485: 
486: 
487: 
488: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2005)]{ind05}
489: Indebetouw, R., et al. 2005, \apj, 619, 9311
490: 
491: \bibitem[Jayawardhana \& Ivanov(2006)]{jay06}
492: Jayawardhana, R., \& Ivanov, V. D. 2006, \apj, 647, L167
493: 
494: 
495: 
496: \bibitem[Krautter et al.(1997)]{kra97}
497: Krautter, J., Wichmann, R., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Alcal\'a, J. M., 
498: Neuh\"{a}user, R., \& Terranegra, L. 1997, \aaps, 123, 329
499: 
500: 
501: 
502: 
503: \bibitem[L\'opez Mart{\'\i} et al.(2005)]{lm05} 
504: L\'opez Mart{\'\i}, B., Eisl\"{o}ffel, J., \& Mundt, R. 2005, \aap, 440, 139
505: 
506: \bibitem[Luhman(1999)]{luh99} 
507: Luhman, K. L. 1999, \apj, 525, 466
508: 
509: \bibitem[Luhman(2004a)]{luh04cha}
510: Luhman, K. L. 2004a, \apj, 602, 816
511: 
512: \bibitem[Luhman(2004b)]{luh04tau} 
513: Luhman, K. L. 2004b, \apj, 617, 1216
514: 
515: 
516: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2006a)]{luh06ppv}
517: Luhman, K. L., Joergens, V., Lada, C., Muzerolle, J., Pascucci, I., \& White, R.
518: 2006a, Protostars and Planets V, in press
519: 
520: 
521: 
522: 
523: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luh03} 
524: Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, J. R., Muench, A. A., Rieke, G. H., Lada, E. A., 
525: Bouvier, J., \& Lada, C. J. 2003, \apj, 593, 1093
526: 
527: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2006b)]{luh06tau} 
528: Luhman, K. L., Whitney, B. A., Meade, M. R., Babler, B. L., Indebetouw, R.,
529: Bracker, S., \& Churchwell, E. B. 2006b, \apj, 647, 1180
530: 
531: 
532: 
533: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{meg04}
534: Megeath, S. T., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 367
535: 
536: 
537: 
538: 
539: 
540: 
541: 
542: 
543: \bibitem[Nakajima et al.(2003)]{naka03} 
544: Nakajima, Y., et al.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 1407 
545: 
546: 
547: 
548: 
549: 
550: 
551: 
552: 
553: 
554: 
555: \bibitem[Preibisch \& Mamajek(2006)]{pm06}
556: Preibisch, T., \& Mamajek, E. 2006, Handbook of Star Forming Regions,
557: ASP Conference Series, submitted
558: 
559: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{rea05} 
560: Reach, W. T., et al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
561: 
562: 
563: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rie04} 
564: Rieke, G.~H.\ et~al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
565: 
566: 
567: \bibitem[Schuster, Marengo, \& Patten(2006)]{iracproc} 
568: Schuster, M.~T., Marengo M., \& Patten B. M., 2006, Proceedings of the SPIE, 
569: 6270-74
570: 
571: 
572: \bibitem[Tachihara et al.(2001)]{tac01}
573: Tachihara, K., Toyoda, S., Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., Fukui, Y., 
574: \& Neuh\"{a}user, R. 2001, \pasj, 53, 1081
575: 
576: \bibitem[Tachihara et al.(2006)]{tac06}
577: Tachihara, K., et al. 2006, Protostars and Planets V, in press
578: 
579: \bibitem[Teixeira et al.(2005)]{tei05}
580: Teixeira, P. S., Lada, C. J., \& Alves, J. F. 2005, \apj, 629, 276
581: 
582: 
583: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{wer04}
584: Werner, M. W., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
585: 
586: \bibitem[White \& Hillenbrand(2005)]{wh05}
587: White, R. J., \& Hillenbrand, L. A. 2005, \apj, 621, L65
588: 
589: 
590: 
591: 
592: 
593: \end{thebibliography}
594: \clearpage
595: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllll}
596: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
597: \tablewidth{0pt}
598: \tablecaption{Previously Known Members of Lupus~3\label{tab:old}}
599: \tablehead{
600: \colhead{2MASS\tablenotemark{a}} &
601: \colhead{Other Name} &
602: \colhead{$J-H$\tablenotemark{a}} & 
603: \colhead{$H-K_s$\tablenotemark{a}} & 
604: \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{a}} &
605: \colhead{[3.6]} &
606: \colhead{[4.5]} &
607: \colhead{[5.8]} &
608: \colhead{[8.0]} &
609: \colhead{[24]}
610: }
611: \startdata
612:    J16074959-3904287 &  Lupus 3 28 &    0.64 &    0.25 &    10.56 & 10.35$\pm$0.03 & 10.27$\pm$0.03 & 10.25$\pm$0.03 & 10.26$\pm$0.03 &         \nodata \\
613:    J16075230-3858059 &    Sz 95   &    0.73 &    0.27 &    10.01 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  9.38$\pm$0.03 &  9.13$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  6.12$\pm$0.04 \\
614:    J16075996-3857510 &  TTS 106  &    0.69 &    0.25 &     8.70 &  8.59$\pm$0.03 &  8.55$\pm$0.03 &  8.57$\pm$0.03 &  8.57$\pm$0.04 &  8.49$\pm$0.09 \\
615:    J16081096-3910459 &  F304   &    0.62 &    0.15 &     9.61 &  9.50$\pm$0.03 &  9.49$\pm$0.03 &  9.47$\pm$0.03 &  9.48$\pm$0.04 &  9.27$\pm$0.11 \\
616:    J16081263-3908334 &  HBC 615   &    0.78 &    0.39 &     8.96 &  7.69$\pm$0.03 &  7.25$\pm$0.03 &  6.97$\pm$0.03 &  6.38$\pm$0.03 &  4.21$\pm$0.03 \\
617:    J16081603-3903042 &  Par-Lup3-1   &    0.77 &    0.49 &    11.26 & 10.76$\pm$0.03 & 10.60$\pm$0.03 & 10.58$\pm$0.03 & 10.70$\pm$0.04 &         \nodata \\
618:    J16082180-3904214 &    Sz 97   &    0.69 &    0.34 &    10.22 &  9.84$\pm$0.03 &  9.59$\pm$0.03 &  9.25$\pm$0.03 &  8.67$\pm$0.04 &  5.86$\pm$0.04 \\
619:    J16082249-3904464 &   HK Lup   &    0.88 &    0.64 &     8.01 &  6.97$\pm$0.03 &  6.43$\pm$0.03 &  5.96$\pm$0.03 &  5.04$\pm$0.04 &  2.20$\pm$0.03 \\
620:    J16082279-3900591 &  RXJ1608.4-3900B  &    0.74 &    0.26 &    10.03 &  9.71$\pm$0.03 &  9.45$\pm$0.03 &  9.15$\pm$0.03 &  8.55$\pm$0.04 &  7.02$\pm$0.04 \\
621:    J16082404-3905494 &    Sz 99   &    0.72 &    0.47 &    10.74 & 10.07$\pm$0.03 &  9.71$\pm$0.03 &  9.45$\pm$0.03 &  8.94$\pm$0.03 &  6.18$\pm$0.04 \\
622:    J16082576-3906011 &   Sz 100   &    0.63 &    0.45 &     9.91 &  9.28$\pm$0.03 &  8.88$\pm$0.03 &  8.56$\pm$0.04 &  7.68$\pm$0.04 &  4.59$\pm$0.03 \\
623:    J16082778-3900406 & V1093 Sco   &    0.74 &    0.25 &     9.80 &  9.61$\pm$0.03 &  9.58$\pm$0.03 &  9.56$\pm$0.03 &  9.55$\pm$0.03 &  9.65$\pm$0.23 \\
624:    J16082843-3905324 &   Sz 101   &    0.68 &    0.33 &     9.39 &  8.95$\pm$0.03 &  8.79$\pm$0.03 &  8.66$\pm$0.03 &  8.35$\pm$0.04 &  6.34$\pm$0.07 \\
625:    J16082972-3903110 & Krautter's Star   &    0.90 &    1.07 &    12.58 & 10.62$\pm$0.03 &  9.64$\pm$0.03 &  8.81$\pm$0.03 &  7.48$\pm$0.04 &  3.29$\pm$0.03 \\
626:    J16083026-3906111 &  HBC 618   &    0.76 &    0.39 &    10.23 &  9.72$\pm$0.03 &  9.42$\pm$0.03 &  9.02$\pm$0.04 &  8.48$\pm$0.04 &  4.97$\pm$0.04 \\
627:    J16083081-3905488 &   Sz 104   &    0.67 &    0.35 &    10.65 & 10.05$\pm$0.03 &  9.73$\pm$0.03 &  9.45$\pm$0.03 &  8.80$\pm$0.03 &  5.30$\pm$0.05 \\
628:    J16083156-3847292 &  Lupus 3 38 &    0.75 &    0.30 &     8.62 &  8.33$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  8.04$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  6.17$\pm$0.04 \\
629:    J16083456-3905342 & V1027 Sco   &   -0.04 &    0.04 &     6.67 &  6.69$\pm$0.03 &  6.69$\pm$0.03 &  6.71$\pm$0.03 &  6.76$\pm$0.04 &  5.87$\pm$0.10 \\
630:    J16083578-3903479 &  Par-Lup3-2   &    0.51 &    0.39 &    10.34 & 10.03$\pm$0.03 &  9.95$\pm$0.03 &  9.89$\pm$0.03 &  9.93$\pm$0.04 &         \nodata \\
631:    J16083617-3923024 & V1094 Sco   &    0.84 &    0.38 &     8.66 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &        7.06$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &      6.30$\pm$0.04 &  4.19$\pm$0.03 \\
632:    J16083976-3906253 &   Sz 106   &    0.99 &    0.51 &    10.15 &  9.10$\pm$0.03 &  8.55$\pm$0.03 &  8.17$\pm$0.04 &  7.54$\pm$0.04 &  5.56$\pm$0.04 \\
633:    J16084179-3901370 &  Lupus 3 44 &    0.62 &    0.31 &    10.31 &  9.98$\pm$0.03 &  9.86$\pm$0.03 &  9.83$\pm$0.03 &  9.81$\pm$0.03 &  7.25$\pm$0.05 \\
634:    J16084273-3906183 &  Sz 108A   &    0.75 &    0.20 &     8.84 &  8.66$\pm$0.03 &  8.63$\pm$0.03 &  8.63$\pm$0.05 &  8.54$\pm$0.04 &         \nodata \\
635:    J16084273-3906183 &  Sz 108B   &    0.75 &    0.20 &     8.84 &  9.79$\pm$0.03 &  9.53$\pm$0.04 &  9.25$\pm$0.06 &  8.65$\pm$0.04 &  5.56$\pm$0.05 \\
636:    J16084816-3904192 &   Sz 109   &    0.58 &    0.32 &    10.50 & 10.12$\pm$0.03 &  9.99$\pm$0.03 &  9.97$\pm$0.03 &  9.93$\pm$0.04 &         \nodata \\
637:    J16084940-3905393 &  Par-Lup3-3   &    1.28 &    0.62 &     9.54 &  8.99$\pm$0.03 &  8.55$\pm$0.03 &  8.02$\pm$0.03 &  6.99$\pm$0.04 &  4.11$\pm$0.03 \\
638:    J16085143-3905304 &  Par-Lup3-4   &    1.20 &    0.96 &    13.30 & 12.54$\pm$0.03 & 11.99$\pm$0.03 & 11.88$\pm$0.04 & 11.65$\pm$0.06 &  6.23$\pm$0.07 \\
639:    J16085157-3903177 &   Sz 110   &    0.75 &    0.47 &     9.75 &  8.86$\pm$0.03 &  8.50$\pm$0.03 &  8.20$\pm$0.04 &  7.53$\pm$0.03 &  4.26$\pm$0.03 \\
640:    J16085427-3906057 & TYC 7851-426-1  &    0.53 &    0.16 &     8.21 &  8.17$\pm$0.03 &  8.19$\pm$0.03 &  8.21$\pm$0.03 &  8.18$\pm$0.04 &  7.42$\pm$0.10 \\
641:    J16085553-3902339 &   Sz 112   &    0.72 &    0.32 &     9.96 &  9.34$\pm$0.03 &  9.05$\pm$0.03 &  8.95$\pm$0.03 &  8.63$\pm$0.03 &  4.63$\pm$0.03 \\
642:    J16085780-3902227 &   Sz 113, Lup 609s  &    0.74 &    0.47 &    11.26 & 10.57$\pm$0.03 & 10.17$\pm$0.03 &  9.76$\pm$0.03 &  8.89$\pm$0.03 &  5.39$\pm$0.03 \\
643:    J16090185-3905124 & V908 Sco   &    0.72 &    0.38 &     9.32 &  8.48$\pm$0.03 &  7.98$\pm$0.03 &  7.59$\pm$0.03 &  6.85$\pm$0.03 &  3.44$\pm$0.03 \\
644:    J16090621-3908518 &   Sz 115   &    0.68 &    0.20 &    10.45 & 10.08$\pm$0.03 &  9.92$\pm$0.03 &  9.72$\pm$0.03 &  9.42$\pm$0.04 &  7.21$\pm$0.05 \\
645:    J16092320-3855547 & RXJ1609.4-3855   &    0.75 &    0.27 &     9.22 &  8.59$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  8.92$\pm$0.03 &  8.95$\pm$0.04 &  8.38$\pm$0.10 \\
646:    J16092739-3850186 & RXJ1609.5-3850   &    0.63 &    0.26 &     8.57 &  8.36$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  8.37$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  8.21$\pm$0.07 \\
647:    J16093953-3855070 & V1095 Sco   &    0.62 &    0.21 &     8.00 &  7.91$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  8.42$\pm$0.03 &\nodata\tablenotemark{b} &  7.85$\pm$0.06 \\
648:    J16094258-3919407 &  HBC 625   &    0.70 &    0.24 &     9.53 &  9.31$\pm$0.03 &  9.28$\pm$0.03 &  9.25$\pm$0.03 &  9.25$\pm$0.03 &  9.09$\pm$0.10 \\
649:    J16094434-3913301 &  HBC 626   &    0.83 &    0.42 &     9.42 &  8.85$\pm$0.03 &  8.50$\pm$0.03 &  8.29$\pm$0.04 &  7.80$\pm$0.04 &  4.97$\pm$0.03 \\
650:    J16094864-3911169 &   Sz 118, Lup 648   &    1.11 &    0.67 &     8.69 &  7.56$\pm$0.03 &  7.05$\pm$0.03 &  6.70$\pm$0.03 &  6.04$\pm$0.04 &  3.25$\pm$0.03 \\
651:    J16095399-3923275 &  Lupus 3 59 &    0.80 &    0.36 &     8.84 &  8.20$\pm$0.03 &  8.07$\pm$0.03 &  7.99$\pm$0.04 &  7.39$\pm$0.04 &  4.79$\pm$0.03 \\
652:    J16095707-3859479 &  HBC 627   &    0.73 &    0.25 &     9.42 &  9.28$\pm$0.03 &  9.20$\pm$0.03 &  9.16$\pm$0.03 &  9.15$\pm$0.03 &  \nodata \\
653: \enddata
654: \tablenotetext{a}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
655: \tablenotetext{b}{Saturated in IRAC}
656: \end{deluxetable}
657: \clearpage
658: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllll}
659: \rotate
660: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
661: \tablewidth{0pt}
662: \tablecaption{New Members of Lupus 3\label{tab:new}}
663: \tablehead{
664: \colhead{} &
665: \colhead{} &
666: \colhead{Membership} &
667: \colhead{} &
668: \colhead{} &
669: \colhead{} &
670: \colhead{} &
671: \colhead{} &
672: \colhead{} &
673: \colhead{} &
674: \colhead{} \\
675: \colhead{2MASS\tablenotemark{a}} &
676: \colhead{Spectral Type\tablenotemark{b}} &
677: \colhead{Evidence\tablenotemark{c}} &
678: \colhead{$J-H$\tablenotemark{a}} &
679: \colhead{$H-K_s$\tablenotemark{a}} &
680: \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{a}} &
681: \colhead{[3.6]} &
682: \colhead{[4.5]} &
683: \colhead{[5.8]} &
684: \colhead{[8.0]} &
685: \colhead{[24]}}
686: \startdata
687:    J16073773-3921388\tablenotemark{d} &      M5.75 & e,NaK,FeH,ex &    0.67 &    0.44 &    12.13 & 11.54$\pm$0.03 & 11.18$\pm$0.03 & 10.87$\pm$0.03 & 10.13$\pm$0.04 &  7.77$\pm$0.07 \\
688:    J16080017-3902595\tablenotemark{e,f} &      M5.25 & Li,NaK,FeH,ex &    0.69 &    0.38 &    11.07 & 10.57$\pm$0.03 & 10.19$\pm$0.03 &  9.92$\pm$0.03 &  9.29$\pm$0.04 &         \nodata \\
689:    J16081497-3857145 &      M4.75 & NaK,FeH,ex &    1.01 &    1.07 &    13.13 & 11.93$\pm$0.03 & 11.29$\pm$0.03 & 10.79$\pm$0.03 & 10.24$\pm$0.04 &  7.56$\pm$0.07 \\
690:    J16083733-3923109\tablenotemark{g} &      M7.75 & e,NaK,FeH,ex,$A_V$ &    0.93 &    0.41 &    13.83 & 12.72$\pm$0.03 & 12.41$\pm$0.05 & 12.10$\pm$0.04 & 11.49$\pm$0.06 &  6.81$\pm$0.04 \\
691:    J16085373-3914367\tablenotemark{f} &       M5.5 & e,NaK,FeH,ex,$A_V$ &    1.53 &    0.92 &    12.52 & 11.45$\pm$0.03 & 11.03$\pm$0.03 & 10.71$\pm$0.03 & 10.11$\pm$0.04 &         \nodata \\
692:    J16085953-3856275\tablenotemark{f} &         M8 & NaK,FeH,ex &    0.61 &    0.46 &    12.84 & 12.14$\pm$0.03 & 11.72$\pm$0.03 & 11.22$\pm$0.03 & 10.63$\pm$0.04 &  7.62$\pm$0.05 \\
693: \enddata
694: \tablenotetext{a}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
695: \tablenotetext{b}{Uncertainties are $\pm0.25$ subclass.}
696: \tablenotetext{c}{Membership in Lupus~3 is indicated by $A_V\gtrsim1$ and
697: a position above the main sequence for the distance of Lupus~3 (``$A_V$"),
698: strong emission lines (``e"), weak absorption in Na~I, K~I, and FeH (``NaK" 
699: and "FeH"), strong Li absorption (``Li"), and IR excess emission (``ex").}
700: \tablenotetext{d}{Lup 713s.}
701: \tablenotetext{e}{Lup 706.}
702: \tablenotetext{f}{X-ray source from \citet{gon06}.}
703: \tablenotetext{g}{Lup 604s.}
704: \end{deluxetable}
705: \clearpage
706: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
707: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
708: \tablewidth{0pt}
709: \tablecaption{Candidate Members of Lupus~3\label{tab:cand}}
710: \tablehead{
711: \colhead{ID} &
712: \colhead{$J-H$\tablenotemark{a}} & 
713: \colhead{$H-K_s$\tablenotemark{a}} & 
714: \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{a}} &
715: \colhead{[3.6]} &
716: \colhead{[4.5]} &
717: \colhead{[5.8]} &
718: \colhead{[8.0]} &
719: \colhead{[24]}
720: }
721: \startdata
722: 2MASS J16075475-3915446 &    1.09 &    1.66 &    14.45 & 12.54$\pm$0.03 & 11.74$\pm$0.03 & 11.14$\pm$0.03 & 10.64$\pm$0.04 &  7.23$\pm$0.05 \\
723: 2MASS J16080175-3912316\tablenotemark{b} &    1.34 &    0.81 &    14.25 & 13.43$\pm$0.03 & 13.07$\pm$0.04 & 12.62$\pm$0.05 & 11.90$\pm$0.08 &  8.39$\pm$0.10 \\
724: 2MASS J16080618-3912225 &    1.50 &    0.86 &     7.67 &  6.81$\pm$0.03 &  6.51$\pm$0.03 &  6.28$\pm$0.03 &  5.75$\pm$0.03 &  4.06$\pm$0.03 \\
725: IRAC J16082811-3913098\tablenotemark{c} &      \nodata &      \nodata &       \nodata & 12.07$\pm$0.03 & 11.90$\pm$0.03 & 11.64$\pm$0.03 & 10.78$\pm$0.04 &  7.85$\pm$0.06 \\
726: IRAC J16083010-3922592 &      \nodata &      \nodata &       \nodata & 15.18$\pm$0.05 & 14.66$\pm$0.04 & 13.88$\pm$0.08 & 12.69$\pm$0.09 &  8.79$\pm$0.09 \\
727: IRAC J16083110-3856000\tablenotemark{b} &      \nodata &      \nodata &       \nodata & 15.06$\pm$0.05 & 14.26$\pm$0.04 & 13.37$\pm$0.06 & 12.79$\pm$0.09 &  8.99$\pm$0.12 \\
728: IRAC J16084679-3902074\tablenotemark{b} &      \nodata &      \nodata &       \nodata & 14.69$\pm$0.04 & 14.02$\pm$0.04 & 13.29$\pm$0.06 & 12.27$\pm$0.08 &  8.43$\pm$0.11 \\
729: 2MASS J16084747-3905087 &    1.08 &    0.54 &    14.83 & 12.86$\pm$0.03 & 12.19$\pm$0.03 & 11.54$\pm$0.04 & 10.80$\pm$0.09 &  7.21$\pm$0.22 \\
730: 2MASS J16085324-3914401\tablenotemark{b} &    1.04 &    0.48 &     9.80 &  9.15$\pm$0.03 &  8.85$\pm$0.03 &  8.59$\pm$0.03 &  8.04$\pm$0.04 &  5.27$\pm$0.04 \\
731: 2MASS J16085529-3848481 &    0.59 &    0.38 &    12.02 & 11.41$\pm$0.03 & 10.92$\pm$0.03 & 10.70$\pm$0.03 & 10.04$\pm$0.04 &  7.73$\pm$0.05 \\
732: IRAC J16093418-3915127 &      \nodata &      \nodata &       \nodata & 15.29$\pm$0.09 & 14.47$\pm$0.06 & 13.81$\pm$0.09 & 12.60$\pm$0.06 &  9.76$\pm$0.29 \\
733: 2MASS J16095628-3859518\tablenotemark{d} &    0.61 &    0.40 &    11.99 & 11.41$\pm$0.03 & 11.11$\pm$0.03 & 10.78$\pm$0.03 &  9.99$\pm$0.04 &  7.27$\pm$0.06 \\
734: 2MASS J16100133-3906449 &    1.06 &    0.62 &    10.52 &  9.90$\pm$0.03 &  9.61$\pm$0.03 &  9.34$\pm$0.03 &  8.92$\pm$0.03 &  6.37$\pm$0.04 \\
735: \enddata
736: \tablenotetext{a}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
737: \tablenotetext{b}{X-ray source from \citet{gon06}.}
738: \tablenotetext{c}{Lup 607/707. This source is detected by 2MASS, but does
739: not appear in the 2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
740: \tablenotetext{d}{Lup 818s.}
741: \end{deluxetable}
742: \clearpage
743: \begin{figure}
744: \epsscale{0.8}
745: \plotone{f1.eps}
746: \caption{False-color image of the Lupus 3 star-forming region consisting
747: of {\it Spitzer} data at 3.6, 8.0, and 24~\micron. Previously-known members
748: ({\it circles}) and new members found in this work ({\it crosses}) are
749: indicated. The unmarked red source to the east of the central cluster is 
750: IRAS~16059-3857. The size of the image is $40\arcmin\times28\arcmin$.
751: }
752: \label{fig:image}
753: \end{figure}
754: 
755: \begin{figure}
756: \epsscale{0.6}
757: \plotone{f2.eps}
758: \caption{
759: {\it Spitzer} IRAC color-color diagrams for the Lupus~3 star-forming region.
760: {\it Top}:
761: The previously known members of Lupus ({\it circles}, Table~\ref{tab:old})
762: exhibit either neutral colors consistent with stellar photospheres or 
763: significantly redder colors that are indicative of circumstellar disks. 
764: {\it Bottom}: Among the other point sources in the IRAC data, 
765: we selected a sample of six candidate disk-bearing members based on colors
766: of $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$ and $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$ ({\it dashed line}) and
767: obtained spectra of them (Figure~\ref{fig:spec1}),
768: which are all classified as new members ({\it crosses}, Table~\ref{tab:new}). 
769: Only objects with photometric errors less than 0.1~mag in all four bands
770: are shown in these two diagrams.
771: The reddening vector is based on the extinction law from \citet{ind05}.
772: }
773: \label{fig:1234}
774: \end{figure}
775: 
776: \begin{figure}
777: \epsscale{1.0}
778: \plotone{f3.eps}
779: \caption{
780: {\it Spitzer} IRAC color-magnitude diagram for the Lupus~3 star-forming region.
781: We show the previously known members of Lupus 
782: ({\it circles}), objects that have red colors in Figure~\ref{fig:1234} and
783: that have been spectroscopically classified as new members 
784: ({\it crosses}, Table~\ref{tab:new}),
785: and the remaining candidate disk-bearing members from Figure~\ref{fig:1234}
786: that lack spectroscopy ({\it filled circles}, Table~\ref{tab:cand}).
787: Only objects with photometric errors less than 0.1~mag in all four bands
788: are shown in this diagram.
789: The reddening vector is based on the extinction law from \citet{ind05}.
790: }
791: \label{fig:cmd}
792: \end{figure}
793: 
794: \begin{figure}
795: \epsscale{0.6}
796: \plotone{f4.eps}
797: \caption{
798: Optical spectra of new members of the Lupus 3 star-forming region discovered 
799: in this work ({\it solid lines}) compared to best-fit averages of standard 
800: dwarfs and giants ({\it dotted lines}). The spectra have been corrected for 
801: extinction, which is 
802: quantified in parentheses by the magnitude difference of the reddening between 
803: 0.6 and 0.9~\micron\ ($E(0.6-0.9)$). The data are displayed at a resolution 
804: of 18~\AA\ and are normalized at 7500~\AA.
805: }
806: \label{fig:spec1}
807: \end{figure}
808: 
809: \begin{figure}
810: \epsscale{0.6}
811: \plotone{f5.eps}
812: \caption{
813: Optical spectrum of 2M~1541-3345 ({\it solid lines}) and three comparison
814: spectra ({\it dotted lines}). The spectrum of 2M~1541-3345 agrees well
815: with the average of a dwarf and giant at M5.75 and with the spectrum
816: of the M5.75 Lupus member 2M~1607-3921.
817: Although \citet{jay06} reported a spectral type of M8 for
818: 2M~1541-3345, its spectrum differs significantly from that of the average of
819: standard M8 dwarfs and giants. The data are displayed at a resolution
820: of 18~\AA\ and are normalized at 7500~\AA.
821: }
822: \label{fig:spec2}
823: \end{figure}
824: 
825: \begin{figure}
826: \epsscale{1.0}
827: \plotone{f6.eps}
828: \caption{
829: Gravity-sensitive absorption lines for 2M~1541-3345 ({\it solid lines})
830: and the M5.75 Lupus~3 member 2M~1607-3921 ($\tau\sim1$~Myr, {\it dotted 
831: lines}).
832: These data indicate that 2M~1541-3345 has a higher surface gravity than
833: 2M~1607-3921. Thus, 2M~1541-3345 is older than $\sim1$~Myr and is not
834: a member of the current generation of star formation in Lupus.
835: The data are displayed at a resolution of 6~\AA.
836: }
837: \label{fig:spec3}
838: \end{figure}
839: 
840: \end{document}
841: