1: %%
2: %% This is file `esapub.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% esapub.dtx (with options: `manual')
8: %% ============================================
9: %% This is the manual describing the usage of
10: %% esapub.cls
11: %% ============================================
12: %% Copyright 1999 Patrick W Daly
13: %% Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Aeronomie
14: %% Max-Planck-Str. 2
15: %% D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau
16: %% Germany
17: %% E-mail: daly@linmpi.mpg.de
18: %%
19: %% -------------------------------------------------
20: \ProvidesFile{esapub.tex}
21: [2001/04/25 1.1 (PWD)]
22: \documentclass[a4paper,twocolumn]{esapub2005} % European paper
23: \pagestyle{empty}
24:
25: % introduce this option for the ESA publications style
26: \bibliographystyle{alpha}
27:
28:
29: \def\pl{{\sc pl}}
30: \def\compps{{\sc compps}}
31: \def\kte{kT_{\rm e}}
32: \def\taut{\tau_{\rm T}}
33: \def\chiq{$\chi^2$}
34: \def\ktin{kT_{\rm in}}
35: \def\bb{{\sc bb}}
36: \def\ktbb{kT_{\rm bb}}
37: \def\rbb{R_{\rm bb}}
38: \def\gs{ {\sc Gaussian}}
39: \def\nh{ {$N_{\rm H}$}}
40: \def\dbb{ {\sc diskbb}}
41: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
42: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
43: \def\beq{\begin{eqnarray}}
44: \def\eeq{\end{eqnarray}}
45: \def\gax {\ifmmode{_>\atop^{\sim}}\else{${_>\atop^{\sim}}$}\fi}
46: \def\IGR{IGR~J00291+5934}
47: \def\SAX{SAX~J1808.4-3658}
48: \def\J1751{XTE~J1751-305}
49: \def\hete{HETE~J1900.1-2455}
50: \def\1807{XTE~J1807-294}
51:
52:
53:
54:
55:
56:
57:
58: \usepackage{times}
59: \usepackage{natbib}
60: \usepackage{graphicx}
61:
62: \title{Accreting X-ray millisecond pulsars observed with INTEGRAL}
63: \author{Maurizio Falanga}
64: \affil{CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique, F-91191, Gif
65: sur Yvette, France; e-mail: mfalanga@cea.fr}
66: \affil{Unit\'e mixte de recherche Astroparticule et
67: Cosmologie, 11 place Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France}
68:
69: \newcommand{\btx}{\textsc{Bib}\TeX}
70: \newcommand{\filename}{esapub}
71:
72: \begin{document}
73:
74: \keywords{pulsars: individual (XTE J1807-294, IGR
75: J00291+5934, HETE J1900.1-2455) -- starts: neutron -- X-ray: binaries}
76:
77: \maketitle
78:
79: \begin{abstract}
80: I review the properties of three X-ray accreting millisecond pulsars
81: observed with INTEGRAL. Out of
82: seven recently discovered accretion-powered pulsars (one discovered by
83: INTEGRAL), three were observed with the INTEGRAL satellite up to 300 keV.
84: Detailed timing and spectral results will be
85: presented, including data obtained during the most recent outburst of
86: the pulsar HETE J1900.1-2455. Accreting X-ray millisecond pulsars are key
87: systems to understand the
88: spin and accretion history of neutron stars. They are also a good
89: laboratory in which to study the source spectra, pulse profile, and
90: phase shift between
91: X-ray pulses in different energy ranges which give additional information
92: of the X-ray production processes and emission environment.
93: \end{abstract}
94:
95: \section{Introduction}
96:
97: Many low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXB) consist of a neutron star
98: accreting from a low mass companion star ($<$ 1 $M_{\odot}$).
99: Accreting matter may spin up the neutron
100: star (NS); therefore, one of the possible endpoints of
101: the evolution of a low-mass X-ray binary is expected to be a
102: millisecond pulsar, i.e. a
103: rapidly spinning NS with a rather weak, $\sim 10^{8}$ Gauss, surface
104: magnetic field. Although evidence for rapidly spinning NS in LMXBs
105: was inferred from the burst oscillations that were seen during type I
106: X-ray bursts in several systems \citep[see][for a review]{stroh01},
107: the detection of millisecond pulsations in persistent emission remained
108: elusive for many years until the discovery of the first accreting
109: millisecond pulsar by \citet{wvdk98}. Since that
110: time, a total of seven accreting MSPs have been detected.
111:
112: All of the accreting MSPs are X-ray transients; they spend most of
113: the time in a quiescent phase, with X-ray luminosities of order
114: of $10^{31}-10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$. They sometimes show X-ray outbursts
115: reaching X-ray luminosities of $10^{36}-10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
116: during which coherent pulsations are observed with
117: frequencies in the range between 180 and 435 Hz \citep[see reviews
118: by][]{w05,p06}. This frequency is interpreted as the NS rotation
119: frequency given by a hot spot (or spots) in an atmospheric layer of
120: the rotating NS \citep{Chakrabarty03}. MSPs represent a new
121: class of objects connecting accretion powered X-ray pulsars with
122: rotation powered millisecond radio pulsars.
123:
124: MSP energy spectra are successfully fitted by a two-component model
125: consisting of a multicolor blackbody soft X-ray emission and a
126: Comptonized spectrum for the hard X-ray emission.
127: The soft thermal component could be associated with the
128: radiation from the accretion disc and/or the heated NS surface around the
129: shock \citep[see e.g.][]{gp05,p06}. The hard emission is likely to be
130: produced by thermal Comptonization in the hot accretion shock on the
131: NS surface \citep{gdb02,pg03} with the seed photons coming from the
132: stellar surface. The observed hard spectra are similar to the spectra
133: observed from atoll sources in their hard, low-luminosity state \citep{b00}.
134: A representative spectrum of the three observed MSP (XTE~ J1807-294
135: \citep{mfa05}, IGR~J00291+5934 \citep{mfb05}, and HETE J1900.1-2455
136: \citep{mf06}) with INTEGRAL is shown in Figure 1, 2 and 3.
137:
138: Recent years have shown INTEGRAL gave additional contributions to the
139: study of MSPs. Our timing analysis of
140: IGR~J00291+5934 showed for the first time that INTEGRAL/ISGRI is
141: capable of detecting the pulse profile of a 1.67 ms pulsar up to 150
142: keV. This allowed us to study the pulsed fraction up to this high energy. We
143: confirmed for the first time the increase of the pulsed fraction with
144: energy in an accretion powered MSP, explained by the action of the
145: Doppler effect on the exponentially cutoff Comptonization spectrum
146: from the hot spot or from a componization model where we account the
147: pulsed fraction to be produced in a corona cloud. We also measured
148: soft time lags with a complex energy dependence. Similarly to SAX
149: J1808.4-3658 and XTE~J1751-350, the time lags increase rapidly with
150: energy until ~10 keV. However, in IGR~J00291+5934, the
151: time lags first increase and then decrease slightly, saturating above
152: 15 keV, and possibly reaching zero around 50 keV. This is a intriguing
153: result, and if confirmed or observed in another object could be a
154: serious challenge to any time-lag model. Additionally, with RXTE we
155: measured an increase of the NS spin period during accretion for the
156: first time. This provided a strong
157: confirmation of the theory of 'recycled' pulsars in which the old
158: neutron stars in LMXBs become millisecond radio pulsars through
159: spin-up by transfer of angular momentum by the accreting material
160: \citep{mfb05}.
161:
162: Analysis of the recent ToO observation of HETE~J1900.1-2455 is also
163: discussed. We observe in this object Type I X-ray bursts showing,
164: at high energy, evidence of photospheric radius expansion in the burst
165: profile. Using JEM-X/ISGRI data at high energy, and assuming the bolometric
166: burst peak luminosity during photospheric radius expansion to be
167: saturated at the Eddington limit, we measure
168: the source distance to be around 5 kpc. A very interesting result is
169: that the pulsations at the spin frequency are not always observed in
170: this source.
171:
172: \section{X-ray spectra}
173:
174:
175: \begin{figure}[ht]
176: \centering
177: \includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth,angle=-90]{fig_5.ps}
178: %\vspace{4cm}
179: \caption{Simultaneous INTEGRAL, XMM-Newton and RXTE
180: spectra of XTE~J1807--294 fitted with an absorbed disk black body, {\sc
181: diskbb}, plus {\sc compps} model. The EPIC-pn and MOS2 spectra in the
182: 0.5--10 keV range and PCA/HEXTE in the 3--200 keV and
183: IBIS/ISGRI in the 20--200 keV range are shown. The {\sc
184: diskbb} model is shown by a dotted curve, the dashed curve
185: gives the {\sc compps} model, while the total spectrum is
186: shown by a solid curve. The lower panel presents the residuals.}
187: \label{fig:XTEJ1807}
188: \end{figure}
189:
190: \begin{figure}[ht]
191: \centering
192: \includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth,angle=-90]{3472fig3.ps}
193: %\vspace{4cm}
194: \caption{The unfolded spectrum of \IGR\ fitted with an absorbed
195: {\sc compps} model. The data points correspond to the JEM-X
196: (5--20 keV) and ISGRI (20--200 keV) spectra,
197: respectively. The total spectrum of the model is shown by a
198: solid curve. The lower panel presents the residuals between
199: the data and the model.}
200: \label{fig:IGRJ00201}
201: \end{figure}
202:
203: \begin{figure}[ht]
204: \centering
205: \includegraphics[width=0.65\linewidth,angle=-90]{f2.ps}
206: %\vspace{4cm}
207: \caption{The unfolded spectrum of HETE~J1900.1--2455 fitted with a
208: {\sc compps} model plus a {\sc bb} and a gaussian line. The
209: data points correspond to the PCA (3--22 keV), JEM-X (3--22
210: keV), HEXTE (16--90 keV) and the ISGRI (20--300 keV) spectra,
211: respectively. The blackbody model is shown by a dot-dashed
212: curve, the dotted curve gives the {\sc compps} model, the
213: dashed curve is the line, the total spectrum is shown by the
214: solid curve. The lower panel presents the residuals between
215: the data and the model.
216: }
217: \label{fig:HeteJ1900}
218: \end{figure}
219:
220: For the INTEGRAL observed MSP sources the high energy spectrum could be
221: described with a photon index of $\sim$ 1.8--2.0 and a cut-off energy at $\sim$
222: 80--100 keV. However, the model does not describe the spectrum below
223: 15 keV well, which requires a more complex description.
224: MSP energy broad-band spectra are successfully fitted by a
225: two-component model consisting of a multicolor blackbody soft X-ray
226: emission and a
227: Comptonized spectrum, for the hard X-ray emission. The soft thermal
228: component could be associated with the radiation from the accretion
229: disc and/or the heated NS surface around the shock. The hard emission
230: is likely to be produced by thermal Comptonization in the hot
231: accretion shock on the NS surface with the seed photons coming from the
232: stellar surface. The spectra are best fitted with the thermal
233: Comptonization model {\sc compps} in the slab geometry
234: \citep{ps96}. The main model parameters are the Thomson optical depth
235: $\tau_{\rm T}$ across the slab, the electron temperature
236: $kT_{\rm e}$, the soft seed photon temperature $kT_{\rm seed}$, and
237: the inclination angle $\theta$ between the slab normal and the line of sight.
238: The seed photons are supposed to be injected from the bottom of the
239: slab. The soft thermal emission is fitted by a simple blackbody, {\sc bb},
240: or a multi-temperature disc blackbody, {\sc dbb}, model \citep{mitsuda84}.
241: The best fit parameters for the three observed MSP with INTEGRAL are
242: reported in Table \ref{table:spec}. In Fig. \ref{fig:XTEJ1807},
243: \ref{fig:IGRJ00201}, and \ref{fig:HeteJ1900}, we show the unfolded spectrum
244: and the residuals of the data to the {\sc bb} or {\sc dbb} plus
245: {\sc compps} model.
246:
247: The spectra of \1807, \IGR, and \hete\ are well described by
248: a combination of thermal Comptonization and a disk black body or
249: simple black body.
250: The hard spectral component contributes most of the observed flux (70--80
251: per cent), even though a soft component (disk black body) is required
252: by the data. If the accretion disk is truncated at the
253: magnetosphere radius where the material can accrete along the magnetic
254: field towards the pole of a NS, the matter over the
255: pole is heated by a shock to a temperature of $\sim$ 30--50 keV. The hot spot
256: at the surface with temperature $\sim$ 0.8--1.5 keV gives rise to the seed
257: photons for Comptonization in the hot plasma. Since the hard X-ray
258: emission is pulsed (see Sec. 3.1), a fraction of it must
259: originate from the regions confined by the magnetic field. The most
260: obvious source of hard X-rays is the place where material collimated by
261: the magnetic fields impacts the surface.
262:
263: For \1807, if we consider the inclination of the system to be
264: $60^{\circ}<i<83^{\circ}$, this allows us to determine the inner disk radius
265: which lies in the range 20--40 km (for the distance of 8 kpc).
266: The apparent area of the seed
267: photons is $A_{\rm seed} \sim 26 (D/8 \ {\rm kpc})^{2} {\rm km}^{2}$,
268: which is also what expected from a hot spot on a NS surface.
269: Many characteristics of the source are similar to those observed in
270: other MSPs, SAX~J1808.4--3658 \citep{gdb02,pg03} and XTE~J1751--305
271: \citep{gp05}. For \IGR\ no additional thermal-like
272: component (either blackbody or disk blackbody) was required by the
273: fit, very likely because the bulk of its emission occurs below 3 keV,
274: outside the covered energy range. However, the apparent area of the seed
275: photons, which turns out to be
276: $A_{\rm seed}\sim 21 (D/5\ {\rm kpc})^{2}$ km$^2$, could correspond to
277: a hot spot radius of $\sim2.5$ km during the INTEGRAL ToO outburst phase.
278:
279: Only \hete's spectrum differs from other MSP in requiring thermal
280: soft X-ray emission with nearly double the temperature.
281: We could not distinguish between the multi-temperature blackbody and
282: single blackbody models, as both gave comparable parameters and $\chi^2$.
283: However, for a distance of 5 kpc, the disk blackbody gives
284: an inner disk radius, $R_{\rm in} \sqrt{\cos\,i} = 2.6$ km,
285: smaller than the expected NS radius. For the blackbody emission, the
286: fit implies the apparent area of the emission region
287: $A_{\rm seed} \sim 14$ km$^2$, which could be consistent with the
288: heated NS surface around the accretion shock \citep{pg03,gp05}.
289: From our spectral fits we infer that this emission is not
290: likely produced in a multi-temperature accretion
291: disk but more likely arises from thermal emission at the NS
292: surface.
293:
294:
295: We note that the product $\taut\times\kte$ is very close
296: in the three sources. The spectral shape and the product $\taut\times\kte$
297: are very stable during the outburst as is observed
298: in other sources too \citep[e.g.][]{gp05}. The constancy of the
299: spectral slopes during the outbursts and their extreme similarity
300: in different MSPs can be used as an argument that the
301: emission region geometry does not depend on the accretion rate.
302: If the energy dissipation takes place in a hot shock, while the cooling
303: of the electrons (that emit X/$\gamma$-rays via thermal Comptonization)
304: is determined by the reprocessing of the hard
305: X-ray radiation at the neutron star surface (so called two-phase model,
306: the spectral slope is determined by the energy balance in the hot phase
307: and is a function of the geometry. At constant geometry (e.g. slab),
308: the temperature depends on the optical depth, but $\taut \times \kte$
309: is approximately constant.
310:
311: \begin{table*}[htb]
312: \begin{center}
313: \caption{\label{table:spec}Best-fit spectral parameters with
314: {\sc compps} + {\sc bb} (or {\sc diskbb}) model.}
315: \begin{tabular}{llll}
316: \hline
317: \noalign{\smallskip}
318: & XTE~J1708-294 & IGR~J00291+5934& HETE~J1900.1-2455 \\
319: \hline
320: \noalign{\smallskip}
321: $N_{\rm H} (10^{22} {\rm cm}^{-2})$ & $0.56$ (f) & $0.28$ (f) & $0.16$ (f)\\
322: $kT_{\rm in}$ or $kT_{\rm BB}$(keV) & -- & 0.43$^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ &
323: 0.8$^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$\\
324: $R_{\rm in} \sqrt{\cos i}^{\ a}$ (km) & $13.4^{+2.2}_{-1.3}$ & -- & --\\
325: $R_{\rm bb}^{\ a}$ (km) & -- & -- & $4.8^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$\\
326: %$E_{\rm Fe}$ (keV) & -- & -- & 6.42$_{-0.15}^{+0.1}$ \\
327: %$\sigma_{\rm Fe}$ (keV) & -- & -- & 0.5 (f) \\
328: $kT_{\rm e}$ (keV) & $37.2^{+28}_{-10}$ & $49^{+2}_{-6}$ & $27.9^{+1.8}_{-1.4}$\\
329: $kT_{\rm seed}$ (keV) & $0.75^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ &
330: $1.49^{+0.16}_{-0.32}$ & $1.4^{+0.16}_{-0.32}$\\
331: $\tau_{\rm T}$ & $1.7^{+0.5}_{-0.8}$ & $1.12^{+0.04}_{-0.07}$ & $2.0^{+0.06}_{-0.1}$\\
332: $A_{\rm seed}^{a}$ (km$^2$) & $26^{+23}_{-12}$ &
333: $20.7^{+12.6}_{-4.5}$ & $14.2^{0.3}_{0.3}$\\
334: cos $\theta $ & $0.79^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ & $0.6^{+0.06}_{-0.09}$ &
335: 0.59$^{+0.05}_{-0.07}$ \\
336: $L_{\rm bol}^{a}$ ($10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$) & 3.6 & 3.7 & 4.9\\
337: \noalign{\smallskip}
338: \hline
339: \noalign{\smallskip}
340: %\multicolumn{4}{l}{$^{a}$ Assuming a distance of 5 kpc.}
341: \end{tabular}
342: \end{center}
343: \end{table*}
344:
345:
346: \section{Timing}
347:
348:
349: The timing analysis of
350: IGR~J00291+5934 showed for the first time that INTEGRAL/ISGRI is
351: capable of detecting the pulse profile of a 1.67 ms pulsar up to 150
352: keV. This allowed us to study the pulsed fraction up to this high energy. We
353: confirmed for the first time the increase of the pulsed fraction with
354: energy in an accretion powered MSP. This can be explained by two
355: models: the action of the
356: Doppler effect on the exponentially cutoff Comptonization spectrum
357: from the hot spot, or a componization model where the
358: pulsed fraction is produced in a corona cloud. We also measured
359: soft time lags with a complex energy dependence. Similarly to SAX
360: J1808.4-3658 and XTE~ J1751-350, the time lags increase rapidly with
361: energy until ~10 keV. However, in IGR~~J00291+5934, the
362: time lags first increase and then decrease slightly, saturating above
363: 15 keV, and possibly reaching zero around 50 keV, see Fig. 6.
364:
365: \subsection{Pulsed fraction of X-rays}
366:
367: \begin{figure}[ht]
368: \centering
369: \includegraphics[width=0.53\linewidth,angle=90]{f1.eps}
370: %\vspace{4cm}
371: \caption{This cartoon illustrates the different emission patterns
372: responsible for the time lags of the pulsed emission.
373: $\theta_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}$ and $\theta_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}$ are the
374: dimensionless temperature of the accretion column and reflector,
375: respectively, and $C_{\rm ill}\sim 0.1$ is the disk illumination fraction.
376: Soft time lag of the pulsed emission is the result of downscattering
377: of hard X-ray photons in the relative cold plasma of the disk.
378: A fraction of hard X-ray photons $1-C_{\rm ill}$ directly seen by the
379: observer are upscattered soft photons coming from NS and the
380: disk. We account for the pulsed flux (pulsed fraction) as being
381: produced in the corona cloud.}
382: \label{fig:geom}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: We found for \IGR\ using the RXTE and INTEGRAL/ISGRI data that the
386: pulsed fraction gradually increases with energy
387: from $\sim 6\%$ at 6 keV to $\sim 12-20 \%$ near 100 keV. This is the
388: first time such behaviour has been measured for any of the
389: accretion-powered MSPs.
390:
391: Since MSPs are rapidly rotating, a first interpretation is given
392: through a Doppler boosting model which affects the fast rotating spot
393: emitting pattern as a black body.
394: When the spot moves towards the observer, the emission
395: increases, while for a spot moving away, the flux drops.
396: The Doppler factor reaches the maximum a quarter of a period before the
397: peak of the projected area, shifting the emission peak towards an
398: earlier phase. The observed flux due to the Doppler effect varies
399: as the Doppler factor to the power $(3+\Gamma)$
400: \citep{pg03,vp04}, where the photon index $\Gamma$ could be a function
401: of energy. If the Doppler factor varies around 1 with 2\% amplitude,
402: we get 10\% variability.
403:
404: The Comptonized spectrum can be approximated as
405: \be
406: F_E \propto E^{-(\Gamma_0-1)} \exp\left( -[E/E_{\rm c}]^{\beta}\right) ,
407: \ee
408: where $E_{\rm c}\sim \kte$ is the energy of the cutoff and parameter
409: $\beta\sim2$ describes its sharpness.
410: The local photon index is then
411: \be
412: \Gamma(E)\equiv 1 - \frac{\mbox{d} \ln F_E }{\mbox{d} \ln E} =
413: \Gamma_0 + \beta (E/E_{\rm c})^{\beta} .
414: \ee
415: At low energies, $\Gamma\approx\Gamma_0$, and
416: rms (or pulsed fraction) is a very weak function of energy.
417: Close to the cutoff, the spectral index rapidly increases and
418: the pulsed fraction should grows with energy, as observed (see
419: Fig.~\ref{fig:PF}a).
420: The Comptonization models predict softening of the total spectrum
421: with simultaneous hardening of the pulsed spectrum at higher energies.
422:
423:
424: \begin{figure}[ht]
425: \centering
426: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{f3.eps}
427: %\vspace{4cm}
428: \caption{The observed energy dependent pulsed fraction of
429: (a) \IGR\, (b) XTE J1751-305, and (c) SAX J1808.4-3658 along with the
430: best-fit comtonization model.
431: }
432: \label{fig:PF}
433: \end{figure}
434:
435:
436: On the other hand, the pulsed fraction of \IGR\ vs
437: energy can be also explained by the energy
438: dependent electron cross-section $\sigma_e(E) =\sigma_{\rm T}(1-2z)$
439: and consequently by Compton cloud optical depth as a function energy
440: \begin{equation}
441: \tau_{\rm cl}(E)=\tau_{{\rm T, cl}}(1-2z),
442: \label{electron_tau}
443: \end{equation}
444: where $z=E/m_ec^2$ is a dimensionless photon energy.
445: In Figure \ref{fig:PF} we show the energy dependent pulsed fraction of
446: (a) \IGR, (b) \J1751\ and (c) \SAX.
447: In fact, we assume that the accretion column is embedded in
448: Compton cloud as shown in Figure \ref{fig:geom} \citep[see also][for
449: the geometry details]{TCW}.
450: % \citep[see][for the details of geometry]{tok}.
451: Because $\tau_{\rm cl}(E)$ decreases with energy, at higher
452: energies a larger fraction of the pulsed direct hard X-ray radiation
453: \begin{equation}
454: A_{\rm rms,es}(E)=A_{\rm rms,es}(0)\exp[-\tau_{\rm cl}(E)]
455: \label{A-fraction}
456: \end{equation}
457: originating in the accretion column can escape to the observer.
458:
459: A different scenario of the energy dependent amplitude formation
460: would be if
461: one can assume that there is no electron (Compton) cloud between the
462: accretion column (where the Comptonization spectrum is formed) and the
463: observer, but the energy dependence of the amplitude is formed as a
464: result of upscattering.
465: The soft photons upscattered off of hot electrons (of the accretion
466: column) increase their energy with a number of scatterings.
467: On the other hand, the amplitude of the pulsed radiation exponentially
468: decreases
469: with a number of scatterings $A_{\rm rms}(u)=A_{\rm rms}(0)\exp(-\beta u)$,
470: where $\beta$ is the inverse of an average number of scatterings
471: \citep[see e.g.][]{ST80} and consequently with a energy of the
472: upscattered photon
473: \begin{equation}
474: A_{\rm rms,up}[u(E)]=A_{\rm rms,up}(E_s)(E/E_s)^{-\alpha_{\rm cl}}
475: \label{A-upscatter_fraction}
476: \end{equation}
477: (where $\alpha_{\rm cl}=\beta/4\theta$ is approximately the energy index
478: of the Comptonization spectrum). A characteristic seed (disk and NS)
479: photon energy is $E_s< 5$ keV and consequently, all photons at
480: higher energies ($>5$ keV) are produced by upscattering. The
481: amplitude of upscattered photons (in which the energy is higher 5 keV)
482: should decrease with energy.
483:
484: In the general case, some fraction of the pulsed soft photons,
485: $A_{\rm rms,up}$, upscatter off hot electrons in the accretion column on the
486: way out as another fraction of the pulsed photons, $A_{\rm rms,es}$, forming
487: the hard X-ray tail escape to the observer passing through the Compton cloud.
488: % one should take into account both of these effects
489: %combined effect of photon upscattering and escape
490: %on the amplitude of the pulsed radiation.
491: In this case a following combination of Eqs. (\ref{A-fraction}
492: and \ref{A-upscatter_fraction})
493: \begin{equation}
494: A_{\rm rms}(E)= A_{\rm rms,up}(E/E_s)^{-\alpha_{\rm cl}} + A_{\rm rms,es}e^{-\tau_{\rm cl}(E)}
495: \label{A-general_fraction}
496: \end{equation}
497: leads us to the formula of the emergent pulsed amplitude.
498:
499:
500: In Figure \ref{fig:PF} we present the best-fit model (see
501: Eq. \ref{A-general_fraction}) along with data points. We fit only
502: the data points which correspond to energies higher than the seed
503: photon energy. We found for (a) \IGR\ the Compton cloud
504: optical depth to be $\tau_{\rm T, cl} = 3\pm0.2$ and $A_{\rm
505: rms,es} = 98^{+2}_{-6}$ \%, $A_{\rm rms,up} = 5.2\pm0.9$ \%. For (b)
506: $\tau_{\rm T, cl} = 0.25\pm0.09$ and $A_{\rm
507: rms,es} = 3.5\pm0.8$ \%, $A_{\rm rms,up} = 1.8\pm1.1$ \% and (c)
508: $\tau_{\rm T, cl} = 0.4\pm0.2$ and $A_{\rm rms,es} = 5.9\pm6$ \%,
509: $A_{\rm rms,up} = 2.5\pm1.2$ \%, respectively. For all of the fits
510: $\alpha_{\rm cl}$ was $\sim0.8$.
511:
512:
513:
514: \subsection{Time lag}
515:
516: \begin{figure}[ht]
517: \centering
518: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{f2.eps}
519: %\vspace{4cm}
520: \caption{The measured soft time lag of the pulse profile versus energy
521: (crosses) with respect to the first energy channel. The
522: best-fit curve using the Comptonization model (see Eq. 7)
523: is shown with the solid line. The dot-dashed lines in panel (a) correspond to the upper and lower limits of the electron number densities of the
524: Comptonization emission area, $n_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}$ and of the
525: reflector, $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}$ in \IGR.
526: The panels (b) and (c) are related to \J1751\ and (c) for \SAX.
527: The dot-dashed lines correspond to the upper and lower
528: limits of $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}$.
529: }
530: \label{fig:TL}
531: \end{figure}
532:
533: Additional information for the X-ray production processes and
534: emission environment can be obtained by studying the pulse profile
535: and phase shift between X-ray pulses at different energy ranges. For
536: \SAX\ and later for \J1751\ it was found that the low-energy pulses
537: lag behind the high-energy pulses (soft phase/time lags) monotonically
538: increasing with energy and saturating at about 10--20 keV
539: \citep{CMT98,Ford00,gp05}.
540:
541: First, this phase/time lag effect was interpreted as a result
542: of the photon delay due to downscattering of hard X-ray photons in the
543: relatively cold plasma of the disk or NS surface \citep{CMT98,TCW}.
544: They argued that the photon time lags were an intrinsic signature of
545: interaction of the Comptonized radiation with the NS and accretion disk
546: plasma. Moreover, the absolute values of time lags (about hundreds
547: $\mu$s) are consistent with the electron scattering time scale $t_{\rm
548: C}=\tau_{\rm T}(L/c)$. The effective Thomson optical depth of the cold
549: reflector $\tau_{\rm T}=n_e\sigma_{\rm T}L$ is about a few and
550: typical sizes of the NS photosphere and half-width of the disk $L$ are
551: of the
552: order of $10^{6}$ cm. On the other hand, \citet{pg03} suggested that
553: the lags may be produced by a combination of different angular
554: distribution of the radiation components and relativistic effects.
555: The observed spectrum of \IGR\ consists of a black body
556: from the neutron star surface and a component produced by
557: Comptonization of these seed photons in the hot electron region,
558: presumably a shock which can be represented as a plane-parallel slab.
559: The angular distributions of the black body and Comptonized
560: photons emitted by the slab are significantly different.
561: The difference in the emission patterns causes the two components
562: to show a different variability pattern as a function of the pulsar phase,
563: with the hard Comptonized component leading the soft black body
564: component. However, the soft lags found up to $\sim100$ keV in the 1.67 ms
565: accreting MSP \IGR, show a more complex energy dependence \citep{mfa05}.
566:
567: Recently, \citet{MFLT06} derived a Comptonization model for the
568: observed properties of the energy dependent soft/hard time lags. This
569: accounts for the soft lag by downscattering of hard
570: X-ray photons in the relatively cold plasma of the disk or neutron
571: star surface. A fraction of soft X-ray photons
572: coming from the disk or neutron star surface are upscattered off hot
573: electrons of accretion column and this effect leads to the hard lags
574: as a result of thermal Comptonization of the soft photons. The model
575: allows the observed soft and hard
576: lags to be reproduced by the downscattered and upscattered radiation
577: as a function of
578: the electron number densities of the reflector, $n_{e}^{\rm ref}$, and
579: the accretion column, $n_{ e}^{\rm hot}$. In the case of the
580: accretion-powered millisecond pulsars \IGR, \J1751, and \SAX\ the
581: observed time lags agree very strongly with the model (see
582: Fig. \ref{fig:TL}). The resulting time lags are seen as a linear
583: combination of the
584: positive (hard) time lags formed in the Comptonization emission area and
585: the negative (soft) ones formed in accretion disk and NS photosphere as a
586: result of reflection of the hard radiation (see Fig. \ref{fig:geom}):
587: $$
588: \Delta t = -\frac{C_{\rm ill}}{\sigma_{\rm T}n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref} c} \times
589: $$
590: \begin{equation}
591: %\nonumber \\
592: %& &\!\!\!
593: \biggl[\frac{1}{4\theta_{\rm ref}}\ln
594: %\Biggl|
595: \frac{1-4\theta_{\rm
596: ref}/z}{1-4\theta_{\rm ref}/z_{*}}
597: % \Biggr|\!\!
598: -\frac{n_{\rm
599: e}^{\rm ref}}{n_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}}\frac{1-C_{\rm ill}}{C_{\rm ill}}
600: \frac{\ln(z/z_{*})}{\ln[1+(3+\alpha)\theta_{\rm hot}]}\Biggr]
601: \label{res_timelag}
602: \end{equation}
603: where $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}$ is the electron number density of the reflector,
604: $n_{ e}^{\rm hot}$ is the electron number density of the
605: Comptonization emission area
606: (accretion column) and $\theta_{\rm ref}=kT_e^{\rm ref}/(m_{e} c^2)$ is a
607: dimensionless temperature of the reflector.
608: We assume a typical value of $\theta_{\rm ref} < 0.7$ keV/511 keV.
609: $kT_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}$ and $\alpha$ are the best-fit parameters for the hot
610: plasma temperature and spectral index of the Comptonization spectrum,
611: and $\theta_{\rm hot}=kT_{ e}^{\rm hot}/(m_{ e} c^2)$.
612:
613: We also assume that the seed photon energy is near
614: the lowest energy of the downscattered photons, i.e. $z_s\approx z_{\ast}$.
615: An observational value of $E_{\ast}$ is about 3 keV, and we
616: assume that the value of the illumination factor $C_{\rm ill}$ is
617: about 0.1 \citep[see for details][]{MFLT06}. To examine the predicted
618: time lag using the Comptonization model
619: Eq. (\ref{res_timelag}), we use the observed pulse phase lag data
620: and best-fit spectral parameters $kT_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}$ and
621: $\alpha$ of the accreting MSPs \IGR, \J1751, and \SAX. The \SAX\ data
622: were taken from \citet{CMT98,Ford00} and represented in
623: Figure \ref{fig:TL} by open circles and filled squares, respectively. The
624: data for \J1751 and \IGR\ were taken by \citet{gp05,mfa05}. For the reflector
625: temperature we used $kT_{\rm e}^{\rm ref} = 0.4$ keV for all fits.
626: The model to fit the time lags in \J1751\ and \SAX\
627: has only one free parameter (see \citep{MFLT06}), the number
628: density of the ``cold'' reflector $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}$. Presumably, in \J1751\
629: and \SAX\ the density of the Comptonization region is much higher than
630: that of the ``cold'' reflector, i.e. $n_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}\gg n_{\rm
631: e}^{\rm ref}$. It is not surprising that the seed photons are
632: Comptonized (upscattered) in the very dense plasma of the accretion column
633: \citep[see e.g.][]{BS76,BW06}. The best-fit values are $n_{\rm e}^{\rm
634: ref}= 6.3\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $3.2\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$
635: for \J1751\ and \SAX, respectively. The fits of the time lag
636: data for \IGR\ provide us the best-fit values of the ``cold'' and hot
637: plasma densities. Both the positive (upscattering) and negative
638: (downscattering) time lags contribute to the apparent time lags
639: because $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}= 6.9\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $n_{\rm
640: e}^{\rm hot}= 2.1\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$ are of the same order of
641: magnitude.
642:
643: The time lag data of \IGR, \J1751, and \SAX\ are collected in
644: different time intervals lasting from hours to days
645: \citep{CMT98,Ford00,gp05,mfa05}. However, a hydrodynamical
646: (density perturbation) time, $t_{hydro}$, in the
647: innermost part of X-ray NS source is on the order of the ratio of the
648: NS radius to the sound speed, namely $t_{hydro}\sim R_{\rm NS}/c_{\rm
649: sound}\gax 0.1$ s.
650: Thus, during the data collection periods the densities of the
651: surrounding plasma can vary. As a result, the time lags also
652: change because they are very sensitive to density variations (see
653: Eq. \ref{res_timelag}). In fact, these density variations can be inferred
654: from the time lag data. One can make a band between two curves of time
655: lags vs energy which contain all of the time lag data points (see
656: Fig. \ref{fig:TL}). This allows constraints to be put on $n_{\rm
657: e}^{\rm ref}$ and $n_{\rm e}^{\rm hot}$.
658: The lower and upper curves in Figure \ref{fig:TL}
659: correspond (a) to $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}= (6.1-8.0)\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$
660: and $n_{\rm e}^{\rm hot} = (1.6-2.6)\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$, respectively.
661: For the sources (b) \J1751\ and (c) \SAX\, the density variations are
662: $n_{\rm e}^{\rm ref}= (6.0-6.6)\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $n_{\rm
663: e}^{\rm ref}= (2.9-3.6)\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$.
664: Thus, the plasma density of the ``cold'' reflector can change as much as
665: 10 \% during the entire data collection.
666:
667:
668: Soft lags are observed only if $n_e^{ref}\ll n_e^{hot}$ and thus the
669: relative fraction of the dowscattering time lags in the total time lag
670: sum is $\sim$100\%.
671: However, Comptonization in a non-uniform accretion medium might
672: account for the observed time lag as a non-monotonic function of energy.
673: Using this model, upper and lower limits of the
674: atmosphere density (density variation) in the region of phase/time lag
675: measurements were determined. Using the observed energy dependent
676: pulsed amplitude one can find the variation of the Thomson optical depth of
677: Compton cloud in which the accretion column is embedded.
678:
679:
680: \section{Bursts}
681:
682: MSP are also known to exhibit Type-I X-ray bursts. These bursts were
683: observed for \SAX\ and XTE~J1814-338 \citep{gmh06,gc06}. Several X-ray bursts
684: have also been observed for \hete\ by various observatories
685: \citep{gmm06}. One of these bursts was also observed during the
686: INTEGRAL ToO observation \citep{mf06}. In Figure \ref{fig:lc_burst} we
687: show the JEM-X and ISGRI burst light curve (28 October 2005, 10:25:12
688: UTC) in different energy bands. The burst rise time was $0.23\pm0.05$
689: s. The double peak profile is clearly evident at
690: high energy (lower panel) within the first 12 s, while
691: during this time the intensity at lower energy (upper panel) remains
692: constant. This can be interpreted as a consequence of a photospheric
693: radius expansion (PRE) episode during the first part of the outburst
694: \citep[see e.g.,][]{vh95}. When a burst undergoes a PRE episode,
695: the luminosity remains nearly constant at
696: the Eddington value, the atmosphere expands, and its temperature
697: decreases resulting in a double-peak profile observed at high
698: energies. The tail of the burst at high energy can be seen for about 5
699: s after the PRE episode.
700:
701: A time-resolved analysis of the net burst spectrum based on the
702: JEM-X/ISGRI 3-50 keV energy band data was well fit by a
703: photoelectrically absorbed blackbody. During the first 12 s, the unabsorbed
704: bolometric flux was almost constant at $F_{\rm peak}=9.5(2)\times10^{-8}$ erg
705: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, while the blackbody temperature dropped in the middle,
706: simultaneously with an increase by a factor of $\sim1.5$ in blackbody
707: radius. The observed temperature reached a peak at $\sim$ 2.5 keV, and then
708: gradually decreased. The softening of the emission towards the end of the
709: decay phase is also indicated by the e-folding decay times
710: of $12.5\pm0.5$ s in the 3--6 keV to $4.3\pm0.7$ s in the 12--20 keV
711: energy band. This behavior is typically observed during PRE X-ray bursts.
712:
713: The burst fluence was $f_{\rm b}=1.67(6)\times10^{-8}$erg cm$^{-2}$,
714: calculated by integrating the measured $F_{\rm bol,bb}$ over the burst
715: duration of $\sim 50$ s. The effective burst duration was $\tau=f_{\rm
716: b}/F_{\rm peak}=18.2(8)$ s, and the ratio of the observed persistent flux to
717: the net peak flux was $\gamma=F_{\rm pers}/F_{\rm peak}=0.021(1)$.
718: The burst has the same spectral parameters as previous
719: bursts for this source observed with HETE-2 or RXTE \citep{gmh06}.
720: Assuming a helium burst at the Eddington limit and canonical
721: NS parameters (1.4 solar mass and radius of 10 km), the source
722: distance is estimated to be $\sim5$ kpc.
723:
724: From the observed {\it INTEGRAL} burst properties and the mass
725: accretion rates inferred from
726: the persistent luminosity, the present theory predicts that this
727: burst is pure helium burning. For helium
728: flashes, the fuel burns rapidly, since there are no slow weak
729: interactions, and the local Eddington limit is often exceeded. These
730: conditions lead to PRE bursts with a duration, set mostly by the time
731: it takes the heat to escape, of the order of 5--10 s, as
732: observed. In the framework of the
733: thermonuclear-flash models \citep[e.g.,][]{vh95} the burst
734: duration, $\tau < 20$ s, and the ratio of
735: the observed persistent flux to the net peak flux $\gamma\approx0.02$ indicate
736: a hydrogen-poor burst which is in agreement with the companion star being a
737: helium-rich brown dwarf \citep{kaaret06}.
738:
739:
740: Because there were no other bursts observed during the {\em INTEGRAL}
741: observation, the burst recurrence time, $\Delta t_{rec}$, must be at
742: least one day. We can compute the ratio of the total energy
743: emitted in the persistent flux to that emitted in the burst
744: $$
745: \alpha= \frac{F_{pers}}{f_b} \Delta t_{rec} = \frac{\gamma}{\tau}
746: \Delta t_{rec} = \frac{0.021}{18.2} \Delta t_{rec} > 100,
747: $$
748: which is consistent with pure helium bursts \citep[see e.g.][]{vh95}.
749: Taking the burst total energy release $E_{b}=5\times 10^{39}$ erg
750: (derived from the fluence $f_b$)
751: and He burning efficiency of $\epsilon_{\rm He}\approx 1.7$ MeV/nucleon $\approx 1.6\times10^{18}$
752: erg g$^{-1}$, we estimated the amount of fuel burned during the burst
753: $E_{b}/\epsilon_{\rm He}\sim3.1\times10^{21}$ g.
754: For the mean mass accretion rate of 2 per cent of the Eddington,
755: a burst recurrence time of 2.2 days is expected.
756:
757:
758: \begin{figure}[ht]
759: \centering
760: \includegraphics[width=1.3\linewidth,angle=-90]{f3.ps}
761: %\vspace{4cm}
762: \caption{A bright X-ray burst detected from HETE~J1900.1--2455. The JEM-X
763: (3--20 keV; upper panel) and IBIS/ISGRI (18--40 keV; lower panel)
764: net light curves are shown (background subtracted). The time bin is
765: 0.5 s for both IBIS/ISGRI and JEM-X light curve. At high energy the
766: burst shows strong evidence of photospheric radius expansion.}
767: \label{fig:lc_burst}
768: \end{figure}
769:
770:
771:
772: \section{Conclusions}
773: \label{sec:conclusions}
774:
775:
776:
777: The science of accreting millisecond pulsars has been carried forward
778: by the high-energy capabilities of INTEGRAL in concert with the
779: timing resolution capabilities of RXTE and the spectral
780: resolution of XMM at low energies. INTEGRAL observations have
781: contributed to our ability to characterize the high energy spectrum of these
782: sources, and to study their interesting time-lag and pulse fraction
783: behavior over a wide energy range, up to $\sim$150 keV.
784:
785: The reason for the lack of coherent pulsations in the persistent emission
786: from LMXBs has been a longstanding open question in X-ray
787: astronomy. For the first time, we are able to observe a system (\hete) known
788: to contain a millisecond period pulsar, which has continued in
789: outburst after its pulsations have disappeared.
790: The transition of \hete\ from an X-ray
791: millisecond pulsar to a persistent LMXB could indicate that
792: there is a population of suppressed X-ray millisecond pulsars among the
793: non-pulsating LMXBs. Detailed observations of this source at the epoch
794: of pulsation supression can help to solving the long-standing issue of
795: missing pulsations in persistent LMXB emission.
796:
797:
798: \section*{Acknowledgments}
799:
800: I am grateful to the INTEGRAL MSP paper collaborators J. Poutanen,
801: E. W. Bonning, L. Kuiper, J. M. Bonnet-Bidaud, A. Goldwurm,
802: W. Hermsen, L. Stella, and L. Titarchuk on the time/phase lag paper.
803:
804: \begin{thebibliography}{}
805:
806: \bibitem[Barret et~al. (2000)]{b00}
807: Barret, D., Olive, J.~F., Boirin, L., Done, C., Skinner,
808: G.~K., \& Grindlay, J.~E. 2000, ApJ, 533, 329
809:
810: \bibitem[Basko \& Sunyaev (1976)]{BS76}
811: Basko, M. M., \& Sunyaev, R.A. 1976, MNRAS, 175, 395
812:
813: \bibitem[Becker \& Wolff (2006)]{BW06}
814: Becker, P. \& Wolff, M. 2006, ApJ, accepted, astro-ph/0609035
815:
816: \bibitem[Chakrabarty et~al. (20003]{Chakrabarty03}
817: Chakrabarty, D. et al., 2003, Nature, 424, 42
818:
819: \bibitem[Cui et al. (1998)]{CMT98}
820: Cui, W., Morgan, E., \& Titarchuk L. 1998, ApJ, 504, 27
821:
822: \bibitem[Falanga et al. (2005a)]{mfa05}
823: Falanga, M., Bonnet-Bidaud, J. M., Poutanen, J., et al. 2005a, A\&A,
824: 436, 647
825:
826: \bibitem[Falanga et al. (2005b)]{mfb05}
827: Falanga, M., Kuiper, L., Poutanen, J., et al. 2005b, A\&A, 444, 15
828:
829: \bibitem[Falanga et al. (2006)]{mf06}
830: Falanga, M., L., Poutanen, J., Bonning, E., W., et al. 2007, A\&A,
831: 464, 1069
832:
833: \bibitem[Falanga \& Titarchuck (2007)]{MFLT06}
834: Falanga, M., Titarchuck, L., 2007, ApJ, 661, 1084
835:
836: \bibitem[Ford (2000)]{Ford00} Ford, E., C., 2000, ApJ, 535, L119
837:
838: \bibitem[Galloway et al. (2005)]{gmm05}
839: Galloway, D. K., Markwardt, C. B., Morgan, E. H., Chakrabarty, D., \&
840: Strohmayer, T. E. 2005, ApJ, 622, L45
841:
842: \bibitem[Galloway et al. (2006)]{gmm06}
843: Galloway, D. K., Morgan, E., H., Krauss H,. M., Kaaret P.,
844: Chakrabarty, D., 2006, ApJL, [arXiv:astro-ph/0609693]
845:
846: \bibitem[Galloway et al. (2006)]{gmh06}
847: Galloway, D., K., Muno, M., P., Hartman, J., M., Savov, P., Psaltis,
848: D., Chakrabarty, D. , 2006, ApJS, [arXiv:astro-ph/0608259]
849:
850: \bibitem[Galloway et al. (2006)]{gc06}
851: Galloway D., K., Cumming, A., 2006, ApJL, in press [arXiv:astro-ph/0607213]
852:
853: \bibitem[Gierli\'nski et al. (2002)]{gdb02}
854: Gierli\'nski, M., Done, C., \& Barret, D. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 141
855:
856: \bibitem[Gierli\'nski \& Poutanen (2005)]{gp05}
857: Gierli\'nski, M., \& Poutanen, J. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1261
858:
859: \bibitem[Kaaret et al. (2006)]{kaaret06}
860: Kaaret, P., Morgan, E. H., Vanderspek, R., \& Tomsick, J. A. 2006,
861: ApJ, 638, 963
862:
863: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al. (1984)]{mitsuda84}
864: Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Koyama, K., et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 741
865:
866: \bibitem[Poutanen \& Svensson (1996)]{ps96}
867: Poutanen, J., \& Svensson, R. 1996, ApJ, 470, 249
868:
869: \bibitem[Poutanen \& Gierli\'nski (2003)]{pg03}
870: Poutanen, J., \& Gierli\'nski, M. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1301
871:
872: \bibitem[Poutanen (2006)]{p06}
873: Poutanen, J. 2006, Adv. Space Res., in press [arXiv:astro-ph/0510038]
874:
875: \bibitem[Strohmayer (2001)]{stroh01}
876: Strohmayer, T. E., 2001, Adv. Space Res., 28, 511
877:
878: \bibitem[Sunyaev \& Titarchuk (1980)]{ST80}
879: Sunyaev, R.A. \& Titarchuk, L.G. 1980, A\&A, 86, 121
880:
881: \bibitem[Titarchuk et al. (2002)]{TCW}
882: Titarchuk, L.G., Cui, W., \& Wood, K.S., 2002, ApJ, 576, L49
883:
884: \bibitem[Verbunt \& van den Heuvel (1995)]{vh95}
885: Verbunt, F., \& van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1995,
886: in X-ray binaries, eds. W. H. G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, \& E. P. J. van
887: den Heuvel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 457
888:
889: \bibitem[Viironen \& Poutanen (2004)]{vp04}
890: Viironen, K., \& Poutanen, J. 2004, A\&A, 426, 985
891:
892: \bibitem[Wijnands \& van der Klis (1998)]{wvdk98}
893: Wijnands, R., \& van der Klis, M. 1998, Nature, 394, 344
894:
895: \bibitem[Wijnands (2005)]{w05}
896: Wijnands, R. 2005, in Pulsars New Research (NY: Nova Science
897: Publishers), in press [astro-ph/0501264]
898:
899:
900: \end{thebibliography}
901: \end{document}
902: %%
903: %% <<<<< End of generated file <<<<<<
904: %%
905: %% End of file `esapub.tex'.
906: