1: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{epsfig}
4: %\usepackage{changebar}
5: %\usepackage{natbib}
6:
7: %\topmargin -0.0in
8:
9: %\def\boldsymbol{\bf}
10:
11: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
12:
13: \slugcomment{Accepted to the ApJL}
14:
15: \shorttitle{Low Luminosity Outflows}
16: \shortauthors{Bussmann et al.}
17:
18: %\usepackage{amsmath}
19: %\usepackage{amssymb}
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{A CO ($J=3-2$) Outflow Survey of the Elias 29 Region}
24:
25: \author{R. S. Bussmann, T. W. Wong, A. S. Hedden, C. K. Kulesa, and C. K. Walker}
26: \affil{Steward Observatory, Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 933
27: N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721}
28: \email{rsbussmann@as.arizona.edu,twong@email.arizona.edu,ahedden@as.arizona.edu}
29: \email{ckulesa@as.arizona.edu,cwalker@as.arizona.edu}
30:
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33:
34: We present a 5$\arcmin \times 5\arcmin$ integrated intensity map of
35: $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) emission from the $\rho$~Ophiuchi cloud core that traces
36: low-luminosity outflow emission from two protostars: Elias~29 and, most likely,
37: LFAM~26. The morphology of the outflow from Elias~29 is bipolar and has a
38: curved axis that traces the S-shaped symmetry seen in H$_2$
39: emission. The outflow from LFAM~26 is a new detection and oriented in the
40: east/west direction near the plane of the sky with most of the blue-shifted
41: emission being absorbed by intervening clouds. The outflow axis of this object
42: also appears to intersect a knot of H$_2$ emission previously attributed to
43: Elias~29. LFAM~26 is a low luminosity source ($L_{bol} =0.06 \: L_\sun$)
44: which, in combination with the observed outflow, makes it a candidate Very Low
45: Luminosity Object (VeLLO). We derive lower limits to the gas column densities
46: and energetics for both outflows. The mechanical luminosities for Elias~29 and
47: LFAM~26 are 6.4 and 10.3 $\times 10^{-3} \: L_\sun$, respectively.
48:
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \keywords{ stars: formation --- stars: outflows --- ISM: clouds --- ISM: jets
52: and outflows --- submillimeter }
53:
54:
55: %\newpage
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58: \label{sec:intro}
59:
60: We present $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) observations towards the (36 $L_\sun$) Class~I
61: protostar Elias~29 ($\alpha = 16^{\rm h}27^{\rm m}09^{\rm s}.5, \;
62: \delta=-24^\circ37\arcmin18\arcsec$ [J2000.0]) located in the $\rho$~Ophiuchi
63: star forming region. The $\rho$-Oph cloud complex is nearby \citep[$d \sim
64: 120\;$pc,][]{2006AAS...20913303L} and has a diverse (proto-)stellar environment
65: that makes it a superb laboratory for studying the impact of molecular outflows
66: on the surrounding environment. The region around Elias~29 is a particularly
67: well-studied component of the cloud complex. Two foreground clouds at $v_{LSR}
68: = 2.7$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ and $v_{LSR} = 3.8$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ account for the
69: presence of cool ice along the line of sight and absorb much of the
70: blue-shifted outflow emission in this region \citep{2002ApJ...570..708B}.
71: Furthermore, \citet{2002ApJ...570..708B} identified a ridge of dense material
72: at $v_{LSR} = 5.0$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ within which both Elias~29 and LFAM~26
73: reside. \citet{2002A&A...395..863C} obtained spectra of the $^{12}$CO~($J=6-5$)
74: transition with the JCMT and the $J \ge 15$ CO levels with the ISO SWS towards
75: Elias~29. These authors found evidence for a super-heated surface disk layer
76: with a temperature and mass similar to that found in Herbig AeBe stars
77: \citep{2001ApJ...561.1074T}, suggesting that Elias~29 may be a deeply embedded
78: Herbig AeBe star or a transition object between the standard Class~I and
79: Class~II types. \citet{1996A&A311..858B} reported the discovery of an outflow
80: around Elias~29 and estimated its momentum rate. A larger map of the region
81: was made in the $^{12}$CO~($J=2-1$) transition by \citet{1997ApJ489L..63S}.
82:
83: In this paper, we present $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) observations that further expand
84: the size of the mapped region and reaffirm the bipolar nature of the outflow,
85: but find that it is more extended than previously thought. Furthermore, the
86: map has sufficient size to identify a previously undiscovered outflow whose
87: source appears to be LFAM~26. First discovered as a radio source
88: \citep{1991apj...379..683L}, LFAM~26 was later identified as a low luminosity
89: ($L_{bol} = 0.064 \: L_\sun$) Class~I protostar based on ISOCAM photometry
90: \citep{2001A&A...372..173B}. The extreme faintness of this source, coupled
91: with the detection of molecular outflows presented in this paper, make it a
92: candidate VeLLO. However, detailed modeling of the infrared SED will be
93: necessary to determine if this object meets the primary criterion of $L_{int} <
94: 0.1 \: L_\sun$.
95:
96: \section{Observations}
97: \label{sec:obs}
98:
99: We made a 5$\arcmin \times 5\arcmin$ $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) On-The-Fly map
100: centered spectrally at 345.795975 GHz and spatially on Elias~29 using the 10m
101: Heinrich Hertz Telescope (HHT) on Mt. Graham, Arizona during April 2001 and
102: January 2006. A 256 channel filterbank spectrometer with 250~kHz resolution
103: was used as the backend in 2001, and two 2048 channel Acousto-Optical
104: Spectrometers (AOS) with 475~kHz resolution were used in 2006. The
105: off-position for both maps was located at a clean offset
106: \citep{2005ApJ625..194K} of $\Delta \alpha = 2.5^\circ, \; \Delta \delta =
107: -0.83^\circ$ from Elias~29. We obtained two rows of data per OFF, translating
108: to $\sim$1 OFF observation per minute for a 10$\arcsec$ per second scan rate.
109: Each row is offset in declination by 10$\arcsec$. At 345~GHz, the half-power
110: telescope beamsize and main beam efficiency were measured to be 22$\arcsec$ and
111: 0.7, respectively. Pointing accuracy of a few arcseconds was maintained by
112: observing planets approximately once per hour. The OTF data grid was convolved
113: with an 11$\arcsec$ beam to obtain a Nyquist-sampled map. System temperatures
114: during the observing run were 500-1500~K. Line strengths were calibrated using
115: hot and cold loads in conjunction with sky measurements at the off position
116: \citep{2001PASP..113..567S}. Calibration uncertainty is estimated to be $\la
117: 20$\%. For both datasets, the main beam temperature ($T_{mb} =
118: T_A^*/\eta_{mb}$) showed a typical rms noise level of 0.7~K . The 2001 data
119: are smoothed in velocity space to match the 0.4~km~s$^{-1}$ bins of the 2006
120: data. The final datacube used in the analysis is an rms-weighted average of
121: the two datasets and has a typical rms noise temperature of $T_{mb} = 0.4$~K.
122:
123: \section{Results}
124: \label{sec:res}
125:
126: \subsection{Outflow Morphology}\label{sec:morph}
127:
128: In Figure~\ref{fig:spectra}, we show spectra located at the driving sources as
129: well as at the approximate peak of the integrated emission intensity in the
130: blue and red lobes of both outflows. The vertical lines demarcate the position
131: in velocity space of intervening absorption clouds along the line of sight at
132: $v_{LSR} = 2.7$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ and $v_{LSR} = 3.8$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$, as well as a
133: ridge of material at $v_{LSR} = 5$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ \citep{2002ApJ...570..708B}.
134: Each of the spectra show signs of significant absorption due to these
135: intervening clouds.
136:
137: Figure~\ref{fig:intensitycontours} shows the integrated intensity map of the
138: blue-shifted (solid contours, $v_{LSR} = -4$ to 1 km~s$^{-1}$) and red-shifted
139: (dashed contours, $v_{LSR} = 7$ to 12 km~s$^{-1}$) outflow emission. The
140: velocity ranges have been chosen to avoid the absorption features from the
141: intervening clouds detected by \citet{2002ApJ...570..708B}. Crosses show the
142: location of Elias~29 and LFAM~26, plus signs indicate the position of infrared
143: sources \citep{1983ApJ274..698W}, squares represent starless cores
144: \citep{1998A&A...336..150M}, and the diamonds show H$_2$ emission knots
145: observed by \citet[feature G2][]{2003AJ....126..863G} and by \citet[features
146: 1-3b][]{2006ApJ...647L.159Y}. Elias~29 is associated with emission towards the
147: north (blue-shifted) and south (red-shifted), consistent with results from
148: previous outflow surveys \citep{1996A&A311..858B,1997ApJ489L..63S} that have
149: suggested a bipolar outflow with a mostly pole-on inclination
150: \citep{1995ApJ...438..250H}.
151:
152: The large scale outflow morphology strongly resembles the S-shaped symmetry
153: observed in H$_2$ emission near the driving source \citep{2006ApJ...647L.159Y},
154: with the blue lobe bending to the northeast and the red lobe bending to the
155: southwest. The solid curve through the peaks of the Elias~29 blue and red
156: lobes represents our best estimate of the outflow axis and is weighted by eye
157: towards the five H$_2$ emission knots labelled as features 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, and
158: 3b \citep{2006ApJ...647L.159Y} in the main panel of
159: Figure~\ref{fig:intensitycontours}. The bottom right inset is reproduced from
160: \citet{2006ApJ...647L.159Y} and shows the structure of the region as seen in
161: H$_2$ emission. Regions $3a$ and $3b$ appear to trace the peak of the
162: red-shifted outflow emission. \citet{2002A&A...395..863C} mapped CO~($J=6-5$)
163: line emission over a $35 \arcsec \times 35 \arcsec$ field centered on Elias~29
164: with an effective beamsize of $12 \arcsec$. Contour maps of their observed
165: wing emission show evidence in support of an east-west outflow axis, consistent
166: with the S-shaped symmetry found by \citet{2006ApJ...647L.159Y} and seen in the
167: central regions of our map. Higher spatial resolution observations will be
168: necessary to explore the detailed morphology of the central region of outflow
169: emission from Elias~29 and provide a more precise comparison with the known
170: H$_2$ regions.
171:
172: In addition to the well-studied outflow from Elias~29, we report a new outflow
173: whose source appears to be LFAM~26, a Class~I protostar
174: \citep{1994ApJ...434..614G,2001A&A...372..173B} located $\sim$1$\arcmin$
175: northwest of Elias~29. The morphology of this outflow---with lobes to the east
176: and west both showing significant red-shifted emission---suggests that its axis
177: lies near the plane of the sky, as shown by the solid line in
178: Figure~\ref{fig:intensitycontours}. The relatively low level of blue-shifted
179: emission from this outflow is most likely due to the presence of the foreground
180: absorbing clouds at $v_{LSR} = 2.7$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ and $v_{LSR} =
181: 3.8$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ \citep{2002ApJ...570..708B}. In particular, the $v_{LSR} =
182: 2.7$~km$\:$s$^{-1}$ cloud is roughly spatially coincident with the eastern lobe
183: of the LFAM~26 outflow. H$_2$ emission detected within the contours of the
184: integrated emission intensity to the east \citep{2004AAS...20513604Y} lends
185: further support to the notion of LFAM~26 as the driving source. The outflow
186: axis as drawn lies nearly a full beamwidth away from [GSWC2003]~2, a knot of
187: H$_2$ emission detected by \citet{2003AJ....126..863G}. These authors
188: attributed the H$_2$ knot to the Elias~29 outflow, but in our CO~($J=3-2$) wing
189: map, the western lobe of the LFAM~26 outflow appears to lie between LFAM~26 and
190: [GSWC2003]~2, suggesting that LFAM~26 is a more likely candidate than Elias~29
191: to be the powering source of the H$_2$ knot.
192:
193: It must be kept in mind that this is a particularly dense region of $\rho$-Oph
194: which makes the association of outflows with their driving sources particularly
195: problematic. For this reason, additional evidence linking LFAM~26 and the
196: observed outflows is desirable. This evidence comes in the form of nebulous
197: emission seen in deep NIR imaging of LFAM~26 that has a distinct hourglass
198: shape---shown in the top right inset of Figure~\ref{fig:intensitycontours}
199: \citep[taken from Fig.~4 in][]{2004A&A...427..651D}---with the nebulosity
200: extending a few arcseconds away on either side of the central source. The
201: orientation of the hourglass roughly coincides with the $\sim$100$^\circ$
202: outflow position angle we estimated above, serving as further evidence that
203: LFAM~26 is the powering source of the observed outflow. The hourglass shape
204: around LFAM~26 is consistent with the presence of an edge-on accretion disk.
205: Whether or not LFAM~26 qualifies as a VeLLO must await detailed modeling of its
206: IR SED, a task which is beyond the scope of this letter.
207:
208: It should be noted that the integrated emission intensity peaks do not appear
209: to lie directly on the outflow axis as shown in
210: Figure~\ref{fig:intensitycontours}. Due to the masking effect of foreground
211: clouds, the redshifted emission components alone may not accurately portray the
212: east-west spatial centroids of the outflow. Nevertheless, let us consider the
213: possibility of alternative driving source(s). First, the object closest to
214: LFAM~26 is E-MM3, located $\sim$15$\arcsec$ east and $\sim$30$\arcsec$ south of
215: LFAM~26. This object was first labelled as a starless core
216: \citep{1998A&A...336..150M}, but subsequent VLT H and Ks observations showed a
217: bipolar reflection nebulosity surrounding it in much the same manner as LFAM~26
218: \citep{2000A&A...364L..13B}. However, the orientation of this reflection
219: nebula is closer to north/south than east/west and is therefore an unlikely
220: candidate for the driving source. Another possibility is that each of the
221: outflows is driven by one of the other embedded objects either in this region
222: (e.g. E-MM4 or E-MM5) or beyond. Given the highly obscured, complex structure
223: of the region, this scenario is plausible. Finally, it is conceivable that
224: Elias~29 is a binary system, with the other object producing the observed
225: outflow. However, numerous searches using a wide variety of techniques from
226: lunar occultations \citep{1995ApJ...443..625S} to deep NIR imaging
227: \citep{2004A&A...427..651D} have found no evidence for a companion.
228:
229: \subsection{Outflow Energetics}\label{sec:energetics}
230:
231: Physical parameters of each outflow are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:results}.
232: From the integrated intensity map, we estimate the maximum radius ($R_{max}$)
233: and area ($A$) of each outflow lobe centered on the position of peak flux.
234: Here the characteristic velocity of each outflow, $v_{char}$, is the maximum
235: outflow velocity detected in the associated $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) spectra, $\sim
236: 8 \: {\rm km \: s}^{-1}$. The dynamical timescale is $t_d = R_{max}/v_{char}$.
237: We assume the wings of the $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) emission are optically thin, so
238: the values in Table~\ref{tab:results} represent lower limits to the actual
239: values. As mentioned in Section~\ref{sec:morph}, however, there is evidence of
240: strong absorption of the blue-shifted outflow emission from LFAM~26 due to the
241: presence of foreground absorption clouds. Furthermore, the measured
242: radial velocity underestimates the characteristic velocity by a factor of
243: $1/sin(i)$, where $i$ is the inclination angle. If the outflow axis of LFAM~26
244: is near the plane of the sky, then $i$ approaches 0$^\circ$ and the correction
245: factor can increase significantly.
246:
247: From the peak main beam temperature in the $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) spectrum, we
248: estimate $T_{ex} = 25\:$K. While $T_{ex}$ is not constant across the map, the
249: variations are small and do not significantly affect the results. For
250: instance, if we assume a $T_{ex}$ that is smaller by a factor of 2, we find
251: average column densities that are roughly a factor of 2 larger. The total CO
252: column density, $N_T$, is calculated from \citet{2005ApJ625..194K} under the
253: assumption of LTE. Assuming dark cloud abundances of [H$_2$]/[CO]$=1 \times
254: 10^4$, we estimate the mass of each outflow lobe to be $M_{OF} =
255: ([$H$_2$/[CO])$N_T$$A \mu_g m_{{\rm H}_2}$, where $\mu_g$ is the mean atomic
256: weight of the gas, 1.36 \citep{1997ApJ489L..63S}. The mass outflow rate is
257: $\dot{M}_{OF} = M_{OF} / t_d$, the outflow momentum is $P_{OF}=M_{OF}v_{char}$
258: and the outflow force is $F_{OF} = p_{OF}/t_d$. The mechanical luminosity is
259: estimated as $L_m = \frac{1}{2}M_{OF}v_{OF}^2 / t_d$. The outflow to infall
260: conversion efficiency is $\epsilon = \dot{M}_{OF} / \dot{M}_{accr}$.
261:
262: \citet{1997ApJ489L..63S} and \citet{1996A&A311..858B} have obtained integrated
263: intensity $^{12}$CO~($J=2-1$) emission maps centered on Elias~29. The
264: $^{12}$CO~($J= 3-2$) map shown here represents a significant enlargement of the
265: surveyed area. Inside the mapped region, we find a larger radius for the blue
266: lobe of Elias~29---0.058~pc compared to 0.024~pc in \citet{1997ApJ489L..63S}.
267: We also find an average column density over the Elias~29 outflow that is a
268: factor of $\sim$$2-3$ lower than observed in $^{12}$CO~($J=2-1$). The
269: difference in column density estimates may be due to the $^{12}$CO~($3-2$) wing
270: emission being optically thick. Our optically thin assumption would then
271: underestimate the true column density by a factor of $\tau/(1-e^{-\tau})$. Due
272: to the extended size of the outflow region, the $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) derived
273: outflow mass is comparable to that of \citet{1997ApJ489L..63S}. The outflow
274: energetics are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:results}. The low values of the
275: energetic parameters associated with Elias 29 suggest it is near the end of its
276: outflow/accretion phase, consistent with the findings of
277: \citet{2002A&A...395..863C}.
278:
279: \section{Summary}\label{sec:summary}
280:
281: We present a 25 square arcminute map of $^{12}$CO~($J=3-2$) outflow emission
282: centered on Elias~29. In the map, we see evidence suggesting the Elias~29
283: outflow is bipolar and has a curved flow that traces the same structure seen in
284: H$_2$ line emission. We report the first detection of a molecular outflow from
285: LFAM~26, an object whose low luminosity makes it a candidate VeLLO. While the
286: high density of protostellar objects in this region produces a complicated
287: outflow structure that makes associating outflows with their driving sources
288: somewhat problematic, we conclude LFAM~26 is the most likely driving source.
289: Both the molecular outflow and the NIR scattered light cavity morphology
290: suggests the associated outflow axis lies near the plane of the sky, in which
291: case we are viewing the protostar through an edge-on accretion disk. We
292: calculate lower limits on the mechanical luminosity of the outflows from
293: Elias~29 and LFAM~26 to be 6.4 and 10.3~$ \times 10^{-3} L_\sun$, respectively.
294: The low value of $L_m$ for Elias 29 suggests this object is near the end of its
295: outflow/accretion phase of evolution.
296:
297: We wish to acknowledge the comments of the referee which were very helpful
298: in refining the paper.
299:
300: \begin{thebibliography}{20}
301: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
302:
303: \bibitem[{{Bontemps} {et~al.}(2001){Bontemps}, {Andr{\'e}}, {Kaas}, {Nordh},
304: {Olofsson}, {Huldtgren}, {Abergel}, {Blommaert}, {Boulanger}, {Burgdorf},
305: {Cesarsky}, {Cesarsky}, {Copet}, {Davies}, {Falgarone}, {Lagache},
306: {Montmerle}, {P{\'e}rault}, {Persi}, {Prusti}, {Puget}, \&
307: {Sibille}}]{2001A&A...372..173B}
308: {Bontemps}, S., {Andr{\'e}}, P., {Kaas}, A.~A., {Nordh}, L., {Olofsson}, G.,
309: {Huldtgren}, M., {Abergel}, A., {Blommaert}, J., {Boulanger}, F., {Burgdorf},
310: M., {Cesarsky}, C.~J., {Cesarsky}, D., {Copet}, E., {Davies}, J.,
311: {Falgarone}, E., {Lagache}, G., {Montmerle}, T., {P{\'e}rault}, M., {Persi},
312: P., {Prusti}, T., {Puget}, J.~L., \& {Sibille}, F. 2001, \aap, 372, 173
313:
314: \bibitem[{{Bontemps} {et~al.}(1996){Bontemps}, {Andre}, {Terebey}, \&
315: {Cabrit}}]{1996A&A311..858B}
316: {Bontemps}, S., {Andre}, P., {Terebey}, S., \& {Cabrit}, S. 1996, \aap, 311,
317: 858
318:
319: \bibitem[{{Boogert} {et~al.}(2002){Boogert}, {Hogerheijde}, {Ceccarelli},
320: {Tielens}, {van Dishoeck}, {Blake}, {Latter}, \&
321: {Motte}}]{2002ApJ...570..708B}
322: {Boogert}, A.~C.~A., {Hogerheijde}, M.~R., {Ceccarelli}, C., {Tielens},
323: A.~G.~G.~M., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., {Blake}, G.~A., {Latter}, W.~B., \&
324: {Motte}, F. 2002, \apj, 570, 708
325:
326: \bibitem[{{Brandner} {et~al.}(2000){Brandner}, {Sheppard}, {Zinnecker},
327: {Close}, {Iwamuro}, {Krabbe}, {Maihara}, {Motohara}, {Padgett}, \&
328: {Tokunaga}}]{2000A&A...364L..13B}
329: {Brandner}, W., {Sheppard}, S., {Zinnecker}, H., {Close}, L., {Iwamuro}, F.,
330: {Krabbe}, A., {Maihara}, T., {Motohara}, K., {Padgett}, D.~L., \& {Tokunaga},
331: A. 2000, \aap, 364, L13
332:
333: \bibitem[{{Ceccarelli} {et~al.}(2002){Ceccarelli}, {Boogert}, {Tielens},
334: {Caux}, {Hogerheijde}, \& {Parise}}]{2002A&A...395..863C}
335: {Ceccarelli}, C., {Boogert}, A.~C.~A., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., {Caux}, E.,
336: {Hogerheijde}, M.~R., \& {Parise}, B. 2002, \aap, 395, 863
337:
338: \bibitem[{{Duch{\^e}ne} {et~al.}(2004){Duch{\^e}ne}, {Bouvier}, {Bontemps},
339: {Andr{\'e}}, \& {Motte}}]{2004A&A...427..651D}
340: {Duch{\^e}ne}, G., {Bouvier}, J., {Bontemps}, S., {Andr{\'e}}, P., \& {Motte},
341: F. 2004, \aap, 427, 651
342:
343: \bibitem[{{G{\'o}mez} {et~al.}(2003){G{\'o}mez}, {Stark}, {Whitney}, \&
344: {Churchwell}}]{2003AJ....126..863G}
345: {G{\'o}mez}, M., {Stark}, D.~P., {Whitney}, B.~A., \& {Churchwell}, E. 2003,
346: \aj, 126, 863
347:
348: \bibitem[{{Greene} {et~al.}(1994){Greene}, {Wilking}, {Andre}, {Young}, \&
349: {Lada}}]{1994ApJ...434..614G}
350: {Greene}, T.~P., {Wilking}, B.~A., {Andre}, P., {Young}, E.~T., \& {Lada},
351: C.~J. 1994, \apj, 434, 614
352:
353: \bibitem[{{Hanner} {et~al.}(1995){Hanner}, {Brooke}, \&
354: {Tokunaga}}]{1995ApJ...438..250H}
355: {Hanner}, M.~S., {Brooke}, T.~Y., \& {Tokunaga}, A.~T. 1995, \apj, 438, 250
356:
357: \bibitem[{{Kulesa} {et~al.}(2005){Kulesa}, {Hungerford}, {Walker}, {Zhang}, \&
358: {Lane}}]{2005ApJ625..194K}
359: {Kulesa}, C.~A., {Hungerford}, A.~L., {Walker}, C.~K., {Zhang}, X., \& {Lane},
360: A.~P. 2005, \apj, 625, 194
361:
362: \bibitem[{{Leous} {et~al.}(1991){Leous}, {Feigelson}, {Andre}, \&
363: {Montmerle}}]{1991apj...379..683L}
364: {Leous}, J.~A., {Feigelson}, E.~D., {Andre}, P., \& {Montmerle}, T. 1991, \apj,
365: 379, 683
366:
367: \bibitem[{{Loinard}(2006)}]{2006AAS...20913303L}
368: {Loinard}, L. 2006, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts,
369: 133.03--+
370:
371: \bibitem[{{Motte} {et~al.}(1998){Motte}, {Andre}, \&
372: {Neri}}]{1998A&A...336..150M}
373: {Motte}, F., {Andre}, P., \& {Neri}, R. 1998, \aap, 336, 150
374:
375: \bibitem[{{Sekimoto} {et~al.}(1997){Sekimoto}, {Tatematsu}, {Umemoto},
376: {Koyama}, {Tsuboi}, {Hirano}, \& {Yamamoto}}]{1997ApJ489L..63S}
377: {Sekimoto}, Y., {Tatematsu}, K., {Umemoto}, T., {Koyama}, K., {Tsuboi}, Y.,
378: {Hirano}, N., \& {Yamamoto}, S. 1997, \apjl, 489, L63+
379:
380: \bibitem[{{Simon} {et~al.}(1995){Simon}, {Ghez}, {Leinert}, {Cassar}, {Chen},
381: {Howell}, {Jameson}, {Matthews}, {Neugebauer}, \&
382: {Richichi}}]{1995ApJ...443..625S}
383: {Simon}, M., {Ghez}, A.~M., {Leinert}, C., {Cassar}, L., {Chen}, W.~P.,
384: {Howell}, R.~R., {Jameson}, R.~F., {Matthews}, K., {Neugebauer}, G., \&
385: {Richichi}, A. 1995, \apj, 443, 625
386:
387: \bibitem[{{Stark} {et~al.}(2001){Stark}, {Bally}, {Balm}, {Bania}, {Bolatto},
388: {Chamberlin}, {Engargiola}, {Huang}, {Ingalls}, {Jacobs}, {Jackson}, {Kooi},
389: {Lane}, {Lo}, {Marks}, {Martin}, {Mumma}, {Ojha}, {Schieder}, {Staguhn},
390: {Stutzki}, {Walker}, {Wilson}, {Wright}, {Zhang}, {Zimmermann}, \&
391: {Zimmermann}}]{2001PASP..113..567S}
392: {Stark}, A.~A., {Bally}, J., {Balm}, S.~P., {Bania}, T.~M., {Bolatto}, A.~D.,
393: {Chamberlin}, R.~A., {Engargiola}, G., {Huang}, M., {Ingalls}, J.~G.,
394: {Jacobs}, K., {Jackson}, J.~M., {Kooi}, J.~W., {Lane}, A.~P., {Lo}, K.-Y.,
395: {Marks}, R.~D., {Martin}, C.~L., {Mumma}, D., {Ojha}, R., {Schieder}, R.,
396: {Staguhn}, J., {Stutzki}, J., {Walker}, C.~K., {Wilson}, R.~W., {Wright},
397: G.~A., {Zhang}, X., {Zimmermann}, P., \& {Zimmermann}, R. 2001, \pasp, 113,
398: 567
399:
400: \bibitem[{{Thi} {et~al.}(2001){Thi}, {van Dishoeck}, {Blake}, {van Zadelhoff},
401: {Horn}, {Becklin}, {Mannings}, {Sargent}, {van den Ancker}, {Natta}, \&
402: {Kessler}}]{2001ApJ...561.1074T}
403: {Thi}, W.~F., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., {Blake}, G.~A., {van Zadelhoff}, G.~J.,
404: {Horn}, J., {Becklin}, E.~E., {Mannings}, V., {Sargent}, A.~I., {van den
405: Ancker}, M.~E., {Natta}, A., \& {Kessler}, J. 2001, \apj, 561, 1074
406:
407: \bibitem[{{Wilking} \& {Lada}(1983)}]{1983ApJ274..698W}
408: {Wilking}, B.~A. \& {Lada}, C.~J. 1983, \apj, 274, 698
409:
410: \bibitem[{{Ybarra} \& {Barsony}(2004)}]{2004AAS...20513604Y}
411: {Ybarra}, J.~E. \& {Barsony}, M. 2004, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical
412: Society, 1568--+
413:
414: \bibitem[{{Ybarra} {et~al.}(2006){Ybarra}, {Barsony}, {Haisch}, {Jarrett},
415: {Sahai}, \& {Weinberger}}]{2006ApJ...647L.159Y}
416: {Ybarra}, J.~E., {Barsony}, M., {Haisch}, Jr., K.~E., {Jarrett}, T.~H.,
417: {Sahai}, R., \& {Weinberger}, A.~J. 2006, \apjl, 647, L159
418:
419: \end{thebibliography}
420:
421: \clearpage
422:
423: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
424: \tablecolumns{3}
425: \tablewidth{260pt}
426: \tablecaption{Parameters of Detected Sources}
427: \tablehead{
428: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Elias~29} & \colhead{LFAM~26}
429: }
430: \startdata
431: $R_{max}$ (pc) & 0.058 & 0.064 \\
432: $t_{d}$ ($10^3\:$yr) & 7.1 & 7.8 \\
433: $<$$N_{CO}$$>$ ($10^{15}\:$cm$^{-2}$) & 3.6 & 3.3 \\
434: $A_{OF}$ (sq. arcsec) & 5100 & 6600 \\
435: $M_{OF}$ ($10^{-3} M_\sun$) & 8.7 & 15.2 \\
436: $\dot{M}_{OF}$ ($10^{-6} M_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$) & 1.2 & 1.9 \\
437: $\epsilon$ ($\dot{M}_{OF}/\dot{M}_{accr}$) & 0.15 & 0.25 \\
438: $P_{OF}$ ($10^{-3} \: M_\sun \:$km$\:$s$^{-1}$) & 69 & 121 \\
439: $F_{OF}$ ($10^{-6} \: M_\sun \:$km$\:$s$^{-1}$ ) & 9.8 & 15.6 \\
440: $L_{m}$ ($10^{-3} \: L_\sun$) & 6.4 & 10.3 \\
441: \enddata
442: \label{tab:results}
443: \end{deluxetable}
444:
445: \clearpage
446:
447: \begin{figure}
448: \plotone{f1.eps}
449: \caption{Spectra of Elias~29 and LFAM~26 in addition to their respective
450: outflows. The spatial offsets from the driving sources are given below each
451: spectrum (north and east are positive). LFAM~26 is offset from Elias~29 by
452: (-60$\arcsec$, 44$\arcsec$). Dotted lines indicate the velocity of intervening
453: absorption clouds at $v_{LSR} = 2.7$ and $v_{LSR} = 3.8$~${\rm km \: s}^{-1}$
454: as well as an absorption ridge at $v_{LSR} = 5.0$~${\rm km \: s}^{-1}$ detected
455: by \citet{2002ApJ...570..708B}. The spectra have been shifted in intensity by
456: 15~K.} \label{fig:spectra}
457: \end{figure}
458:
459: \clearpage
460:
461: \begin{figure}
462: \epsscale{0.90}
463: \plotone{f2.eps}
464: \caption{Integrated intensity map of the blue-shifted (solid contours, $v_{LSR}
465: = -4$ to 1 km~s${^-1}$) and the red-shifted (dashed contours, $v_{LSR} = 7$ to
466: 12 km$\:$s$^{-1}$) outflow emission centered on Elias~29. Lowest contour shown
467: represents $3\sigma$, steps are in units of $2\sigma$. $\sigma_{bw} =
468: \sigma_{rw} = 1.4 \:$K$\,$km$\:$s$^{-1}$. Crosses show the location of
469: Elias~29 and LFAM~26, plus signs indicate the position of infrared sources
470: \citep{1983ApJ274..698W}, squares represent starless cores
471: \citep{1998A&A...336..150M}, and diamonds show H$_2$ emission knots from
472: \citet{2003AJ....126..863G} and \citet{2006ApJ...647L.159Y}. A solid line
473: intersecting LFAM~26 is drawn to indicate the $\sim$100$^\circ$ position angle
474: of the LFAM~26 outflow and is reproduced in the top right inset, which shows
475: continuum H$_2$ emission from LFAM~26 \citep{2004A&A...427..651D}. This line
476: is nearly a beamwidth away from [GSWC2003]~2 (designated G~2 in the figure), an
477: H$_2$ emission feature detected by \citet{2003AJ....126..863G}. A solid curve
478: through the peaks of the Elias~29 outflow lobes indicates the S-shaped symmetry
479: of the outflow and is weighted by eye to trace the H$_2$ emission from
480: \citep{2006ApJ...647L.159Y}. The bottom right inset shows H$_2$ emission and a
481: 10$\sigma$ contour of continuum emission detected in the narrowband H$_2$
482: filter used for the observations. The physical scale is shown in the inset
483: \citep{2006ApJ...647L.159Y}. The 22$\arcsec$ FWHM beam is shown in the top
484: left corner. } \label{fig:intensitycontours}
485:
486: \end{figure}
487:
488: \end{document}
489: