1: \documentstyle{pasj06}
2: %\draft
3: \SetRunningHead{S.Oizumi et al.}{Photometry of V844 Her}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{Long-term monitoring of the short period SU UMa-type dwarf nova,
7: V844 Herculis}
8:
9: \author{Shota \textsc{Oizumi}, Toshihiro \textsc{Omodaka}, Hiroyuki
10: \textsc{Yamamoto}, Shunsuke \textsc{Tanada},\\ Tatsuki \textsc{Yasuda},
11: Yoshihiro \textsc{Arao}, Kie \textsc{Kodama}, Miho \textsc{Suzuki},
12: Takeshi \textsc{Matsuo}}
13: \affil{Faculty of Science, Kagoshima University,1-21-30 Korimoto,
14: Kagoshima 890-0065}
15: \email{oizumi@astro.sci.kagoshima-u.ac.jp}
16:
17: \author{Hiroyuki \textsc{Maehara}}
18: \affil{VSOLJ, Namiki 1-13-4,Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0034}
19:
20: \author{Kazuhiro \textsc{Nakajima}}
21: \affil{VSOLJ, 124 Isatotyo, Teradani, Kumano, Mie 519-4673}
22:
23: \author{Pavol A. \textsc{Dubovsky}}
24: \affil{Slovak Association of Amateur Astronomers, Podbiel, Slovakia}
25:
26: \author{Taichi \textsc{Kato}, Akira \textsc{Imada}, Kaori
27: \textsc{Kubota}, Kei \textsc{Sugiyasu}}
28: \affil{Department of Astronomy, Faculty of Science, Kyoto University,
29: Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502}
30:
31: \author{Koichi \textsc{Morikawa}}
32: \affil{468-3 Satoyamada, Yakage-cho, Oda-gun, Okayama 714-1213}
33:
34: \author{Ken'ichi \textsc{Torii}}
35: \affil{Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of
36: Science, \\ Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043}
37:
38: \author{Makoto \textsc{Uemura}}
39: \affil{Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University,
40: Higashi-Hiroshima,\\ Hiroshima 739-8526}
41:
42: \author{Ryoko \textsc{Ishioka}}
43: \affil{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 650
44: North A'ohoku Place,\\ Hilo, HI 96720, USA}
45:
46: \author{Kenji \textsc{Tanabe}}
47: \affil{Department of Biosphere-Geosphere Systems, Faculty of
48: Informatics, Okayama University of Science,\\ 1-1 Ridai-cho, Okayama,
49: Okayama 700-0005 }
50:
51: \and
52: \author{Daisaku \textsc{Nogami}}
53: \affil{Hida Observatory, Kyoto University, Kamitakara, Gifu 506-1314}
54:
55: \KeyWords{
56: accretion, accretion disks
57: --- stars: dwarf novae
58: --- stars: individual (V844 Herculis)
59: --- stars: novae, cataclysmic variables
60: --- stars: oscillations
61: }
62:
63: \maketitle
64:
65: \begin{abstract}
66:
67: We report on time-resolved CCD photometry of four outbursts of a
68: short-period SU UMa-type dwarf nova, V844 Herculis. We successfully
69: determined the mean superhump periods to be 0.05584(64) days, and
70: 0.055883(3) for the 2002 May superoutburst, and the 2006 April-May
71: superoutburst, respectively. During the 2002 October observations, we
72: confirmed that the outburst is a normal outburst, which is the first
73: recorded normal outburst in V844 Her. We also examined superhump period
74: changes during 2002 May and 2006 April-May superoutbursts, both of
75: which showed increasing superhump period over the course of the plateau
76: stage. In order to examine the long-term behavior of V844 Her, we
77: analyzed archival data over the past ten years since the discovery of
78: this binary. Although photometry is not satisfactory in some
79: superoutbursts, we found that V844 Her showed no precursors and
80: rebrightenings. Based on the long-term light curve, we further
81: confirmed V844 Her has shown almost no normal outbursts despite the
82: fact that the supercycle of the system is estimated to be about 300
83: days. In order to explain the long-term light curves of V844 Her,
84: evaporation in the accretion disk may play a role in the avoidance of
85: several normal outbursts, which does not contradict with the relatively
86: large X-ray luminosity of V844 Her.
87:
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90:
91: \section{Introduction}
92:
93: Dwarf novae belong to a subclass of cataclysmic variable stars
94: that consist of a white dwarf (primary) and a late-type star
95: (secondary). The secondary star fills its Roche lobe and transfers mass
96: to the primary via inner Lagragian point (L1) and the transferred matter
97: forms an accretion disk (for a review, see \cite{war95book};
98: \cite{osa96review}; \cite{hel01book}). Among dwarf novae, there exist
99: three subtypes based on their light curves. SU UMa-type dwarf novae,
100: whose orbital period are shorter than 0.1 days in the most cases, are
101: one of the subtypes, characteristic of exhibiting two types of
102: outbursts. One is normal outburst, continuing for a few days. The other
103: is superoutburst, lasting about two weeks, during which modulations
104: called superhumps are shown. The period of the superhumps are a few
105: percent longer than that of the orbital period of the system. This is
106: well explained by a phase-dependent dissipation of a tidally deformed
107: precessing accretion disk. The most acceptable model for SU UMa stars is
108: the thermal-tidal instability model developed by \citet{osa89suuma},
109: well reproducing the majority of observations.
110:
111: V844 Her was discovered by \citet{ant96newvar} as a variable star near
112: ${\eta}$ Her. \citet{ant96newvar} classified the variable, originally named
113: Var 43 Her, as a dwarf nova based on the detection of a long
114: outburst. The light curve in \citet{ant96newvar} is reminiscent of a
115: superoutburst of SU UMa-type dwarf novae. Time-resolved CCD photometry
116: was performed by \citet{kat00v844her} during the 1999 September outburst
117: of V844 Her. Detecting superhumps with a period of 0.05592(2) days, they
118: firstly confirmed the SU UMa nature of V844 Her. By radial velocity
119: studies \citet{tho02gwlibv844herdiuma} determined 0.054643(7) days
120: (78.69 min) as the orbital period of the system. These results indicate
121: that V844 Her is one of the shortest periods among dwarf novae ever
122: known. In order to thoroughly investigate the short period system, the
123: VSNET \citep{kat04vsnet} has placed V844 Her as one of the highest
124: priorities since the confirmation of the SU UMa nature of the system. In
125: 2002 May, 2002 October, and 2003 October, V844 Her underwent an outburst
126: and the VSNET Collaboration Team detected superhumps during these
127: superoutbursts.
128:
129: On 2006 April 24, Pavol A. Dubovsky reported a brightening of V844 Her
130: (12.4 mag) to the VSNET ([vsnet-alert 8914]). Thanks to this prompt
131: report, as well as the seasonal condition of V844 Her (the precise
132: coordinate is RA: $16^{\rm h} 25^{\rm m} 01^{\rm s}.75$, Dec:
133: $+39^{\circ} 09' 26''.4$, \cite{2006ApJS..162...38A}), we firstly
134: succeeded in observing almost the whole superoutburst of V844 Her. The
135: object is identical with USNO A2.0 1275-8931436 ($B$ = 16.9, $R$ =
136: 16.2). The infrared counterpart of the binary is 2MASS J16250181+3909258
137: (\cite{hoa02CV2MASS}; \cite{ima06j0137}). V844 Her is also catalogued as
138: a bright X-ray source by ROSAT, 1RXS J162501.2+390924
139: \citep{1999A&A...349..389V}.
140:
141: \section{Observations}
142:
143: Time-resolved CCD photometry during outburst was performed from 2002 May
144: 20 to 2006 May 20 using 10-100 cm telescopes at 8 sites. The log of
145: these observations is summarized in table 1. Details of observers are
146: listed in table 2. In total, we
147: observed V844 Her for 31 nights, during which 4 outbursts including one
148: normal outburst were detected. The exposure time was 10-40 seconds. The
149: read-out time was typically a few seconds. The resultant cadence is much
150: shorter than the time scale of variations that we focus on. Photometric
151: data were obtained through the $V$ filter at the Kolonica Saddle
152: site. The other sites used no filter, which makes the effective
153: wavelength close to that of $R_{\rm c}$-system. The total data points
154: amounted to 14674, which is the largest data ever obtained for V844 Her.
155:
156: After subtracting a dark-current image from the original CCD frames,
157: flat fielding was performed as the usual manner. The images obtained by
158: Mhh and KU were processed by the task apphot in IRAF.\footnote{IRAF
159: (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is distributed by National
160: Optical Observatories, which is operated by the Association of
161: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
162: agreement with National Science Foundation.} Kyoto, OUS, RIKEN, and
163: Okayama data were analyzed by aperture photometry using a Java-based
164: software developed by one of the authors (TK). Data of Mie were analyzed
165: using
166: FitsPhot4.1.\footnote{http://www.geocities.jp/nagai\_kazuo/dload-1.html}
167: The Maxim DL\footnote{http://www.cyanogen.com/products/maxim\_main.htm}
168: and the
169: C$-$MUNIPACK\footnote{http://integral.physics.muni.cz/cmunipack/} were
170: used for data obtained at Kolonica Saddle. After correcting systematic
171: differences between sites, the magnitude was adjusted to that of Kyoto
172: system except for 2006 observations, for which the magnitude was
173: adjusted to that of Saitama system. As comparison stars, USNO A2.0
174: 1275-8932542 (RA: $16^{\rm h} 25^{\rm m} 13^{\rm s}.25$, Dec:
175: $+39^{\circ} 08' 52''.2$, $V$=12.836, $B-V$=0.994) and USNO-A2.0
176: 1292-0262723 (RA: $16^{\rm h} 24^{\rm m} 51^{\rm s}.25$, Dec:
177: $+39^{\circ} 12' 07''.6$, $V$=12.334, $B-V$=0.662) were used for Kyoto
178: and Saitama system, respectively
179: \citep{hen97sequence}.\footnote{ftp://ftp.aavso.org/public/calib/.},
180: whose constancy was checked by the local stars in the same
181: images. Heliocentric correction was applied to the observation times
182: before the following analyses.
183:
184:
185: \section{Results}
186:
187: \subsection{2002 May outburst}
188:
189: The light curve during the 2002 May outburst is presented in figure
190: \ref{fig:0205lc}. The magnitude declined linearly at the rate of 0.13(1)
191: mag d$^{-1}$ until HJD 2452420, after which the system kept almost
192: constant magnitude until the end of our run. Such a halt is sometimes
193: observed in other SU UMa-type dwarf novae (e.g., V1028 Cyg,
194: \cite{bab00v1028cyg}. For a comprehensive review, see
195: \cite{kat03hodel}). On HJD 2452425, 12 days after the detection of the
196: outburst, V844 Her likely entered the rapid decline stage, when the
197: visual magnitude was fainter than 15.
198:
199: Figure \ref{fig:0205mhp} shows the representative light curves during
200: the plateau phase after removing daily decline trends for each
201: run. Rapid rises and slow declines, characteristic of superhumps, are
202: visible. In order to estimate the superhump period, we applied the phase
203: dispersion minimization (PDM, \cite{ste78pdm}) method to the prewhitened
204: light curves during the plateau stage. We determined 0.05584(64)d as
205: being the best estimated period of the superhump. The error of the
206: resulting period was estimated using the Lafter$-$Kinman class of
207: methods as applied by \citet{fer89error}. The obtained superhump period
208: was in good agreement with the previous studies (\cite{kat00v844her};
209: \cite{tho02gwlibv844herdiuma}).
210:
211: We extracted the maximum times of superhumps calibrated mainly by
212: eye. Table \ref{tbl:02o-c} shows the timings of the superhump maxima. A
213: linear regression to the observed times yields the ephemeris in the
214: following equation:
215:
216: \begin{equation}
217: \mathrm{HJD(max)} = 2452415.0424(15) + 0.055857(23) \times E,
218: \label{eqn:02hjdmax}
219: \end{equation}
220:
221: where $E$ is the cycle count of the maximum timings of superhumps, and
222: the values within the parentheses in the right side of the equation
223: denote 1-$\sigma$ error, respectively. Using the above equation, we
224: derived the $O - C$ diagram illustrated in figure \ref{fig:0205o-c}, in
225: which the dashed line means the best fitting quadratic equation as
226: follows:
227:
228: \begin{eqnarray}
229: O - C = &1.52(0.99) \times 10^{-3} - 1.37(0.40) \times 10^{-4} \times
230: E\nonumber\\\
231: &+ 1.24(0.34) \times 10^{-6} \times E^{2}.
232: \label{eqn:02o-c}
233: \end{eqnarray}
234:
235: The quadratic term yields $P_{\rm dot}$ = $\dot{P}$/$P$ =
236: 4.4(1.2)${\times}$10$^{-5}$, indicating that superhump period increases
237: through the superoutburst. Because of the apparent sparse data listed in
238: table \ref{tbl:02o-c}, it is likely that the obtained value might
239: include large uncertainty. Nevertheless, we can conclude the conspicuous
240: increase in the superhump period during the plateau stage.
241:
242: \subsection{2002 October outburst}
243:
244: Figure \ref{fig:0210lc} shows the light curve of our run during the 2002
245: October outburst. The outburst was caught on HJD 2452571, when the
246: visual magnitude of V844 Her was about 12.5. Our observations started
247: one night after the detection, when the mean magnitude was about
248: 13.3. Using the data obtained on the first two nights, we determined the
249: mean decline rate to be 1.20(1) mag d$^{-1}$. The value is large for the
250: plateau stage of a superoutburst in SU UMa-type dwarf novae. On HJD
251: 2452575, V844 Her faded to 17 mag, which is almost the same as that of
252: the quiescent magnitude. Based on the negative observation on HJD
253: 2452570, we can estimate that the duration of the outburst was at most
254: 5 days.
255:
256: Figure \ref{fig:0210e} represents the de-trended, enlarged light curves
257: taken on the first two nights. Interestingly, one can see hump-like
258: profiles on 2002 October 25 (HJD 2452573) with the amplitude as large as
259: 0.4 mag. They are, however, definitely not superhumps, since three peaks
260: are detectable with an amplitude of ${\sim}$ 0.4 mag during the 0.06
261: days run. These results indicate this outburst was the normal
262: outburst. This is the first recorded $normal$ $outburst$ of V844 Her.
263:
264:
265: \subsection{2003 October outburst}
266:
267: Figure \ref{fig:0310lc} displays the overall light curves during the
268: 2003 outburst of V844 Her. The duration of the outburst appeared to be
269: about 2 weeks. The decline rate of 0.12(1) mag d$^{-1}$ until HJD
270: 2452945, which is a typical value for SU UMa-type dwarf novae. Due to
271: the absence of observations between HJD 2452945 and HJD 2452951, we
272: cannot specify whether there was a phase of a constant magnitude, as was
273: observed in the 2002 May superoutburst. After the plateau stage, V844
274: Her entered the rapid decline phase around HJD 2452956, and the
275: magnitude returned to its quiescent level on HJD 2452958. No
276: rebrightenings were observed during our run. Due to the
277: lack of our observations, we were unable to trace superhump period
278: change and whether a precursor was present.
279:
280:
281: \subsection{2006 April outburst}
282:
283: \subsubsection{light curve}
284:
285: The whole light curve of the 2006 April - May outburst is shown in
286: figure \ref{fig:0604lc}. The duration of the plateau phase was about 2
287: weeks. The magnitude declined almost constantly at the rate of 0.15(1)
288: mag d$^{-1}$ from HJD 2453851 to HJD 2453860, after which the magnitude
289: kept almost constant at the end of the plateau stage. On HJD 2453867,
290: V844 Her became faint with the magnitude of 16.5. There provided no
291: evidence of a rebrightening during our run.
292:
293: \subsubsection{superhump}
294:
295: Figure \ref{fig:0604e} shows the enlarged light curves on the first two
296: days of our observations. There is no signal of superhumps on HJD
297: 2453851, while there were hump-like modulations on HJD 2453853. However,
298: their profile suggested that superhumps had not yet fully grown. Then we
299: suppose the superhumps were detected form HJD 2453854.
300:
301: We performed a period analysis using the 7473 points between HJD 2453854
302: and HJD 2453864, after subtracting the linear declining trend. The theta
303: diagram of the PDM analysis provides the best estimated period of
304: 0.055883(3)d. This value is in good accordance with that obtained during
305: the 2002 May superoutburst.
306:
307: Figuer \ref{fig:0604dlc} indicates the daily averaged light curves
308: during the plateau phase folded by 0.055883(3)d. A rapid rise and slow
309: decline are a typical feature of superhumps. The data obtained on April
310: 28(HJD 2453854) showed the superhumps with an amplitude of 0.2 mag, then
311: the superhump amplitude decreased gradually. A hint of the regrowth of
312: the superhump can be seen on May 5(HJD 2453861).
313:
314: \subsubsection{superhump period change}
315: The superhump maximum timings measured by eye are listed in table 4. A
316: linear regression yields the following equation on the superhump maximum
317: timings;
318:
319: \begin{equation}
320: \mathrm{HJD(max)} = 2453854.1284(14) + 0.055885(18) \times E.
321: \label{eqn:06hjdmax}
322: \end{equation}
323:
324: The obtained $O - C$ diagram is exhibited in figure
325: \ref{fig:0604o-c}. For $-$1 \textless $E$ \textless 128, the best fitting
326: quadratic equation is given by:
327:
328: \begin{eqnarray}
329: O - C = &6.6(0.9) \times 10^{-3} - 3.88(0.34) \times 10^{-4} \times
330: E\nonumber\\
331: &+ 3.05(0.27) \times 10^{-6} \times E^{2}.
332: \label{eqn:06o-c}
333: \end{eqnarray}
334:
335: This equation yields $P_{\rm dot}$ = $\dot{P}$/$P$=10.9(1.0)
336: ${\times}$10$^{-5}$, meaning that the superhump period increases
337: through the superoutburst.
338:
339: \subsection{distance and X-ray luminosity}
340:
341: It is well known that an accurate estimation of the distance to the
342: dwarf novae is not easy. Nevertheless, we can roughly estimate it
343: using an empirical relation derived by \citet{war87CVabsmag} as follows:
344:
345: \begin{equation}
346: M_{\rm V} = 5.64 - 0.259P,
347: \label{eqn:Mv}
348: \end{equation}
349:
350: where $M_{\rm V}$ is the absolute magnitude at the maximum during a
351: normal outburst, and $P$ is the orbital period of the system in the unit
352: of hours. The above equation could be applied for the systems which have
353: a low inclination and do not reach the period minimum. Based on the
354: previous investigations by \citet{tho02gwlibv844herdiuma}, both
355: conditions can be satisfied for V844 Her. Substituting $P$=1.3115 into
356: equation (\ref{eqn:Mv}) and with a little algebra (here we assume that
357: the maximum $V$ magnitude of V844 Her is 12.6), we roughly derived
358: d=290(30) pc as an estimated distance.
359:
360: Using the obtained distance, we can also estimate the X-ray luminosity
361: of V844 Her following the same manner as \citet{ver97ROSAT}, who showed
362: that the $ROSAT$ PSPC countrate in channel 52-201 corresponds to a flux in
363: the 0.5-2.5 keV bandpass given by
364:
365: \begin{equation}
366: {\rm log}F_{\rm 0.5-2.5keV}({\rm erg cm^{-2}s^{-1}}) \sim {\rm log
367: cr_{52-201}(s^{-1})} - 10.88,
368: \label{eqn:x-ray}
369: \end{equation}
370:
371: where cr$_{\rm 52-201}$ denotes the countrate in channel 52-201. With a
372: little algebra, we can obtain the X-ray luminosity between 0.5-2.5 keV
373: is 10$^{31.0{\pm}0.2}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Although the observed X-ray
374: luminosity will be affected by some effects including the inclination of
375: the system, the derived value is relatively large compared to other SU
376: UMa-type dwarf novae given by \citet{ver97ROSAT}.
377:
378: \section{Discussion}
379:
380: \subsection{superhump period change}
381:
382: Historically, the superhump period had been known to
383: decrease during the course of the superoutburst before the tidal
384: instability was discovered (\cite{1979A&A....77....7H}; \cite{vog83lateSH}).
385: The decrease of superhump period was ascribed to shrinkage of the disk
386: radius, or simply a natural consequence of mass depletion from the
387: accretion disk \citep{osa85SHexcess}. Recently, particularly over the
388: past decade, the picture has been altered since numerous systems showed
389: an increase of the superhump period. Such systems are mainly WZ Sge-type
390: dwarf novae, and SU UMa-type dwarf novae with short orbital periods
391: (\cite{sem97swuma}; \cite{nog98swuma}; \cite{bab00v1028cyg};
392: \cite{ish01rzleo}; \cite{uem02j2329}; \cite{ole03v1141aql};
393: \cite{nog04vwcrb}; \cite{ima05gocom};
394: \cite{tem06asas0025}).\footnote{An increase of the superhump period was
395: originally discovered in OY Car \citep{krz85oycarsuper}, which had been
396: left behind for a long time.} Observationally, there appears to be a
397: borderline around $P_{\rm sh}$=0.063 days below which the superhump period
398: tends to increase \citep{ima05gocom}.
399:
400: Figure \ref{fig:p-d} illustrates the superhump period derivative against
401: the mean superhump period of SU UMa-type dwarf novae. The value for V844
402: Her is pointed with the filled circles. In figure \ref{fig:p-d}, V844
403: Her is likely to lie in the general trend. Hence, we firstly confirmed
404: that V844 Her showed the positive $P_{\rm dot}$ derivative and became
405: the shortest period SU UMa-type dwarf nova that was confirmed to exhibit
406: an increase of the superhump period.\footnote{Here we exclude two
407: systems, V485 Cen and EI Psc, for which the systems are believed to pass
408: through another evolutional sequence \cite{uem02j2329}; \cite{pod03amcvn}.}
409:
410: Additionally, we should briefly note on figure \ref{fig:0604o-c}, where
411: one can see data points departured from the quadratic equation
412: (\ref{eqn:06o-c}), corresponding to $E$ ${\sim}$ $-$20. Recent
413: CCD photometry indicates that this feature is observed not only for V844
414: Her, but also for other short period SU UMa-type stars exhibiting the
415: positive $P_{\rm dot}$. The systems include ASAS 102522-1542.4 (Maehara
416: et al. in preparation), FL TrA (Imada et al. (2006)), ASAS 160048-4846.2
417: (\cite{ima06asas1600letter}; Imada et al. in preparation). Theoretical
418: models suggest a dramatic variation in temperature or pressure in the
419: accretion disk is a possible cause of the superhump period change in
420: this stage (\cite{mur98SH}; \cite{mon01SH};
421: \cite{2006MNRAS.371..235P}). We require further samples in order to
422: discuss the nature of the superhump period change at this early stage.
423:
424: \subsection{on the nature of V844 Her}
425:
426: It is well known that SU UMa-type dwarf novae show two types of
427: superoutbursts: superoutbursts with a precursor, and superoutbursts
428: without a precursor, though precursor-main superoutburst is hardly
429: observed. For superoutbursts without a precursor, a handful of systems,
430: especially archetype TOADs WX Cet and SW UMa, show three types of
431: superoutburst: a short superoutburst with a duration as short as 10
432: days, an intermediate superoutburst continuing for 2 weeks, and a long
433: superoutburst lasting longer than 20 days \citep{how95swumabcumatvcrv}.
434: In the case of V844 Her, all the three superoutbursts reported here
435: lasted about 2 weeks, suggesting that these superoutbursts belong to the
436: intermediate category, or V844 Her simply lies in the majority of SU
437: UMa-type dwarf novae.
438:
439: In order to examine whether V844 Her shows other types of
440: superoutbursts, we extracted the observations reported to AAVSO and
441: VSNET since the 1996 discovery. Table \ref{tbl:pre_outbursts} summarizes
442: the recorded outbursts of V844 Her, from which we can properly give a
443: constraint on the durations of outbursts\footnote{As for data obtained
444: before 1996, \citet{ant96newvar}
445: studied Moscow collection of photographic plates and found four
446: outbursts of V844 Her. Two were definitely superoutburst, of which one
447: was superoutburst without a precursor.}. As can be noticed in table
448: \ref{tbl:pre_outbursts}, no superoutburst provides evidence for a
449: duration longer than 20 days, and the durations of the superoutbursts
450: appears to converge to 2 weeks. From the archives, we newly
451: discovered two facts. One is that V844 Her shows no
452: precursor. Of course we have overlooked the onset of superoutburst in a
453: few cases, for which we cannot specify the type of
454: superoutburst. However, the absence of a precursor has been confirmed in
455: the most cases of the superoutbursts by virtue of the amateur
456: observers. The other is that no rebrightenings have been observed in
457: V844 Her despite careful monitoring of the system since the 1996 discovery
458: \citep{ant96newvar}. Recent extensive studies over the past decades
459: suggest that rebrightenings tend to occur among SU UMa-type dwarf novae
460: with short orbital periods (\cite{kuu96TOAD}; \cite{ima06j0222}).
461:
462: The most interesting fact is, although it has been mentioned for a long
463: time, that V844 Her shows almost no normal outbursts (\cite{kat00v844her};
464: \cite{tho02gwlibv844herdiuma}). From the viewpoint of the original
465: thermal-tidal instability model, normal outbursts occur more frequently
466: as the mass transfer rate from the secondary increases
467: (\cite{osa89suuma}; \cite{osa95eruma}). Further, the optical spectrum of
468: V844 Her suggests a relatively high mass transfer rate
469: \citep{2005AJ....129.2386S}, which accelerates a circulation on the limit
470: cycle in the ${\Sigma}$-$T$ diagram. From table \ref{tbl:pre_outbursts},
471: the supercycle of V844 Her is estimated to be about 300 days, which is
472: in agreement with the previous work \citep{kat00v844her}. When compared
473: to the other systems having similar supercycles, e.g., Z Cha, the
474: peculiarity of V844 Her becomes much clear with respect to the absence
475: of normal outbursts.
476:
477: Although we cannot draw a firm conclusion against the infrequent normal
478: outbursts, one possibility is that evaporation in the accretion disk is
479: working well so that a hole is created in the inner region of the disk and
480: avoids an outburst (\cite{mey94siphonflow}; \cite{liu95DNevaporation};
481: \cite{las95wzsge}; \cite{ham97wzsgemodel}; \cite{min98wzsge}). The model
482: also suggests large X-ray luminosity \citep{las95wzsge} and expansion of
483: the accretion disk during quiescence \citep{min98wzsge}. As for the
484: former, the relatively large X-ray luminosity of V844 Her may be
485: suggestive of the evaporation. The latter should be investigated by
486: peak-separation studies during quiescence.
487:
488: \section{Conclusions}
489:
490: In this paper, we reported on time resolved CCD photometry during 2002
491: May, 2002 October, 2003 October, and 2006 April outbursts, of which
492: three were superoutburst. We estimated the mean superhump periods of
493: 0.05584(64)d for 2002 May and 0.055883(3)d for 2006 April
494: superoutbursts, respectively. We successfully
495: examined superhump period change during the 2002 May and 2006 April
496: superoutburst. The resultant period derivatives showed an period increase
497: of superhumps during the plateau stages in both superoutbursts, which we
498: confirmed in V844 Her for the first time. We also derived the distance
499: to V844 Her to be 290(30) pc. Using the value, the X-ray luminosity
500: between 0.5 and 2.5 keV is estimated 10$^{31.0{\pm}0.2}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
501:
502: To appreciate the long-term behavior of V844 Her, we investigated the
503: archival light curves since the discovery of the variable. Using the
504: extensive data, we estimated a possible supercycle to be ${\sim}$ 300
505: days, which is in good agreement with
506: \citet{tho02gwlibv844herdiuma}. From the archives, it turned out that
507: V844 Her shows neither precursors nor rebrightenings, although we cannot
508: rule out the possibility that we missed a few events. We also confirmed
509: that V844 Her shows almost no normal outbursts in spite of the
510: intermediate supercycle among SU UMa-type dwarf novae. A possible
511: explanation on the absence of a normal outburst is that the evaporation
512: mechanism may play a role, which is consistent with the relatively large
513: X-ray luminosity of V844 Her. In the future, the evolution of the disk
514: radius during quiescence should be investigated in order to test our
515: suggestion.
516:
517: \vskip 10mm
518:
519: We are grateful to many observers who have reported vital observations.
520: We acknowledge with thanks the variable star observations from the AAVSO
521: and VSNET International Database contributed by observers worldwide and
522: used in this research. This work is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for the
523: 21st Century COE ``Center for Diversity and Universality in Physics''
524: from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
525: (MEXT). This work is partly supported by a grant-in aid from the
526: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
527: (No. 17340055, 16340057, 17740105). Part of this work is supported by a
528: Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
529: for Young Scientists (RI).
530:
531:
532: \begin{table*}
533: \caption{Log of observations}
534: \label{tbl:obs}
535: \begin{center}
536: \begin{tabular}{rccccc}
537: \hline\hline
538: Date & $^*$ HJD start & $^*$ HJD end & $^\dagger$Exp & $^\ddagger$ N & $^\S$ ID \\
539: \hline
540: 2002 May 20 & 52415.0264 & 52415.2657 & 10 & 1051 & KM \\
541: 21 & 52416.2469 & 52416.2942 & 30 & 140 & Kyoto \\
542: 24 & 52419.0356 & 52419.3031 & 10 & 1244 & KM \\
543: & 52419.2251 & 52419.2973 & 30 & 182 & Kyoto \\
544: 25 & 52420.2194 & 52420.2997 & 30 & 215 & Kyoto \\
545: 27 & 52422.2133 & 52422.2934 & 30 & 195 & Kyoto \\
546: 2002 October 24 & 52571.8704 & 52571.9989 & 30 & 122 & Kyoto \\
547: & 52571.9074 & 52571.9792 & 10 & 290 & OUS \\
548: 25 & 52572.8721 & 52573.0185 & 30 & 261 & Kyoto \\
549: & 52572.9032 & 52572.9724 & 10 & 257 & OUS \\
550: 27 & 52574.9060 & 52574.9557 & 40 & 89 & RIKEN \\
551: 28 & 52575.8676 & 52575.9966 & 40 & 222 & RIKEN \\
552: & 52575.8758 & 52575.9884 & 30 & 188 & Kyoto \\
553: 29 & 52576.8715 & 52576.9917 & 30 & 122 & Kyoto \\
554: & 52576.9266 & 52576.9620 & 25-30 & 77 & OUS \\
555: 30 & 52577.8781 & 52577.9332 & 30 & 91 & Kyoto \\
556: 2003 October 27 & 52939.8714 & 52939.9845 & 30 & 185 & Kyoto \\
557: 29 & 52941.8702 & 52941.9478 & 30 & 148 & Kyoto \\
558: 2003 November 1 & 52944.8663 & 52944.9188 & 30 & 65 & Kyoto \\
559: 7 & 52950.8707 & 52950.9481 & 30 & 116 & Kyoto \\
560: 12 & 52955.8781 & 52955.9428 & 30 & 93 & Kyoto \\
561: 14 & 52957.8631 & 52957.8721 & 30 & 18 & Kyoto \\
562: 2006 April 25 & 53851.0347 & 53851.1642 & 30 & 235 & Njh \\
563: & 53851.1684 & 53851.2948 & 30 & 278 & Kyoto \\
564: & 53851.2312 & 53851.3075 & 30 & 124 & Mhh \\
565: 27 & 53853.0808 & 53853.3080 & 30 & 533 & Kyoto \\
566: 28 & 53854.0403 & 53854.1606 & 30 & 221 & Njh \\
567: & 53854.1103 & 53854.2534 & 30 & 408 & Mhh \\
568: & 53854.1183 & 53854.3170 & 30 & 373 & Kyoto \\
569: 29 & 53855.4640 & 53855.5378 & 30 & 107 & PD \\
570: 30 & 53856.1070 & 53856.2445 & 30 & 506 & Mhh \\
571: & 53856.3505 & 53856.5867 & 30 & 343 & PD \\
572: 2006 May 1 & 53857.1459 & 53857.1463 & 30 & 200 & Mhh \\
573: 2 & 53858.0236 & 53858.1938 & 30 & 307 & Njh \\
574: & 53858.1229 & 53858.3097 & 30 & 383 & Kyoto \\
575: 3 & 53859.0606 & 53859.1608 & 30 & 182 & Njh \\
576: & 53859.0655 & 53859.2031 & 30 & 363 & Mhh \\
577: & 53859.1268 & 53859.2947 & 30 & 192 & Kyoto \\
578: & 53859.1568 & 53859.3309 & 30 & 439 & KU \\
579: 4 & 53860.0693 & 53860.2805 & 30 & 534 & Mhh \\
580: & 53860.0842 & 53860.2142 & 30 & 237 & Njh \\
581: & 53860.1026 & 53860.3091 & 30 & 498 & Kyoto \\
582: & 53860.1559 & 53860.3223 & 30 & 369 & KU \\
583: 5 & 53861.0016 & 53861.2309 & 30 & 406 & Njh \\
584: & 53861.0656 & 53861.3024 & 30 & 538 & Kyoto \\
585: & 53861.0755 & 53861.3121 & 30 & 452 & KU \\
586: & 53861.1565 & 53861.2755 & 30 & 312 & Mhh \\
587: 8 & 53864.1508 & 53864.2961 & 30 & 184 & Kyoto \\
588: 11 & 53867.0282 & 53867.2747 & 30 & 469 & Kyoto \\
589: 14 & 53870.0300 & 53870.1547 & 30 & 230 & Kyoto \\
590: 20 & 53876.1544 & 53876.3008 & 30 & 243 & Kyoto \\
591: \hline
592: \multicolumn{6}{l}{$^*$ : Start and end time of the observation. HJD $-$
593: 2400000.} \\
594: \multicolumn{6}{l}{$^\dagger$ : Exposure time} \\
595: \multicolumn{6}{l}{$^\ddagger$ : Number of frames.} \\
596: \multicolumn{6}{l}{$^\S$ : ID of the observers. See Table
597: \ref{tbl:observers}.} \\
598: \end{tabular}
599: \end{center}
600: \end{table*}
601:
602: \begin{table*}
603: \caption{List of observers.}
604: \label{tbl:observers}
605: \begin{center}
606: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
607: \hline\hline
608: ID & Observer & Site & Telescopes \\
609: \hline
610: KM & K. Morikawa & Okayama, Japan & 25cm \\
611: KU & S. Oizumi $+$ $^*$ & Kagoshima, Japan & 100cm \\
612: Kyoto & A. Imada $+$ $^\dagger$ & Kyoto, Japan & 40cm \\
613: Mhh & H. Maehara & Saitama, Japan & 25cm \\
614: Njh & K. Nakajima & Mie, Japan & 25cm \\
615: OUS & K. Tanabe & Okayama, Japan & 10cm \\
616: PD & P. A. Dubovsky & Kolonica Saddle, Slovakia & 28cm $\&$ 30cm \\
617: RIKEN & K. Torii & Saitama, Japan & 25cm \\
618: \hline
619: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^*$ : observer S.Oizumi, H.Yamamoto, S.Tanada, T.Yasuda,
620: Y.Arao, K.Kodama, M.Suzuki and T.Matsuo.} \\
621: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^\dagger$ : observer A. Imada, K. Kubota,
622: K. Sugiyasu and T. Kato.} \\
623: \end{tabular}
624: \end{center}
625: \end{table*}
626:
627:
628: \begin{figure}
629: \begin{center}
630: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0205lc.eps}}
631: \end{center}
632: \caption{The obtained light curve during the 2002 May outburst. The
633: abscissa and the ordinate denote the fractional HJD and the magnitude,
634: respectively. The bottom triangle means the negative observation. The
635: opened circles show the visual observations. The light curve shows no
636: sign of precursor.}
637: \label{fig:0205lc}
638: \end{figure}
639:
640:
641: \begin{figure}
642: \begin{center}
643: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0205mhp.eps}}
644: \end{center}
645: \caption{Representative light curves obtained during the 2002 May
646: superoutburst. The vertical and the horizontal axes denote the
647: fractional HJD and differential magnitude, respectively. For the
648: purpose of a comparison between nights, the light curve on HJD 2452419
649: (May 24) was shifted by 0.3 mag.}
650: \label{fig:0205mhp}
651: \end{figure}
652:
653:
654: %\begin{figure}
655: % \begin{center}
656: % \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0205pdm.eps}}
657: % \end{center}
658: % \caption{Period analysis of superhumps during the 2002 May
659: % superoutburst. The analysis was performed for the prewhitened data
660: % obtained in 2002 May. The arrow indicates the strongest signal,
661: % corresponding to 0.05584(64) days.}
662: %\end{figure}
663:
664:
665: \begin{figure}
666: \begin{center}
667: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0205o-c.eps}}
668: \end{center}
669: \caption{$O - C$ diagram of superhump maxima. The $O - C$ was calculated
670: against equation (\ref{eqn:02hjdmax}). The dashed curve is the best fitting
671: quadratic described in equation (\ref{eqn:02o-c}). Note that the superhump
672: period increased as the superoutburst proceeded.}
673: \label{fig:0205o-c}
674: \end{figure}
675:
676:
677: \begin{table}
678: \caption{Timings of superhump maxima during the 2002 May superoutburst.}
679: \label{tbl:02o-c}
680: \begin{center}
681: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
682: \hline\hline
683: E$^*$ & HJD$^{\dagger}$ & $O-C$ & Error$^{\ddagger}$ & ID \\
684: \hline
685: 0 & 2415.0431 & 0.000700 & 0.001 & KM \\
686: 1 & 2415.1019 & 0.003641 & 0.001 & KM \\
687: 3 & 2415.2110 & 0.001023 & 0.001 & KM \\
688: 22 & 2416.2681 & -0.003195 & 0.003 & Kyoto \\
689: 72 & 2419.0634 & -0.000839 & 0.001 & KM \\
690: 73 & 2419.1189 & -0.001198 & 0.002 & KM \\
691: 74 & 2419.1754 & -0.000557 & 0.002 & KM \\
692: 75 & 2419.2281 & -0.003716 & 0.002 & KM \\
693: 129 & 2422.2523 & 0.004105 & 0.003 & Kyoto \\
694: \hline
695: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^*$ Cycle count.} \\
696: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{\dagger}$ HJD-2450000} \\
697: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{\ddagger}$ In the unit of day.} \\
698: \end{tabular}
699: \end{center}
700: \end{table}
701:
702:
703: \begin{figure}
704: \begin{center}
705: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0210lc.eps}}
706: \end{center}
707: \caption{Light curve during the 2002 October outburst. The vertical and
708: the horizontal axes denote the magnitude and HJD, respectively. The
709: filled circles show the nightly averaged magnitudes. The error bars
710: mean the standard error for each day. The open circles show visual
711: observations. The bottom triangles show the negative observations.}
712: \label{fig:0210lc}
713: \end{figure}
714:
715:
716: \begin{figure}
717: \begin{center}
718: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0210early.eps}}
719: \end{center}
720: \caption{Enlarged light curves during the first two nights.
721: Hump-like profiles are clearly seen on HJD 2452573 (October 25). The
722: profiles of the humps are clearly different from that of superhumps.}
723: \label{fig:0210e}
724: \end{figure}
725:
726:
727: %\begin{figure}
728: %\begin{center}
729: %\resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0210pdm.eps}}
730: %\end{center}
731: %\caption{}
732: %\end{figure}
733:
734:
735: \begin{figure}
736: \begin{center}
737: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0310lc.eps}}
738: \end{center}
739: \caption{The resultant light curve during the 2003 October
740: superoutburst. The bottom triangle and the open circles mean the
741: negative and the visual observations, respectively.}
742: \label{fig:0310lc}
743: \end{figure}
744:
745:
746: %\begin{figure}
747: % \begin{center}
748: % \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0310early.eps}}
749: % \end{center}
750: % \caption{Enlarged light curves on HJD 2452939 and 2452941. The original
751: % light curve on HJD 2452939 (October 27) includes large uncertainty, so
752: % that the data were binned with 4 frames. Both light curves removed
753: % linear decline trends. We can definitely see a common feature of
754: % superhumps.}
755: %\end{figure}
756:
757:
758: \begin{figure}
759: \begin{center}
760: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0604lc.eps}}
761: \end{center}
762: \caption{The whole light curve of the 2006 April-May superoutburst. The
763: horizontal and vertical axes indicate the HJD and the magnitude,
764: respectively. The bottom triangle indicates the negative
765: observation. The filled circles represent the daily averaged
766: magnitude. The typical error bars are within the circles.}
767: \label{fig:0604lc}
768: \end{figure}
769:
770:
771: \begin{figure}
772: \begin{center}
773: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0604early.eps}}
774: \end{center}
775: \caption{First 2-days enlarged light curves since we began observing V844
776: Her. There were almost no feature charactaristics on April 25, while hump-like
777: profiles appeared clearly on April 27.}
778: \label{fig:0604e}
779: \end{figure}
780:
781: \begin{figure}
782: \begin{center}
783: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0604dlc.eps}}
784: \end{center}
785: \caption{Daily averaged light curves of the 2006 April-May superoutburst
786: observations.}
787: \label{fig:0604dlc}
788: \end{figure}
789:
790: %\begin{figure}
791: % \begin{center}
792: % \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0604pdm.eps}}
793: % \end{center}
794: % \caption{Theta diagram of a PDM analysis apply to the data between HJD
795: % 2453854 and HJD 2453864. We determined P$=$0.055883(3)d as the best
796: % estimate period of the superhumps.}
797: %\end{figure}
798:
799:
800: \begin{longtable}{ccccc}
801: \caption{Timings of the superhump maxima during the 2006 April
802: superoutburst.}
803: \label{tbl:06o-c}\\
804: \hline\hline
805: E$^*$ & HJD$^{\dagger}$ & $O-C$ & Error$^{\ddagger}$ & ID \\
806: \hline
807: -18 & 3853.1201 & -0.002163 & 0.006 & Kyoto \\
808: -17 & 3853.1723 & -0.005855 & 0.007 & Kyoto \\
809: -16 & 3853.2292 & -0.004846 & 0.005 & Kyoto \\
810: -15 & 3853.2893 & -0.000638 & 0.005 & Kyoto \\
811: -1 & 3854.0782 & 0.005781 & 0.004 & Njh \\
812: 0 & 3854.1351 & 0.006789 & 0.001 & Mhh \\
813: & 3854.1354 & 0.007089 & 0.002 & Njh \\
814: & 3854.1356 & 0.007289 & 0.002 & Kyoto \\
815: 1 & 3854.1904 & 0.006298 & 0.002 & Kyoto \\
816: & 3854.1905 & 0.006298 & 0.002 & Mhh \\
817: 2 & 3854.2495 & 0.009506 & 0.005 & Kyoto \\
818: 3 & 3854.3027 & 0.006815 & 0.003 & Kyoto \\
819: 36 & 3856.1368 & -0.003606 & 0.002 & Mhh \\
820: 37 & 3856.1901 & -0.006098 & 0.002 & Mhh \\
821: 41 & 3856.4149 & -0.004964 & 0.003 & PD \\
822: 42 & 3856.4693 & -0.006456 & 0.009 & PD \\
823: 43 & 3856.5204 & -0.011247 & 0.006 & PD \\
824: 70 & 3858.0322 & -0.008419 & 0.019 & Njh \\
825: 71 & 3858.0950 & -0.001610 & 0.009 & Njh \\
826: 72 & 3858.1442 & -0.008202 & 0.004 & Njh \\
827: & 3858.1470 & -0.005502 & 0.004 & Kyoto \\
828: 73 & 3858.2022 & -0.006193 & 0.004 & Kyoto \\
829: 74 & 3858.2577 & -0.006485 & 0.005 & Kyoto \\
830: 89 & 3859.0978 & -0.004858 & 0.003 & Mhh \\
831: & 3859.0984 & -0.004158 & 0.005 & Njh \\
832: 90 & 3859.1539 & -0.004550 & 0.003 & Mhh \\
833: & 3859.1570 & -0.001550 & 0.005 & Kyoto \\
834: 91 & 3859.2111 & -0.002837 & 0.003 & KU \\
835: 92 & 3859.2699 & -0.000078 & 0.002 & KU \\
836: 93 & 3859.3239 & 0.001807 & 0.005 & KU \\
837: 108 & 3860.1624 & -0.002097 & 0.008 & Kyoto \\
838: & 3860.1670 & 0.003014 & 0.002 & KU \\
839: 109 & 3860.2242 & 0.003811 & 0.010 & Kyoto \\
840: & 3860.2243 & 0.004429 & 0.002 & KU \\
841: 110 & 3860.2806 & 0.004319 & 0.005 & Kyoto \\
842: 125 & 3861.1191 & 0.004446 & 0.007 & Kyoto \\
843: & 3861.1212 & 0.007165 & 0.003 & KU \\
844: 126 & 3861.1706 & 0.000055 & 0.012 & Kyoto \\
845: & 3861.1714 & 0.000755 & 0.003 & Mhh \\
846: 127 & 3861.2305 & 0.004063 & 0.004 & Mhh \\
847: 128 & 3861.2889 & 0.007209 & 0.003 & KU \\
848: \hline
849: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^*$ Cycle count.} \\
850: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{\dagger}$ HJD-2450000} \\
851: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{\ddagger}$ In the unit of day.} \\
852: \end{longtable}
853: % \end{tabular}
854: % \end{center}
855: %\end{table}
856:
857:
858: \begin{figure}
859: \begin{center}
860: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{0604o-c.eps}}
861: \end{center}
862: \caption{$O-C$ diagram during the 2006 superoutburst. The horizontal and
863: vertical axes denote the cycle count (E) and $O-C$ (day),
864: respectively. The solid curve is the best fitting quadratic described
865: in equation (\ref{eqn:06o-c}). Note that the superhump period increased
866: as the superoutburst proceeded.}
867: \label{fig:0604o-c}
868: \end{figure}
869:
870:
871: \begin{figure}
872: \begin{center}
873: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{p-diagram.eps}}
874: \end{center}
875: \caption{The $\dot{P}$/P diagram for SU UMa-type dwarf nova. The data
876: points were reference to \citet{uem05tvcrv}. The filled circles denote
877: the data obtained in this work.}
878: \label{fig:p-d}
879: \end{figure}
880:
881:
882: \begin{table}
883: \caption{Recorded outbursts of V844 Her.}
884: \label{tbl:pre_outbursts}
885: \begin{center}
886: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
887: \hline\hline
888: Date & & Duration & Type & precursor\\
889: \hline
890: 1996 & October & 7$<T<$20 & S & $\times$ \\
891: 1997 & May & $T=$15 & S & $\times$ \\
892: 1998 & December & 8$<T<$19 & S & ? \\
893: 1999 & September & 14$<T<$16 & S & $\bigtriangleup$ \\
894: 2000 & July & 16$<T<$17 & S & $\times$ \\
895: 2001 & August & 16$<T<$18 & S & $\times$ \\
896: 2002 & May & 12$<T<$15 & S & $\times$ \\
897: 2002 & October & 5$<T<$6 & N & -- \\
898: 2002 & December & 10$<T<$18 & S & ? \\
899: 2003 & May & 3$<T<$5 & N & -- \\
900: 2003 & October & 12$<T<$16 & S & ? \\
901: 2005 & January & 14$<T<$16 & S & $\bigtriangleup$ \\
902: 2006 & April & 15$<T<$18 & S & $\times$ \\
903: \hline
904: \multicolumn{5}{l}{S : Superoutburst.} \\
905: \multicolumn{5}{l}{N : Normal outburst.} \\
906: \multicolumn{5}{l}{$\times$ : No precursor.} \\
907: \multicolumn{5}{l}{$\bigtriangleup$ : Probably no precursor.} \\
908: \multicolumn{5}{l}{? : Unable to discern the type of superoutburst.} \\
909: \end{tabular}
910: \end{center}
911: \end{table}
912:
913:
914:
915:
916: \begin{thebibliography}{}
917:
918: \bibitem[{Adelman-McCarthy} et~al.(2006)]{2006ApJS..162...38A}
919: {Adelman-McCarthy}, J.~K., {et~al.}\ 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
920:
921: \bibitem[Antipin(1996)]{ant96newvar}
922: Antipin, S.~V.\ 1996, \ibvs, 4360
923:
924: \bibitem[Baba et~al.(2000)]{bab00v1028cyg}
925: Baba, H., Kato, T., Nogami, D., Hirata, R., Matsumoto, K., \& Sadakane, K.\
926: 2000, \pasj, 52, 429
927:
928: \bibitem[Fernie(1989)]{fer89error}
929: Fernie, J.~D.\ 1989, \pasp, 101, 225
930:
931: \bibitem[{Haefner} et~al.(1979)]{1979A&A....77....7H}
932: {Haefner}, R., {Schoembs}, R., \& {Vogt}, N.\ 1979, \aap, 77, 7
933:
934: \bibitem[Hameury et~al.(1997)]{ham97wzsgemodel}
935: Hameury, J.-M., Lasota, J.-P., \& Hur\'{e}, J.~M.\ 1997, \mnras, 287, 937
936:
937: \bibitem[Hellier(2001)]{hel01book}
938: Hellier, C.\ 2001, Cataclysmic Variable Stars: how and why they vary
939: (\PublisherSpringer)
940:
941: \bibitem[Henden, Honeycutt(1997)]{hen97sequence}
942: Henden, A.~A., \& Honeycutt, R.~K.\ 1997, \pasp, 109, 441
943:
944: \bibitem[Hoard et~al.(2002)]{hoa02CV2MASS}
945: Hoard, D.~W., Wachter, S., Clark, L.~L., \& Bowers, T.~P.\ 2002, \apj, 565,
946: 511
947:
948: \bibitem[Howell et~al.(1995)]{how95swumabcumatvcrv}
949: Howell, S.~B., Szkody, P., Sonneborn, G., Fried, R., Mattei, J., Oliversen,
950: R.~J., Ingram, D., \& Hurst, G.~M.\ 1995, \apj, 453, 454
951:
952: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2005)]{ima05gocom}
953: Imada, A., {et~al.}\ 2005, \pasj, 57, 193
954:
955: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2006a)]{ima06j0137}
956: Imada, A., {et~al.}\ 2006a, \pasj, 58, 143
957:
958: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2006b)]{ima06j0222}
959: Imada, A., Kubota, K., Kato, T., Nogami, D., Maehara, H., Nakajima, K.,
960: Uemura, M., \& Ishioka, R.\ 2006b, \pasj, 58, L23
961:
962: \bibitem[Imada, Monard(2006)]{ima06asas1600letter}
963: Imada, A., \& Monard, L. A. G.~B.\ 2006, \pasj, 58, L19
964:
965: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2001)]{ish01rzleo}
966: Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2001, \pasj, 53, 905
967:
968: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2003)]{kat03hodel}
969: Kato, T., Nogami, D., Moilanen, M., \& Yamaoka, H.\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 989
970:
971: \bibitem[Kato, Uemura(2000)]{kat00v844her}
972: Kato, T., \& Uemura, M.\ 2000, \ibvs, 4902
973:
974: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2004)]{kat04vsnet}
975: Kato, T., Uemura, M., Ishioka, R., Nogami, D., Kunjaya, C., Baba, H., \&
976: Yamaoka, H.\ 2004, \pasj, 56S, 1
977:
978: \bibitem[Krzeminski, Vogt(1985)]{krz85oycarsuper}
979: Krzeminski, W., \& Vogt, N.\ 1985, \aap, 144, 124
980:
981: \bibitem[Kuulkers et~al.(1996)]{kuu96TOAD}
982: Kuulkers, E., Howell, S.~B., \& van Paradijs, J.\ 1996, \apjl, 462, L87
983:
984: \bibitem[Lasota et~al.(1995)]{las95wzsge}
985: Lasota, J.~P., Hameury, J.~M., \& Hur\'{e}, J.~M.\ 1995, \aap, 302, L29
986:
987: \bibitem[Liu et~al.(1995)]{liu95DNevaporation}
988: Liu, F.~K., Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 1995, \aap, 300, 823
989:
990: \bibitem[Meyer, Meyer-Hofmeister(1994)]{mey94siphonflow}
991: Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 1994, \aap, 288, 175
992:
993: \bibitem[Mineshige et~al.(1998)]{min98wzsge}
994: Mineshige, S., Liu, B., Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 1998, \pasj, 50,
995: L5
996:
997: \bibitem[Montgomery(2001)]{mon01SH}
998: Montgomery, M.~M.\ 2001, \mnras, 325, 761
999:
1000: \bibitem[Murray(1998)]{mur98SH}
1001: Murray, J.~R.\ 1998, \mnras, 297, 323
1002:
1003: \bibitem[Nogami et~al.(1998)]{nog98swuma}
1004: Nogami, D., Baba, H., Kato, T., \& Nov\'{a}k, R.\ 1998, \pasj, 50, 297
1005:
1006: \bibitem[Nogami et~al.(2004)]{nog04vwcrb}
1007: Nogami, D., Uemura, M., Ishioka, R., Kato, T., \& Pietz, J.\ 2004, \pasj, 56,
1008: S155
1009:
1010: \bibitem[Olech(2003)]{ole03v1141aql}
1011: Olech, A.\ 2003, \AcA, 53, 85
1012:
1013: \bibitem[Osaki(1985)]{osa85SHexcess}
1014: Osaki, Y.\ 1985, \aap, 144, 369
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Osaki(1989)]{osa89suuma}
1017: Osaki, Y.\ 1989, \pasj, 41, 1005
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Osaki(1995)]{osa95eruma}
1020: Osaki, Y.\ 1995, \pasj, 47, L11
1021:
1022: \bibitem[Osaki(1996)]{osa96review}
1023: Osaki, Y.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 39
1024:
1025: \bibitem[{Pearson}(2006)]{2006MNRAS.371..235P}
1026: {Pearson}, K.~J.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 235
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Podsiadlowski et~al.(2003)]{pod03amcvn}
1029: Podsiadlowski, Ph., Han, Z., \& Rappaport, S.\ 2003, \mnras, 340, 1214
1030:
1031: \bibitem[Semeniuk et~al.(1997)]{sem97swuma}
1032: Semeniuk, I., Olech, A., Kwast, T., \& Nalezyty, M.\ 1997, \AcA, 47, 201
1033:
1034: \bibitem[Stellingwerf(1978)]{ste78pdm}
1035: Stellingwerf, R.~F.\ 1978, \apj, 224, 953
1036:
1037: \bibitem[{Szkody} et~al.(2005)]{2005AJ....129.2386S}
1038: {Szkody}, P., {et~al.}\ 2005, \aj, 129, 2386
1039:
1040: \bibitem[Templeton et~al.(2006)]{tem06asas0025}
1041: Templeton, M.R., {et~al.}\ 2006, \pasp, 118, 226
1042:
1043: \bibitem[Thorstensen et~al.(2002)]{tho02gwlibv844herdiuma}
1044: Thorstensen, J.~R., Patterson, J.~O., Kemp, J., \& Vennes, S.\ 2002, \pasp,
1045: 114, 1108
1046:
1047: \bibitem[Uemura et~al.(2002)]{uem02j2329}
1048: Uemura, M., {et~al.}\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 599
1049:
1050: \bibitem[Uemura et~al.(2005)]{uem05tvcrv}
1051: Uemura, M., {et~al.}\ 2005, \aap, 432, 261
1052:
1053: \bibitem[Verbunt et~al.(1997)]{ver97ROSAT}
1054: Verbunt, F., Bunk, W.~H., Ritter, H., \& Pfeffermann, E.\ 1997, \aap, 327,
1055: 602
1056:
1057: \bibitem[{Voges} et~al.(1999)]{1999A&A...349..389V}
1058: {Voges}, W., {et~al.}\ 1999, \aap, 349, 389
1059:
1060: \bibitem[Vogt(1983)]{vog83lateSH}
1061: Vogt, N.\ 1983, \aap, 118, 95
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Warner(1987)]{war87CVabsmag}
1064: Warner, B.\ 1987, \mnras, 227, 23
1065:
1066: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{war95book}
1067: Warner, B.\ 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (\PublisherCambridge)
1068:
1069: \end{thebibliography}
1070:
1071: \end{document}