1: \def\kms{$\mathrm {km}~\mathrm{s}^{-1}$}
2: \def\om{\Omega_{\rm p}}
3: \def\len{a_B}
4: \def\lag{D_L}
5: \def\pin{{\cal X}}
6: \def\kin{{\cal V}}
7: \def\vpd{{\cal R}}
8:
9: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article} % ApJ
10: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} % preprint
11: %\documentclass{article}
12:
13:
14: \lefthead{Corsini et al.}
15: \righthead{The bar pattern speed of NGC 4431}
16:
17: \begin{document}
18:
19: \title{The bar pattern speed of the dwarf galaxy NGC 4431$^1$}
20: \footnotetext[1]{Based on observations collected at the European
21: Southern Observatory, Chile (ESO N$^o$ 71.B-0138(A)
22: and N$^o$ 73.B-0091(A)). }
23:
24:
25: \author{E.~M.~Corsini\altaffilmark{2},
26: J.~A.~L.~Aguerri\altaffilmark{3},
27: Victor~P.~Debattista\altaffilmark{4,5},
28: A.~Pizzella\altaffilmark{2},
29: F.~D.~Barazza\altaffilmark{6}, and
30: H.~Jerjen\altaffilmark{7}}
31:
32: \altaffiltext{2}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Padova,
33: Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova, Italy,
34: {\tt enricomaria.corsini@unipd.it},
35: {\tt alessandro.pizzella@unipd.it}}
36: \altaffiltext{3}{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias, V\'{\i}a
37: L\'actea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna, Spain, {\tt jalfonso@iac.es}}
38: \altaffiltext{4}{Astronomy Department, University of Washington,
39: Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195-1580, USA,
40: {\tt debattis@astro.washington.edu}}
41: \altaffiltext{5}{Brooks Prize Fellow}
42: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin,
43: 1 University Station, C1400, Austin, TX 78712-0259, USA,
44: {\tt barazza@astro.as.utexas.edu}}
45: \altaffiltext{7}{Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
46: Mt. Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University,
47: Cotter Road, Weston ACT 2611, Australia,
48: {\tt jerjen@mso.anu.edu.au}}
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: %
52: We present surface photometry and stellar kinematics of NGC 4431, a
53: barred dwarf galaxy in the Virgo cluster undergoing a tidal
54: interaction with one of its neighbors, NGC 4436. We measured its bar
55: pattern speed using the Tremaine-Weinberg method, and derived the
56: ratio of the corotation radius, $\lag$, to the bar semi-major axis,
57: $\len$. We found $\lag/\len =0.6^{+1.2}_{-0.4}$ at $99\%$ confidence
58: level. Albeit with large uncertainty, the probability that the
59: bar ends close to its corotation radius (i.e., $1.0 \leq \lag/\len
60: \leq 1.4$) is about twice as likely as that the bar is much shorter
61: than corotation radius (i.e., $\lag/\len > 1.4$).
62: %
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65:
66: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC~4431) ---
67: galaxies: kinematics and dynamics --- galaxies: elliptical and
68: lenticular, cD --- galaxies: photometry --- galaxies: structure}
69:
70:
71: %\date{{\it Draft version on \today}}
72:
73: \section{Introduction}
74: \label{sec:intro}
75:
76: Stellar bars are observed in a substantial fraction of nearby disk
77: galaxies (Knapen et al. 2000; Eskridge et al. 2000; Marinova \& Jogee
78: 2006). Their growth is partly regulated by the exchange of angular
79: momentum with the stellar disk and the dark matter (DM) halo. For this
80: reason the dynamical evolution of bars can be used to constrain the
81: distribution of DM in the inner regions of galaxy disks.
82: %
83: Using perturbation theory Weinberg (1985) predicted that a bar would
84: lose angular momentum to a massive DM halo through dynamical friction,
85: slowing down in the process.
86: %
87: This prediction was subsequently confirmed in $N$-body simulations
88: (Debattista \& Sellwood 1998, 2000; Athanassoula 2003; O'Neill
89: \& Dubinski 2003; Sellwood \& Debattista 2006). They found that
90: bars are slowed efficiently within a few rotation periods if a
91: substantial density of DM is present in the region of the bar. On the
92: other hand, if the mass distribution is dominated by the stellar disk
93: throughout the inner few disk scale-lengths, then the bar remains
94: rapidly rotating (here defined as the bar ending just inside its
95: corotation radius) for a long time. Thus the accurate measurement of
96: the bar pattern speed, $\om$, provides a way to discriminate whether
97: the central regions of the host galaxy are dominated by baryons or by
98: DM.
99:
100: Bar pattern speeds are most usefully parametrized by the
101: distance-independent ratio $\vpd = \lag / \len$, where $\lag$ is the
102: corotation radius and $\len$ the semi-major axis of the bar. Bars
103: which end near corotation ($1 \leq \vpd \leq 1.4$) are termed fast,
104: while shorter bars ($\vpd > 1.4$) are said to be slow.
105: %
106: The best way to determine the bar rotation parameter $\vpd$ is by
107: measuring $\om$ with the model-independent method developed by
108: Tremaine \& Weinberg (1984, hereafter TW). To date this method has
109: been used to measure $\om$ of mainly massive ($V_c \ga 150$ \kms)
110: early-type barred galaxies (see Corsini 2004 and references therein)
111: and it has been successfully tested against $N$-body simulations
112: (Debattista 2003; O'Neill \& Dubinski 2003). All measured bars are
113: compatible with being fast, implying that the inner regions of these
114: galaxies are not dominated by DM.
115: %
116: The only exception appears to be the slow bar in NGC~2915, a blue
117: compact dwarf galaxy, for which the TW method was applied to
118: H~{\scriptsize I} radio synthesis data (Bureau et al. 1999).
119:
120: The minimum possible amount of DM in disk galaxies can be determined
121: from the rotation curve, by scaling up the mass-to-light ratios of the
122: luminous components to fit the central velocity gradient (see Bosma
123: 1999 for a review). However, the lack of any obvious transition region
124: from the bulge/disk-dominated to the halo-dominated part of rotation
125: curves severely limits the ability to obtain a unique decomposition
126: and derive the central DM distribution (e.g., Corsini et al. 1999).
127: %
128: The structure of DM halos is more directly revealed in galaxies where
129: the luminous components are thought to give a nearly zero contribution
130: to the mass budget, because this makes mass modeling easier and the
131: derived DM distribution less uncertain. For this reason dwarf galaxies
132: were considered ideal targets for studying the properties of DM halos
133: and for testing if they have a central cuspy power-law mass density
134: distribution as predicted by cold dark matter (CDM) cosmology (Navarro
135: et al. 1996, 1997; Moore et al. 1998, 1999).
136: %
137: However, recent extensive studies have shown that in most of them the
138: contribution of the stellar disk can account for the inner rotation
139: curve and DM halos with a constant-density core provide a better fit
140: to than those with a density cusp (e.g., de Blok \& Bosma 2002;
141: Swaters et al. 2003; Spekkens et al. 2005).
142:
143: Nonetheless, the interpretation of these results has been
144: controversial because of possible observational systematic effects,
145: such as the poor spatial resolution of radio maps (van den Bosch \&
146: Swaters 2001) and slit misplacement in optical spectroscopy (Swaters
147: et al. 2003) as well as non-circular (Hayashi \& Navarro 2006), and
148: off-plane gas motions (Swaters et al. 2003b; Valenzuela et al. 2005).
149:
150: Since measurements of pattern speeds with the TW method do not require
151: high spatial resolution or slits passing exactly through the galaxy
152: center and refers to the stellar component only, such a measurement in
153: a dwarf disk galaxy can test unambiguously for the presence of a dense
154: DM cusp.
155: %
156: In the present Letter we attempt such a measurement for NGC~4431.
157:
158:
159: \section{NGC 4431}
160: \label{sec:n4431}
161:
162: NGC~4431 (VCC 1010) is a small ($1\farcm7\times1\farcm1$ [de
163: Vaucouleurs et al. 1991, hereafter RC3]) and faint ($B_T=13.74$ [RC3])
164: nucleated dwarf galaxy (Binggeli et al. 1985) classified as dSB0/a by
165: Barazza et al. (2002) following an unsharp mask analysis of the
166: galaxy. The presence of a bar had earlier been missed by virtue of the
167: galaxy's low luminosity and the relatively small angle between the
168: bar's and disk's position angle (PA). Both the presence of a strong
169: bar and trailing arms (which are clearly visible in Fig. 3 of Barazza
170: et al. 2002) and the rotationally-supported kinematics (Simien
171: \& Prugniel 2002; Pedraz et al. 2002) are indicative of a genuine disk
172: galaxy. The total absolute magnitude of the galaxy is
173: $M_{B_T}^0=-17.41$ corrected for inclination and extinction (RC3) and
174: adopting a distance of 16.2 Mpc (Jerjen et al. 2004).
175: %
176: It is located close to the center of the Virgo cluster at a projected
177: distance of $\sim300$ kpc from M~87. Its closest neighbor in
178: projection is the dE6/dS0 galaxy NGC 4436, at a projected separation
179: of $3\farcm7$ or $\sim18$ kpc.
180:
181:
182: \section{Broad-band imaging}
183: \label{sec:imaging}
184:
185: Deep broad-band imaging of NGC~4431 was carried out with the Very
186: Large Telescope (VLT) at the European Southern Observatory on April 1,
187: 2000 as part of a project aimed at measuring distances, metallicities,
188: and ages of dwarf galaxies in the Virgo cluster. Details of
189: observations, data reduction, and analysis are reported elsewhere
190: (Barazza et al. 2003; Jerjen et al. 2004).
191:
192: We analyzed the $R-$band image of NGC~4431 obtained by Barazza et
193: al. (2003), with foreground stars and background galaxies subtracted.
194: %
195: We fitted ellipses to galaxy isophotes with the {\tt
196: IRAF}\footnote{{\tt IRAF} is distributed by NOAO, which is operated by
197: AURA Inc., under contract with the National Science Foundation} task
198: {\tt ELLIPSE}, after masking the northeastern part of the image to
199: minimize the light contamination from NGC 4436, the outskirts of which
200: fall in the field of view of the image. We first fitted ellipses
201: allowing their centers to vary to test whether patchy dust obscuration
202: and tidal deformations were present. Having found no evidence of
203: varying ellipse centers within the errors of the fits for the inner
204: $40''$ we concluded that in these regions there is little or uniform
205: obscuration and no tidal deformations, and that the galaxy is a viable
206: candidate for the TW method. At larger radii, the shift of ellipse
207: centers ($\approx1''$) of NGC 4431 in the direction of NGC 4436 may be
208: due to the interaction between the two galaxies. The ellipse fits were
209: then repeated with the ellipse center fixed and the resulting surface
210: brightness profile is plotted in Fig. 1d. The inclination
211: ($i=48\fdg7\pm1\fdg5$) and disk PA ($\rm PA_{\it
212: disk}=6\fdg9\pm1\fdg0$) were determined by averaging the values
213: measured between $50''$ and $70''$. They are consistent within the
214: errors with values obtained by fitting ellipses with free centers.
215:
216: We measured $\len$ (Fig. 1) using four independent methods based on
217: Fourier amplitudes (Aguerri et al. 2000), Fourier and ellipse phases
218: (Debattista et al. 2002), and a parametric decomposition of the
219: surface brightness profile (Prieto et al. 2001). The mean of the
220: resulting values is our best estimate of $\len$ and we assume the
221: largest deviation from the mean as our error estimate
222: ($\len=21\farcs9\pm1\farcs5$). The bar length is in agreement with the
223: radius where the spiral arms seen in the unsharp mask image of Barazza
224: et al. (2002) start.
225:
226:
227: \section{Long-slit spectroscopy}
228: \label{sec:spectroscopy}
229:
230: The spectroscopic observations of NGC 4431 were carried out in service
231: mode at VLT on May 4-6, 2003 (run 1), April 21-22, 2004 (run 2) and
232: May 18-23, 2004 (run 3).
233: %
234: The Focal Reducer Low Dispersion Spectrograph 2 (FORS2) mounted the
235: volume-phased holographic grism GRIS\_1400V$+$18 with 1400 $\rm
236: grooves\;mm^{-1}$ and the $0\farcs7\,\times\,6\farcm8$ slit.
237: %
238: The detector was a mosaic of 2 MIT/LL CCDs. Each CCD had
239: $2048\times2068$ pixels of $15\,\times\,15$ $\mu$m$^2$. The wavelength
240: range from 4560 to 5860 \AA\ was covered with a reciprocal dispersion
241: of 0.645 \AA\ pixel$^{-1}$ and a spatial scale of 0.250 arcsec
242: pixel$^{-1}$ after a $2\times2$ pixel binning.
243: %
244: We obtained spectra with the slit at $\rm PA=7\fdg9$ crossing the
245: galaxy center ($3\times45$ minutes in run 1) and offset by $5\farcs0$
246: eastward ($4\times30$ minutes in run 3). We also obtained spectra with
247: the slit at $\rm PA=6\fdg9$ and shifted by $5\farcs0$ eastward
248: ($2\times40$ minutes in run 2; $2\times40$ minutes in run 3) and
249: westward ($4\times40$ minutes in run 3) with respect to the galaxy
250: nucleus. Two different PAs were chosen for the slits to test for the
251: sensitivity of the TW measurement to the $\sim 1^\circ$ uncertainty in
252: $\rm PA_{\it disk}$.
253: %
254: Comparison lamp exposures obtained for each observing night ensured
255: accurate wavelength calibrations. Spectra of G and K giant stars
256: served as kinematical templates. The average seeing FWHM was
257: $1\farcs2$ in run 1, $0\farcs8$ in run 2, and $0\farcs9$ in run 3.
258: %
259: Using standard {\tt MIDAS}\footnote{{\tt MIDAS} is developed and
260: maintained by the European Southern Observatory.} routines, all the
261: spectra were bias subtracted, flat-field corrected, cleaned of cosmic
262: rays, corrected for bad pixels, and wavelength calibrated as in
263: Debattista et al. (2002). The accuracy of the wavelength rebinning
264: ($\approx1$ \kms) was checked by measuring wavelengths of the
265: brightest night-sky emission lines. The instrumental resolution was
266: $1.45\pm0.01$ \AA\ (FWHM) corresponding to $\sigma_{\it inst} = 35$
267: \kms\ at 5170 \AA .
268: %
269: The spectra obtained in the same run along the same position were
270: co-added using the center of the stellar continuum as reference. In
271: the resulting spectra the sky contribution was determined by
272: interpolating along the outermost $\approx30''$ at the edges of the
273: slit and then subtracted.
274:
275:
276: \section{Pattern speed of the bar}
277: \label{sec:pattern}
278:
279: To measure the pattern speed of the bar, $\om$, we used the TW
280: method. For slits parallel to the disk major-axis, this relates the
281: luminosity-weighted mean position, $\pin$, to the luminosity-weighted
282: mean velocity $\kin = \pin \om \sin i$ where $i$ is the galaxy
283: inclination.
284:
285: To measure $\kin$ for each slit, we first collapsed the
286: two-dimensional spectrum along its spatial direction between $-90''$
287: and $+90''$ in the wavelength range between 5220 and 5540 \AA,
288: obtaining a one-dimensional spectrum. The value of $\kin$ was then
289: derived by fitting the resulting spectrum with the convolution of the
290: spectrum of the G0III star SAO119458 and a Gaussian line-of-sight
291: velocity profile by means of the Fourier Correlation Quotient method
292: (Bender 1990, hereafter FCQ) as done in Aguerri et al. (2003,
293: hereafter ADC03). We estimated uncertainties by Monte Carlo
294: simulations with photon, read-out and sky noise. As a precision check
295: we analyzed separately the two eastward-offset spectra ($Y=+5\farcs0$)
296: which were obtained with the slit at $\rm PA=6\fdg9$ in run 2 and 3,
297: respectively. The two resulting estimates of $\kin$ are in agreement
298: within the errors (Fig. 2).
299: %
300: To compute $\pin$ for each slit, we extracted the luminosity profile
301: from the $R-$band image along the position of the slit after
302: convolving the image to the seeing of the spectrum. The $R-$band
303: profile matches very well that obtained by collapsing the spectrum
304: along the wavelength direction, supporting that the slit was placed as
305: intended. We used the $R-$band profiles to compute $\pin$ because they
306: are less noisy than those extracted from the spectra, particularly at
307: large radii. By comparing the slits at $\rm PA=6\fdg9$ and at $\rm
308: PA=7\fdg9$ we also verified that the error introduced by the $\sim
309: 1^\circ$ uncertainty in disk PA is small for both $\pin$ and $\kin$.
310: %
311: We obtained $\om$ by fitting a straight line to the values of $\pin$
312: and $\kin$ to the data for slits at $Y=\pm5\farcs0$ and $\rm
313: PA=6\fdg9$ and at $Y=0''$ and $\rm PA=7\fdg9$ (Fig. 2). Although the
314: $Y=0''$ slit was obtained at different PA, this slit constrains only
315: the zero point (i.e., systemic) velocity and any slit passing through
316: the center can be used. This gives $\om \sin{i} = 5.56
317: \pm 1.39$ \kms\ arcsec$^{-1}$ ($70.8 \pm 17.7 $ \kms\ kpc$^{-1}$).
318:
319: We used the FCQ to measure the line-of-sight velocity curve and
320: velocity dispersion profile of the stellar component along the major
321: axis (Fig. 3). Our measurements at $\rm PA=6\fdg9$ are in agreement
322: within errors with those by Simien \& Prugniel (2002) at $\rm
323: PA=6^\circ$.
324: %
325: We derived the circular velocity in the disk region, $V_c = 94\pm19$
326: \kms, after a standard correction for the asymmetric drift as in
327: ADC03. This value is in agreement with the circular velocity derived
328: from the Tully-Fisher relation calculated in the $R-$band by Courteau
329: (1997). Thus the corotation radius of the bar is $\lag = V_c/\om =
330: 12\farcs7_{-2.9}^{+4.3}$ and the ratio of the corotation radius to the
331: bar semi-major axis $\vpd \equiv \lag/\len = 0.6_{-0.4}^{+1.2}$. The
332: error intervals on $\lag$ and $\vpd$ are $99\%$ confidence level and
333: were measured with Monte Carlo simulations as in ADC03.
334: %
335: By excluding the possibility that $\lag/\len < 1.0$ as this is thought
336: to be unphysical (Contopoulos 1980) we estimated that the probability
337: that the bar ends close to its corotation radius (i.e., $1.0 \leq
338: \lag/\len \leq 1.4$) is $72\%$. This was calculated via Monte Carlo
339: simulations by assuming a uniform distribution of $a_B$ and $V_c$ and
340: Gaussian distribution of $\om$ within their error ranges.
341:
342:
343: \section{Discussion}
344: \label{sec:discussion}
345:
346: By measuring the bar pattern speed of NGC~4431 we have demonstrated
347: that the TW method is feasible using stars as tracer for dwarf
348: galaxies.
349: %
350: So far, this technique has been applied only to bright barred galaxies
351: with the result that all the measured bars are consistent with being
352: rapidly rotating (see Corsini 2004 for a review).
353: %
354: For NGC 4431 we find a bar suggestive of being fast at $72\%$
355: probability, although the measurement uncertainties in this galaxy
356: preclude a stronger statement.
357:
358: As discussed by Debattista (2003) and Debattista
359: \& Williams (2004), the TW measurement of $\om$ is particularly
360: sensitive to errors in the PA$_{\it disk}$.
361: %
362: However, this is unlike to be an issue for NGC~4431. In fact, the
363: values of $\pin$ and $\kin$ measured in the offset position at
364: $Y=+5\farcs0$ from the spectrum at $\rm PA=7\fdg9$ are in agreement
365: within the errors with those from the two spectra at $\rm PA=6\fdg9$.
366: So, the fact that the value of the bar speed parameter of NGC~4431 is
367: nominally less than unity cannot be attributed to the uncertainty on
368: PA$_{\it disk}$ but to the scatter in the values of $\pin$ and $\kin$.
369:
370: A fast bar in NGC~4431 would suggest a common formation mechanism of
371: the bar both in bright and dwarf galaxies. If disks were previously
372: stabilized by massive DM halos, we exclude that these bars were
373: produced by tidal interactions because they would be slowly rotating
374: (Noguchi 1999).
375: %
376: But, this is not the case even for galaxies, like NGC~4431 and the SB0
377: NGC~1023 (Debattista et al. 2002) which show signs of weak interaction
378: with a close companion, without being significantly perturbed. This
379: finding allows us to conclude that there is no difference between TW
380: measurements in isolated or mildly interacting barred galaxies (ADC03;
381: Corsini et al. 2003).
382:
383: According to high-resolution $N$-body simulations of bars in
384: cosmologically motivated, CDM halos (see Debattista 2006 for a review)
385: a fast bar would imply that NGC~4431 has a massive disk and does not
386: reside inside a centrally-concentrated DM halo.
387: %
388: This is in agreement with other studies of dwarf galaxies (Swaters
389: 1999; de Blok et al. 2001; McGaugh et al. 2001; de Blok \& Bosma 2002;
390: Marchesini et al. 2002; Swaters et al. 2003; Spekkens et al. 2005) who
391: analyzed the ionized-gas rotation curves of up to about $200$
392: objects. By assuming minimal disks and spherical symmetry most of the
393: data are better described by DM halos with an inner density core
394: rather than the cusp predicted by CDM.
395:
396: However, there is no consensus whether these results based on gas
397: dynamics represent an actual problem for the CDM paradigm or whether
398: they could be reconciled with it by taking a variety of observational
399: uncertainties (e.g., slit positioning, spatial resolution), analysis
400: problems (e.g., binning and folding of the rotation curves), and
401: modelling assumptions (e.g., non-circular and off-planar gas motions)
402: into account (de Blok et al. 2003; Swaters et al. 2003; Spekkens et
403: al. 2005). Therefore, we argue that the ongoing debate will benefit
404: from stellar dynamics to constrain the inner mass distribution of DM
405: with the direct measurement of $\om$ in a sample of dwarf barred
406: galaxies by means of integral-field spectroscopy.
407:
408:
409: \bigskip
410: \noindent
411: {\bf Acknowledgments.}
412:
413: \noindent
414: EMC and AP receive support from the grant PRIN2005/32 by
415: Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) and from the grant
416: CPDA068415/06 by the Padua University.
417: %
418: JALA has been funded by the Spanish DGES, grant AYA-2004-08260-C03-01.
419: %
420: VPD is supported by a Brooks Prize Fellowship in Astrophysics at the
421: University of Washington and receives partial support from NSF ITR
422: grant PHY-0205413.
423: %
424: FDB acknowledges support from the LTSA grant NAG5-13063 and from the
425: NSF grant AST-0607748.
426: %
427: VPD and EMC acknowledge the Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias
428: for hospitality while this paper was in progress.
429:
430: \bigskip
431: \noindent
432:
433: \clearpage
434:
435: \begin{thebibliography}{}
436:
437:
438: \bibitem[]{422} Aguerri J. A. L., Mu\~noz-Tu\~n\'on C., Varela A. M.,
439: \& Prieto M. 2000, \aap, 361, 841
440:
441: \bibitem[]{425} Aguerri, J.\ A.\ L., Debattista, V.\ P., Corsini, E.\ M.\
442: 2003, \mnras, 338, 465 (ADC03)
443:
444: \bibitem[]{428} Athanassoula, E. 2003, \mnras, 341, 1179
445:
446: \bibitem[]{430} Barazza, F.\ D., Binggeli, B., \& Jerjen, H.\ 2002, \aap,
447: 391, 823
448:
449: \bibitem[]{433} Barazza, F.\ D., Binggeli, B., \& Jerjen, H.\ 2003, \aap,
450: 407, 121
451:
452: \bibitem[]{436} Bender, R. 1990, \aap, 229, 441
453:
454: \bibitem[]{438} Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.~A.\ 1985,
455: \aj, 90, 1681
456:
457: \bibitem[]{441} Bosma, A. 1999, in Galaxy Dynamics, eds. D. Merritt,
458: J. A. Sellwood, \& M. Valluri, ASP Conf. Ser. 182,
459: (San Francisco: ASP), p. 339
460:
461: \bibitem[]{900} Bureau, M., Freeman, K.~C., Pfitzner, D.~W., \& Meurer, G.~R.\
462: 1999, \aj, 118, 215
463:
464: \bibitem[]{445} Corsini, E.\ M., 2004, in Baryons in Dark Matter
465: Halos, eds. R. Dettmar, U. Klein, \& P. Salucci,
466: (Trieste: SISSA)
467: p. 49.1
468:
469: \bibitem[]{450} Corsini, E.~M., et al.\ 1999, \aap, 342, 671
470:
471: \bibitem[]{901} Corsini, E.\ E., Debattista, V.\ P., Aguerri, J.\ A.\ L.\
472: 2003, \apj, 599, L29
473:
474: \bibitem[]{452} Courteau, S.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 2402
475:
476: \bibitem[]{454} Contopoulos, G.\ 1980, \aap, 81, 198
477:
478: \bibitem[]{456} Debattista, V.~P., 2003, \mnras, 342, 1194
479:
480: \bibitem[]{458} Debattista, V.~P., 2006, in New Horizons in Astronomy,
481: eds. S. Kannappan et al., ASP Conf. Ser. 352 (San Francisco:
482: ASP), p. 161
483:
484: \bibitem[]{462} Debattista, V.~P., \& Sellwood, J.~A., 1998, \apj, 493, L5
485:
486: \bibitem[]{464} Debattista, V.~P., \& Sellwood, J.~A., 2000, \apj, 543, 704
487:
488: \bibitem[]{466} Debattista, V.~P., \& Williams, T.~B., 2004, \apj, 605, 714
489:
490: \bibitem[]{468} Debattista, V.~P., Corsini, E.~M., \& Aguerri, J.~A.~L.
491: 2002, \mnras, 332, 65
492:
493: \bibitem[]{471} de Blok, W.~J.~G., McGaugh, S., \& Rubin, V.~C.\ 2001, \aj,
494: 122, 2396
495:
496: \bibitem[]{474} de Blok, W.~J.~G., \& Bosma, A.\ 2002, \aap, 385, 816
497:
498: \bibitem[]{476} de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin Jr., H. G.,
499: Buta, R. J., Paturel, G., \& Fouqu\`e, P. 1991,
500: Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (New York:
501: Springer) (RC3)
502:
503: \bibitem[]{481} Eskridge, P., et al.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 563
504:
505: \bibitem[]{483} Hayashi, E., \& Navarro, J. F. 2006, \mnras, 373, 1117
506:
507: \bibitem[]{485} Knapen J. H., Shlosman, I., \& Peletier, R. F. 2000, ApJ,
508: 529, 93
509:
510: \bibitem[]{488} Jerjen, H., Binggeli, B., \& Barazza, F.\ D.\
511: 2004, \aj, 127, 771
512:
513: \bibitem[]{491} Marinova, I., \& Jogee, S. 2006, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0608039)
514:
515: \bibitem[]{493} Marchesini, D., D'Onghia, E., Chincarini, G., Firmani, C.,
516: Conconi, P., Molinari, E., \& Zacchei, A.\ 2002, \apj,
517: 575, 801
518:
519: \bibitem[]{497} McGaugh, S., Rubin, V.~C., \& de Blok, W.~J.~G. 2001, \aj,
520: 122, 2381
521:
522: \bibitem[]{500} Moore, B., Governato, F., Quinn, T., Stadel, J.,
523: \& Lake, G.\ 1998, \apjl, 499, L5
524:
525: \bibitem[]{503} Moore, B., Quinn, T., Governato, F., Stadel, J.,
526: \& Lake, G.\ 1999, \mnras, 310, 1147
527:
528: \bibitem[]{506} Navarro, J.~F., Frenk, C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\
529: 1996, \apj, 462, 563
530:
531: \bibitem[]{509} Navarro, J.~F., Frenk, C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\
532: 1997, \apj, 490, 493
533:
534: \bibitem[]{512} Noguchi, M.\ 1999, \apj, 514, 77
535:
536: \bibitem[]{514} O'Neill, J.~K., Dubinski, J.\ 2003, \mnras, 346, 251
537:
538: \bibitem[]{516} Pedraz, S., Gorgas, J., Cardiel, N., S\'anchez-Bl\'azquez,
539: P., \& Guzm\'an, R.\ 2002, \mnras, 332, L59
540:
541: \bibitem[]{519} Prieto, M., Aguerri, J.~A.~L., Varela, A.~M., \&
542: Mu\~ noz-Tu\~n\'on, C. 2001, \aap, 367, 405
543:
544: \bibitem[]{522} Sellwood, J.~A., \& Debattista, V.~P., 2006, \apj,
545: 639, 868
546:
547: \bibitem[]{525} Simien, F., \& Prugniel, P.\ 2002, \aap, 384, 371
548:
549: \bibitem[]{527} Spekkens, K., Giovanelli, R., \& Haynes, M. P. H. 2005,
550: \aj, 129, 2119
551:
552: \bibitem[]{530} Swaters, R.~A., 1999, PhD thesis, University of
553: Groningen
554:
555: \bibitem[]{533} Swaters, R.~A., Madore, B.~F., van den Bosch,
556: F.~C., \& Balcells, M.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 732
557:
558: \bibitem[]{536} Tremaine, S., \& Weinberg, M.~D., 1984, \apj, 282, L5
559:
560: \bibitem[]{538} Valenzuela, O., Rhee, G., Klypin, A., Governato, F., Stinson,
561: G., Quinn, T.; Wadsley, J.\ 2005, \apj, submitted
562: (astro-ph/0509644)
563:
564: \bibitem[]{542} van den Bosch, F.~C., \& Swaters, R.~A.\ 2001,
565: \mnras, 325, 1017
566:
567: \bibitem[]{545} Weinberg, M.~D., 1985, \mnras, 213, 451
568:
569: \end{thebibliography}
570:
571: \clearpage
572:
573: \begin{figure}
574: \plotone{f1.eps}
575: \caption{Bar semi-major axis length of NGC 4431. {\it (a)\/}
576: Phase angle of $m=2$ Fourier component. {\it (b)\/} Bar/interbar
577: intensity ratio. {\it (c)\/} PA of the deprojected isophotal
578: ellipses. {\it (d)\/} Surface brightness decomposition in bulge
579: (dashed line), disk (dotted line), and bar (dashed-dotted line). The
580: vertical lines show the value of $\len$ obtained with each model.}
581: \end{figure}
582:
583: \clearpage
584:
585: \begin{figure}
586: \plotone{f2.eps}
587: \caption{Pattern speed of the bar in NGC~4431. The kinematic
588: integrals ${\cal V}$ are plotted as a function of the photometric
589: integrals ${\cal X}$. The best fitting straight line has a slope
590: $\om \sin{i} = 5.56 \pm 1.39$ \kms\ arcsec$^{-1}$. Open circles
591: correspond to slits at $\rm PA=7\fdg9$ ($Y=0''$ and
592: $Y=+5\farcs0$), while filled circles are for slits at $\rm
593: PA=6\fdg9$ ($Y = \pm5\farcs0$).}
594: \end{figure}
595:
596: \clearpage
597:
598: \begin{figure}
599: \plotone{f3.eps}
600: \caption{{\it (a)\/} The major-axis radial profile of the stellar
601: line-of-sight velocity dispersion fitted with an exponential
602: profile at $r\geq15''$ (solid line).
603: %
604: {\it (b)\/} The major-axis radial profile of the stellar line-of-sight
605: velocity (after subtracting the systemic velocity $V_{\it
606: sys\/}=948\pm3$ \kms) and the $V_c \sin{i}$ curve (solid line)
607: with errors (dotted lines) obtained by applying the asymmetric drift for
608: $r\geq15''$ as in ADC03.
609: %
610: In {\it (a)\/} and {\it (b)\/} the measured profiles are folded
611: around the center, with filled circles and asterisks referring to
612: the N (receding) and S (approaching) sides, respectively.}
613: \end{figure}
614:
615: \end{document}
616: