1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %\usepackage{graphicx}
5: %\usepackage{psfig}
6: %\usepackage{subeqn}
7: %\usepackage{amsmath}
8: %\usepackage[alpha,z,expert]
9: %\usepackage[hypertex]{hyperref}
10:
11: \def \th {\thinspace}
12: \def \nh {N${\rm _H}$}
13: \def \ergsec{\hbox{erg s$^{-1}$}}
14: \def \arcmin {\hbox{$^\prime$}}
15: \def \arcsec {\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
16: \def \chisq {$\chi ^{2}$}
17: \def\spose#1{\hbox to 0pt{#1\hss}}
18: \def\ltsim{$\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}
19: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$<$}}$\thinspace}
20: \def\gtsim{$\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}
21: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$>$}}$\thinspace}
22: %\def \ref {\reference{}}
23: \def \msun {${\rm M_\odot}$}
24: \def \mstar{${\rm M_\star}$}
25: \def \rvir{{\hbox{$r_{\rm vir}$}}}
26: \def \rs{{\hbox{$r_{\rm s}$}}}
27: \def \cvir{{\hbox{$c_{\rm vir}$}}}
28: \def \mvir{{\hbox{$M_{\rm vir}$}}}
29: \def \mgas{{\hbox{$M_{\rm gas}$}}}
30: \def \mdm{{\hbox{$M_{\rm dm}$}}}
31: \def \lcdm{{\hbox{$\Lambda$CDM}}}
32: \newcommand\solar{\hbox{{$Z_{\odot}$}}}
33: \def \degmark{^\circ}
34: \def \nh {$N_{\rm H}$}
35: \def \deg {$^\circ$}
36: \def \eg {e.g.}
37: \def \etc {etc}
38: \def \ie {i.e.}
39: \def \cf {c.f.}
40: \def \dtwentyfive {${\rm D_{25}}$}
41: \renewcommand{\labelitemi}{--}
42: \newcommand{\source}{\mbox{XMMU\,J131359.7--162735}}
43: \newcommand{\first}{${\rm 1^{st}}$}
44: \newcommand{\second}{${\rm 2^{nd}}$}
45: \newcommand{\third}{${\rm 3^{rd}}$}
46: \newcommand{\fourth}{${\rm 4^{th}}$}
47: \newcommand{\fifth}{${\rm 5^{th}}$}
48: \newcommand{\sixth}{${\rm 6^{th}}$}
49: \newcommand{\seventh}{${\rm 7^{th}}$}
50: \newcommand{\eighth}{${\rm 8^{th}}$}
51: \newcommand{\ninth}{${\rm 9^{th}}$}
52: \newcommand{\tenth}{${\rm 10^{th}}$}
53: \newcommand{\sersic}{S\'{e}rsic}
54: \newcommand{\apec}{APEC}
55: \newcommand{\mekal}{MEKAL}
56: \newcommand{\hnought}{${\rm H_0}$}
57: \newcommand{\rhog}{${\rho_g}$}
58: \newcommand{\zfe }{${\rm Z_{Fe}}$}
59: \newcommand{\zo }{${\rm Z_{O}}$}
60: \newcommand{\zsi }{${\rm Z_{Si}}$}
61: \newcommand{\zni }{${\rm Z_{Ni}}$}
62: \newcommand{\zs }{${\rm Z_{S}}$}
63: \newcommand{\zne }{${\rm Z_{Ne}}$}
64: \newcommand{\zmg }{${\rm Z_{Mg}}$}
65: \newcommand{\feh } {${\rm [Fe/H]}$}
66: \newcommand{\emiss } {$\Lambda(T,Z_{\rm Fe})$}
67: \newcommand{\chandra }{{\em Chandra}}
68: \newcommand{\xspec }{{\em Xspec}}
69: \newcommand{\acis }{{\em ACIS}}
70: \newcommand{\ciao }{{\em CIAO}}
71: \newcommand{\caldb }{{\em Caldb}}
72: \newcommand{\heasoft }{{\em Heasoft}}
73: \newcommand{\fxunits}{\mbox{ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}}
74: \newcommand{\lxunits}{\mbox{ergs s$^{-1}$}}
75: \newcommand{\xmm }{{\em XMM}}
76: \newcommand{\asca }{{\em ASCA}}
77: \newcommand{\rosat }{{\em ROSAT}}
78: \newcommand{\exosat }{{\em EXOSAT}}
79: \newcommand{\einstein }{{\em Einstein}}
80: \newcommand{\sax }{{\em Beppo-SAX}}
81: \newcommand{\lx }{${\rm L_X}$}
82: \newcommand{\tx }{${\rm T_X}$}
83: \newcommand\lk{\hbox{{$L_{\rm K}$}}}
84: \newcommand\lb{\hbox{{$L_{\rm B}$}}}
85: \newcommand{\lsun }{${\rm L_\odot}$}
86: \newcommand{\leda}{{\em{LEDA}}}
87: \newcommand{\ned}{{\em{NED}}}
88: \newcommand{\heasarc }{{\em HEASARC}\footnote{ftp://legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov}}
89: \newcommand{\twomass}{{\em 2MASS}}
90: \def \dtwentyfive {${\rm D_{25}}$}
91: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
92: \newcommand{\myemail}{gasta@uci.edu}
93: \newcommand{\thin}{\thinspace}
94: \newcommand\omegam{\hbox{{$\Omega_{\rm m}$}}}
95: \newcommand\omegalambda{\hbox{{$\Omega_{\Lambda}$}}}
96: \newcommand\kmsmpc{{\rm km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$}}
97: \newcommand\ho{\hbox{{$H_{0}$}}}
98: \slugcomment{Submitted Nov 27, 2006; Accepted March 16, 2007 for publication in the \rm{Astrophysical Journal}}
99: \shorttitle{\xmm\ discovery of a cluster of galaxies at $\MakeLowercase{z}=0.28$}
100: \shortauthors{Gastaldello et~al.}
101:
102: %--------------------- TITLE & ABSTRACT ----------------------------------
103: %
104:
105: \begin{document}
106:
107: \title{Serendipitous \emph{XMM-Newton} discovery of a cluster of galaxies at
108: $\MakeLowercase{z}=0.28$}
109:
110: \author {Fabio Gastaldello\altaffilmark{1},
111: David A. Buote\altaffilmark{1},
112: Philip J. Humphrey\altaffilmark{1},
113: Luca Zappacosta\altaffilmark{1},
114: Marc S. Seigar\altaffilmark{1},
115: Aaron J. Barth\altaffilmark{1},
116: Fabrizio Brighenti\altaffilmark{2,3},
117: \& William G. Mathews\altaffilmark{2}
118: }
119: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
120: California at Irvine, 4129
121: Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-4575}
122: \altaffiltext{2}{UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California at Santa Cruz,
123: 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
124: \altaffiltext{3}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Bologna, via
125: Ranzani 1, Bologna 40127, Italy}
126: \begin{abstract}
127: We report the discovery of a galaxy cluster serendipitously
128: detected as an extended X-ray source in an offset observation of
129: the group NGC 5044. The cluster redshift, $z$=0.281, determined from the
130: optical spectrum of the brightest cluster galaxy, agrees with that inferred
131: from the X-ray spectrum using the Fe K$\alpha$ complex of the hot ICM
132: ($z=0.27\pm0.01$).
133: Based on the 50\,ks \xmm~observation, we find that within a radius of 383
134: kpc the cluster has an unabsorbed \mbox{X-ray} flux,
135: $f_{\rm X}\,(0.5-2\,{\rm{keV}})=(3.34^{+0.08}_{-0.13}) \times 10^{-13}$
136: \fxunits, a bolometric \mbox{X-ray} luminosity,
137: $L_{\rm X}=(2.21^{+0.34}_{-0.19}) \times 10^{44}$ \lxunits,
138: $kT=3.57\pm0.12$\,keV, and metallicity, $0.60\pm0.09$ \solar.
139: The cluster obeys the scaling relations for $L_{\rm X}$ and $T$ observed at
140: intermediate redshift.
141: The mass derived from an isothermal NFW model fit is,
142: $M_{\rm vir} = 3.89\pm0.35 \times10^{14}$ \msun, with a concentration
143: parameter, $c = 6.7\pm0.4$, consistent with the range of values
144: expected in the concordance cosmological model for relaxed clusters.
145: The optical properties suggest this could be a ``fossil cluster''.
146: \end{abstract}
147:
148: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- \mbox{X-ray}s: general}
149:
150: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
151: \section{Introduction}
152: \label{Introduction}
153: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
154:
155: Galaxy groups and low mass clusters ($T < 4$ keV) are
156: starting to be detected and analyzed in detail in the X-ray band
157: at intermediate redshift $0.2 < z < 0.6$ \citep[e.g.,][]{willis05,jeltema06}.
158: These objects are more likely to display the effects of
159: non-gravitational energy injection into the intracluster medium (ICM) than
160: hotter, more massive, clusters \citep[e.g.,][]{voit05b}.
161: The study of extended X-ray
162: objects over a broad temperature range at $z> 0.2$ will provide
163: important insight into the evolution of their hot gas and the
164: deviation of X-ray scaling relations from simple, self-similar expectations.
165: Studies of objects in the redshift range $0.2 < z < 0.6$ with
166: $kT \sim 2-3$ keV already suggest that they are less
167: dynamically evolved than their counterparts at $z=0$ \citep{mulch06}.
168:
169: The combination of surveys specifically designed to detect clusters
170: \citep[e.g. the \xmm-LSS,][]{pierre04}, with serendipitous observations,
171: which can make use of deeper exposures, will further advance the knowledge in
172: this field.
173: Here we present the discovery of a cluster at the redshift of $z=0.281$,
174: serendipitously observed during an offset observation of the nearby group
175: NGC 5044. All distance-dependent quantities have been computed assuming
176: \ho = 70 \kmsmpc, \omegam = 0.3 and \omegalambda = 0.7.
177: At the redshift of $z=0.281$, 1\arcmin\ corresponds to 255 kpc. All the errors
178: quoted are at the 68\% confidence limit.
179:
180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
181: \section{\mbox{X-ray} Analysis}
182: \label{x-ray}
183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
184:
185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
186: \begin{figure*}[t]
187: \parbox{0.5\textwidth}{
188: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{f1a.ps}}
189: }
190: \parbox{0.5\textwidth}{
191: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{f1b.ps}}
192: }
193: \caption{\label{fig.1} \footnotesize
194: {\em Left:} Exposure corrected 0.5-2.0 keV combined MOS1 and MOS 2 X-ray
195: image of the observed offset field of NGC 5044. The cluster \source\
196: is clearly visible as the extended source.
197: {\em Right:} The $V$ band image
198: with the smoothed X-ray contours overlaid and logarithmically spaced between 2 and 37
199: cts/pixel. Coordinates are J2000. The red circle shows the FWHM (6.7\arcsec) of the \xmm\ MOS PSF at the off-axis angle of the source. }
200: \end{figure*}
201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
202:
203: The object \source\ was detected in an offset observation of
204: the group NGC 5044 (obsID 0301290101) performed on 6 January 2006.
205: The source (see Fig.\ref{fig.1}) is located at 4.7\arcmin\ off-axis, and it is
206: clearly extended on a $\sim2$ arc-minute scale. The X-ray centroid of
207: \source\ in equatorial coordinates is
208: \mbox{$\alpha_{\rm J2000.0}=13^{\rm h}13^{\rm
209: m}59.7^{\rm s},\, \delta_{\rm J2000.0}=-16^{\circ}27^{\rm m}35^{\rm s}$}.
210:
211: The data were reduced with SAS v7.0.0 using the tasks
212: {\em emchain} and {\em epchain}. We considered only event patterns
213: 0-12 for MOS and 0 for pn. We cleaned the data using the standard
214: procedures: bright pixels and hot columns were removed by applying the
215: expression FLAG == 0, and we corrected for pn out-of-time events.
216: Periods of high background due to soft protons were filtered as in
217: \citet{gast06a}; the observation was very mildly affected by flares
218: leading to only $\sim 5$ ks of lost data, with net exposures of
219: 52, 50 and 45 ks respectively for MOS1, MOS2 and pn.
220:
221: For each detector we created images in the 0.5-2 keV band with point sources
222: masked out using circular regions of 25\arcsec\ radius centered at each source
223: position. The images have been exposure-corrected, and a radial surface
224: brightness profile was extracted
225: from a circular region of 6\arcmin\ radius positioned at the cluster
226: centroid. We account for the X-ray background and the emission of the NGC 5044
227: group by including a constant background component.
228: The data were grouped to
229: have at least 20 counts per bin in order to apply the $\chi^{2}$ statistic.
230: The fitted model is folded with the \xmm\ PSF at energy of 1 keV. The joint
231: best-fit $\beta$ model \citep{beta} has a core radius of
232: $r_c = 66\pm6$ kpc (15.5\arcsec$\pm1.4$\arcsec) and $\beta=0.54\pm0.01$ for
233: $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. = 465/273. Although formally
234: unacceptable, the surface brightness model well-describes the overall shape
235: of the profile, as evinced by the low fractional residuals (see
236: Fig.\ref{fig.2}).
237: Fits to the profiles of the individual
238: detectors give consistent results within $1\sigma$ of the combined-fit result.
239: If we use larger extraction regions, the emission by NGC 5044 can no longer
240: be treated as constant: if we account for the emission of NGC 5044 by adding
241: a second $\beta$ model at an offset of
242: 20.7\arcmin\ (the distance between the source and the emission peak of
243: NGC 5044) with $r_c = 48\arcsec$ and $\beta = 0.53$ \citep{buot03a}, the
244: resulting parameters for the source are consistent within the $1\sigma$ errors.
245:
246: We extracted spectra for each detector from a 1.5\arcmin\
247: circular region positioned at the centroid of the emission, chosen to
248: maximize the S/N over the background.
249: (Choosing an extraction radius of 2\arcmin\ does not change the spectral
250: parameters quoted below). Redistribution matrix files (RMFs) and
251: ancillary response files (ARFs) were generated using the SAS tasks
252: {\em rmfgen} and {\em arfgen}, the latter in extended source
253: mode. Appropriate flux-weighting was performed for RMFs, using our own
254: dedicated software, and for ARFs, using exposure-corrected images of
255: the source as detector maps (with pixel size of 1\arcmin, the minimum
256: scale modeled by {\em arfgen}) to sample the variation in emission,
257: following the prescription of \citet{saxton02}. The background was estimated
258: locally using spectra extracted from a 2\arcmin-3\arcmin\ annular region
259: positioned at the centroid of the emission; using a 3\arcmin-4\arcmin\
260: annulus gives results consistent within their $1\sigma$ errors.
261: We checked that vignetting corrections for the sky background components do
262: not affect the results by exploring the complementary approach of a
263: complete modeling of the background components (including the thermal
264: emission of NGC 5044) as in \citet{gast06a}: the spectral results obtained
265: are consistent with the ones quoted below within their $1\sigma$ errors.
266:
267: The spectra from the three detectors were re-binned to ensure a signal-to-noise
268: ratio of at least 3 and a minimum 20 counts per bin, and they were
269: jointly fitted with an \apec\ thermal plasma modified by Galactic
270: absorption \citep{dick90} . The spectral fitting was performed with
271: \xspec\ \citep[ver11.3.1,][]{xspec} and quoted metallicities are relative to
272: the abundances of \citet{grsa98}. We display the spectra in Fig.\ref{fig.3}.
273: The source photons correspond to about 77\% of the total events ($\sim 4400$
274: counts in each MOS and $\sim7700$ in the pn). An emission line is clearly
275: visible corresponding to the Fe K$\alpha$ complex emitted at a redshift of
276: $z=0.27\pm0.01$.
277: The redshift measured is in close agreement with the redshift of $z=0.2814$
278: determined optically from the spectrum of the brightest cluster galaxy
279: (see \S\ref{optical}). Fixing the redshift value to the optical determination
280: gives as best fit parameters, $T = 3.57\pm0.12$ keV, and, $Z=0.60\pm0.09$
281: \solar, for $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. = 486/463.
282:
283: Using the best-fit model, the unabsorbed flux within the aperture of
284: radius 1.5\arcmin\ (383 kpc) is
285: $3.34^{+0.08}_{-0.13}\times10^{-13}$ \fxunits\ in
286: the 0.5-2 keV band. This corresponds to an unabsorbed luminosity of
287: $7.57^{+0.10}_{-0.40}\times10^{43}$ \lxunits\ in the 0.5-2 keV band and to a
288: bolometric (0.01-100 keV) luminosity of $2.21^{+0.34}_{-0.19}\times10^{44}$
289: \lxunits. The quoted errors on flux and luminosity are obtained by \xspec\
290: using a Montecarlo procedure.
291:
292: To investigate possible spatial variation in the spectral
293: parameters of the cluster, we extracted two annular regions of radii
294: 0\arcmin-0.5\arcmin\ and 0.5\arcmin-1.5\arcmin. The derived spectral
295: parameters are: $T=3.64\pm0.14$ keV and $Z=0.66\pm0.13$ \solar\ with
296: $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. = 280/231 for the inner annulus; $T=3.48^{+0.19}_{-0.16}$
297: keV and $Z=0.52\pm0.13$ \solar\ with $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. = 280/271 for
298: the outer annulus. The width of the bins has been chosen in order to avoid
299: bias in the temperature measurements caused by scattered flux by the PSF
300: ( 80\% encircled energy fraction radius is 25\arcsec\ at 1.5 keV and at the
301: off-axis angle of the source).
302: The cluster is therefore consistent with being isothermal over the explored
303: radial range.
304:
305: \source\ was also serendipitously detected in the \rosat\ PSPC pointed
306: observation of NGC 5044 \citep[1WGA J1313.9-1627;][]{white94}, though it was
307: very close to the detector gaps. This is likely the reason why with \rosat\
308: the source appeared not to be extended and had a lower flux
309: ($1.75\pm0.14 \times 10^{-13}$ \fxunits\ in the 0.2-2 keV band).
310:
311: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
312: \begin{figure}[h]
313: \begin{center}
314: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth,angle=-90]{f2.ps}
315: \vskip 0.5cm
316: \caption{Surface brightness profile of the X-ray emission of \source. Data from MOS1, MOS2 and pn are plotted in green, red and black respectively. The best fit beta model and ratio of data over the model are also shown. The background level for PN and for one of the MOS are shown as black and green dashed lines respectively.}
317: \label{fig.2} \end{center}
318: \end{figure}
319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
320:
321: The cluster has regular X-ray isophotes and is centered on a dominant early
322: type galaxy (see \S\ref{optical}). These characteristics suggest the cluster
323: is relaxed and that hydrostatic equilibrium is a good approximation.
324: We calculated the total mass profile using two different models.
325: First, we used the best-fit $\beta$ model (see \S \ref{x-ray}) for which
326: the gas density and total mass profiles can be expressed by simple
327: analytical formula \citep[e.g.,][]{ettori00}.
328: We evaluated $r_{500}$ as the radius at which the density is 500 times the
329: the critical density and the virial radius as the radius at which the
330: density corresponds to $\Delta_{\rm{vir}}$, as obtained by \citet{bryan98} for
331: the concordance cosmological model used in this paper.
332: To evaluate the errors on the estimated quantities,
333: we repeat the measurements after 10000 random selections of a temperature and
334: parameters of the surface brightness profile, which were drawn from Gaussian
335: distributions with mean and variance in accordance with the best-fit results.
336: For $\Delta=500$ we obtained,
337: $M_{500} = (1.60\pm0.09) \times 10^{14}$ \msun\ within
338: $r_{500} = 750\pm14$ kpc;
339: the virial mass is, $M_{\rm{vir}}= (3.24\pm0.18)\times10^{14}$ \msun,
340: within the virial radius $r_{\rm{vir}} = 1511\pm29$ kpc.
341: Secondly, we fit the surface brightness profile
342: with an isothermal NFW model \citep{suto98}.
343: We obtain a concentration parameter,
344: $c=6.7\pm0.4$, virial radius $r_{\rm{vir}} = 1607^{+48}_{-42}$ kpc,
345: and virial mass $M_{\rm{vir}}=(3.89\pm0.35) \times10^{14}$ \msun, with
346: $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. = 424/273. The mass determinations using the two different
347: models are in agreement within the $1\sigma$ errors.
348:
349: %=====================================================================
350: % Optical DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA
351: %=====================================================================
352: \section{Optical Follow-up Observations}
353: \label{optical}
354:
355: A $V$-band and $I$-band image of the field were taken with the direct
356: imaging CCD on the 2.5-m du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory on
357: the night of 27 January 2006.
358: In both wavebands, 2$\times$300 s exposures were taken in clear, photometric
359: conditions.
360: Photometric zero-points and extinction corrections were determined by
361: observing three standard stars chosen from the \citet{landolt92} catalog.
362: %such that they spanned a wide range in airmass and optical color.
363: The images have been processed and cleaned of CCD defects and cosmic rays.
364: The $V$-band image
365: is shown with X-ray contours superposed in Fig.\ref{fig.1}. The image
366: reveals an over-density of galaxies and, in particular, a bright dominant
367: galaxy at the same location as the X-ray centroid.
368:
369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
370: \begin{figure}[t]
371: \begin{center}
372: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth,angle=-90]{f3.ps}
373: \caption{X-ray spectrum of the source taken from a 1.5\arcmin\ aperture positioned at the centroid of the emission. Data from MOS1, MOS2 and pn are plotted in green, red and black respectively. The best fit model and residuals are also shown.}
374: \label{fig.3} \end{center}
375: \end{figure}
376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
377:
378: Photometry was performed using SExtractor \citep{bertin96} with automatic
379: aperture magnitudes.
380: We plot in the top panel of
381: Fig.\ref{fig.4} the color-magnitude diagram of the galaxies detected
382: within 3.1\arcmin\ radius of the central galaxy (corresponding to 803 kpc,
383: half of the estimated virial radius): the horizontal dashed line corresponds
384: to the expected $V-I$ color of a passively evolving elliptical galaxy at
385: $z\sim0.28$, which is $V-I\sim1.6$ for a formation redshift, $z>5$
386: \citep{nelson02}.
387: The difference in magnitude between the central
388: galaxy ($m_I = 16.4$) and the likely cluster members is very close to the 2
389: magnitudes of the definition of fossil systems \citep{jones03}.
390: We have excluded three objects (triangles in Fig.\ref{fig.4}) because they are
391: likely members of the NGC 5044 group. A further two objects, which are within
392: 2 magnitudes of the BCG, are
393: very far from the cluster center (2.6\arcmin, 664 kpc, and 2.5\arcmin, 638
394: kpc, crosses in Fig.\ref{fig.4}).
395: A possible member is 1.9 magnitudes fainter
396: than the BCG at a distance of 1.8\arcmin\ (diamond in Fig.\ref{fig.4}).
397:
398: We obtained an optical spectrum of the central galaxy on the night of
399: 7 March 2006 UT, using the ESI spectrograph \citep{sheinis02} at
400: the Keck-II telescope. A 0\farcs75 slit width was used, giving a
401: spectral resolution of $\sim50$ km s$^{-1}$ (FWHM) and a pixel scale of
402: 11.4 km s$^{-1}$ pixel$^{-1}$. The galaxy was observed at airmass 1.25 for
403: 900 s in partly cloudy conditions, and the slit
404: was oriented at the parallactic angle. The spectrum was extracted
405: with a 1\arcsec\ extraction width, and wavelength calibrated and
406: flux-calibrated using an observation of the standard star Feige 34.
407: The individual echelle orders were combined into a single
408: spectrum.
409: The galaxy redshift was measured by performing a direct fit of a K3III
410: stellar spectrum (observed on the same night with ESI),
411: velocity-broadened by convolution with a Gaussian kernel. The
412: best-fitting model yields a recession velocity of $84360\pm19$ km
413: s$^{-1}$, or $z = 0.2814\pm0.0001$, in close agreement with the
414: redshift estimated from the X-ray observations.
415: The ESI spectrum is shown in the bottom panel of Fig.\ref{fig.4}.
416:
417: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
418: \begin{figure}
419: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.26\textwidth,angle=-90]{f4a.ps}}
420: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.28\textwidth,angle=-90]{f4b.ps}}
421: \caption{{\em Top:}
422: Color-magnitude diagram of the galaxies within 2.8\arcmin\ of \source.
423: The horizontal dashed line indicates the predicted color of a $z=0.28$ cluster
424: elliptical. The star indicates the BCG. Triangles indicate likely dwarf
425: members of NGC 5044
426: \citep[one of them is the object \#26 in the catalog of][]{ferguson90}.
427: Crosses indicate objects very far from the BCG (see text). The diamond
428: indicates the only other object within 2 magnitudes of the BGC.
429: {\em Bottom:}
430: A portion of the Keck ESI spectrum, binned to 2
431: \AA/pixel. Over-plotted in red is the elliptical galaxy template
432: spectrum from the spectral atlas of \citet{kinney96}.
433: \label{fig.4}}
434: \end{figure}
435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
436:
437: %=====================================================================
438: % DISCUSSION DISCUSSION DISCUSSION DISCUSSION DISCUSSION
439: %=====================================================================
440: \section{Discussion}
441: \label{discussion}
442:
443: This serendipitously discovered cluster obeys the scaling relations for
444: $L_{\rm X}$ and $T$ derived at
445: intermediate redshift. The aperture of 383 kpc used for spectroscopy encloses
446: 78.3\% of the flux within $r_{500}$, assuming the cluster emission profile
447: follows the $\beta$ model derived within that aperture.
448: The derived bolometric luminosity within $r_{500}$ is
449: $L_{500} = (2.82^{+0.43}_{-0.24}) \times 10^{44}$ \lxunits.
450: The derived $L_{500}$ is in good agreement with the $L-T$ relation found
451: for the sample of low redshift clusters ($z<0.09$) by \citet{mark98b},
452: the low-redshift groups ($z<0.03$) in the GEMS sample \citep{osmond04},
453: the six groups/poor clusters at intermediate redshift ($0.29<z<0.44$) in the
454: \xmm\ LSS survey \citep{willis05}, and the six groups/poor clusters
455: at intermediate redshift ($0.23<z<0.59$) in the sample of \citet{jeltema06}.
456:
457: The optical appearance of the cluster suggests tantalizing evidence that this
458: object may be one of the rare fossil clusters \citep[3\%-6\% of the total
459: number according to][]{milos06}. More detailed optical imaging and
460: spectroscopy are required to investigate this possibility.
461: The derived total magnitude for the BCG, corrected for Galactic extinction,
462: as well as for the $k$-correction \citep{fukugita95}, is $M_I = -24.78$,
463: which corresponds to $M_B = -22.38$ and $M_R = -24.05$, adopting colors
464: $B-I_J = 2.40$ and $R_J-I_J = 0.73$ \citep{fukugita95}.
465: The BCG of \source\ is among the most luminous in the sample
466: of BCGs in fossil systems of \citet{khosroshahi06}. The measured values of
467: $L_B$ of the BCG and $L_X$ put the object very close to the locus of baryonic
468: closure \citep{mathews05}, as expected for fossil systems.
469:
470: The measured $c$, multiplied by the expected
471: dependence of $1+z$ \citep{bullock01}, is consistent with a $\Lambda$CDM model
472: with $\sigma_8=0.9$ indicative of a relaxed, early forming system in
473: agreement with the theoretical prediction for
474: fossil systems \citep{zentner05,donghia05}
475: and with the observational results of relaxed, low-$z$ clusters
476: \citep{buote06b}.
477:
478: %=====================================================================
479: % CONCLUSION CONCLUSION CONCLUSION CONCLUSION CONCLUSION
480: %=====================================================================
481: \section{Conclusions}
482: \label{conclusion}
483: The discovery of \source\ reported in this letter represents
484: the deepest observation among the intermediate redshift systems discussed in
485: the literature \citep{willis05,jeltema06}, and it already provides an
486: interesting description of its fundamental parameters and dynamical state.
487: Future optical spectroscopy and dedicated X-ray follow-up will allow
488: detailed spectral pro\-per\-ties to be measured.
489:
490:
491: %=====================================================================
492: % ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
493: %=====================================================================
494: \begin{acknowledgements}
495:
496: We thank the referee, H. Ebeling, for useful comments and suggestions.
497: %This work is based on observations obtained with \xmm\, an ESA science
498: %mission with
499: %instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA member states and
500: %the USA (NASA).
501: Partial support for this work was provided by NASA-XMM grant NNG06GC48G.
502: The authors wish to acknowledge the very significant
503: cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always
504: had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate
505: to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
506: \end{acknowledgements}
507:
508:
509: %=====================================================================
510: % REFERENCES REFERENCES REFERENCES REFERENCES REFERENCES
511: %=====================================================================
512:
513: %\newpage
514: \begin{thebibliography}{32}
515: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
516:
517: \bibitem[{{Arnaud}(1996)}]{xspec}
518: {Arnaud}, K.~A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 101: Astronomical Data Analysis
519: Software and Systems V, Vol.~5, 17
520:
521: \bibitem[{{Bertin} \& {Arnouts}(1996)}]{bertin96}
522: {Bertin}, E. \& {Arnouts}, S. 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
523:
524: \bibitem[{{Bryan} \& {Norman}(1998)}]{bryan98}
525: {Bryan}, G.~L. \& {Norman}, M.~L. 1998, \apj, 495, 80
526:
527: \bibitem[{{Bullock} {et~al.}(2001){Bullock}, {Kolatt}, {Sigad}, {Somerville},
528: {Kravtsov}, {Klypin}, {Primack}, \& {Dekel}}]{bullock01}
529: {Bullock}, J.~S., {Kolatt}, T.~S., {Sigad}, Y., {Somerville}, R.~S.,
530: {Kravtsov}, A.~V., {Klypin}, A.~A., {Primack}, J.~R., \& {Dekel}, A. 2001,
531: \mnras, 321, 559
532:
533: \bibitem[{{Buote} {et~al.}(2006){Buote}, {Gastaldello}, {Humphrey},
534: {Zappacosta}, {Bullock}, {Brighenti}, \& {Mathews}}]{buote06b}
535: {Buote}, D.~A., {Gastaldello}, F., {Humphrey}, P.~J., {Zappacosta}, L.,
536: {Bullock}, J., {Brighenti}, F., \& {Mathews}, W. 2006, \apj, submitted,
537: (astro-ph/0610135)
538:
539: \bibitem[{{Buote} {et~al.}(2003){Buote}, {Lewis}, {Brighenti}, \&
540: {Mathews}}]{buot03a}
541: {Buote}, D.~A., {Lewis}, A.~D., {Brighenti}, F., \& {Mathews}, W.~G. 2003,
542: \apj, 594, 741
543:
544: \bibitem[{{Cavaliere} \& {Fusco-Femiano}(1978)}]{beta}
545: {Cavaliere}, A. \& {Fusco-Femiano}, R. 1978, \aap, 70, 677
546:
547: \bibitem[{{Dickey} \& {Lockman}(1990)}]{dick90}
548: {Dickey}, J.~M. \& {Lockman}, F.~J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215
549:
550: \bibitem[{{D'Onghia} {et~al.}(2005){D'Onghia}, {Sommer-Larsen}, {Romeo},
551: {Burkert}, {Pedersen}, {Portinari}, \& {Rasmussen}}]{donghia05}
552: {D'Onghia}, E., {Sommer-Larsen}, J., {Romeo}, A.~D., {Burkert}, A., {Pedersen},
553: K., {Portinari}, L., \& {Rasmussen}, J. 2005, \apjl, 630, L109
554:
555: \bibitem[{{Ettori}(2000)}]{ettori00}
556: {Ettori}, S. 2000, \mnras, 311, 313
557:
558: \bibitem[{{Ferguson} \& {Sandage}(1990)}]{ferguson90}
559: {Ferguson}, H.~C. \& {Sandage}, A. 1990, \aj, 100, 1
560:
561: \bibitem[{{Fukugita} {et~al.}(1995){Fukugita}, {Shimasaku}, \&
562: {Ichikawa}}]{fukugita95}
563: {Fukugita}, M., {Shimasaku}, K., \& {Ichikawa}, T. 1995, \pasp, 107, 945
564:
565: \bibitem[{{Gastaldello} {et~al.}(2006){Gastaldello}, {Buote}, {Humphrey},
566: {Zappacosta}, {Bullock}, {Brighenti}, \& {Mathews}}]{gast06a}
567: {Gastaldello}, F., {Buote}, D.~A., {Humphrey}, P.~J., {Zappacosta}, L.,
568: {Bullock}, J.~S., {Brighenti}, F., \& {Mathews}, W.~G. 2006, ArXiv
569: Astrophysics e-prints, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0610134)
570:
571: \bibitem[{{Grevesse} \& {Sauval}(1998)}]{grsa98}
572: {Grevesse}, N. \& {Sauval}, A.~J. 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
573:
574: \bibitem[{{Jeltema} {et~al.}(2006){Jeltema}, {Mulchaey}, {Lubin}, {Rosati}, \&
575: {B{\"o}hringer}}]{jeltema06}
576: {Jeltema}, T.~E., {Mulchaey}, J.~S., {Lubin}, L.~M., {Rosati}, P., \&
577: {B{\"o}hringer}, H. 2006, \apj, 649, 649
578:
579: \bibitem[{{Jones} {et~al.}(2003){Jones}, {Ponman}, {Horton}, {Babul},
580: {Ebeling}, \& {Burke}}]{jones03}
581: {Jones}, L.~R., {Ponman}, T.~J., {Horton}, A., {Babul}, A., {Ebeling}, H., \&
582: {Burke}, D.~J. 2003, \mnras, 343, 627
583:
584: \bibitem[{{Khosroshahi} {et~al.}(2006){Khosroshahi}, {Ponman}, \&
585: {Jones}}]{khosroshahi06}
586: {Khosroshahi}, H.~G., {Ponman}, T.~J., \& {Jones}, L.~R. 2006, \mnras, 372, L68
587:
588: \bibitem[{{Kinney} {et~al.}(1996){Kinney}, {Calzetti}, {Bohlin}, {McQuade},
589: {Storchi-Bergmann}, \& {Schmitt}}]{kinney96}
590: {Kinney}, A.~L., {Calzetti}, D., {Bohlin}, R.~C., {McQuade}, K.,
591: {Storchi-Bergmann}, T., \& {Schmitt}, H.~R. 1996, \apj, 467, 38
592:
593: \bibitem[{{Landolt}(1992)}]{landolt92}
594: {Landolt}, A.~U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
595:
596: \bibitem[{{Markevitch}(1998)}]{mark98b}
597: {Markevitch}, M. 1998, \apj, 504, 27
598:
599: \bibitem[{{Mathews} {et~al.}(2005){Mathews}, {Faltenbacher}, {Brighenti}, \&
600: {Buote}}]{mathews05}
601: {Mathews}, W.~G., {Faltenbacher}, A., {Brighenti}, F., \& {Buote}, D.~A. 2005,
602: \apjl, 634, L137
603:
604: \bibitem[{{Milosavljevi{\'c}} {et~al.}(2006){Milosavljevi{\'c}}, {Miller},
605: {Furlanetto}, \& {Cooray}}]{milos06}
606: {Milosavljevi{\'c}}, M., {Miller}, C.~J., {Furlanetto}, S.~R., \& {Cooray}, A.
607: 2006, \apjl, 637, L9
608:
609: \bibitem[{{Mulchaey} {et~al.}(2006){Mulchaey}, {Lubin}, {Fassnacht}, {Rosati},
610: \& {Jeltema}}]{mulch06}
611: {Mulchaey}, J.~S., {Lubin}, L.~M., {Fassnacht}, C., {Rosati}, P., \& {Jeltema},
612: T.~E. 2006, \apj, 646, 133
613:
614: \bibitem[{{Nelson} {et~al.}(2002){Nelson}, {Gonzalez}, {Zaritsky}, \&
615: {Dalcanton}}]{nelson02}
616: {Nelson}, A.~E., {Gonzalez}, A.~H., {Zaritsky}, D., \& {Dalcanton}, J.~J. 2002,
617: \apj, 566, 103
618:
619: \bibitem[{{Osmond} \& {Ponman}(2004)}]{osmond04}
620: {Osmond}, J.~P.~F. \& {Ponman}, T.~J. 2004, \mnras, 350, 1511
621:
622: \bibitem[{{Pierre} {et~al.}(2004){Pierre}, {Valtchanov}, {Altieri}, {Andreon},
623: {Bolzonella}, {Bremer}, {Disseau}, {Dos Santos}, {Gandhi}, {Jean}, {Pacaud},
624: {Read}, {Refregier}, {Willis}, {Adami}, {Alloin}, {Birkinshaw}, {Chiappetti},
625: {Cohen}, {Detal}, {Duc}, {Gosset}, {Hjorth}, {Jones}, {LeFevre}, {Lonsdale},
626: {Maccagni}, {Mazure}, {McBreen}, {McCracken}, {Mellier}, {Ponman},
627: {Quintana}, {Rottgering}, {Smette}, {Surdej}, {Starck}, {Vigroux}, \&
628: {White}}]{pierre04}
629: {Pierre}, M., {et~al.} 2004, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics,
630: 9, 11
631:
632: \bibitem[{{Saxton} \& {Siddiqui}(2002)}]{saxton02}
633: {Saxton}, R.~D. \& {Siddiqui}, H. 2002, XMM-SOC-PS-TN-43
634:
635: \bibitem[{{Sheinis} {et~al.}(2002){Sheinis}, {Bolte}, {Epps}, {Kibrick},
636: {Miller}, {Radovan}, {Bigelow}, \& {Sutin}}]{sheinis02}
637: {Sheinis}, A.~I., {Bolte}, M., {Epps}, H.~W., {Kibrick}, R.~I., {Miller},
638: J.~S., {Radovan}, M.~V., {Bigelow}, B.~C., \& {Sutin}, B.~M. 2002, \pasp,
639: 114, 851
640:
641: \bibitem[{{Suto} {et~al.}(1998){Suto}, {Sasaki}, \& {Makino}}]{suto98}
642: {Suto}, Y., {Sasaki}, S., \& {Makino}, N. 1998, \apj, 509, 544
643:
644: \bibitem[{{Voit}(2005)}]{voit05b}
645: {Voit}, G.~M. 2005, Rev. Mod. Phys., 77, 207
646:
647: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(1994){White}, {Giommi}, \& {Angelini}}]{white94}
648: {White}, N.~E., {Giommi}, P., \& {Angelini}, L. 1994, \iaucirc, 6100, 1
649:
650: \bibitem[{{Willis} {et~al.}(2005){Willis}, {Pacaud}, {Valtchanov}, {Pierre},
651: {Ponman}, {Read}, {Andreon}, {Altieri}, {Quintana}, {Dos Santos},
652: {Birkinshaw}, {Bremer}, {Duc}, {Galaz}, {Gosset}, {Jones}, \&
653: {Surdej}}]{willis05}
654: {Willis}, J.~P., {et~al.} 2005, \mnras, 363, 675
655:
656: \bibitem[{{Zentner} {et~al.}(2005){Zentner}, {Berlind}, {Bullock}, {Kravtsov},
657: \& {Wechsler}}]{zentner05}
658: {Zentner}, A.~R., {Berlind}, A.~A., {Bullock}, J.~S., {Kravtsov}, A.~V., \&
659: {Wechsler}, R.~H. 2005, \apj, 624, 505
660:
661: \end{thebibliography}
662:
663: \end{document}
664:
665:
666: