1: %update 2/5/07 by jp

2: %update 3/16/07 by KMF

3: %update 3/8/07 by jp

4: %update 12/20/06 by jp

5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

6: 

7: \begin{document}

8: 

9: \title{Infrared Extinction Toward Nearby Star-Forming Regions}

10: 

11: \author{Flaherty, K.M.\altaffilmark{1, 2}, Pipher, J.L.\altaffilmark{2}, Megeath, S.T.\altaffilmark{3}, Winston, E.M.\altaffilmark{4}, Gutermuth, R.A.\altaffilmark{2, 4}, Muzerolle, J.\altaffilmark{1}, Allen, L.E.\altaffilmark{4}, Fazio, G.G. \altaffilmark{4} }

12: 

13: \email{kflaherty@as.arizona.edu}

14: \altaffiltext{1}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.  This work was completed when the first author was at the University of Rochester.}

15: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627}

16: \altaffiltext{3}{Ritter Observatory, University of Toldeo, Toldeo, OH 43606}

17: \altaffiltext{4}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}

18: 

19: \begin{abstract}

20: We present an independent estimate of the interstellar extinction law

21: for the {\it Spitzer} IRAC bands as well as a first attempt at extending

22: the law to the 24\micron\ MIPS band. The source data for these

23: measurements are observations of five nearby star-forming regions: the

24: Orion A cloud, NGC 2068/71, NGC 2024/23, Serpens and Ophiuchus. Color

25: excess ratios $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$ were measured for stars

26: without infrared excess dust emission from circumstellar disks/envelopes.

27:  For four of these five regions, the extinction laws are

28: similar at all wavelengths and differ systematically from a previous

29: determination of the extinction law, which was dominated by the diffuse

30: ISM, derived for the IRAC bands. This difference could be due to the

31: difference in the dust properties of the dense molecular clouds observed

32: here and those of the diffuse ISM. The extinction law at longer

33: wavelengths toward the Ophiuchus region lies between that to the other

34: four regions studied here and that for the ISM. In addition, we extended

35: our extinction law determination to $24\micron$ for Serpens and NGC

36: $2068/71$ using {\it Spitzer} MIPS data.  We compare these results

37: against several ISO extinction law determinations, although in each case

38: there are assumptions which make absolute comparison uncertain. However,

39: our work confirms a relatively flatter extinction curve from 4 - 8$\mu$m

40: than the previously assumed standard, as noted by all of these recent

41: studies. The extinction law at $24\micron$ is consistent with previous

42: measurements and models, although there are relatively large

43: uncertainties.

44: 

45: \end{abstract}

46: 

47: \keywords{extinction --- infrared  -- young clusters}

48: 

49: \section{Introduction}

50: 

51: With the launch of the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope, identification

52: of embedded young stellar objects (YSOs) from their infrared excess emission at mid-infrared wavelengths ($3-8\micron$ using IRAC, the Infrared Array Camera, and at 24$\mu$m, using MIPS, the Multiband Imaging Photometer) has been  facilitated by {\it Spitzer's} unprecedented sensitivity. These wavelengths are sensitive to the emission from disk and envelope material surrounding YSOs, making it easier to differentiate young stellar objects from foreground or background stars where the emission is primarily photospheric. \citet{all04} and \citet{mea04} develop a classification scheme to differentiate young stellar objects based on their IRAC colors, and \citet{muz04} present a scheme utilizing 24$\mu$m data in combination with IRAC data. \citet{gu05} has recently presented a robust classification scheme for YSOs which utilizes de-reddened mid-IR fluxes of the cluster members in combination with ground-based photometry.  These classification  schemes are briefly compared in the recent review article by \citet{allen07}. \citet{lada06} also employ de-reddened IRAC observations to identify YSOs in IC348, using an alternate classification scheme. Since these schemes involve de-reddening, it is critical to provide an accurate extinction law at IRAC and MIPS wavelengths that is appropriate for young clusters embedded in nascent molecular cloud material. 

53: 

54: Examining the extinction to background stars beyond these embedded young clusters probes the column density of dust in the molecular cloud. The availability of 2MASS has allowed for construction of large scale extincton maps in the near-infrared which trace a substantial range in column densities \citep{lada07,lom06}. With an appropriate extinction law, this technique could be extended to longer wavelengths where the extinction is lower and higher column densities can be probed.

55: 

56: 

57: Throughout much of the IRAC range of interest (0.7 - 5$\mu$m), \citet{dr89} fit data existing at that time to a power-law  $A_\lambda \varpropto \lambda^{-\beta}$, with $\beta$ = 1.75, and extrapolated the power law to meet the  beginning of a silicate contribution at $\sim$7 $\mu$m in his Fig. 1; other early papers have found $\beta$ ranging from 1.61 \citep{rl85} to 1.80 \citep{mw90,whi93}. Dust models \citep{wei01} employing size distributions of various grain components with known optical properties have been constructed to match observed extinction laws.  Measurements of the extinction law from $\sim0.9\micron$ to

58: $\sim2\micron$ have been reported by many investigators using a

59: variety of techniques (from both ground-based and space observations)

60: along a number of lines of sight, and these were thought to be

61: ``universal", i.e. generally in agreement with each other

62: \citep{dr89,car89}, although recently some authors have questioned this

63: universality \citep{gk01,rgk02}. Longward of $2\micron$ the extinction is less certain  (see the range in $\beta$ above), and the most robust

64: estimates are generally obtained with instruments on spaceborne

65: telescopes. Pre-$Spitzer$ studies have relied primarily on

66: measurements of hydrogen recombination or hydrogen rotational and

67: ro-vibrational lines \citep{lut96,lut99,ros00,ber99} to estimate the

68: extinction law for $\lambda>2.5\micron$.  For example, \citet{lut99}

69: used hydrogen recombination line emission toward the galactic center

70: to probe the extinction from $2.5\micron < \lambda < 20\micron$ and

71: found that the extinction law $A_\lambda$/$A_V$ is flatter from

72: $4-8\micron$ than the power laws noted above, and approximately

73: $4\times$ smaller than the value of the standard curve at

74: 7$\mu$m. \citet{lut99} notes that the lack of a deep minimum near

75: 7$\mu$m is in conflict with predictions assuming the standard mixture

76: of silicate and graphite grains \citep{dr89}. 

77: \citet{ber99} and \citet{ros00} observed $H_2$

78: rotational and ro-vibrational lines toward OMC-1 and assumed a power

79: law ($\lambda^{-1.7}$ extending from 2.4 to $6\micron$), and fit two

80: silicate features to the extinction law beyond $8\micron$.  The latter

81: authors also determined extinctions from hydrogen recombination lines,

82: and obtained smaller values of the relative extinction by this method

83: than with $H_2$ lines. In that case $A_{\lambda}$/$A_V$ was also

84: relatively flatter from 3$\mu$m - 7$\mu$m, and from 1.5 - 2 times

85: smaller than the comparison curve (in this case the IR extinction law

86: from \citet{co93} with modifications to the 10$\mu$m silicate feature

87: strength: the Cohen law is very similar otherwise to the one adopted

88: by \citet{dr89}).  A study using ISOGAL, DENIS and 2MASS data of

89: intermediate AGB and RGB stars in the inner galactic plane by \citet{ji06}

90: determined values for $A_7$/$A_{K_s}$ and $A_{15}/A_{K_s}$ that are more

91: comparable to those of \citet{lut99} than to earlier `standard'

92: interstellar extinction curves in the solar neighborhood \citep{dr89}.

93: 

94: Using observations of stars they identified as reddened clump giant stars in the galactic plane

95: obtained as part of the {\it Spitzer} GLIMPSE survey, \citet{ind05}

96: directly measured the extinction law for the {\it Spitzer} IRAC bands

97: at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0$\mu$m. They observed the massive

98: star-forming region RCW 49 at a distance exceeding 2 kpc, as well as two off-field regions very close to the

99: galactic plane, and supplemented the {\it Spitzer} data with 2MASS

100: observations of the same fields.  For the off-field regions, their method determines the diffuse 

101: interstellar medium extinction, assuming that the red clump giants are uniformly distributed along the line of sight. Reddened red clump giant stars were

102: selected from their position in the $J$ vs. $J-K_s$ color-magnitude

103: diagram, and a reddening band was identified which was then used to

104: determine $A_J/A_{K_s}$ assuming a narrow distribution of intrinsic colors and luminosities of the clump giants. $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ was then determined from $[\lambda]-K_s$ vs. $J-K_s$ color-color diagrams for these objects. The extinction curve

105: for all three of these regions was nearly identical and also appeared

106: to have a shallower slope for $\lambda>4\micron$ than the standard

107: law.  R. Indebetouw kindly provided the data for these three regions so that we could process them using the same methods that we used to process our data, hence making possible a direct comparison of the extinction laws toward the young clusters studied here, and that along the lines-of-sight probed by \citet{ind05}.

108: 

109: Here we determine the extinction law from $3-8\micron$ toward five young, nearby ($<$ 1 kpc) cluster regions, including the Orion A cloud, NGC 2068/71, NGC 2024/23, Ophiuchus and Serpens.  We further determine the extinction at $24\micron$ for two of the regions, NGC 2068/71 and Serpens.  In all cases we measure extinctions in relatively broad wavebands as determined by fixed, cold filters.  By examining those stars without disk/envelope infrared excess emission in the cloud direction, we evaluate the selective extinction at mid-infrared wavelengths: the extinction derives primarily from their host molecular clouds, although extinction from the diffuse interstellar medium is also a factor.  We compare our determination against prior determinations in the literature including the ``standard extinction law" such as that compiled by \citet{dr89}. It is important when comparing these determinations to keep in mind that spectroscopic measurements may differ from our broad-band measurements at these wavelengths.

110: 

111: 

112: Our separate extinction law study at the wavelengths of the IRAC bands

113: is motivated by a discrepancy between slopes of the bands of reddened

114: sources in the $H-K_s$ vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color diagrams for our

115: clusters, and slopes found using the GLIMPSE data. Reddened non-excess sources form a band on the $H-K_s$

116: vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color diagrams extending from the

117: intrinsic colors of the stars parallel to the reddening vector whose

118: {\it slope} is the color-excess ratio $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$ $\equiv$ $(A_H- A_{K_s})/(A_{K_s}-A_{\lambda})$. These color excess ratios, derived in  Section~\ref{obs}

119: and given in Table 2 for our data, and for the GLIMPSE data provided by

120: Indebetouw, illustrate at a glance the discrepancy between selective extinction slopes toward

121: our sources and theirs. \citet{hu07} also found a slope discrepancy between the selective extinction law toward isolated dense molecular cores observed in the {\it Spitzer} Cores to Disks (c2d) Legacy program \citep{ev03}, and toward those regions examined by \citet{ind05}.

122: 

123: 

124: For these young clusters, and for the regions examined by \citet{ind05}, we utilize in our analysis those stars without a mid-infrared excess in the IRAC color-color diagrams \citep{all04}, namely class III cluster objects, and field stars. Background dwarfs and red giants, including the red clump giants, are the primary probes of the extinction that originate in the clusters' nascent molecular clouds. Using complementary 2MASS ground-based $H$ and $K_s$ data as well as $Spitzer$ data on these objects, we measure the color excess ratios $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$ from $H-K_s$ vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color diagrams, and from these ultimately derive $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ for an assumed value of $A_H/A_{K_s}$.  The same method allows extension to 24$\mu$m for the Serpens and NGC $2068/71$ clusters, although these results are more uncertain because of the comparative paucity of detected sources. 

125: 

126: In Section~\ref{obs} the observations and data reduction will be discussed, and

127: Section~\ref{measure_ext} will describe source selection and the derivation of the

128: reddening law from these data. Section~\ref{results} will report the

129: results and discuss the differences between the extinction law derived

130: here for our data and for the data used in the study by \citet{ind05}, as well as the extinction law derived using different methods and extinction probes by \citet{ind05}, with further reference to other determinations \citep{lut99,ji06,ros00,hu07}.  We have not determined the total to selective extinction in this study, so shall concentrate on relative extinctions, assuming a value for $A_H/A_{K_s}$ in order to make comparisons with other work.  Because a non-universal extinction law may lead to variations in this assumed value, we consider how this assumption affects our results.

131: 

132: \section{Observations and Analysis}\label{obs}

133: Observations of several young star-forming clusters were obtained with

134: the IRAC camera \citep{faz04} aboard {\it Spitzer} as part of several surveys concentrating on star-formation within $1$ kpc of the Sun, including the ``Young Cluster Survey" (PID 6), the ``Orion Survey" (PID 43) from G. Fazio's guaranteed observation time, as well as the ``Cores to Disks Legacy Program" (PID 174 and 177). The IRAC camera takes

135: simultaneous images in four channels whose isophotal wavelengths are

136: $3.550$, $4.439$, $5.731$ and $7.872\micron$ respectively

137: \citep{faz04}. Some of the regions observed cover several square degrees so

138: that multiple AORs with the IRAC camera were required. NGC

139: $2024$ and NGC $2023$ were imaged as part of the same region, while NGC

140: $2068$ and NGC $2071$ were also observed together. Observations of the

141: Orion A cloud included coverage of OMC 2/3, ONC and L1641. High

142: dynamic range mode \citep{faz04} was used, resulting in a frame with a

143: $0.4$ second exposure time and a frame with a $10.4$ second exposure

144: time at each position. The maps for each of NGC 2024/23, NGC 2068/71 and Orion A were repeated twice. The maps of Serpens and Ophiuchus were repeated four times, with small offsets. The additional dithers provide both additional sensitivity to faint sources and greater ability to remove cosmic rays from the final mosaics. We have not corrected for the position dependent gain variation for point sources\footnote{See \url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/locationcolor/}}, which would result in an additional 5\% uncertainty. 

145: 

146: For the Orion fields individual frames were mosaiced using a custom

147: IDL program and from these mosaics, source selection and point source

148: photometry were completed using Gutermuth's PhotVis v$1.08$

149: \citep{gut04}. The photometry used an aperture of $2.4\arcsec$ and a

150: sky annulus with inner and outer radii of $2.4\arcsec$ and

151: $7.2\arcsec$. Details on the data reduction and source selection in

152: Serpens and Ophiuchus are described in \citet{wi07} and

153: \citet{all07}. \citet{Reach05} discusses the calibration of the IRAC

154: instrument. The calibration of the {\it Spitzer} telescope was refined during the course of this work, and the resulting zero points are listed in Table 1. However, changes in the zero point do not change the results in this paper and are taken into account in our fitting technique. From the 2MASS point source database we obtained

155: corresponding $J, H$ and $K_s$ band magnitudes for each star. For the

156: NGC $2068/71$, NGC $2024/23$ and Serpens regions, we required

157: magnitude uncertainty $\sigma<0.1$ in all seven bands for sources used

158: to calculate the extinction law. For the Orion A cloud and Ophiuchus a

159: detection in J band was not required, thereby increasing the number of

160: highly reddened sources and providing a better determination of the

161: extinction law. For the remaining 6 bands, a magnitude uncertainty of

162: $\sigma < 0.1$ was imposed. If we do not require a J band detection for NGC $2024/23$ , NGC $2068/71$ or Serpens, our derived values for the slope of the extinction vector are within $1\sigma$ of the values derived with the seven-band data.

163: 

164: Requiring sources to have this magnitude uncertainty 

165: reduced the spread of the sources on each color-color diagram, and

166: minimized the uncertainty in the fit (see Section~\ref{measure_ext}). Those sources for which only upper limits to 2MASS magnitudes were available were not included in our analysis.  Most of the sources had much smaller magnitude uncertainties. The median magnitude uncertainties for NGC 2024/23 sources 

167: are $0.03, 0.02, 0.02, 0.005, 0.005, 0.02, 0.05$ for $J, H, K_s$, and

168: channels 1 through 4 of IRAC respectively. Similar median magnitude uncertainties were obtained for the other regions studied here. Loosening the requirement on the maximum uncertainty will include more sources with lower fluxes. It is possible that these sources have higher extinction and could provide a more accurate measure of the reddening law.  However, increasing the uncertainty limit leads to the inclusion of more outliers that skew the slope and are difficult to remove with a simple color cut. A small number of fits did not have any outliers and for these fits including the sources with higher uncertainty does not change our results by more than the measured uncertainty in the color excess ratios.

169: 

170: MIPS 24 $\mu$m images were available for several of the regions

171: studied. Not all regions were suitable - there were insufficient non-excess sources in some regions to reliably derive an extinction law.  We report on NGC 2068/71 and Serpens observations with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for

172: {\it Spitzer} \citep[MIPS,][]{ri04}. We summarize the MIPS observations, with more detailed descriptions of the data reduction and photometric measurements for Serpens and NGC 2068/71 in \citet{wi07} and \citet{muz07} respectively. The measurements were obtained in scan mode with half-array cross-section offsets. All three MIPS bands are observed simultaneously in this mode; the total effective exposure time per point is about 80 seconds at 24 microns. Photometry was determined using a PSF fitting program in IDL.

173: 

174: \section{Background Source Selection and Determination of Extinction Law}\label{measure_ext} 

175: 

176: % We now describe how we selected suitable background extinction probes.

177:  Background dwarfs and giants (including red clump giants and RGB stars) as well as embedded pre-main sequence stars can be used to measure the extinction due to the molecular cloud dust

178: associated with the star-forming region as well as diffuse

179: line-of-sight extinction. As mentioned above, the sources used to measure the extinction were chosen from 

180: those without infrared excesses from disk or envelope emission in the

181: $[3.6]-[4.5]$ vs. $[5.8]-[8.0]$ color-color diagram toward each cluster

182: region. Eliminating infrared excess sources from

183: consideration removes any ambiguities between stars with red colors

184: caused by extinction vs. stars with circumstellar dust or envelope

185: emission, including both pre-main sequence stars and AGB stars. A non-excess source was defined as having colors

186: $[3.6]-[4.5] < 0.6$ and $[5.8]-[8.0] < 0.2$. This region of

187: consideration was chosen so that it did not overlap with the expected

188: position of pre-main sequence stars with disks according to \citet{all04} and included

189: the expected spread in colors due to interstellar dust reddening,

190: which is larger at the shorter wavelengths. This definition of

191: non-excess sources is consistent with the theoretical models of

192: \citet{whi03}, and the observations of \citet{mea04} and

193: \citet{gut04}. An upper limit on the $[3.6]-[4.5]$ color is used to

194: eliminate unresolved outflow sources misidentified as stars. Outflows

195: have emission features in the 4.5 $\mu$m band, leading to

196: $[3.6]-[4.5]$ colors which could be confused with those from reddened

197: non-excess stars. 

198: 

199: We extend our selection criteria to attempt to further remove foreground stars, and stars whose colors place them outside the reddening band. We remove foreground giants by excluding any star brighter than a K2III giant with $M_J=-0.9$ \citep{lop02} at the distance of each cluster. We also exclude stars with $H-K_s<0.2$, which are mostly foreground dwarfs (see discussion below). Stars with $K_s-[3.6]<0$ do not fit into the reddening band and are removed as well as stars that appear to have an excess in the $H-K_s$ vs $K_s-[8.0]$ diagram (e.g. $H-K_s< 1.04(K_s-[8.0])-0.2$ for Serpens). We have not attempted to use only clump red giants, as was done by \citet{ind05}, because of the difficulty in distinguishing these stars from highly reddened dwarfs and pre-main sequence stars without disks. Our reddest stars will be dominated by red giants and embedded pre-main sequence stars because of the large intrinsic luminosity needed to detect these stars at such high extinction although at lower extinction we may have a mix of reddened dwarfs as well as giants and pre-main sequence stars. For Orion A, a number of galaxies contaminated the field and their removal from consideration is discussed in section~\ref{oriona}. 

200: 

201: 

202: \citet{lop02} point out that stars lying to bluer colors than the red clump giant distribution in a $J$ or $K$ vs. $J-K$ color-magnitude diagram for a given line of sight are primarily dwarfs, while stars lying to redder colors are predominantly M giants and AGB stars. The red clump giant distribution is almost vertical around a median $J-K$ = 0.75 $\pm$ 0.2 for off-cloud lines of sight at galactic latitudes with absolute value $\ge$ 6$^{\rm o}$. For fields probing greater extinction from either molecular clouds or along lines of sight closer to the galactic plane, the red clump giant distribution shifts to redder $J-K$, fainter magnitudes and the distribution is broader. All of our clusters have galactic latitudes exceeding 6$^{\rm o}$, with the exception of Serpens, at $b$=5.4$^{\rm o}$. To illustrate the above points for one of our clusters, we show a 

203: $J$ vs. $J-K_s$ diagram for NGC 2068/71 (a region of high extinction) as well as an off-cloud region overplotted (Fig.~\ref{JvJ-K_2068_off}).  The off-cloud field is centered at l=210$^{\rm o}$, b=-8$^{\rm o}$, a region that was chosen because it did not show any significant CO emission indicative of a dense molecular cloud \citep{wi05}. In that diagram, the sources coincident with the cluster utilized in measuring the color-excess ratios are plotted with blue symbols,  and red symbols illustrate cluster sources rejected by the $H-K_s$ cutoff.  Off-cluster sources are plotted with black symbols. In the black double-peaked distribution, dwarfs at various distances along the line of sight occupy the bluer peak, and the red clump sources the redder, with median color $(J-K)_{\rm o}$ = 0.75, as noted above.  The effect of the molecular cloud's reddening can be seen by noting that most red clump extinction probes to NGC 2068/71 form a clump centered at $J-K_s$=1.05 at $J$=14.5. The off-cloud giants have nearly constant $J-K_s$ color, indicating little extinction from the diffuse ISM. For this reason we expect the contribution of the diffuse ISM to our measured extinction law for the Orion fields to be small, although this may not be equally valid for Serpens and Ophiuchus. Many sources redder than the red clump giants are sampled, and in particular, for the cluster region (red and blue points) in Figure~\ref{JvJ-K_2068_off} there is no distinct red clump giant locus. In the cluster region, the highly variable extinction makes it impossible to isolate red clump giants, reddened dwarfs and embedded pre-main sequence stars. We are likely dominated by red clump giants, and perhaps pre-main sequence stars, in the densest parts of the cluster, because they are bright enough to be observed at large reddening. However, we do not attempt to use only red clump giants.

204: 

205: We now move to discussion of reddening law determination. A straight line was fit to

206: background sources in the `reddening' band on an $H-K_s$

207: vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color diagram. After all of the restrictions described above were imposed,  there were 415, 670, 1830 and 1225 background sources for NGC $2023/24$, NGC $2068/71$, Orion A and Serpens respectively. Ophiuchus had 120 background sources and the implications of this small sample size are discussed further in section~\ref{results}. The slope of the line fit to the `reddening' band gives the color-excess ratio

208: $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$ which is then used to determine the

209: relative extinction law $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$, where we assume

210: $A_H/A_{K_s}$ = $1.55\pm0.08$ (the value derived by \citet{ind05}). The effect of a different choice of $A_H/A_{K_s}$ is discussed in section ~\ref{iso}. 

211: 

212: 

213: The line fit to the reddening band data in each of the $H-K_s$

214: vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color diagrams minimized the chi-squared,

215: weighted by the uncertainty in each color.

216: 

217: \begin{equation}\label{chisq}

218: \chi^2(a,b)=\sum^{N}_{i=1}\frac{(y_i-a-bx_i)^2}{\sigma_{yi}^2+b^2\sigma_{xi}^2}

219: \end{equation}

220: 

221: \noindent where $a$ and $b$ are the y-intercept and slope, respectively,

222: of the best fit line and $\sigma_{xi}$ and $\sigma_{yi}$ are the

223: uncertainties in the x and y-values respectively. The algorithm {\it

224: amoeba} in IDL was used to minimize the chi-squared. Determining the

225: best fit-line to the reddening band data using equation~\ref{chisq} not only

226: accounts for the magnitude uncertainties, but also provides a method

227: for estimating the uncertainty in the slope, which leads directly to $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$, the quantity of interest.

228: 

229: \citet{nr92} presented a detailed analysis of the adopted fitting technique as well as the characterization of its uncertainty, which we summarize here for the convenience of the reader. At the best-fit points the $\chi^2$ is a minimum, but if the values of

230: $a$ and $b$ are perturbed away from the best-fit values $\chi^2$

231: increases. A constant value of $\Delta\chi^2=\chi^2-\chi^2_{min}$

232: gives a confidence region within parameter space, which depending on

233: the size of $\Delta\chi^2$, could enclose a $68\%$, $90\%$,

234: etc. confidence interval. The uncertainty in $a$ and $b$

235: is then the projection of this confidence region onto the $a$ and $b$

236: axis. Finding $a,b$ where $\Delta\chi^2$ has a specific

237: value is determined analytically with a Taylor expansion when $\chi^2$

238: is linear in $b$, but must be determined numerically here because

239: $\chi^2$ is non-linear in $b$. This determination is performed by

240: varying $b$, minimizing $a$ at each step, until $\Delta\chi^2$ equals

241: the desired value. There are two values of $b$, one greater and one

242: less than the best-fit value, for which $\Delta\chi^2$ equals the

243: desired value. The distances of these two new values of $b$ from the

244: best fit slope are combined to determine the uncertainty in the

245: slope.

246: 

247: For the majority of our analysis $\Delta\chi^2$ was chosen to be 1,

248: which corresponds to a $68\%$ confidence level

249: \citep{nr92}. Increasing the confidence level to $99.99\%$ requires

250: $\Delta\chi^2=15.1$, which results in an increased uncertainty in the

251: slope. Both a $68\%$ and $99.99\%$

252: confidence interval were determined and are included in

253: Table~\ref{slopes}. The uncertainties are $\sim4$ times bigger for the

254: larger confidence interval than for the smaller confidence interval,

255: but lead to at the most a $6\%$ uncertainty in the fit.

256: 

257: The process that was used to derive the extinction law for the IRAC

258: bands can be applied to the $24\micron$ channel of MIPS. There were only sufficient numbers of non-excess sources with corresponding detections in 2MASS, IRAC and MIPS in the Serpens and NGC 2068/71 regions. The non-excess

259: sources were defined as having $[3.6]-[4.5]<0.6$, 

260: $[5.8]-[8.0]<0.2$ and $[8.0]-[24]<0.5$, with the last color cut used to remove sources that had an excess only at 24\micron. For both NGC $2068/71$ and Serpens fewer than 50 sources were

261: used for the final fit, making sure to exclude outliers and sources

262: with $H-K_s <0.2$, so we are working with quite small numbers of

263: sources. For this reason, we view these results with extreme caution.

264: 

265: 

266: \subsection{Orion A}\label{oriona}

267: While the process for deriving the extinction law from Serpens, Ophiuchus, NGC

268: 2068/71 and NGC 2024/23 data was straightforward, the number and variety of

269: sources toward Orion A required more careful attention. The Orion A

270: cloud covers $4.4$ square degrees, a much larger area than the other four regions observed, increasing the number of sources used when

271: determining the reddening law but also increasing the number of outliers. These outliers are most obvious on the $H-K_s$

272: vs. $K_s-[8.0]$ color-color diagram on which there is a `branch' with

273: $H-K_s\simeq0.25$ which could skew the fit.

274: 

275: This `branch' is not as dominant in any of the other $H-K_s$

276: vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color-diagrams and has nearly constant

277: $H-K_s\simeq0.25$ color as well as $J-K_s\simeq0.9$. The objects in this branch are too blue in $H-K_s$ color to be infrared excess sources but they are too red in $K_s-[8.0]$ color to be main-sequence stars, red giants, or Class III

278: sources. The most likely explanation is that these sources are

279: galaxies. Their blue colors in the near infrared likely derive from

280: main-sequence stars dominating the light at short

281: wavelengths. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) emission from the

282: dust within the galaxies is the likely cause of the red $K_s-[8.0]$

283: color, since strong PAH feature emission falls within the $[8.0]$ band

284: of IRAC. Interpreting these sources as galaxies is consistent

285: with their fairly uniform spread in position throughout the Orion

286: A cloud. They are also not present in the areas with the

287: highest concentration of young stellar objects because these areas

288: have a large density of nebulosity which decreases the sensitivity for

289: detection of background objects, and a high column density of dust obscuring faint background sources. It is also possible that foreground sources contaminated by extended PAH emission are contaminants: however, this does not explain the lack of outliers in the regions of largest PAH emission near the young stars.  Regardless of the physical nature of these outliers, we remove them from our fitting procedure. A first attempt at removing these outliers was performed by changing the selection criteria for non-excess sources. This did not effectively remove the outliers without also removing a signifcant number of sources in the reddening band which are needed to accurately measure the extinction law. Removing these outliers, without removing a substantial number of sources in the reddening band, was completed by first fitting a line in the $H-K_s$ vs. $K_s-[8.0]$ color-color diagram to all of the

290: non-excess sources, including the outliers, and then using the slope of this fit to define a

291: boundary line ($H-K_s=1.11(K_s-[8.0])-0.2$), below which were assumed outliers and above which were

292: the sources used for a more accurate measure of the extinction. The

293: y-intercept of this line was chosen so that a majority of the outliers

294: was removed without removing a significant portion of the reddening

295: band. The initial fit in the $H-K_s$ vs. $K_s-[8.0]$ color-color diagram had a slope of $1.110$ and the final fit had a

296: slope of $1.116$ with $\chi^2/N$ decreasing from $1.99$ for the initial

297: fit to $1.48$ for the final fit. While this is a small correction, the

298: final fit is a more accurate measurement of the extinction law at

299: $8\micron$.

300: 

301: 

302: \section{Results}\label{results}

303: \subsection{The Extinction Law from 3-8$\mu$m}\label{extlaw}

304: 

305: \subsubsection{IRAC-Derived Color Excess Ratios}

306: The slopes of the linear fits to the $H-K_s$ vs. $K_s-[\lambda]$ color-color

307: diagrams for our five clusters are listed in Table~\ref{slopes} and

308: plotted in Figures~\ref{ngc2024_red}, ~\ref{ngc2068_red},

309: ~\ref{serp_red}, ~\ref{oph_red}, and ~\ref{oriona_red}. It is apparent

310: that our derived slopes (color excess ratios) are reasonably

311: consistent from region to region, but in a few instances, are more

312: than 1-$\sigma$ different from each other at the longer

313: wavelengths. In particular, the selective color excess ratio toward

314: the Ophiuchus cloud is lower than toward the other four clouds at

315: 8.0$\micron$. Since Ophiuchus has the smallest number of non-excess sources

316: (120 vs. $>$400 for the other four regions)we assess the possibility that the difference is due to the

317: small number of non-excess sources.  We randomly select 120 non-excess

318: sources from the Orion A field and measure the color-excess ratios in

319: the four IRAC bands for the subsample, repeating this process for 1000

320: subsamples. We can estimate how likely it is to measure the Ophiuchus

321: color-excess ratios based on the distribution of color-excess ratios

322: in each of the four bands for the subsamples. For the 5.8 and 8\micron\ bands the

323: average color-excess ratio for the subsamples is 1.115 and 1.122, with

324: a standard deviation of 0.06 for both bands. The Ophiuchus

325: color-excess ratios are approximately 2$\sigma$ from these mean

326: color-excess ratios at both 5.8 and 8\micron, only a marginally significant

327: deviation. The fraction of subsamples with color-excess ratios at or below the Ophiuchus values are 3\% and 1\% for the 5.8 and 8\micron\ bands respectively. Thus sample size is unlikely to be the cause of the lower selective color excess ratio at 8.0$\micron$ for Ophiuchus.

328: 

329: The color excess ratios for the $l=284^{\circ}, b=0.25^{\circ}$ 

330: off-cloud line-of-sight GLIMPSE data were derived using the same

331: source selection criteria and methods as used for the five

332: star-forming regions discussed here. In contrast to the general

333: agreement among the clusters, the slopes from the GLIMPSE data listed

334: in Table~\ref{slopes} are generally different from the cluster

335: slopes. For completeness, we also quote the color excess ratios from

336: \citet{ind05} for the $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight. Since

337: they directly measured $E_{[\lambda] - K_s}/E_{J-K_s}$, we form

338: $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$ from those ratios in Table~\ref{slopes}.

339: Those values differ at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m from values

340: determined by our analysis.

341: 

342: The question remains whether the larger sample size employed by \citet{ind05} in determining the extinction law is the cause of the discrepancy, as was suspected for Ophiuchus. Their method uses red clump giant stars selected by their $J-K_s$ colors and only requires a detection in the three bands ($J,K_s,[\lambda]$) that are used when measuring the color-excess ratios. This means that more sources are available for determining the color-excess ratios. To avoid this, and any other possible biases due to differing methodologies, we have reanalyzed the \citet{ind05} data using the same methods that were applied to our five clusters as noted above. The $l=284^{\circ}, b=0.25^{\circ}$ off-cloud line-of-sight was studied in detail because it had the largest number of background sources and its extinction law was representative of the other two lines of sight. There were 1590 background sources that met our criteria, comparable to the number of background sources used for four of our five clusters. \citet{ind05} find 3560 red clump giants along this same line of sight when requiring a detection in J and $K_s$ band. This includes stars that have an infrared excess due to circumstellar dust and stars that are not detected by IRAC. The actual number of sources used by \citet{ind05} when measuring the color-excess ratios was smaller ($<3000$) after requiring an IRAC detection and removing stars with an infrared excess. We examine the effect of differing sample sizes by considering the Orion A field and varying the limit on the magnitude uncertainty. When limiting the magnitude uncertainty to 0.1, there were 1825 background sources, while changing the limit from 0.05 to 0.25 results in sample sizes ranging from 1265 to 2360. The color-excess ratios for the extreme cases differ from the case where the magnitude uncertainty is less than 0.1, and from each other, by less than the measured uncertainty in the color-excess ratios.  As a result we do not expect differing sample sizes to provide a source of systematic error when comparing our results to those of \citet{ind05}.

343: 

344: 

345: Figure~\ref{excess_wav} gives the color excess ratio

346: $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$ versus $1/\lambda$ for the five regions

347: observed here as well as for the GLIMPSE $l =284^{\circ}$ off-cloud

348: line-of-sight data analysed by us, showing the systematic separation

349: between the color excess ratios derived for the GLIMPSE line of sight,

350: and for the five young clusters. Our values are consistently 1-$\sigma$, or more, higher than those rederived from \citet{ind05} data with the exception of the $4.5\micron$ band.

351: 

352: The IRAC non-excess stars used when measuring the color-excess ratios can

353: include class III pre-main sequence stars, main sequence stars and red

354: giants (clump giants, and RGB stars), all of which have different

355: intrinsic colors. Our constraint to exclude unreddened stars and bright probes 

356: should minimize contribution from foreground objects. The proximity of Serpens and Ophiuchus reduces the number of foreground contaminants which must be removed. \citet{ind05} restrict themselves to red clump giant stars

357: and find they are well-separated from main sequence stars on a $J$ vs. $J-K_s$

358: color-magnitude diagram for the regions they studied. 

359:  

360: We examine the dependence on extinction probe by calculating residuals which are defined as the

361: difference between $(H-K_s)_{obs}$ for a given $K_s-[\lambda]$ and the

362: predicted $(H-K_s)_{Ind05}$ using the \citet{ind05} determination of

363: $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-\lambda}$. Figure~\ref{residual}, where the residuals are

364: plotted versus $H-K_s$ color, shows the deviation of our extinction law determination for NGC $2068/71$, using non-excess stars, from that of \citet{ind05} using red clump giants.  As noted in $\S$ 3, the parameterization used by \citet{ind05} to pick out red clump giants will not apply to our cluster lines of sight. As can be seen in Figure~\ref{JvJ-K_2068_off} our extinction probes in  NGC $2068/71$ exhibit varying levels of extinction. If using only red clump giant probes produced a systematically different extinction law than we measured, we would expect a locus of sources to follow the \citet{ind05} law at all four bands. No such locus is observed in Figure~\ref{residual}, suggesting that extinction probes are not the main cause of the systematic difference. Sources with $H-K_s > 0.6$, which are mostly red giants, show a substantial deviation from the \citet{ind05} extinction law. Since both methods referred measurements to the $K_s$-band rather than to

365: the $K$-band, a correction for different photometric systems is not necessary. 

366: 

367: 

368: Rederived GLIMPSE color excess

369: ratios are systematically separated from the color excess ratios for

370: the five young clusters observed here. While there are differences in

371: the results derived from the GLIMPSE data using the different methodologies, especially at

372: 3.6 and 4.5\micron, there is still a significant separation between

373: our color excess ratios and those from \citet{ind05}. This suggests

374: that the separation is not primarily caused by the differing methods

375: and/or extinction probes. The systematic separation may instead be due

376: to differences in the extinction from dust in the molecular clouds and

377: the diffuse interstellar medium. This possibility will be further

378: discussed in $\S$~\ref{cloudVism}

379: 

380: 

381: \subsubsection{IRAC-derived Extinction Law}

382: We derive the extinction law $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ for the five clusters studied here as well as for the selected GLIMPSE data, using the color excess ratios determined above. $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ is related to the color excess ratios, and the assumed value of $A_H/A_{K_S}$ by:

383: \begin{equation}

384: \frac{E_{H-K_S}}{E_{K_S-\lambda}}=\frac{\frac{A_H}{A_{K_S}}-1}{1-\frac{A_{\lambda}}{A_{K_S}}}.

385: \end{equation}

386: Since we have used precisely the same methods to establish the extinction law for both data sets, we have removed uncertainties in the comparison that are method-dependent.  In both cases we assume $A_H/A_{Ks}$ = 1.55: values for $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ are listed in Table~\ref{ext}.  In addition, we also give the extinction law for the $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight as derived by \citet{ind05}. 

387: 

388: Different choices for $A_H/A_{K_s}$

389: will affect our derived values of $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$. For NGC

390: $2024/23$, for example, if $A_H/A_{K_s}=1.53$ ($\beta=1.61$) was chosen then

391: $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ would be $0.64,0.55,0.51,0.52$ for the four IRAC

392: bands. If instead $A_H/A_{K_s}$ of 1.73 ($\beta$=1.99) from

393: \citet{ni06} was chosen then $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ would be

394: $0.51,0.38,0.32,0.34$ for the four IRAC bands. The difference in these two determinations of the relative extinction law is larger than the statistical uncertainties in $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ derived from the uncertainties in the selective color excess ratios, which are $\le0.01$. The uncertainties reported in Table~\ref{ext} include the uncertainties in the measured color excess ratios but do not include the uncertainty in $A_H/A_{K_s}$.

395: 

396: 

397: The values of $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ for each of the five regions observed here, subject to the assumption of $A_H/A_{K_s}=1.55$, are plotted in Figure~\ref{ext_wav}. The rederived extinction law for the $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight from \citet{ind05} is also plotted in Figure~\ref{ext_wav}. Extinction law measurements by \citet{lut99}, included as squares in Figure~\ref{ext_wav}, are more consistent with \citet{ind05}, although some of their measurments overlap with our results. The measurement at $7\micron$ from \citet{ji06} is marked with a circle in Figure~\ref{ext_wav}, and the spread in their results for many different sight lines encompass both our results and the results from \citet{ind05}. Our extinction law deviates from a power law, as is also seen in these previous studies.

398: 

399: 

400: \subsubsection{Comparison with ISO-Derived Extinction Laws from $3-8\micron$}\label{iso}

401: 

402: \citet{lut99} compared the observed to expected fluxes for 15 hydrogen

403: recombination lines toward the galactic center from ISO data and from

404: this determined the extinction ratios at the wavelengths of the

405: emission lines. Theoretical estimates of the expected fluxes assumed

406: T$_e$ = 7000K, n$_e$=3000 cm$^{-3}$, case B recombination (which they

407: verify from their observations) and refer directly to the calculations

408: by \citet{st95}. The recombination line results also depend on the

409: assumed helium abundance, [HeII]/[HeIII], and the assumption that line

410: emissions emanate from the same volume. A crucial part of their

411: analysis is the scaling of their relative extinction law: they deduce

412: $A_\lambda$/$A_{2.626}$ (Br$\beta$ at 2.626$\mu$m is the shortest-wave

413: emission line they observe) and use a $\lambda^{-1.75}$ scaling law to

414: refer to $K$-band. We will use a $\lambda^{-1.65}$ law which corresponds to our assumed $A_H/A_{Ks}$ = 1.55, allowing for a more direct comparison with our values of $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ (see discussion below).  Numerical data on $A_{\lambda}$/$A_V$ were provided

415: courtesy of D. Lutz: here we deduce from these data

416: $A_\lambda$/$A_{2.626}$, and using a factor of

417: $A_{K_s}$/$A_{2.626}$=1.38 (assuming the power law index $\beta$=1.65),

418: deduce $A_\lambda$/$A_{K_s}$ for their data. Since we use 2MASS

419: $JHK_s$ data, we have taken the wavelength for $K_s$-band to be

420: 2.16$\mu$m.  Power law indices of 1.61 and 1.8 lead to at most a 2\%

421: error in the extinction ratio.  This is considerably more certain than

422: variations in $A_K/A_V$, which can be as much as 30\% \citep{gl99}, so

423: we choose not to compute $A_\lambda/A_V$ for our data.

424: 

425: \citet{ji06} combined ISO observations at 7 and 15$\micron$ of the

426: inner galactic plane with 2MASS and DENIS near-infrared observation to

427: determine the mid-infrared extinction law and its variation along

428: different sightlines. They assumed a constant value of $(J-K_s)_o$,

429: $(K_s-[7])_o$ and $(K_s-[15])_o$ for early AGB and RGB-tip stars and

430: measured the color excess of these stars along various

431: sightlines. Assuming $A_J/A_K$ from \citet{rl85} they find

432: $A_7/A_K=0.47\pm0.04$ and $A_{15}/A_K=0.40\pm0.07$ (marked as circles

433: in figure~\ref{ext_wav}). Although \citet{rl85} did not measure the

434: extinction law with the 2MASS photometric system, \citet{ind05} found

435: $A_J/A_{K_s}$ in the 2MASS photometric system to be similar to the value of

436: $A_J/A_K$ measured by \citet{rl85}. The results from \citet{ji06} do

437: not change significantly when using $A_J/A_{K_s}$ from \citet{ind05}

438: as opposed to $A_J/A_K$ from \citet{rl85}. At 7$\micron$ they find the

439: extinction law measurements have a Gaussian distribution whose one

440: sigma size encompasses the measurements presented here, as well as

441: those of \citet{ind05} and \citet{lut99}. There is more uncertainty at

442: $15\micron$ but there also appears to be evidence for a Gaussian

443: distribution of extinction values, $A_{15}/A_K$.

444: 

445: 

446: We chose $A_H/A_{K_s}$ from \citet{ind05} to provide a direct comparison of all the mid-infrared selective extinction law measurements discussed here. The extinction law measurements by \citet{ji06} use a similar normalization to our assumed $A_H/A_{Ks}$, and the measurements of \citet{lut99} were normalized using a power law form that is consistent with $A_H/A_{K_s}=1.55$. Different assumptions of the near-infrared extinction law will affect our derived $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ as discussed earlier, but we choose a single consistent normalization to better compare the various determinations of the mid-infrared extinction law.

447: 

448: 

449: 

450: 

451: 

452: \subsubsection{Molecular Cloud vs. Diffuse Interstellar Extinction.}\label{cloudVism}

453: A plausible explanation for the separation between our extinction law and

454: the extinction law of \citet{ind05} is a variation in the extinction

455: law between that through the diffuse ISM and through molecular clouds. Variation in dust optical properties

456: between molecular cloud dust and that in the ISM has been invoked by \citet{hu07}, who, from observations of cloud cores obtained as part of the c2d {\it Spitzer} Legacy program, have also found 

457: extinction law slopes (color excess ratios) which deviate from those of \citet{ind05}. 

458: 

459: 

460: The cold ISM includes diffuse interstellar clouds ($A_V <$ 0.1), poorly shielded regions of molecular clouds ($A_V <$ 3), and dense molecular cloud cores ($A_V >$ 3). \citet{wh01} and references therein, have explored grain growth in dense clouds, and have reported differing extinction laws for the diffuse ISM and dense clouds.  For reference, $A_V$=3 is shown as a vertical dashed line in  Figure~\ref{residual}: most of the deviation of our results from the \citet{ind05} extinction law occurs at higher extinctions. Changes in the extinction law originating in these regions are likely due to grain growth, either by coagulation of small grains or the growth of icy mantles, both of which will affect the continuum level of extinction. Small grains are thought to coagulate to form larger grains (e.g. $\rho$ Oph, \citet{wh01}): grain emissivity is dependent on the optical constituent properties, and for the

461: same constituents is proportional to a power(powers) of {\it a}/${\lambda}$ where {\it a} is the grain size. Grain growth will not only remove small grains as potential absorbers, but also as emitters. The lack of emission from small grains has been observed along lines of sight with high column densities \citep{ste03,bur03, cam05} suggesting grain growth leading to porous grains with enhanced emissivity within these clouds. \citet{pend06} have found a decrease in the depth of the 9.7 $\mu$m silicate feature with increasing $A_V$, indicating silicate grain growth.  $A_V = $ 3 is the approximate extinction threshold for the detection of ice mantles, and in the Taurus Dark Cloud, icy mantle growth is implicated \citep{wh01}. Dust in molecular cloud cores is protected both from the UV interstellar radiation field and from cosmic ray processing; those dust grains may therefore have larger mantles consisting of water and organic ices \citep{gibb04}. Absorption features between 3 and 8\micron\ due to ices are often seen along lines of sight intersecting dense molecular clouds \citep{kn05,gibb04} while they are not seen in the diffuse ISM \citep{wh97}. On the other hand, grain processing and fragmentation because of radiative shock propagation, and turbulence, may also be involved in grain evolution in both molecular clouds and in the diffuse ISM. 

462: 

463: Our extinction law for the young clusters studied here derives mainly from dust associated with their molecular clouds, while that of \citet{ind05} derives primarily from diffuse interstellar dust, especially for the $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight. There is a greater contribution from diffuse interstellar dust for the closest clusters in our sample, Ophiuchus and Serpens, partially because they are in the inner galaxy, and partially because the extinction probes (not excluded by the $JHK$ brightness cutoff) lie well behind the cluster, so that their light passes through more of the ISM before reaching the cluster. The extinction curve toward Ophiuchus has been termed anomalous: measurements of the UV/optical extinction curve and linear polarization \citep{gre92,kim96} toward Ophiuchus indicate a depletion of small grains and the presence of large grains within the molecular cloud.  Studies of other dark clouds have produced similarly anomalous extinction as compared with the ISM: we are unaware of any comprehensive study comparing optical/UV extinction in the dark clouds studied here. \citet{tx99} observe H$_2$O and CO ices in the Taurus and Ophiuchus dark clouds, and concur with previous studies that different physical conditions obtain in those two clouds.  Although column densities of the H$_2$O ices and the visual extinction are correlated in each case, the regression line is different.  There are several Ophiuchus sources which follow the Taurus regression line rather than that for Ophiuchus, suggesting physical properties of the grains can also vary within the cloud.  \citet{sch05} and \citet{dup03} measure the emissivity spectral index $\beta$ ($\kappa_\nu \propto \nu^{\beta}$) in the far-infrared and find variations between Orion, Ophiuchus and Serpens. This indicates that the grain properties differ between these three clouds, but the anticorrelation between spectral index and temperature within a cloud suggests that there can be significant variations in grain properties along different lines of sight through a single cloud. Consequently, we cannot determine here the extent to which the molecular cloud mid-IR extinction toward Ophiuchus is anomalous compared with other clouds in our sample.

464: 

465: 

466: In contrast to our clusters, all within 500 pc of the Sun,  the lines of sight for the ISO measurement may include a larger contribution from a mixture of extinction from the diffuse ISM and molecular clouds. The \citet{lut99} extinction law to the galactic center ionized gas is dominated by dust in the diffuse ISM along the line of sight, although some of the extinction is due to molecular cloud material \citep{lut96,wh97}. Broad ice absorption features at 3 and 6\micron\ are seen toward Sgr A* and are attributed to foreground molecular cloud material \citep{chi00}.  The \citet{ji06} extinction law is for a mix of diffuse ISM and dense molecular cloud dust.  Given the uncertainties in the derived laws of \citet{ji06} and \citet{lut99}, we cannot distinguish whether any agreement, or lack of agreement with either our law or that of \citet{ind05} depends on whether the material causing extinction is part of the diffuse ISM or a dense cloud.

467:  

468: The differing dust properties between diffuse ISM and dense molecular clouds could lead to differences in the extinction law.  We directly measure $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$, which relates

469: $A_{[\lambda]}/A_{K_s}$ and the assumed value of $A_H/A_{K_s}$. A variation in the near-infrared extinction law, the mid-infrared extinction law, or both, could lead to the observed systematic separation in the selective color excess ratios between our observations through molecular clouds  and \citet{ind05}'s observations through the diffuse ISM. If a

470: larger value of $A_H/A_{K_s}$ was more appropriate for the extinction

471: law toward molecular clouds, then $A_{[\lambda]}/A_{K_s}$ would be

472: smaller and the {\it mid-infrared} portion of the extinction law

473: deduced by \citet{ind05} and us could be made to agree. Values of

474: $A_H/A_{K_s}$ between 1.6 and 1.65, depending on the region, would

475: bring our mid-infrared extinction law into agreement with the average extinction law reported by

476: \citet{ind05}, assuming $A_H/A_{K_s}=1.55$ still applied to the

477: \citet{ind05} extinction law. It may also be the case that the

478: near-infrared extinction law does not appreciably vary between the

479: diffuse ISM and molecular clouds and there is instead a variation in

480: the mid-infrared extinction law. We now examine the near- and mid-infrared data separately in order to attempt to break this degeneracy.

481: 

482: The possibility of variations in $A_H/A_{K_s}$ is suggested by recent observations. Although \citet{car89} and \citet{mw90} found the near-infrared

483: extinction law to be universal, more recent studies have produced

484: mixed results. One of the difficulties in evaluating the variation in

485: the near-infrared extinction law along different lines of sight is

486: that different photometric systems (e.g. $K$ vs. $K_s$) can have a

487: substantial effect on the measured extinction law

488: \citep{klb98}. \citet{klb98} and \citet{gk01} observed the nearby

489: star-forming regions $\rho$ Oph and Cha I, respectively, and

490: determined the near-infrared reddening law using the same technique,

491: but with different photometric systems, and find a substantial

492: difference in the reddening law between these two lines of

493: sight. \citet{na06} reobserved $\rho$ Oph and Cha I with one

494: photometric system and used the same technique, the same off-cloud

495: regions, and the same limiting magnitudes as the previous studies by

496: \citet{klb98} and \citet{gk01} but found no variation in the

497: near-infrared reddening law between these two molecular

498: clouds. \citet{ni06} measured the extinction law toward the galactic

499: center using the same photometric system as \citet{na06} and their

500: results are consistent with the reddening law being universal between

501: the Galactic Center and the $\rho$ Oph and Cha I star-forming

502: regions. Evidence for a variation in the near-infrared reddening law

503: comes from \citet{rgk02} who observed the Coalsack Globule 2 using the

504: same photometric system as \citet{gk01}, and used the same technique

505: to determine the reddening law, but found a significant difference

506: between the reddening laws along these two lines of sight.

507: 

508: To isolate the influence of the near-infrared extinction law on our measured color-excess ratios we have measured $E_{H-K_{s}}/E_{K_s-J}$ in a manner similar to the previous color-excess ratios. Since we did not require a J band detection for the Orion A and Ophiuchus regions, we excluded these regions. NGC 2024/23, NGC 2068/71 and Serpens have color excess ratios of $-0.333\pm0.004, -0.335\pm0.003$ and $-0.328\pm0.004$. The {\it l}=$284^{\circ}$ off-cloud region has a color excess ratio of $-0.326\pm0.004$. No significant difference exists in the near infrared color excess ratios among these lines of sight within uncertainties, indicating that there is no significant variation in the near-infrared extinction law through these three molecular clouds and through the interstellar medium.

509: 

510: We examine the mid-infrared portion of the extinction law by forming color-excess ratios that include only IRAC bands from the already measured color excess ratios. From the definition of the color excess ratio

511: \begin{equation}

512: R_{\lambda}=\frac{E_{H-K_s}}{E_{K_s-[\lambda]}}=\frac{A_H-A_{K_s}}{A_{K_s}-A_{\lambda}}

513: \end{equation}

514: \noindent we form the following quantity:

515: \begin{equation}

516: \frac{\frac{1}{R_{\lambda2}}-\frac{1}{R_{\lambda1}}}{\frac{1}{R_{\lambda4}}-\frac{1}{R_{\lambda3}}}=\frac{A_{\lambda1}-A_{\lambda2}}{A_{\lambda3}-A_{\lambda4}}.

517: \end{equation}

518: By choosing $\lambda1=3.6\micron, \lambda2=\lambda3=4.5\micron$ and $\lambda4=5.8\micron$ we have a measure of the IRAC-only color-excess ratio. By combining color-excess ratios rather than using the extinction law measurements, $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$, we reduce the uncertainty in the IRAC-only color-excess ratio. The results are listed in Table~\ref{irac_ratio} for all five young clusters as well as for the $l$=$284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight. While the uncertainties are large, there is clear evidence for a separation between the extinction law measured toward the molecular clouds and the extinction law for only the diffuse ISM. The tabulated values of this ratio demonstrate that the variations between our color-excess ratios and those of \citet{ind05} cannot be explained solely by a change in the value of $A_H/A_{K_S}$, and that the form of the interstellar extinction law must differ between the diffuse ISM, Ophiuchus, and the remaining four molecular clouds. It is also apparent that the Ophiuchus cloud reddening law differs from the reddening law for the other four young clusters. 

519: 

520: \subsection{The Extinction Law beyond $8\micron$}\label{24micron}

521: Extending our analysis out to 24\micron\ we measure $E_{H-K}/E_{K-[24]}=0.98\pm0.04$ and

522: $1.14\pm0.06$, $A_{24}/A_{K_s}=0.44\pm0.02$ and $0.52\pm0.03$, assuming $A_H/A_{K_s}=1.55$, for Serpens and NGC 2068/71 respectively. The large

523: uncertainty for both regions' color excess ratios reflects the small number of sources used in the

524: fitting procedure. Figure ~\ref{24_red} shows the fit to the reddening

525: bands at 24$\micron$, similar to Figures~\ref{ngc2024_red} -

526: ~\ref{oriona_red}. Figure ~\ref{ext_wav} illustrates that our

527: 24$\micron$ determinations are in reasonable accord with those of

528: \citet{lut99} shown as squares in Figure~\ref{ext_wav}, given the

529: large uncertainties, as well as with the measurement at 15$\micron$ by

530: \citet{ji06}, $A_{15}/A_K=0.15\pm0.07$, shown as a circle in

531: Figure~\ref{ext_wav}. \citet{hu07} also measured the extinction law at

532: $24\micron$ and found it to be consistent with our results. 

533: 

534: 

535: \citet{ros00} measured the extinction law from $2-30\micron$ toward

536: OMC-1 using the relative intensities of $H_2$ rotation and

537: ro-vibration lines. They fit a functional form assuming a power law

538: for $\lambda<6.5\micron$ and included the silicate features at

539: $9.7\micron$ and $18\micron$, as well as a water ice feature at

540: $3.1\micron$. The strength of the $9.7\micron$ silicate feature was

541: determined from a fit to their observations, while the relative

542: strength of the $18\micron$ and $9.7\micron$ silicate feature was

543: taken to be $A_{18}/A_{9.7}=0.44$, an average of previous results from

544: \citet{dr84}, \citet{pp85} and \citet{vk88}. The shape of the 9.7\micron\ feature was chosen to match the Trapezium emissivity profile, which is more appropriate for extinction due to dense molecular clouds rather than the narrower $\mu$ Cephei profile \citep{bow98}. While the assumption of a

545: power law from $3-8\micron$ is clearly not valid, the extinction law

546: from $10-30\micron$, as measured here and by \citet{lut99} and

547: \citet{ji06}, is very well fit by a law dominated by silicate emission with the  adopted strengths of the two silicate features given by \citet{ros00}, as can be

548: seen in Figure~\ref{ext_wav}. The $9.7\micron$ silicate feature has been found to vary along different lines of sight \citep{bow98}, particularly on the long-wavelength side of the feature, although there is insufficient data here to draw any conclusions about the universality of the extinction law from $8-30\micron$.

549: 

550: \section{Conclusion}

551: We measured the extinction law from $3 - 8\micron$ toward five nearby

552: star-forming regions and found it to be relatively internally

553: consistent among different cluster-forming molecular clouds although there is evidence that the Ophiuchus extinction law deviates from the other four regions at 5.8 and 8\micron. The

554: extinction laws we present here differ systematically from the

555: extinction at IRAC wavelengths derived by \citet{ind05}, as seen in

556: both the color excess ratios and the relative

557: extinction ratios. To exclude any possibility that this difference could be due to the differing

558: methodologies used to derive the extinction law, we have also analysed data provided by R. Indebetouw using our methods, and continue to find systematic variation.  The result could reflect a

559: physical difference in the extinction law between the diffuse ISM and

560: molecular clouds, or the differing extinction probes utilized in the two studies. Our study of the probes leads us to believe that the major cause of the discrepancy is variation in the diffuse ISM vs. molecular cloud extinction laws. The observed difference in the extinction law towards Ophiuchus could be caused by diffuse ISM behind the molecular cloud that the extinction probes must pass through or differing dust properties between the Ophiuchus cloud and the other four clouds studied.

561: 

562: The extinction law derived by \citet{lut99} agrees more closely with the re-derived \citet{ind05} extinction law at wavelengths $\leq 3\mu$m. At 3$\mu$m $\leq \lambda \leq 8\mu$m, the opposite is true. At $7\micron$ the relative extinction measured by \citet{ji06} agrees with the cluster results. The extension of our extinction law to

563: $24\micron$ was also determined from analysis of {\it Spitzer} images

564: of Serpens and NGC 2068/71, but further observations at this

565: wavelength are required to provide statistically significant

566: conclusions. However, our results at $24\micron$, along with the results of

567: \citet{lut99} and \citet{ji06}, match well the functional form of

568: \citet{ros00} which includes extinction dominated by silicate features at 9.7

569: and 18$\micron$. Future measurements of the extinction law for

570: $10-30\micron$ will help to better constrain this fit, as well as to

571: examine any variation among different lines of sight.

572: 

573: \begin{thebibliography}{}

574: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{all04} Allen, L.E., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 363

575: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2007a)]{allen07} Allen, L.E., et al. 2007a in Protostars and Planets V, ed B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 361

576: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2007b)]{all07} Allen, L.E., et al. 2007b in prep

577: \bibitem[Bertoldi et al.(1999)]{ber99} Bertoldi, F., Timmermann, R., Rosenthal, D., Dropatz, S. \& Wright, C.M. 1999, \aap, 346, 267

578: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{bb88} Bessel, M.S. \& Brett, J.M. 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134

579: \bibitem[Bowey et al.(1998)]{bow98} Bowey, J.E., Adamson, A.T. \& Whittet, D.C.B. 1998, \mnras, 298, 131

580: \bibitem[Cambresy et al.(2005)]{cam05} Cambresy, L., Jarrett, T.H., \& Beichman, C.A. 2005, \aap, 435, 131

581: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{car89} Cardelli, J.A., Clayton, G.C. \& Mathis, J.S. 1989, \apj 345, 245

582: \bibitem[Chiar et al.(2000)]{chi00} Chiar, J.E., Tielens, A.G.G.M., Whitter, D.C.B., Shuttle, W.A., Boogert, A.C.A., Lutz, D., van Dishoeck, E.F. \& Bernsteain, M.P. 2000, \apjs, 154, 363

583: \bibitem[Cohen(1993)]{co93} Cohen, M. 1993, \aj 105, 1860

584: \bibitem[del Burgo et al.(2003)]{bur03} del Burgo, C., Laurejis, R.J., \'Abrah\'am, P. \& Kiss, Cs. 2003, \mnras, 346, 403

585: \bibitem[Draine(1989)]{dr89} Draine, B.T. 1989 Proc. 22nd Eslab Symposium on Infrared Spectroscopy, ESA SP-290, 93.

586: %\bibitem[Draine(2003)]{dra03} Draine, B.T. 2003 \araa, 41, 241

587: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{dr84} Draine, B.T. \& Lee H. 1984, \apj, 285, 89

588: \bibitem[Dupac et al.(2003)]{dup03} Dupac, X., et al., 2003, \aap, 404, L11

589: \bibitem[Evans et al.(2003)]{ev03} Evans, N.J., II, et al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 965

590: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04} Fazio, G.G., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10 

591: \bibitem[Gibb et al.(2004)]{gibb04} Gibb, E.L., Whittet, D.C.B., Boogert, A.C.A. \& Tielens, A.G.G.M. 2004, \apjs, 151, 35

592: \bibitem[Giles(1977)]{gil77} Giles, K. 1977, \mnras, 180, 57P

593: \bibitem[Glass(1999)]{gl99} Glass, I. 1999, Handbook of Infrared Astronomy (Cambridge University Press)

594: \bibitem[Gomez \& Kenyon(2001)]{gk01} Gomez, M. \& Kenyon, S. 2001, \aj, 121, 974

595: %\bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{gor05} Gordon, K., et al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 503

596: \bibitem[Green et al.(1992)]{gre92} Green, J.C., Snow, T.P., Cook, T.A, Cash, W.C. \& Poplawski, O. 1992, \apj, 395, 289

597: \bibitem[Gutermuth(2005)]{gu05} Gutermuth, R.A. 2005, PhD thesis.

598: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{gut04} Gutermuth, R.A., et al. 2004 \apj, 154, 374

599: \bibitem[Huard et al.(2007)]{hu07} Huard, T., et al. 2007 in prep

600: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2005)]{ind05} Indebetouw, R., et al. 2005, \apj, 619,931

601: \bibitem[Jiang et al.(2006)]{ji06} Jiang, B.W., Gao, J., Omont, A., Schuller, F. \& Simon, G. 2006, \aap, 446, 551

602: %\bibitem[Kaas(1999)]{ka99} Kaas 1999, \aj 118, 558

603: \bibitem[Kenyon, Lada \& Barsony(1998)]{klb98} Kenyon, S., Lada, E. \& Barsony, M., 1998, \aj, 115, 252

604: \bibitem[Kim \& Martin(1996)]{kim96} Kim, S.-H. \& Martin, P.G. 1996, \apj, 462, 296

605: \bibitem[Knez et al.(2005)]{kn05} Knez, C., et al. 2005, \apj, 635, 145

606: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{lada06} Lada, C.J., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1574

607: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2007)]{lada07} Lada, C.J., Alves, J.F. \& Lombardi, M. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 3

608: %\bibitem[Landsman(1993)]{lan93} Landsman, W.B. 1993 in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, A.S.P. Conference Series, Vol. 52, ed. R.J. Hanisch, R.J.V. Brissenden, and Jeannette Barnes, p.246

609: \bibitem[Lombardi et al.(2006)]{lom06} Lombardi, M., Alves, J.F. \& Lada, C.J. 2006, \aap, 454, 781

610: \bibitem[L\'opez-Corredoira et al.(2002)]{lop02} L\'opez-Corredoira, M. Cabrera-Lavers, A., Garz\'on, F. \& Hammersley, P.L. 2002, \aap, 394, 883

611: \bibitem[Lutz et al.(1996)]{lut96} Lutz, D., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L269

612: \bibitem[Lutz(1999)]{lut99} Lutz, D. 1999, in The Universe as Seen by {\it ISO}, ed. P. Cox \& M.F.Kessler (ESA SP-427;Noordwijk:ESA), 623

613: \bibitem[Martin \& Whittet(1990)]{mw90} Martin, P.G. \& Whittet, D.C.B. 1990, \apj, 357, 113

614: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{mea04}  Megeath, S. T., Gutermuth, R. A., 

615: Allen, L.E., Pipher, J. L., Myers, P. C. \& Fazio, G. G., 2004, \apjs, 154, 367

616: %\bibitem[Moore et al.(2005)]{mo05} Moore, T., Lumsden, S., Ridge, N., Puxley, P., 2005, \mnras, 359, 589

617: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2004)]{muz04} Muzerolle, J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 379

618: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2007)]{muz07} Muzerolle, J., et al. 2007 in prep

619: \bibitem[Nishiyama et al.(2006)]{ni06} Nishiyama, S., et al. 2006, \apj, 638, 839

620: \bibitem[Naoi et al.(2006)]{na06} Naoi, T., et al. 2006, \apj, 640, 373

621: \bibitem[Pegourie \& Papoular(1985)]{pp85} Pegourie, B. \& Papoular, R.  1985, \aap, 142, 451

622: \bibitem[Pendleton et al.(2006)]{pend06} Pendleton, Y., et al. 2006, \baas, 208.4915

623: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{nr92} Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. \& Flannery, B.P. 1992 ``Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing'', (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press)

624: \bibitem[Racca et al.(2002)]{rgk02} Racca, G., Gomez, M. \& Kenyon, S., 2002 \aj, 124, 2178

625: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{Reach05} Reach, W.T., et al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 978.

626: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{ri04} Rieke, G.H., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 25

627: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rl85} Rieke, G.H. \& Lebofsky, M.J. 1985, \apj,288, 618

628: \bibitem[Rosenthal, Bertoldi \& Drapatz(2000)]{ros00} Rosenthal, D., Bertoldi, F. \& Drapatz, S. 2000, \aap, 356, 705

629: \bibitem[Schnee et al.(2005)]{sch05} Schnee, S.L., Ridge, N.A., Goodman, A.A. \& Li, J.G. 2005, \apj, 634, 442

630: \bibitem[Stepnik et al.(2003)]{ste03} Stepnik, B., et al. 2003, \aap, 398, 551

631: \bibitem[Storey \& Hummer(1995)]{st95} Storey, J. \& Hummer, D. 1995, \mnras 272, 21

632: \bibitem[Teixeira \& Emerson(1999)]{tx99} Teixeira, T. C. \& Emerson, J.P. 1999, \aap 351, 292

633: \bibitem[Volk \& Kwok(1988)]{vk88} Volk, K. \& Kwok, S. 1988,\apj, 331, 435

634: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001)]{wei01} Weingartner, J.C. \& Draine, B.T. 2001, \apj, 548, 296

635: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2005)]{wi05} Wilson, B.A., Dame, T.M., Masheder, M.R.W. \& Thaddeus, P. 2005, \aap, 430, 523

636: \bibitem[Winston et al.(2007)]{wi07} Winston, E., et al. 2007 in prep

637: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1993)]{whi93} Whittet, D.C.B., Martin, P.G., Fitzpatrix, E.L., Massa, D. 1993, \apj, 408, 573

638: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1997)]{wh97} Whittet, D.C.B., et al. 1997, \apj, 490, 729

639: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(2001)]{wh01} Whittet, D.C.B., Gerakines, P.A., Hough, J.H. \& Shenoy, S.S. 2001, \apj, 547, 872

640: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2003)]{whi03} Whitney, B., Wood, K., Bjorkman, J.E. \& Cohen, M. 2003, \apj, 598, 1079

641: 

642: 

643: 

644: \end{thebibliography}

645: 

646: \clearpage

647: 

648: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}

649: \tablewidth{0pt}

650: \tablecaption{Observing Information}

651: \tablehead{\colhead{Region}&\colhead{GTO Program IDs}&\colhead{Pipeline Version}&\colhead{Magnitude Zero Points\tablenotemark{a}}&\colhead{Frame Time\tablenotemark{b}}}

652: \startdata

653: NGC $2024/23$&43&S9.5.0&21.93,21.26,19.08,19.44&12\\

654: NGC $2068/71$&43&S9.5.0&21.93,21.26,19.08,19.44&12\\

655: Orion A&43&S9.5.0&21.93,21.26,19.08,19.44&12\\

656: Serpens&6,174,177&S11.4&21.99,21.26,19.07,19.44&12\\

657: Ophiuchus&6,174,177&S11.4&21.99,21.26,19.07,19.44&12\\

658: \enddata

659: \tablenotetext{b}{HDR mode includes the time spent on both the long and short exposure. The effective exposure time after mosaicing the multiple maps of each region (two for NGC 2024/23, NGC2068/71 and Orion A, four for Serpens and Ophiuchus) will be longer than this frame time.}

660: \tablenotemark{a}{For an exposure time of 10.4 seconds and object, inner and outer sky apertures of 2,2 and 6 pixels respectively.}

661: \end{deluxetable}

662: 

663: 

664: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}

665: \tablewidth{0pt}

666: \tablecaption{Selective Color Excess Ratios\label{slopes}}

667: \tablehead{\colhead{Region}&\colhead{$E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[3.6]}$}&\colhead{$E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[4.5]}$}&\colhead{$E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[5.8]}$}&\colhead{$E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[8.0]}$}}

668: \startdata

669: NGC $2024/23$&$1.49\pm0.02(0.08)$&$1.17\pm0.02(0.06)$&$1.08\pm0.01(0.06)$&$1.11\pm0.02(0.07)$\\

670: NGC $2068/71$&$1.49\pm0.02(0.07)$&$1.13\pm0.01(0.05)$&$1.03\pm0.01(0.05)$&$1.07\pm0.01(0.05)$\\

671: Serpens&$1.49\pm0.02(0.08)$&$1.17\pm0.02(0.06)$&$1.08\pm0.01(0.05)$&$1.07\pm0.01(0.06)$\\

672: Orion A&$1.51\pm0.01(0.04)$&$1.197\pm0.008(0.03)$&$1.109\pm0.007(0.03)$&$1.116\pm0.008(0.03)$\\

673: Ophiuchus&$1.46\pm0.02(0.07)$&$1.17\pm0.01(0.05)$&$1.01\pm0.01(0.05)$&$1.01\pm0.01(0.05)$\\

674: Ind$05$data&$1.27\pm0.02(0.09)$&$1.11\pm0.02(0.08)$&$0.92\pm0.02(0.06)$&$0.90\pm0.01(0.06)$\\

675: \tableline

676: Ind$05$paper&$1.17\pm0.07$&$1.0\pm0.03$&$0.92\pm0.03$&$0.92\pm0.04$\\

677: \enddata

678: \tablecomments{Values ``Ind05 paper" are derived from color excess rations from \citet{ind05} with their uncertainties propogated, and ``Ind05 data" are derived from the data R. Indebetouw kindly provided.  Both are for the $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight data.  Ind05 data were analyzed in the same way that our data were analyzed, in order to enable direct comparison with our results. Our uncertainties are for a $68\%$ confidence level with uncertainties for a $99.99\%$ confidence interval in parenthesis.}

679: \end{deluxetable}

680: 

681: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

682: \tablewidth{0pt}

683: \tablecaption{Relative Extinction\label{ext}}

684: \tablehead{\colhead{Region}&\colhead{$A_{[3.6]}/A_{K_s}$}&\colhead{$A_{[4.5]}/A_{K_s}$}&\colhead{$A_{[5.8]}/A_{K_s}$}&\colhead{$A_{[8.0]}/A_{K_s}$}}

685: 

686: \startdata NGC $2024/23$&$0.632\pm0.005$&$0.53\pm0.01$&$0.49\pm0.01$&$0.50\pm0.01$\\

687: NGC $2068/71$&$0.632\pm0.005$&$0.51\pm0.01$&$0.47\pm0.01$&$0.48\pm0.01$\\

688: Serpens&$0.630\pm0.005$&$0.53\pm0.01$&$0.49\pm0.01$&$0.49\pm0.01$\\

689: Orion A&$0.636\pm0.003$&$0.540\pm0.003$&$0.504\pm0.003$&$0.506\pm0.003$\\

690: Ophiuchus&$0.623\pm0.005$&$0.53\pm0.01$&$0.45\pm0.01$&$0.45\pm0.01$\\

691: Ind$05$ data&$0.57\pm0.01$&$0.50\pm0.01$&$0.40\pm0.01$&$0.39\pm0.01$\\

692: \tableline

693: Ind$05$ paper&$0.57\pm0.05$&$0.43\pm0.07$&$0.41\pm0.07$&$0.37\pm0.07$\\

694: \enddata

695: \tablecomments{Quoted values taken from \citet{ind05} ("Ind05 paper") are for the $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud line of sight. The values of $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ were derived from the measured selective color excess ratios $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-\lambda}$ for the five young clusters and the rederived color excess ratios for the $l=284^{\circ}$ line of sight assuming $A_H/A_{K_s}=1.55\pm0.08$ \citep{ind05}. Uncertainties on $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ derived here do not include the uncertainty in $A_H/A_{K_s}$. Uncertainties on $A_{\lambda}/A_{K_s}$ taken from \citet{ind05} (labeled Ind05 paper) do include the uncertainty in $A_H/A_{K_s}$.}

696: \end{deluxetable}

697: 

698: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}

699: \tablewidth{0pt}

700: \tablecaption{IRAC-only Color Excess Ratio}

701: \tablehead{\colhead{Region}&\colhead{$E_{[3.6]-[4.5]}/E_{[4.5]-[5.8]}$}}

702: 

703: \startdata

704: NGC $2024/23$&$2.58\pm0.66$\\

705: NGC $2068/71$&$2.49\pm0.56$\\

706: Serpens&$2.58\pm0.66$\\

707: Orion A&$2.61\pm0.33$\\

708: Ophiuchus&$1.25\pm0.13$\\

709: \tableline

710: Ind$05$ data&$0.61\pm0.14$\\

711: \enddata

712: \tablecomments{Color Excess ratio derived using $E_{H-K_s}/E_{K_s-[\lambda]}$. See text for more details on this calculation.\label{irac_ratio}}

713: \end{deluxetable}

714: 

715: \clearpage

716: 

717: \begin{figure}

718: \epsscale{1.}

719: \plotone{f1.eps}

720: \caption{$J$ vs. $J-K_s$ diagram for the NGC 2068/71 cluster (plotted in  blue), and an equivalent area off-field region (black).  Red symbols represent cluster stars excluded by the $H-K_s$ cutoff. For the off-cloud (black symbols) line of sight, dwarfs occupy the peak at $J-K_s$=0.2, while red clump sources are distributed around $J-K_s$=0.75.  On the other hand, toward the clusters (blue) red clump extinction probes are found peaked around $J-K_s$=1.05 at $J$ = 14.5 toward the cluster. The solid line is a reddening vector for $A_V=5$ extending from $J=14.5$,$J-K_s=0.75$ \citep{rl85}.\label{JvJ-K_2068_off}}

721: \end{figure}

722: 

723: \begin{figure}

724: \epsscale{1.}

725: \plotone{f2.eps}

726: \caption{2MASS and IRAC color-color diagrams for NGC $2024/23$ non-excess sources. Line is the best fit to the

727: data. Sources with $H-K_s<0.2$ or $K_s-[3.6]<0$ were not included in the

728: fit. Slopes are listed in Table~\ref{slopes}\label{ngc2024_red}.}

729: \end{figure}

730: 

731: \begin{figure}

732: \epsscale{1.}

733: \plotone{f3.eps}

734: \caption{2MASS and IRAC color-color diagrams for NGC $2068/71$ non-excess sources. Line is the best fit to the

735: data. Sources with $H-K_s<0.2$ or $K_s-[3.6]<0$ were not included in the

736: fit. Slopes are listed in Table~\ref{slopes}\label{ngc2068_red}.}

737: \end{figure}

738: 

739: \begin{figure}

740: \epsscale{1.}

741: \plotone{f4.eps}

742: \caption{2MASS and IRAC color-color diagrams for Serpens non-excess

743: sources.  Line is the best fit to the data. Sources with $H-K_s<0.2$ or

744: $K_s-[3.6]<0$ were not included in the fit. Slopes are listed in

745: Table~\ref{slopes}\label{serp_red}.}

746: \end{figure}

747: 

748: \begin{figure}

749: \epsscale{1.}

750: \plotone{f5.eps}

751: \caption{2MASS and IRAC color-color diagrams for Ophiuchus non-excess sources. Line is the best fit to the data. Slopes are listed in Table~\ref{slopes}.\label{oph_red}}

752: \end{figure}

753: 

754: \begin{figure}

755: \epsscale{1.}

756: \plotone{f6.eps}

757: \caption{2MASS and IRAC color-color diagrams for Orion A non-excess sources.  Line is the best fit to

758: the data. Sources with $H-K_s<0.2$ or $K_s-[3.6]<0$ were not included in

759: the fit. Slopes are listed in Table~\ref{slopes}. The dashed line is the boundary used to eliminate the branch near $H-K_s=0.25$.\label{oriona_red}.}

760: \end{figure}

761: 

762: \begin{figure}

763: \epsscale{1.}

764: \plotone{f7.eps}

765: \caption{Selective Color Excess Ratio versus inverse wavelength for

766: NGC $2024/23$, NGC $2068/71$, Serpens, Orion A, Ophiuchus and from the 

767: $l=284^{\circ}$ off-cloud region examined by \citet{ind05}, derived using the same method as for the five star-forming regions.\label{excess_wav}}

768: \end{figure}

769: 

770: \begin{figure}

771: \epsscale{1.}

772: \plotone{f8.eps}

773: \caption{Residuals $(H-K_s)_{obs}-(H-K_s)_{Ind05}$ for the non-excess

774: sources in NGC 2068/71 vs. $H-K_s$. See text for explanation of

775: residuals.  The solid horizonal line is flat and is the expected slope

776: if the reddening law \citep{ind05} were a perfect fit to the data. At

777: larger extinction (larger $H-K_s$) there is a substantial separation from

778: the solid line, suggesting the appropriate reddening law has a

779: different slope than that of \citet{ind05}. Vertical dashed line shows the color for a K2 giant \citep{bb88}, taken to be the typical spectral type for a red clump star, extinguished by $A_V$=3 using the extinction law of \citet{rl85}. $A_V$=3 is the boundary for ice mantle growth within a molecular cloud \citep{wh01}.\label{residual}}

780: \end{figure}

781: 

782: \begin{figure}

783: \epsscale{.7}

784: \plotone{f9a.eps}

785: \plotone{f9b.eps}

786: \caption{Extinction in IRAC bands versus wavelength for each of NGC

787: $2023/24$, NGC $2068/71$, Serpens, Ophiuchus, Orion A and the extinction law rederived here for the $l=284^{\circ}$ line of sight from \citet{ind05}. The squares are the extinction law toward the galactic

788: center as measured by \citet{lut99} using hydrogen recombination

789: lines. On the top is the extinction law from $1-10\micron$, while on

790: the bottom is the extinction law from $7-30\micron$. The extinction law

791: measured at $7\micron$ and $15\micron$ by \citet{ji06} are labeled

792: with circles in the two plots. On the bottom, the extinction law between 7

793: and $24\micron$ is shown for NGC 2068/71, Serpens and as measured by

794: \citet{lut99} with diamonds, triangles and squares respectively. The

795: line in the second plot is the extinction curve derived by

796: \citet{ros00} using $H_2$ line ratios observed towards OMC-1. Horizontal solid lines represent the bandpasses for the IRAC and MIPS filters in the top and bottom plots repectively.\label{ext_wav}}

797: \end{figure}

798: 

799: 

800: \begin{figure}

801: \epsscale{.7}

802: \plotone{f10a.eps}

803: \plotone{f10b.eps}

804: \caption{2MASS and MIPS 24$\micron$ color-color diagrams for NGC $2068/71$ (top) and Serpens (bottom). Line is the best fit to the data.\label{24_red}}

805: \end{figure}

806: 

807: 

808: 

809: \end{document}

810: