1: \begin{abstract}

2: Two methods are compared that are used in path integral simulations.

3: Both methods aim to achieve faster convergence to the quantum limit

4: than the so-called primitive algorithm (PA).

5: One method, originally proposed by Takahashi and Imada, is based on a

6: higher-order approximation (HOA) of the quantum mechanical density operator.

7: The other method is based upon an effective propagator (EPr).

8: This propagator is constructed such that it  produces

9: correctly one and two-particle imaginary time correlation functions

10: in the limit of small densities even for finite Trotter numbers $P$.

11: We discuss the conceptual differences between both methods and

12: compare the convergence rate of both approaches.

13: While the HOA method converges faster than

14: the EPr approach, EPr gives surprisingly good estimates of thermal 

15: quantities already for $P = 1$. Despite a significant improvement with respect

16: to PA, neither HOA nor EPr

17: overcomes the need to increase $P$ linearly with inverse temperature.

18: We also derive the proper estimator for radial distribution functions

19: for HOA based path integral simulations.

20: \end{abstract}

21: