1: \begin{abstract}

2: To control for multiscale effects

3: in networks, one can, using the iterative proportional fitting (Sinkhorn-Knopp) procedure,  alternately scale the  row sums to equal 1 

4: and then the column sums, until sufficient convergence--under broad conditions--to a bistochastic (doubly-stochastic) table is ultimately  obtained. The dominant entries in the bistochasticized table can then be employed for network reduction 

5: purposes, using strong component hierarchical clustering. We illustrate various facets of this well-established, widely-applied two-stage algorithm with the $3, 107 \times 3, 107$ (asymmetric) 1995-2000 intercounty migration flow table for the United States. 

6: We compare the results obtained with ones using the disparity filter, for "extracting the "multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks", recently

7: put forth by Serrano, Bogu{\~n}{\'a} and Vespignani (SBV) ({\it Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.} 106 [2009], 6483), upon which we have commented ({\it Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.} 106 [2009], E66). In this specific migration-flow analysis, the performance of the bistochastic filter appears superior in two meaningful respects: (1) it requires far fewer links to complete a strongly-connected network backbone; and (2) it "belittles" small flows and nodes less--a principal desideratum of SBV--in the sense that the correlations of the nonzero raw flows are considerably weaker with the corresponding bistochastized links than with the significance levels yielded by the disparity filter. 

8: \end{abstract}

9: