1: \begin{abstract}

2: Wright \cite{Wr92} showed that, if a 1-ended simply connected locally compact

3: ANR $Y$ with pro-monomorphic fundamental group at infinity (i.e. representable

4: by an inverse sequence of monomorphisms) admits a proper $\mathbb{Z} $-action,

5: then that fundamental group at infinity can be represented by an inverse

6: sequence of finitely generated free groups. Geoghegan and Guilbault

7: \cite{GeGu12} strengthened that result, proving that $Y$ also satisfies the

8: crucial \emph{semistability} condition (i.e. representable by an inverse

9: sequence of epimorphisms).

10: 

11: Here we get a stronger theorem with weaker hypotheses. We drop the

12: \textquotedblleft pro-monomorphic hypothesis\textquotedblright\ and simply

13: assume that the $\mathbb{Z}$-action is generated by what we call a

14: \textquotedblleft coaxial\textquotedblright\ homeomorphism. In the

15: pro-monomorphic case every proper $\mathbb{Z}$-action is generated by a

16: coaxial homeomorphism, but coaxials occur in far greater generality (often

17: embedded in a cocompact action). When the generator is coaxial, we obtain the

18: sharp conclusion: $Y$ is proper 2-equivalent to the product of a locally

19: finite tree with $\mathbb{R}$. Even in the pro-monomorphic case this is new:

20: it says that, from the viewpoint of fundamental group at infinity,

21: the\ \textquotedblleft end\textquotedblright\ of $Y$ looks like the suspension

22: of a totally disconnected compact set.

23: 

24: \end{abstract}