1: \begin{abstract}

2:   Given a probability space $(X, {\cal B}, m)$, measure preserving

3:   transformations $g_1, \dots , g_k$ of $X$, and a colour set $C$, a colouring

4:   rule is a way to colour the space with $C$ such that the colours allowed for

5:   a point $x$ are determined by that point's location and the colours of the

6:   finitely $g_1 (x), \dots , g_k(x)$ with $g_i(x) \not= x$ for all $i$ and

7:   almost all $x$.  We represent a colouring rule as a correspondence $F$

8:   defined on $X\times C^k$ with values in $C$. A function $f: X\rightarrow C$

9:   satisfies the rule at $x$ if $f(x) \in F( x, f(g_1 x), \dots , f(g_k x))$.  A

10:   colouring rule is paradoxical if it can be satisfied in some way almost

11:   everywhere with respect to $m$, but not in {\bf any} way that is measurable

12:   with respect to a finitely additive measure that extends the probability

13:   measure $m$ and for which the finitely many transformations

14:   $g_1, \dots , g_k$ remain measure preserving. We show that a colouring rule

15:   can be paradoxical when the $g_1, \dots, g_k$ are members of a group $G$, the

16:   probability space $X$ and the colour set $C$ are compact sets, $C$ is convex

17:   and finite dimensional, and the colouring rule says if $c: X\rightarrow C$ is

18:   the colouring function then the colour $c(x)$ must lie ($m$ a.e.)  in

19:   $F(x, c(g_1(x) ), \dots , c(g_k(x)))$ for a non-empty upper-semi-continuous

20:   convex-valued correspondence $F$ defined on $X\times C^k$.  We show that any

21:   colouring that approximates the correspondence by $\epsilon$ for small enough

22:   positive $\epsilon$ cannot be measurable in the same finitely additive way.

23:   Furthermore any function satisfying the colouring rule illustrates a paradox

24:   through finitely many measure preserving shifts defining injective maps from

25:   the whole space to subsets of measure summing up to less than one.

26:   \end{abstract}

27: