1: \begin{abstract}

2:   The weak lensing power spectrum is a powerful tool to probe

3:   cosmological parameters. Additionally, lensing peak counts contain

4:   cosmological information beyond the power spectrum.  Both of these

5:   statistics can be affected by the preferential selection of source

6:   galaxies in patches of the sky with high magnification, as well as

7:   by the dilution in the source galaxy surface density in such

8:   regions.  If not accounted for, these biases introduce systematic

9:   errors for cosmological measurements.  Here we quantify these systematic

10:   errors, using convergence maps from a suite of ray-tracing N-body

11:   simulations.  At the cut-off magnitude $m$ of on-going and planned major weak lensing surveys,

12:   the logarithmic slope of the cumulative number counts 

13:   $s\equiv d\log n(>m)/d\log m$ is in the range $0.1\lsim s \lsim0.5$.

14:   At $s \approx 0.2$, expected in the $I$ band for LSST, the inferred values of

15:   $\Omega_m$, $w$ and $\sigma_8$ are biased by many $\sigma$ (where

16:   $\sigma$ denotes the marginalized error) and therefore the

17:   biases will need to be carefully modeled.  We also find that the

18:   parameters are biased differently in the ($\Omega_m$,

19:   $w$, $\sigma_8$) parameter space when the power spectrum and when

20:   the peak counts are used. In particular, 

21:   $w$ derived from the power spectrum is less affected than $w$ derived from

22:   peak counts, while the opposite is

23:   true for the best-constrained combination of

24:   $\sigma_8\Omega_m^\gamma$ (with $\gamma=0.62$ from the power

25:   spectrum and $\gamma = 0.48$ from peak counts).  

26:   This suggests that the combination of the power spectrum and peak counts 

27:   can help mitigate the impact of magnification and size biases.

28: \end{abstract}

29: