1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: We present a deliberation model where a group of individuals with heterogeneous preferences

4: iteratively forms expert committees whose members are tasked with the updating of

5: an exogenously given status quo change proposal.

6: % We present a collective decision-making model where

7: % a status quo change is exogenously proposed to a group of individuals who then

8: % iteratively update it through an elected, dynamic, deliberative committee of their experts.

9: Every individual holds some initial voting power

10: that is represented by a finite amount of indivisible units with some underlying value.

11: Iterations happen in three stages.

12: In the first stage,

13: everyone decides which units to keep for themselves and where to distribute the rest.

14: With every ownership mutation,

15: a unit's underlying value diminishes by some exogenously given amount.

16: In the second stage, the deliberative committee

17: is formed by the individuals with the most accumulated voting power.

18: These experts can author corrections to the proposal which are proportional to their

19: accumulated power.

20: In the third stage,

21: if an individual outside of the committee disagrees with a correction,

22: she can vote against it with their remaining voting power.

23: A correction is discarded if more than half of the total voting power

24: outside of the committee is against it.

25: If either the committee or the proposal remain unchanged for two consecutive

26: iterations, the process stops. We show that this will happen in finite time.

27: 

28: \end{abstract}

29: