bbfd9e70b32766b8.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We consider both $\ell _{0}$-penalized and $\ell _{0}$-constrained quantile
3: regression estimators. For the $\ell _{0}$-penalized estimator, we derive an
4: exponential inequality on the tail probability of excess quantile prediction
5: risk and apply it to obtain non-asymptotic upper bounds on the mean-square
6: parameter and regression function estimation errors. We also derive
7: analogous results for the $\ell _{0}$-constrained estimator. The resulting
8: rates of convergence are nearly minimax-optimal 
9: and the same as those for $\ell
10: _{1} $-penalized estimators. Further, we characterize expected Hamming loss
11: for the $\ell _{0}$-penalized estimator. We implement the proposed procedure
12: via mixed integer linear programming and also a more scalable first-order
13: approximation algorithm. We illustrate the finite-sample performance of our
14: approach in Monte Carlo experiments and its usefulness in a real data
15: application concerning conformal prediction of infant birth weights (with $%
16: n\approx 10^{3}$ and up to $p>10^{3}$). In sum, our $\ell _{0}$-based method
17: produces a much sparser estimator than the $\ell _{1}$-penalized approach
18: without compromising precision. \newline
19: 
20: %\vspace*{-1ex}
21: 
22: \noindent \textbf{Keywords}: quantile regression, sparse estimation, mixed
23: integer optimization, finite sample property, conformal prediction, Hamming
24: distance \newline
25: 
26: \noindent \textbf{JEL Codes}: C21, C52, C61
27: \end{abstract}
28: