1: \begin{abstract}

2:   We address the choice of penalty parameter in the Smoothness-Penalized Deconvolution (SPeD) method of estimating a probability density under additive measurement error.

3:   Cross-validation gives an unbiased estimate of the risk (for the present sample size \(n\)) with a given penalty parameter, and this function can be minimized as a function of the penalty parameter.

4:   Least-squares cross-validation, which has been proposed for the similar Deconvoluting Kernel Density Estimator (DKDE), performs quite poorly for SPeD.

5:   We instead estimate the risk function for a \emph{smaller} sample size \(n_1 < n\) with a given penalty parameter, using this to choose the penalty parameter for sample size \(n_1\), and then use the asymptotics of the optimal penalty parameter to choose for sample size \(n\).

6:   In a simulation study, we find that this has dramatically better performance than cross-validation, is an improvement over a SURE-type method previously proposed for this estimator, and compares favorably to the classic DKDE with its recommended plug-in method.

7:   We prove that the maximum error in estimating the risk function is of smaller order than its optimal rate of convergence.

8: \end{abstract}