1: \begin{abstract}

2: %   Since the last ten years, many optimization methods have appears for most of the inverse problems. However, they are

3: %   generally different in the way they manage linear operators. For example, the Poisson deconvolution problem can be

4: %   solved using sparsity regularization using two different schemes: primal and primal-dual. Using this context, we

5: %   propose to compare these two schemes in term of convergence speed and times complexity and then propose some elements

6: %   of answer on which scheme is the best for the current problem.

7: In this paper, we propose two algorithms for solving linear inverse problems when the observations are corrupted by Poisson noise. A proper data fidelity term (log-likelihood) is introduced to reflect the Poisson statistics of the noise. On the other hand, as a prior, the images to restore are assumed to be positive and sparsely represented in a dictionary of waveforms. Piecing together the data fidelity and the prior terms, the solution to the inverse problem is cast as the minimization of a non-smooth convex functional. We establish the well-posedness of the optimization problem, characterize the corresponding minimizers, and solve it by means of primal and primal-dual proximal splitting algorithms originating from the field of non-smooth convex optimization theory. Experimental results on deconvolution and comparison to prior methods are also reported.

8: \end{abstract}

9: