1: \begin{abstract}

2: A \emph{d-cone} is the shape one obtains when pushing an elastic sheet at its

3: center into a hollow cylinder. In a simple model, one can treat the 

4: elastic sheet in the deformed configuration as a developable surface with a singularity at the ``tip'' of the

5: cone.

6: % (see E.~Cerda, L.~Mahadevan, ``Confined developable elastic surfaces: cylinders, cones and the elastica'',

7: % Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering

8: % Science, 461(2055):671-700, 2005)

9: In this approximation, the renormalized elastic energy is 

10: given by the bending energy density integrated over some annulus in the

11: reference configuration. The thus defined  variational problem depends on the

12: indentation $h$ of the

13: sheet into the cylinder.

14: This model has been

15: investigated before in the physics

16: literature; the main motivation

17: for the present paper is to give a rigorous version of some of the results

18: achieved there via formal arguments.

19: We derive the Gamma-limit of the energy functional as $h$ is sent to

20: 0. Further, we analyze the minimizers of the limiting functional, and list a

21: number of necessary conditions that they have to fulfill. 

22: % In , this situation has been investigated under the

23: % assumption that the surface under consideration is developable away from the

24: % point where the sheet is being pushed into the cylinder. Cerda and Mahadevan

25: % were able to quite explicitly describe  the shape of minimizers of the elastic

26: % energy for small deflections through the solution of a linear ODE. In their derivation, they made two assumptions: Firstly, they assumed that nonlinear terms could be discarded, and secondly, they made an assumption on the regularity of the minimizers. In this note, we rigorously justify these assumptions. We make precise the sense in which the limit of ``small deflections'' has to be understood, formulating it in terms of $\Gamma$-convergence. Then we show regularity of minimizers of the limit functional.

27: \end{abstract}

28: