c3b0ed56039185f8.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:   There are several common ways to encode a tree as a matrix, such as
3:   the adjacency matrix, the Laplacian matrix (that is, the
4:   infinitesimal generator of the natural random walk), and the matrix
5:   of pairwise distances between leaves. Such representations involve a
6:   specific labeling of the vertices or at least the leaves, and so it
7:   is natural to attempt to identify trees by some feature of the
8:   associated matrices that is invariant under relabeling. An obvious
9:   candidate is the spectrum of eigenvalues (or, equivalently, the
10:   characteristic polynomial). We show for any of these choices of
11:   matrix that the fraction of binary trees with a unique spectrum goes
12:   to zero as the number of leaves goes to infinity. We investigate the
13:   rate of convergence of the above fraction to zero using numerical
14:   methods. For the adjacency and Laplacian matrices, we show that that
15:   the {\em a priori} more informative immanantal polynomials have no
16:   greater power to distinguish between trees.
17: \end{abstract}
18: