1: \begin{abstract}

2: In \cite{Frobenius1896}, it was shown that many important properties of a

3: finite group could be examined using formulas involving the \textit{%

4: character ratios }of group elements, i.e., the trace of the element acting

5: in a given irreducible representation, divided by the dimension of the

6: representation.

7: 

8: In \cite{Gurevich-Howe15} and \cite{Gurevich-Howe17}, the current authors

9: introduced the notion of \textit{rank} of an irreducible representation of a

10: finite classical group.

11: 

12: One of the motivations for studying rank was to clarify the nature of

13: character ratios for certain elements in these groups.

14: 

15: In fact in the above cited papers, two notions of rank were given. The first

16: is the Fourier theoretic based notion of $U$\textbf{-rank} of a

17: representation, which comes up when one looks at its restrictions to certain

18: abelian unipotent subgroups. The second is the more algebraic based notion

19: of \textbf{tensor rank} which comes up naturally when one attempts to equip

20: the representation ring of the group with a grading that reflects the

21: central role played by the few "smallest" possible representations of the

22: group.

23: 

24: In \cite{Gurevich-Howe17} we conjectured that the two notions of rank

25: mentioned just above agree on a suitable collection called "low rank"

26: representations.

27: 

28: In this note we review the development of the theory of rank for the case of

29: the general linear group $GL_{n}$ over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_{q}$, and

30: give a proof of the "agreement conjecture" that holds true for sufficiently

31: large $q$. Our proof is Fourier theoretic in nature, and uses a certain

32: curious positivity property of the Fourier transform of the set of matrices

33: of low enough fixed rank in the vector space of $m\times n$ matrices over $%

34: \mathbb{F}_{q}$.

35: 

36: In order to make the story we are trying to tell clear, we choose in this

37: note to follow a particular example that shows how one might apply the

38: theory of rank to certain counting problems.

39: \end{abstract}

40: