1: \begin{abstract}

2: % purpose

3: \Gls{wss} is a crucial hemodynamic quantity extensively studied in cardiovascular research, yet its numerical computation is not straightforward. 

4: This work aims to compare \gls{wss} results obtained from two different finite element discretizations, quantify the differences between continuous and discontinuous stresses, and introduce a novel method for \gls{wss} evaluation through the formulation of a boundary-flux problem.

5: 

6: % methods

7: Two benchmark problems are considered -- a 2D Stokes flow on a unit square and a 3D Poiseuille flow through a cylindrical pipe.

8: These are followed by investigations of steady-state Navier--Stokes flow in two patient-specific aneurysms.

9: The study focuses on P1/P1 stabilized and Taylor–Hood P2/P1 mixed finite elements for velocity and pressure.

10: \gls{wss} is computed using either the proposed boundary-flux method or as a projection of tangential traction onto \gls{cg1}, \gls{dg1}, or \gls{dg0} space.

11: 

12: % results and discussion

13: For the P1/P1 stabilized element, the boundary-flux and \gls{cg1} projection methods yielded equivalent results. 

14: With the P2/P1 element, the boundary-flux evaluation demonstrated faster convergence in the Poiseuille flow example but showed increased sensitivity to pressure field inaccuracies in patient-specific geometries compared to the projection method. 

15: In patient-specific cases, the P2/P1 element exhibited superior robustness to mesh size when evaluating average \gls{wss} and \gls{lsa}, outperforming the P1/P1 stabilized element.

16: 

17: Projecting discontinuous finite element results into continuous spaces can introduce artifacts, such as the Gibbs phenomenon. 

18: Consequently, it becomes crucial to carefully select the finite element space for boundary stress calculations -- not only in applications involving \gls{wss} computations for aneurysms.

19: \end{abstract}

20: