1: \begin{abstract}

2: We discuss the origin of CP violation in settings with a discrete (flavor)

3: symmetry \DiscreteGroup. We show that physical CP transformations always have to

4: be class--inverting automorphisms of \DiscreteGroup. This allows us to

5: categorize finite groups into three types:  (i) Groups that do not exhibit such

6: an automorphism and, therefore, in generic settings, explicitly violate CP. In

7: settings based on such groups, CP violation can have pure group--theoretic

8: origin and can be related to the complexity of some Clebsch--Gordan

9: coefficients. (ii) Groups for which one can find a CP basis in which all the

10: Clebsch--Gordan coefficients are real. For such groups, imposing CP invariance

11: restricts the phases of coupling coefficients. (iii) Groups that do not admit

12: real Clebsch--Gordan coefficients but possess a class--inverting  automorphism

13: that can be used to define a proper (generalized) CP transformation. For such

14: groups, imposing CP invariance can lead to an additional symmetry that forbids

15: certain couplings. We make use of the so--called twisted Frobenius--Schur

16: indicator to distinguish between the three types of discrete groups. With

17: $\Delta(27)$, \Tprime, and $\Sigma(72)$ we present one explicit example for each

18: type of group, thereby illustrating the CP properties of models based on them.

19: We also show that certain operations that have been dubbed generalized CP

20: transformations in the recent literature do not lead to physical CP

21: conservation. 

22: \end{abstract}

23: