1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: Cluster expansion (CE) is effective in modeling the stability of metallic 

4: alloys, but sometimes cluster expansions fail. Failures are often attributed to

5: atomic relaxation in the DFT-calculated data, but there is no metric for

6: quantifying the degree of relaxation. Additionally, numerical errors can also

7: be responsible for slow CE convergence. We studied over one hundred different

8: Hamiltonians and identified a heuristic, based on a normalized mean-squared

9: displacement of atomic positions in a crystal, to determine if the effects of

10: relaxation in CE data are too severe to build a reliable CE model. Using this

11: heuristic, CE practitioners can determine a priori whether or not an alloy

12: system can be reliably expanded in the cluster basis. We also examined the

13: error distributions of the fitting data. We find no clear relationship between

14: the type of error distribution and CE prediction ability, but there are clear

15: correlations between CE formalism reliability, model complexity, and the number 

16: of significant terms in the model. Our results show that the \emph{size} of the

17: errors is much more important than their distribution.

18: 

19: %\begin{description}

20: %\item[Usage]

21: %Secondary publications and information retrieval purposes.

22: %\item[PACS numbers]

23: %May be entered using the \verb+\pacs{#1}+ command.

24: %\item[Structure]

25: %You may use the \texttt{description} environment to structure your %abstract;

26: %use the optional argument of the \verb+\item+ command to give the %category of each item. 

27: %\end{description}

28: \end{abstract}

29: