1: \begin{abstract}

2: Out of the participants in a randomized experiment with anticipated heterogeneous treatment effects, is it possible to identify which ones have a positive treatment effect, even though each has only taken either treatment or control but not both?

3: % Treatment effects are often heterogeneous within the investigated population, and there have been active studies on identifying subgroups of subjects who respond positively to the treatment. 

4: While subgroup analysis has received attention, claims about individual participants are more challenging.

5: % However, most existing methods cannot guarantee an upper bound on the proportion of falsely identified subjects: it is possible that 90\% of the identified subjects do not respond positively to the treatment. 

6: We frame the problem in terms of multiple hypothesis testing: we think of each individual as a null hypothesis (the potential outcomes are equal, for example) and aim to identify individuals for whom the null is false (the treatment potential outcome stochastically dominates the control, for example). 

7: % while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). 

8: We develop a novel algorithm that identifies such a subset, with nonasymptotic control of the false discovery rate (FDR). Our algorithm allows for interaction --- a human data scientist (or a computer program acting on the human's behalf) may adaptively guide the algorithm in a data-dependent manner to gain high identification power. We also propose several extensions: (a) relaxing the null to nonpositive effects, (b) moving from unpaired to paired samples, and (c) subgroup identification. We demonstrate via numerical experiments and theoretical analysis that the proposed method has valid FDR control in finite samples and reasonably high identification power.

9: \end{abstract}

10: