1: \begin{abstract}

2: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3: 

4: In a recent work, van Setten and coworkers have presented a carefully converged

5: $G_0W_0$ study of 100 closed shell molecules [J. Chem. Theory Comput. \textbf{11}, 5665 (2015)]. For two different

6: codes they found excellent agreement to within few 10 meV

7: if identical Gaussian basis sets were used.

8: We inspect the same set of molecules using the projector augmented wave method

9: and the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP).

10: For the ionization potential, the basis set extrapolated plane wave results agree very well with the

11: Gaussian basis sets, often reaching better than 50 meV agreement.

12: In order to achieve this agreement, we correct for finite basis set

13: errors as well as errors introduced by periodically repeated images.

14: For electron affinities below the vacuum level differences between

15:  Gaussian basis sets and VASP are slightly larger. We attribute this

16: to larger basis set extrapolation errors for the Gaussian basis sets.

17: For quasi particle (QP) resonances above the vacuum level, differences between VASP

18: and Gaussian basis sets are, however, found to be substantial.

19: This is tentatively explained by  insufficient basis set convergence of the Gaussian type orbital calculations

20: as exemplified for selected test cases.

21: 

22: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

23: \end{abstract}

24: