cd87b1d1466d0e8d.tex
1: \begin{abstract} \blfootnote{${}^*${\blue Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands, e-mail:  d.dobler@vu.nl}}
2: \blfootnote{${}^\dagger$Department of Mathematics \& Statistics, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom, e-mail: a.titman@lancaster.ac.uk}
3:  \noindent In this article, weak convergence of the general non-Markov state transition probability estimator by \cite{titman15} is established
4:  which, up to now, {\blue has not been verified yet for other general non-Markov estimators.}
5:  A similar theorem is shown for the bootstrap, yielding resampling-based inference methods for statistical functionals.
6:  Formulas of the involved covariance functions are presented in detail.
7:  {\blue Particular applications include the conditional expected length of stay in a specific state, given occupation of another state in the past, as well as the construction of time-simultaneous confidence bands for the transition probabilities.}
8:  The expected lengths of stay in the two-sample liver cirrhosis data-set by \cite{abgk93} 
9:  are compared and confidence intervals for their difference are constructed.
10:  With borderline significance and in comparison to the placebo group, 
11:  the treatment group has an elevated expected length of stay in the healthy state given an earlier disease state occupation.
12:  In contrast, the Aalen--Johansen estimator-based confidence interval, which relies on a Markov assumption,
13:  leads to a drastically different conclusion.
14:  {\blue Also, graphical illustrations of confidence bands for the transition probabilities  demonstrate the biasedness of the Aalen-Johansen estimator in this data example.}
15:  The reliability of these results is assessed in a simulation study.
16: \end{abstract}
17: