1: \begin{abstract}

2: %%   Optimal linear feedback control design is a valuable but challenging problem.

3: %%   %with many applications.

4: %%   A recent approach known as system level synthesis uses

5: %%   a reparameterization of stabilizing controllers to expand

6: %%   the class of optimal control problems that can be solved using convex

7: %%   reformulations, among other benefits.

8: %%   However, to solve system level synthesis problems prior work

9: %%   relies on finite impulse response

10: %%   approximation methods that lead to

11: %%   deadbeat control, and that can experience infeasibility and increased

12: %%   suboptimality, especially in systems with large separation of time scales.

13: %%   Therefore, this work develops a new optimal control design technique

14: %%   which combines %the reparameterization of

15: %%   system level synthesis with a new

16: %%   approximation based on simple poles.

17: %%   The result is a new control design method which does not result in deadbeat

18: %%   control, is convex and tractable, always feasible,

19: %%   can incorporate prior

20: %%   knowledge, and works well for systems

21: %%   with large separation of time scales.

22: %%   A general suboptimality result is provided which bounds the approximation

23: %%   error based on the geometry of the pole selection.

24: %%   The bound is specialized to a particularly interesting pole selection,

25: %%   %based on an Archimedes spiral,

26: %%   and provides a non-asymptotic convergence rate that is valid even for

27: %%   slowly decaying systems, %optimal transfer functions,

28: %%   unlike prior work.

29: %% %  the corresponding

30: %% %  result based on the finite impulse response approximation.

31: %%   Finally, an example of power converter control design demonstrates

32: %%   superior performance of the simple pole approximation compared to

33: %%   prior methods.

34: %%   %the finite impulse response approximation for this case.

35: %% \end{abstract}

36: