1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: 

4: The (stationary) Schr\"{o}dinger equation for atomistic systems is solved using the adiabatic potential energy curves (PECs) and the associated adiabatic approximation. %Despite being very simplistic,  this approach is very powerful and used in nearly all practical applications.

5: In cases when interactions between electronic states become important, the associated  non-adiabatic effects are taken into account via the derivative couplings (DDRs), also known as non-adiabatic couplings (NACs). For diatomic molecules, the corresponding PECs in the adiabatic representation are characterized by avoided crossings. The alternative to the adiabatic approach is the diabatic representation, obtained via a unitary transformation of the adiabatic states by minimizing the DDRs. For diatomics, the diabatic representation has zero DDR and non-diagonal diabatic couplings (DCs) ensue. The two representations are fully equivalent and so should be the rovibronic energies and wavefunctions which result from the solution of the corresponding Schr\"{o}dinger equations.

6: 

7: We demonstrate (for the first time), the numerical equivalence between the adiabatic and diabatic rovibronic calculations of diatomic molecules, using the \textit{ab initio} curves of yttrium oxide (YO)  and carbon monohydride  (CH)  as examples of two-state systems, where YO is characterized by a strong NAC, while CH has a strong diabatic coupling. Rovibronic energies and wavefunctions are computed using a new diabatic module implemented in variational rovibronic code \textsc{Duo}. We show that it is important to include both the Diagonal Born-Oppenheimer Correction (DBOC) and non-diagonal DDRs. We also show that convergence of the vibronic energy calculations can strongly depend on the representation of nuclear motion used and

8: that no one representation is best in all cases. 

9: 

10: \end{abstract}

11: